Abstract
Motivated by the Covid-19 epidemic, we build a SIR model with private decisions on social distancing and population heterogeneity in terms of infection-induced fatality rates, and calibrate it to UK data to understand the quantitative importance of these assumptions. Compared to our model, the calibrated benchmark version with constant mean contact rate significantly over-predicts the mean contact rate, the death toll, herd immunity and prevalence peak. Instead, the calibrated counterfactual version with endogenous social distancing but no heterogeneity massively under-predicts these statistics. We use our calibrated model to understand how the impact of mitigating policies on the epidemic may depend on the responses these policies induce across the various population segments. We find that policies that shut down some of the essential sectors have a stronger impact on the death toll than on infections and herd immunity compared to policies that shut down non-essential sectors. Furthermore, there might not be an after-wave after policies that shut down some of the essential sectors are lifted. Restrictions on social distancing can generate welfare gains relative to the case of no intervention. Milder but longer restrictions on less essential activities might be better in terms of these welfare gains than stricter but shorter restrictions, whereas the opposite might be the case for restrictions on more essential activities. Finally, shutting down some of the more essential sectors might generate larger welfare gains than shutting down the less essential sectors.
Keywords: COVID-19, Epidemiology, SIR model, Social distancing, Equilibrium, Lockdowns
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Acemoglou, D., Chernozhukov, N., Werning, I., Winston, M.D.: A multi-risk SIR model with optimally targeted lockdown. CEMMAP Working Paper CWP14/20 (2020)
- Alvarez, F., Argente, D., Lippi, F.: A simple planning problem for COVID-19 lockdown, testing and tracing. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights (2020)
- Anderson RM, Anderson B, May RM. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Bodenstein, M., Corsetti, C., Guerrieri, L.: Social distancing and supply disruption in a pandemic. Mimeo (2020) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Eichenbaum, M., Rebelo, S., Trabandt, M.: The macroeconomics of epidemics. Mimeo (2020)
- Farboodi, M., Jarosch, G., Shimer, R.: Internal and External Effects of Social Distancing in a Pandemic. Becker Friedman Institute, Working Paper No 2020-47 (2020)
- Fenichel EP. Economic considerations for social distancing and behavioral based policies during an epidemic. J. Health Econ. 2013;32:440–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galanis, S.: Social proximity as a tool to fight pandemics. Mimeo (2020)
- Geoffard P-Y, Philipson T. Rational epidemics and their public control. Int. Econ. Rev. 1996;37:603–624. doi: 10.2307/2527443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Glover, A., Heathcote, J., Krueger, D., Rios-Rull, J.V.: Health versus wealth: on the distributional effects of controlling a pandemic. Mimeo (2020)
- Hall, R.E., Jones, C.I., Klenow, P.J.: Trading off consumption and COVID-19 deaths. Mimeo (2020)
- Kaplan, G., Moll, B., Violante, G.: Pandemics according to HANK. Mimeo (2020)
- Keppo, J., Kudlyak, M., Quercioli, E., Smith, L., Wilson, A.: The behavioral SIR model, with applications to the Swine Flu and COVID-19 pandemics. Mimeo (2020)
- Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc. R. Soc. A. 1927;115(772):700–721. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kniesner, T., Viscusi, K.: The Value of a Statistical Life. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance (2020). 10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.138
- Krueger, D., Uhlig, H., Xie, T.: Macroeconomic dynamics and reallocation in an epidemic. Mimeo (2020)
- Kucharski AJ, Russell TW, Diamond C, Liu Y, Edmunds J, Funk S, Eggo RM. Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linton, N.M., Kobayashi, T., Yang, Y., Hayashi, K., Akhmetzhanov, A.R., Jung, S.-M., Yuan, B., Kinoshita, R., Nishiura, H.: Incubation period and other epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infections with right truncation: a statistical analysis of publicly available case data. J. Clin. Med. (2020). 10.3390/jcm9020538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Lourenço, J., Paton, R., Ghafari, M., Kraemer, M., Thompson, C., Simmonds, P., Klenerman, P., Gupta, S.: Fundamental principles of epidemic spread highlight the immediate need for large-scale serological surveys to assess the stage of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. medRxiv (2020)
- Maloney WF, Taskin T. Social distancing and economic activity during COVID-19: a global view. COVID Econ. 2020;13:157–177. [Google Scholar]
- Reluga TC. Game theory of social distancing in response to an epidemic. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010;6(5):e1000793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowthorn, R., Toxvaerd, F.: The optimal control of infectious diseases via prevention and treatment. Mimeo (2017)
- Toxvaerd F. Rational disinhibition and externalities in prevention. Int. Econ. Rev. 2019;60(4):1737–1755. doi: 10.1111/iere.12402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Toxvaerd, F.: Equilibrium Social Distancing. Cambridge-INET Working Paper Series No: 2020/08 (2020)
- Wu D, Wu T, Liu Q, Yang Z. The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: what we know. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;94:44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]