Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jul 14;11:14476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93820-6

Physiological and transcriptome analyses for assessing the effects of exogenous uniconazole on drought tolerance in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)

Ying Jiang 1,2, Yufeng Sun 2, Dianfeng Zheng 1,3,4, Chengwei Han 2, Kun Cao 1,2, Lei Xu 1, Shuxia Liu 1,2, Yanyong Cao 5,✉, Naijie Feng 1,3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC8280108  PMID: 34262091

Abstract

Uniconazole (S-(+)-uniconazole), a plant growth retardant, exerts key roles in modulating growth and development and increasing abiotic stress tolerance in plants. However, the underlying mechanisms by which uniconazole regulates drought response remain largely unknown. Here, the effects of exogenous uniconazole on drought tolerance in hemp were studied via physiological and transcriptome analyses of the drought-sensitive industrial hemp cultivar Hanma No. 2 grown under drought stress. Exogenous uniconazole treatment increased hemp tolerance to drought-induced damage by enhancing chlorophyll content and photosynthesis capacity, regulating activities of enzymes involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and altering endogenous hormone levels. Expression of genes associated with porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, photosynthesis-antenna proteins, photosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, and plant hormone signal transduction were significantly regulated by uniconazole compared with that by control (distilled water) under drought stress. Numerous genes were differentially expressed to increase chlorophyll content, enhance photosynthesis, regulate carbon–nitrogen metabolism-related enzyme activities, and alter endogenous hormone levels. Thus, uniconazole regulated physiological and molecular characteristics of photosynthesis, carbon–nitrogen metabolism, and plant hormone signal transduction to enhance drought resistance in industrial hemp.

Subject terms: Plant genetics, Plant physiology, Plant stress responses

Introduction

Drought stress, an abiotic stress, has more important effects on crop yield and quality compared to other abiotic stresses, inducing a highly vulnerable state in plants because of high temperature and low water content1. The photosynthetic system is greatly damaged owing to drought-induced low leaf water content, membrane lipid peroxidation, damaged leaf microstructure, higher leaf cell membrane permeability, and decreased photosynthetic pigment content2. Photosynthesis, as an index of the photosynthetic system, regulates key processes in carbon metabolism. Drought stress reduces net photosynthetic rate and carbon fixation capacity, which affects carbon absorption and metabolism in plants3. Therefore, carbon metabolism must be tightly regulated to enhance drought resistance in plants by changing starch content, with extensive accumulation of soluble sugar and sucrose4, and inverting sucrose catalyzed by sucrose synthase (SS) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS)5. Nitrogen metabolism is closely related to photosynthesis and carbon metabolism and is significant for plants adapting to environmental changes. The activities of key enzymes involved in N metabolism may play a major role in plant photosynthetic adaptation under drought stress6. Tolerance to drought stress is also manifested as increased levels of drought-responsive proteins and the expression of genes involved in signal transduction7. Plants initiate a series of morphological, molecular, and physiological and biochemical changes such as hormone regulation and gene expression to tolerate drought stress8. It is thus vital to study the mechanisms underlying drought stress resistance to develop effective strategies for alleviating drought-induced damage and improving agricultural production.

Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) has one of the longest histories among fibre and traditional economic crops. It provides major raw materials such as fibre, seeds, xyloid stems, and floral leaves for numerous traditional and innovative industries globally9–11. Industrial hemp has a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol content of ≤ 0.3%, according to international standards. Drought stress during the growth period of hemp can lead to an increased incidence of diseases and insect pests, slow growth, and delay fibre and seed maturation, which ultimately affects yield and quality11. Few studies have focused on the mechanisms underlying drought stress resistance in hemp12. Currently, physiological and transcriptome analyses are widely used in plant science to assess changes that occur under drought stress but have been rarely utilized to study such changes in hemp.

Plant growth regulators can be used to regulate plant growth and stress tolerance under conditions of abiotic stress. Uniconazole, as one of the most efficient plant growth regulators, alters different parameters involved in the growth and development of plants under environmental stress13. Uniconazole applied exogenously under stress increases resistance to freezing injury14, water deficit stress15, drought stress16, waterlogging-induced damage17, and salt stress18. Previous studies14–18 revealed that uniconazole improved net photosynthesis and transpiration rate, suggesting an increase in leaf water potential and chlorophyll (Chl) content. Uniconazole also has various functions in promoting proline and soluble sugar accumulation, strengthening the antioxidant defence system, stimulating protein levels and nitrate reductase (NR) activity, and altering endogenous hormone levels. These experiments were conducted for different plants, such as soybean, bean, winter rape, and datura. However, the response of hemp to uniconazole is unclear. Research in other plants has revealed that uniconazole produces a marked effect on plant hormone metabolism. It induced a reduction in the content of gibberellin-like substances, mainly by inhibiting the cytochrome P450 enzyme ent-kaurene oxidase, which catalyses the three oxidation steps of transformation from ent-kaurene to ent-kaurenoic acid19. Uniconazole also suppressed a major abscisic acid (ABA) catabolic enzyme, ABA 8’-hydroxylase20. In addition, Liu et al.21,22 performed transcriptome analysis to dissect uniconazole-regulated expression of genes involved in the starch metabolism pathway. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis was applied to identify the complex molecular mechanisms underlying root development after treatment with uniconazole23. The effects of uniconazole on key enzymes involved in plant hormone signal transduction, carbohydrate metabolism, and starch metabolism pathways had been investigated. However, the genes and metabolic pathways involved in the response of hemp to uniconazole treatment under drought stress are unknown.

In the present study, we investigated the influences of uniconazole on the physiological and genome-wide gene expression of Cannabis sativa L. under drought stress. Our findings potentially lead to a thorough understanding of the biological function and the molecular mechanisms underlying uniconazole activity in hemp under drought stress.

Results

Effect of uniconazole on Chl content and net photosynthetic rate under drought stress

Drought stress decreased Chl content, but uniconazole mitigated this downward trend prominently (Fig. 1). Chl a content in plants treated with uniconazole (DS) was 13.9%, 22.3%, and 27.6% higher than that in drought-treated (D) plants following exposure to drought stress for 4, 6, and 8 days, respectively (Fig. 1a). There was a significant increase in Chl b content of 26.5% in DS plants compared to D plants under drought stress for 8 days (Fig. 1b). The total Chl content of DS plants was 4.1–27.2% higher than that of D plants (Fig. 1c). At 4 and 8 days, carotenoid (Car) content rapidly improved by 11.8% and 39.3% in DS plants, respectively, compared with that in D plants (Fig. 1d).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Uniconazole-induced chlorophyll content (a–d) and net photosynthetic rate (e) under drought stress. All data are presented as the means ± standard errors (n = 4). D and DS expressed as treatments under drought stress and drought stress + uniconazole, respectively.

Net photosynthetic rate (PN) was reduced in the leaves of industrial hemp subjected prolonged drought stress (Fig. 1e). Uniconazole treatment sharply increased PN of plants by 1.1–6.0-fold relative to D plants under drought stress (Fig. 1e).

Effect of uniconazole on carbon metabolism-related enzyme activities under drought stress

Soluble sugar content sharply increased under prolonged drought stress. DS plants showed significant increases of 9.0–30.0% in soluble sugar content relative to D plants (Fig. 2a). Drought caused a drastic decrease in starch content. While exogenous uniconazole treatment alleviated this decrease in starch content that was 7.3%, 27.5%, 19.2%, and 58.2% higher than that in D plants following exposure to drought stress for 2, 4, 6, and 8 days, respectively (Fig. 2b). There was a dramatic increase in sucrose content with the prolonged drought stress. However, DS plants showed reduced sucrose content by 2.7–16.9% compared with D plants (Fig. 2c). Soluble acid invertase (S-AI), neutral invertase (NI), and SS activities reduced with the extension of drought stress. Exogenous uniconazole application relieved this reduction in S-AI, NI and SS activities compared with no application under drought stress (Fig. 2d–f). The SPS activity increased following drought stress for 2, 4, 6, and 8 days, which was decreased significantly by 31.9%, 29.4%, 13.8%, and 31.7% in DS plants, respectively, compared with that in D plants (Fig. 2g).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Uniconazole-induced carbon metabolism-related indicators as soluble sugar content (a), starch content (b), sucrose content (c), activity of soluble acid invertase (d), activity of neutral invertase (e), activity of sucrose synthase (f) and activity of sucrose phosphate synthase (g) under drought stress. All data are presented as the means ± standard errors (n = 4). D and DS expressed as treatments under drought stress and drought stress + uniconazole, respectively.

Effect of uniconazole on nitrogen metabolism-related enzyme activities under drought stress

NR activity, glutamine synthetase (GS) activity and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) activity in the leaves of seedlings decreased under drought stress. Application of uniconazole to seedlings under drought stress for 2, 4, 6, and 8 days increased NR activity sharply by 13.5%, 26.2%, 64.4%, and 136.0%, respectively, compared to that non-treated seedlings (Fig. 3a). Similarly, under drought stress for 2, 4, 6, and 8 days, DS plants showed significantly improved GS activity by 1.1-fold, 1.3-fold, 1.6-fold, and 2.9-fold, respectively, compared with D plants (Fig. 3b). Additionally, DS plants dramatically increased GOGAT activity (1.1–2.8-fold) compared to D plants (Fig. 3c). The activity of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) increased with the aggravation of drought stress. Exogenous uniconazole supplementation reversed this trend of increased GDH activity that was a decrease of 61.3%, 38.2%, 25.9%, and 35.3%, respectively, in DS plants compared with that in D plants under drought stress for 2, 4, 6, and 8 days (Fig. 3d).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Uniconazole-induced nitrogen metabolism-related indicators as activity of nitrate reductase (a), activity of glutamine synthetase (b), activity of glutamate synthase (c) and activity of glutamate dehydrogenase (d) under drought stress. All data are presented as the means ± standard errors (n = 4). D and DS expressed as treatments under drought stress and drought stress + uniconazole, respectively.

Effect of uniconazole on endogenous hormone levels under drought stress

ABA content increased with the prolonged drought stress, but the difference was not significant (Fig. 4a). Under drought stress for 4 days, ABA content of DS plants apparently increased by 2.2% compared with that of D plants (Fig. 4a). The content of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), and zeatin (ZT) markedly decreased by 60.7%, 7.2%, and 30.6%, respectively, under drought stress for 4 days compared with those in plants under drought stress for 2 days (Fig. 4b–d). Compared with untreated plants, exogenous uniconazole application apparently increased IAA content by 2.2-fold and 3.9-fold in plants under drought stress for 2 and 4 days, respectively (Fig. 4b). GA3 content in DS plants was 47.4% and 51.1% lower than that in D plants under drought stress for 2 and 4 days, respectively (Fig. 4c). Compared to plants without supplementation, uniconazole significantly enhanced ZT content by 33.2% and 74.1% under drought stress for 2 and 4 days, respectively (Fig. 4d).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Uniconazole-induced endogenous hormones of ABA (a), IAA (b), GA3 (c), ZT (d) levels under drought stress. All data are presented as the means ± standard errors (n = 3). D and DS expressed as treatments under drought stress and drought stress + uniconazole, respectively.

Effect of uniconazole on the expression of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under drought stress

Twelve samples were collected for transcriptome sequencing, the results from Supplementary Table S1 revealed that the selected reference genome assembly could meet the needs of information analysis. Identification of DEGs revealed 5736 DEGs between D2_vs_DS2 and D4_vs_DS4 (drought stress for 2 and 4 days/drought stress treated with uniconazole for 2 and 4 days). Among them, 1701 DEGs were commonly regulated across different treatment periods, accounting for 29.65%. Non-shared DEGs were 1071 and 2964 in number, accounting for 18.67% and 51.67%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S1a). The results indicated that the exogenous application of uniconazole had already mobilized few genes to counteract the damage caused by drought stress for 2 days and promoted strong drought resistance ability after 4 days of drought stress.

The expression trends of 21 genes were identical between the results of RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR. Thus, the RNA-Seq data was reliable (Supplementary Fig. S1b, Supplementary Table S10).

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichments at D_vs_DS was performed, with the top 20 metabolic pathways shown in Fig. 5. Pathways related to photosynthesis (KO: ko00195), starch and sucrose metabolism (KO: ko00500), photosynthesis-antenna proteins (KO: ko00196), porphyrin and Chl metabolism (KO: ko00860), nitrogen metabolism (KO: ko00910), plant hormone signal transduction (KO: ko04075), and carbon metabolism (KO: ko01200) were significantly enriched by uniconazole under drought stress.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

KEGG enrichment analysis83–85 of the DEGs between D and DS. a, b, KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes of D_vs_DS for 2 days and 4 days, respectively. Each circle represented a KEGG pathway, the ordinate represented the name of the pathway, and the abscissa represented the enrichment factor. The circle color represented q value, the circle size represented the number of genes enriched in the pathway.

DEGs in porphyrin and Chl metabolism, photosynthesis-antenna proteins, and photosynthesis under drought stress

Among 27 DEGs involved in porphyrin and Chl metabolism, 11 were regulated commonly to the two comparisons (D2_vs_DS2 and D4_vs_DS4) (Fig. 6a). In the present study, 7 porphyrin and Chl metabolism related genes were up-regulated and 4 related genes were down-regulated at D2_vs_DS2 and D4_vs_DS4 (Supplementary Table S2). Glutamyl-tRNA reductase gene (hemA; FN36173.1.g) was significantly up-regulated by uniconazole under drought stress. Uniconazole induced up-regulation of genes involved in Chl biosynthesis, such as magnesium (Mg) chelatase subunit gene (chlH; FN16017.1.g), Mg protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester (oxidative) cyclase genes (acsF, chlE; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_6391, and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_6392), and protochlorophyllide reductase gene (por; FN07522.1.g) and increased the intermediate products in the synthetic pathway and contents of Chl a. However, it down-regulated chlorophyll(ide) b reductase genes (NOL, NYC1; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_2056, FN25584.1.g, and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_6970) in plants grown under drought stress.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Heatmap of the DEGs in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, photosynthesis-antenna proteins and photosynthesis between D and DS. The expression level changes of genes in each group were described as log2 fold change of FPKM. Colors indicated up- and down-regulated levels of genes. Uniconazole-induced expression patterns of 11 porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism genes under drought stress (a). Uniconazole-induced expression patterns of 7 photosynthesis-antenna proteins genes under drought stress (b). Uniconazole-induced expression patterns of 20 photosynthesis genes under drought stress (c). D2_vs_DS2 means drought stress for 2 days/drought stress treated with uniconazole for 2 days; D4_vs_DS4 means drought stress for 4 days/drought stress treated with uniconazole for 4 days. The heatmap was constructed using the drawing tools of Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) (https://international.biocloud.net/zh/software/tools/heatmap/-1/-1).

Photosynthesis-antenna proteins play major roles in photosynthesis. Among 10 DEGs in photosynthesis-antenna proteins, 7 were regulated commonly to the two comparisons (Fig. 6b). All genes were Chl a/b-binding protein genes (LHCA2, LHCA3, LHCA4, LHCA5, LHCB1, LHCB5; FN08854.1.g, Cannabis_sativa_newGene_22639, FN20752.1.g, FN20197.1.g, FN00679.1.g, FN11590.1.g, and FN25278.1.g), which were up-regulated by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress (Supplementary Table S3).

In this study, of the 29 DEGs in photosynthesis, 20 were up-regulated commonly to the two comparisons (Fig. 6c). Three photosystem II oxygen-evolving enhancer protein genes (psbQ, psbP; FN36957.1.g, FN29818.1.g, and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_3177) and two photosystem II reaction centre genes (psb28, psbW; FN28964.1.g and FN35311.1.g) exerted primary roles in photosystem II. Photosystem I reaction centre subunit genes (psaD, psaG, psaH, psaK, psaL, psaE; FN19968.1.g, FN09237.1.g, FN05836.1.g, FN12930.1.g, FN25592.1.g, Cannabis_sativa_newGene_11948, and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_8056) catalysed the transfer of electrons from PC to ferredoxin (FD) through a series of electron transporters. One cytochrome c6 gene (petJ; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_11217), one plastocyanin (PC) gene (petE; FN22627.1.g), four FD genes (petF; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_2824, FN00583.1.g, FN03578.1.g, and FN15653.1.g) and two FD-NADP reductase genes (petH; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_18499 and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_18790) were associated with photosynthetic electron transport (Supplementary Table S4).

DEGs in starch, sucrose, and nitrogen metabolisms under drought stress

Among 98 DEGs in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathways, five sucrose-phosphate synthase genes (SPS; FN15293.1.g, FN06206.1.g, FN08251.1.g, FN19565.1.g, and FN33647.1.g) were identified in sucrose metabolism. Among them, FN15293.1.g was down-regulated at D2 compared with that at DS2, but not differentially expressed at D4 relative to that at DS4. Four other genes were not differentially expressed at D2 compared with that at DS2 but were down-regulated at D4 compared with that at DS4 (Supplementary Table S5). Of the 98 DEGs identified, 39 in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathways were regulated similarly (Fig. 7a). Two sucrose synthase genes (SuSy; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_18682 and FN12624.1.g) were down-regulated by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress. In addition, one beta-fructofuranosidase gene (INV), four fructokinase genes (scrK), eight beta-glucosidase genes (bglX), three glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase genes (GN4), two glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase genes (glgC), three glycogen phosphorylase genes (PYG), two 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme genes (GBE1), one beta-amylase gene, seven trehalose 6-phosphate synthase/phosphatase genes (TPS), and three alpha-trehalase genes (TREH), which are involved in the synthesis and hydrolysis of starch, sucrose, fructose and glucose, were induced by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress (Supplementary Table S6).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Heatmap of the DEGs in starch and sucrose metabolism, nitrogen metabolism and plant hormone signal transduction metabolism between D and DS. The expression level changes of genes in each group were described as log2 fold change of FPKM. Colors indicated up- and down-regulated levels of genes. Uniconazole-induced expression patterns of 39 starch and sucrose metabolism genes under drought stress (a). Uniconazole-induced expression patterns of 12 nitrogen metabolism genes under drought stress (b). Uniconazole-induced expression patterns of 28 plant hormone signal transduction metabolism genes under drought stress (c). D2_vs_DS2 means drought stress for 2 days/drought stress treated with uniconazole for 2 days; D4_vs_DS4 means drought stress for 4 days/drought stress treated with uniconazole for 4 days. The heatmap was drawn using the BMKCloud tools (Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) (https://international.biocloud.net/zh/software/tools/heatmap/-1/-1).

Plants adjust to abiotic stress by regulating key enzymes involved in nitrogen metabolism. Among 16 DEGs in the nitrogen metabolic pathways, 12 were regulated commonly to the two comparisons (Fig. 7b). One nitrate/nitrite transporter (NRT) gene (NRT; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_4468) was up-regulated by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress. One glutamine synthetase gene (glnA; FN22131.1.g) and two glutamate synthase genes (GLT1; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_10837 and FN06032.1.g) were down-regulated by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress. Among four glutamate dehydrogenase genes (gdhA; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_1215, Cannabis_sativa_newGene_23402, Cannabis_sativa_newGene_6112, and FN28192.1.g) of interest, Cannabis_sativa_newGene_1215 and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_23402 were down-regulated and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_6112 and FN28192.1.g were up-regulated by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress at D2 compared with those at DS2 but were down-regulated at D4 compared with those at DS4. Moreover, four carbonic anhydrase (CA) genes (cynT; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_18532, Cannabis_sativa_newGene_471, Cannabis_sativa_newGene_8219, and FN11569.1.g) were identified (Supplementary Table S7).

DEGs involved in plant hormone signal transduction under drought stress

Plant hormone signal transduction plays a critical role in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Among 65 DEGs associated with plant hormone signal transduction, 28 were regulated commonly to the two comparisons. These involved IAA, cytokinin (CTK), GA, ABA, brassinosteroid (BR), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA) metabolic processes and signal transduction pathways. Auxin-related genes included one auxin transporter protein gene (AUX1; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_19036), two auxin-responsive protein genes (IAA; FN08651.1.g and FN27264.1.g), four SAUR family protein genes (SAUR; FN03063.1.g, FN03185.1.g, Cannabis_sativa_newGene_6221, and FN33877.1.g), and five auxin responsive GH3 gene family genes (GH3; FN00395.1.g, FN01004.1.g, FN15644.1.g, FN01628.1.g, and FN31094.1.g), all of which are involved in regulating the adaptive growth and development processes of plants, were induced by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress. Four histidine kinase genes (AHK2_3_4; FN12857.1.g, FN18674.1.g, FN27301.1.g, and FN10311.1.g) and one two-component response regulator gene (ARR-A; FN19201.1.g), which are associated with biosynthesis and signal transduction of CKs, were induced by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress. One DELLA protein (DELLA; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_9451), which is related to the signal transduction pathway of GA, was up-regulated by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress. ABA-related genes including one protein phosphatase gene (PP2C; FN20151.1.g) and two serine/threonine-protein kinase genes (SnRK2; Cannabis_sativa_newGene_8004 and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_919) were down-regulated by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress. Genes of BSK (FN03133.1.g), CYCD3 (FN12036.1.g), JAZ (Cannabis_sativa_newGene_14430 and Cannabis_sativa_newGene_18071), MYC2 (FN04245.1.g) were up-regulated, and two transcription factor TGA genes were down-regulated by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Table S8).

Discussion

When plants are subjected to drought stress, total Chl (e.g., Chla, Chl b, and total Chl) and Car levels may decrease24. Drought stress inhibits the synthesis of Chl a/b24, affects light energy absorption, and transmission and conversion of photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII) as well as decreases the photosynthetic rate25. In our study, Chl content decreased under drought stress in industrial hemp (Fig. 1a–d). Our finding that PN was reduced in the leaves of industrial hemp seedlings under drought stress (Fig. 1e) was similar to that documented by Jhou et al.26. Reportedly, uniconazole application markedly improves contents of both Chl and Car and protects plants against drought27. Similar results were observed in this study (Fig. 1a–d). Many genes involved in porphyrin biosynthesis, such as those for glutamyl-tRNA reductase, protoporphyrinogen oxidase, and the Mg chelatase subunit, are regulated to provide better drought tolerance in plants28. Glutamyl-tRNA reductase, a key enzyme in plant porphyrin biosynthesis, affects Mg chelatase and enzymes involved in Chl synthesis29. Mg chelatase catalyses the first step of Chl synthesis30. Mg protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester (oxidative) cyclase is a major enzyme involved in Chl biosynthesis, and induction of the corresponding genes improves Chl content and restores chloroplast structure31. Chlorophyll(ide) b reductase is a necessary enzyme for Chl b degradation, and inhibition of corresponding genes reduces Chl and Car degradation and promotes thylakoid grana retention32. In the present study, the expression of genes corresponding to glutamyl-tRNA reductase, Mg chelatase subunit, Mg protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester (oxidative) cyclase, protochlorophyllide reductase, and Chlorophyll(ide) b reductase were regulated by uniconazole under drought stress (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Table S2). The differential expression of porphyrin and Chl metabolism pathway genes suggested that contents of Chl and Car were affected by uniconazole under drought stress (Fig. 1a–d). Some reports showed that under drought stress, plants treated with uniconazole had a higher PN compared to that in untreated plants15 same to our study (Fig. 1e). Uniconazole application under drought stress can increase the levels of compounds involved in osmoregulation, lessen lipid peroxidation16, and protect cell integrity. These positive effects can improve absorption of light energy and thereby enhance photosynthesis capacity. Light harvesting Chl a/b-binding proteins (LHCs), as the most abundant membrane proteins, are involved in ABA signal transduction by regulating ROS (reactive oxygen species) homeostasis to improve tolerance to drought stress and grain yield33. In the present study, photosynthesis-antenna proteins pathway genes encoding LHCs were up-regulated by uniconazole under drought stress (Fig. 6b, Supplementary Table S3). These results suggest that uniconazole may modulate the drought resistance mechanisms of plants by changes in LHC gene expression. Photosystem II is a unique photosynthesis pigment-protein complex and a site for photosynthetic water oxidation34. The three photosystem II oxygen-evolving enhancer proteins and two photosystem II reaction centre subunits encoded by psbQ, psbP, psb28, and psbW are required for oxidation of water to O2 and thus are essential enzymes (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Table S4). Cytochrome c6 and plastocyanin are soluble electron carriers that transfer electrons to PSI35. In our study, one cytochrome c6 gene and one PC gene were up-regulated by uniconazole under drought stress. Moreover, uniconazole treatment under drought stress regulated seven PSI reaction centre subunit genes coding for proteins that catalysed the transfer of electrons from PC to FD through a series of electron transporters (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Table S4). FD receives electrons from PSI and transfers electrons to FD-NADP reductase (FNR), FNR induces the transfer of electrons from reduced FD to NADP+, and generates reduced NADPH for CO2 fixation and other chloroplast metabolic processes in the Calvin cycle36. Our study showed that four FD genes and two FD-NADP reductase genes were induced by uniconazole in plants grown under drought stress (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Table S4). The differential expression of photosynthetic pathway genes indicated that photosynthesis plays a significant role in the response to drought stress by uniconazole.

Carbon and nitrogen metabolisms, as the two most basic metabolic processes in plant physiology, affect the formation, transformation, and transportation of photosynthetic products37. Plants grown under drought stress are characterized by reduced Chl contents and decreased photosynthesis, which inhibits starch synthesis. In addition, starch was converted into soluble sugar to maintain cell osmotic pressure38. Some studies showed that the content of soluble sugar and sucrose increases but of starch content decreases39, which may be related to the increase of carbohydrate metabolism activity under drought stress. Analogous consequences were observed in our study: soluble sugar and sucrose content improved, whereas starch content decreased with prolonged drought stress (Fig. 2a–c). SPS, SS, S-AI, and NI are key enzymes involved in starch biosynthesis. Zahoor et al.39 reported an increase in SPS and SS activities but a decrease in S-AI activity in response to drought stress. In other reports, SS activity was lowered40 and SPS activity was enhanced41 by stress. These results were replicated in our studies, indicating that S-AI, NI, and SS activities were significantly reduced but SPS activity was increased in drought-treated plants (Fig. 2d–g). SS can catalyse both the synthesis and decomposition of sucrose. Considering our results, SS might play a role in sucrose decomposition. Improved SPS activity changed the distribution of carbon assimilates, resulting in increased contents of soluble sugar and sucrose, which are important for regulating cell osmotic pressure to resist drought stress42. Uniconazole markedly raised the soluble sugar content during waterlogging43, a similar finding was observed here (Fig. 2a). It was reported that exogenous spraying with uniconazole increased starch accumulation, starch granule content, and key enzyme activities involved in starch synthesis 22, same effects were noted in our study (Fig. 2b). An increase in sucrose content and a decrease in starch content were induced by drought stress, indicating that drought promoted the distribution of photosynthetic products to sucrose. Exogenous uniconazole application improved starch content, whereas it reduced the sucrose content of industrial hemp leaves under drought stress (Fig. 2b, c). A reasonable explanation is that uniconazole could enhance the photosynthetic capacity of drought-stressed industrial hemp leaves, which possibly adjusted the synthesis of sucrose and starch influenced by drought stress. Our results revealed that in plants under drought stress, uniconazole supplementation increased S-AI, NI, and SS activities compared with no supplementation (Fig. 2d–f), suggesting that uniconazole promotes sucrose decomposition and regulates photo-assimilation and translocation. SPS affects the distribution of photosynthetic products between starch and sucrose, and its activity is negatively correlated with starch accumulation and positively with sucrose accumulation44. We observed similar results: uniconazole decreased SPS activity, increased starch content, and reduced sucrose content under drought stress (Fig. 2b–g). Drought stress has been reported to influence SPS transcripts levels, indicating that SPS enzymes play central roles in starch and sucrose metabolism pathways45. In the present study, five SPS genes were regulated by uniconazole under drought stress (Supplementary Table S5). Previous studies have shown that sucrose synthase genes are regulated by drought stress, improving hyperosmotic stress tolerance of plants in relation to the accumulation of starch and sucrose metabolism proteins46. The present study described that two SuSy genes were differentially expressed in drought stress induced by uniconazole (Fig. 7a, Supplementary Table S6). In addition, INV (1), scrK (4), bglX (8), GN4 (3), glgC (2), PYG (3), GBE1 (2), TPS (7), TREH (3), and beta-amylase (1) genes were differentially expressed (Fig. 7a, Supplementary Table S6). The differential expression of these genes suggested that the starch and sucrose metabolic pathways were involved in the responses of industrial hemp leaves to drought stress under uniconazole treatment.

Nitrogen metabolism has great significances in plant growth, ecosystem structure and function47. Plants absorb nitrate nitrogen (NO3−) and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+) from soil, which are then converted into amino acids, proteins, and nucleotides by the key enzymes of NR, nitrite reductase, GS, GOGAT, and GDH47 that are crucial to nitrogen assimilation. Reportedly, the activities of NR, GS, and GOGAT in the functional leaves of plants were significantly reduced by drought stress, which affected the assimilation of NO3− and NH4+, then inhibited nitrogen metabolism in the leaves of plants40. Our results were similar to these: NR, GS, and GOGAT activities of industrial hemp leaves were lower in drought stressed seedlings than in controls (Fig. 3a–c). Hessini et al.48 reported that GS levels decreased but GDH activity increased and proline levels improved, suggesting that GDH might be implicated in the synthesis of compatible solute under drought stress. In our results, the activity of GDH increased in drought stressed plants (Fig. 3d). Previous studies with uniconazole revealed that it has important roles in regulating levels of metabolites and promoting an increase in NR activity49. These results are similar to those seen in our study, where uniconazole showed increased NR activity under drought stress (Fig. 3a). Overexpression of the NR gene delayed the decrease in NR activity under drought stress, and the plants rapidly recovered N assimilation after rehydration50. In our study, one nitrate/nitrite transporter gene was up-regulated significantly by uniconazole under drought stress (Fig. 7b, Supplementary Table S7). Previous studies indicated that the regulation of a nitrate transporter gene implicated in N utilization decreased NO3− accumulation of guard cells and enhanced drought tolerance of plants51. In plants under drought stress, exogenous uniconazole application enhanced GS activity compared with no application (Fig. 3b), which is consistent with the results of a previous study52. The GS/GOGAT pathway is the major system for utilizing NH4+ in plants, in our study, exogenous uniconazole application increased the activities of GS and GOGAT to relieve the toxic effect of NH4+ over-accumulation on plant seedlings by converting NH4+ to glutamate53. Previous studies showed that the transcription of glutamine synthetase genes and glutamate synthase genes in different tissues was up-regulated or down-regulated with changes in nitrogen levels54. Overexpression of glutamine synthetase OsGS1;1 and OsGS2 genes could strengthen the tolerance of plants to adverse abiotic stresses at the seedling stage in rice55. Lu et al.56 revealed that the suppression of glutamate synthase genes affected nitrogen assimilation in plants and had significant roles in carbon and nitrogen metabolism. In our studies, one glutamine synthetase gene (glnA) and two glutamate synthase genes (GLT1) were regulated by uniconazole under drought stress (Fig. 7b, Supplementary Table S7). These results revealed that uniconazole promoted the GS/GOGAT cycle, which is important in nitrogen metabolism. Reportedly, GS activity was reduced and GDH activity was increased under conditions of adversity stress, suggesting that glutamate and proline were produced by GDH48,57. Our study showed that DS plants exhibited lower GDH activity than D plants (Fig. 3d). Lightfoot et al.58 found that gdhA transgenic plants had improved seed germination rate, growth level, and grain biomass production and showed enhanced plant resistance by promoting nitrogen uptake59. In our results, four glutamate dehydrogenase genes were induced by uniconazole under drought stress (Fig. 7b, Supplementary Table S7). In addition, four CA genes (cynT) were differentially expressed under drought stress treated with uniconazole (Fig. 7b, Supplementary Table S7), which may catalyse the conversion between CO2 and HCO3−, and play important functions in photosynthesizing cells of plants under environmental stress. The differential expression of nitrogen metabolism pathway genes revealed that nitrogen metabolism had an effect on plants under drought stress treated with uniconazole.

A series of changes in plant endogenous hormones under drought stress reflects the adaptability of plants to stress. Moreover, drought resistance in plants is achieved by the complex coordination of various hormones, rather than by a single hormone. ABA and ZT, as critical endogenous hormones, take part in regulating the abiotic stress response. Some studies showed that drought stress substantially enhanced endogenous hormone ABA level but reduced ZT content, indicating that ABA and ZT jointly controlled plant photosynthetic performance in response to drought stress60. Our results similarly showed that ABA content was increased but ZT level was decreased under drought stress (Fig. 4a, d). Some reports revealed that ABA and ZT levels significantly increased in plants grown under abiotic stress and treated with uniconazole14, promoting the accumulation of proline and abiotic stress-related amino acids13. We noticed that uniconazole application notably increased ABA and ZT contents under drought stress for 4 days (Fig. 4a, d). Previous studies showed that histidine kinases (AHKs) positively affected drought stress responses through the ABA signalling pathway61. Two-component response regulator genes are also employed by plants for stress adaptation62. A previous study revealed that ABA signalling key kinases interacted with the CTK signalling regulator ARR in response to drought stress63. Liu et al.21,22 reported that uniconazole regulated AHKs and type-B ARRs to affect Chl degradation. In our studies, histidine kinase genes (AHK2_3_4) and two-component response regulator gene (ARR-A) were induced by uniconazole under drought stress (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Table S8). Protein phosphatase genes have been isolated and cloned from plants and may play key roles in signal transduction in drought stress64. Serine/threonine-protein kinases are the key regulatory factors of ABA signalling pathways, which are involved in abiotic stress adaptation in plants65. In our studies, protein phosphatase (PP2C) and serine/threonine-protein kinase (SnRK2) were down-regulated by uniconazole as an adaptation to drought stress (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Table S8). Drought stress blocks IAA signal transduction, decreases IAA biosynthesis, and markedly reduces IAA content66. In our study, IAA content was decreased with prolonged drought stress (Fig. 4b). Exogenous uniconazole treatment increased IAA content compared with no treatment in seedlings under drought stress (Fig. 4b). A logical explanation is that uniconazole inhibited IAA oxidase activity under drought stress, thus increasing IAA concentration. Similar conditions have been identified wherein uniconazole-treated plants had increased IAA content under water deficit stress15. It has been reported that auxin transporter genes (AUX/LAX)67, auxin-responsive protein (IAA and SAUR)68, and indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase gene (GH3)69 are involved in the auxin signalling pathway and play important roles in drought tolerance. In the present study, auxin-related genes (AUX1, IAA, SAUR, and GH3) were induced by uniconazole in response to drought stress (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Table S8). Gibberellin plays a key role in different stages of plant growth, such as seed germination, internode elongation, and flower and fruit formation and is involved in regulating abiotic stress processes70. The GA3 level decreased under drought stress, restricting the growth of plants15. In our studies, the content of endogenous GA3 reduced during the final d of drought stress (Fig. 4c). Uniconazole is an inhibitor of gibberellin biosynthesis, reports also found that endogenous GA3 content decreased in uniconazole-treated plants21,22 under stress15. These results were similar to those obtained in our study, where supplemental uniconazole under drought stress decreased the GA3 content (Fig. 4c). DELLA proteins, members of the plant-specific GRAS family, negatively regulate plant growth71. In previous studies, abiotic stress promoted the accumulation of DELLA proteins and then reduced endogenous hormone GA levels to inhibit plant growth and enhance plant tolerance to stress70. However, a study had shown that the overexpression of DELLA proteins (S-della) increased stomatal sensitivity to ABA and reduced water loss72. Uniconazole affected not only the GA biosynthesis pathway but also related genes in this pathway23. A previous study showed that uniconazole regulated the expression of DELLA proteins to affect plant growth22. In our study, one DELLA protein was up-regulated by uniconazole under drought stress (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Table S8). In addition, BSK (1) and CYCD3 (1) genes involved in brassinosteroid biosynthesis; JAZ (2) and MYC2 (1) genes involved in jasmonic acid metabolism; and two transcription factor TGA genes involved in salicylic acid biosynthesis were differentially expressed (induced) by uniconazole (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Table S8). Numerous genes were differentially expressed, showing that plant hormone signal transduction pathways are involved in the response of industrial hemp leaves in plants grown under drought stress and treated with uniconazole.

Based on the above discussion, a hypothetical model of the effects of uniconazole on physiology and genome-wide gene expression in industrial hemp seedlings grown under drought stress is presented in Fig. 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

A hypothetical model of uniconazole on physiological and genome-wide gene expression profiling in industrial hemp seedlings under drought stress. The large ellipse indicates the whole metabolic pathway, the small ellipse represents physiological index, box means differentially expressed genes. The image was drawn by using Adobe Illustrator CC2020 (Adobe Systems Inc, San Jos, CA, USA).

Methods

Plant material and seedling treatments

‘Hanma No. 2’, an industrial hemp cultivar, was used in this study. The variety was bred and served at Daqing Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences (Daqing, China), and the seeds are available from the first author on reasonable request. Germinated seeds were sown in plastic pots with a height of 16 cm, mouth diameter of 20 cm, and bottom diameter of 12.5 cm filled with 2:1 (v/v) grass peat and sand. The properties of grass peat were as follows: maximum field capacity (FC), 46%; pH 6.3; organic matter content, 20.4%; available P, 13.7 mg/kg; NH4+, 315.3 mg/kg; and available K, 206 mg/kg. In total, 15 seedlings per pot were maintained after seed germination. Industrial hemp seedlings were grown using the weighing method, and an appropriate amount of water was added to maintain 70% of FC until the trifoliate stage in the mobile canopy. At the three-leaf stage, half of potted hemp plants (40 pots) were sprayed with 40 mg L−1 uniconazole solution73, and the others were sprayed with distilled water. At 48 h after spraying, the plants were subjected to drought stress for 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 days. D and DS were used to represent drought stress after spraying with distilled water and drought stress after spraying with uniconazole, respectively. The soil moisture content at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 days was maintained at 32%, 28%, 23%, 18%, and 14%, respectively. For physiological experiments, the fully expanded third pair of leaves from the plant base was collected at each treatment; one biological repeat had twenty leaves, and four biological repeats were used. For endogenous hormone levels and RNA-seq, the completely expanded third pair of leaves from the base of plants subjected to drought stress for 2 and 4 days was harvested, and three biological repeats were used for D and DS treatments. The samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and stored at – 80 °C.

Chl content and net photosynthetic rate

Chl, including Chl a, Chl b, and total Chl, and Car contents were measured as reported by Arnon74 with a few modifications. Fresh leaves without veins (0.1 g) were soaked in ethanol and acetone (v/v, 1:1) until the leaves became colourless. Absorbances of the extracts were recorded at 470, 645, and 663 nm.

PN of the third pair of leaves was measured between 9:00 and 11:00 am using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400 XT, LI-COR, Inc. Lincoln, NE, USA) under light intensity of 1000 µmol m−2 s−1.

Carbon metabolism-related enzyme activities

Soluble sugar content was measured using the procedure reported by Spiro75 with a slight modification. Leaves (0.3 g) were cut and placed in a tube, to which 10 mL of distilled water was added. The tube was boiled for 30 min and the extract solution was filtered into a 25 mL volumetric flask. Ethyl anthrone acetate (0.5 mL), H2SO4 (5 mL), and distilled water (1.5 mL) were mixed with the leaf extract (0.5 mL). The mixture was then boiled for 1 min, and the absorbance was recorded at 620 nm after cooling.

Starch content was determined by the method reported by Yemm and Willis76. Leaves (0.1 g) were ground and extracted with 80% ethanol, then centrifuged to remove supernatant. Distilled water was added to the sediment, and the slurry was gelatinized in a boiling water bath for 15 min. Perchloric acid (9.2 M) was used to extract the starch. Distilled water (1.5 mL) and anthrone reagent (anthrone dissolved in concentrated H2SO4, 6.5 mL) were quickly mixed with the extracted solution (1 mL), and colour development was observed for 15 min. After cooling, the absorbance was measured at 620 nm.

To determine sucrose content, 100 μL of supernatant was mixed with 50 μL NaOH (2 M) and boiled for 5 min. Next, 700 μL 30% HCl and 200 μL 0.1% resorcinol were added, and the mixture was boiled for 30 min. After cooling, the absorbance was monitored at 480 nm using distilled water as blank. Sucrose was extracted using assay kits from Cominbio Company Ltd. (Suzhou, China).

For determination of S-AI, NI, SS, and SPS activities, leaves were homogenized with 0.1 M phosphoric acid buffer (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% mercaptoethanol, and 0.1% TritonX-100 mixture in an ice bath, followed by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 15 min to collect the supernatant. The enzyme activities of S-AI, NI, SS, and SPS were measured using enzyme kits (Cominbio, Suzhou, China) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The activities of S-AI, NI, and SS were expressed as microgram (product reducing sugar) per minute per gram77. One SPS activity unit was defined as the production of 1 μg sucrose per min per gram of fresh leaves77.

Nitrogen metabolism-related enzyme activities

The activities of nitrogen metabolism-related enzymes NR, GS, GOGAT, and GDH in fresh leaves were determined using test kits (Cominbio, Suzhou, China). For NR activity, the absorbance was recorded at 340 nm using distilled water as a blank. One unit of NR activity was defined as the reduction of 1 μmol NADH per hour per gram of fresh leaves78. GS activity was analyzed using a GS detection kit, and an enzyme activity unit was calculated as the production of 1 μmol γ-glutamylhydroxamic acid per hour per gram of fresh leaves per millilitre of the reaction system at 540 nm79. GOGAT and GDH activities were monitored using the absorbance at 340 nm, and the consumption of 1 nmol of NADH per minute per gram tissue was defined as one unit enzyme activity79.

Endogenous levels of ABA, IAA, GA3, and ZT

Leaves (0.1 g) were ground in liquid nitrogen; then added into a 1 mL mixture of methanol, water, and acetic acid; and extracted overnight at 4 °C. The extracts were centrifuged at 8000×g for 10 min, and the supernatant was dried to the water phase with nitrogen. After adjusting the pH to 2–3 with citric acid, the solution was extracted three times with ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate phases were combined and dried using a stream of nitrogen and then made up to a constant volume with methanol. The solution was filtered through a 0.22-μm organic filter and assessed using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system. The levels of the endogenous hormones ABA, IAA, GA3, and ZT in the leaves of hemp plants grown under D and DS for 2 and 4 days were analyzed using the method reported by Farrow and Emery80.

RNA-seq library preparation and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from the fully developed third leaves of D2, D4, DS2, and DS4 using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and residual DNA was eliminated with DNase I (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania). RNA concentration and quality were evaluated using a Nanophotometer Spectrophotometer (Implen, CA, United States) and an RNA Nano 6000 assay kit for the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). The RNA sequencing library was constructed following the manufacture’s recommendation by using NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA). Equal amounts of total RNA from each sample were pooled together. Then the mRNAs were purified from total RNA by poly-T oligo-attached VAHTS mRNA Capture Beads (Vazyme BioTech, Nanjing, China). The mRNAs were fragmented to avoid priming bias when synthesizing cDNA by using divalent cations under elevated temperature in NEBNext First Strand Synthesis Reaction Buffer. First-strand cDNAs were synthesized using random hexamer primer and M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (RNase H-). Second-strand cDNAs were subsequently synthesized with DNA Polymerase I and RNase H. Double-stranded cDNAs were purified by VATHS magnetic DNA clean beads (Vazyme BioTech). Then the End Repair Reaction Buffer and End Prep Enzyme Mix were added into the purified products for end repair and adenine (A) addition of 3'-end. The adaptor-ligated cDNAs were then added with USER Enzyme (NEB) for adaptor cleavage. Subsequently, library size selection was conducted using magnetic purification beads (Vazyme BioTech) to capture DNA fragments in a given size range, remove unwanted DNA fragments, and remove contaminants such as enzymes. Then PCR was performed with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase, Universal PCR Primers and Index (X) Primer. At last, PCR products were purified with Vazyme VATHS DNA clean beads and library quality was assessed on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. The RNA-seq library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina HiseqX-ten platform (San Diego, CA, USA) at Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina).

Date processing and identification of DEGs

A large amount of raw data (raw reads) was screened with in-house perl scripts to obtain clean data (clean reads) by removing reads containing adapter and poly-N, and low quality reads. The GC content, Q30 and sequence duplication levels were calculated. High-quality clean reads were mapped to the C. sativa L. reference genome sequence with HISAT281.

Gene expression levels were represented using the fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped read (FPKM) value of each transcript. The abundance of the same transcripts of D2_vs_DS2 and D4_vs_DS4 samples were compared to identify DEGs using DESeq282. This study compared the effects of uniconazole treatment on DEGs in the leaves of industrial hemp grown for 2 and 4 days under drought stress using fold change ≥ 2 and false discovery rate < 0.01 as the screening criteria.

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the KEGG pathway mapping tool (http://www.genome.jp/kegg)83–85 to analyze significantly enriched metabolic pathways or signal transduction pathways of DEGs.

qRT-PCR of mRNAs

Twenty-one genes showing different expression levels in RNA-Seq analyses were selected to confirm the results of RNA-seq with the method of quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses. Total RNA was extracted and purified according to the above method. Subsequently, 1 μg of purified RNA was reverse-transcribed using the FastKing RT Kit (Tiangen BioTek, Beijing, China) to produce cDNA. The GAPDH gene was selected as the reference gene. The qRT-PCR system contained Power qPCR PreMix (Genecopoeia, Rockville, MD, USA), cDNA, and the forward and reverse gene-specific primers. The reaction procedure included 40 cycles of a denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 s, following by an annealing step at 60 °C for 40 s. The experiment consisted of three repetitions. Gene-specific primers were designed by Primer Premier 5 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and listed in Supplementary Table S9.

Data analysis

All experimental data were analyzed by analysis of variance using SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and presented as mean ± standard errors. Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05) was applied to detect differences between means. All graphs were generated using OriginPro 9.1 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

The original RNA sequencing data were submitted to NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/geo/) under series number PRJNA635553.

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant national or international guidelines/regulations/legislation.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure S1. (398.8KB, pdf)
Supplementary Tables. (215.9KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Heilongjiang academy of sciences for supporting. This research was supported by Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences CXJQ2018DQ01 and National Key R&D Projects 2016YFC0501207-03.

Author contributions

Y.J.: Manuscript writing, analysis of data and graphs drawing; Y.C.: Manuscript writing and graphs drawing; N.F. and D.Z.: Review and editing; Y.S. and C.H.: Funding acquisition and investigation; K.C.: project administration; L.X. and S.L.: Sampling and investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yanyong Cao, Email: yanyongcao@126.com.

Naijie Feng, Email: byndfnj@126.com.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-93820-6.

References

  • 1.Nazar R, Umar S, Khan NA, Sareer O. Salicylic acid supplementation improves photosynthesis and growth in mustard through changes in proline accumulation and ethylene formation under drought stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2015;98:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cui G, et al. Beneficial effects of melatonin in overcoming drought stress in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017;118:138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cuellar-Ortiz SM, Arrieta-Montiel MDLP, Acosta-Gallegos J, Covarrubias AA. Relationship between carbohydrate partitioning and drought resistance in common bean. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;31:1399–1409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01853.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu C, et al. Carbon and nitrogen metabolism in leaves and roots of dwarf bamboo (Fargesia denudata Yi) subjected to drought for two consecutive years during sprouting period. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014;33:243–255. doi: 10.1007/s00344-013-9367-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yang M, et al. Effect of post-silking drought stress on the expression profiles of genes involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism during leaf senescence in maize (Zea mays L.) Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018;135:304–309. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xu ZZ, Zhou GS. Nitrogen metabolism and photosynthesis in Leymus chinensis in response to long-term soil drought. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2006;25:252–266. doi: 10.1007/s00344-006-0043-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kang Y, et al. Genome-wide association of drought-related and biomass traits with HapMap SNPs in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:1997–2011. doi: 10.1111/pce.12520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Radhakrishnan R, Lee IJ. Spermine promotes acclimation to osmotic stress by modifying antioxidant, abscisic acid, and jasmonic acid signals in soybean. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013;32:22–30. doi: 10.1007/s00344-012-9274-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Callaway JC. Hempseed as a nutritional resource: An overview. Euphytica. 2004;140:65–72. doi: 10.1007/s10681-004-4811-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Russo EB. History of cannabis and its preparations in saga, science, and sobriquet. Chem. Biodivers. 2007;4:1614–1648. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200790144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abot A, et al. Effects of cultural conditions on the hemp (Cannabis sativa) phloem fibres: Biological development and mechanical properties. J. Compos. Mater. 2013;47:1067–1077. doi: 10.1177/0021998313477669. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gao C, et al. (2018) Genome-wide expression profiles of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to drought stress. Int. J. Genomics. 2018;2018:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2018/3057272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mackay CE, Hall JC, Hofstra G, Fletcher RA. Uniconazole-induced changes in abscisic acid, total amino acids, and proline in Phaseolus vulgaris. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 1990;37:74–82. doi: 10.1016/0048-3575(90)90110-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou W, Leul M. Uniconazole-induced alleviation of freezing injury in relation to changes in hormonal balance, enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in winter rape. Plant Growth Regul. 1998;26:41–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1006004921265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang M, et al. Uniconazole-induced tolerance of soybean to water deficit stress in relation to changes in photosynthesis, hormones and antioxidant system. J. Plant Physiol. 2007;164:709–717. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Keshavarz H, Khodabin G. The role of uniconazole in improving physiological and biochemical attributes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) subjected to drought stress. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2019;22:161–168. doi: 10.1007/s12892-019-0050-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leul M, Zhou W. Alleviation of waterlogging damage in winter rape by application of uniconazole: Effects on morphological characteristics, hormones and photosynthesis. Field Crops Res. 1998;59:121–127. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00112-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Al-Rumaih MM. Physiological response of two species of datura to uniconazole and salt stress. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2007;5:450–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Izumi K, Yamaguchi I, Wada A, Oshio H, Takahashi N. Effects of a new plant growth retardant (E)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-2-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-1-penten-3-ol (S-3307) on the growth and gibberellin content of rice plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 1984;25:611–617. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saito S, et al. A plant growth retardant, uniconazole, is a potent inhibitor of ABA catabolism in Arabidopsis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006;70:1731–1739. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu Y, et al. Uniconazole-induced starch accumulation in the bioenergy crop duckweed (Landoltia punctata) I: Transcriptome analysis of the effects of uniconazole on chlorophyll and endogenous hormone biosynthesis. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2015;8:57. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0246-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu Y, et al. Uniconazole-induced starch accumulation in the bioenergy crop duckweed (Landoltia punctata) II: Transcriptome alterations of pathways involved in carbohydrate metabolism and endogenous hormone crosstalk. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2015;8:64. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0245-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Han Y, et al. Genome-wide transcriptome profiling reveals the mechanism of the effects of uniconazole on root development in Glycine Max. J. Plant Biol. 2017;60:387–403. doi: 10.1007/s12374-017-0028-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ajithkumar IP, Panneerselvam R. Osmolyte accumulation, photosynthetic pigment and growth of Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv. under drought stress. Asian Pac. J. Reprod. 2013;2:220–224. doi: 10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60151-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cornic G. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture—not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:187–188. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01625-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jhou HC, et al. Photosynthetic gas exchange responses of Swietenia macrophylla King and Melia azedarach L. plantations under drought conditions. Bot. Stud. 2017;58:57. doi: 10.1186/s40529-017-0212-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang J, Cao XL, Yong TW, Yang W. Seed treatment with uniconazole powder induced drought tolerance of soybean in relation to changes in photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Res. Crop. 2012;13:147–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yun YB, et al. Protoporphyrinogen oxidase-overexpressing transgenic rice is resistant to drought stress. Crop Sci. 2013;53:1076. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.07.0452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schmied J, Hedtke B, Grimm B. Overexpression of HEMA1 encoding glutamyl-tRNA reductase. J. Plant Physiol. 2011;168:1372–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nakayama M, et al. Cloning, subcellular localization and expression of chl1, a subunit of magnesium chelatase in soybean. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995;215:422–428. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kong W, et al. The catalytic subunit of magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester cyclase forms a chloroplast complex to regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016;92:177–191. doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0513-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sato Y, et al. Two short-chain dehydrogenase/reductases, NON-YELLOW COLORING 1 and NYC1-LIKE, are required for chlorophyll b and light-harvesting complex II degradation during senescence in rice. Plant J. 2009;57:120–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu YH, et al. Light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins are required for stomatal response to abscisic acid in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2012;63:1095–1106. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vinyard DJ, Brudvig GW. Progress toward a molecular mechanism of water oxidation in photosystem II. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2017;68:101–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-044820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Navarro JA, Hervás M, De la Rosa MA. Co-evolution of cytochrome c6 and plastocyanin, mobile proteins transferring electrons from cytochrome b6f to photosystem I. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1997;2:11–22. doi: 10.1007/s007750050101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Arakaki AK, Ceccarelli EA, Carrillo N. Plant-type ferredoxin-NADP+ reductases: A basal structural framework and a multiplicity of functions. FASEB J. 1997;11:133–140. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.11.2.9039955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yang H, Gu X, Ding M, Lu W, Lu D. Weakened carbon and nitrogen metabolisms under post-silking heat stress reduce the yield and dry matter accumulation in waxy maize. J. Integr. Agric. 2020;19:78–88. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62622-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Krasensky J, Jonak C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2012;63:1593–1608. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zahoor R, et al. Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017;137:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ramos MLG, Gordon AJ, Minchin FR, Sprent JI, Parsons R. Effect of water stress on nodule physiology and biochemistry of a drought tolerant cultivar of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Ann. Bot. Lond. 1999;83:57–63. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Niedzwiedz-Siegien I, Bogatek-Leszczynska R, Côme D, Corbineau F. Effects of drying rate on dehydration sensitivity of excised wheat seedling shoots as related to sucrose metabolism and antioxidant enzyme activities. Plant Sci. 2004;167:879–888. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.05.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q. Activities of starch hydrolytic enzymes and sucrose-phosphate synthase in the stems of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. J. Exp. Bot. 2001;52:2169–2179. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.364.2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Qiu J, Wang R, Yan J, Hu J. Seed film coating with uniconazole improves rape seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under waterlogging stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2005;47:75–81. doi: 10.1007/s10725-005-2451-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang Y, Chen KS, Zhang SL, Wang JH. Sugar metabolism and its regulation in postharvest ripening kiwifruit. J. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 2004;30:317–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Netrphan S, Tungngoen K, Suksangpanomrung M, Boonseng O, Narangajavana J. Differential expression of genes involved in sucrose synthesis in source and sink organs of cassava plants undergoing seasonal drought stress. J. Agric. Sci. Camb.. 2012;4:171–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Njokweni A, Ibraheem O, Ndimba B. The role of sucrose metabolizing proteins in hyperosmotic stress tolerance in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Plant Omics. 2016;9:183–190. doi: 10.21475/poj.16.09.03.p7724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang Z, et al. Changes in plant nitrogen acquisition strategies during the restoration of spruce plantations on the eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018;119:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hessini K, Kronzucker HJ, Abdelly C, Cruz C. Drought stress obliterates the preference for ammonium as an N source in the C4 plant Spartina alterniflora. J. Plant Physiol. 2017;213:98–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Godara RN, Gadi BR. Influence of uniconazole on biochemical parameters and nitrate reductase activity in Ziziphus seedlings under salt stress. Biochem. Cell Arch. 2015;15:461–464. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ferrario-Méry S, Valadier MH, Foyer CH. Overexpression of nitrate reductase in tobacco delays drought-induced decreases in nitrate reductase activity and mRNA. Plant physiol. 1998;117:293–302. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.1.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guo FQ, Young J, Crawford NM. The nitrate transporter AtNRT1.1 (CHL1) functions in stomatal opening and contributes to drought susceptibility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15:107–117. doi: 10.1105/tpc.006312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Xiang ZF, Yang WY, Ren WJ, Wang XC. Effects of uniconazole on nitrogen metabolism and grain protein content of rice. Rice Sci. 2005;12:107–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.An ZZ, Wang XC, Yan WD, Shi WM. Effects of sulfate and cadmium interaction on cadmium accumulation and content of nonprotein thiols in rice seedlings. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2004;41:728–734. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhao XQ, Shi WM. Expression analysis of the glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase gene families in young rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Plant Sci. 2006;170:748–754. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.James D, et al. Concurrent overexpression of OsGS1;1 and OsGS2 genes in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.): Impact on tolerance to abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:786. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lu YE, Luo F, Yang M, Li XH, Lian XM. Suppression of glutamate synthase genes significantly affects carbon and nitrogen metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Sci. China Life Sci. 2011;54:651–663. doi: 10.1007/s11427-011-4191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang ZQ, Yuan YZ, Ou JQ, Lin QH, Zhang CF. Glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase contribute differentially to proline accumulation in leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings exposed to different salinity. J. Plant Physiol. 2007;164:695–701. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lightfoot DA, et al. Improved drought tolerance of transgenic Zea mays plants that express the glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdhA) of E. coli. Euphytica. 2007;156:103–116. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9357-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhang H, et al. Introduction of a fungal NADP(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (gdhA) improves growth, grain weight and salt resistance by enhancing the nitrogen uptake efficiency in forage rice. Plant Prod. Sci. 2016;19:1–12. doi: 10.1080/1343943X.2015.1133237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang JC, Zhang JH, Wang ZQ, Zhu QS, Liu LJ. Involvement of abscisic acid and cytokinins in the senescence and remobilization of carbon reserves in wheat subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:1621–1631. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01081.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tran L-SP, et al. Functional analysis of AHK1/ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007;104:20623–20628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706547105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Desai C, Mavrianos J, Chauhan N. Candida albicans SRR1, a putative two-component response regulator gene, is required for stress adaptation, morphogenesis, and virulence. Eukaryot. Cell. 2011;10:1370–1374. doi: 10.1128/EC.05188-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Huang X, et al. The antagonistic action of abscisic acid and cytokinin signaling mediates drought stress response in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2018;11:970–982. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xu C, Jing R, Mao X, Jia X, Chang X. A wheat (Triticum aestivum) protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit gene provides enhanced drought tolerance in tobacco. Ann. Bot. Lond. 2007;99:439–450. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dey A, Samanta MK, Gayen S, Maiti MK. The sucrose non-fermenting 1-related kinase 2 gene SAPK9 improves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice by modulating cellular osmotic potential, stomatal closure and stress-responsive gene expression. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16:158. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0845-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Saeedipour S, Moradi F. Relationship of endogenous ABA and IAA to accumulation of grain protein and starch in two winter wheat cultivars under post-anthesis water deficit. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 2012;4:263–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yue R, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling analysis of ZmPIN, ZmPILS, ZmLAX and ZmABCB auxin transporter gene families in maize (Zea mays L.) under various abiotic stresses. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:199–214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wu J, et al. Genome-wide analysis of SAUR gene family in Solanaceae species. Gene. 2012;509:38–50. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Du H, et al. A GH3 family member, OsGH3-2, modulates auxin and abscisic acid levels and differentially affects drought and cold tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2012;63:6467–6480. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Colebrook EH, Thomas SG, Phillips AL, Hedden P. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2014;217:67–75. doi: 10.1242/jeb.089938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang Y, et al. Molecular and functional characterization of two DELLA protein-coding genes in litchi. Gene. 2020;738:144455. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nir I, et al. The tomato DELLA protein PROCERA acts in guard cells to promote stomatal closure. Plant Cell. 2017;29:3186–3197. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jiang Y, et al. Effects of uniconazole (S3307) with seed soaking on seed germination and leaf spraying on physiological characteristics of seedlings in industrial hemp. Plant Fiber Sci. China. 2020;42:18–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24:1–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Spiro RG. Analysis of sugars found in glycoproteins. Method Enzymol. 1966;8:3–26. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(66)08005-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yemm EW, Willis AJ. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 1954;57:508–514. doi: 10.1042/bj0570508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Liang G, et al. Transcriptome studies the effect of glucose on carbon metabolism of grape plantlets. Acta Horticult. Sin. 2019;46:121–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zou L, Qi D, Sun J, Zheng X, Peng M. Expression of the cassava nitrate transporter NRT2.1 enables Arabidopsis low nitrate tolerance. J. Genet. 2019;98:74. doi: 10.1007/s12041-019-1127-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Anwar A, Li Y, He C, Yu X. 24-Epibrassinolide promotes NO3− and NH4+ ion flux rate and NRT1 gene expression in cucumber under suboptimal root zone temperature. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:225. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1838-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Farrow SC, Emery RJN. Concurrent profiling of indole-3-acetic acid, abscisic acid, and cytokinins and structurally related purines by high-performance-liquid-chromatography tandem electrospray mass spectrometry. Plant Methods. 2012;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-8-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28:1947–1951. doi: 10.1002/pro.3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, Tanabe M. KEGG: Integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D545–D551. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1. (398.8KB, pdf)
Supplementary Tables. (215.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES