Abstract
Background: The relationship between fasting hyperglycemia (FHG) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unclear, and whether their co-occurrence is associated with a worse in-hospital and long-term prognosis than FHG or AF alone is unknown.
Objective: To explore the correlation between FHG and new-onset AF in patients with AMI, and their impact on in-hospital and long-term all-cause mortality.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study comprising 563 AMI patients. The patients were divided into the FHG group and the NFHG group. The incidence of new-onset AF during hospitalization was compared between the two groups and sub-groups under different Killip grades. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between FHG and new-onset AF. In-hospital mortality and long-term all-cause mortality were compared among patients with FHG, AF, and with both FHG and AF according to 10 years of follow-up information.
Results: New-onset AF occurred more frequently in the FHG group than in the NFHG group (21.6 vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001). This trend was observed for Killip grade I (16.6 vs. 6.5%, p = 0.002) and Grade II (17.1 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.005), but not for Killip grade III–IV (40 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.761). Logistic regression showed FHG independently correlated with new-onset AF (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.53–4.30; P < 0.001), and 1 mmol/L increased in fasting glucose was associated with a 5% higher rate of new-onset AF, after adjustment for traditional AF risk factors. AMI patients complicated with both fasting hyperglycemia and AF showed the highest in-hospital mortality and long-term all-cause mortality during an average of 11.2 years of follow-up. Multivariate Cox regression showed FHG combined with AF independently correlated with long-term all-cause mortality after adjustment for other traditional risk factors (OR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.64–5.96, p = 0.001), compared with the group with neither FHG nor new-onset AF.
Conclusion: FHG was an independent risk factor for new-onset AF in patients with AMI. AMI patients complicated with both FHG and new-onset AF showed worse in-hospital and long-term all-cause mortality than with FHG or AF alone.
Keywords: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, fasting hyperglycemia, prognosis, mortality
Background
Hyperglycemia frequently complicates the clinical course of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1), and is associated with a worse prognosis regardless of diabetic status (2–4). Previous reports have shown that hyperglycemia causes oxidative stress, induces apoptosis, and activates coagulation, which exacerbates damage in the setting of ischemia (5–8). Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in the general population (9, 10). It is also frequently observed after AMI, with a reported incidence of 5–23% (9, 11–13). AF is also a well-established predictor of poor short- and long-term prognosis in patients with AMI (9).
Although both hyperglycemia and AF are common in AMI patients, and extensive studies have indicated their value in predicting prognosis, little data are available concerning the correlation between hyperglycemia and new-onset AF. Whether hyperglycemia contributes to the prevalence of new-onset AF in this setting is unknown. Moreover, whether hyperglycemia combined with AF shows a worse prognosis than hyperglycemia or AF alone is unclear.
Therefore, we performed a retrospective cohort study with 10 years of follow-up data to explore the correlation between hyperglycemia and new-onset AF in patients with AMI, and their impact on in-hospital and long-term prognosis.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
We retrospectively enrolled patients who were admitted to our institute and diagnosed with AMI [including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)] from 1 January 2007 to 1 January 2009. The ethics committee on clinical scientific research and laboratory animal of Zhongshan People's Hospital approved the study (review number: K2019-057). The exclusion criteria were patients (1) with previous known AF or atrial flutter, (2) with unavailable hyperglycemia data, (3) complicated with pulmonary failure defined as a PO2 level <60 mmHg or a PCO2 level more than 50 mmHg according to blood gas analysis, (4) complicated with liver damage defined as an ALT level 3 times higher than the normal upper limit, (5) complicated with severe renal failure defined as a serum creatinine (CR) level >265 μmol/L (6) complicated with pancreatic system diseases or heart valve disease (moderate to severe valve regurgitation or stenosis), (7) complicated with hyperthyroidism, and (8) complicated with carcinoma.
Methods
Baseline Data Collection
Data on age, sex, previous history of diabetes, hypertension, cerebral stroke, and smoking habits were collected according to inpatient records. Other data, such as the peak value of creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB), CR, fasting glucose (FG) level, glycosylated hemoglobin level, left atrial diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) according to echocardiography, Killip grades, medication treatment during hospitalization, whether the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed and new-onset AF complications, were also collected.
Correlation Between Hyperglycemia and New-Onset AF
All the enrolled patients were divided into a fasting hyperglycemia group (FHG group, FG ≥ 7 mmol/L), and a no fasting hyperglycemia group (NFHG group, FG <7 mmol/L). The incidence of new-onset AF during hospitalization was compared between the two groups as well as sub-groups under different Killip grades.
In-Hospital Mortality
The patients were divided into four groups according to whether they had AF, hyperglycemia or both: FHG–AF– (have neither hyperglycemia nor AF), FHG–AF+ (have AF only), FHG+AF– (have hyperglycemia only), and FHG+AF+ (have both hyperglycemia and AF). In-hospital mortality among the four groups was compared.
Ten Years of Follow-Up
We choose all-cause mortality as the endpoint of the study. All patients who survived and were discharged were followed up until December 31, 2019. We collected follow-up information either by outpatient medical records or through routine telephone follow-up records every year. Death events were recorded during this period. We compared the influence of FHG and new-onset AF, and their co-occurrence on all-cause mortality.
Definition of Exposure and Outcomes
Definition of New-Onset AF
AF was diagnosed as the absence of P waves, coarse or fine fibrillatory waves, and irregular RR intervals. New-onset AF was defined as electrocardiographic evidence of AF during hospitalization, and those patients were absent of persistent or paroxysmal AF or atrial flutter previously.
Definition of AMI
AMI was defined as patients with typical angina pectoris and ST-elevation at the J-point with the cutoff point of C 0.1 mV in at least two contiguous leads of the electrocardiogram (ECG) in standard lead I through AVF. An ST-elevation of 0.2 mV in V1 through V6 was defined as STEMI, and patients with increased cardiac biomarkers (mainly creatinine phosphokinase, CPK) were defined as NSTEMI.
Definition of Hyperglycemia
In our study, we chose the FG concentration as the evaluation index, and samples were measured upon hospital admission with at least 8 h of overnight fasting. A cutoff value of 7 mmol/L (126 mg/dl) was used to define fasting hyperglycemia.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Numerical variables are represented as the mean ± standard deviation or median, and categorical variables as percentages or rates. To test differences between the groups, the Student's t-test was used for numerical variables with a Gaussian distribution, and the Mann–Whitney U-test was employed if there was a non-Gaussian distribution. Categorical variables were analyzed with the chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between FG and new-onset AF. We primarily modeled FG as a continuous variable, and then categorized FG into hyperglycemia group (FG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L) and normal group (FG <7.0). The initial model was adjusted for age and gender. A second model was additionally adjusted for smoking, hypertension, previous MI, previous stroke, and creatine. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare long-term all-cause mortality under different FHG and new-onset AF status. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for all-cause mortality. A p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Results
Enrollment and Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population
From 1 January 2007 to 1 January 2009, a total of 796 patients diagnosed with AMI were admitted to our institute. Five hundred sixty-three patients were finally enrolled in this study. Two hundred fifty patients were assigned to the FHG group (FG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L), and 313 patients were assigned to the NFHG group (FG <7.0 mmol/L). The patient flowchart is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of participants. FG, fasting glucose; Ccr, creatinine clearance rate.
Of the 563 patients enrolled, 448 (79.6%) were male, and the average age was 62.59 ± 13.20 years. AMI patients were treated according to guidelines recommendation. Eighty-three patients (14.7%) were complicated with new-onset AF. Fifty-two cases of which were paroxysmal AF while the other 31 were persistent AF. All 52 cases with paroxysmal AF successfully recovered sinus rhythm spontaneously. Twenty-five of the other 31 persistent AF were also converted to sinus rhythm either by direct-current, or by pharmacological cardioversion. Individualized antithrombotic therapy was also given to patients according to the guidelines recommendation and clinical evaluation. Participants in the FHG group were more likely to be female, non-smoker, lower LVEF, higher Killip classification, and previous DM (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of patients in NFHG group vs. FHG group.
| NFHG group (n = 313) | FHG group (n = 250) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Characteristics | |||
| Age, years | 62.04 ± 13.15 | 63.29 ± 13.25 | 0.306 |
| Gender, male,% | 265 (84) | 183 (73) | 0.003* |
| Previous History | |||
| Myocardial infarction, n, % | 3 (0.9) | 7 (2.8) | 0.89 |
| Angina pectoris, n, % | 5 (1.6) | 8 (3.2) | 0.26 |
| Cerebral stroke, n, % | 19 (3.1) | 11 (4.4) | 0.45 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n, % | 26 (8.3) | 45 (18) | 0.001* |
| Smokers, n, % | 178 (56.9) | 108 (43.2) | 0.003* |
| Hypertension, n, % | 137 (43.8) | 114 (45.6) | 0.608 |
| Biochemistry and Image Results | |||
| Peak value of CK-MB, U/L | 129.9 ± 79.4 | 146.0 ± 39.8 | <0.001* |
| Killip grade I, n, % | 217 (69.3) | 141 (56.4) | <0.001* |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 0.001* |
| Left atrial diameter, mm | 35.5 ± 6.6 | 34.8 ± 8.6 | 0.201 |
| Serum potassium, mmol/L | 3.83 ± 0.38 | 3.80 ± 0.43 | 0.075 |
| Medication During Hospitalization | |||
| Aspirin, n, % | 295 (94.2) | 225 (90) | 0.078 |
| Clopidogrel, n, % | 270 (86.2) | 208 (83.2) | 0.334 |
| Statins, n, % | 300 (95.8) | 230 (92) | 0.070 |
| Low molecular weight heparin, n, % | 248 (79.2.3) | 195 (78) | 0.756 |
| Warfarin, n, % | 38 (12.1) | 50 (20) | 0.014* |
| β blocker, n, % | 137 (43.8) | 114 (45.6) | 0.391 |
| ACEI, n, % | 304 (97.1) | 219 (87.6) | <0.001* |
| GPIIb/IIIa, n % | 54 (17.3) | 59 (23.6) | 0.057 |
| Diuretics, n, % | 177 (56.5) | 199 (79.6) | <0.001* |
| Reperfusion Therapy | |||
| Acute anterior myocardial infarction, n, % | 110 (35.1) | 80 (32) | 0.531 |
| Patients which PCI were performed, n, % | 247 (68) | 178 (70) | 0.076 |
| Triple vessels or left main leision | 117 (37.4) | 84 (33.6) | 0.427 |
| Rate of new onset atrial fibrillation | 29 (9.2) | 54 (21.6) | <0.001* |
NFHG, no fasting hyperglycemia; FHG, fasting hyperglycemia; ACEI, renin angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention;
P < 0.05.
Correlation Between Fasting Hyperglycemia and New-Onset AF in Patients With AMI
New-onset AF occurred more often in the FHG group than in the NFHG group (21.6 vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001), Table 1. The FHG group showed worse pump function than the NFHG group. We performed subgroup analysis according to different Killip classifications to further clarify the relationship between hyperglycemia and AF. In subgroup Killip grade I, the FHG group had a higher rate of new-onset AF than the NFH group (16.6 vs. 6.5%, p = 0.002), and a similar trend was observed in subgroup Killip grade II (17.1 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.005), but not for Killip grade III–IV (40 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.761). Table 2 shows the comparison of baseline variables and incidence of AF among groups.
Table 2.
Sub-group analysis.
| Killip grade I | Killip grade II | Killip grade III–IV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFHG n = 216 | FHG n = 140 | NFHG n = 82 | FHG n = 70 | NFHG n = 15 | FHG n = 40 | |
| Gender, male, % | 186 (86.1) | 101 (72.1)* | 65 (79.3) | 53 (75.7) | 14 (93.3) | 29 (72.5) |
| Age, year, ±s | 61.8 ± 12.8 | 63.2 ± 13.2 | 64.2 ± 12.2 | 65.0 ± 12 | 65.7 ± 4.1 | 64.0 ± 2.4 |
| Left ejection fraction ±s | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.51 ± 0.13 | 0.50 ± 0.11 | 0.46 ± 0.12 | 0.46 ± 0.11 | 0.45 ± 0.13 |
| Serum potassium ±s | 3.82 ± 0.40 | 3.80 ± 0.42 | 3.82 ± 0.36 | 3.82 ± 0.46 | 3.79 ± 0.46 | 3.78 ± 0.42 |
| Left atrial diameter ±s | 34.8 ± 5.8 | 34.1 ± 8.3 | 37.1 ± 8.1 | 36.2 ± 8.0 | 34.8 ± 5.8 | 34.1 ± 8.3 |
| Diabetes, n % | 16 (7.4) | 28 (20.0) | 8 (9.8) | 8 (11.4) | 2 (13.3) | 9 (22.5) |
| Hypertension, n% | 94 (43.5) | 64 (45.7) | 38 (46.3) | 33 (47.1) | 5 (33.3) | 17 (42.5) |
| Rate of new onset fibrillation, n, % | 14 (6.5) | 23 (16.4)* | 10 (12.2) | 15 (21.4)§ | 5 (33.3) | 16 (40) |
Baseline characteristic and new onset AF comparation between NFHG group and FHG group under different killip level.
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis in model 1 to model 3 by subsequently adjusting confounding risk factors to explore whether FHG was independently correlated with new-onset AF. In the model that measured FG as a continuous variable, an increase of 1 mmol/L in FG was associated with a 5% higher rate of new-onset AF [(odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00–1.10); P = 0.044], after adjusting for all co-variables (Table 3). Results were similar when we categorized individuals into the FHG and NFHG groups in both unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.001). In the final model, the odds ratio for the FHG group was 2.56 (95% CI, 1.53–4.30; p < 0.001), taking the NFHG group as reference (Table 3).
Table 3.
Association between fasting blood glucose and new onset atrial fibrillation.
| FBG | Incident rate | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| Continuous variables, per mmol/L | 83/563 | 1.07 (1.02, 1.12) | 0.006 | 1.06 (1.01, 1.11) | 0.016 | 1.05 (1.00, 1.10) | 0.044 |
| ≥7 mmol/L | 55/250 | 2.88 (1.75, 4.74) | <0.001 | 2.79 (1.68, 4.63) | <0.001 | 2.56 (1.53, 4.30) | <0.001 |
| <7 mmol/L | 28/313 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
Model 1, adjusted for age, gender; Model 2, further adjusted for smoking, hypertension, previous MI, previous stroke, creatine; Model 3, further adjusted for previous DM, ejection fraction.
Incidence of New-Onset AF Among Stress Hyperglycemia, Newly Diagnosed DM, and Previously Diagnosed DM
According to the levels of fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose (determined by the oral glucose tolerance test) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), patients were divided into the following groups: previously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (previous DM), newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (N-DM) and stress hyperglycemia (SHG). The previous DM, N-DM, and SHG patients had a higher rate of new-onset AF than patients in the normal FG group, while there was no significant difference among the previous DM, N-DM, and SHG groups (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation among stress hyperglycemia (SHG group), newly diagnosed diabetes (New-DM group), and previous diabetes (previous-DM group). Previous-DM patients, newly diagnosed DM patients and SHG patients had a higher rate of new-onset fibrillation compared with patients with normal FG group (16 vs. 29 vs. 21 vs. 7.8%,*P < 0.05), while there is no statistic difference among the three groups (16 vs. 29 vs. 21%, #p = 0.152).
In-Hospital and Long-Term Mortality
Either hyperglycemia or new-onset AF contributed to the increased in-hospital mortality in patients with myocardial infarction. Compared with the other patients, those complicated with both FHG, and new-onset AF exhibited the highest in-hospital mortality (Figure 3). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both new-onset AF and FHG were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality after adjusting other traditional risk factors (Table 4).
Figure 3.
Comparison of in hospital mortality among groups. FHG+AF– group showed higher rate of in hospital mortality compared with FHG–AF– group (9.7 vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001). In hospital mortality was higher in FHG+AF+ group compared with FHG–AF+ group (35.2 vs. 13.8%, P = 0.047), while there was no difference between FHG+AF– and FHG–AF+ group (9.7 vs. 13.8%, P = 0.326). FHG–AF–, patients with neither fasting hyperglycemia nor new-onset atrial fibrillation; FHG+AF– patients with fasting hyperglycemia but without new-onset atrial fibrillation; FG–AF+, patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation but without fasting hyperglycemia; FG+AF+, patients with both fasting hyperglycemia and new-onset atrial fibrillation.
Table 4.
Logistic regression analysis for risk factors attributing to in-hospital mortality in the study.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
| Age, years | 1.019 (0.994–1.045) | 0.132 | ||
| Gender, male | 0.633 (0.314–1.276) | 0.201 | ||
| History of HBP | 2.362 (1.228–4.547) | 0.01 | ||
| History of DM | 1.658 (0.736–3.735) | 0.222 | ||
| Killip grade II–IV | 3.161 (1.660–6.019) | <0.001* | 1.446 (0.647–3.232) | 0.369 |
| Peak value of CK-MB | 1.000 (0.999–1.001) | 0.938 | ||
| With left main or tripple vessels lesions | 0.520 (0.251–1.079) | 0.079 | ||
| Left ejection fraction | 0.007 (0.001–1.067) | <0.001* | 0.031 (0.002–0.533) | 0.017* |
| Left atrium diameter | 0.989 (0.948–1.031) | 0.594 | ||
| Complicated with FHG | 11.130 (4.130–28.741) | <0.001* | 8.134 (2.664–24.841) | <0.001* |
| With new onset AF | 6.580 (3.400–12.736) | <0.001* | 6.612 (2.878–15.191) | <0.001* |
| PCI performed | 0.348 (0.184–0.658) | 0.001* | 0.583 (0.257–1.322) | 0.196 |
| Use of ACEI/ARB | 0.097 (0.045–0.208) | <0.001* | 0.342 (0.114–1.024) | 0.055 |
| Use of β-blocker | 0.213 (0.108–0.420) | <0.001 | 0.226 (0.081–0.628) | 0.044* |
| Use of diuretics | 0.890 (0.502–1.581) | 0.692 |
DM, diabetic mellitus; HBP, hypertensive blood pressure; CK-MB, creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme; FHG, fasting hyperglycemia; AF, atrial fibrillation; PCI, Percutaneous coronary intervention; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker;
P < 0.05.
A total of 520 patients were discharged except for 43 deaths during hospitalization. Forty-two other cases were lost with follow-up information and 94 deaths were recorded during an average of 11.2 ± 0.68 years of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients complicated with either FHG or AF showed a higher cumulative rates of all-cause mortality than those with neither AF nor FHG. Patients complicated with both FHG and AF showed the highest long-term all-cause mortality (P for log-rank test = 0.002, Figure 4). Multivariate Cox regression showed that AMI patients with both FHG and AF (FHG+AF+) were independently correlated with long term all-cause mortality after adjusting other confounding risk factors (odds ratio, 3.13; 95% CI 1.64–5.96, P = 0.001, Table 5).
Figure 4.
Comparison of long term all-cause mortality under different FHG and new-onset AF status. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients complicated with either FHG (AF–/FHG+) or AF (AF+/FHG–) had obviously higher cumulative rates of all-cause mortality than those with neither AF nor FHG (AF–/FHG–). Patients complicated with both FHG and AF (AF+/FHG+) showed the worst long-term all-cause mortality, P for log-rank test was 0.002.
Table 5.
Association between AF/FHG status and all-cause mortality.
| AF/FH status | Incident rate | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| AF–/FHG– | 40/266 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| AF–/FHG+ | 33/148 | 1.47 (0.90, 2.42) | 0.123 | 1.46 (0.88, 2.40) | 0.142 | 1.41 (0.85, 2.35) | 0.184 |
| AF+/FHG– | 6/27 | 1.51 (0.59, 3.83) | 0.390 | 1.61 (0.63, 4.12) | 0.317 | 1.44 (0.56, 3.70) | 0.453 |
| AF+/FHG+ | 15/37 | 3.76 (1.99, 7.09) | <0.001 | 3.45 (1.82, 6.54) | <0.001 | 3.13 (1.64, 5.96) | 0.001 |
AF, atrial fibrillation; FHG, fasting hyperglycemia.
Model 1, adjusted for age, gender; Model 2, further adjusted for smoking, hypertension, previous myocardial infraction, previous stroke; Model 3, further adjusted for previous DM, ejection fraction.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically explore the relationship between FHG and new-onset AF, and their combined impact on prognosis in patients with AMI with a long-term follow-up. The main findings of the article are as follows: (i) fasting hyperglycemia was independently associated with new-onset AF after adjusted other traditional risk factors in patients with AMI. (ii) AMI patients complicated with both FHG and new-onset AF showed worse in-hospital mortality and long-term all-cause mortality than FHG or AF alone.
AF is the most common super-ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the general population (9, 10). It is also frequently complicating the clinical course after an acute myocardial infarction with a reported incidence of 5–23% (9, 11–13). In this study, we found that 81 of 549 (14.8%) AMI patients complicated with new-onset AF. Our result was consistent with previous reports (9, 11–13). Several clinical variables such as age, congestive heart failure, kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, and pulmonary disease have been reported as risk factors for new-onset AF (12, 14–18). However, whether FHG was an independent risk factor for new-onset AF in AMI patients was not established. Several large sample size prospective epidemiologic studies based on nationwide or community databases have showed that, in the general population, FG was independently correlated with AF (19–21). However, whether FG remained an independent risk factor for new-onset AF in AMI has not been reported. In this study, we found new-onset AF occurred more often in the FHG group than in the NFHG group, and this association was consistent in several subgroup analyses under different Killip grades. To further clarify the relationship, we subsequently adjusted confounding risk factors such as age, gender, smoking, hypertension, previous MI, previous stroke, creatine, previous DM and ejection fraction, and found that FG remained an independent risk factor for AF. We then categorized individuals into FHG group and normal group, the results were similar.
AMI patients complicated with hyperglycemia contained three clinical status: prior or new diagnosed diabetes, prior or newly diagnosed pre-diabetes and stress hyperglycemia (2). In our study, we compared the rate of new-onset AF among (SHG), newly diagnosed diabetes (new-DM), previously diagnosed diabetes (previous-DM), prior or newly diagnosed pre-diabetes group. We found that DM, N-DM, and SHG patients had a higher rate of new-onset AF than the normal FG-group or pre-diabetes group, while there was no significant difference among the DM, N-DM, and SHG groups. After adjustment for previous diabetes and other confounding risk factors, FHG independently correlated with new-onset AF (Table 3). Our results may be valuable in reminding clinicians to pay more attention to the short-term fluctuation in fasting blood glucose after AMI.
The exact mechanism by which hyperglycemia is closely related to an increased incidence of new-onset AF in AMI is still unclear, and several reasons may explain this. First, in AMI, the strong excitation of the sympathetic adrenal medulla releases a large amount of catecholamines, glucagon hormones and growth hormones, which can reduce glycogen synthesis and glucose utilization in myocardial cells (22). In addition, hyperglycemia leads to platelet aggregation, fibrinolysis inhibition, and collateral circulation disturbance, which increases the imbalance of myocardial energy supply and demand (6, 23, 24). This affects the polarization of cardiac myocytes and is associated with various arrhythmias, including AF (25). Second, the hyperosmotic state of blood caused by hyperglycemia has an important impact on the electrophysiological activity of atrial myocytes in circumferential pulmonary veins, which may also be one of the important reasons for the increased incidence of AF (26). Evidence from animal experiment showed that hyperglycemia can lead to spatial heterogeneity (nerve remodeling) of autonomic innervation of atrial myocytes, which was also a potential mechanism of increased incidence of AF (27). Finally, part of AMI patients complicated with FHG is due to DM and DM is associated with an increased risk of subsequent AF (28, 29). Other FHG patients may be with a higher incidence of metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is also associated with the risk of AF (30).
There was sufficient clinical evidence to show that either hyperglycemia or new-onset AF were correlated with poor prognosis in patients with AMI (2–5, 9–11); pre-diabetes was also reported as an important risk factor for all-cause mortality (31). However, there are no data concerning whether hyperglycemia combined with new-onset AF adds more weight to a poor prognosis in AMI patients. In this study, we found AMI patients with either FHG or AF showed higher all-cause mortality, and patients with both FHG and AF increased three times risk of all-cause mortality after adjusting other confounding risk factors. This may guide our clinical practice: if FHG can be controlled to a certain level, it may decrease the incidence of new-onset AF and long-term all-cause mortality. Larger sample sizes and prospective clinical trials are needed to clarify this problem in the future.
Limitations
There are several limitations of this study. First, it is a single center retrospective cohort study and it has the defect of missing follow-up. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to explore the relationship between FG and new-onset AF in patients with AMI. Second, as an observational study, we could not exclude residual confounders, despite being adjusted for potential covariates as much as possible. Finally, we record new-onset AF only by ECG, which may underestimate the incidence of AF in the real world. However, the incidence of new-onset AF in our study is similar to other previous studies (9, 11–13).
Conclusions
FHG was an independent risk factor for new-onset AF in patients with AMI. AMI patients complicated with FHG and new-onset AF showed worse in-hospital and long-term all-cause mortality than those with FHG or AF alone.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics committee on Clinical scientific research and laboratory animal of Zhongshan People's Hospital. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
Author Contributions
ML wrote and edited the manuscript. YG, KG, ZW, YL, and JL collected the research data for the article. LF, JD, XH, and YY reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Policeman Defeng Wang for his great help in follow-up information collection.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- AMI
acute myocardial infarction
- AF
atrial fibrillation
- FHG
fasting hyperglycemia
- NFHG
non- fasting hyperglycemia
- FG
fasting glucose
- DM
diabetes mellitus.
References
- 1.Kosiborod M, McGuire DK. Glucose-lowering targets for patients with cardiovascular disease: focus on inpatient management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. (2010) 122:2736–44. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.913368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Gerstein HC. Stress hyperglycaemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic overview. Lancet. (2000) 355:773–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08415-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stranders I, Diamant M, van Gelder RE, Visser FC. Admission blood glucose level as risk indicator of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. (2004) 164:982–8. 10.1001/archinte.164.9.982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ishihara M, Kojima S, Sakamoto T, Kimura K, Kosuge M, Asada Y, et al. Comparison of blood glucose values on admission for acute myocardial infarction in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. (2009) 104:769–74. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fujino M, Ishihara M, Honda S, Kawakami S, Yamane T, Nagai T, et al. Impact of acute and chronic hyperglycemia on in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. (2014) 12:1789–93. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Esposito K, Nappo F, Marfella R, Giugliano G, Giugliano F, Ciotola M, et al. Inflammatory cytokine concentrations are acutely increased by hyperglycemia in humans: role of oxidative stress. Circulation. (2002) 106:2067–72. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000034509.14906.AE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Risso A, Mercuri F, Quagliaro L, Damante G, Ceriello A. Intermittent high glucose enhances apoptosis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells in culture. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. (2001) 281:E924–30. 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.5.E924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stegenga ME, van der Crabben SN, Levi M, de Vos AF, Tanck MW, Sauerwein HP, et al. Hyperglycemia stimulates coagulation, whereas hyperinsulinemia impairs fibrinolysis in healthy humans. Diabetes. (2006) 55:1807–12. 10.2337/db05-1543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Podolecki T, Lenarczyk R, Kowalczyk J, Kurek T, Boidol J, Chodor P, et al. Effect of type of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in acute myocardial infarction treated invasively. Am J Cardiol. (2012) 109:1689–93. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pizzetti F, Turazza FM, Franzosi MG, Barlera S, Ledda A, Maggioni AP, et al. Incidence and prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: the GISSI-3 data. Heart. (2001)86:527–32. 10.1136/heart.86.5.527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zusman O, Amit G, Gilutz H, Zahger D. The significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. Clin Res Cardiol. (2012) 101:17–22. 10.1007/s00392-011-0357-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rathore SS, Berger AK, Weinfurt KP, Schulman KA, Oetgen WJ, Gersh BJ, et al. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrial fibrillation in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes. Circulation. (2000) 101:969–74. 10.1161/01.CIR.101.9.969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wong CK, White HD, Wilcox RG, Criger DA, Califf RM, Topol EJ, et al. New atrial fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction independently predicts death: the GUSTO-III experience. Am Heart J. (2000) 140:878–85. 10.1067/mhj.2000.111108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jons C, Jacobsen UG, Joergensen RM, Olsen NT, Dixen U, Johannessen A, et al. The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy. Heart Rhythm. (2011) 8:342–8. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Maagh P, Butz T, Wickenbrock I, Prull MW, Plehn G, Trappe HJ, et al. New-onset versus chronic atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: differences in short- and long-term follow-up. Clin Res Cardiol. (2011) 100:167–75. 10.1007/s00392-010-0227-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stamboul K, Fauchier L, Gudjoncik A, Buffet P, Garnier F, Lorgis L, et al. New insights into symptomatic or silent atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. (2015) 108:598–605. 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huxley RR, Filion KB, Konety S, Alonso A. Meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. (2011) 108:56–62. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Staszewsky L, Cortesi L, Baviera M, Tettamanti M, Marzona I, Nobili A, et al. Diabetes mellitus as risk factor for atrial fibrillation hospitalization: incidence and outcomes over nine years in a region of Northern Italy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2015) 109:476–84. 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Aune D, Feng T, Schlesinge S, Riboli E, Janszky I, Norat T, et al. Diabetes mellitus, blood glucose and the risk of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Diabetes Complications. (2018) 32:501–11. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kaneko H, Itoh H, Kiriyama H, Kamon T, Fujiu K, Morita K, et al. Fasting plasma glucose and subsequent cardiovascular disease among young adults: analysis of a nationwide epidemiological database. Atherosclerosis. (2021) 319:35–41. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jensen PN, Thacker EL, Dublin S, Psaty BM, Heckbert SR. Racial differences in the incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2013) 61:276–80. 10.1111/jgs.12085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Robinson LE, van Soeren MH. Insulin resistance and hyperglycemia in critical illness role of insulin in glycemic control. AACN Clin Issues. (2004) 15:45–62. 10.1097/00044067-200401000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mulvihill NT, Foley JB. Inflammation in acute coronary syndromes. Heart. (2002) 87:201–4. 10.1136/heart.87.3.201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, et al. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose flutuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. (2006) 295:1681–7. 10.1001/jama.295.14.1681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Crenshaw BS, Ward SR, Granger CB, Stebbins AL, Topol EJ, Califf RM. Atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: the GUSTO-I experience. Global utilization of streptokinase and TPA for occluded coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1997) 30:406–13. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00194-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee SH, Chen YC, Cheng CC, Higa S, Chen YJ, Chen SA. Hypertonicity increases rabbit atrium and pulmonary vein arrhythmogenesis: a potential contributor to the genesis of atrial fibrillation. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. (2009) 36:419–24. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.05085.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Otake H, Suzuki H, Honda T, Maruyama Y. Influences of autonomic nervous system on atrial arrhythmogenic substrates and the incidence of atrial fibrillation in diabetic heart. Int Heart J. (2009) 50:627–41. 10.1536/ihj.50.627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Shrader P, Thomas L, Gersh BJ, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, et al. Care patterns and outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients with and without diabetes: ORBIT-AF registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 70:1325–35. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang A, Green JB, Halperin JL, Piccini JP. Atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 74:1107–15. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cai X, Zheng S, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Lu J, Huang Y. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation. Liver Int. (2020) 40:1594–600. 10.1111/liv.14461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cai X, Zhang Y, Li M, Wu JH, Mai L, Li J. Association between prediabetes and risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: updated meta-analysis. BMJ. (2020) 370:m2297. 10.1136/bmj.m2297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.