Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Jul 15;10(28):e00361-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00361-21

Whole-Genome Sequences of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense Isolates from Brazil

Edson Machado a,#, Fernanda Cristina Oliveira a,#, Rafael Silva Duarte b, Ana Carolina Carvalho b,c, Pedro Henrique Campanini Cândido b, Emilyn Costa Conceição b,d,e, Lia Gomes e, Sidra E G Vasconcellos e, Fabrice Santana Coelho b,f, Solange Vinhas g, Maria Cristina Lourenço d, Ana Carolina R Guimarães h,✉, Marcos Catanho a,✉, Philip Noel Suffys e,✉
Editor: David Raskoi
PMCID: PMC8280865  PMID: 34264116

ABSTRACT

The Mycobacterium abscessus complex comprises multidrug-resistant, opportunistic, and rapidly growing pathogens responsible for severe infections. Here, we report the genome composition of four Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense isolates from three sources: two from the lung of a cystic fibrosis patient, one from a mammary cyst, and one from a gutter system.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC) is so far composed of three subspecies: Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense, Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii, and Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus (1). Although common in soil and water, they are frequent (opportunistic) human pathogens associated with a broad spectrum of diseases, ranging from pulmonary to superficial skin and soft tissue infections to severe disseminated infections in immunocompromised patients (2, 3), such as those with cystic fibrosis, among other chronic lung diseases (4).

Infections caused by the MABSC are becoming more prevalent worldwide (5), including in Brazil, which has reported 2,128 skin and soft tissue infections since 2004, with significant outbreaks (6). The effective treatment of infections caused by the MABSC is challenged by the high resistance to antibiotics displayed by these organisms (5, 7).

Here, we announce the genome sequencing of four clinical strains of M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (MAB1 to MAB4) isolated in Brazil. The samples were processed with N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NALC)-NaOH and 5% oxalic acid decontamination (8) and cultured in Lowenstein-Jensen medium in an incubator at 35°C for 7 days. All isolates were tested for susceptibility against amikacin (AMK), ciprofloxacin (CIP), doxycycline (DOX), tobramycin (TOB), clarithromycin (CLR), cefoxitin (CXT), moxifloxacin (MFX), linezolid (LZD), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SXT) using the MIC protocol according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (9) performance standards for susceptibility testing for rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM).

MAB1 was isolated from a sewer wastewater station in the city of Vitoria, Espírito Santo State, in 2009 and demonstrated drug resistance to CIP, DOX, and TOB. MAB2 and MAB4 were isolated from sputum samples from the same patient with cystic fibrosis in November 2009 and May 2010, respectively. MAB2 was resistant to CIP, CLR, DOX, TMP-SXT, and MFX; MAB4 was resistant to the same drugs except that it showed susceptibility to CLR. The exact reason for this was not investigated but might be due to heteroresistance and isolation of a different fraction of the population on both occasions. Isolate MAB3 was from a biopsy specimen from a cyst that developed after implantation of a mammary prosthesis in 2003 and presented no drug resistance (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Genomic features and accession numbers of the Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense isolates sequenced

Isolate Source Drug resistance profilea BioSample accession no. GenBank accession no. SRA accession no. No. of reads Genome size (bp) Genome completeness (%) No. of contigs N50 (bp) Genome coverage (×) GC content (%)
MAB1 Sewer water CIP (R, 4.0); DOX (R, 32.0); TOB (R, 16.0) SAMN16557383 JADEYL000000000 SRS8489819 20,332,477 5,232,272 100.00 190 161,580 777 64.0
MAB2 Sputum CIP (R, 4.0); DOX (R, >32.0); MFX (R, 4.0); CLR (R, >64.0); TMP-SXT (R, 4.0/76) SAMN16557407 JADEYM000000000 SRS8489820 8,243,873 4,966,199 100.00 71 191,720 332 64.2
MAB3 Mammary cyst biopsy specimen Pan-susceptible SAMN16557408 JADEYN000000000 SRS8489821 1,658,365 5,051,696 99.05 654 14,176 66 64.1
MAB4 Sputum CIP (R, 4.0); DOX (R, 32.0); MFX (R, 8.0); TMP-SXT (R, 4.0/76) SAMN16557409 JADEYO000000000 SRS8489822 3,842,124 4,962,832 100.00 79 155,714 155 64.2
a

R, drug resistance; CIP, ciprofloxacin; DOX, doxycycline; TOB, tobramycin; CLR, clarithromycin; MFX, moxifloxacin; TMP-SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Genomic DNA was obtained from the Lowenstein-Jensen culture using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) phenol-chloroform-based extraction and sequenced using the Nextera XT library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform with 2 × 150-bp paired-end reads.

The raw reads were evaluated using FastQC v.0.11.9 (10) and filtered and trimmed using Trimmomatic v.0.36 (11) (LEADING:3, TRAILING:3, SLIDINGWINDOW:3:28, HEADCROP:19, and MINLEN:40). The genome sequences were de novo assembled using SPAdes v.3.11.1 (12), and the assembly quality was evaluated using Quast v.5.0.2 (13) and CheckM v.1.1.2 (14), applying the lineage analysis workflow. Annotation was performed using NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v.4.3 (15). No plasmids were found in the four samples analyzed, according to the PlasmidSeeker v.1.3 tool (16). Default parameters were applied unless otherwise specified.

In summary, the genome size ranged from 4.96 to 5.23 Mb with samples harboring 4,932 to 5,469 genes, roughly representing a difference of 6% in size and 10% in gene content (Table 1). The environmental isolate displayed the largest genome sequence.

Data availability.

The genomic sequences are publicly available in NCBI under the BioProject accession number PRJNA672126.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was approved by the Brazilian Ethics Committee and Regional Committee (213/08-CEP HUCFF UFRJ).

A.C.R.G., M.C., and P.N.S. conceived and designed the experiments. F.C.O. and E.M. performed the in silico experiments. F.C.O., E.M., A.C.R.G., M.C., and P.N.S. analyzed the data. A.C.C., S.V., E.C.C., M.C.L., F.S.C., and P.H.C.C. were responsible for the sample collection, strain isolation, conventional and molecular identification, and drug susceptibility testing. F.C.O., E.M., A.C.R.G., M.C., and P.N.S. contributed to the manuscript writing.

Contributor Information

Ana Carolina R. Guimarães, Email: acarol.guimaraes@gmail.com.

Marcos Catanho, Email: mcatanho@gmail.com.

Philip Noel Suffys, Email: psuffys@gmail.com.

David Rasko, University of Maryland School of Medicine.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lee M-R, Sheng W-H, Hung C-C, Yu C-J, Lee L-N, Hsueh P-R. 2015. Mycobacterium abscessus complex infections in humans. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1638–1646. doi: 10.3201/2109.141634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tortoli E. 2003. Impact of genotypic studies on mycobacterial taxonomy: the new mycobacteria of the 1990s. Clin Microbiol Rev 16:319–354. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.319-354.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wee WY, Dutta A, Choo SW. 2017. Comparative genome analyses of mycobacteria give better insights into their evolution. PLoS One 12:e0172831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shearing V, Duff AJA, Denton M. 2015. Mycobacterium abscessus in people with cystic fibrosis: considerations for psychosocial care. Lancet Respir Med 3:832–834. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00431-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Everall I, Nogueira CL, Bryant JM, Sánchez-Busó L, Chimara E, Duarte RDS, Ramos JP, Lima KVB, Lopes ML, Palaci M, Kipnis A, Monego F, Floto RA, Parkhill J, Leão SC, Harris SR. 2017. Genomic epidemiology of a national outbreak of post-surgical Mycobacterium abscessus wound infections in Brazil. Microb Genom 3:e000111. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leão SC, Viana-Niero C, Matsumoto CK, Lima KVB, Lopes ML, Palaci M, Hadad DJ, Vinhas S, Duarte RS, Lourenço MCS, Kipnis A, das Neves ZC, Gabardo BMA, Ribeiro MO, Baethgen L, de Assis DB, Madalosso G, Chimara E, Dalcolmo MP. 2010. Epidemic of surgical-site infections by a single clone of rapidly growing mycobacteria in Brazil. Future Microbiol 5:971–980. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carneiro MDS, Nunes LDS, de David SMM, Barth AL. 2017. Lack of association between rrl and erm(41) mutations and clarithromycin resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus complex. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 112:775–778. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760170080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brasil Ministério da Saúde. 2008. Manual nacional de vigilância laboratorial da tuberculose e outras micobactérias, 1st ed. Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica, Brasília, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.CLSI. 2018. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardiae, and other aerobic actinomycetes, 3rd ed. CLSI document M24-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Andrews S. 2015. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  • 11.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roosaare M, Puustusmaa M, Möls M, Vaher M, Remm M. 2018. PlasmidSeeker: identification of known plasmids from bacterial whole genome sequencing reads. PeerJ 6:e4588. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genomic sequences are publicly available in NCBI under the BioProject accession number PRJNA672126.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES