Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):e15655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15655

Peripheral Artery Disease as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction

Erick Leonel Pérez Mejias 1, Sila Mateo Faxas 1, Nicole Tejeda Taveras 2, Abdul Subhan Talpur 3,, Jitesh Kumar 4, Maria Khalid 5, Suraj K Aruwani 6, Dua Khalid 6, Haya Khalid 6, Sidra Memon 6
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8280959  PMID: 34277248

Abstract

Introduction: Atherosclerosis contributes to the underlying pathophysiology for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and cerebrovascular disease. Several studies have been conducted to demonstrate PAD as a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events, however, the regional data are limited. This study aims to highlight PAD as a major risk factor in CV events in a local setting.

Methods: In this longitudinal study, 400 hypertensive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAD were enrolled from the outpatient department of the cardiology unit. Diagnosis of PAD was made using the ankle brachial index (ABI). ABI less than 0.9 was labeled as participants with PAD. Another group of 400 without PAD was also enrolled as the control group from the outpatient department of cardiology unit. Patients were followed up for 12 months or for the development of myocardial infarction (MI).

Result: Participants with PAD had a significant increased risk of total MI events with a relative risk (RR) of 1.67 (confidence interval, CI 95%: 1.05-2.66; p-value: 0.02). The RR for fatal MI was 2.62 (CI 95%: 0.94-7.29; p-value: 0.06) compared to the participants without PAD, however, it was not significant.

Conclusion: This study has focused on the risk factors of PAD and has suggested that the patients who have any of the mentioned risk factors should be treated with caution under strict instructions given by doctors. A variety of treatment options is available, but the initial changes should be made in the lifestyle of these patients, making sure the risk factors are being treated.

Keywords: peripheral artery disease, risk factor, myocardial infarction, association, fatal myocardial infarction

Introduction

Atherosclerosis contributes to the underlying pathophysiology for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and cerebrovascular disease [1]. This condition is characterized by a diseased endothelium, low-grade inflammation, lipid accumulation, and plaque formation within the intima of the vessel wall [2]. Rupture of the plaque can provoke superimposed atherothrombosis as well as occlusion of the vessel wall, which leads to the development of cardiovascular (CV) events including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, limb ischemia, and CV death [3]. Disease in more than one arterial bed is associated with the worst prognosis [4]. However, the prognosis can be improved through secondary preventive measures, with lifestyle changes and medicinal control of modifiable CV risk factors [5].

Several studies have been conducted to demonstrate PAD as a major risk factor for CV events. According to the 2016 study, the global burden of CV disease due to PAD was estimated to be 25.6% and 1.7% of the overall global burden of the disease [6]. Reduced quality of life (QOL) was predominantly associated with patients with PAD because of the functional limitations caused by the symptoms. In the European Union and the United States National Health and Wellness Survey, it was reported that patients with PAD had a lower mental and physical health-related QOL [7]. Major adverse CV events are associated with PAD. Blin et al. revealed that within a year of MI, PAD was the most important factor in predicting the risk of re-infarction, stroke, or transient ischemic attack [8].

This study aims to highlight PAD as a major risk factor in CV events. This further emphasizes the coping strategies and follows the secondary measures to improve the QOL in patients with PAD.

Materials and methods

This longitudinal study was conducted from April 2019 to February 2021 in the cardiology unit of a tertiary care hospital. We enrolled 400 hypertensive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAD from the outpatient department of cardiology via consecutive convenient non-probability sampling. Diagnosis of PAD was made using the ankle brachial index (ABI). ABI less than 0.9 was labeled as participants with PAD. Another set of 400 participants without PAD were also enrolled from the outpatient department as the control group.

The patient’s characteristics such as age, gender, history of smoking, blood pressure, previous and family history for MI were noted in a self-structured questionnaire. Patients were followed up for 12 months or until the development of MI, whichever came first. MI was diagnosed based on symptoms, electrocardiogram (ECG), and cardiac enzymes. 

Participants lost to follow-up in groups with and without PAD were 47 and 43, respectively. Only participants who completed the study were included in the final analysis. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version. 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA). Continuous variables were analyzed via descriptive statistics and were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) while categorical variables were presented as percentages and frequencies. Relative risk (RR) was calculated via an online calculator (MedCalc Software Ltd., Acacialaan 22, 8400 Ostend, Belgium) using a 95% confidence interval (CI). A p-value of less than 0.05 meant that there is a difference between the two groups and the null hypothesis is void.

Results

Seven hundred and ten (710) participants completed the study, 353 and 357 participants with and without the PAD group, respectively. There was no difference in demographics and the risk factor profile between the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the study participants.

BMI, body mass index; MI, myocardial infarction; NS, non-significant; PAD, peripheral artery disease; SD, standard deviation

Characteristics Participants with PAD (n= 353) Participants without PAD (n= 357) p-value
Age in year (mean ±SD) 47 ± 11 48 ± 10 0.20
Male (%) 201 (56.9%) 198 (55.5%) 0.69
Smoking (%) 121 (34.2%) 127 (35.5%) 0.71
Diabetes (%) 178 (50.4%) 182 (50.9%) 0.88
Hypercholesterolemia 213 (60.3%) 221 (61.9%) 0.66
BMI greater than 25 kg/m2 (%) 98 (27.7%) 101 (28.2%) 0.87
Previous history of acute MI (%) 25 (7.0%) 17 (4.7%) 0.19
Family history of acute MI (%) 10 (2.8%) 12 (3.3%) 0.68

Participants with PAD had a significant increased risk of total MI events with a RR of 1.67 (CI 95%: 1.05-2.66; p-value: 0.02). The RR for fatal MI was 2.62 (CI 95%: 0.94-7.29; p-value: 0.06) compared to the participants without PAD, however, it was not significant (Table 2).

Table 2. Classification of MI in participants with and without PAD.

NNH, number needed to harm; MI, myocardial infarction; PAD, peripheral artery disease

MI Participants with PAD (n=353) Participants without PAD (n=357) Relative risk (CI 95%) NNH p-value
Total MI   43 (12.1%) 26 (7.2%) 1.67 (1.05-2.66) 20.4 0.02
Non-fatal MI   30 (8.4%) 22 (6.1%) 1.37 (0.81-2.34) 42.8 0.23
Fatal MI   13 (3.6%) 4 (1.1%) 2.62 (0.94-7.29) 43.8 0.06

Discussion

In our study, both groups did not show any significant differences in their demographics. Risk factors namely smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, BMI greater than 25 kg/m2, previous and family history of acute MI did not vary significantly.

Our results demonstrated that patients with PAD were reported to be at a greater risk of total and fatal MI, compared to those who did not have PAD. However, the trends were not significant for fatal MI. This may be due to a limited number of fatal events. These results are supported by the fact that PAD is known to be a potential cause of cerebrovascular and CV episodes along with higher mortality rates [9-11]. PAD is known to be associated with acute MI [11-13]. Our results have been supported by other studies [14-18] that stated that 9% of acute MI had a prior history of PAD, and PAD was mostly reported among those at a higher risk of having underlying diseases like hypertension, diabetes, and stroke [14, 19-21].

The major risk factors for PAD are smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, obesity, and a family history of vascular disease. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1999-2000 examined 2000 patients with PAD and concluded that approximately 95% of them had at least one of the mentioned risk factors, and up to 70% had more than two risk factors [22]. PAD patients who had diabetes and smoking habits were 2.5 times at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality [23]. Diabetes is known to be linked with accelerated atherosclerosis and increased episodes of cardiac events [24]. Novel risk factors include increased inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and plasma homocysteine [25]. Hyperhomocysteinemia is also an independent risk factor for PAD [26]. There are various strategies related to the treatment of PAD, including lifestyle modification, medical management, endovascular therapies, and surgical interventions. These strategies help in the management of claudication symptoms and secondary prevention of CV complications [27].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study from this South Asian region to study PAD as a risk factor for MI. However, since the study was conducted in a single center, care should be taken while inferring the result to a larger population. This study has focused on the risk factors of PAD and has suggested that the physician should treat the patients who have any of the mentioned risk factors with caution under strict instructions.

Conclusions

Peripheral arterial disease is known to potentially cause a global burden by leading to MI. However, our study is of the idea that by tracing the risk factors, PAD could be treated even before the onset of complications. Therefore, proper screening and safe treatment options could help in the long term. Moreover, to ensure the effectiveness of the treatment, check-ups should be done at regular intervals.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences issued approval LUMHS/IRB-Ofc/2019/02-04

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. Libby P. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2004–2013. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1216063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK. Nature. 2011;473:317–325. doi: 10.1038/nature10146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rivaroxaban: a new treatment paradigm in the setting of vascular protection? Bauersachs R, Zannad F. Thromb Haemost. 2018;118:0. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1636530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Wilson PW, et al. JAMA. 2007;297:1197–1206. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Planning secondary prevention: room for improvement. Cortés-Beringola A, Fitzsimons D, Pelliccia A, Moreno G, Martín-Asenjo R, Bueno H. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24:22–28. doi: 10.1177/2047487317704954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burden of peripheral arterial disease in Europe and the United States: a patient survey. Marrett E, DiBonaventura Md, Zhang Q. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:175. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Outcomes following acute hospitalised myocardial infarction in France: an insurance claims database analysis. Blin P, Philippe F, Bouée S, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2016;219:387–393. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.The peripheral arterial disease study (PERART/ARTPER): prevalence and risk factors in the general population. Alzamora MT, Forés R, Baena-Díez JM, et al. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:38. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and co-morbidity in 6880 primary care patients: cross-sectional study. Diehm C, Schuster A, Allenberg JR, et al. Atherosclerosis. 2004;172:95–105. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(03)00204-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in patients with previous cerebrovascular or coronary event. Mehlsen J, Wiinberg N, Joergensen BS, Schultz-Larsen P. Blood Press. 2010;19:308–312. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2010.491178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts) Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. Atherosclerosis. 2012;223:1–68. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, et al. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1769–1818. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peripheral artery disease and outcomes after myocardial infarction: an individual-patient meta-analysis of 28,771 patients in CAPRICORN, EPEHESUS, OPTIMAAL and VALIANT. Inglis SC, Bebchuk J, Al-Suhaim SA, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:1094–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Association of peripheral artery disease with treatment and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Froehlich JB, Mukherjee D, Avezum A, et al. Am Heart J. 2006;151:1123–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The influence of peripheral arterial disease on outcomes: a pooled analysis of mortality in eight large randomized percutaneous coronary intervention trials. Saw J, Bhatt DL, Moliterno DJ, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1567–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prior polyvascular disease: risk factor for adverse ischaemic outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. Bhatt DL, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, et al. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:1195–1202. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Presenting symptoms, pre-hospital delay time and 28-day case fatality in patients with peripheral arterial disease and acute myocardial infarction from the MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry. Kirchberger I, Amann U, Heier M, Kuch B, Thilo C, Peters A, Meisinger C. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24:265–273. doi: 10.1177/2047487316676123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peripheral arterial disease in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome in six middle eastern countries. Al-Thani HA, El-Menyar A, Zubaid M, et al. Int J Vasc Med. 2011;2011:815902. doi: 10.1155/2011/815902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Usefulness of the presence of peripheral vascular disease in predicting mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty (from the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Database) Guerrero M, Harjai K, Stone GW, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:649–654. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome patients with peripheral arterial disease treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel: data from the PLATO Trial. Patel MR, Becker RC, Wojdyla DM, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22:734–742. doi: 10.1177/2047487314533215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000. Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Circulation. 2004;110:738–743. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000137913.26087.F0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Meta-analysis of the association between cigarette smoking and peripheral arterial disease. Lu L, Mackay DF, Pell JP. Heart. 2014;100:414–423. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Meta-analysis: glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Selvin E, Marinopoulos S, Berkenblit G, Rami T, Brancati FL, Powe NR, Golden SH. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:421–431. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N. JAMA. 2001;285:2481–2485. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Atherosclerotic vascular disease conference: writing group II: risk factors. Smith SC Jr, Milani RV, Arnett DK, et al. Circulation. 2004;109:2613–2616. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128519.60762.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Evidence-based medical management of peripheral artery disease. Bevan GH, White Solaru KT. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:541–553. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES