Ultrasonic desulfurization of amphiphilic magnetic-Janus nanosheets in oil-water mixture system

Highlights

• •Changing Fenton reagent from uniparental to amphiphilic by Amphiphilic Janus material.
• •Supporting the Production of Hydroxyl Radicals by Ultrasound.
• •Improving the oxidative desulfurization ability and reusability of Fenton reagent.

Abstract

Fe₃O₄ was obtained by reacting FeCl₂ and FeCl₃ with polyethylene glycol, and labeled onto a amphiphilic Janus nanosheet. It was confirmed by infrared spectroscopy, SEM, AFM and EDS that the Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles changed from hydrophilic to amphiphilic. The oxidative desulfurization performance of amphiphilic iron oxide was studied. Results showed that the Janus nanosheets labeled with Fe₃O₄ could significantly improve the removal rate of thiophene sulfide in simulated oil synergistically with ultrasonic waves, and the desulfurization rate could reach 100%. Further, the effect of ultrasound on the sensing ability of the oil–water interface was studied and the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient was calculated. In addition to the desulfurization mechanism of Fe₃O₄, it was found that although the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient of the amphiphilic nanosheets was high, the number of hydroxyl radicals determined the desulfurization efficiency. The amphiphilic Fe ions were more favorable for the formation of hydroxyl radicals than the single hydrophilic ones.

1. Introduction

China's major oil fields employ tertiary oil recovery processes, which include injection technology, technology for heavy oil, and thermal recovery. There is a need to add a variety of emulsifiers to maintain high oil–water emulsion stability of the oilfield wastewater [1]. Moreover the standards for sulfur content in fuel oil, produced from crude oil, are becoming more and more stringent [2]. Therefore, it is necessary to desulfurize the oil phase while separating the oil from water. Amongst the existing technologies for desulfurization, hydrodesulfurization has reached a higher industrial stage, but it fails to remove benzothiophene sulfide due to its steric effect [3], [4], [5]. Oxidative desulfurization, as a non-hydrodesulfurization technology, is especially suitable for deep desulfurization of oil–water systems due to its excellent selectivity, mild reaction conditions and strong adaptability to raw materials [6], [7], [8].

Solid Fe₃O₄ and H₂O₂ synergistically formed a Fenton-type reagent, which could oxidize and desulfurize the oil in a better manner, but the hydrophilic and oleophobic property of Fe₃O₄ limited its application in desulfurization in oil–water mixture. The use of an amphiphilic Janus material as the surfactant increased the contact of iron ions with the oil layer and hydrogen peroxide (water layer) , and improved the oxidative desulfurization efficiency of the Fenton-type reagent for oil–water mixture [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].

The stability of plate-like particles stabilized emulsion is higher than that of other structural particles [14]. Compared with spherical Janus particles, the rotation of Janus films with anisotropic structure at the emulsion interface is restricted, so the plate-like particles are more stable than the spherical particles in the shape of the emulsion.

Ultrasound-assisted desulfurization [15] of oil can obviously improve the desulfurization rate [16], [17], [18].Therefore, based on the Janus nanomaterials, this study marked the Janus nanosheets with Fe₃O₄, which gave oxidative properties to the Janus nanomaterials. This material realized the removal of sulfur from the oil–water system by means of ultrasonic waves, providing a theoretical basis for the efficient separation and treatment of oilfield wastewater.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Reagents and instruments

Imidazoline-based Janus nanosheets were procured from the Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Analytically pure dibenzothiophene was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Analytically pure n-octane, methyl violet, hydrogen peroxide (30% H₂O₂), and N, N-dimethylformamide were purchased from Shenyang Dongxing Reagent Factory.

Infrared spectra was recorded on a Bruker Equinox 55FT-IR infrared spectrometer (Bruker Beijing Technology Co., Ltd.). SEM images were obtained using a JSM6335 scanning electron microscope, JEOL. Thickness of nanosheets was determined by Asylum Research(AFM) MFP-3D-BIO(Oxford Instrument Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.). The instrument to produce ultrasonic radiations was homemade [9]. The absorbances were recorded on a Tp-xos-type visible spectrophotometer (Tianjin Tuopu Instrument Co., Ltd.). Y-800 high shear homogenizer was used to mix the emulsion (Shanghai Shihe Instrument Co., Ltd.).

2.2. Experimental methods

2.2.1. Synthesis of Janus nanosheets [5]

The specific synthesis process is as follows [9]:The 15 mL styrene maleic anhydride copolymer aqueous solution (12 wt%) was mixed evenly in 80 mL deionized water, and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 2.5 by adding acetic acid. The aqueous solution was placed in a 75 °C water bath at constant temperature as the water phase (solution I). Take 25 g of paraffin and melt at 75 °C. Ethyl orthosilicate, aminopropyl trimethoxysilane and phenyl triethoxysilane with mass ratio of 5.6:1:4.5 were added into paraffin wax and mixed evenly (solution II). The solution I and II were mixed and shear emulsified at high speed with high shear homogenizer, the emulsification speed was 10000 rpm, the emulsification time was 6 min, the O/W emulsion was formed, and the emulsion reacted for 12 h at 75 °C. Hollow spheres were obtained after filtration, washing and drying. Janus nanosheets were prepared by grinding with colloid for 20 min.

2.2.2. Synthesis of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles [7]

Prepare 100 mL 5 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution, deoxidize with nitrogen for 1 h, add 11 mL 0.5 mol/L FeCl₂ solution and 10 mL 1 mol/L FeCl₃ solution, stir for 1 h at room temperature, and the reaction is in the N₂ atmosphere. Then heat up to 900 °C, continue stirring for 1 h, add 100 mL 0.3 mol/L sodium citrate solution, continue stirring for 30 min, and finally precipitate with acetone. Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles were separated by magnet, washed with distilled water for many times and dried in vacuum.

2.2.3. Labeling of Janus nanosheets

The appropriate amount of Janus nanoparticles was dispersed in ethanol, 10 mg Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles were added, stirred for 30 min, and the Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles which were not adsorbed on Janus were removed. The results were observed by SEM.

2.2.4Preparation of simulated oil

Dibenzothiophene (0.8193 g) was weighed and dissolved in n-octane. It was diluted with n-octane to 50 mL, in a volumetric flask. It had a sulfur content of 7 × 10^-4 mol/L.

2.3. Sample performance and characterization methods

Small amounts of each of the two samples (Fe₃O₄ and F-J) were mixed thoroughly with potassium bromide powder, which were then tableted and analyzed by infrared spectrometry. The morphology of Janus nanosheets was studied by scanning electron microscopy, which was performed on a copper mesh carbon film after ultrasonically dispersing in ethanol for 20 min.

2.4. Desulfurization performance evaluation

In a conical flask equipped with a condenser, hydrogen peroxide (30%, 4 mL), deionized water (4 mL), acetic acid (1 mL), H₂O₂(10 mL), F-J nanosheets (0.10 g), and simulated oil (8 mL) were added successively. The oil content of the mixture was about 50%. The mixture was placed in ultrasonic machine and reacted at 20 °C for 30 min. In the above conditions, F-J nanosheets (0.10 g) can be replaced by Fe₃O₄(0.10 g),(Formic acid(2 mL) + Sulfuric acid(2 mL)) [19].

The experimental conditions without ultrasonic were as follows: In a conical flask equipped with a condenser, hydrogen peroxide (30%, 4 mL), deionized water (4 mL), acetic acid (1 mL), H₂O₂(10 mL), F-J nanosheets (0.10 g) (or Fe₃O₄(0.10 g)), and simulated oil (8 mL) were added successively. The oil content of the mixture was about 50%. The mixture was placed at 20 °C for 30 min with the homogenizer.

N, N-dimethylformamide (10 mL) was added and then extracted for 15 min. After standing for 10 min, the sulfur content was determined.

2.5. Determination of hydroxyl radicals

Then methyl violet solution (2 mmo1·L⁻¹, 0.5 mL) was added. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 3.5. The blank sample was a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and n-octane

After reacting at room temperature for 10 min, the absorbance values of X and Y were measured spectrophoto metrically at 580 nm, with water as the reference. The absorbance was recorded asAtand the absorbance values of Z were recorded as A₀. The absorbance △A can be determined using the Eq. (1):

△A = A₀-A_t (1)

According to Lambert Beer's law (Eq. (2)):

△A = ɛ × b × △C (2)

where, ɛ is the molar extinction coefficient or molar absorptivity; b is the length of the solution the light passes through (cm); and C is the concentration of the solution. The number of •OH generated is represented by △C, which is proportional to △A. Hence, the larger the value of ΔA, more is the concentration/ number of •OH [9].

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterization of Janus and F-J nanosheets

3.1.1. Infrared analysis

Fig. 1 shows the infrared spectra of Fe₃O₄, Janus nanosheets, and F-J samples. Comparison of the spectra shows that the modified Fe3O4 had the characteristic peaks of both, Fe₃O₄ and Janus nanosheets, which indicated that iron oxide was successfully labeled on the Janus nanosheets.

Fig. 1.

IR spectra of three samples.

3.1.2. Surface topography analysis

The Janus nanosheets were labeled with Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles (Fig. 2).Unloaded Janus nanosheets have a smooth surface and a thickness of about 40 nm. Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles were adsorbed on the side of Janus nanosheet with —NH₂ group, resulting in rough surface. Fe₃O₄ had prominence (Fig. 2(c)) and bright spot (Fig. 2(d)), and EDX analysis (Table 1) showed that there were Fe elements on Janus sheet with a mass fraction of 3.47%. It was proved that the prepared Janus sheet material was loaded with Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles.

Fig. 2.

SEM photos of nanosheets: a) and b)Janus;c) and d) F-J.

Table 1.

EDX element analysis of Janus hollow sphere after being labeled with Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles.

Element	Si	O	N	C	Fe
Mass fraction/%	52.47	36.56	3.78	3.72	3.47

3.1.3. Emulsifying and demulsifying properties

Fig. 3 shows that the F-J nanoparticles with amphiphilic properties can be mixed into emulsions with simulated oil and water evenly. After the magnetic field is applied, Fe₃O₄ is attracted by magnetic force, so that the emulsion is demulsifying and is easy to recover and separate.

Fig. 3.

Emulsification and demulsification of F-J nanosheets using simulated oil and water as oil/water phases:a)emulsification; b)demulsification.

3.2. Ultrasonic attenuation coefficient

Ultrasound is sensitive to oil–water interface [8], [1], [20]. Fe₃O₄ is hydrophilic, it forms oil–water stratified flow in the oil and water phases. While F-J is amphiphilic, so it forms oil in water core flow in the oil and water phases. Two different fluid systems lead to different ultrasonic attenuation coefficient. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the ultrasonic attenuation coefficients of the two systems.

The principle of ultrasonic measurement of oil–water biphasic flow was based on hydrodynamic and thermodynamic effects, which are shown in Fig. 4. The ultrasonic waves were emitted from the ultrasonic transmitting end with a certain frequency and intensity, which passed through the flowing oil–water phases. After phase absorption and other attenuation mechanisms, the ultrasonic waves reached the receiving end of the ultrasonic signal [3], [16], [20].

Fig. 4.

Testing mechanism of ultrasonic attenuation.

The ultrasonic attenuation coefficient can be determined using the Eq. (3):

ln(U/U₀) = ln(1 + R)– αx (3)

In Eq. (3), U₀ and U are the acoustic intensity (sound pressure) of the transmitting and receiving end of the ultrasonic wave respectively; R is the emission coefficient; α is the attenuation coefficient of the ultrasonic wave; x is the volume ratio of oil to water.

The transmitting end adopted the structural–acoustic coupling. The sensor had a diameter of 7 mm and the ultrasonic frequency transmitted was 500 kHz. The pressure of sound was 500 kPa. The receiving end received the attenuated signal through a two-dimensional intercept line.

The main simulation parameters were set as follows: temperature of 293.15 K, water density of 1000 kg•m⁻³, water sound speed of 1500 m•s⁻¹, n-octane density of 703 kg•m⁻³, and n-octane sound speed of 1300 m•s⁻¹. The simulation obtained the ultrasonic sound pressure distribution in the measured field (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Distributions of sound pressure in water-in-oil core flow.

The ultrasonic attenuation coefficients of the two systems were measured. The value in Fig. 5 (a) was 12.08 dB•m⁻¹, which was larger than that in Fig. 5 (b) (7.95 dB•m⁻¹). This was due to the fact that in Fig. 5 (a) the oil–water interface and the transmitting end of the ultrasonic wave propagation direction was at a certain angle, there would be scattering effect, the attenuation loss of ultrasonic wave in addition to the propagation loss in the medium, the energy loss caused by scattering was relatively high. In Fig. 5 (b), because the propagation direction of ultrasonic wave was perpendicular to the oil–water interface, the scattering effect was relatively weak. The attenuation loss of ultrasonic wave was mainly the propagation loss in the medium, and the energy loss was relatively low. Therefore, to a large extent, the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient was affected by the distribution of oil and water two-phase medium.

3.3. Desulfurization ability

3.3.1. Desulfurization rate

In order to study the performance of oxidative desulfurization of Fe₃O₄, a comparative experimental study was designed. The reaction conditions and desulfurization effects are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Comparison of desulfurization effectiveness in different reaction systems.

Desulphurization system	Desulphurization rate /%
F-J / ultrasonic	100%
Fe3O4/ ultrasonic	88%
Formic acid + sulfuric acid/Ultrasonic	79%
F-J	60%
Fe3O4	45%

The desulfurization effect on the reaction system on addition of 0.10 g F-J (0.03 g Fe₃O₄) and sonication was most obvious, which could reach 100%. On the other hand, ultrasonic desulfurization rate with 0.03 g of Fe₃O₄, Formic acid + sulfuric acid/ultrasound, only F-J and only Fe₃O₄ were 88%, 79%,60%,45%, respectively.

Obviously, ultrasonic desulfurization using F-J was more effective, which also indicated that ultrasonication promoted desulfurization. In this process, Fe₃O₄ was always present at the interface between the two phases, due to the amphiphilic nature of Janus. Under the action of ultrasonic waves, Fe ions with high catalytic activity, constantly promoted the formation of hydroxyl radicals in hydrogen peroxide. Thiophene (non-polar) was oxidized to disulfoxide (polar), which then dissolved in water and was removed.

The schematic diagram for oxidative desulfurization of F-J nanosheets at the oil–water interface is shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The schematic diagram of oxidative desulfurization of F-J nanosheet at the interface. After ultrasonication for 30 min, dibenzothiophene was adsorbed and oxidized to polar disulfoxide at the oil–water interface, which was dissolved in the aqueous phase.

3.3.2. Hydroxyl radicals

Although the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient of the F-J system was large, its desulfurization effect was larger than that of the Fe₃O₄ system. This indicated that the ultrasonic attenuation phenomenon had little effect on desulfurization, under the premise that the ultrasonic intensity was satisfied. The oxidative desulfurization capacity of the system was determined by the number of hydroxyl radicals [14], [21], [22].

According to the experimental method of 1.6, the principle was that methyl violet was purple in acidic solution with pH ≥ 3.0, and •OH could easily attack high electron density points. Therefore, •OH and —C = C— in methyl violet with high electron density could undergo an electrophilic addition reaction to cause the methyl violet to fade. The results of the changes in absorbances of the solutions after treatment with different systems are shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Comparison of desulfurization effectiveness in different reaction systems.

System name	A	△A
The blank sample system	—0.004	0.004
Fe3O4 system	—0.058	0.058
F-J system	—0.069	0.069

It can be seen from Table 3 that the order of •OH content was consistent with the order of desulfurization rate, indicating that the number of •OH in the ultrasonic-Fe-oil–water system determined the desulfurization efficiency, and the amphiphilic Fe ion was more favorable for the generation of •OH free radicals.

3.3.3. Reuse performance

In industrial applications, recycling efficiency is an important index for evaluating the performance of a catalyst. For this reason, we take F-J nanosheets as an example to explore the reusability of F-J nanosheets in the process of emulsification oxidation desulfurization. The results are shown in Fig. 7. When the desulfurization experiment is finished, the demulsification of the desulfurization system is realized by applying an external magnetic field, and the upper oil phase is dumped. The catalyst F-J was added to the round-bottom flask, and the model oil was added to start the next cycle of ultrasonic-assisted desulfurization experiments. After five desulfurization experiments, the desulfurization rate remained 99.5%. The experimental results showed that the Janus nanosheets loaded with Fe₃O₄ could be achieved under the condition of self-stabilization during repeated experiments.

Fig. 7.

Reuse performance of catalyst F-J.

4. Conclusions

Fe₃O₄ was obtained by reacting FeCl₃·6H₂O with sodium acetate, glycol, ethylenediamine and labeled on the amphiphilic Janus nanosheet, which converted the hydrophilic nature of Fe₃O₄ to amphiphilic. The performance of oxidative desulfurization of modified iron oxide was studied. Experiments showed that the synergistic effects of F-J and ultrasound could significantly improve the removal rate of thiophene sulfide in simulated oil, and the desulfurization rate increased by 18%, which means that it could achieve 100% desulfurization.

The sensing ability of ultrasonic waves at the oil–water interface was studied and the attenuation coefficient was calculated. In addition to the desulfurization mechanism of Fe₃O₄, it was found that the •OH content determined the desulfurization efficiency, and the amphiphilic Fe ion was more favorable for the generation of •OH free radicals.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.