Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254685

The role of customer experience in the effect of online flow state on customer loyalty

Adnan Veysel Ertemel 1,2, Mustafa Emre Civelek 1, Güzide Öncü Eroğlu Pektaş 2,*, Murat Çemberci 3
Editor: Dejan Dragan4
PMCID: PMC8282012  PMID: 34264997

Abstract

Purpose

The Internet revolution has radically changed the means of conducting business all over the world in the past few decades. The digital medium enables consumers worldwide to shop online through B2C e-commerce websites in a convenient manner. Online websites compete to provide a compelling and seamless brand experience to retain their customers. In order to achieve this, fostering a state of flow may help the brands increase customer experience, customer satisfaction and loyalty. In this study, the aforementioned phenomenon is tested against Turkish university students.

Methodology

The study was conducted against 538 valid respondents. The results of the survey were interpreted with the structural equation modeling method. Quantitative data were obtained using a five-point Likert scale. Initially, confirmatory factor analyses and reliability analysis were performed, respectively in order to determine the validity and reliability of the scale.

Findings

As a result of the analyses, it has been empirically proven that an online flow state, which is a momentary phenomenon, helps online e-commerce websites build customer satisfaction and customer loyalty indirectly through customer experience. These results are partly parallel with those in the extant literature.

Originality

This study is significant in the literature in that, as opposed to the extant literature, online flow state is found to influence customer satisfaction and customer loyalty rather indirectly via moderating effect of customer experience. Additionally, it is the first to incorporate customer satisfaction along with customer loyalty as a new construct affected by online flow state and customer experience. The results also have important managerial implications.

1. Introduction

The highly competitive new marketing environment of the 21st century calls for new approaches for marketers for appealing to their customers. This is because consumer behavior is evolving at an unprecedented pace. The Internet is an evolving technology, which has facilitated the development of new business relationships among brands and their customers [14]. The brands now have a much more convenient way to reach their consumers and benefit more in online context [5].

As today’s fragmented, highly digitized marketplaces have become more complex than ever, engaging new generation consumers have become more of a concern. Therefore, many of the old marketing strategies turn out to be ineffective and new marketing strategies emerge that appeal rather to the unconscious. These strategies require consumers to spend minimum mental effort, which makes them feel in a flow state [6], get entertained without realizing how the time passes by [7] and focus more on the experiential aspects of consumption [8]. The aforementioned strategies are so effective in engaging consumers that they can even result in addictive behaviors [911]. As such, these marketing strategies enable the marketers to foster higher levels of involvement [12]. In terms of attaining this goal, flow theory is an important theory that enables the marketers to achieve a high level of involvement, especially in an online setting. In this regard, e-commerce is a perfect medium that enables consumers to order their necessities of all assortments with just a few clicks. Furthermore, the recent covid-19 pandemic has further accelerated the adoption of e-commerce worldwide. Over the last years, the importance of the online flow state has been emphasized to build a better customer experience.

In this study, the youth segment was chosen as the target group to measure the flow experience in e-commerce use in Turkish consumers’ consumption patterns. This particular sample group was chosen because of the high potential of this group and the higher mobile usage rates of young people In Turkey. Even though online flow is a popular concept studied in various contexts, the effect of online flow state on the longer-term phenomenon is not probed in the extant literature except for the one done in a narrow scope by Shim, Forsythe, Kwon [13]. Considering this fact, this study makes a unique contribution to the literature by incorporating both customer satisfaction and customer loyalty as being affected by online flow state directly or indirectly through brand experience.

2. Conceptual background

In this study, the relationship among online flow state, customer satisfaction, customer experience and customer loyalty are analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method.

The initial model is depicted in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Theoretical model.

Fig 1

2.1. Flow state

Flow state is defined as a fully immersed state experienced when someone is totally involved in an activity [6]. It is such a state that nothing else seems to matter to the individual [14] and causes the individual to experience a loss-of-control and centering of attention at the same time. Optimum flow state, also known as autotelic experience is the state in which the individual’s skills are fully involved in overcoming a significant but manageable challenge [15].

2.1.1 Online flow state

Online flow state, on the other hand, can be defined as a totally absorbing, fully engaging online experience state [16, 17]. It can be described as a multidimensional construct that encompasses sense of being in control, intrinsic enjoyment, sense of time distortion and tele-presence [18]. Online flow can occur in various online activities including but not limited to e-commerce [19], e-learning environments and online gambling [18]. In the e-commerce context, online flow can be seen as the extent to which consumers are engaged in interacting with the brand-related stimuli [13]. As it becomes harder for the brands to engage new generation consumers, the importance of online flow in customer experience becomes more prevalent. Various studies on online flow in recent years can be shown as an indicative of increased attention on the phenomenon [9, 12, 13, 18].

2.2. Customer satisfaction

Customer satisfaction is defined as a customer’s overall judgment on disconfirmation between the expected and perceived service performances [20]. If the perceived performance meets or exceeds the expectation, the customer is satisfied; otherwise, the result will be dissatisfaction [21].

Customer satisfaction is a transaction-specific measure, which means that a customer evaluates his/her perception of performance relative to expectation in each service encounter, independently of the other occasions [2226].

Satisfying their customers is one of the ultimate goals that e-businesses seek due to the long-term benefits of having satisfied customers such as positive word of mouth comment, customer loyalty, and sustainable profitability [2729].

Customer satisfaction is a critical factor for customer loyalty and customer satisfaction [30]. The prerequisite of customer loyalty is to ensure satisfaction. According to some researchers, e-customer satisfaction is due to website features. In this perspective, it has been found that concrete elements, responsiveness, interaction and stability have a significant impact on customer satisfaction in the online context [31]. In today’s highly competitive online marketplace, high level of service performance is a differentiator in competition, and an effective way to improve customer satisfaction and loyalty [32]. In order to obtain high level of customer satisfaction, high service quality is needed, which often leads to favorable behavioral intentions [33].

2.3. Customer experience

Customer experience is the subjective feeling that stays after the user purchases a product or service, aiming to manage the processes of experiences as perceived by customers in their relationship with the brands [34]. Brands reinforce these subjective feelings to activate their customers’ five senses in their efforts to enhance customer experience [35]. Customer experience is of critical importance in various sectors including hospitality [32] and online services [3638]. Chase and Dasu [39] suggest that the sole reason for employment of behavioral science by brands is to enhance the customer experience.

When a customer buys an experience, he/she pays money for a series of events to spend enjoyable time, which will stick in mind just like a play performed on stage of a theatre [40]. Some authors argue that customer experience will be the next competitive battlefield for businesses [41]. Both online and offline consumers are looking at five categories when shopping, namely; location, convenience, knowledge, personality and price [42]. Studies conducted by Nisar and Prabhakar [43] and the one conducted by Gentile, Spiller, Noci [44] pointed out that, the sensory, emotional, cognitive pragmatic, lifestyle and relational situations of the customer affect the experience. All of these factors cause the customer experience to be perceived differently by consumers.

2.4. Customer loyalty

Customer loyalty is defined as a customer’s attitude to the service [22, 33, 45]. In addition, it is formed by a customer’s cumulative experience with the service over time, not by a specific service encounter [20, 4649]. Customer loyalty is very essential to the organization in order to retain its current customers [50, 51].

Loyalty of a firm’s customer has been recognized as the dominant factor in a business organization’s success. [52]. Customer loyalty is very essential to the organization in order to retain its current customers [51]. Loyalty is mainly expressed in terms of revealed behavior [53]. Customer’s repurchase behavior is estimated as a basic requisite for loyalty that is followed by satisfaction [54]. By understanding the importance of customer loyalty, an organization can build commitment by having existing customers re-purchase their products and services [5557].

3. Hypothesis development and research model

3.1. The relationship between flow state and customer satisfaction

Many studies in the extant literature shows a significant positive influence of flow state on customer satisfaction in various contexts including hospitality [58, 59] and sports [60, 61] industries. Hoffman and Novak [18] had also compiled the results of various studies on the effect of the flow state on other constructs. Kim and Han [14] found out that customers understand and enjoy mobile marketing messages more as they are fully absorbed and totally focused on flow state, and that this high involvement flow state facilitates purchase intentions including but not limited to customer satisfaction.

  • Thus, in the light of the extant literature, we can hypothesize that;

  • H1: Flow State has a positive effect on Customer Satisfaction

3.2. The relationship between flow state and customer loyalty

Since an online flow state represents an optimal state that is joyful and entertaining, it is meaningful to evaluate it as a phenomenon that ultimately leads to customer loyalty. Hausman and Siekpe [16] found that flow affects online consumers’ return intention and thus loyalty. Zhou, Li, Liu [62] found that online flow has a significant effect on users’ loyalty in mobile social networking sites. Smith and Chen [63], on the other hand, indicate that brand experience sub constructs affect branding efforts, which paves the way to brand loyalty.

Previously, Luna, Peracchio, de Juan [64] found out that online flow experience could lead to ‘sticky’ web sites. Sticky, in this context, means that the website captures consumers’ attention in such a way that consumers spend prolonged periods of time on the site because of the compelling nature of the experience [18].

Likewise, Bilgihan [65] indicated optimal flow state as an important precedent to loyalty in the e-commerce environment. Although online flow state is a momentary, rather short-term experience, some scholars argue that it also helps improve brand experience and customer loyalty in the long term [13].

  • Thus, we can hypothesize that;

  • H2: Flow State has a positive effect on Customer Loyalty

3.3. The relationship between flow state and customer experience

Schembri [66] pointed out that online flow contributes to the experiential meaning of a brand ultimately enhancing customer brand experience. Similarly, Shim, Forsythe, Kwon [13] and Müller, Flores, Agrebi, Chandon [67] suggests that unlike other traditional channels, a brand’s website can deliver an interactive, optimal and extraordinary flow experience that ultimately helps create a positive overall customer experience.

Shim, Forsythe, Kwon [13] argues that the reason behind this can be explained by the fact that the online flow state is related to all sensory, intellectual, behavioral and affective dimensions of the brand experience. For example, online flow can be understood as a state where the individual is fully concentrated, implying that all visual and auditory senses are highly active in this state. This intense state of mind also triggers brain activity that implies the intellectual brand experience.

Additionally, the tele-presence dimension of online flow state implies an effect on behavioral brand experience. Lastly, autotelic experience in online flow state helps the building of effective brand experience.

  • Therefore, we can hypothesize that;

  • H3: Flow State has a positive effect on Customer Experience

3.4. The relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty

Many studies have been undertaken to date to examine the relationship between customer satisfaction, service performance and customer loyalty in a variety of service industries, including tourism [68, 69], medical [70, 71], and telecommunications [26, 72] industries. The majority of these studies have found substantial causal links between service performance, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty [26]. The opportunity to bond with consumers and the realization of a brand’s emotional characteristics can overcome the pervasive instability that exists in online environments [73, 74]. Brand loyalty can decrease switching behavior and increase consumer retention rate [75]. Brand loyalty has also been linked to repeat purchase behavior [63].

Repeat purchase behavior helps the realization of loyalty. If the customer prefers that particular brand even if there are similar brands available, then this demonstrates that loyalty has been established. In order for loyalty to be established, the recurring customer satisfaction should take place without any exceptions and be free of bad experience.

Hence, in the light of the extant literature, we can formulate the following hypothesis;

  • H4: Customer Satisfaction has a positive effect on Customer Loyalty

3.5. The relationship between customer experience and customer loyalty

Considering consumer brand loyalty is generally established on the basis of long-term and close interactions between a customer and a brand, previous studies [7678] have revealed a link between customer experience and customer loyalty. Some studies indicate that a positive customer experience can greatly boost brand loyalty [73, 79]. Lin and Kuo [80] found that consumers’ loyalty intentions are affected by their recent purchases, suggesting that a positive brand customer experience may be the key to strong customer loyalty.

Brakus [81] conceptualized customer experience as a multidimensional construct and suggest that all kinds of customer experiences have the potential to affect customer loyalty.

  • Thus, we can formulate the following hypothesis.

  • H5: Customer Experience has a positive effect on Customer Loyalty

3.6. The relationship between customer experience and customer satisfaction

The extant literature suggests that a superior customer experience helps build customer satisfaction [81, 82]. This phenomenon is also verified in e-commerce context by previous studies [73, 83]. Schmitt, Brakus, Zarantonello [84] further indicates that the strength of customer experience could affect customer satisfaction.

  • Thus, in the light of the we can formulate hypothesis.

  • H6: Customer Experience has a positive effect on Customer Satisfaction

4. Research methods

Quantitative data were collected by means of the questionnaire designed in a five-point Likert scale. Firstly, confirmatory factor analyses and reliability analysis were conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the scale. Structural Equation modeling as a multi variable statistical technique was employed to test the hypotheses of the theoretical model [85].

This technique was used to understand the indirect and direct effects in the theoretical model [86] and to decrease measurement errors [87]. The analyses were performed with SPSS and AMOS statistics programs.

4.1. Measures and sampling

The scales taken from previous research measured the dimensions in the initial model of the study. The Likert scale in 5-point was used from a strong disagreement to strong acceptance.

The questionnaire was distributed to more than 700 individuals residing in Turkey via an online from. The survey was conducted in Turkish, among university students residing in 7 biggest cities in all geographical regions in Turkey, namely; İstanbul, İzmir, Antalya, Samsun, Ankara, Erzurum, Diyarbakır. The online questionnaire was accepted only from those adults with their explicit consent and who had previously purchased online in the past 12 months. 538 valid questionnaires from individuals were collected. 334 of the respondents were female and the remaining 204 respondents were male. In order to measure flow state, the scale suggested by Bilgihan, Okumus, Nusair, Bujisic [88] with 8 questions was used. In order to measure customer satisfaction, the scale suggested by Oliver [89] was used. The scale suggested by Brakus [81] was utilized to measure customer experience. Finally, the scale developed by Yoo and Donthu [90] was employed to measure brand loyalty.

4.2. Construct validity and reliability

At the beginning, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used for the data purification process. So as to understand convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was utilized. This analysis was applied on the remaining 13 items [91]. The findings of the CFA determined the fit of the structural model. The Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square Test shows compliance with the original model and the acquired model [92]. χ2/DF was found as 2.856. This χ2/DF ratio is under the limit point of 3. Additionally, other fit indices also show acceptable results (i.e. CFI = 0.959, IFI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.059).

Table 1 shows the CFA Results. As provided in the table, standardized factor loads for each item are obtained as significant (larger than 0.5). Average variance extracted values were near or above the limit point (i.e. 0.5) [87].

Table 1. Confirmatory factor analysis results.

Variables Items Standardized Unstandardized Factor Loads
Factor Loads
Customer Satisfaction (CSA) CSA0222 0.495 1
CSA0525 0.738 1.174
CSA0121 0.764 1.176
CSA0323 0.814 1.240
CSA0626 0.785 1.273
Customer Experience (CEX) CEX0715 0.571 1
CEX1018 0.756 1.211
CEX1220 0.579 0.964
Customer Loyalty (CLY) CLY0127 0.647 1
CLY0228 0.793 1.172
CLY0329 0.787 1.194
Flow State (FLS) FLS0404 0.623 1
FLS0505 0.776 1.126

p<0.01 for all items.

These results proved the convergent validity of the constructs. To appraise discriminant validity, the square roots of AVE values of each variable were obtained. In Table 2, the diagonals indicate the square root of AVE values. The reliability of each structure was calculated separately. Composite reliability and Cronbach α values are near or more than the limit point which is recommended as 0.7 [93].

Table 2. Construct descriptives, reliability and correlation.

Variables 1 2 3 4
1. Customer Satisfaction (.728)
2. Customer Experience .589* (.641)
3. Customer Loyalty .465* .468* (.745)
4. Flow State .253* .306* .149* (.703)
Composite reliability .846 .673 .788 .660
Average variance ext. .530 .411 .556 .495
Cronbach α .826 .683 .783 .657

*p < 0.05.

Note: Values in diagonals are the square root of AVEs.

Descriptive statistics of the dimensions, Cronbach α and composite reliabilities, average variance extracted values and Pearson correlations among the dimensions are presented in Table 2.

4.3 Test of the hypotheses

Maximum likelihood estimation method was utilized to test the hypotheses. It is the main estimation method of covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM). CB-SEM is a confirmatory method [86]. Therefore, in this research, it is used to confirm the hypotheses, which are developed by depending upon the base theories. To assess the structural model, the goodness of fit indices were utilized.

The absolute goodness of fit indices are the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and the χ2 goodness of fit statistic.

  • Note: χ2/DF = 2.356, CFI = 0.970, IFI = 0.970, RMSEA = 0.050

The relative goodness of fit indices are incremental fit index (IFI) and comparative fit index (CFI). As Fig 2 shows, fit indices structural regression model satisfactorily determines fit of the model. χ2/DF value is 2.356 and between limit points (i.e. between 2 and 5). CFI is 0.970, IFI is 0.970. RMSEA is 0.050. These are adequate values. The results of the hypothesis tests are summarized in Table 3.

Fig 2. Results of the SEM analysis.

Fig 2

Table 3. Hypotheses test results.

Relationships Standardized Coefficients Unstandardized Coefficients Hypotheses Results
FLS → CSA 0.023 0.018 H1 Not Supported
FLS → CLY -0.004 -0.005 H2 Not Supported
FLS → CEX 0.306 0.295 H3 Supported
CSA → CLY 0.276 0.410 H4 Supported
CEX → CLY 0.269 0.314 H5 Supported
CEX → CSA 0.709 0.558 H6 Supported

*p < 0.05.

5. Analysis results

H1 hypothesis is not supported. This means FLS does not have a direct effect on CSA. H2 hypothesis is not supported. This means FLS does not have a direct effect on CLY. H3 hypothesis is supported, which means that FLS has a direct effect on CEX. H4 hypothesis is supported. This indicates that CSA has a direct effect on CLY. H5 hypothesis is supported. This means that CEX has a direct effect on CLY. H6 hypothesis is supported, which means that CEX has a direct effect on CSA.

The results indicate that online flow state does affect brand experience directly, and customer loyalty and customer satisfaction indirectly through the mediating effect of brand experience.

6. Discussion

The related studies on the effect of flow state on customer satisfaction find a direct, positive influence [5961]. The analysis results of this study also find such a positive relationship according to the Pearson correlation table. However, the SEM analysis results indicate that there is an indirect effect of the flow state on customer satisfaction through the mediating role of customer experience. Thus, this study makes a significant contribution to the literature by highlighting this relationship in online context in e-commerce environment. Based on these results, it can be implied that online flow state, which is a momentary experience–is one that occurs at a specific time, does not directly affect a long-term phenomenon like customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. However, since online flow state results in a better overall brand experience, it does help build better customer loyalty and satisfaction through improved total brand experience. This result has significant managerial implications. Online website visitors have ever increasing expectations of being immersed with exceptional experiences that let them have a feeling of distortion in time and space [15] without requiring them to think about unnecessary details [7]. This is especially true in today’s highly fragmented, fairly busy daily lives characterized by the attention economy [94]. In such an environment, consumers are being bombarded with various stimuli coming from all sources and thus have difficulty paying their scarce and valuable time and attention to any of those stimuli. Therefore, online flow state can be thought of an escape from this daily routine and therefore, is being valued more by today’s consumers. The results signify that investment to provide consumers with a seamless experience that makes them feel in the flow not only helps the brands have their customers entertained, but this seamless experience does also help improve brand loyalty and customer satisfaction in the long run.

As for the customer loyalty dimension, the results of the study can be said to conform with the results as found by Shim, Forsythe, Kwon [13]. However, this paper also makes a significant contribution to the literature by studying and validating a positive relationship between the online flow state and customer satisfaction (in addition to customer loyalty) through brand experience.

7. Conclusion

Triggered by the covid-19 pandemic, e-commerce adoption rates accelerated even more due to the increased adoption of online medium. During these tough times, it has become more important than ever for e-businesses to provide seamless experiences and build long-lasting, profitable relationships with their customers.

The results of the present study demonstrate that online flow state as perceived by customer trust of university students in Turkey influences their satisfaction and loyalty towards e-commerce websites indirectly through customer experience.

The online flow state aims at creating a totally absorbing, engaging experience with a brands’ website. Naturally, this experience is expected to happen momentarily.

Therefore, it is not expected to affect long-term phenomena such as customer loyalty and customer satisfaction considering theoretically. Although online streaming has been studied from different angles, it cannot be said that the number of studies investigating the effect of online streaming on total brand experience, customer loyalty and customer satisfaction is not high in the current literature, except for a study by Shim, Forsythe, Kwon [13]. However, that study investigated only the flow- brand experience- loyalty relationships.

This study has aimed at adding to the extant research by incorporating customer satisfaction dimension and analyzing the direct and indirect effect of all of those construct’s phenomenon together using structured equation modeling.

The findings of the present study have important managerial implications. The results imply that fostering a flow state shouldn’t be viewed as a nice-to-have feature in an e-commerce setting. But rather, doing so does help the e-commerce brands achieve their longer-term objectives. The moment a customer enters an online platform for a product, the amount of time he / she spends there and the pleasure derived all have critical importance with regard to customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. During the flow state, customized and personalized offerings, influential visual designs on the online platforms yield a more important customer experience than purchasing experience in facilitating the shopping process and rendering it an enjoyable one. In sum, the websites that keep the customer in the flow will be preferred more.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(SAV)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its S1 Data file.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Petersen B, Welch SL, Liesch PW. The internet and foreign market expansion by firms. MIR: Management International Review. 2002; 42(2): 207–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835918 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hinson RE, Adjasi CKD. The Internet and export: Some cross-country evidence from selected African countries. Journal of Internet Commerce. 2009; 8(3–4): 309–324. doi: 10.1080/15332860903467730 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rayport JF, Sviokla JJ. Managing in the marketspace. Harvard Business Review. 1994; 72(6): 141–50. https://hbr.org/1994/11/managing-in-the-marketspace [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mathews S, Bianchi C, Perks K, Healy M, Wickramasekera R. Internet marketing capabilities and international market growth. International business review. 2016; 25(4): 820–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.10.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tiago MT, Tiago F. Revisiting the impact of integrated internet marketing on firms’ online performance: European evidences. Procedia Technology. Conference on enterprise information systems, HCIST 2012, International Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies. 2012; 5: 418–26. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ertemel AV. Dijital Çağda illüzyonel pazarlama. Istanbul: Abaküs Yayın. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brakus JJ, Schmitt BH, Zhang S. Experiential attributes and consumer judgments. Editors: Schmitt B, Rogers D. Handbook on Brand and Experience Management: The Role of Agriculture in Poverty Reduction. 2008. 10.4337/9781848446151 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marczewski A. The ethics of gamification. XRDS: Crossroads. The ACM Magazine for Students. 2017; 24(1): 56–9. doi: 10.1145/3123756 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ertemel AV, Ari EA. Marketing approach to a psychological problem: Problematic smartphone use on adolescents. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020; 17(7): 2471. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ertemel AV, Aydın G. Dijital ekonomide teknoloji bağımlılığı ve çözüm önerileri. Addicta-The Turkish Journal on Addictions. 2018; 5(4): 683–90. doi: 10.15805/addicta.2018.5.4.0038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brodie RJ, Ilic A, Juric B, Hollebeek L. Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of business research. 2013; 66(1): 105–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shim SI, Forsythe S, Kwon WS. Impact of online flow on brand experience and loyalty. Journal of electronic commerce research. 2015; 16(1): 56. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim HS, Yoon CH. Determinants of subscriber churn and customer loyalty in the Korean mobile telephony market. Telecommunications policy. 2004; 28(9–10): 751–65. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2004.05.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi MF. The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial New York. 1991; 41. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hausman AV, Siekpe JS. The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. Journal of business research. 2009; 62(1): 5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iglesias O, Singh JJ, Batista-Foguet, JM. The role of brand experience and affective commitment in determining brand loyalty. Journal of Brand Management. 2011; 18(8): 570–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoffman DL, Novak TP. Flow online: lessons learned and future prospects. Journal of interactive marketing. 2009; 23(1): 23–4. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bridges E, Florsheim R. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience. Journal of Business research. 2008; 61(4): 309–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Anderson EW, Sullivan MW. The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing science. 1993; 12(2): 125–143. doi: 10.1287/mksc.12.2.125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kotler P, Lane Keller K. Marketing Management. 14e Global Edition, Person. Jakarta: PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Design Ramaswamy R. and management of service processes: keeping customers for life. Prentice Hall. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bitner MJ. Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of marketing. 1990; 54(2): 69–82. doi: 10.1177/002224299005400206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bolton RN, Drew JH. A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service quality and value. Journal of consumer research. 1991; 17(4): 375–84. doi: 10.1086/208564 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LS. A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.1988; 64(1): 12–40. doi: 10.1007/BF02180021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim MK, Park MC, Jeong DH. The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications policy. 2004; 28(2): 145–59. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2003.12.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Greenwell TC, Fink JS, Pastore DL. Assessing the influence of the physical sports facility on customer satisfaction within the context of the service experience. Sport Management Review. 2002; 5(2): 129–148. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(02)70064-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu Y, Jang SCS. The effects of dining atmospherics: An extended Mehrabian–Russell model. International journal of hospitality management. 2009, 28(4): 494–03. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.01.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.El-adly MI. Modelling the relationship between hotel perceived value, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2019; 50: 322–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kotler P. Reconceptualizing marketing: an interview with Philip Kotler. European Management Journal. 1994; 12(4): 353–61. doi: 10.1016/0263-2373(94)90021-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Amin M. Internet banking service quality and its implication on e-customer satisfaction and e-customer loyalty. International journal of bank marketing. 2016; 34(3): 280–306. doi: 10.1108/IJBM-10-2014-0139 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim JH, Ritchie JR, Tung VWS. The effect of memorable experience on behavioral intentions in tourism: A structural equation modeling approach. Tourism Analysis. 2010; 15(6): 637–648. doi: 10.3727/108354210X12904412049776 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim KJ, Jeong IJ, Park JC, Park YJ, Kim CG, Kim TH. The impact of network service performance on customer satisfaction and loyalty: High-speed internet service case in Korea, Expert Systems with Applications. 2007; 32:822–31. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dirsehan T. Müşteri deneyimi tasarımı ve yönetimi. Hiperlink eğit. ilet. yay. san. tic. ve ltd. sti., 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Karadeniz M, Eroğlu Pektaş GÖ, Topal K. The effects of experiential marketing and service quality on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty at shopping centers. Journal of naval science and engineering, 2013; 9(1): 46–66. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jnse/issue/9998/123514?publisher=msu;?publisher=msu; [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF. Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing science. 2000; 19(1): 22–42. doi: 10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rose S, Clark M, Samouel P, Hair N. Online customer experience in e-retailing: an empirical model of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of retailing. 2012; 88(2): 308–322. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2012.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kuppelwieser VG, Klaus P. Measuring customer experience quality: the EXQ scale revisited. Journal of Business Research. 2021; 126: 624–633. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chase RB, Dasu S. Want to perfect your company’s service? Use behavioral science. Harvard business review. 2001; 79(6): 78–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pine BJ, Gilmore JH. The experience economy. Harvard Business Press. 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pine B, Joseph II, Gilmore JH. Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard business review. 1998; 76(4): 97–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Teixeira J, Patrício L, Nunes NJ, Nóbrega L, Fisk RP, Constantine L. Customer experience modeling: from customer experience to service design. Journal of Service Management. 2012; 23(3): 362–376. doi: 10.1108/09564231211248453 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nisar TM, Prabhakar G. What factors determine e-satisfaction and consumer spending in e-commerce retailing? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2017; 39:135. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.07.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gentile C, Spiller N, Noci G. How to Sustain the Customer Experience: An overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. European management journal. 2007; 25(5): 395–410. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stank TP, Goldsby TJ, Vickery SK. Effect of service supplier performance on satisfaction and loyalty of store managers in the fast-food industry. Journal of operations management. 1999; 17(4): 429–447. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00052-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Anderson EWC, Fornell B, Lehman DR. Customer satisfaction, market share and loyalty. Journal of marketing. 1994; 56: 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fornell C. A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of marketing. 1992; 56(1): 6–21. doi: 10.1177/002224299205600103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Innis DE, La Londe BJ. Customer service: the key to customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and market share. Journal of business Logistics. 1994; 15(1): 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reichheld FF, Sasser WE. Zero defeofions: Quoliiy comes to services. Harvard business review. 1990; 68(5): 105–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zakaria I, Rahman BA, Othman AK, Yunus NAM, Dzulkipli MR, Osman MAF. The relationship between loyalty program, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in retail industry: A case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 129: 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pektaş GÖE. Mağaza özellikleri açısından tüketicilerin mağaza sadakat düzeyinin belirlenmesi ve bir uygulama. Istanbul: Kriter Yayınevi. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kandampully J, Suhartanto D. Customer loyalty in the hotel industry: the role of customer satisfaction and image. International journal of contemporary hospitality management. 2000; 12(6): 346–351. doi: 10.1108/09596110010342559 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Uncles M, Dowling RG, Hammond K. Customer loyalty and customer loyalty programs. Journal of consumer marketing, 2007; 20(4): 294–316. doi: 10.1108/07363760310483676 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Punniyamoorthy M, Raj M, Prasanna M. An empirical model for brand loyalty measurement. Journal of targeting, measurement and analysis for marketing, 2007; 15(4): 222–233. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jt.5750044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhu DS, Lin CT, Tsai CH, Wu JF. A study on the evaluation of customers’satisfaction-the perspective of quality. International Journal for Quality research, 2010; 4(2): 1–12. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/82002 [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Oliver RL. Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of marketing,1999; 63(4): 33–44. doi: 10.1177%2F00222429990634s105 [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mcmullan R, Gilmore A. Customer loyalty: an empirical study. European journal of marketing. 2008; 42(9/10): 1084–1094. doi: 10.1108/03090560810891154 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hassan LFA, Jusoh WJW, Hamid Z. Determinant of customer loyalty in Malaysian Takaful Industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 130: 362–370. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ali F. Hotel website quality, perceived flow, customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Journal of hospitality and tourism technology. 2016; 7(2): 213–228. doi: 10.1108/JHTT-02-2016-0010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bai B, Law R, Wen I. The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: Evidence from Chinese online visitors. International journal of hospitality management. 2008; 27(3): 391–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.10.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.O’cass A, Carlson J. Examining the effects of website‐induced flow in professional sporting team websites. Internet research, 2010. doi: 10.1108/10662241011032209 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhou T, Li H, Liu Y. The effect of flow experience on mobile SNS users’ loyalty. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2010; 110(6) 930–946. doi: 10.1108/02635571011055126 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen J.; Smith R. E. The boundaries for ad creativity: effects of type of divergence and brand processing and responses. Journal of brand management. 2018; 25(6): 561–76. doi: 10.1057/s41262-018-0106-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Luna D, Peracchio LA, de Juan M.D. Cross-cultural and cognitive aspects of web site navigation. Journal of the academy of marketing science. 2002; 30(4): 397–410. doi: 10.1177/009207002236913 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bilgihan A. Gen Y customer loyalty in online shopping: An integrated model of trust, user experience and branding. Computers in human behaviour. 2016; 61: 103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Schembri S. Reframing brand experience: The experiential meaning of Harley–Davidson. Journal of Business Research. 2009; 62(12): 1299–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.11.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Müller B, Flores L, Agrebi M, Chandon JL. The branding impact of brand websites: do newsletters and consumer magazines have a moderating role? Journal of advertising research. 2008; 48(3): 465–472. doi: 10.2501/S0021849908080471 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Choi TY, Chu R. Determinants of hotel guests’ satisfaction and repeat patronage in the Hong Kong hotel industry. International journal of hospitality management. 2001; 20(3): 277–97. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4319(01)00006-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gundersen MG, Heide M, Olsson UH. Hotel guest satisfaction among business travelers: What are the important factors? Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly. 1996; 37(2): 72–81. doi: 10.1177%2F001088049603700222 [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Raju PS, Lonial SC, Gupta YP, Ziegler C. The relationship between market orientation and performance in the hospital industry: A structural equations modeling approach. Health Care Management Science. 2000; 3(3): 237–247. doi: 10.1023/a:1019061912075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Raju PS, Lonial SC. The impact of service quality and marketing on financial performance in the hospital industry: an empirical examination. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2002; 9(6): 335–348. doi: 10.1016/S0969-6989(02)00003-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gerpott TJ, Rams W, Schindler A. Customer retention, loyalty, and satisfaction in the German mobile cellular telecommunications market. Telecommunications policy. 2001; 25(4): 249–69. doi: 10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00097-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Morgan-Thomas A, Veloutsou C. Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience. Journal of Business Research. 2013; 66(1): 21–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Simmons GJ. I‐Branding: developing the internet as a branding tool. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2007; 25(6): 544–562. doi: 10.1108/02634500710819932 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Singh JJ, Iglesias O, Batista-Foguet JM. Does Having an Ethical Brand Matter? The influence of consumer perceived ethicality on trust, affect and loyalty. Journal of business ethics. 2012; 111(4): 541–549. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1216-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mascarenhas OA, Kesevan R, Bernacchi M. Lasting customer loyalty: a total customer experience approach. Journal of consumer marketing. 2006; 23(7): 397–405. doi: 10.1108/07363760610712939 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Meyer C, Schwager A. Understanding customer experience. Harvard business review. 2007; 85(2): 1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Brakus JJ, Schmitt BH, Zarantonello L. Brand experience: what is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of marketing. 2009; 73(3): 52–68. doi: 10.1509%2Fjmkg.73.3.052 [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bidenbach G, Marell A. The impact of customer experience on brand equity in a business-to-business services setting. Journal of brand management. 2010; 17(6): 446–58. doi: 10.1057/bm.2009.37 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lin CH, Kuo BZL. Escalation of loyalty and the decreasing impact of perceived value and satisfaction over time. Journal of electronic commerce research. 2013; 14(4): 348–362. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Brakus JJ. Embodied cognition, affordances and mind modularity: using cognitive science to present a theory of consumer experiences. Handbook on brand and experience management. 2008; 144–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Klaus PP, Maklan S. Towards a better measure of customer experience. International journal of market research. 2013; 55(2): 227–46. doi: 10.2501%2FIJMR-2013-021 [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ha HY, Perks H. Effects of consumer perceptions of brand experience on the web: Brand familiarity, satisfaction and brand trust. Journal of consumer behaviour: An international research review. 2005; 4(6): 438–52. doi: 10.1002/cb.29 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Schmitt H, Brakus J, Zarantonello, L. The current state and future of brand experience. Journal of Brand Management. 2014; 21(9): 727–33. doi: 10.1057/bm.2014.34 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Meydan CH, Şeşen H. Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi amos uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Civelek M. Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi metodolojisi. Istanbul: Beta. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications series). New York: Taylor & Francis Group. 2010; 396: 7384. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bilgihan A, Okumus F, Nusair K, Bujisic M. Online experiences: flow theory, measuring online customer experience in e-commerce and managerial implications for the lodging industry. Information Technology & Tourism. 2014; 14(1): 49–71. doi: 10.1007/s40558-013-0003-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Oliver RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research. 1980; 17(4): 460–469. doi: 10.1177%2F002224378001700405 [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yoo B, Donthu N. Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of business research. 2001; 52(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00098-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin. 1988, 103(3): 411–423. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bagozzi RP, Yi Youjae. Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1990; 75(5): 547–560. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.547 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research. 1981; 18(1): 39–50. doi: 10.1177%2F002224378101800104 [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Davenport TH. Mission critical: realizing the promise of enterprise systems. Harvard Business Press. 2000. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dejan Dragan

20 May 2021

PONE-D-21-08998

The Role of Customer Experience in the Effect of Online Flow State on Customer Loyalty

PLOS ONE

Dear Authors,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please see comments below.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 26 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dejan Dragan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for submitting the above manuscript to PLOS ONE. During our internal evaluation of the manuscript, we found significant text overlap between your submission and the following previously published works.

- https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-10-2014-0139

- https://coek.info/pdf-the-impact-of-e-service-quality-and-customer-satisfaction-on-customer-behavior-i.html

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.07.010

- http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/16_1_p04.pdf

We would like to make you aware that copying extracts from previous publications, especially outside the methods section, word-for-word is unacceptable, even for works which you authored. In addition, the reproduction of text from published reports has implications for the copyright that may apply to the publications.

Please revise the manuscript to rephrase the duplicated text, cite your sources, and provide details as to how the current manuscript advances on previous work. Please note that further consideration is dependent on the submission of a manuscript that addresses these concerns about the overlap in text with published work.

We will carefully review your manuscript upon resubmission, so please ensure that your revision is thorough.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 3 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

Additional Editor Comments:

The comments of the reviewers are diverse, from "minor revision" all the way to rejection of the paper. I suggest the authors to strictly follow all the reviewers' comments. AE DD

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Partly

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript was presented in an understandable fashion and written in standard English. It is well structured technically. The purposeful division of the material is to make it easier for the reader to understand the terms and easily find the issues of interest. The advantage of the article is the order of the content - the principle "from general to specific" was used here. The research hypotheses are well formulated and the findings provide a basis for answering them. Also noteworthy is the description of the research - clear and logical. It is evident that the authors understand the subject, pose the right questions and are able to answer them. The statistical analysis has been performed appropriately: quantitative data were collected by means of the questionnaire designed in a five-point Likert scale. Firstly, confirmatory faction analyses and reliability analysis were conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the scale. SEM as a multi variable statistical technique was employed to test the hypotheses. This technique was used to understand the indirect and direct effects in the theoretical model and to decrease measurement errors. The analyses were performed with SPSS and AMOS statistics programs. The authors also provided the necessary data on which the manuscript's conclusions are based. It is also worth noting the extensive literature that the authors used as a basis for preparing the article. The authors concluded their argument with a discussion and a well-designed conclusion. To sum up, this study makes a significant contribution to the literature by highlighting this relationship in online context in e-commerce environment. In addition to the theoretical layer, the article can provide application value for managers. The results indicate that investment to provide consumers with a seamless experience that makes them feel in the flow not only helps the brands have their customers entertained, but this seamless experience does also help improve brand loyalty and customer satisfaction in the long run.

Reviewer #2: The topic is interesting, however, I am sorry to say that I found little merit in this paper. The writing of this paper is quite superficial, and the proposed theory (flow theory) is not well-elaborated. In the introduction, the authors do not provide convincing arguments regarding the significance of this study, and they made insufficient effort to explain the rational of this study. In the literature section, the writing is quite descriptive and lacks the connection with the context of this study (section 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.2). In addition, the selected literatures are outdated, there are definitely some more recent studies on this topic. The data analysis seems reasonable, however, I don’t think these findings can bring much new knowledge to the field of e-commerce.

Reviewer #3: We think that article takes into consideration an interesting topic, that could have a special importance nowadays taking account of the profound transformations of consumption models under the pressure of COVID-19 pandemia. Online consumption becomes more and more present for larger mass of consumers and all the variables that can describe this phenomena deserves to be investigated as deeply as possible.

In order to achieve a proper level required for publication we strongly encouraged authors to take account off the following remarks/ requests:

1. Authors have to complete a supplementary review on English language in order to eliminate some minor typing errors. For example at line 57....”He brands now have......it should be: ..”The brand now have....

Also in line 187...” can build commitment in terms of”.....

Line 319, please correct the error:....”Firstly, confirmatory faction analyses”....

and so on...

2. The sample was reached using online communication, being targeted students, but authors should specify from what universities? Are there from a single city like Istanbul or are from different universities across Turkey?

Also it is advisable to present the structure of the sample (age, income etc - other descriptive variables used). In order to have a proper description of the sample authors can find a model within the following article: https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0031, at page 541.

3. Who is the sample representative of? students in general? Students only from the capital Istanbul?

4. As regarding the model, in order to have a proper explained methodology it is advisable to take into consideration more indicators / statistical tests (for example Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test etc). Authors can find a proper analysis and presentation for a similar model within the following article: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9780/pdf at page 8. The example also indicates the statistical values which are relevant for hypothesis validation.

5. Where does the information on value 3 related to “χ2 / DF” come from? See lines 351-352. Why are these indicators (referring to IFC, IFI, RMSEA) different at line 353 from the values at line 403 (and below lines 410-411)? What exactly does the note on line 403 refer to? Where should the note be placed? Under figure 2? The authors need to explain this passage more clearly.

6. Table 2 must be redone as a design - columns made wider to allow the text to be framed on a single line - the current form denotes negligence in terms of appearance for the finished version of the article.

Given that the Cronbach-Alpha values are not above 9 (which would have meant the immediate validation of the model), the table must be completed with the values of other coefficients (see the model for the article indicated above) that explicitly show this thing. What are the explicit values for p -value (Sig) for each of the 4 variables considered separately.

7. Figure 2, the one referring to the coefficients of the model, needs to be redone, in order to be more visible all the details of the figure - possibly it is recommended to import from SPSS or AMOS.

8. The model needs to be explained more clearly. What exactly do the notations in the model mean and what are the values for each item that are behind the four variables of the model?

9. The bibliography is old. Articles from the last 5 years should be considered mainly

10. To verify that the citations are unitary and fit into the policy of the journal.

To correct errors related to magazine names, for example line 550 - 559, all magazine names must be entered with

large initials, in a unitary way.

Avoid lack of rigor in this regard - for example - lines 645, 647, 648, 707, 754 (pages, volume, etc.) The references are a very important part of the article, being a subject for article rejection in many occasions.

Reviewer #4: I congrats the authors for the present study and I wish that the suggestions presented here might allow the authors to show the manuscritpt's full potential in the next opportunity.

Some suggestions:

1. Submit the paper to a English proofreading review.. Ex: Line 57 - "he brands..""

2. Introduction: a) The central objective of the paper is not clear stated in the introduction; b) the second paragraph seems to be overlapped by the third which is more well based on citation. Therefore, the introduction lacks of contextual facts to sustain the problem that the paper proposes to tackle. The authors assert that online flow is a " popular concept studied in various contexts in the literature", but it's not sufficiently proven the reasoning in the introduction neither in the literature review.

3. Conceptual background: a) I suggest that the mention of the usage of SEM method should be made at the methodology section, b) also, the theoretical model figure should presented in the beginning of section 3. C) in this section I suggest the authors to present a Table 1 summarizing prior studies regarding online flow studies organized by some criteria such as constructs and casual relations tested, methods, researched public, country, main findings. The final line of the table should be your paper.

4. research methods. A) I suggest to include the questionnaire afirmations in table 1. B) inform whether a pre teste were carried out; c) clarify if the questionnaire was apllied in English or Turkish language;

4) Discussion – the authors affirms twice “study makes a significant contribution to the literature” (lines 442 and 465) but these affirmation lacks of arguments based on prior reviewed literature.

5) Conclusion – The covid19 scenario was brough to the discussion in conclusion. Why was not discussed either in the introduction? I suggest also to enhance the managerial contributions in a separate subsection of the conclusion and also add “research limitation and future studies”.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Anna Dziadkiewicz

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254685.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Jun 2021

Dear Editor,

Thank you for your comments on the manuscript.

The manuscript has been revised in the light of reviewer comments.

1. Conformance to PLOS ONE’s style requirements

The manuscript has been revised to conform to the PLOS ONE’s style requirements. The changes have been highlighted in the manuscript with track changes open in the Word document.

2. Text overlap with 4 sources

The part of the text related with the mentioned 4 sources has been rephrased and the sources has been mentioned in the text.

3. Availability of the Research Dataset

We have uploaded the research dataset for your information.

4. Missing reference to Table 3 within the text

Additional sentence is put to reference Table 3.

Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer #2:

Significance of the study

New text has been added to the Introduction and Conceptual background parts to underline the significance of the study.

Reviewer #3:

1. Typing errors

The whole manuscript has been revised again to correct the typing errors including but not limited to the mentioned ones. The corrections have been highlighted with track changes on in the Word document.

2-3 Sampling and descriptive statistics

The following paragraph has been added to 4.1 Measures and Sampling part which includes answers to the raised questions.

The questionnaire was distributed to more than 700 individuals residing in Turkey via an online from. The survey was conducted in Turkish, among university students residing in 7 biggest cities in all geographical regions in Turkey, namely; İstanbul, İzmir, Antalya, Samsun, Ankara, Erzurum, Diyarbakır. The online questionnaire was accepted only from those adults with their explicit consent and who had previously purchased online in the past 12 months. 538 valid questionnaires from individuals were collected. 334 of the respondents were female and the remaining 204 respondents were male.

4-5-6-7-8 Authors Comments to the criticisms on Validity

The method of the article is very robust and the determination of validity is reported correctly. In a theoretically determined model, construct validity refers to convergence of observed variables that are connected to the same latent variable (convergent validity) and dissociation of observed variables from other observed variables that are connected to other latent variables (discriminant validity). The construct validity indicates that the observed variables do not measure any latent variable other than they connected in the conceptual model. But in this case, it would not be correct to say that the validity of the construct is fully realized without confirming the reliability of the scale (Gerbing & Anderson, 1988).

Convergent validity indicates that the correlations between questions constituting a construct are high. In structural equation modeling method, it is necessary to look at the results of confirmatory factor analysis to determine the convergent validity of the scales used to measure the dimensions constituting the conceptual model of the research. The measurement model part of structural equation models corresponds to confirmatory factor analysis (Confirmatory Factor Analysis - CFA). Therefore, if the measurement model fit indices are low, there is no need to test the structural model (See also Figure 1. Demarcation between Measurement Model and Structural Model). Because the scales used to measure the dimensions that make up the conceptual model will not be validated. Therefore, if the measurement model is insufficient, the fit indices of the structural model will be low. The t test results of all the coefficients in the measurement model should indicate that the coefficient values are different from zero. The standard value of each coefficient in the measurement model is the factor loadings of the confirmatory factor analysis. Each factor load should be higher than 0.50. Otherwise, the fit indices of the general model will be adversely affected. The fact that the factor loads are above 0,5 is evidence of convergent validity. If the critical rate value of a question in CFA results is greater than 2 as an absolute value this means that this item is loaded to the factor it is connected.

Discriminant validity is the measure of the level at which a structure in a measurement model differs from other structures. It is an indicator of a low correlation between the questions that form a construct and other questions that form another construct. To find the discriminant validity for each dimension, we first need to calculate the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) value for each dimension. The acceptable AVE value must be greater than 0.50 or 0.50. However, as noted in the previous section, this value confirms convergent validity when examined alone (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). In order to determine discriminant validity, it is also desirable that the values of the AVE for each construct in the data set are larger than the correlation coefficients of that construct with the other constructs. In this case, it can be determined that the scales used have discriminant validity for each dimension. AVE value alone does not indicate discriminant validity but the square root of the AVE value of each construct is larger than the inter-dimensional correlation value it can be said that there is discriminant validity (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).

9. Bibliography

The extant literature has been revised extensively including but not limited to the recent literature.

10. Reference names

References section has been revised thoroughly to correct any mistakes.

Reviewer #4

Typing errors have been corrected. The corrections are highlighted with track changes open.

The second paragraph in the introduction section has been removed and the third paragraph has been revised.

New sentences were added to discuss the Covid-19 scenario also in the introduction.

Note to the reviewer: No pre-test was carried out in the research.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Dejan Dragan

2 Jul 2021

The Role of Customer Experience in the Effect of Online Flow State on Customer Loyalty

PONE-D-21-08998R1

Dear Authors,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dejan Dragan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All reviews and comments have been appropriately considered. Accordingly, I recommend the acceptance of the paper. AE DD.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Dejan Dragan

6 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-08998R1

The Role of Customer Experience in the Effect of Online Flow State on Customer Loyalty

Dear Dr. Eroğlu Pektaş:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Dejan Dragan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (SAV)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its S1 Data file.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES