Abstract
The complete polarization state of second harmonic (SH) light was measured and characterized by collagen type I and skeletal muscle fiber using a Stokes vector-based SHG microscope. The polarization states of the SH signal are analyzed in a pixel-by-pixel manner and displayed through two dimensional (2D) Stokes vector images. Various polarization parameters are reconstructed using Stokes values to quantify the polarization properties of SH light. Also, the measurements are extended for different input polarization states to investigate the molecular structure of second harmonic generation (SHG) active molecules such as collagen type I and myosin.
Keywords: Second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy, Polarimetry, Ultrafast optics, Collagen type I, Skeletal muscle fiber
Introduction
The second harmonic generation (SHG) is a second-order nonlinear coherent optical process via virtual state transitions, widely used for imaging non-centrosymmetric molecules [1, 2]. The technique has been widely applied for structural imaging from the subcellular to tissue level with high penetration depth employing ultrafast pulsed lasers [3–5]. In general, due to the usage of a near-infrared ultrafast laser, it reduces scattering and absorption in bio-tissues that feature deeper imaging of penetration depth up to mm scale [6–8] and maintains high resolution and contrast as well. Most importantly, the localized excitation through a multiphoton process can greatly suppress the out-of-focus scattering, which facilitates optical sectioning capability to image a thick tissue layer by layer and then reconstructs a three-dimensional (3D) image [9]. Alternatively, SHG is a mature imaging tool for characterizing fiber orientation and morphological structure of collagen with 3D submicron spatial resolution [10, 11], in the human dermis [12, 13], keloid [1], cornea [14, 15], and the tumor microenvironment [16–19]. Furthermore, it can determine the degradation degree of type II collagen in cartilage using polarization-resolved measurements (i.e., P-SHG) [20]. SHG microscopy integrated with two-photon excitation fluorescence (TPEF) has also opened new routes towards label-free optical diagnostics [21], particularly for complex cellular assemblies of skin tissue [19] with submicron spatial resolution. It is found that SHG microscopy combined with TPEF is capable of identifying sarcomeric anomalies of skeletal muscle in physiological/biochemical state with significant sensitivity [22–25]. Additional studies found that a combination of coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) and SHG microscopy affords greater potential for visualizing subcellular organelles, such as mitochondria and cell nuclei, in skeletal muscle including their microstructure [26]. However, it should be noted that SH intensity generated only from non-centrosymmetric molecules and depends on the orientation of SH active molecules (collagen fiber, myosin) as well as the polarization state of excitation light [27–29].
The SHG signal from myosin and collagen is due to the protein crystal structure, mainly amino acids present in them [30]. Again, the signal strength depends on the lattice structure in three dimension (3D) and also orientation, symmetry, as well as folding of protein crystal [31]. It possesses second-order nonlinearity due to the birefringence and superhelical structures of length and width, 300 and 1 nm, respectively [32], and hence is used to discriminate the collagen in biological tissue using SHG microscopy [33, 34]. The SHG signal generation is strongly dependent on the angle between the input state of laser polarization and collagen alignment and thus the collagen orientation can be determined through the degree of polarization (DOP) [35, 36]. The quantifiable differences among sizes, shapes, and lengths of collagen fibers are important and can be automatically segmented using a suitable algorithm to speed up the analysis.
Again, a skeletal muscle fiber is formed by the spatial arrangement of myofibrils which are composed of myosin and actin filaments. These myofilaments form a cross-striated-like structure called sarcomere, which is a repeating unit of Z lines. Sarcomeres are connected serially, of length ranges from 2 to 3 μm, and the myofibrils are arranged depending on the type of muscle [5, 37]. Z line is surrounded by one section of A-band (only myosin coiled tail) and I-band (both myosin tail and head regions). It is known that myosin/actin filaments are helical and possess hexagonal and/or C6 cylindrical symmetry [20, 38, 39]. It was reported that the SHG signal is generated from the myosin head and thick filament of the sarcomere and changes the SHG intensity during contraction [28, 40, 41]. SHG image contrast is proportional to the molecular structure and order of the myosin. Also, Yuan et al. demonstrated that α- and β-myosin possess different symmetries that were observed under polarization-resolved SHG microscopy in a single-sarcomere line scan [42]. Again, the changes in the structure and physiological properties of myofibrils are investigated through the intrinsic SH signal [5, 37].
In general, Jones calculus or Stokes algebra is used for characterizing polarization light; however, only Stokes algebra is suitable for all states of polarization, partially or unpolarized [35, 43], whereas Jones calculus is only applicable for describing perfectly polarized light [44]. Conventional two-channel polarization-resolved SH microscopy is based on Jones calculus and applied to find linear birefringence and anisotropy by rotating the input polarization states and measuring the corresponding SH intensities [45–47]. We implemented Stokes vector-based polarization-resolved SHG microscopy for collagen type I and starch granule through inspection of various polarization properties [35, 36]. In this study, we describe the potential of Stokes vector-based SHG microscope to investigate the polarization properties of SH light from collagen type I and skeletal muscle fiber, where SH signal is generated from the C-N pair of the peptide bond in protein and synthetic oligopeptides [48]. We demonstrate the reconstruction of 2D Stokes vector and various polarization parameter images including the degree of polarization (DOP), linear polarization (DOLP), circular polarization (DOCP), and anisotropy.
Materials and methods
A four-channel Stokes polarimeter was built and integrated with a SHG microscope. The experimental arrangement is described in detail in [35, 36, 49]. The excitation wavelength of 800 nm from a femtosecond Ti: sapphire (Coherent Mira Optima 900-F) laser oscillator was used. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the laser is 15 nm of the pulse duration ~ 100 fs, with a repetition rate of ~ 76 MHz and average power of ~ 550 mW. The excitation beam is passed through the polarization state generator (PSG) which is a combination of half-wave plate and a linear polarizer. The PSG generates 00 and 900 polarization states of laser light. The laser beam is scanned with 50 to 50 μm scanning area to the samples mounted on an XY stage and focused by a × 40 objective lens (UPlanFLN N.A. 1.3, Olympus Co., Japan) [see Fig. 1, Ref. 35] of working distance in 0.51 mm. The average power of 15 mW was used at the focal plane of the objective lens. In the laboratory coordinates XYZ, where laser propagates in the Z-direction and samples are scanned in XY-plane, where X is horizontal and Y is vertical axis. SHG intensity is measured as a function of the relative angles between laser beam polarization and orientation of SHG-active molecule. The polarization state of laser is rotating at an angle with respect to the samples (X-axis). In our experiment, collagen fiber and skeletal muscle are thick and arbitrary oriented and hence we assumed them to be parallel to XY-plane. The forward directed SH signal is collected using a × 20 objective lens (0.75 N.A., Olympus Co., Japan). A 400 ± 40 nm (Edmund Optics Inc., USA) bandpass filter along with a 680-nm short pass (Semrock) filter was also inserted into the SHG emission path for SH signal collection. The SH light is passed through a polarization state analyzer (PSA) to reconstruct the Stokes parameters [36]. The SH signals are guided through liquid light guides (5-mm core diameter, LLG0538-6, Thorlabs Inc.) to four photo-multiplier tubes (PMTs). Four PMTs were integrated with time-correlated single-photon counting electronics (TCSPC, PicoHarp300, PicoQuant GmbH, Germany) for measuring the SH signals simultaneously. The SHG Stokes vector “Sout” is measured from the four intensity images, I, using the equation: Sout = (A4 × 4)−1 ⋅ I. MATLAB (MathWorks, R2009b, Natick, MA) program is used to reconstruct the 2D Stokes vector and various polarization parameters [35]. The SH signals are measured from collagen type I and skeletal muscle fiber (attached at both ends to a coverslip) for 00 and 900 polarization states of laser light. The tail of the adult mouse was removed and immediately incubated in liquid nitrogen. The tail was dissected and individual fibers were extracted by microdissection. The imaging experiment was performed immediately after fiber extraction.
Results and discussion
Stokes parameters of SH signal from collagen type I and skeletal muscle fiber are measured with various input laser polarization states to investigate the alignment and orientation of fibers. Polarization microscopy improves the image contrast of sarcomeres in myofibrils due to the linear birefringence; the origin of SHG contrast arises from a quadratic dependence on the SHG active protein concentration. Previously, it was reported that SH contrast is enhanced with selective arrangements of collagen type I and muscle fibers [36, 50]. Figure 1(a) and Fig. 2(a) shows the 2D Stokes vector SHG images from skeletal muscle fiber and collagen type I with different input laser beam polarizations. Figure 1(b) and Fig. 2(b) show the spatial variation of the DOP, DOLP, DOCP, and anisotropy, r, as was derived from the four Stokes parameters from the samples, shown in Figs. 1(a) and Fig. 2(a).
Figure 1 shows the SHG images of the myosin in muscle fiber. The polarization-dependent SHG images depict the high second-order nonlinearity due to densely packed fibrous protein myosins. We have reconstructed 2D Stokes vector SHG images of skeletal muscle fibers with various input polarization states of light (as shown in Fig. 1). The orientation distribution can be determined by measuring the different Stokes parameters along with the intensity contrast in the image. We can also identify the isotropic (I) and anisotropic (A) bands in sarcomeres, which are displayed as an alternating dark and bright bands in the SHG image which helps in measuring the length of the sarcomere of ~ 3 μm. The myofibrils are well packed and interconnected serially through intermediate filaments called sarcomeres. The dependency of the SH signal on the direction of the polarization state of the incident beam of light was hence examined. In Fig. 1(b), the DOP value is higher for vertically polarized light illumination. The higher values of DOP show that myofibrils are packed parallel to the given direction and those sarcomeres are in phase with each other. On the other hand, the DOP value tends to be lower when the polarization of the laser is horizontally polarized. In Fig. 1(b), changes in the DOLP values are attributed to the signal depolarization, whereas the changes in the DOCP of SH light are due to a combination of depolarization and muscle birefringence. DOLP values are equal to 1 corresponding to perfectly linear polarized light, whereas DOLP equal to 0 corresponds to depolarized light. The DOLP image clearly shows that the DOLP values are higher for 00 polarized excitation than the 900 polarized excitation, which is due to the strong SH signal dependency on the direction of the input polarization. DOCP values also varied significantly for two different excitation polarization since the structural arrangement of sarcomere bands are different. Furthermore, the molecular arrangement of microfibrils in skeletal muscle is measured by anisotropy “r” and ranges from − 0.5 to 1. The anisotropy images show that molecules are better aligned 900 since the “r” value is approximately − 0.5 when 900 polarized incident light. However, in the case of 00 polarized excitation light, the anisotropy value is approximately 0. Thus, it is clearly shown that the SH signal varies significantly with different excitation polarization angles. Figure 2(a) and 2(b) shows the normalized Stokes parameters and reconstructed various polarization parameters of SHG images of collagen type I fiber when the incident beam is 00 and 900 polarized, respectively. The SHG images are acquired at a depth of 20 μm. Stokes parameters are varied with different input polarization states which are due to the arrangement of the optical axis in collagen fibers. The polarization parameters are analyzed in each pixel of the image; the DOP value is approximately 1 indicating the SH signal is fully polarized. The DOLP values show the alignment of fiber and molecules parallel to the vertically/horizontal polarization state of the input laser beam. DOCP determines how the coil-like structure of collagen type I changes the relative polarization between the incident fundamental and SH signal. The anisotropy measurements of the SHG signal exploit the effect of birefringence, which is due to the sample heterogeneity in the Z propagation direction from collagen type I.
Conclusion
We discuss a Stokes polarimeter in combination with SHG microscopy to fully characterize the polarization dependence of SH signal. The polarization states of SH signal are measured, analyzed in each pixel of the 2D images, and displayed through Stokes vectors. Various polarization parameters are reconstructed using Stokes values to quantify the polarization properties of SH light. The Stokes vector-based analysis demonstrated that molecular arrangements in collagen type I and skeletal muscle fiber are different with high spatial resolution. The effect of birefringence and crystal orientation of skeletal muscle fiber and collagen type I are visualized from the polarization parameters. We observed that DOP is approximately unity at 900 polarizations in both the samples, which indicates that SH active molecules are parallel to the 900 laser polarization. The technique has the potential in the field of biomedical applications where the structure or orientation of molecules is a key factor including the progress of wound healing and tissue morphology.
The developed four-channel-based Stokes vector-based SHG microscopy measures the full Stokes parameters of the SHG light in transmission geometry from thin samples such as starch, collagen, and skeletal muscle fiber. In case of thick tissue samples, the penetration depth of laser is limited and SHG light intensity is weak and therefore cannot be collected in the forward direction. In the case of in vivo imaging, SHG light is generated from the surface of the image plane and detected in epi-detection. The Stokes vector-based measurement can be implemented in an epi-detection mode for in vivo imaging with a slight modification of optical design. The Stokes polarimeter should be placed in epi-detection for SHG signal collection although fiber optics-based endoscopy integrated with SHG microscopy is demonstrated for clinical applications [51, 52].
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. K. Satyamoorthy, Director, Manipal School of Life Sciences (MSLS), Manipal, for his encouragement. Authors thank Dr. K. K. Mahato, Head of Department of Biophysics, MSLS, for his constant support, and Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, India, for providing the infrastructure needed during preparation of the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal. We received financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India (Project Number-DST/INT/BLG/P-3/2019). The authors would also like to thank the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC99-2627-M-010-002, NSC98-2627-M-010-006, NSC97-2112-M-010-002-MY3, and NSC98-2112-M-010-001-MY3).
Compliance with ethical standards
The rats were supplied by the National Yang-Ming University Animal Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Da Costa V, Wei R, Lim R, Sun CH, Brown JJ, Wong BJ. Nondestructive imaging of live human keloid and facial tissue using multiphoton microscopy. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10:38–43. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2007.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Campagnola PJ, Loew LM. Second harmonic imaging microscopy for visualizing biomolecular arrays in cells, tissues and organisms. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1356–1360. doi: 10.1038/nbt894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Campagnola PJ. Second harmonic generation imaging microscopy: applications to diseases diagnostics. Anal Chem. 2011;83:3224–3231. doi: 10.1021/ac1032325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen X, Nadiarynkh O, Plotnikov S, Campagnola PJ. Second harmonic generation microscopy for quantitative analysis of collagen fibrillar structure. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:654–669. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Psilodimitrakopoulos S, Santos SICO, Amat-Roldan I, Thayil AKN, Artigas D, Loza-Alvarez P. In vivo, pixel-resolution mapping of thick filaments orientation in nonfibrillar muscle using polarization-sensitive second harmonic generation microscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14:014001. doi: 10.1117/1.3059627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ouzounov DG, Wang T, Wang M, Feng DD, Horton NG, Cruz-Hernández JC, et al. In vivo three-photon imaging of activity of GCaMP6-labeled neurons deep in intact mouse brain. Nat Methods. 2017;14:388–390. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Min W, Freudiger CW, Lu S, Xie XS. Coherent nonlinear optical imaging: beyond fluorescence microscopy. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2011;62:507–530. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Masters BR, So P (2008) Handbook of biomedical nonlinear optical microscopy. Oxford University Press
- 9.Mainil-Varlet P, Aigner T, Brittberg M, Bullough P, Hollander A, Hunziker E, et al. Histological assessment of cartilage repair: a report by the Histology Endpoint Committee of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85:45–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mansfield JC, Mandalia V, Toms A, Winlove CP, Brasselet S. Collagen reorganization in cartilage under strain probed by polarization sensitive second harmonic generation microscopy. J R Soc Interface. 2019;16:20180611. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Strupler M, Pena AM, Hernest M, Tharaux PL, Martin JL, Beaurepaire E, Schanne-Klein MC. Second harmonic imaging and scoring of collagen in fibrotic tissues. Opt Express. 2007;15:4054–4065. doi: 10.1364/oe.15.004054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sun Y, Chen WL, Lin SJ, Jee SH, Chen YF, Lin LC, et al. Investigating mechanisms of collagen thermal denaturation by high resolution second-harmonic generation imaging. Biophys J. 2006;91:2620–2625. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.085902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Su PJ, Chen WL, Hong JB, Li TH, Wu RJ, Chou CK, et al. Discrimination of collagen in normal and pathological skin dermis through second-order susceptibility microscopy. Opt Express. 2009;17:11161–11171. doi: 10.1364/oe.17.011161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Han M, Giese G, Bille JF. Second harmonic generation imaging of collagen fibrils in cornea and sclera. Opt Express. 2005;13:5791–5797. doi: 10.1364/opex.13.005791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matteini P, Ratto F, Rossi F, Cicchi R, Stringari C, Kapsokalyvas D, et al. Photothermally-induced disordered patterns of corneal collagen revealed by SHG imaging. Opt Express. 2009;17:4868–4878. doi: 10.1364/oe.17.004868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lin SJ, Jee SH, Kuo CJ, Wu RJ, Lin WC, Chen JS, et al. Discrimination of basal cell carcinoma from normal dermal stroma by quantitative multiphoton imaging. Opt Lett. 2006;31:2756–2758. doi: 10.1364/ol.31.002756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brown E, McKee T, Pluen A, Seed B, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation. Nat Med. 2003;9:796–800. doi: 10.1038/nm879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Provenzano PP, Eliceiri KW, Campbell JM, Inman DR, White JG, Keely PJ. Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion. BMC Med. 2006;4:1–5. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cicchi R, Sestini S, De Giorgi V, Massi D, Lotti T, Pavone FS. Nonlinear laser imaging of skin lesions. J Biophotonics. 2008;1:62–73. doi: 10.1002/jbio.200710003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Psilodimitrakopoulos S, Amat-Roldan I, Loza-Alvarez P, Artigas D. Effect of molecular organization on the image histograms of polarization SHG microscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 2012;3:2681–2693. doi: 10.1364/BOE.3.002681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dombeck DA, Kasischke KA, Vishwasrao HD, Ingelsson M, Hyman BT, Webb WW. Uniform polarity microtubule assemblies imaged in native brain tissue by second harmonic generation microscopy. Proc Nat Acad Sc. 2003;100:7081–7086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0731953100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nucciottia V, Stringarib C, Sacconib L, Vanzib F, Fusia L, Linaria M, et al. Probing myosin structural conformation in vivo by second-harmonic generation microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sc. 2010;107:7763–7768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914782107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Burghardt TP, Ajtai K, Chan DK, Halstead MF, Li J, Zheng Y. GFP-tagged regulatory light chain monitors single myosin lever-arm orientation in a muscle fiber. Biophys J. 2007;93:2226–2239. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.107433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Quinlan ME, Forkey JN, Goldman YE. Orientation of the myosin light chain region by single molecule total internal reflection fluorescence polarization microscopy. Biophys J. 2005;89:1132–1142. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.053496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ralston E, Swaim B, Czapiga M, Hwu WL, Chien YH, Pittis MG, et al. Detection and imaging of non-contractile inclusions and sarcomeric anomalies in skeletal muscle by second harmonic generation combined with two-photon excited fluorescence. J Struct Biol. 2008;162:500–508. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pfeffer CP, Olsen BR, Ganikhanov F, Légaré F. Imaging skeletal muscle using second harmonic generation and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 2011;2:1366–1376. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.001366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Williams RM, Zipfel WR, Webb WW. Interpreting second-harmonic generation images of collagen I fibrils. Biophys J. 2005;88:1377–1386. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.047308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Plotnikov SV, Millard AC, Campagnola PJ, Mohler WA. Characterization of the myosin-based source for second-harmonic generation from muscle sarcomeres. Biophys J. 2006;90:693–703. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.071555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Roth S, Freund I. Second harmonic generation in collagen. J Chem Phys. 1979;70:1637–1643. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Conboy JC, Kriech MA. Measuring melittin binding to planar supported lipid bilayer by chiral second harmonic generation. Anal Chim Acta. 2003;496:143–153. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Haupert LM, DeWalt EL, Simpson GJ. Modeling the SHG activities of diverse protein crystals. Acta Crystallogr D. 2012;68:1513–1521. doi: 10.1107/S0907444912037638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stoller PC, Kim BM, Rubenchik AM, Reiser KM, Da Silva LB. Polarization-dependent optical second-harmonic imaging of rat-tail tendon. J Biomed Opt. 2002;7:205–215. doi: 10.1117/1.1431967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zheng ML, Fujita K, Chen WQ, Duan XM, Kawata S. Two-photon excited fluorescence and second-harmonic generation of the DAST organic nanocrystals. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:8988–8993. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chu SW, Chen SY, Chern GW, Tsai TH, Chen YC, Lin BL, Sun CK. Studies of χ (2)/χ (3) tensors in submicron-scaled bio-tissues by polarization harmonics optical microscopy. Biophys J. 2004;86(6):3914–3922. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.034595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mazumder N, Qiu J, Foreman MR, Romero CM, Hu CW, Tsai HR, et al. Polarization-resolved second harmonic generation microscopy with a four-channel Stokes-polarimeter. Opt Express. 2012;20:14090–14099. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.014090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mazumder N, Hu CW, Qiu J, Foreman MR, Romero CM, Török P, Kao FJ. Revealing molecular structure and orientation with Stokes vector resolved second harmonic generation microscopy. Methods. 2014;66:237–245. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Both M, Vogel M, Friedrich O, von Wegner F, Künsting T, Fink RH, et al. Second harmonic imaging of intrinsic signals in muscle fibers in situ. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:882–892. doi: 10.1117/1.1783354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Odin C, Guilbert T, Alkilani A, Boryskina OP, Fleury V, Le Grand Y. Collagen and myosin characterization by orientation field second harmonic microscopy. Opt Express. 2008;16:16151–16165. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.016151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.François T, Recher G, Rouède D. Estimation of helical angles of myosin and collagen by second harmonic generation imaging microscopy. Opt Express. 2007;15:12286–12295. doi: 10.1364/oe.15.012286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Boulesteix T, Beaurepaire E, Sauviat MP, Schanne-Klein MC. Second-harmonic microscopy of unstained living cardiac myocytes: measurements of sarcomere length with 20-nm accuracy. Opt Lett. 2004;29:2031–2033. doi: 10.1364/ol.29.002031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Greenhalgh C, Prent N, Green C, Cisek R, Major A, Stewart B, Barzda V. Influence of semicrystalline order on the second-harmonic generation efficiency in the anisotropic bands of myocytes. Appl Opt. 2007;46:1852–1859. doi: 10.1364/ao.46.001852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cai Y, Zhao X, Wang Z, Borg KT, Ye T, et al. Study of the expression transition of cardiac myosin using polarization-dependent SHG microscopy. Biophys J. 2020;118:1058–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ghosh N, Wood MFG, Vitkin IA. Influence of the order of the constituent basis matrices on the Mueller matrix decomposition-derived polarization parameters in complex turbid media such as biological tissue. Opt Commun. 2010;283:1200–1208. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Walker MJ. Matrix calculus and the Stokes parameters of polarized radiation. Am J Phys. 1954;22:170–174. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ait-Belkacem D, Gasecka A, Munhoz F, Brustlein S, Brasselet S. Influence of birefringence on polarization resolved nonlinear microscopy and collagen SHG structural imaging. Opt Express. 2010;18:14859–14870. doi: 10.1364/OE.18.014859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fu L, Gu M. Polarization anisotropy in fiber-optic second harmonic generation microscopy. Opt Express. 2008;16:5000–5006. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.005000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sun CW, Yang CC, Kiang YW. Optical imaging based on time-resolved Stokes vectors in filamentous tissues. Appl Opt. 2003;42:750–754. doi: 10.1364/ao.42.000750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mitchell SA, McAloney RA, Moffatt D, Mora-Diez N, Zgierski MZ. Second harmonic generation optical activity of a polypeptide alpha-helix at the air/water interface. J Chem Phys. 2005;122:114707. doi: 10.1063/1.1862613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Foreman MR, Romero CM, Tӧrӧk P. A priori information and optimization in polarimetry. Opt Express. 2008;16:15212–15227. doi: 10.1364/oe.16.015212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mazumder N, Qiu J, Hu CW, Kao FJ. Imaging molecular structure with Stokes-polarimeter based second harmonic generation microscopy. Proc of SPIE. 2013;8588:858823. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Akhoundi F, Qin Y, Peyghambarian N, Barton JK, Kieu K. Compact fiber-based multi-photon endoscope working at 1700 nm. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9:2326–2335. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.002326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bao H, Boussioutas A, Jeremy R, Russell S, Gu M. Second harmonic generation imaging via nonlinear endomicroscopy. Opt Express. 2010;18:1255–1260. doi: 10.1364/OE.18.001255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]