ABSTRACT
The vaginal environment with candidiasis has a pH of 3.8 to 4.5 and this has a negative effect on the activity of antifungals. Ibrexafungerp was evaluated against 187 Candida isolates, including fluconazole-sensitive and -resistant Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida tropicalis with the media adjusted to pH 7.0 and pH 4.5. Ibrexafungerp MIC values were not adversely affected when tested at pH 4.5. Ibrexafungerp exhibited significant activity against all isolates at pH 4.5.
KEYWORDS: candidiasis, ibrexafungerp, pH, vulvovaginal
INTRODUCTION
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common fungal infection that affects up to 8 in 10 women in their lifetime, with 40% to 45% experiencing two or more episodes (1, 2). An analysis of direct health care costs of noninvasive candidiasis in the United States reported that 1.4 million outpatient visits occur annually due to VVC at an estimated cost of $368 million (3, 4). Between 85% and 95% of cultured yeast species causing VVC are Candida albicans, but recent reports suggest an increased prevalence of non-albicans Candida (NAC) in about 10% to 30% of patients with VVC (5, 6), with the prevalence of Candida glabrata increasing (7). NAC species are frequently, but not always, resistant to azole agents (7, 8). Vaginal NAC species include C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. lusitaniae, C. famata, C. tropicalis, and C. dubliniensis (7). The increased recent incidence of non-albicans Candida is thought to be due to overuse of azole antifungal vaginal products, single-dose treatments, and low-dosage azole maintenance regimens (5, 7, 9). Recent studies further report a rapidly growing incidence of resistance of C. albicans to the azole drug class (10).
Multiple previous in vitro studies have shown significantly reduced activity of fluconazole in low-pH testing environments, which is of concern given the vaginal pH found in women with VVC is invariably <4.5 (11–13). Antifungal agents selected for treating VVC should provide activity against all Candida spp. at a vaginal pH of 4 to 4.5 (14).
Ibrexafungerp is an oral antifungal agent belonging to a novel class of glucan synthase inhibitors, triterpenoids, that have broad in vitro activity against Candida, including azole-resistant Candida species (15, 16). Ibrexafungerp is fungicidal against Candida spp. (17) and has demonstrated high penetration in vaginal tissue is preclinical models (18). Ibrexafungerp is being developed for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis, as well as systemic fungal infections due to resistant isolates. This study evaluated the effect of low-pH environments on the in vitro activity of ibrexafungerp against clinical vulvovaginal isolates, including isolates resistant to fluconazole.
Ibrexafungerp was evaluated in vitro against 187 vaginal Candida isolates obtained from women with VVC who were treated at the Wayne State University Vaginitis Clinic. This included 52 fluconazole-resistant C. albicans (FLU MIC >2 μg/ml), 30 fluconazole-sensitive C. albicans (FLU MIC ≤2 μg/ml), 30 randomly selected C. glabrata isolates, and 25 each randomly selected isolates of C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis. All isolates tested were original clinical vaginal isolates obtained at the Wayne State University Vaginitis Clinic. Identification was achieved by germ tube formation testing, CHROMagar plating, and standard fermentation profile analysis. Isolates were stored in −70°C freezers.
Vaginal isolates were plated on CHROMagar to verify purity of culture. These plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C in ambient air. Susceptibility testing was performed with ibrexafungerp concentrations of 0.03 to 2 μg/ml using a broth microdilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M27-A4 (19) guidelines utilizing pH 7. A 0.1-ml yeast inoculum of 1.5 (±1.0) × 103 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium was added to each microdilution well. The trays were then incubated at 35°C for 48 h in ambient air. The MICs were read visually as the lowest antifungal concentration with substantially lower turbidity (80% growth reduction) compared to growth in the antifungal-free growth well for all agents. Testing known ATCC strains of Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258 ensured quality control. Susceptibility tests were performed simultaneously, with the media adjusted to pH 7.0 with NaOH and pH 4.5 with HCl. Ibrexafungerp MIC readings were conducted at 24 h.
Ibrexafungerp demonstrated in vitro activity against all the clinical isolates tested at normal pH 7.0 (Table 1). No differences were observed in ibrexafungerp MIC90 values (24 h endpoint at pH 7) between the fluconazole-resistant and fluconazole-sensitive C. albicans isolates (MIC90 = 0.03 μg/ml). Against C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis isolates, ibrexafungerp MIC90 values were 0.25, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively.
TABLE 1.
Parameter | Fluconazole-resistant C. albicans (n = 52) | Fluconazole-sensitive C. albicans (n = 30) | C. glabrata (n = 25) | C. krusei (n = 25) | C. parapsilosis (n = 25) | C. tropicalis (n = 25) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC50 ibrexafungerp | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.125 |
MIC90 ibrexafungerp | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.25 |
Median | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Range | 0.03–0.06 | 0.03–0.06 | 0.06–0.25 | 0.25–1 | 0.125–4 | 0.03–0.25 |
Ibrexafungerp MIC values were not adversely affected when tested at the lower pH 4.5 (Table 2). No differences were observed in ibrexafungerp’s MIC90 values (24 h endpoint at pH 4.5) between the fluconazole-resistant and fluconazole-sensitive C. albicans isolates (MIC90 = 0.06 μg/ml). Against C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis isolates, ibrexafungerp MIC90 values were 0.5, 0.25, 0.25, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively.
TABLE 2.
Parameter | Fluconazole-resistant C. albicans (n = 52) | Fluconazole-sensitive C. albicans (n = 30) | C. glabrata (n = 25) | C. krusei (n = 25) | C. parapsilosis (n = 25) | C. tropicalis (n = 25) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC50 ibrexafungerp | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
MIC90 ibrexafungerp | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Median | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.25 |
Range | 0.03–0.06 | 0.03–0.06 | 0.125–0.5 | 0.06–0.5 | 0.03–0.5 | 0.03–0.5 |
It is not the standard of clinical care to perform susceptibility tests on all culture-verified clinical isolates of the various Candida spp. obtained from symptomatic women with acute VVC. In vitro susceptibility tests should be obtained in the presence of refractory or highly frequent recurrent VVC, especially when caused by non-albicans Candida spp. Similarly, it is not the practice for commercial or other laboratories to perform testing at any other pH but 7.0, given that the pH of blood is around 7.0, unlike the vagina that normally has an acidic pH of 3.8 to 4.5. Multiple studies have shown that testing at pH 7.0 dramatically underestimates the frequency and reliability of detecting azole-resistant Candida isolates that may be resistant to azole therapy and affect azole treatment outcomes, especially C. glabrata, which is particularly prone to the effects of the acidic pH environment of the vagina in women with VVC (11–13, 20–22). Ibrexafungerp exhibited significant in vitro activity against all fluconazole-resistant and fluconazole-sensitive vaginal Candida species isolates at pH 7.0. The potent in vitro activity of ibrexafungerp was retained at a pH of 4.5, relevant for the vaginal milieu, directed at all Candida spp. tested. In contrast to other antifungal classes, the in vitro susceptibility of ibrexafungerp appears to be unaffected by the pH of the testing medium studied, which provides increased confidence in the potential clinical efficacy of ibrexafungerp for treating VVC.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the editorial assistance of Richard S. Perry in the preparation of the manuscript, which was supported by SCYNEXIS, Inc., Jersey City, NJ.
All authors performed data analysis and interpretation, as well as manuscript review and approval.
J. D. Sobel serves as a consultant to SCYNEXIS, Inc. All other authors are paid employees of SCYNEXIS, Inc., Jersey City, NJ.
This study was supported by SCYNEXIS, Inc., Jersey City, NJ.
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Fungal diseases: vaginal candidiasis. https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/candidiasis/genital/index.html. Accessed 19 June 2020.
- 2.Rosati D, Bruno M, Jaeger M, Ten Oever J, Netea MG. 2020. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: an immunological perspective. Microorganisms 8:144. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Benedict K, Jackson BR, Chiller T, Beer KD. 2019. Estimation of direct healthcare costs of fungal diseases in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 68:1791–1797. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goncalves B, Ferreira C, Alves CT, Henriques M, Azeredo J, Silva S. 2016. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. Crit Rev Microbiol 42:905–927. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2015.1091805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hubertine Willems ME, Salman SA, Liu J, Zhenbo X, Peters BM. 2020. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: a current understanding and burning questions. J Fungi (Basel) 6:27. doi: 10.3390/jof6010027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marchaim D, Lemanek L, Bheemreddy S, Kaye KS, Sobel JD. 2012. Fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans vulvovaginitis. Obstet Gynecol 120:1407–1414. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827307b2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mintz JD, Martens MG. 2013. Prevalence of non-albicans Candida infections in women with recurrent vulvovaginal symptomatology. Advan Infec Dis 3:238–242. doi: 10.4236/aid.2013.34035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Makanjuola O, Bongomin F, Fayemiwo S. 2018. An update on the roles on non-albicans Candida species in vulvovaginitis. J Fungi 4:121. doi: 10.3390/jof4040121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sobel J. 2005. Current treatment options for vulvovaginal candidiasis. Womens Health (Lond) 1:253–261. doi: 10.2217/17455057.1.2.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhattacharya S, Sae-Tia S, Fries BC. 2020. Candidiasis and mechanisms of antifungal resistance. Antibiotics 9:312–319. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9060312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boikov DA, Locke JB, James KD, Bartizal K, Sobel JD. 2017. In vitro activity of the novel echinocandin CD101 at pH 7 and 4 against Candida spp. isolates from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:1355–1358. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Danby CS, Boikov D, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Sobel JD. 2012. Effect of pH on in vitro susceptibility of Candida glabrata and Candida albicans to 11 antifungal agents and implications for clinical use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1403–1406. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05025-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Spitzer M, Wiederhold NP. 2018. Reduced antifungal susceptibility of vulvovaginal Candida species at normal vaginal pH levels: clinical implications. J Low Genit Tract Dis 22:152–158. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Linhares IM, Summers PR, Larsen B, Giraldo PC, Witkin SS. 2011. Contemporary perspectives on vaginal pH and lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Davis MR, Donnelley MA, Thompson GR. 2020. Ibrexafungerp: a novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor. Med Mycol 58:579–592. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myz083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gamal A, Chu S, McCormick TS, Borroto-Esoda K, Angulo D, Ghannoum MA. 2021. Ibrexafungerp, a novel oral triterpenoid antifungal in development: overview of antifungal activity against Candida glabrata. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:642358. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.642358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Scorneaux B, Angulo D, Borroto-Esoda K, Ghannoum M, Peel M, Wring S. 2017. SCY-078 is fungicidal against Candida species in time-kill studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01961-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01961-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wring S, Borroto-Esoda K, Solon E, Angulo D. 2018. SCY-078, a novel fungicidal agent, demonstrates distribution to tissues associated with fungal infections during mass balance studies with intravenous and oral [14C]SCY-078 in albino and pigmented rats. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e02119-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02119-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard, third edition. CLSI document M27–A4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu W, Zhang X, Liu Z, Luo X. 2011. Impact of pH on the antifungal susceptibility of vaginal Candida albicans. Int J Gynecol Obstet 114:278–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Locke JB, Almaguer AL, Donatelli JL, Bartizal KF. 2018. Time-kill kinetics of rezafungin (CD101) in vagina-simulative medium for fluconazole-susceptible and fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2018:7040498. doi: 10.1155/2018/7040498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pai MP, Jones AL. 2004. Altered susceptibility of Candida glabrata bloodstream isolates to triazoles at clinically relevant pH values: comparison of the NCCLS M27-A2, Sensititre YeastOne, and Etest methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4441–4443. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4441-4443.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]