Skip to main content
Future Healthcare Journal logoLink to Future Healthcare Journal
letter
. 2021 Jul;8(2):e331–e332. doi: 10.7861/fhj.Let.8.2.3

The digital footprint of Philippine eye care centres in the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic

David FF Chan 1, Peter PT Ronque 2
PMCID: PMC8285159  PMID: 34286212

Editor – As reported in recent articles, the pandemic has accelerated digital healthcare's rise. Following are initial teleophthalmology observations from the Philippines, a lower-middle-income archipelago whose population spends the most time online and on social media, worldwide.1–3 Health gatekeeper mechanisms are absent, out-of-pocket financing is >50%, and population indigency is ∼30%.3 While teleophthalmology examinations and portable technology have limitations, benefits include advocacy, triage/appointment-setting and care resulting in reduction of in-person visits.4–6

During March–June 2020, we explored website and social media presence/footprints of eyecare centres: 135 private ambulatory surgicentres (ASCs) and 27 tertiary centres with training programmes (TCs). Findings include:

  • majority having websites (88% ASCs; 54% TCs) and being present on Facebook (83%–100%)

  • a low presence on other top social media platforms; lowest in Instagram (25% TCs)

  • COVID-related material (81% TCs) and telemedicine services (20% ASCs; 50% TCs) are posted mostly on Facebook

  • eye/ophthalmic health content present in up to 37% of sites.

We excluded existing telemedicine platforms (eg National Telehealth Center serving distant municipal/rural health facilities and private establishments / health insurance companies serving ∼2.3% of the population) and personal professional websites/social media pages.

The telemedicine landscape is largely unexplored, and we found that ophthalmic care providers are populating the space. Further, online platforms were used for pandemic-era issues: tributes to healthcare workers that have died, advocacy for preventive eye care given overwhelmed healthcare systems etc. For individual providers, a recent survey noted similar trends/perspectives seen elsewhere including increasing/majority openness to teleophthalmology, use of modalities other than telephone, increasing use for new patients and decreased confidence in applicability to certain diseases and clinical circumstances.7

As elsewhere, we lack insight into population perspectives and outcomes. Impact of provider choice, patient journey, accessibility and improved ophthalmic outcomes are unknown. Negative impacts of content (occasional sparse and dated information), risk for harm/falsehood cannot be excluded.

Telemedicine's potential strengths include convenience and safety. Though currently with inadequacies, its relevance likely will grow in a disrupted, innovating post-COVID world. It bears potential to leapfrog challenges, particularly in the developing world and gatekeeper-free systems. It is an area of future healthcare that must be examined continually.

Table 1.

Website and social media footprint of Filipino ambulatory surgicentres and tertiary training centres for ophthalmology, March–June 2020

Website Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
Ambulatory surgical centres, n=135, n (%) 74 (54.81) 113 (83.70) 38 (28.15) 46 (34.07) 38 (29.15)
Tertiary centres with accredited residency training programmes, n=27, n (%) 24 (88.89) 27 (100.00) 8 (29.63) 7 (25.93) 11 (40.74)

Acknowledgements

Research described was part of the second year of the Master of Surgery degree in clinical ophthalmology, Edinburgh Surgery Online (ESO), University of Edinburgh, under a David EI Pyott grant. Logistics support was provided by the Veterans Memorial Medical Center. Technical/methodological insights were provided by Dr Beverly LC Ho of the Department of Health-Philippines, Valerie Gilbert T Ulep, Dr Norman Aquino, Dr Jason T Ligot, Dr Sherman O Valero, Dr Juan Maria Pablo Nañagas, Dr Harvey S Uy, Dr Button Ricarte and Dr Caroline Mae Ramirez. Material and various intangible supports were provided by Dr Ildefonso M Chan, Jose Ricardo Fullon Chan, Ildefonso Honorato Fullon Chan, Elizabeth C Fullon and Dr Valorie C Fullon-Chan.

References

  • 1.Kemp S. Digital 2020: The Philippines. Kepios, 2020. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-philippines [Accessed 16 July 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Catedral LIG, Leones LMB, Berba CMG. What Filipinos, the world's number one Internet users, want to know about cancer: A Google search analysis from 2015 to 2019. Journal of Global Oncology 2019;5 suppl:23. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dayrit MM, Lagrada LP, Picazo OF, Pons MC, Villaverde MC. The Philippines health system review. World Health Organization, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Portney DS, Zhu Z, Chen EM, et al. COVID-19 and use of teleophthalmology (cut group): trends and diagnoses. Ophthalmology 2021. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsui E, Rao R. Navigating Social Media in #Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2019;126:779–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yoon S, Kim HYS, Kim J, et al. A current status of teleophthalmology in low- and middle-income countries: literature review. J Glob Health Sci 2019;1:e41. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Azarcon CP, Ranche FKT, Santiago DE. Tele-ophthalmology practices and attitudes in the philippines in light of the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey. Clin Ophthalmol 2021;15:1239–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Future Healthcare Journal are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Physicians

RESOURCES