Skip to main content
Journal of Neurophysiology logoLink to Journal of Neurophysiology
. 2021 May 5;125(6):2264–2278. doi: 10.1152/jn.00119.2021

Gene transcription changes in a locust model of noise-induced deafness

Andrew S French 1,✉, Ben Warren 2
PMCID: PMC8285658  PMID: 33949886

graphic file with name jn-00119-2021r01.jpg

Keywords: auditory neurons, hearing, mechanotransduction, noise-induced hearing loss

Abstract

Locusts have auditory structures called Müller’s organs attached to tympanic membranes on either side of the abdomen. We measured the normalized abundances of 500 different mRNA transcripts in 320 Müller’s organs obtained from 160 locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) that had been subjected to a loud continuous 3-kHz tone for 24 h. Abundance ratios were then measured relative to transcripts from 360 control organs. A histogram of the number of observed transcripts versus their abundance ratios (noise exposed/control) was well fitted by a Cauchy distribution with median value near one. Transcripts below 5% and above 95% of the cumulative distribution function of the fitted Cauchy distribution were selected as putatively different from the expected values of an untreated preparation. This yielded eight transcripts with ratios increased by noise exposure (ratios 1.689–3.038) and 18 transcripts with reduced ratios (0.069–0.457). Most of the transcripts with increased abundance represented genes responsible for cuticular construction, suggesting extensive remodeling of some or all the cuticular components of the auditory structure, whereas the reduced abundance transcripts were mostly involved in lipid and protein storage and metabolism, suggesting a profound reduction in metabolic activity in response to the overstimulation.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY Locust ears have functional and genetic similarities to human ears, including loss of hearing from age or noise exposure. We measured transcript abundances in transcriptomes of noise-exposed and control locust ears. The data indicate remodeling of the ear tympanum and profound reductions in metabolism that may explain reduced sound transduction. These findings advance our understanding of this useful model and suggest further experiments to elucidate mechanisms that ears use to cope with excessive stimulation.

INTRODUCTION

About 1.5 billion people globally have compromised hearing (World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/) due to a range of causes, including genetic defects, infectious diseases, loud noise exposure, and aging. Experimental noise exposure has provided important models of deafness in mammals (1), and this has recently been extended to insect auditory systems (2, 3). Despite obvious differences, insects have evolved organs of hearing that deal with the same problems in converting the small pressure differences of sound into receptor currents in sensory neurons (4). Important similarities with vertebrates are the use of ciliated sensory neurons that use mechanical feedback to amplify small displacements (5, 6) and the presence of many homologous genes in the development and physiology of the hearing structures (7). Insects can provide experimental advantages because of their relatively simple anatomy, ease of breeding, rapid development, and reduced costs. Insects have also provided useful models of aging, including loss of hearing with age (7, 8), with the additional advantage of a short lifespan.

Audition, like all mechanoreception, can be considered as a three-stage process (9). First, the external stimulus (sound) is mechanically coupled to a sensory structure; second, the mechanical signal is transduced to cause an electrical receptor current; third the receptor current is encoded in action potentials for distance transmission. Deafness could involve malfunction at any of the three stages. Changes in mechanical properties and reductions in transduced receptor potentials have been seen in aged (7) and noise-exposed (2, 3) insects, but the causes of these changes remain enigmatic.

A range of ion channel families have been implicated in sensory mechanotransduction, including audition. These comprise Piezo proteins (10), transient receptor potential (TRP) channels (11, 12), degenerin/epithelial sodium channel/acid sensing ion channel (DEG/EnaC/ASIC) families (13), and transmembrane channel-like (TMC) proteins (14). Insect audition is performed by chordotonal organs (15), and three types of TRP channel genes have been linked to chordotonal mechanically activated ion currents: NompC (16), Nanchung, and Inactive (17, 18). However, all the above families must be considered when searching for changes in auditory function.

Many arthropod mechanoreceptors, including chordotonal sensilla, rely on transepithelial gradients of ionic concentrations and voltages to drive the receptor current through mechanically activated ion channels (19). The detailed arrangement of ionic pumps, exchangers, and channels that produce these gradients are not completely understood in any insect tissue (20), but changes in these components could clearly reduce the receptor current and sound detection.

Desert locusts, Schistocerca gregaria, have paired abdominal auditory organs, each consisting of an external tympanum with a sensory structure called Müller’s organ attached internally (21–23). We found previously that 24-h noise exposure produced hearing loss characterized by both mechanical and electrophysiological changes in the locust system (3). Here, we compared the abundances of 500 different mRNA transcripts from Müller’s organs in noise-exposed versus control locusts, in attempts to identify the major molecular changes underway in this model of noise-induced hearing loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals, Noise Exposure, and Tissue Extraction

Details of the animal handling, noise exposure, and transcriptome creation have been given before (3). Briefly, locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) were reared in the gregarious phase with a 12-h light/dark cycle at 36.25°C, fed on a combination of fresh wheat and bran ad libitum. Male locusts between 10 and 20 d postimaginal molt were used for experiments. Wings were cut off at their base to increase noise exposure to the tympanal ears. Up to 20 locusts at a time were placed in a cylindrical wire mesh cage (8 cm diameter, 11 cm height) directly below a loudspeaker (Visaton FR 10 HM 4 OHM, RS Components) driven by a function generator (Thurlby Thandar Instruments TG550, RS Components) and an audio amplifier (Monacor PA-702, Insight Direct) to produce a 3-kHz tone at 126 dB sound pressure level (SPL), measured at the top of the cage, for 24 h continuously. Control locusts were selected, housed, and treated identically for 24 h, but without activating the 3-kHz tone.

A total of 320 Müller’s organs from 160 noise-exposed locusts (2 ears per locust) were extracted by grasping the Müller’s organ (Fig. 1) through the tympanum with fine forceps and pulling it out. Another 320 Müller’s organs were extracted similarly from control animals. RNA extraction took place less than 4 h from the end of the 24-h noise exposure. Müller’s organs were snap frozen onto a pestle within an Eppendorf tube submerged in liquid nitrogen and RNA extracted and treated with DNase using an RNAqueous kit (AM1931, ThermoFisher). RNA was shipped in dry ice for Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing by Beijing Genomics Institute (Hong Kong). Sample RNA integrity values of 8.7 and 8.4 were given by control and noise-exposed samples, respectively. Both noise-exposed and control groups gave ∼186.1 million paired end reads of 100 nucleotides each.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Stimulation of locust ears. Noise-exposed locusts (160 animals) were placed in a cylindrical wire mesh cage directly below a loudspeaker producing a 3-kHz tone at 126 dB sound pressure level (SPL) for 24 h continuously. Other conditions were normal (12-h light/dark cycle, 36.25°C). Controls (160 animals) were treated identically, except that the loudspeaker was silent. Locusts’ ears (black circle) comprise tympani on either the side of the abdomen, each innervated internally by a Müller’s organ, being a nerve ganglion containing at least four identifiable groups of scolopidial sensory neurons that proceed distally through the styliform, folded and pyriform structures to form close apposition with the tympanum (22, 23). At least two muscles are connected to the edge of the tympanum, close to an adjacent spiracle (not shown).

Transcript Discovery

Initial cDNA reads were groomed to select those with 80 or more contiguous nucleotides with Phred quality score of >19 to give a final database of ∼100 million pairs of reads each from control and noise-exposed groups. Two approaches were used to select transcripts for assembly. The first method was a targeted search for genes likely to be affected by noise exposure from known physiology. These included mechanically activated ion channels, membrane transporters for ions hypothetically involved in sensory transduction, cytoskeletal proteins, and molecules associated with synaptic transmission. Sequences of interest were identified by searching all possible translations of reads from the control transcriptome versus amino acid sequences of published genes using BLOSUM matching matrices (24). Closely related species were used when possible, but Drosophila melanogaster sequences were also used in some cases. The searches were conducted at relatively low stringency so that many unrelated genes were also found, assembled, and included in the list. Transcripts from this targeted approach included the genes that we described previously (3).

The second method attempted to find individual reads with strongly different abundances in the two transcriptomes. The first 10 million pairs of each transcriptome were searched by counting the number of times that each read was repeated identically. This process was accelerated by removing all copies of each read from the abbreviated transcriptome as it was counted. This continued until all different reads were found in each set. This initial count took ∼3 mo of continuous process by two desktop computers. A second program then searched the two lists of reads for identically matching noise-exposed and control reads in each set and calculated the ratio of the two counts. Finally, matching reads with abundance ratios exceeding 3:1 in either direction were used for assembly, commencing with the highest and lowest ratios, and proceeding until a total of 500 different mRNA identifiable transcripts had been assembled.

Transcript Assembly and Abundance

Identified reads were used to assemble complete transcripts by the transcriptome walking algorithm (25) using an initial minimum overlap of 80 nucleotides. But increased overlap up to 95 was sometimes required to separate transcripts with common motifs or decreases to 60 overlaps for less abundant transcripts. Walking was always continued to identify the complete protein coding sequence, including both START and STOP codons. The walking steps attempted to identify each nucleotide from overlap of 40 reads and then used the highest quality 20 reads of each 40 for assembly. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were recorded where any alternate nucleotide contributed >10% of the reads, but all the reported transcripts represent the canonical sequences.

Only transcripts with complete reading frames that could be putatively identified by the BLAST algorithm (US National Library of Medicine) were accepted into the final collection of 500. In the process, a total of 79 assembled sequences were separately classified as noncoding, partial, or unknown transcripts.

Relative abundances of transcribed mRNA sequences in the two tissues were estimated by searching both complete groomed transcriptome libraries for reads matching the reading frame of each transcript, using the criterion of at least 90/100 identical nucleotide matches to score each read as derived from that transcript. Matching reads as a fraction of total reads counted were then normalized by reading frame length and expressed as abundance relative to the 40S ribosomal protein SA abundance in each transcriptome. This method has previously been found to agree closely with relative abundances estimated by quantitative PCR (26).

Fitting Relative Abundance Data

Abundance ratio values (Noise exposed/Control) were counted into histogram bins of 0.2 width (Fig. 2). The complete histogram was fitted by the Cauchy distribution (27):

f(x) =A/(1+((x−x0)/γ)2) (1)

where x is abundance ratio, x0 is the location parameter, γ is the half width at half maximum, and A is the value of f(x) at x = x0. Fitting was performed using a minimum squared error method. Confidence intervals were obtained from the normalized cumulative distribution function, F(x), at the desired values by successive approximation, using the fitted values of x0 and γ:

F(x) = 0.5 + (1/π) tan−1((x−x0)/γ) (2)

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of ratios of abundances of mRNA transcripts from Müller’s organs of control and noise-exposed locusts. Ratio values were counted into histogram bins of 0.2 width. The continuous line shows the best fitting Cauchy distribution (Eq. 1) with parameters x0 = 1.007, γ = 0.865. Dashed vertical lines indicate the 5% and 95% values of the normalized cumulative distribution (Eq. 2) using the same fitted parameters. Values below and above unity correspond to transcripts with reduced and increased abundance in noise-exposed animals, respectively. x0, location parameter; γ, half width at half maximum.

All transcript discovery, assembly, abundance estimation, data processing, and fitting was performed by custom written software using the C++ language and desktop computers.

RESULTS

A total of 500 mRNA transcripts were assembled to include the complete amino acid reading frame, and in many cases the complete 5′ and 3′ end sequences. Identification codes, abundances in the control and noise-exposed transcriptomes, and putative functions of all transcripts are given in Table 1. Full nucleotide sequences, reading frames, translations, and single nucleotide polymorphisms for all transcripts are available at http://asf-pht.medicine.dal.ca/SCH_Web/. Reading frames ranged from 159 to 15,450 nucleotides (53–5,150 amino acids) with average length 1,927 nucleotides. Based on hypotheses from previous studies (3, 7), we noted that the list of transcripts included seven mechanically activated ion channels, 32 transmembrane transporters or pumps, 24 voltage- or ligand-activated ion channels, and 66 transcription or translation factors.

Table 1.

Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts and abundances for control and noise-exposed animals

ID Code GenBank Control Noise Putative Function
SCH_0001 MW962393 −2.432 −2.253 Actin 1
SCH_0002 MK962884 −2.298 −2.272 TRPV cation channel Inactive
SCH_0003 MW962394 −0.374 −0.347 GAPDH
SCH_0004 MW962395 0.583 0.635 Actin 2
SCH_0005 MW962396 −2.804 −2.849 Adenylate cyclase type 2
SCH_0006 MW962397 −1.441 −1.643 Actin 3
SCH_0007 MW962398 −3.451 −3.396 Ankyrin repeat and death containing protein
SCH_0008 MW962399 −2.916 −2.959 TRPN cation channel NompC
SCH_0009 MW962400 −2.739 −2.785 Ankyrin repeat containing 27-like
SCH_0010 MW962401 −1.700 −1.781 Ankyrin repeat containing 54-like
SCH_0011 MW962402 −2.242 −2.259 Mariner Mos1 transpoase
SCH_0012 MW962403 −3.100 −3.161 Distal antennal-like
SCH_0013 MW962404 −1.673 −1.650 Basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein
SCH_0014 MW962405 −1.893 −1.883 NDUFAF4
SCH_0015 MW962406 −0.369 −0.877 Apolipophorin precursor
SCH_0016 MK962885 −2.172 −2.135 TRPV cation channel Nanchung
SCH_0017 MK962886 −2.258 −2.232 Piezo
SCH_0018 MW962407 −1.719 −1.717 Synaptophysin
SCH_0019 MW962408 −1.616 −1.588 Synaptotagmin
SCH_0020 MW962409 −1.169 −1.186 Synaptosomal-Associated Protein SNAP 25
SCH_0021 MW962410 −1.949 −1.981 Transmembrane channel TMC 7
SCH_0022 MW962411 −0.525 −0.487 Na/K ATPase
SCH_0023 MW962412 −2.086 −2.202 Solute carrier family 12
SCH_0024 MW962413 −1.964 −1.857 Bumetanide-sensitive K/Na/Cl transporter
SCH_0025 MW962414 −1.971 −2.015 Bumetanide-sensitive K/Na/Cl transporter
SCH_0026 MW962415 −2.400 −2.543 Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0027 MW962416 −3.193 −3.057 Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0028 MW962417 −1.697 −1.736 Ca-transporting ATPase
SCH_0029 MW962418 −3.319 −3.064 Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0030 MW962419 −2.423 −2.442 K channel Shaker
SCH_0031 MW962420 −1.965 −1.985 G-protein activated IR K channel
SCH_0032 MW962421 0.150 0.243 Tubulin alpha
SCH_0033 MW962422 0.194 0.236 Tubulin alpha
SCH_0034 MW962423 −0.143 −0.127 Tubulin alpha
SCH_0035 MW962424 −1.066 −1.081 Spectrin alpha chain
SCH_0036 MW962425 −2.797 −2.911 EAG K channel
SCH_0037 MW962426 −1.675 −1.654 MAP kinase-activated protein kinase
SCH_0038 MW962427 −1.748 −1.840 CaM kinase II
SCH_0039 MW962428 −1.588 −1.665 Protein kinase DC2
SCH_0040 MW962429 −2.095 −2.168 DENN domain containing protein
SCH_0041 MW962430 −1.714 −1.809 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0042 MW962431 −0.585 −0.472 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0043 MW962432 −0.270 −0.185 Aquaporin
SCH_0044 MW962433 −0.973 −2.136 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0045 MW962434 −1.152 −1.093 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0046 MW962435 −0.330 −0.200 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0047 MW962436 −0.756 −0.680 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0048 MW962437 −1.345 −1.282 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0049 MW962438 −1.279 −1.375 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0050 MW962439 −2.129 −2.077 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0051 MW962440 −1.214 −1.101 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0052 MW962441 −2.081 −2.116 Acetylcholine esterase
SCH_0053 MW962442 −1.773 −1.798 Serine-threonine protein phosphatase II
SCH_0054 MW962443 −1.726 −1.754 Serine-threonine protein phosphatase II
SCH_0055 MW962444 −1.974 −2.065 Beta-arrestin 1
SCH_0056 MW962445 −1.717 −1.623 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase
SCH_0057 MW962446 −2.408 −2.441 5-AMP-activated protein kinase catalytic subunit α2
SCH_0058 MW962447 −2.200 −2.247 Calcium/calmodulin-responsive adenylate cyclase
SCH_0059 MW962448 −2.440 −2.482 Adenylate cyclase type 9
SCH_0060 MW962449 −2.892 −2.892 Adenylate cyclase type 8
SCH_0061 MW962450 −1.786 −1.794 Ankyrin 3
SCH_0062 MW962451 −2.146 −2.175 Ankyrin 3
SCH_0063 MW962452 −1.272 −1.262 Argonaute 2
SCH_0064 MW962453 −2.462 −2.519 Argonaute 2
SCH_0065 MW962454 −2.484 −2.627 Argonaute 1
SCH_0066 MW962455 −2.708 −2.664 G protein-activated IR K channel
SCH_0067 MW962456 −1.809 −1.901 Spectrin beta chain
SCH_0068 MW962457 −2.955 −2.871 Ca-activated K channel slowpoke
SCH_0069 MW962458 −0.597 −0.586 ATP-dependent RNA helicase
SCH_0070 MW962459 −0.583 −0.584 ATP-dependent RNA helicase
SCH_0071 MW962460 −0.372 −0.425 ATP-dependent RNA helicase
SCH_0072 MW962461 −0.901 −0.911 Basigin
SCH_0073 MW962462 −0.737 −0.859 C-type lysozyme
SCH_0074 MW962463 −0.356 −0.306 Calmodulin
SCH_0075 MW962464 −0.626 −0.606 Calmodulin
SCH_0076 MW962465 −1.237 −1.262 Calpain
SCH_0077 MW962466 −0.435 −0.423 Calreticulin
SCH_0078 MW962467 −2.047 −2.085 Voltage-activated Na channel alpha subunit
SCH_0079 MW962468 −2.117 −2.062 Voltage-activated Cl channel CLC type
SCH_0080 MW962469 −1.551 −1.534 HCN channel
SCH_0081 MW962470 −1.344 −1.407 K channel subfamily K member
SCH_0082 MW962471 −1.622 −1.600 cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit
SCH_0083 MW962472 −1.398 −1.438 cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II regulatory subunit
SCH_0084 MW962473 −1.650 −1.611 Cryptochrome 2
SCH_0085 MW962474 −2.302 −2.306 Cryptochrome 2
SCH_0086 MW962475 −1.274 −1.271 CRAC Calcium release-activated calcium channel
SCH_0087 MW962476 −2.151 −2.155 Cyclin-dependent kinase 5
SCH_0088 MW962477 −2.006 −1.982 Diacylglycerol kinase epsilon
SCH_0089 MW962478 −1.788 −1.781 Diacylglycerol kinase theta
SCH_0090 MW962479 −2.007 −1.969 Protein kinase CP
SCH_0091 MW962480 −2.304 −2.345 Dicer 1
SCH_0092 MW962481 −0.204 0.085 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2
SCH_0093 MW962482 −1.611 −1.661 Epidermal growth factor receptor
SCH_0094 MW962483 −2.856 −2.774 Glycine receptor alpha subunit
SCH_0095 MW962484 −0.706 −0.581 Phe-4-monooxygenase (Henna)
SCH_0096 MW962485 −2.269 −2.281 Huntingtin
SCH_0097 MW962486 −2.111 −2.169 IP3 receptor
SCH_0098 MW962487 −2.465 −2.557 Peripheral plasma membrane protein CASK
SCH_0099 MW962488 −1.929 −1.939 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase parkin
SCH_0100 MW962489 −1.711 −1.705 Serine/threonine-protein kinase Tricorner
SCH_0101 MW962490 −2.165 −2.172 Serine/threonine-protein kinase Warts
SCH_0102 MW962491 −2.215 −2.301 Ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta
SCH_0103 MW962492 −1.726 −1.672 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase
SCH_0104 MW962493 −2.449 −2.571 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase
SCH_0105 MW962494 −1.142 −1.131 Na/H exchange regulatory cofactor
SCH_0106 MZ004840 −0.053 −0.012 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0107 MW962495 −2.124 −2.149 Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3- phosphatase
SCH_0108 MW962496 −0.122 −0.087 14-3-3 protein zeta
SCH_0109 MW962497 −0.682 −0.656 14-3-3 protein epsilon
SCH_0110 MW962498 −1.890 −1.963 5-oxoprolinase
SCH_0111 MW962499 −1.308 −1.327 Cation/H exchanger NHE
SCH_0112 MW962500 −1.544 −1.508 V-type proton ATPase subunit H
SCH_0113 MW962501 −1.189 −1.146 V-type proton ATPase subunit B
SCH_0114 MW962502 −1.145 −1.136 V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A
SCH_0115 MW962503 −1.152 −1.143 V-type proton ATPase subunit D
SCH_0116 MW962504 −0.864 −0.828 V-type proton ATPase subunit E
SCH_0117 MW962505 −1.747 −1.744 Calcium permeable stress-gated cation channel
SCH_0118 MW962506 −0.376 −0.268 Annexin B9
SCH_0119 MW962507 −0.902 −0.900 Annexin B9
SCH_0120 MW962508 −1.512 −1.494 Annulin
SCH_0121 MW962509 −1.336 −1.458 Hemocyte protein-glutamine γ-glutamyltransferase
SCH_0122 MW962510 −1.718 −1.683 Anoctamin (Ca-activated Cl channel)
SCH_0123 MW962511 −2.312 −2.347 Anoctamin (Ca-activated Cl channel)
SCH_0124 MW962512 −1.196 −1.103 Carbonic anhydrase
SCH_0125 MW962513 −0.865 −1.010 Carbonic anhydrase
SCH_0126 MW962514 −1.681 −1.774 Carbonic anhydrase
SCH_0127 MW962515 −0.234 −0.242 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4 A-II
SCH_0128 MW962516 −1.192 −1.420 Attractin-like
SCH_0129 MW962517 −2.724 −2.957 Attractin-like
SCH_0130 MW962518 −1.304 −1.205 Collagen alpha chain
SCH_0131 MW962519 −1.874 −1.829 Collagen alpha chain
SCH_0132 MW962520 −1.455 −1.373 Collagen apha chain
SCH_0133 MW962521 −1.931 −1.918 Chromatin-remodeling ATPase INO80
SCH_0134 MW962522 −2.197 −2.237 Helicase domino
SCH_0135 MW962523 −2.073 −2.016 Helicase-like
SCH_0136 MW962524 −2.231 −2.111 Eyes absent
SCH_0137 MW962525 −2.114 −2.312 Ecdysone receptor
SCH_0138 MW962526 −1.723 −1.872 Retinoid-X receptor
SCH_0139 MW962527 −2.500 −2.640 Embryonic gonad like
SCH_0140 MW962528 −2.690 −2.667 Nuclear hormone receptor
SCH_0141 MW962529 −2.745 −2.742 Nuclear hormone receptor
SCH_0142 MW962530 −2.109 −2.061 Early growth response protein
SCH_0143 MW962531 −3.147 −3.133 Tyramine receptor
SCH_0144 MW962532 0.141 0.332 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 4
SCH_0145 MW962533 −1.460 −1.232 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 3
SCH_0146 MW962534 −2.996 −3.032 Na/Ca exchanger
SCH_0147 MW962535 −2.210 −2.238 Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0148 MW962536 −2.184 −2.207 GABA A receptor beta subunit
SCH_0149 MW962537 −1.654 −1.560 Glutamate-gated chloride channel
SCH_0150 MW962538 −2.410 −2.447 Glutamate-gated chloride channel
SCH_0151 MW962539 −2.684 −2.754 GABA B receptor subunit 1
SCH_0152 MW962540 −2.554 −2.545 Choline acetyltransferase
SCH_0153 MW962541 −3.304 −3.440 GABA B receptor subunit 2
SCH_0154 MW962542 −2.235 −2.238 Sodium bicarbonate cotransporter
SCH_0155 MW962543 −1.437 −1.524 Band 3 anion transporter
SCH_0156 MW962544 −1.118 −1.194 Dystonin
SCH_0157 MW962545 −1.277 −1.265 Microtubule-associated protein
SCH_0158 MW962546 −1.387 −1.379 Microtubule-associated serine-threonine kinase
SCH_0159 MW962547 −2.178 −2.221 Microtubule-associated serine-threonine kinase
SCH_0160 MW962548 −2.142 −2.154 Serine-threonine kinase sgk-like
SCH_0161 MW962549 −1.573 −1.527 Serine-threonine kinase grp
SCH_0162 MW962550 −1.913 −1.881 Tubulin gamma
SCH_0163 MW962551 −1.890 −2.230 Myosin heavy chain
SCH_0164 MW962552 −1.899 −2.155 Myosin light chain
SCH_0165 MW962553 −1.991 −2.015 TRPML3 (mucolipin 3)
SCH_0166 MW962554 −3.189 −3.174 Pickpocket (ENaC, ASIC family)
SCH_0167 MW962555 −2.869 −2.891 Glutamate-gated chloride channel
SCH_0168 MW962556 −2.171 −2.285 Transcriptional repressor Scratch
SCH_0169 MW962557 −2.176 −2.182 Zinc finger protein 432-like
SCH_0170 MW962558 −2.308 −2.339 Locust corazonin-related transcriptional factor
SCH_0171 MW962559 −1.963 −1.960 Zinc finger protein 271-like
SCH_0172 MW962560 −1.629 −1.602 Zinc finger protein 271-like
SCH_0173 MW962561 −2.338 −2.367 Zinc finger protein 236-like
SCH_0174 MW962562 −2.115 −2.107 Zinc finger protein 62-like
SCH_0175 MW962563 −2.560 −2.489 Zinc finger protein 341-like
SCH_0176 MW962564 −2.368 −2.308 Zinc finger protein 271-like
SCH_0177 MW962565 −2.430 −2.368 Zinc finger protein 813-like
SCH_0178 MW962566 −2.251 −2.220 Zinc finger protein 32-like
SCH_0179 MW962567 −2.218 −2.218 Zinc finger protein 135-like
SCH_0180 MW962568 −2.333 −2.358 Zinc finger protein 569-like
SCH_0181 MW962569 −1.986 −2.012 Zinc finger protein 2-like
SCH_0182 MW962570 −1.899 −1.917 Dicer 2
SCH_0183 MW962571 −1.449 −1.455 Eukaryotic initiation factor 3 A
SCH_0184 MW962572 0.378 0.378 Elongation factor 1 alpha
SCH_0185 MW962573 −1.107 −1.079 Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 subunit 1
SCH_0186 MW962574 −2.109 −2.095 DSCAM 2
SCH_0187 MW962575 −2.137 −2.150 Dynamin
SCH_0188 MW962576 −2.143 −2.154 Dynamin
SCH_0189 MW962577 −1.793 −1.791 Dynamin
SCH_0190 MW962578 −2.027 −2.053 Enhancer of sevenless 2B
SCH_0191 MW962579 −1.190 −1.188 Lamin Dm0
SCH_0192 MW962580 −1.867 −1.853 E3 ubuquitin-protein kinase RNF123
SCH_0193 MW962581 −0.711 −0.670 Voltage-dependent anion channel
SCH_0194 MW962582 −1.677 −1.673 L-type calcium channel beta subunit
SCH_0195 MW962583 −1.863 −1.868 L-type calcium channel beta subunit
SCH_0196 MW962584 −0.654 −0.602 Chitin deacetylase
SCH_0197 MW962585 −0.490 −0.349 Chitin deacetylase
SCH_0198 MW962586 −1.079 −0.987 Chitin deacetylase
SCH_0199 MW962587 −1.911 −2.319 Troponin
SCH_0200 MW962588 −1.456 −1.505 Alpha actinin
SCH_0201 MW962589 −1.197 −1.200 Spectrin beta chain
SCH_0202 MW962590 −1.471 −1.460 Lola - longitdinals lacking
SCH_0203 MW962591 −1.459 −1.483 Bric-a-brac-like
SCH_0204 MW962592 −1.147 −1.162 BTG 2
SCH_0205 MW962593 −1.572 −1.593 BTG 3
SCH_0206 MW962594 −1.518 −1.547 Calcium-transporting ATPase
SCH_0207 MW962595 −2.647 −2.688 Neural cadherin
SCH_0208 MW962596 0.719 −0.424 Vitellogenin A
SCH_0209 MW962597 −0.872 −0.875 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-17 kDA
SCH_0210 MZ004841 0.864 0.877 Cytochrome B (mitochondrial)
SCH_0211 MW962598 −0.836 −0.816 Ras-related protein Rab 1 A
SCH_0212 MZ004842 1.323 1.341 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0213 MW962599 0.352 0.358 ATP-ADP translocator
SCH_0214 MW962600 −0.304 −0.229 Arginine kinase
SCH_0215 MW962601 0.622 0.194 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0216 MW962602 −0.150 −0.129 40S ribosomal protein S4
SCH_0217 MW962603 −0.166 −0.198 Polyubiquitin
SCH_0218 MW962604 −0.457 −0.357 Heat shock protein 90
SCH_0219 MW962605 0.235 0.062 Imaginal disc growth factor
SCH_0220 MW962606 0.348 0.355 Tubulin beta
SCH_0221 MW962607 −0.478 −0.535 Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]
SCH_0222 MW962608 −1.530 −1.607 Lacunin
SCH_0223 MZ004843 0.999 1.009 ATP synthase F0 subunit 6 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0224 MZ004844 0.919 0.941 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0225 MW962609 0.376 0.360 Icarapin-like
SCH_0226 MZ004845 0.976 1.002 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0227 MW962610 0.687 −0.458 Vitellogenin B
SCH_0228 MW962611 0.437 −0.580 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0229 MW962612 0.000 0.000 40S ribosomal protein SA
SCH_0230 MW962613 −0.979 −0.972 Sortilin-related receptor
SCH_0231 MW962614 −0.782 −0.597 Pacifastin-related peptide precursor
SCH_0232 MW962615 −0.120 −0.019 Transferrin
SCH_0233 MW962616 0.317 −0.216 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0234 MW962617 −0.348 −0.268 Thioredoxin 2-like
SCH_0235 MW962618 0.514 0.557 Heat shock protein 70
SCH_0236 MW962619 −0.394 −0.427 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5
SCH_0237 MW962620 −0.206 −0.181 60S ribosomal protein L19
SCH_0238 MW962621 −1.711 −1.663 Solute carrier family 25 member 44
SCH_0239 MW962622 −0.346 −0.333 ATP synthase subunit alpha (mitochondrial)
SCH_0240 MW962623 −0.774 −0.723 NDRG3
SCH_0241 MW962624 0.100 0.123 Activating transcription factor of chaperone
SCH_0242 MW962625 −0.606 −0.618 Ly 6 neurotoxin
SCH_0243 MW962626 −2.951 −3.012 Glutamate receptor, ionotropic
SCH_0244 MW962627 0.081 0.039 Ferritin heavy subunit
SCH_0245 MW962628 −0.720 −0.969 Facilitated trehalose transporter
SCH_0246 MW962629 −0.910 −0.834 Innexin 2
SCH_0247 MW962630 −0.087 −0.440 Gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase
SCH_0248 MW962631 −0.376 −0.355 Ly 6 neurotoxin
SCH_0249 MW962632 0.045 0.137 Tubulin beta
SCH_0250 MW962633 −0.215 −0.162 Midline fasciclin
SCH_0251 MW962634 −1.321 −1.316 GTP-binding protein sar1
SCH_0252 MW962635 −0.492 −0.544 Legumain
SCH_0253 MW962636 −1.576 −1.597 Membrane-associated protein sar1
SCH_0254 MW962637 −1.933 −1.906 Exocyst complex component 5
SCH_0255 MW962638 −1.983 −2.577 GILT-like
SCH_0256 MW962639 −1.744 −1.850 Fibrillin 2
SCH_0257 MW962640 −1.395 −1.402 CLCN3 H/Cl exchange transporter 3
SCH_0258 MW962641 −1.209 −1.182 DNA topoisomerase (mitochondrial)
SCH_0259 MW962642 −1.448 −1.420 Farnesol dehydrogenase
SCH_0260 MW962643 −1.704 −1.750 CLUH Clustered mitochondrial protein homolog
SCH_0261 MW962644 −1.292 −1.282 Alpha-2-macroglobulin receptor-associated protein
SCH_0262 MW962645 −0.618 −0.638 Integral membrane protein 2 C
SCH_0263 MW962646 −1.654 −1.651 Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] γ-subunit (mitochondrial)
SCH_0264 MW962647 −0.967 −0.959 Phosphoglycerate mutase 2
SCH_0265 MW962648 0.215 0.214 Translationally-controlled tumor protein
SCH_0266 MW962649 −0.651 −0.678 ADP-ribosylation factor 1
SCH_0267 MW962650 −1.525 −1.548 Solute carrier family 22
SCH_0268 MW962651 −0.026 0.039 Defense protein
SCH_0269 MW962652 −1.389 −1.407 Integrin
SCH_0270 MW962653 −0.951 −1.005 Nose resistant to fluoxetine protein 6
SCH_0271 MW962654 −1.514 −1.491 GTP-binding protein 128up
SCH_0272 MW962655 −0.921 −0.912 Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit (mitochondrial)
SCH_0273 MW962656 −0.320 −0.196 Spermine synthase
SCH_0274 MW962657 −1.188 −1.163 Carbohydrate sulfotransferase 11
SCH_0275 MW962658 −2.080 −2.060 Uridine-cytidine kinase-like 1
SCH_0276 MW962659 −0.435 −0.437 Protein krasavietz
SCH_0277 MW962660 −0.114 −0.394 Nuclear protein 1
SCH_0278 MW962661 0.074 0.085 Elongation factor 2
SCH_0279 MW962662 −0.610 −0.765 Peroxiredoxin 6
SCH_0280 MW962663 0.039 0.074 Chemosensory protein precursor
SCH_0281 MW962664 −0.063 −0.102 Polyadenylate-binding protein 1
SCH_0282 MW962665 −0.712 −0.699 Poly(U)-specific endoribonuclease
SCH_0283 MW962666 −1.029 −0.957 Sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 1-A
SCH_0284 MW962667 −1.285 −1.252 N-acetyltransferase san
SCH_0285 MW962668 −1.266 −1.287 ABC transporter G family member 23
SCH_0286 MW962669 −1.983 −1.994 Tetratricopeptide Repeat TANC2
SCH_0287 MW962670 −1.538 −1.602 Transmembrane protein 53
SCH_0288 MW962671 −1.027 −1.397 Pancreatic lipase-related protein 2
SCH_0289 MW962672 −1.188 −1.204 Singed
SCH_0290 MW962673 0.212 −0.104 Apolipophorin III
SCH_0291 MW962674 −1.744 −1.810 Myelin regulatory factor
SCH_0292 MW962675 −0.862 −0.841 CHCHD10 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0293 MW962676 −0.574 −0.502 Dynein light chain A
SCH_0294 MW962677 −1.476 −1.491 Transcription factor CP2
SCH_0295 MW962678 −0.435 −0.438 Profilin
SCH_0296 MW962679 −1.549 −1.537 Nicastrin
SCH_0297 MW962680 −0.390 −0.415 Inhibitor of apoptosis
SCH_0298 MW962681 −0.612 −0.573 Leupaxin
SCH_0299 MW962682 −0.687 −0.669 Transcription factor BTF3
SCH_0300 MW962683 −1.268 −1.325 Atlastin
SCH_0301 MW962684 −0.873 −0.877 Beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase
SCH_0302 MW962685 −0.311 −0.219 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 5
SCH_0303 MW962686 −0.030 −0.073 Ferritin subunit
SCH_0304 MW962687 −1.159 −1.139 Actin-binding LIM protein 3
SCH_0305 MW962688 −0.240 −0.288 Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase
SCH_0306 MZ004846 −0.114 −0.283 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0307 MW962689 −0.289 −0.255 40S ribosomal protein S24
SCH_0308 MW962690 −0.232 −0.057 Chemosensory protein CSP-sg4
SCH_0309 MW962691 −0.850 −0.864 Double-stranded RNA-binding protein Staufen
SCH_0310 MW962692 −0.246 −0.197 Myophilin
SCH_0311 MW962693 −0.246 −0.242 ATP-synthase subunit beta
SCH_0312 MW962694 −2.208 −2.197 Aminopeptidase N
SCH_0313 MW962695 −1.770 −1.750 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1
SCH_0314 MW962696 −1.938 −1.892 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 9
SCH_0315 MW962697 −1.831 −1.853 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase Lar
SCH_0316 MW962698 −2.161 −2.187 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4
SCH_0317 MW962699 −1.932 −1.938 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 69 D
SCH_0318 MW962700 −1.871 −1.847 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 99 A
SCH_0319 MW962701 −1.970 −2.238 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 5-like
SCH_0320 MW962702 −1.762 −1.729 Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase N2
SCH_0321 MW962703 −2.517 −2.642 Tyrosine−protein phosphatase non-receptor type 14
SCH_0322 MW962704 −1.642 −1.652 Presenilin
SCH_0323 MW962705 −1.443 −1.444 Zinc finger protein 330 homolog
SCH_0324 MW962706 −0.788 −0.306 Chemosensory protein precursor
SCH_0325 MW962707 −0.240 −0.224 60S ribosomal protein L36
SCH_0326 MW962708 −0.400 −0.366 60S ribosomal protein L18a
SCH_0327 MW962709 −0.879 −0.739 Serpin
SCH_0328 MW962710 −0.733 −0.764 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 2
SCH_0329 MW962711 −1.852 −1.812 Mitochondrial intermediate peptidase
SCH_0330 MW962712 −1.207 −1.176 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit D
SCH_0331 MW962713 −1.397 −1.616 Cystathionine beta-synthase
SCH_0332 MW962714 −0.140 −0.796 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0333 MW962715 −1.296 −1.313 rap1 GTPase-activating protein 1
SCH_0334 MW962716 −2.852 −2.910 Glutamate receptor, ionotropic
SCH_0335 MW962717 −2.721 −2.817 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, beta subunit
SCH_0336 MW962718 −2.336 −2.349 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, alpha subunit
SCH_0337 MW962719 −1.228 −1.301 Aldehyde dehydrogenase
SCH_0338 MW962720 −1.435 −1.439 Coatomer subunit delta
SCH_0339 MW962721 −0.576 −0.543 Histone H3
SCH_0340 MW962722 −1.256 −1.226 Proton-coupled amino acid transporter-like
SCH_0341 MW962723 −0.912 −0.921 Ras-related protein rab7
SCH_0342 MW962724 −1.463 −1.462 Programmed cell death protein 10
SCH_0343 MW962725 −1.666 −1.639 Adenosylhomocysteinase
SCH_0344 MW962726 −0.992 −1.033 ATP-citrate synthase
SCH_0345 MW962727 −1.307 −1.279 Armadillo
SCH_0346 MW962728 −1.591 −1.579 Enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase
SCH_0347 MW962729 −0.936 −1.049 Vigilin
SCH_0348 MW962730 −0.487 −0.495 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase
SCH_0349 MZ004847 0.020 0.050 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (mitochondrial)
SCH_0350 MW962731 −0.796 −0.316 Chemosensory protein
SCH_0351 MW962732 −0.639 −0.661 DnaJ subfamily A member 2
SCH_0352 MW962733 −1.034 −1.052 Angiotensin-converting enzyme
SCH_0353 MW962734 −0.760 −0.735 Myosin regulatory light chain sqh
SCH_0354 MW962735 −0.920 −0.855 Succinate dehydrogenase
SCH_0355 MW962736 −1.413 −1.372 Glucose-induced degradation protein 8
SCH_0356 MW962737 −0.965 −0.984 Nascent polypeptide-associated complex α-subunit
SCH_0357 MW962738 −0.898 −0.899 Splicing factor U2AF 50 kDa subunit
SCH_0358 MW962739 −1.581 −1.445 Proton-coupled amino acid transporter-like CG1139
SCH_0359 MW962740 −0.240 −0.212 40S ribosomal protein S10-like
SCH_0360 MW962741 −0.341 −0.349 Prosaposin
SCH_0361 MW962742 −0.652 −0.709 Cathepsin B
SCH_0362 MW962743 −0.201 −0.865 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0363 MW962744 −1.349 −1.514 Cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase
SCH_0364 MW962745 −1.276 −1.278 Peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19
SCH_0365 MW962746 −0.876 −0.845 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K
SCH_0366 MW962747 −2.299 −2.376 Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase K
SCH_0367 MW962748 −0.410 −0.455 Ornithine decarboxylase
SCH_0368 MW962749 −0.168 −0.123 60S ribosomal protein L7a
SCH_0369 MW962750 −1.603 −1.589 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX54
SCH_0370 MW962751 −1.714 −1.708 Apoptosis-inducing factor 1, mitochondrial
SCH_0371 MW962752 −0.943 −0.899 DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC3
SCH_0372 MW962753 −0.306 −0.294 ADP, ATP carrier protein
SCH_0373 MW962754 −1.065 −1.082 ATP-dependent RNA helicase dbp2
SCH_0374 MW962755 −1.408 −1.473 Aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic-like
SCH_0375 MW962756 −1.550 −1.503 Protein 5NUC
SCH_0376 MW962757 −0.702 −0.604 Sigma glutathione S-transferase
SCH_0377 MW962758 −1.787 −1.745 DEAD-box helicase Dbp80
SCH_0378 MW962759 −1.644 −1.642 Hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase, mitochondrial
SCH_0379 MW962760 −2.156 −2.098 Ribitol-5-phosphate xylosyltransferase 1
SCH_0380 MW962761 −1.381 −1.359 Dihydropyrimidinase
SCH_0381 MW962762 −0.716 −0.648 Protein stunted
SCH_0382 MW962763 −0.799 −0.737 Cytochrome b reductase 1
SCH_0383 MW962764 −1.407 −1.324 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit K
SCH_0384 MW962765 −1.562 −1.567 WASH complex subunit 3
SCH_0385 MW962766 −0.319 −0.302 40S ribosomal protein S16
SCH_0386 MW962767 −0.356 −0.329 60S ribosomal protein L15
SCH_0387 MW962768 −1.392 −0.916 Lysozyme-like
SCH_0388 MW962769 −1.403 −1.376 Proteasome subunit alpha type-2
SCH_0389 MW962770 −0.607 −0.556 Protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1
SCH_0390 MW962771 −1.148 −1.140 Charged multivesicular body protein 4c
SCH_0391 MW962772 −0.516 −0.518 Malate dehydrogenase
SCH_0392 MW962773 −0.953 −0.950 Mid1-interacting protein 1
SCH_0393 MW962774 −0.152 −0.127 60S ribosomal protein L18
SCH_0394 MW962775 −1.344 −1.367 GDAP2 homolog
SCH_0395 MW962776 −0.501 −0.456 Heat shock protein 20.6
SCH_0396 MW962777 −1.294 −1.291 ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 2
SCH_0397 MW962778 −0.572 −1.071 Prostatic acid phosphatase
SCH_0398 MW962779 −0.641 −0.620 S-phase kinase-associated protein 1
SCH_0399 MW962780 −0.242 −0.210 60S ribosomal protein L8
SCH_0400 MW962781 −1.362 −1.388 Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5-like
SCH_0401 MW962782 −1.100 −1.167 Tudor-SN
SCH_0402 MW962783 −1.050 −1.068 CYP450
SCH_0403 MW962784 −1.246 −1.431 Trehalase
SCH_0404 MW962785 −1.132 −1.131 Peroxisomal membrane protein 2
SCH_0405 MW962786 −0.943 −0.954 Angiotensin-converting enzyme
SCH_0406 MW962787 −0.321 −0.298 60S ribosomal protein L4
SCH_0407 MW962788 −0.975 −0.970 Na/K ATPase beta
SCH_0408 MW962789 −0.607 −0.631 Glutathione S-transferase delta
SCH_0409 MW962790 −0.497 −0.472 Phosphate carrier 2
SCH_0410 MW962791 −2.200 −2.239 Phosphate carrier 1
SCH_0411 MW962792 −1.636 −1.625 Transcription factor MafK
SCH_0412 MW962793 −1.334 −1.370 Segmentation protein cap'n'collar
SCH_0413 MW962794 −1.110 −1.057 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 i
SCH_0414 MW962795 −1.803 −1.811 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 15-like
SCH_0415 MW962796 −1.292 −1.316 Acyl-CoA-binding protein homolog
SCH_0416 MW962797 −1.576 −1.606 Pyroglutamyl-peptidase 1
SCH_0417 MW962798 −1.615 −1.627 Zeta glutathione S-transferase
SCH_0418 MW962799 −2.145 −2.233 SAX-3
SCH_0419 MW962800 −1.540 −1.619 5-aminolevulinate synthase, erythroid-specific, mitochondrial
SCH_0420 MW962801 −0.923 −0.922 Nucleobindin-2
SCH_0421 MW962802 −1.989 −2.039 Dyslexia-associated protein KIAA0319-like
SCH_0422 MW962803 −0.604 −0.601 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 5
SCH_0423 MW962804 −0.513 −0.489 Thymosin
SCH_0424 MW962805 −1.308 −1.256 Fatty acyl-CoA reductase
SCH_0425 MW962806 −1.289 −1.231 T-complex protein subunit eta
SCH_0426 MW962807 −0.609 −1.585 Timeless
SCH_0427 MW962808 −1.071 −1.066 Cuticlin-1
SCH_0428 MW962809 −1.146 −1.140 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C
SCH_0429 MW962810 −1.330 −1.399 Ig-like and fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 1
SCH_0430 MW962811 −1.320 −1.314 CD109 antigen-like
SCH_0431 MW962812 −1.545 −1.541 Poly(rC)-binding protein 3
SCH_0432 MW962813 −0.541 −0.555 tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase
SCH_0433 MW962814 −0.795 −0.804 Enolase
SCH_0434 MW962815 −1.397 −1.401 NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-2
SCH_0435 MW962816 −1.603 −1.600 TM2 domain-containing protein CG11103
SCH_0436 MW962817 −1.525 −1.527 Dynein beta chain, ciliary
SCH_0437 MW962818 −0.981 −0.968 Peroxidase
SCH_0438 MW962819 −1.491 −1.487 Phospholipid phosphatase 2
SCH_0439 MW962820 −1.544 −1.586 Draper
SCH_0440 MW962821 −0.378 −0.398 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 A
SCH_0441 MW962822 −0.061 −0.081 40S ribosomal protein S20
SCH_0442 MW962823 −0.286 −0.163 Chemosensory protein
SCH_0443 MW962824 −1.139 −0.964 Cytochrome P450 CYP4G102
SCH_0444 MW962825 −0.908 −0.920 Leucine-rich repeat protein SHOC-2
SCH_0445 MW962826 −0.610 −0.664 Y-box factor homolog
SCH_0446 MW962827 −1.889 −1.857 Zinc transporter 9
SCH_0447 MW962828 −1.604 −1.265 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2
SCH_0448 MW962829 −1.744 −1.338 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 8
SCH_0449 MW962830 −1.290 −1.286 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit B
SCH_0450 MW962831 −1.217 −1.153 Apyrase
SCH_0451 MW962832 −1.550 −1.539 Myotubularin-related protein 9
SCH_0452 MW962833 −1.067 −1.077 Ras-related protein Rab-5C
SCH_0453 MW962834 −1.482 −1.453 Proteasome subunit alpha type-6
SCH_0454 MW962835 −0.649 −0.827 Serine protease 42
SCH_0455 MW962836 −1.732 −1.749 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD1
SCH_0456 MW962837 −2.694 −2.668 EHMT2 histone-lysine N-methyltransferase
SCH_0457 MW962838 −0.928 −0.971 Enoyl-CoA hydratase, mitochondrial
SCH_0458 MW962839 −1.312 −1.237 Transcription factor Kayak
SCH_0459 MW962840 −2.248 −2.277 Zinc finger protein 674-like
SCH_0460 MW962841 −3.194 −3.182 DNA methyltransferase 1
SCH_0461 MW962842 −1.041 −1.088 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit J
SCH_0462 MW962843 −0.930 −0.907 Myeloid leukemia factor
SCH_0463 MW962844 −0.717 −0.648 Stathmin
SCH_0464 MW962845 −1.705 −1.741 Gualynate kinase
SCH_0465 MW962846 −1.234 −1.237 Kinase D-interacting substrate of 220 kDA
SCH_0466 MW962847 −1.551 −1.603 Thaumatin-like
SCH_0467 MW962848 −1.010 −1.389 Clavesin-1
SCH_0468 MW962849 −1.486 −1.455 Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like
SCH_0469 MW962850 −0.759 −0.774 ras-like GTP-binding protein Rho1
SCH_0470 MW962851 −1.723 −1.743 Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 4
SCH_0471 MW962852 −1.792 −1.777 Lethal(2) giant larvae protein
SCH_0472 MW962853 −0.530 −0.528 Iron-sulfur cluster assembly scaffold protein IscU
SCH_0473 MW962854 −0.840 −0.799 GABA receptor-associated protein
SCH_0474 MW962855 −0.635 −1.787 Greglin
SCH_0475 MW962856 −1.938 −2.109 Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase
SCH_0476 MW962857 −1.221 −1.412 D-arabinitol dehydrogenase 1
SCH_0477 MW962858 −0.724 −1.045 Lipoyltransferase 1
SCH_0478 MW962859 −1.115 −1.429 Multifunctional protein ADE2
SCH_0479 MW962860 −1.054 −1.088 Gelsolin
SCH_0480 MW962861 −1.094 −1.086 Upregulated during skeletal muscle growth 5
SCH_0481 MW962862 −0.356 −0.328 Cysteine-rich protein 1
SCH_0482 MW962863 −0.249 −0.210 40S ribosomal protein S7
SCH_0483 MW962864 −0.147 −0.129 40S ribosomal protein S8
SCH_0484 MW962865 −0.180 −0.144 40S ribosomal protein S3a
SCH_0485 MW962866 −1.089 −1.042 Protein D2
SCH_0486 MW962867 −0.500 −0.523 X-box-binding protein 1
SCH_0487 MW962868 −1.197 −1.014 Lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF α-factor
SCH_0488 MW962869 −2.720 −2.827 Dimmed
SCH_0489 MW962870 −3.474 −3.463 Homeobox protein six1
SCH_0490 MW962871 −1.466 −1.467 Dynein heavy chain, cytoplasmic
SCH_0491 MW962872 −0.974 −0.949 Growth hormone-inducible transmembrane protein-like
SCH_0492 MW962873 −0.407 −0.553 MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine-proteinkinase 1
SCH_0493 MW962874 −0.510 −0.695 Catalase
SCH_0494 MW962875 −0.723 −0.804 Transketolase
SCH_0495 MW962876 −0.836 −0.793 Proteoglycan carrier of wingless
SCH_0496 MW962877 −1.300 −1.362 Lachesin
SCH_0497 MW962878 −0.785 −1.110 Acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase
SCH_0498 MW962879 −1.058 −0.993 Obstructor D2
SCH_0499 MW962880 −0.650 −0.654 Merlin (moesin-ezrin-radixin-like)
SCH_0500 MW962881 −1.288 −1.238 Huntingtin-interacting protein K

Abundance values are given as log10([mRNA of X]/[mRNA of 40S Ribosomal protein SA]). Functions are taken from the most similar BLAST search using default parameters. A list in alphabetical function order is available at http://asf-pht.medicine.dal.ca/SCH_Web/.

Distribution of Abundance Ratios

Abundance measurements were obtained by counting all the reads in each transcriptome that had overlapping agreement with a minimum or 90 contiguous nucleotides of the reading frame. The raw average ratio of all abundances (noise exposed/control) was 1.065, indicating close similarity between the general properties of the two transcriptomes. All abundances were normalized by the abundances of 40S Ribosomal SA transcripts in the two transcriptomes, yielding an average normalized ratio of 0.993.

The distribution of abundance ratios was wide, ranging from 0.069 to 3.038 (noise exposed/control), with a narrow peak near 1.0 (Fig. 2). This experimental distribution failed several tests for normality. For example, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test rejected the null hypothesis for normality with P < 0.001, and the Q-Q plot against the normal distribution was strongly nonlinear. In contrast, the Cauchy distribution (Eq. 1), which has previously been used for ratios of normally distributed variables (27), gave a close approximation over the entire range with parameters: x0 = 1.007, and γ = 0.865. The Cauchy distribution has no meaningful mean or variance values, but the median and mode are both equal to x0.

Given the single transcriptome data from each condition, and the nature of the ratio distribution, it was impossible to assign statistical significance to individual transcript ratios. Instead, we arbitrarily selected extreme low and high ratios in the cumulative distribution function (Eq. 2) from the lowest and highest 5% of the fitted distribution. All other ratios were not considered to be different from the expected distribution around 1.0.

Transcripts Affected by Noise Exposure

Transcripts with abundance ratios outside the 5% limits of both tails of the distribution are shown in Fig. 3. Table 2 lists the numerical values of the eight transcripts that we identified as increased by noise exposure. The list includes four endocuticle structural glycoprotein genes, and we note that another member of this gene group (SgAbd4, code: SCH_0144) fell just below the 5% list. The two most elevated transcripts encode a chemosensory protein precursor and a chemosensory protein. Completing the list are one of the four Na+/H+ exchangers that we found, and a lysozyme-like transcript.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Transcripts at the two tails of the abundance distribution. Numerical values of the abundance ratios are given in Tables 2 and 3. Upper group have ratios above 95% of the cumulative distribution, and lower group have ratios below 5%. Dashed line shows the expected ratio of 1.0 for a transcript unaffected by noise exposure. SgAbd genes are members of the cuticular structural glycoprotein family. Na+/H+ indicates a sodium/proton ion exchanger. Transcripts with identical gene names have different nucleotide sequences and amino acid sequences (no overlapping reads) but matched genes with the same putative identity by BLAST search.

Table 2.

Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts having increased abundance in noise-exposed animals (abundance ratios >95% of all transcripts)

ID Code Noise/Control Putative Function
SCH_0145 1.689 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 3
SCH_0029 1.799 Na/H Exchanger
SCH_0092 1.947 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2
SCH_0447 2.180 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2
SCH_0448 2.546 Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 8
SCH_0387 2.996 Lysozyme-like
SCH_0350 3.020 Chemosensory protein
SCH_0324 3.038 Chemosensory protein precursor

Table 3 lists the 18 transcripts that were most reduced by noise exposure. The list contains several genes associated with lipid storage and transport (vitellogenins, apolipophorin, gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase, and pancreatic lipase-related protein). Also reduced were transcripts for protein storage (hexamerins), muscle (troponin and myosin), neuron-related proteins (clavesin and timeless), plus several enzymes with a range of possible functions (carboxylesterase, greglin, GILT-like, and prostatic acid phosphatase).

Table 3.

Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts having reduced abundance in noise-exposed animals (abundance ratios <95% of all transcripts)

ID Code Noise/Control Putative Function
SCH_0044 0.069 Carboxylesterase
SCH_0474 0.071 Greglin
SCH_0227 0.072 Vitellogenin B
SCH_0208 0.072 Vitellogenin A
SCH_0228 0.096 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0426 0.106 Timeless
SCH_0362 0.217 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0332 0.221 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0255 0.255 GILT-like
SCH_0233 0.293 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0015 0.310 Apolipophorin precursor
SCH_0397 0.317 Prostatic acid phosphatase
SCH_0215 0.373 Hexamerin-like
SCH_0199 0.390 Troponin
SCH_0467 0.418 Clavesin-1
SCH_0288 0.427 Pancreatic lipase-related protein 2
SCH_0247 0.444 Gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase
SCH_0163 0.457 Myosin heavy chain

Transcription Factors Related to Sound Sensation

The amino acid sequences of the complete list of 66 possible transcription factors were compared by BLAST against the four genes recently associated with sound transduction in a study of age-related Drosophila deafness (7). No direct orthologs were identified but three Drosophila genes, optix, worniu, and amos, had amino acid sequences with more than 55% identity to locust transcripts (Table 4).

Table 4.

Drosophila genes linked to age related deafness (7) with the most similar transcripts from Table 1

Drosophila Name GenBank Code Locust ID, Name Identical/Similar
Optix NP_524695.2 SCH_0489, Six1 57% / 74%
Worniu NP_476601.1 SCH_0168, Scratch 58% / 69%
Amos ALC39557.1 SCH_0488, Dimmed 54% / 76%

Notes: Alternate names for optix are Dmel and Six3. Alternate names for amos are helix-loop-helix, absent MD neurons, reduced olfactory organs, and rough eye. Worniu also matches many zinc finger transcription factors with lower similarity.

DISCUSSION

We cannot claim to have identified every gene transcript in Müller’s organ whose abundance was changed by noise exposure, but genes participating in most major functions were probably found. We might have failed to identify very low abundance transcripts, but we saw abundance values over almost 5 log units and in all the expected major functional groups.

Abundance Ratio Distributions and the Significance of Ratio Measurements

Changes in gene transcript abundance provide an important window into processes such as cancer development, aging, drug therapies, sensory stimulation, etc. and are encouraged by the increasing quality and availability of transcriptome data. But how significant are measured abundance ratios, compared to the experimental variability? A review of approaches to abundance ratio analysis, primarily for human cancer work, pointed out that reads are not often uniformly distributed along transcripts, and that total transcriptome reads from each gene provide an important, often ignored measure (28).

We based our approach on the previous finding that counting all the reads matching the coding frame gave relative abundance values that agreed with quantitative PCR measurements (26). The Cauchy distribution (27) can arise from the ratio of two normally distributed random variables with zero means. In the current situation, we had only single measurements of each abundance (control and noise exposed), but it is reasonable to assume that many independently made transcriptomes, each with multiple steps between tissue and final sequencing, would produce normally distributed abundance values for each transcript. This issue is worth exploring when multiple repeated transcriptomes become more feasible.

The shape of the Cauchy distribution implies that relatively large changes in gene expression ratios are difficult to interpret. For example, a 50% change might be impressive on a bar graph but would only fall within the expected range of Fig. 2. This could have important consequences for interpreting the increasing amount of transcriptome data encountered in clinical and experimental work.

Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Müller’s Organ

The two most strongly increased transcripts (Fig. 3, Table 2) encode chemosensory proteins. Although this family is eponymously involved in chemical sensation, they are widespread across tissues and phyla, with a range of functions based on binding to lipids (29). They have also been associated with development and modification of the integument (30). This agrees with the finding that four of the other increased transcripts encode structural glycoproteins that are used to construct the endocuticle layer of the integument. Increased expression of homologous transcripts in different termite castes was associated with increased thickness and hardness of the endocuticle (31), so noise exposure probably caused a thicker, harder tympanum. Another increased transcript was a lysozyme-like. These enzymes break glycosidic bonds, including those in chitin, supporting the picture of cuticle remodeling. However, apolipophorins are also involved in cuticular construction (32) and some of these were substantially reduced (Fig. 3).

Insect ears, like human ears, use active movement to improve sensitivity (6, 7). Our previous study found that noise exposure caused increased displacement of the tympanum by sound (3) and suggested three possible causes for this based on active and passive components of the sensilla, plus possible muscle attachments. We must now add changes in the cuticle of the tympanum, or possibly its supporting structures. Solitary locusts (8) had larger tympanal movement over a wide frequency range, but stronger neural responses only to high frequencies (15–20 kHz), whereas aged locusts had lower neural responses that were not correlated with tympanal movement (33), so the relationship between tympanal movement and sensory response is not straightforward. Aged Drosophila ears had less mechanical gain and reduced stiffness, which was used to predict a 50% reduction in functioning mechanically activated ion channels (7). However, no changes in the passive mechanical structures were recorded.

Two muscle protein transcripts, troponin and myosin heavy chain, were reduced by noise exposure (Fig. 3, Table 3). Myosin light chain was also reduced but slightly less. Therefore, reduced muscle tension is another candidate for increased tympanal compliance. Although a softer tympanum might be expected to move more easily, a stiffer tympanum might resist flexion between different regions of the cuticle, leading to greater movement at Müller’s organ. Resolution of these issues could be helped by recording from or manipulation of tympanal muscle to determine its contributions to passive and active tympanal movement. A better understanding of the frequency dependent mechanical properties of the complex tympanal structure is also desirable (22).

Metabolic Consequences of Noise Exposure

The most strongly reduced transcripts (Fig. 3) were from genes associated with cellular metabolism (vitellogenins, apolipophorin, gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase, pancreatic lipase-related protein, and hexamerins), as well as enzymes that could support a wide range of cellular processes (carboxylesterase, greglin, GILT-like, and prostatic acid phosphatase). Neurons are active cells, particularly because action potentials consume considerable energy (34). Stimulation with a loud sound for 24 h presumably generated many action potentials in Müller’s organ. Noise exposure also produced metabolic stress in Drosophila auditory neurons (2), including changes in mitochondrial structure.

Turnover of mRNA transcripts is a complex process (35). Transcripts have half-lives ranging from a few minutes to many hours, and numerous mechanisms have been identified that degrade and modify mRNA. Stressed cells are known to reduce general protein synthesis, including aggregation of mRNA into granules targeted for storage or degradation. The duration of noise stimulation here was clearly adequate to initiate or interact with some of these processes. However, it is impossible to tell from the current evidence whether the broad reduction in transcripts supporting cell metabolism reflects feedback processes to protect the tissue from overstimulation, or exhaustion of the cell’s energy production mechanisms. Similarly, we do not yet know if the reduced metabolic capacity caused changes in auditory functions, such as ionic concentrations or muscle contractility.

Sensory Receptor Currents in Müller’s Organ

Previous experiments found normal membrane electrophysiology in noise-exposed sensory neurons, including the action potentials produced by sound or electrical stimulation (3). However, receptor current was significantly reduced. This suggests that sound exposure does not change general ionic concentrations but does affect mechanically activated ion channels or the transepithelial ion and voltage gradients (19) that drive the current. No reduction was seen in any of the transcripts from seven putative mechanically activated ion channels, confirming previous data (3). That leaves reduced transepithelial gradients as a possibility.

Insect epithelial ion transport involves several ion pumps, exchangers, and channels but is incompletely characterized (20). Although we found 32 transcripts of ion transporters and pumps, plus 24 ion channels, the only change caused by noise exposure was the increased abundance of one Na+/H+ exchanger (Fig. 3, Table 2). This sequence matches insect genes identified as exchanger 9B2, possibly of mitochondrial origin. However, all those sequences were predicted by genomic transcriptions, without any functions or tissue location.

The present data support our previous suggestion of reduced transepithelial gradients (3) but indicate that it arises indirectly from a loss of transcripts responsible for general cellular energy production. Reduction in noise-exposed Drosophila auditory receptor potential was also attributed to reduced metabolic capacity (2).

Two additional neural transcripts were reduced by noise exposure. Clavesins are Golgi apparatus proteins involved in vesicular trafficking (36). This may have been reduced by the overall metabolic effect. Timeless (37) is a component of the circadian mechanism but also involved in DNA replication and repair. Noise stimulation for 24 h probably disrupted circadian maintenance of this transcript.

What Drives the Noise-Induced Transcriptional Changes?

Transcription factors (TF) were implicated in an insect model of aged deafness (7), and mammalian TFs rescued insect hearing (38). The lack of TFs in the lists of affected transcripts is surprising. Orthopteran TFs are not well described. A review of insect TFs (39) listed only three in Locusta and two in Schistocerca, compared to 117 in Drosophila. Four TFs were identified as age-related regulators of auditory transduction in Drosophila (7), but no locust transcripts matching these (Table 4) were affected by noise exposure. The most strongly affected TF was SCH_0487 (1.526 noise/control). This putatively encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha, which has many possible functions, including in lyzosymes, so this may be linked to the increase in the lysozyme-like transcript.

Models of Deafness

Age and sound exposure can both cause deafness in mammals and insects, but the underlying mechanisms may be different. Age affects more physiological processes, and probably gene transcripts, than sound alone, making interactions between different systems possible. However, the limited data suggest that both mechanical coupling of sound and transduction of receptor current are usually involved. The recent description of the complete Schistocerca genome (40) promises to allow more structured studies of this interesting model of deafness.

GRANTS

This work is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada Grant RGPIN/03712 to A. S. French and Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship and a Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund Fellowship awarded to B. Warren. B. Warren was also supported by the Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavior at the University of Leicester.

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

A.S.F. and B.W. conceived and designed research; B.W. performed experiments; A.S.F. analyzed data; A.S.F. and B.W. interpreted results of experiments; A.S.F. prepared figures; A.S.F. drafted manuscript; A.S.F. and B.W. edited and revised manuscript; A.S.F. and B.W. approved final version of manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Neil Rimmer and Jake Cranston for locust husbandry.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Salvi R, Boettcher FA. Animal models of noise-induced hearing loss. In: Sourcebook of Models for Biomedical Research, edited by Conn PM. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Christie KW, Sivan-Loukianova E, Smith WC, Aldrich BT, Schon MA, Roy M, Lear BC, Eberl DF. Physiological, anatomical, and behavioral changes after acoustic trauma in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 15449–15454, 2013. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307294110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Warren B, Fenton GE, Klenschi E, Windmill JF, French AS. Physiological basis of noise-induced hearing loss in a tympanal ear. J Neurosci 40: 3130–3140, 2020. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2279-19.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hoy RR, Robert D. Tympanal hearing in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 41: 433–450, 1996. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Markin VS, Hudspeth AJ. Gating-spring models of mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells of the internal ear. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 24: 59–83, 1995. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.24.060195.000423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Albert JT, Nadrowski B, Göpfert MC. Mechanical signatures of transducer gating in the Drosophila ear. Curr Biol 17: 1000–1006, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Keder A, Tardieu C, Malong L, Filia A, Kashkenbayeva A, Newton F, Georgiades M, Gale JE, Lovett M, Jarman AP, Albert JT. Homeostatic maintenance and age-related functional decline in the Drosophila ear. Sci Rep 10: 7431, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64498-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gordon SD, Windmill JF. Hearing ability decreases in ageing locusts. J Exp Biol 218: 1990–1994, 2015. doi: 10.1242/jeb.115113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.French AS, Torkkeli PH. . Sensory receptors and mechanotransduction. In: Cell Physiology Sourcebook, edited by Sperelakis N. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coste B, Xiao B, Santos JS, Syeda R, Grandl J, Spencer KS, Kim SE, Schmidt M, Mathur J, Dubin AE, Montal M, Patapoutian A. Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature 483: 176–181, 2012. doi: 10.1038/nature10812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kernan M, Cowan D, Zuker C. Genetic dissection of mechanosensory transduction:mechanoreception-defective mutations of Drosophila. Neuron 12: 1195–1206, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim J, Chung YD, Park DY, Choi S, Shin DW, Soh H, Lee HW, Son W, Yim J, Park CS, Kernan MJ, Kim C. A TRPV family ion channel required for hearing in Drosophila. Nature 424: 81–84, 2003. doi: 10.1038/nature01733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cueva JG, Mulholland A, Goodman MB. Nanoscale organization of the MEC-4 DEG/ENaC sensory mechanotransduction channel in Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons. J Neurosci 27: 14089–14098, 2007. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4179-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pan B, Geleoc GS, Asai Y, Horwitz GC, Kurima K, Ishikawa K, Kawashima Y, Griffith AJ, Holt JR. TMC1 and TMC2 are components of the mechanotransduction channel in hair cells of the mammalian inner ear. Neuron 79: 504–515, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Field LH, Matheson T. Chordotonal organs of insects. Adv Insect Physiol 27: 1–228, 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60013-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Effertz T, Nadrowski B, Piepenbrock D, Albert JT, Göpfert MC. Direct gating and mechanical integrity of Drosophila auditory transducers require TRPN1. Nat Neurosci 15: 1198–1200, 2012. [Erratum in Nat Neurosci 17: 1840, 2014]. doi: 10.1038/nn.3175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Albert JT, Göpfert MC. Hearing in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol 34: 79–85, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Warren B, Matheson T. The role of the mechanotransduction ion channel candidate Nanchung-Inactive in auditory transduction in an insect ear. J Neurosci 38: 3741–3752, 2018. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2310-17.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thurm U, Wessel G. Metabolism-dependent transepithelial potential differences at epidermal receptors of arthropods. J Comp Physiol A 134: 119–130, 1979. doi: 10.1007/BF00610470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pullikuth AK, Filippov V, Gill SS. Phylogeny and cloning of ion transporters in mosquitoes. J Exp Biol 206: 3857–3868, 2003. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Müller J. Zur Vergleichenden Physiologie Des Gesichtsinnes Des Menschen Und Der Tiere. Leipzig: Knobloch, 1826. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Albrecht FO. The Anatomy of the Migratory Locust. London: University of London, The Athlone Press, 1953. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gray EG. The fine structure of the insect ear. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 243: 75–94, 1960. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1960.0005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices. Proteins 17: 49–61, 1993. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.French AS. Transcriptome walking: a laboratory-oriented GUI-based approach to mRNA identification from deep-sequenced data. BMC Res Notes 5: 673, 2012. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.French AS, Meisner S, Liu H, Weckström M, Torkkeli PH. Transcriptome analysis and RNA interference of cockroach phototransduction indicate three opsins and suggest a major role for TRPL channels. Front Physiol 6: 207, 2015. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang S, Fang Z. Beta approximation of ratio distribution and its application to next generation sequencing read counts. J Appl Stat 44: 57–70, 2017. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1158798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu G, Xuan N, Rajashekar B, Arnaud P, Offmann B, Picimbon JF. Comprehensive history of CSP genes: evolution, phylogenetic distribution and functions. Genes 11: 413, 2020. doi: 10.3390/genes11040413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maleszka J, Forêt S, Saint R, Maleszka R. RNAi-induced phenotypes suggest a novel role for a chemosensory protein CSP5 in the development of embryonic integument in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Dev Genes Evol 217: 189–196, 2007. doi: 10.1007/s00427-006-0127-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rasheed H, Ye C, Meng Y, Ran Y, Li J, Su X. Comparative transcriptomic analysis and endocuticular protein gene expression of alate adults, workers and soldiers of the termite Reticulitermes aculabialis. BMC Genomics 20: 742, 2019. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6149-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhao Y, Liu W, Zhao X, Yu Z, Guo H, Yang Y, Zhang J, Moussian B, Zhang J. Apolipophorin-II/I contributes to cuticular hydrocarbon transport and cuticle barrier construction in Locusta migratoria. Front Physiol 11: 790, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gordon SD, Jackson JC, Rogers SM, Windmill JF. Listening to the environment: hearing differences from an epigenetic effect in solitarious and gregarious locusts. Proc Biol Sci 281: 20141693, 2014. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sengupta B, Stemmler M, Laughlin SB, Niven JE. Action potential energy efficiency varies among neuron types in vertebrates and invertebrates. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000840, 2010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Borbolis F, Syntichaki P. Cytoplasmic mRNA turnover and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 152: 32–42, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Katoh Y, Ritter B, Gaffry T, Blondeau F, Höning S, McPherson PS. The clavesin family, neuron-specific lipid- and clathrin-binding Sec14 proteins regulating lysosomal morphology. J Biol Chem 284: 27646–27654, 2009. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.034884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ousley A, Zafarullah K, Chen Y, Emerson M, Hickman L, Sehgal A. Conserved regions of the timeless (tim) clock gene in Drosophila analyzed through phylogenetic and functional studies. Genetics 148: 815–825, 1998. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.2.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Weinberger S, Topping MP, Yan J, Claeys A, Geest N, Ozbay D, Hassan T, He X, Albert JT, Hassan BA, Ramaekers A. Evolutionary changes in transcription factor coding sequence quantitatively alter sensory organ development and function. eLife 6: e26402, 2017. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Guo Z, Qin J, Zhou X, Zhang Y. Insect transcription factors: a landscape of their structures and biological functions in drosophila and beyond. Int J Mol Sci 19: 3691, 2018. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Verlinden H, Sterck L, Li J, Li Z, Yssel A, Gansemans Y, Verdonck R, Holtof M, Song H, Behmer ST, Sword GA, Matheson T, Ott SR, Deforce D, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Van de Peer Y, Vanden Broeck J. First draft genome assembly of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. F1000Res 9: 775, 2020. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25148.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurophysiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES