
Keywords: auditory neurons, hearing, mechanotransduction, noise-induced hearing loss
Abstract
Locusts have auditory structures called Müller’s organs attached to tympanic membranes on either side of the abdomen. We measured the normalized abundances of 500 different mRNA transcripts in 320 Müller’s organs obtained from 160 locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) that had been subjected to a loud continuous 3-kHz tone for 24 h. Abundance ratios were then measured relative to transcripts from 360 control organs. A histogram of the number of observed transcripts versus their abundance ratios (noise exposed/control) was well fitted by a Cauchy distribution with median value near one. Transcripts below 5% and above 95% of the cumulative distribution function of the fitted Cauchy distribution were selected as putatively different from the expected values of an untreated preparation. This yielded eight transcripts with ratios increased by noise exposure (ratios 1.689–3.038) and 18 transcripts with reduced ratios (0.069–0.457). Most of the transcripts with increased abundance represented genes responsible for cuticular construction, suggesting extensive remodeling of some or all the cuticular components of the auditory structure, whereas the reduced abundance transcripts were mostly involved in lipid and protein storage and metabolism, suggesting a profound reduction in metabolic activity in response to the overstimulation.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY Locust ears have functional and genetic similarities to human ears, including loss of hearing from age or noise exposure. We measured transcript abundances in transcriptomes of noise-exposed and control locust ears. The data indicate remodeling of the ear tympanum and profound reductions in metabolism that may explain reduced sound transduction. These findings advance our understanding of this useful model and suggest further experiments to elucidate mechanisms that ears use to cope with excessive stimulation.
INTRODUCTION
About 1.5 billion people globally have compromised hearing (World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/) due to a range of causes, including genetic defects, infectious diseases, loud noise exposure, and aging. Experimental noise exposure has provided important models of deafness in mammals (1), and this has recently been extended to insect auditory systems (2, 3). Despite obvious differences, insects have evolved organs of hearing that deal with the same problems in converting the small pressure differences of sound into receptor currents in sensory neurons (4). Important similarities with vertebrates are the use of ciliated sensory neurons that use mechanical feedback to amplify small displacements (5, 6) and the presence of many homologous genes in the development and physiology of the hearing structures (7). Insects can provide experimental advantages because of their relatively simple anatomy, ease of breeding, rapid development, and reduced costs. Insects have also provided useful models of aging, including loss of hearing with age (7, 8), with the additional advantage of a short lifespan.
Audition, like all mechanoreception, can be considered as a three-stage process (9). First, the external stimulus (sound) is mechanically coupled to a sensory structure; second, the mechanical signal is transduced to cause an electrical receptor current; third the receptor current is encoded in action potentials for distance transmission. Deafness could involve malfunction at any of the three stages. Changes in mechanical properties and reductions in transduced receptor potentials have been seen in aged (7) and noise-exposed (2, 3) insects, but the causes of these changes remain enigmatic.
A range of ion channel families have been implicated in sensory mechanotransduction, including audition. These comprise Piezo proteins (10), transient receptor potential (TRP) channels (11, 12), degenerin/epithelial sodium channel/acid sensing ion channel (DEG/EnaC/ASIC) families (13), and transmembrane channel-like (TMC) proteins (14). Insect audition is performed by chordotonal organs (15), and three types of TRP channel genes have been linked to chordotonal mechanically activated ion currents: NompC (16), Nanchung, and Inactive (17, 18). However, all the above families must be considered when searching for changes in auditory function.
Many arthropod mechanoreceptors, including chordotonal sensilla, rely on transepithelial gradients of ionic concentrations and voltages to drive the receptor current through mechanically activated ion channels (19). The detailed arrangement of ionic pumps, exchangers, and channels that produce these gradients are not completely understood in any insect tissue (20), but changes in these components could clearly reduce the receptor current and sound detection.
Desert locusts, Schistocerca gregaria, have paired abdominal auditory organs, each consisting of an external tympanum with a sensory structure called Müller’s organ attached internally (21–23). We found previously that 24-h noise exposure produced hearing loss characterized by both mechanical and electrophysiological changes in the locust system (3). Here, we compared the abundances of 500 different mRNA transcripts from Müller’s organs in noise-exposed versus control locusts, in attempts to identify the major molecular changes underway in this model of noise-induced hearing loss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals, Noise Exposure, and Tissue Extraction
Details of the animal handling, noise exposure, and transcriptome creation have been given before (3). Briefly, locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) were reared in the gregarious phase with a 12-h light/dark cycle at 36.25°C, fed on a combination of fresh wheat and bran ad libitum. Male locusts between 10 and 20 d postimaginal molt were used for experiments. Wings were cut off at their base to increase noise exposure to the tympanal ears. Up to 20 locusts at a time were placed in a cylindrical wire mesh cage (8 cm diameter, 11 cm height) directly below a loudspeaker (Visaton FR 10 HM 4 OHM, RS Components) driven by a function generator (Thurlby Thandar Instruments TG550, RS Components) and an audio amplifier (Monacor PA-702, Insight Direct) to produce a 3-kHz tone at 126 dB sound pressure level (SPL), measured at the top of the cage, for 24 h continuously. Control locusts were selected, housed, and treated identically for 24 h, but without activating the 3-kHz tone.
A total of 320 Müller’s organs from 160 noise-exposed locusts (2 ears per locust) were extracted by grasping the Müller’s organ (Fig. 1) through the tympanum with fine forceps and pulling it out. Another 320 Müller’s organs were extracted similarly from control animals. RNA extraction took place less than 4 h from the end of the 24-h noise exposure. Müller’s organs were snap frozen onto a pestle within an Eppendorf tube submerged in liquid nitrogen and RNA extracted and treated with DNase using an RNAqueous kit (AM1931, ThermoFisher). RNA was shipped in dry ice for Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing by Beijing Genomics Institute (Hong Kong). Sample RNA integrity values of 8.7 and 8.4 were given by control and noise-exposed samples, respectively. Both noise-exposed and control groups gave ∼186.1 million paired end reads of 100 nucleotides each.
Figure 1.
Stimulation of locust ears. Noise-exposed locusts (160 animals) were placed in a cylindrical wire mesh cage directly below a loudspeaker producing a 3-kHz tone at 126 dB sound pressure level (SPL) for 24 h continuously. Other conditions were normal (12-h light/dark cycle, 36.25°C). Controls (160 animals) were treated identically, except that the loudspeaker was silent. Locusts’ ears (black circle) comprise tympani on either the side of the abdomen, each innervated internally by a Müller’s organ, being a nerve ganglion containing at least four identifiable groups of scolopidial sensory neurons that proceed distally through the styliform, folded and pyriform structures to form close apposition with the tympanum (22, 23). At least two muscles are connected to the edge of the tympanum, close to an adjacent spiracle (not shown).
Transcript Discovery
Initial cDNA reads were groomed to select those with 80 or more contiguous nucleotides with Phred quality score of >19 to give a final database of ∼100 million pairs of reads each from control and noise-exposed groups. Two approaches were used to select transcripts for assembly. The first method was a targeted search for genes likely to be affected by noise exposure from known physiology. These included mechanically activated ion channels, membrane transporters for ions hypothetically involved in sensory transduction, cytoskeletal proteins, and molecules associated with synaptic transmission. Sequences of interest were identified by searching all possible translations of reads from the control transcriptome versus amino acid sequences of published genes using BLOSUM matching matrices (24). Closely related species were used when possible, but Drosophila melanogaster sequences were also used in some cases. The searches were conducted at relatively low stringency so that many unrelated genes were also found, assembled, and included in the list. Transcripts from this targeted approach included the genes that we described previously (3).
The second method attempted to find individual reads with strongly different abundances in the two transcriptomes. The first 10 million pairs of each transcriptome were searched by counting the number of times that each read was repeated identically. This process was accelerated by removing all copies of each read from the abbreviated transcriptome as it was counted. This continued until all different reads were found in each set. This initial count took ∼3 mo of continuous process by two desktop computers. A second program then searched the two lists of reads for identically matching noise-exposed and control reads in each set and calculated the ratio of the two counts. Finally, matching reads with abundance ratios exceeding 3:1 in either direction were used for assembly, commencing with the highest and lowest ratios, and proceeding until a total of 500 different mRNA identifiable transcripts had been assembled.
Transcript Assembly and Abundance
Identified reads were used to assemble complete transcripts by the transcriptome walking algorithm (25) using an initial minimum overlap of 80 nucleotides. But increased overlap up to 95 was sometimes required to separate transcripts with common motifs or decreases to 60 overlaps for less abundant transcripts. Walking was always continued to identify the complete protein coding sequence, including both START and STOP codons. The walking steps attempted to identify each nucleotide from overlap of 40 reads and then used the highest quality 20 reads of each 40 for assembly. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were recorded where any alternate nucleotide contributed >10% of the reads, but all the reported transcripts represent the canonical sequences.
Only transcripts with complete reading frames that could be putatively identified by the BLAST algorithm (US National Library of Medicine) were accepted into the final collection of 500. In the process, a total of 79 assembled sequences were separately classified as noncoding, partial, or unknown transcripts.
Relative abundances of transcribed mRNA sequences in the two tissues were estimated by searching both complete groomed transcriptome libraries for reads matching the reading frame of each transcript, using the criterion of at least 90/100 identical nucleotide matches to score each read as derived from that transcript. Matching reads as a fraction of total reads counted were then normalized by reading frame length and expressed as abundance relative to the 40S ribosomal protein SA abundance in each transcriptome. This method has previously been found to agree closely with relative abundances estimated by quantitative PCR (26).
Fitting Relative Abundance Data
Abundance ratio values (Noise exposed/Control) were counted into histogram bins of 0.2 width (Fig. 2). The complete histogram was fitted by the Cauchy distribution (27):
| (1) |
where x is abundance ratio, x0 is the location parameter, γ is the half width at half maximum, and A is the value of f(x) at x = x0. Fitting was performed using a minimum squared error method. Confidence intervals were obtained from the normalized cumulative distribution function, F(x), at the desired values by successive approximation, using the fitted values of x0 and γ:
| (2) |
Figure 2.
Distribution of ratios of abundances of mRNA transcripts from Müller’s organs of control and noise-exposed locusts. Ratio values were counted into histogram bins of 0.2 width. The continuous line shows the best fitting Cauchy distribution (Eq. 1) with parameters x0 = 1.007, γ = 0.865. Dashed vertical lines indicate the 5% and 95% values of the normalized cumulative distribution (Eq. 2) using the same fitted parameters. Values below and above unity correspond to transcripts with reduced and increased abundance in noise-exposed animals, respectively. x0, location parameter; γ, half width at half maximum.
All transcript discovery, assembly, abundance estimation, data processing, and fitting was performed by custom written software using the C++ language and desktop computers.
RESULTS
A total of 500 mRNA transcripts were assembled to include the complete amino acid reading frame, and in many cases the complete 5′ and 3′ end sequences. Identification codes, abundances in the control and noise-exposed transcriptomes, and putative functions of all transcripts are given in Table 1. Full nucleotide sequences, reading frames, translations, and single nucleotide polymorphisms for all transcripts are available at http://asf-pht.medicine.dal.ca/SCH_Web/. Reading frames ranged from 159 to 15,450 nucleotides (53–5,150 amino acids) with average length 1,927 nucleotides. Based on hypotheses from previous studies (3, 7), we noted that the list of transcripts included seven mechanically activated ion channels, 32 transmembrane transporters or pumps, 24 voltage- or ligand-activated ion channels, and 66 transcription or translation factors.
Table 1.
Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts and abundances for control and noise-exposed animals
| ID Code | GenBank | Control | Noise | Putative Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCH_0001 | MW962393 | −2.432 | −2.253 | Actin 1 |
| SCH_0002 | MK962884 | −2.298 | −2.272 | TRPV cation channel Inactive |
| SCH_0003 | MW962394 | −0.374 | −0.347 | GAPDH |
| SCH_0004 | MW962395 | 0.583 | 0.635 | Actin 2 |
| SCH_0005 | MW962396 | −2.804 | −2.849 | Adenylate cyclase type 2 |
| SCH_0006 | MW962397 | −1.441 | −1.643 | Actin 3 |
| SCH_0007 | MW962398 | −3.451 | −3.396 | Ankyrin repeat and death containing protein |
| SCH_0008 | MW962399 | −2.916 | −2.959 | TRPN cation channel NompC |
| SCH_0009 | MW962400 | −2.739 | −2.785 | Ankyrin repeat containing 27-like |
| SCH_0010 | MW962401 | −1.700 | −1.781 | Ankyrin repeat containing 54-like |
| SCH_0011 | MW962402 | −2.242 | −2.259 | Mariner Mos1 transpoase |
| SCH_0012 | MW962403 | −3.100 | −3.161 | Distal antennal-like |
| SCH_0013 | MW962404 | −1.673 | −1.650 | Basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein |
| SCH_0014 | MW962405 | −1.893 | −1.883 | NDUFAF4 |
| SCH_0015 | MW962406 | −0.369 | −0.877 | Apolipophorin precursor |
| SCH_0016 | MK962885 | −2.172 | −2.135 | TRPV cation channel Nanchung |
| SCH_0017 | MK962886 | −2.258 | −2.232 | Piezo |
| SCH_0018 | MW962407 | −1.719 | −1.717 | Synaptophysin |
| SCH_0019 | MW962408 | −1.616 | −1.588 | Synaptotagmin |
| SCH_0020 | MW962409 | −1.169 | −1.186 | Synaptosomal-Associated Protein SNAP 25 |
| SCH_0021 | MW962410 | −1.949 | −1.981 | Transmembrane channel TMC 7 |
| SCH_0022 | MW962411 | −0.525 | −0.487 | Na/K ATPase |
| SCH_0023 | MW962412 | −2.086 | −2.202 | Solute carrier family 12 |
| SCH_0024 | MW962413 | −1.964 | −1.857 | Bumetanide-sensitive K/Na/Cl transporter |
| SCH_0025 | MW962414 | −1.971 | −2.015 | Bumetanide-sensitive K/Na/Cl transporter |
| SCH_0026 | MW962415 | −2.400 | −2.543 | Na/H Exchanger |
| SCH_0027 | MW962416 | −3.193 | −3.057 | Na/H Exchanger |
| SCH_0028 | MW962417 | −1.697 | −1.736 | Ca-transporting ATPase |
| SCH_0029 | MW962418 | −3.319 | −3.064 | Na/H Exchanger |
| SCH_0030 | MW962419 | −2.423 | −2.442 | K channel Shaker |
| SCH_0031 | MW962420 | −1.965 | −1.985 | G-protein activated IR K channel |
| SCH_0032 | MW962421 | 0.150 | 0.243 | Tubulin alpha |
| SCH_0033 | MW962422 | 0.194 | 0.236 | Tubulin alpha |
| SCH_0034 | MW962423 | −0.143 | −0.127 | Tubulin alpha |
| SCH_0035 | MW962424 | −1.066 | −1.081 | Spectrin alpha chain |
| SCH_0036 | MW962425 | −2.797 | −2.911 | EAG K channel |
| SCH_0037 | MW962426 | −1.675 | −1.654 | MAP kinase-activated protein kinase |
| SCH_0038 | MW962427 | −1.748 | −1.840 | CaM kinase II |
| SCH_0039 | MW962428 | −1.588 | −1.665 | Protein kinase DC2 |
| SCH_0040 | MW962429 | −2.095 | −2.168 | DENN domain containing protein |
| SCH_0041 | MW962430 | −1.714 | −1.809 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0042 | MW962431 | −0.585 | −0.472 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0043 | MW962432 | −0.270 | −0.185 | Aquaporin |
| SCH_0044 | MW962433 | −0.973 | −2.136 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0045 | MW962434 | −1.152 | −1.093 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0046 | MW962435 | −0.330 | −0.200 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0047 | MW962436 | −0.756 | −0.680 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0048 | MW962437 | −1.345 | −1.282 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0049 | MW962438 | −1.279 | −1.375 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0050 | MW962439 | −2.129 | −2.077 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0051 | MW962440 | −1.214 | −1.101 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0052 | MW962441 | −2.081 | −2.116 | Acetylcholine esterase |
| SCH_0053 | MW962442 | −1.773 | −1.798 | Serine-threonine protein phosphatase II |
| SCH_0054 | MW962443 | −1.726 | −1.754 | Serine-threonine protein phosphatase II |
| SCH_0055 | MW962444 | −1.974 | −2.065 | Beta-arrestin 1 |
| SCH_0056 | MW962445 | −1.717 | −1.623 | 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase |
| SCH_0057 | MW962446 | −2.408 | −2.441 | 5-AMP-activated protein kinase catalytic subunit α2 |
| SCH_0058 | MW962447 | −2.200 | −2.247 | Calcium/calmodulin-responsive adenylate cyclase |
| SCH_0059 | MW962448 | −2.440 | −2.482 | Adenylate cyclase type 9 |
| SCH_0060 | MW962449 | −2.892 | −2.892 | Adenylate cyclase type 8 |
| SCH_0061 | MW962450 | −1.786 | −1.794 | Ankyrin 3 |
| SCH_0062 | MW962451 | −2.146 | −2.175 | Ankyrin 3 |
| SCH_0063 | MW962452 | −1.272 | −1.262 | Argonaute 2 |
| SCH_0064 | MW962453 | −2.462 | −2.519 | Argonaute 2 |
| SCH_0065 | MW962454 | −2.484 | −2.627 | Argonaute 1 |
| SCH_0066 | MW962455 | −2.708 | −2.664 | G protein-activated IR K channel |
| SCH_0067 | MW962456 | −1.809 | −1.901 | Spectrin beta chain |
| SCH_0068 | MW962457 | −2.955 | −2.871 | Ca-activated K channel slowpoke |
| SCH_0069 | MW962458 | −0.597 | −0.586 | ATP-dependent RNA helicase |
| SCH_0070 | MW962459 | −0.583 | −0.584 | ATP-dependent RNA helicase |
| SCH_0071 | MW962460 | −0.372 | −0.425 | ATP-dependent RNA helicase |
| SCH_0072 | MW962461 | −0.901 | −0.911 | Basigin |
| SCH_0073 | MW962462 | −0.737 | −0.859 | C-type lysozyme |
| SCH_0074 | MW962463 | −0.356 | −0.306 | Calmodulin |
| SCH_0075 | MW962464 | −0.626 | −0.606 | Calmodulin |
| SCH_0076 | MW962465 | −1.237 | −1.262 | Calpain |
| SCH_0077 | MW962466 | −0.435 | −0.423 | Calreticulin |
| SCH_0078 | MW962467 | −2.047 | −2.085 | Voltage-activated Na channel alpha subunit |
| SCH_0079 | MW962468 | −2.117 | −2.062 | Voltage-activated Cl channel CLC type |
| SCH_0080 | MW962469 | −1.551 | −1.534 | HCN channel |
| SCH_0081 | MW962470 | −1.344 | −1.407 | K channel subfamily K member |
| SCH_0082 | MW962471 | −1.622 | −1.600 | cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit |
| SCH_0083 | MW962472 | −1.398 | −1.438 | cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II regulatory subunit |
| SCH_0084 | MW962473 | −1.650 | −1.611 | Cryptochrome 2 |
| SCH_0085 | MW962474 | −2.302 | −2.306 | Cryptochrome 2 |
| SCH_0086 | MW962475 | −1.274 | −1.271 | CRAC Calcium release-activated calcium channel |
| SCH_0087 | MW962476 | −2.151 | −2.155 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 |
| SCH_0088 | MW962477 | −2.006 | −1.982 | Diacylglycerol kinase epsilon |
| SCH_0089 | MW962478 | −1.788 | −1.781 | Diacylglycerol kinase theta |
| SCH_0090 | MW962479 | −2.007 | −1.969 | Protein kinase CP |
| SCH_0091 | MW962480 | −2.304 | −2.345 | Dicer 1 |
| SCH_0092 | MW962481 | −0.204 | 0.085 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2 |
| SCH_0093 | MW962482 | −1.611 | −1.661 | Epidermal growth factor receptor |
| SCH_0094 | MW962483 | −2.856 | −2.774 | Glycine receptor alpha subunit |
| SCH_0095 | MW962484 | −0.706 | −0.581 | Phe-4-monooxygenase (Henna) |
| SCH_0096 | MW962485 | −2.269 | −2.281 | Huntingtin |
| SCH_0097 | MW962486 | −2.111 | −2.169 | IP3 receptor |
| SCH_0098 | MW962487 | −2.465 | −2.557 | Peripheral plasma membrane protein CASK |
| SCH_0099 | MW962488 | −1.929 | −1.939 | E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase parkin |
| SCH_0100 | MW962489 | −1.711 | −1.705 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase Tricorner |
| SCH_0101 | MW962490 | −2.165 | −2.172 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase Warts |
| SCH_0102 | MW962491 | −2.215 | −2.301 | Ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta |
| SCH_0103 | MW962492 | −1.726 | −1.672 | 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase |
| SCH_0104 | MW962493 | −2.449 | −2.571 | 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase |
| SCH_0105 | MW962494 | −1.142 | −1.131 | Na/H exchange regulatory cofactor |
| SCH_0106 | MZ004840 | −0.053 | −0.012 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0107 | MW962495 | −2.124 | −2.149 | Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3- phosphatase |
| SCH_0108 | MW962496 | −0.122 | −0.087 | 14-3-3 protein zeta |
| SCH_0109 | MW962497 | −0.682 | −0.656 | 14-3-3 protein epsilon |
| SCH_0110 | MW962498 | −1.890 | −1.963 | 5-oxoprolinase |
| SCH_0111 | MW962499 | −1.308 | −1.327 | Cation/H exchanger NHE |
| SCH_0112 | MW962500 | −1.544 | −1.508 | V-type proton ATPase subunit H |
| SCH_0113 | MW962501 | −1.189 | −1.146 | V-type proton ATPase subunit B |
| SCH_0114 | MW962502 | −1.145 | −1.136 | V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit A |
| SCH_0115 | MW962503 | −1.152 | −1.143 | V-type proton ATPase subunit D |
| SCH_0116 | MW962504 | −0.864 | −0.828 | V-type proton ATPase subunit E |
| SCH_0117 | MW962505 | −1.747 | −1.744 | Calcium permeable stress-gated cation channel |
| SCH_0118 | MW962506 | −0.376 | −0.268 | Annexin B9 |
| SCH_0119 | MW962507 | −0.902 | −0.900 | Annexin B9 |
| SCH_0120 | MW962508 | −1.512 | −1.494 | Annulin |
| SCH_0121 | MW962509 | −1.336 | −1.458 | Hemocyte protein-glutamine γ-glutamyltransferase |
| SCH_0122 | MW962510 | −1.718 | −1.683 | Anoctamin (Ca-activated Cl channel) |
| SCH_0123 | MW962511 | −2.312 | −2.347 | Anoctamin (Ca-activated Cl channel) |
| SCH_0124 | MW962512 | −1.196 | −1.103 | Carbonic anhydrase |
| SCH_0125 | MW962513 | −0.865 | −1.010 | Carbonic anhydrase |
| SCH_0126 | MW962514 | −1.681 | −1.774 | Carbonic anhydrase |
| SCH_0127 | MW962515 | −0.234 | −0.242 | Eukaryotic initiation factor 4 A-II |
| SCH_0128 | MW962516 | −1.192 | −1.420 | Attractin-like |
| SCH_0129 | MW962517 | −2.724 | −2.957 | Attractin-like |
| SCH_0130 | MW962518 | −1.304 | −1.205 | Collagen alpha chain |
| SCH_0131 | MW962519 | −1.874 | −1.829 | Collagen alpha chain |
| SCH_0132 | MW962520 | −1.455 | −1.373 | Collagen apha chain |
| SCH_0133 | MW962521 | −1.931 | −1.918 | Chromatin-remodeling ATPase INO80 |
| SCH_0134 | MW962522 | −2.197 | −2.237 | Helicase domino |
| SCH_0135 | MW962523 | −2.073 | −2.016 | Helicase-like |
| SCH_0136 | MW962524 | −2.231 | −2.111 | Eyes absent |
| SCH_0137 | MW962525 | −2.114 | −2.312 | Ecdysone receptor |
| SCH_0138 | MW962526 | −1.723 | −1.872 | Retinoid-X receptor |
| SCH_0139 | MW962527 | −2.500 | −2.640 | Embryonic gonad like |
| SCH_0140 | MW962528 | −2.690 | −2.667 | Nuclear hormone receptor |
| SCH_0141 | MW962529 | −2.745 | −2.742 | Nuclear hormone receptor |
| SCH_0142 | MW962530 | −2.109 | −2.061 | Early growth response protein |
| SCH_0143 | MW962531 | −3.147 | −3.133 | Tyramine receptor |
| SCH_0144 | MW962532 | 0.141 | 0.332 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 4 |
| SCH_0145 | MW962533 | −1.460 | −1.232 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 3 |
| SCH_0146 | MW962534 | −2.996 | −3.032 | Na/Ca exchanger |
| SCH_0147 | MW962535 | −2.210 | −2.238 | Na/H Exchanger |
| SCH_0148 | MW962536 | −2.184 | −2.207 | GABA A receptor beta subunit |
| SCH_0149 | MW962537 | −1.654 | −1.560 | Glutamate-gated chloride channel |
| SCH_0150 | MW962538 | −2.410 | −2.447 | Glutamate-gated chloride channel |
| SCH_0151 | MW962539 | −2.684 | −2.754 | GABA B receptor subunit 1 |
| SCH_0152 | MW962540 | −2.554 | −2.545 | Choline acetyltransferase |
| SCH_0153 | MW962541 | −3.304 | −3.440 | GABA B receptor subunit 2 |
| SCH_0154 | MW962542 | −2.235 | −2.238 | Sodium bicarbonate cotransporter |
| SCH_0155 | MW962543 | −1.437 | −1.524 | Band 3 anion transporter |
| SCH_0156 | MW962544 | −1.118 | −1.194 | Dystonin |
| SCH_0157 | MW962545 | −1.277 | −1.265 | Microtubule-associated protein |
| SCH_0158 | MW962546 | −1.387 | −1.379 | Microtubule-associated serine-threonine kinase |
| SCH_0159 | MW962547 | −2.178 | −2.221 | Microtubule-associated serine-threonine kinase |
| SCH_0160 | MW962548 | −2.142 | −2.154 | Serine-threonine kinase sgk-like |
| SCH_0161 | MW962549 | −1.573 | −1.527 | Serine-threonine kinase grp |
| SCH_0162 | MW962550 | −1.913 | −1.881 | Tubulin gamma |
| SCH_0163 | MW962551 | −1.890 | −2.230 | Myosin heavy chain |
| SCH_0164 | MW962552 | −1.899 | −2.155 | Myosin light chain |
| SCH_0165 | MW962553 | −1.991 | −2.015 | TRPML3 (mucolipin 3) |
| SCH_0166 | MW962554 | −3.189 | −3.174 | Pickpocket (ENaC, ASIC family) |
| SCH_0167 | MW962555 | −2.869 | −2.891 | Glutamate-gated chloride channel |
| SCH_0168 | MW962556 | −2.171 | −2.285 | Transcriptional repressor Scratch |
| SCH_0169 | MW962557 | −2.176 | −2.182 | Zinc finger protein 432-like |
| SCH_0170 | MW962558 | −2.308 | −2.339 | Locust corazonin-related transcriptional factor |
| SCH_0171 | MW962559 | −1.963 | −1.960 | Zinc finger protein 271-like |
| SCH_0172 | MW962560 | −1.629 | −1.602 | Zinc finger protein 271-like |
| SCH_0173 | MW962561 | −2.338 | −2.367 | Zinc finger protein 236-like |
| SCH_0174 | MW962562 | −2.115 | −2.107 | Zinc finger protein 62-like |
| SCH_0175 | MW962563 | −2.560 | −2.489 | Zinc finger protein 341-like |
| SCH_0176 | MW962564 | −2.368 | −2.308 | Zinc finger protein 271-like |
| SCH_0177 | MW962565 | −2.430 | −2.368 | Zinc finger protein 813-like |
| SCH_0178 | MW962566 | −2.251 | −2.220 | Zinc finger protein 32-like |
| SCH_0179 | MW962567 | −2.218 | −2.218 | Zinc finger protein 135-like |
| SCH_0180 | MW962568 | −2.333 | −2.358 | Zinc finger protein 569-like |
| SCH_0181 | MW962569 | −1.986 | −2.012 | Zinc finger protein 2-like |
| SCH_0182 | MW962570 | −1.899 | −1.917 | Dicer 2 |
| SCH_0183 | MW962571 | −1.449 | −1.455 | Eukaryotic initiation factor 3 A |
| SCH_0184 | MW962572 | 0.378 | 0.378 | Elongation factor 1 alpha |
| SCH_0185 | MW962573 | −1.107 | −1.079 | Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 subunit 1 |
| SCH_0186 | MW962574 | −2.109 | −2.095 | DSCAM 2 |
| SCH_0187 | MW962575 | −2.137 | −2.150 | Dynamin |
| SCH_0188 | MW962576 | −2.143 | −2.154 | Dynamin |
| SCH_0189 | MW962577 | −1.793 | −1.791 | Dynamin |
| SCH_0190 | MW962578 | −2.027 | −2.053 | Enhancer of sevenless 2B |
| SCH_0191 | MW962579 | −1.190 | −1.188 | Lamin Dm0 |
| SCH_0192 | MW962580 | −1.867 | −1.853 | E3 ubuquitin-protein kinase RNF123 |
| SCH_0193 | MW962581 | −0.711 | −0.670 | Voltage-dependent anion channel |
| SCH_0194 | MW962582 | −1.677 | −1.673 | L-type calcium channel beta subunit |
| SCH_0195 | MW962583 | −1.863 | −1.868 | L-type calcium channel beta subunit |
| SCH_0196 | MW962584 | −0.654 | −0.602 | Chitin deacetylase |
| SCH_0197 | MW962585 | −0.490 | −0.349 | Chitin deacetylase |
| SCH_0198 | MW962586 | −1.079 | −0.987 | Chitin deacetylase |
| SCH_0199 | MW962587 | −1.911 | −2.319 | Troponin |
| SCH_0200 | MW962588 | −1.456 | −1.505 | Alpha actinin |
| SCH_0201 | MW962589 | −1.197 | −1.200 | Spectrin beta chain |
| SCH_0202 | MW962590 | −1.471 | −1.460 | Lola - longitdinals lacking |
| SCH_0203 | MW962591 | −1.459 | −1.483 | Bric-a-brac-like |
| SCH_0204 | MW962592 | −1.147 | −1.162 | BTG 2 |
| SCH_0205 | MW962593 | −1.572 | −1.593 | BTG 3 |
| SCH_0206 | MW962594 | −1.518 | −1.547 | Calcium-transporting ATPase |
| SCH_0207 | MW962595 | −2.647 | −2.688 | Neural cadherin |
| SCH_0208 | MW962596 | 0.719 | −0.424 | Vitellogenin A |
| SCH_0209 | MW962597 | −0.872 | −0.875 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-17 kDA |
| SCH_0210 | MZ004841 | 0.864 | 0.877 | Cytochrome B (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0211 | MW962598 | −0.836 | −0.816 | Ras-related protein Rab 1 A |
| SCH_0212 | MZ004842 | 1.323 | 1.341 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0213 | MW962599 | 0.352 | 0.358 | ATP-ADP translocator |
| SCH_0214 | MW962600 | −0.304 | −0.229 | Arginine kinase |
| SCH_0215 | MW962601 | 0.622 | 0.194 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0216 | MW962602 | −0.150 | −0.129 | 40S ribosomal protein S4 |
| SCH_0217 | MW962603 | −0.166 | −0.198 | Polyubiquitin |
| SCH_0218 | MW962604 | −0.457 | −0.357 | Heat shock protein 90 |
| SCH_0219 | MW962605 | 0.235 | 0.062 | Imaginal disc growth factor |
| SCH_0220 | MW962606 | 0.348 | 0.355 | Tubulin beta |
| SCH_0221 | MW962607 | −0.478 | −0.535 | Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] |
| SCH_0222 | MW962608 | −1.530 | −1.607 | Lacunin |
| SCH_0223 | MZ004843 | 0.999 | 1.009 | ATP synthase F0 subunit 6 (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0224 | MZ004844 | 0.919 | 0.941 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0225 | MW962609 | 0.376 | 0.360 | Icarapin-like |
| SCH_0226 | MZ004845 | 0.976 | 1.002 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0227 | MW962610 | 0.687 | −0.458 | Vitellogenin B |
| SCH_0228 | MW962611 | 0.437 | −0.580 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0229 | MW962612 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 40S ribosomal protein SA |
| SCH_0230 | MW962613 | −0.979 | −0.972 | Sortilin-related receptor |
| SCH_0231 | MW962614 | −0.782 | −0.597 | Pacifastin-related peptide precursor |
| SCH_0232 | MW962615 | −0.120 | −0.019 | Transferrin |
| SCH_0233 | MW962616 | 0.317 | −0.216 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0234 | MW962617 | −0.348 | −0.268 | Thioredoxin 2-like |
| SCH_0235 | MW962618 | 0.514 | 0.557 | Heat shock protein 70 |
| SCH_0236 | MW962619 | −0.394 | −0.427 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5 |
| SCH_0237 | MW962620 | −0.206 | −0.181 | 60S ribosomal protein L19 |
| SCH_0238 | MW962621 | −1.711 | −1.663 | Solute carrier family 25 member 44 |
| SCH_0239 | MW962622 | −0.346 | −0.333 | ATP synthase subunit alpha (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0240 | MW962623 | −0.774 | −0.723 | NDRG3 |
| SCH_0241 | MW962624 | 0.100 | 0.123 | Activating transcription factor of chaperone |
| SCH_0242 | MW962625 | −0.606 | −0.618 | Ly 6 neurotoxin |
| SCH_0243 | MW962626 | −2.951 | −3.012 | Glutamate receptor, ionotropic |
| SCH_0244 | MW962627 | 0.081 | 0.039 | Ferritin heavy subunit |
| SCH_0245 | MW962628 | −0.720 | −0.969 | Facilitated trehalose transporter |
| SCH_0246 | MW962629 | −0.910 | −0.834 | Innexin 2 |
| SCH_0247 | MW962630 | −0.087 | −0.440 | Gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase |
| SCH_0248 | MW962631 | −0.376 | −0.355 | Ly 6 neurotoxin |
| SCH_0249 | MW962632 | 0.045 | 0.137 | Tubulin beta |
| SCH_0250 | MW962633 | −0.215 | −0.162 | Midline fasciclin |
| SCH_0251 | MW962634 | −1.321 | −1.316 | GTP-binding protein sar1 |
| SCH_0252 | MW962635 | −0.492 | −0.544 | Legumain |
| SCH_0253 | MW962636 | −1.576 | −1.597 | Membrane-associated protein sar1 |
| SCH_0254 | MW962637 | −1.933 | −1.906 | Exocyst complex component 5 |
| SCH_0255 | MW962638 | −1.983 | −2.577 | GILT-like |
| SCH_0256 | MW962639 | −1.744 | −1.850 | Fibrillin 2 |
| SCH_0257 | MW962640 | −1.395 | −1.402 | CLCN3 H/Cl exchange transporter 3 |
| SCH_0258 | MW962641 | −1.209 | −1.182 | DNA topoisomerase (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0259 | MW962642 | −1.448 | −1.420 | Farnesol dehydrogenase |
| SCH_0260 | MW962643 | −1.704 | −1.750 | CLUH Clustered mitochondrial protein homolog |
| SCH_0261 | MW962644 | −1.292 | −1.282 | Alpha-2-macroglobulin receptor-associated protein |
| SCH_0262 | MW962645 | −0.618 | −0.638 | Integral membrane protein 2 C |
| SCH_0263 | MW962646 | −1.654 | −1.651 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] γ-subunit (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0264 | MW962647 | −0.967 | −0.959 | Phosphoglycerate mutase 2 |
| SCH_0265 | MW962648 | 0.215 | 0.214 | Translationally-controlled tumor protein |
| SCH_0266 | MW962649 | −0.651 | −0.678 | ADP-ribosylation factor 1 |
| SCH_0267 | MW962650 | −1.525 | −1.548 | Solute carrier family 22 |
| SCH_0268 | MW962651 | −0.026 | 0.039 | Defense protein |
| SCH_0269 | MW962652 | −1.389 | −1.407 | Integrin |
| SCH_0270 | MW962653 | −0.951 | −1.005 | Nose resistant to fluoxetine protein 6 |
| SCH_0271 | MW962654 | −1.514 | −1.491 | GTP-binding protein 128up |
| SCH_0272 | MW962655 | −0.921 | −0.912 | Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0273 | MW962656 | −0.320 | −0.196 | Spermine synthase |
| SCH_0274 | MW962657 | −1.188 | −1.163 | Carbohydrate sulfotransferase 11 |
| SCH_0275 | MW962658 | −2.080 | −2.060 | Uridine-cytidine kinase-like 1 |
| SCH_0276 | MW962659 | −0.435 | −0.437 | Protein krasavietz |
| SCH_0277 | MW962660 | −0.114 | −0.394 | Nuclear protein 1 |
| SCH_0278 | MW962661 | 0.074 | 0.085 | Elongation factor 2 |
| SCH_0279 | MW962662 | −0.610 | −0.765 | Peroxiredoxin 6 |
| SCH_0280 | MW962663 | 0.039 | 0.074 | Chemosensory protein precursor |
| SCH_0281 | MW962664 | −0.063 | −0.102 | Polyadenylate-binding protein 1 |
| SCH_0282 | MW962665 | −0.712 | −0.699 | Poly(U)-specific endoribonuclease |
| SCH_0283 | MW962666 | −1.029 | −0.957 | Sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 1-A |
| SCH_0284 | MW962667 | −1.285 | −1.252 | N-acetyltransferase san |
| SCH_0285 | MW962668 | −1.266 | −1.287 | ABC transporter G family member 23 |
| SCH_0286 | MW962669 | −1.983 | −1.994 | Tetratricopeptide Repeat TANC2 |
| SCH_0287 | MW962670 | −1.538 | −1.602 | Transmembrane protein 53 |
| SCH_0288 | MW962671 | −1.027 | −1.397 | Pancreatic lipase-related protein 2 |
| SCH_0289 | MW962672 | −1.188 | −1.204 | Singed |
| SCH_0290 | MW962673 | 0.212 | −0.104 | Apolipophorin III |
| SCH_0291 | MW962674 | −1.744 | −1.810 | Myelin regulatory factor |
| SCH_0292 | MW962675 | −0.862 | −0.841 | CHCHD10 (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0293 | MW962676 | −0.574 | −0.502 | Dynein light chain A |
| SCH_0294 | MW962677 | −1.476 | −1.491 | Transcription factor CP2 |
| SCH_0295 | MW962678 | −0.435 | −0.438 | Profilin |
| SCH_0296 | MW962679 | −1.549 | −1.537 | Nicastrin |
| SCH_0297 | MW962680 | −0.390 | −0.415 | Inhibitor of apoptosis |
| SCH_0298 | MW962681 | −0.612 | −0.573 | Leupaxin |
| SCH_0299 | MW962682 | −0.687 | −0.669 | Transcription factor BTF3 |
| SCH_0300 | MW962683 | −1.268 | −1.325 | Atlastin |
| SCH_0301 | MW962684 | −0.873 | −0.877 | Beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase |
| SCH_0302 | MW962685 | −0.311 | −0.219 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 5 |
| SCH_0303 | MW962686 | −0.030 | −0.073 | Ferritin subunit |
| SCH_0304 | MW962687 | −1.159 | −1.139 | Actin-binding LIM protein 3 |
| SCH_0305 | MW962688 | −0.240 | −0.288 | Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase |
| SCH_0306 | MZ004846 | −0.114 | −0.283 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0307 | MW962689 | −0.289 | −0.255 | 40S ribosomal protein S24 |
| SCH_0308 | MW962690 | −0.232 | −0.057 | Chemosensory protein CSP-sg4 |
| SCH_0309 | MW962691 | −0.850 | −0.864 | Double-stranded RNA-binding protein Staufen |
| SCH_0310 | MW962692 | −0.246 | −0.197 | Myophilin |
| SCH_0311 | MW962693 | −0.246 | −0.242 | ATP-synthase subunit beta |
| SCH_0312 | MW962694 | −2.208 | −2.197 | Aminopeptidase N |
| SCH_0313 | MW962695 | −1.770 | −1.750 | Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 1 |
| SCH_0314 | MW962696 | −1.938 | −1.892 | Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 9 |
| SCH_0315 | MW962697 | −1.831 | −1.853 | Tyrosine-protein phosphatase Lar |
| SCH_0316 | MW962698 | −2.161 | −2.187 | Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 4 |
| SCH_0317 | MW962699 | −1.932 | −1.938 | Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 69 D |
| SCH_0318 | MW962700 | −1.871 | −1.847 | Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 99 A |
| SCH_0319 | MW962701 | −1.970 | −2.238 | Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 5-like |
| SCH_0320 | MW962702 | −1.762 | −1.729 | Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase N2 |
| SCH_0321 | MW962703 | −2.517 | −2.642 | Tyrosine−protein phosphatase non-receptor type 14 |
| SCH_0322 | MW962704 | −1.642 | −1.652 | Presenilin |
| SCH_0323 | MW962705 | −1.443 | −1.444 | Zinc finger protein 330 homolog |
| SCH_0324 | MW962706 | −0.788 | −0.306 | Chemosensory protein precursor |
| SCH_0325 | MW962707 | −0.240 | −0.224 | 60S ribosomal protein L36 |
| SCH_0326 | MW962708 | −0.400 | −0.366 | 60S ribosomal protein L18a |
| SCH_0327 | MW962709 | −0.879 | −0.739 | Serpin |
| SCH_0328 | MW962710 | −0.733 | −0.764 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 2 |
| SCH_0329 | MW962711 | −1.852 | −1.812 | Mitochondrial intermediate peptidase |
| SCH_0330 | MW962712 | −1.207 | −1.176 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit D |
| SCH_0331 | MW962713 | −1.397 | −1.616 | Cystathionine beta-synthase |
| SCH_0332 | MW962714 | −0.140 | −0.796 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0333 | MW962715 | −1.296 | −1.313 | rap1 GTPase-activating protein 1 |
| SCH_0334 | MW962716 | −2.852 | −2.910 | Glutamate receptor, ionotropic |
| SCH_0335 | MW962717 | −2.721 | −2.817 | Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, beta subunit |
| SCH_0336 | MW962718 | −2.336 | −2.349 | Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, alpha subunit |
| SCH_0337 | MW962719 | −1.228 | −1.301 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase |
| SCH_0338 | MW962720 | −1.435 | −1.439 | Coatomer subunit delta |
| SCH_0339 | MW962721 | −0.576 | −0.543 | Histone H3 |
| SCH_0340 | MW962722 | −1.256 | −1.226 | Proton-coupled amino acid transporter-like |
| SCH_0341 | MW962723 | −0.912 | −0.921 | Ras-related protein rab7 |
| SCH_0342 | MW962724 | −1.463 | −1.462 | Programmed cell death protein 10 |
| SCH_0343 | MW962725 | −1.666 | −1.639 | Adenosylhomocysteinase |
| SCH_0344 | MW962726 | −0.992 | −1.033 | ATP-citrate synthase |
| SCH_0345 | MW962727 | −1.307 | −1.279 | Armadillo |
| SCH_0346 | MW962728 | −1.591 | −1.579 | Enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase |
| SCH_0347 | MW962729 | −0.936 | −1.049 | Vigilin |
| SCH_0348 | MW962730 | −0.487 | −0.495 | Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase |
| SCH_0349 | MZ004847 | 0.020 | 0.050 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (mitochondrial) |
| SCH_0350 | MW962731 | −0.796 | −0.316 | Chemosensory protein |
| SCH_0351 | MW962732 | −0.639 | −0.661 | DnaJ subfamily A member 2 |
| SCH_0352 | MW962733 | −1.034 | −1.052 | Angiotensin-converting enzyme |
| SCH_0353 | MW962734 | −0.760 | −0.735 | Myosin regulatory light chain sqh |
| SCH_0354 | MW962735 | −0.920 | −0.855 | Succinate dehydrogenase |
| SCH_0355 | MW962736 | −1.413 | −1.372 | Glucose-induced degradation protein 8 |
| SCH_0356 | MW962737 | −0.965 | −0.984 | Nascent polypeptide-associated complex α-subunit |
| SCH_0357 | MW962738 | −0.898 | −0.899 | Splicing factor U2AF 50 kDa subunit |
| SCH_0358 | MW962739 | −1.581 | −1.445 | Proton-coupled amino acid transporter-like CG1139 |
| SCH_0359 | MW962740 | −0.240 | −0.212 | 40S ribosomal protein S10-like |
| SCH_0360 | MW962741 | −0.341 | −0.349 | Prosaposin |
| SCH_0361 | MW962742 | −0.652 | −0.709 | Cathepsin B |
| SCH_0362 | MW962743 | −0.201 | −0.865 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0363 | MW962744 | −1.349 | −1.514 | Cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase |
| SCH_0364 | MW962745 | −1.276 | −1.278 | Peroxisomal biogenesis factor 19 |
| SCH_0365 | MW962746 | −0.876 | −0.845 | Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K |
| SCH_0366 | MW962747 | −2.299 | −2.376 | Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase K |
| SCH_0367 | MW962748 | −0.410 | −0.455 | Ornithine decarboxylase |
| SCH_0368 | MW962749 | −0.168 | −0.123 | 60S ribosomal protein L7a |
| SCH_0369 | MW962750 | −1.603 | −1.589 | ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX54 |
| SCH_0370 | MW962751 | −1.714 | −1.708 | Apoptosis-inducing factor 1, mitochondrial |
| SCH_0371 | MW962752 | −0.943 | −0.899 | DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC3 |
| SCH_0372 | MW962753 | −0.306 | −0.294 | ADP, ATP carrier protein |
| SCH_0373 | MW962754 | −1.065 | −1.082 | ATP-dependent RNA helicase dbp2 |
| SCH_0374 | MW962755 | −1.408 | −1.473 | Aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic-like |
| SCH_0375 | MW962756 | −1.550 | −1.503 | Protein 5NUC |
| SCH_0376 | MW962757 | −0.702 | −0.604 | Sigma glutathione S-transferase |
| SCH_0377 | MW962758 | −1.787 | −1.745 | DEAD-box helicase Dbp80 |
| SCH_0378 | MW962759 | −1.644 | −1.642 | Hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase, mitochondrial |
| SCH_0379 | MW962760 | −2.156 | −2.098 | Ribitol-5-phosphate xylosyltransferase 1 |
| SCH_0380 | MW962761 | −1.381 | −1.359 | Dihydropyrimidinase |
| SCH_0381 | MW962762 | −0.716 | −0.648 | Protein stunted |
| SCH_0382 | MW962763 | −0.799 | −0.737 | Cytochrome b reductase 1 |
| SCH_0383 | MW962764 | −1.407 | −1.324 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit K |
| SCH_0384 | MW962765 | −1.562 | −1.567 | WASH complex subunit 3 |
| SCH_0385 | MW962766 | −0.319 | −0.302 | 40S ribosomal protein S16 |
| SCH_0386 | MW962767 | −0.356 | −0.329 | 60S ribosomal protein L15 |
| SCH_0387 | MW962768 | −1.392 | −0.916 | Lysozyme-like |
| SCH_0388 | MW962769 | −1.403 | −1.376 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-2 |
| SCH_0389 | MW962770 | −0.607 | −0.556 | Protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1 |
| SCH_0390 | MW962771 | −1.148 | −1.140 | Charged multivesicular body protein 4c |
| SCH_0391 | MW962772 | −0.516 | −0.518 | Malate dehydrogenase |
| SCH_0392 | MW962773 | −0.953 | −0.950 | Mid1-interacting protein 1 |
| SCH_0393 | MW962774 | −0.152 | −0.127 | 60S ribosomal protein L18 |
| SCH_0394 | MW962775 | −1.344 | −1.367 | GDAP2 homolog |
| SCH_0395 | MW962776 | −0.501 | −0.456 | Heat shock protein 20.6 |
| SCH_0396 | MW962777 | −1.294 | −1.291 | ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 2 |
| SCH_0397 | MW962778 | −0.572 | −1.071 | Prostatic acid phosphatase |
| SCH_0398 | MW962779 | −0.641 | −0.620 | S-phase kinase-associated protein 1 |
| SCH_0399 | MW962780 | −0.242 | −0.210 | 60S ribosomal protein L8 |
| SCH_0400 | MW962781 | −1.362 | −1.388 | Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 5-like |
| SCH_0401 | MW962782 | −1.100 | −1.167 | Tudor-SN |
| SCH_0402 | MW962783 | −1.050 | −1.068 | CYP450 |
| SCH_0403 | MW962784 | −1.246 | −1.431 | Trehalase |
| SCH_0404 | MW962785 | −1.132 | −1.131 | Peroxisomal membrane protein 2 |
| SCH_0405 | MW962786 | −0.943 | −0.954 | Angiotensin-converting enzyme |
| SCH_0406 | MW962787 | −0.321 | −0.298 | 60S ribosomal protein L4 |
| SCH_0407 | MW962788 | −0.975 | −0.970 | Na/K ATPase beta |
| SCH_0408 | MW962789 | −0.607 | −0.631 | Glutathione S-transferase delta |
| SCH_0409 | MW962790 | −0.497 | −0.472 | Phosphate carrier 2 |
| SCH_0410 | MW962791 | −2.200 | −2.239 | Phosphate carrier 1 |
| SCH_0411 | MW962792 | −1.636 | −1.625 | Transcription factor MafK |
| SCH_0412 | MW962793 | −1.334 | −1.370 | Segmentation protein cap'n'collar |
| SCH_0413 | MW962794 | −1.110 | −1.057 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 i |
| SCH_0414 | MW962795 | −1.803 | −1.811 | Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 15-like |
| SCH_0415 | MW962796 | −1.292 | −1.316 | Acyl-CoA-binding protein homolog |
| SCH_0416 | MW962797 | −1.576 | −1.606 | Pyroglutamyl-peptidase 1 |
| SCH_0417 | MW962798 | −1.615 | −1.627 | Zeta glutathione S-transferase |
| SCH_0418 | MW962799 | −2.145 | −2.233 | SAX-3 |
| SCH_0419 | MW962800 | −1.540 | −1.619 | 5-aminolevulinate synthase, erythroid-specific, mitochondrial |
| SCH_0420 | MW962801 | −0.923 | −0.922 | Nucleobindin-2 |
| SCH_0421 | MW962802 | −1.989 | −2.039 | Dyslexia-associated protein KIAA0319-like |
| SCH_0422 | MW962803 | −0.604 | −0.601 | Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 5 |
| SCH_0423 | MW962804 | −0.513 | −0.489 | Thymosin |
| SCH_0424 | MW962805 | −1.308 | −1.256 | Fatty acyl-CoA reductase |
| SCH_0425 | MW962806 | −1.289 | −1.231 | T-complex protein subunit eta |
| SCH_0426 | MW962807 | −0.609 | −1.585 | Timeless |
| SCH_0427 | MW962808 | −1.071 | −1.066 | Cuticlin-1 |
| SCH_0428 | MW962809 | −1.146 | −1.140 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C |
| SCH_0429 | MW962810 | −1.330 | −1.399 | Ig-like and fibronectin type-III domain-containing protein 1 |
| SCH_0430 | MW962811 | −1.320 | −1.314 | CD109 antigen-like |
| SCH_0431 | MW962812 | −1.545 | −1.541 | Poly(rC)-binding protein 3 |
| SCH_0432 | MW962813 | −0.541 | −0.555 | tRNA (uracil-5-)-methyltransferase |
| SCH_0433 | MW962814 | −0.795 | −0.804 | Enolase |
| SCH_0434 | MW962815 | −1.397 | −1.401 | NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-2 |
| SCH_0435 | MW962816 | −1.603 | −1.600 | TM2 domain-containing protein CG11103 |
| SCH_0436 | MW962817 | −1.525 | −1.527 | Dynein beta chain, ciliary |
| SCH_0437 | MW962818 | −0.981 | −0.968 | Peroxidase |
| SCH_0438 | MW962819 | −1.491 | −1.487 | Phospholipid phosphatase 2 |
| SCH_0439 | MW962820 | −1.544 | −1.586 | Draper |
| SCH_0440 | MW962821 | −0.378 | −0.398 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 A |
| SCH_0441 | MW962822 | −0.061 | −0.081 | 40S ribosomal protein S20 |
| SCH_0442 | MW962823 | −0.286 | −0.163 | Chemosensory protein |
| SCH_0443 | MW962824 | −1.139 | −0.964 | Cytochrome P450 CYP4G102 |
| SCH_0444 | MW962825 | −0.908 | −0.920 | Leucine-rich repeat protein SHOC-2 |
| SCH_0445 | MW962826 | −0.610 | −0.664 | Y-box factor homolog |
| SCH_0446 | MW962827 | −1.889 | −1.857 | Zinc transporter 9 |
| SCH_0447 | MW962828 | −1.604 | −1.265 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2 |
| SCH_0448 | MW962829 | −1.744 | −1.338 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 8 |
| SCH_0449 | MW962830 | −1.290 | −1.286 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit B |
| SCH_0450 | MW962831 | −1.217 | −1.153 | Apyrase |
| SCH_0451 | MW962832 | −1.550 | −1.539 | Myotubularin-related protein 9 |
| SCH_0452 | MW962833 | −1.067 | −1.077 | Ras-related protein Rab-5C |
| SCH_0453 | MW962834 | −1.482 | −1.453 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-6 |
| SCH_0454 | MW962835 | −0.649 | −0.827 | Serine protease 42 |
| SCH_0455 | MW962836 | −1.732 | −1.749 | E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase HECTD1 |
| SCH_0456 | MW962837 | −2.694 | −2.668 | EHMT2 histone-lysine N-methyltransferase |
| SCH_0457 | MW962838 | −0.928 | −0.971 | Enoyl-CoA hydratase, mitochondrial |
| SCH_0458 | MW962839 | −1.312 | −1.237 | Transcription factor Kayak |
| SCH_0459 | MW962840 | −2.248 | −2.277 | Zinc finger protein 674-like |
| SCH_0460 | MW962841 | −3.194 | −3.182 | DNA methyltransferase 1 |
| SCH_0461 | MW962842 | −1.041 | −1.088 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit J |
| SCH_0462 | MW962843 | −0.930 | −0.907 | Myeloid leukemia factor |
| SCH_0463 | MW962844 | −0.717 | −0.648 | Stathmin |
| SCH_0464 | MW962845 | −1.705 | −1.741 | Gualynate kinase |
| SCH_0465 | MW962846 | −1.234 | −1.237 | Kinase D-interacting substrate of 220 kDA |
| SCH_0466 | MW962847 | −1.551 | −1.603 | Thaumatin-like |
| SCH_0467 | MW962848 | −1.010 | −1.389 | Clavesin-1 |
| SCH_0468 | MW962849 | −1.486 | −1.455 | Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like |
| SCH_0469 | MW962850 | −0.759 | −0.774 | ras-like GTP-binding protein Rho1 |
| SCH_0470 | MW962851 | −1.723 | −1.743 | Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 4 |
| SCH_0471 | MW962852 | −1.792 | −1.777 | Lethal(2) giant larvae protein |
| SCH_0472 | MW962853 | −0.530 | −0.528 | Iron-sulfur cluster assembly scaffold protein IscU |
| SCH_0473 | MW962854 | −0.840 | −0.799 | GABA receptor-associated protein |
| SCH_0474 | MW962855 | −0.635 | −1.787 | Greglin |
| SCH_0475 | MW962856 | −1.938 | −2.109 | Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase |
| SCH_0476 | MW962857 | −1.221 | −1.412 | D-arabinitol dehydrogenase 1 |
| SCH_0477 | MW962858 | −0.724 | −1.045 | Lipoyltransferase 1 |
| SCH_0478 | MW962859 | −1.115 | −1.429 | Multifunctional protein ADE2 |
| SCH_0479 | MW962860 | −1.054 | −1.088 | Gelsolin |
| SCH_0480 | MW962861 | −1.094 | −1.086 | Upregulated during skeletal muscle growth 5 |
| SCH_0481 | MW962862 | −0.356 | −0.328 | Cysteine-rich protein 1 |
| SCH_0482 | MW962863 | −0.249 | −0.210 | 40S ribosomal protein S7 |
| SCH_0483 | MW962864 | −0.147 | −0.129 | 40S ribosomal protein S8 |
| SCH_0484 | MW962865 | −0.180 | −0.144 | 40S ribosomal protein S3a |
| SCH_0485 | MW962866 | −1.089 | −1.042 | Protein D2 |
| SCH_0486 | MW962867 | −0.500 | −0.523 | X-box-binding protein 1 |
| SCH_0487 | MW962868 | −1.197 | −1.014 | Lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF α-factor |
| SCH_0488 | MW962869 | −2.720 | −2.827 | Dimmed |
| SCH_0489 | MW962870 | −3.474 | −3.463 | Homeobox protein six1 |
| SCH_0490 | MW962871 | −1.466 | −1.467 | Dynein heavy chain, cytoplasmic |
| SCH_0491 | MW962872 | −0.974 | −0.949 | Growth hormone-inducible transmembrane protein-like |
| SCH_0492 | MW962873 | −0.407 | −0.553 | MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine-proteinkinase 1 |
| SCH_0493 | MW962874 | −0.510 | −0.695 | Catalase |
| SCH_0494 | MW962875 | −0.723 | −0.804 | Transketolase |
| SCH_0495 | MW962876 | −0.836 | −0.793 | Proteoglycan carrier of wingless |
| SCH_0496 | MW962877 | −1.300 | −1.362 | Lachesin |
| SCH_0497 | MW962878 | −0.785 | −1.110 | Acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase |
| SCH_0498 | MW962879 | −1.058 | −0.993 | Obstructor D2 |
| SCH_0499 | MW962880 | −0.650 | −0.654 | Merlin (moesin-ezrin-radixin-like) |
| SCH_0500 | MW962881 | −1.288 | −1.238 | Huntingtin-interacting protein K |
Abundance values are given as log10([mRNA of X]/[mRNA of 40S Ribosomal protein SA]). Functions are taken from the most similar BLAST search using default parameters. A list in alphabetical function order is available at http://asf-pht.medicine.dal.ca/SCH_Web/.
Distribution of Abundance Ratios
Abundance measurements were obtained by counting all the reads in each transcriptome that had overlapping agreement with a minimum or 90 contiguous nucleotides of the reading frame. The raw average ratio of all abundances (noise exposed/control) was 1.065, indicating close similarity between the general properties of the two transcriptomes. All abundances were normalized by the abundances of 40S Ribosomal SA transcripts in the two transcriptomes, yielding an average normalized ratio of 0.993.
The distribution of abundance ratios was wide, ranging from 0.069 to 3.038 (noise exposed/control), with a narrow peak near 1.0 (Fig. 2). This experimental distribution failed several tests for normality. For example, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test rejected the null hypothesis for normality with P < 0.001, and the Q-Q plot against the normal distribution was strongly nonlinear. In contrast, the Cauchy distribution (Eq. 1), which has previously been used for ratios of normally distributed variables (27), gave a close approximation over the entire range with parameters: x0 = 1.007, and γ = 0.865. The Cauchy distribution has no meaningful mean or variance values, but the median and mode are both equal to x0.
Given the single transcriptome data from each condition, and the nature of the ratio distribution, it was impossible to assign statistical significance to individual transcript ratios. Instead, we arbitrarily selected extreme low and high ratios in the cumulative distribution function (Eq. 2) from the lowest and highest 5% of the fitted distribution. All other ratios were not considered to be different from the expected distribution around 1.0.
Transcripts Affected by Noise Exposure
Transcripts with abundance ratios outside the 5% limits of both tails of the distribution are shown in Fig. 3. Table 2 lists the numerical values of the eight transcripts that we identified as increased by noise exposure. The list includes four endocuticle structural glycoprotein genes, and we note that another member of this gene group (SgAbd4, code: SCH_0144) fell just below the 5% list. The two most elevated transcripts encode a chemosensory protein precursor and a chemosensory protein. Completing the list are one of the four Na+/H+ exchangers that we found, and a lysozyme-like transcript.
Figure 3.
Transcripts at the two tails of the abundance distribution. Numerical values of the abundance ratios are given in Tables 2 and 3. Upper group have ratios above 95% of the cumulative distribution, and lower group have ratios below 5%. Dashed line shows the expected ratio of 1.0 for a transcript unaffected by noise exposure. SgAbd genes are members of the cuticular structural glycoprotein family. Na+/H+ indicates a sodium/proton ion exchanger. Transcripts with identical gene names have different nucleotide sequences and amino acid sequences (no overlapping reads) but matched genes with the same putative identity by BLAST search.
Table 2.
Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts having increased abundance in noise-exposed animals (abundance ratios >95% of all transcripts)
| ID Code | Noise/Control | Putative Function |
|---|---|---|
| SCH_0145 | 1.689 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 3 |
| SCH_0029 | 1.799 | Na/H Exchanger |
| SCH_0092 | 1.947 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2 |
| SCH_0447 | 2.180 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 2 |
| SCH_0448 | 2.546 | Endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd 8 |
| SCH_0387 | 2.996 | Lysozyme-like |
| SCH_0350 | 3.020 | Chemosensory protein |
| SCH_0324 | 3.038 | Chemosensory protein precursor |
Table 3 lists the 18 transcripts that were most reduced by noise exposure. The list contains several genes associated with lipid storage and transport (vitellogenins, apolipophorin, gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase, and pancreatic lipase-related protein). Also reduced were transcripts for protein storage (hexamerins), muscle (troponin and myosin), neuron-related proteins (clavesin and timeless), plus several enzymes with a range of possible functions (carboxylesterase, greglin, GILT-like, and prostatic acid phosphatase).
Table 3.
Schistocerca gregaria mRNA transcripts having reduced abundance in noise-exposed animals (abundance ratios <95% of all transcripts)
| ID Code | Noise/Control | Putative Function |
|---|---|---|
| SCH_0044 | 0.069 | Carboxylesterase |
| SCH_0474 | 0.071 | Greglin |
| SCH_0227 | 0.072 | Vitellogenin B |
| SCH_0208 | 0.072 | Vitellogenin A |
| SCH_0228 | 0.096 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0426 | 0.106 | Timeless |
| SCH_0362 | 0.217 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0332 | 0.221 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0255 | 0.255 | GILT-like |
| SCH_0233 | 0.293 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0015 | 0.310 | Apolipophorin precursor |
| SCH_0397 | 0.317 | Prostatic acid phosphatase |
| SCH_0215 | 0.373 | Hexamerin-like |
| SCH_0199 | 0.390 | Troponin |
| SCH_0467 | 0.418 | Clavesin-1 |
| SCH_0288 | 0.427 | Pancreatic lipase-related protein 2 |
| SCH_0247 | 0.444 | Gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase |
| SCH_0163 | 0.457 | Myosin heavy chain |
Transcription Factors Related to Sound Sensation
The amino acid sequences of the complete list of 66 possible transcription factors were compared by BLAST against the four genes recently associated with sound transduction in a study of age-related Drosophila deafness (7). No direct orthologs were identified but three Drosophila genes, optix, worniu, and amos, had amino acid sequences with more than 55% identity to locust transcripts (Table 4).
Table 4.
| Drosophila Name | GenBank Code | Locust ID, Name | Identical/Similar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optix | NP_524695.2 | SCH_0489, Six1 | 57% / 74% |
| Worniu | NP_476601.1 | SCH_0168, Scratch | 58% / 69% |
| Amos | ALC39557.1 | SCH_0488, Dimmed | 54% / 76% |
Notes: Alternate names for optix are Dmel and Six3. Alternate names for amos are helix-loop-helix, absent MD neurons, reduced olfactory organs, and rough eye. Worniu also matches many zinc finger transcription factors with lower similarity.
DISCUSSION
We cannot claim to have identified every gene transcript in Müller’s organ whose abundance was changed by noise exposure, but genes participating in most major functions were probably found. We might have failed to identify very low abundance transcripts, but we saw abundance values over almost 5 log units and in all the expected major functional groups.
Abundance Ratio Distributions and the Significance of Ratio Measurements
Changes in gene transcript abundance provide an important window into processes such as cancer development, aging, drug therapies, sensory stimulation, etc. and are encouraged by the increasing quality and availability of transcriptome data. But how significant are measured abundance ratios, compared to the experimental variability? A review of approaches to abundance ratio analysis, primarily for human cancer work, pointed out that reads are not often uniformly distributed along transcripts, and that total transcriptome reads from each gene provide an important, often ignored measure (28).
We based our approach on the previous finding that counting all the reads matching the coding frame gave relative abundance values that agreed with quantitative PCR measurements (26). The Cauchy distribution (27) can arise from the ratio of two normally distributed random variables with zero means. In the current situation, we had only single measurements of each abundance (control and noise exposed), but it is reasonable to assume that many independently made transcriptomes, each with multiple steps between tissue and final sequencing, would produce normally distributed abundance values for each transcript. This issue is worth exploring when multiple repeated transcriptomes become more feasible.
The shape of the Cauchy distribution implies that relatively large changes in gene expression ratios are difficult to interpret. For example, a 50% change might be impressive on a bar graph but would only fall within the expected range of Fig. 2. This could have important consequences for interpreting the increasing amount of transcriptome data encountered in clinical and experimental work.
Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Müller’s Organ
The two most strongly increased transcripts (Fig. 3, Table 2) encode chemosensory proteins. Although this family is eponymously involved in chemical sensation, they are widespread across tissues and phyla, with a range of functions based on binding to lipids (29). They have also been associated with development and modification of the integument (30). This agrees with the finding that four of the other increased transcripts encode structural glycoproteins that are used to construct the endocuticle layer of the integument. Increased expression of homologous transcripts in different termite castes was associated with increased thickness and hardness of the endocuticle (31), so noise exposure probably caused a thicker, harder tympanum. Another increased transcript was a lysozyme-like. These enzymes break glycosidic bonds, including those in chitin, supporting the picture of cuticle remodeling. However, apolipophorins are also involved in cuticular construction (32) and some of these were substantially reduced (Fig. 3).
Insect ears, like human ears, use active movement to improve sensitivity (6, 7). Our previous study found that noise exposure caused increased displacement of the tympanum by sound (3) and suggested three possible causes for this based on active and passive components of the sensilla, plus possible muscle attachments. We must now add changes in the cuticle of the tympanum, or possibly its supporting structures. Solitary locusts (8) had larger tympanal movement over a wide frequency range, but stronger neural responses only to high frequencies (15–20 kHz), whereas aged locusts had lower neural responses that were not correlated with tympanal movement (33), so the relationship between tympanal movement and sensory response is not straightforward. Aged Drosophila ears had less mechanical gain and reduced stiffness, which was used to predict a 50% reduction in functioning mechanically activated ion channels (7). However, no changes in the passive mechanical structures were recorded.
Two muscle protein transcripts, troponin and myosin heavy chain, were reduced by noise exposure (Fig. 3, Table 3). Myosin light chain was also reduced but slightly less. Therefore, reduced muscle tension is another candidate for increased tympanal compliance. Although a softer tympanum might be expected to move more easily, a stiffer tympanum might resist flexion between different regions of the cuticle, leading to greater movement at Müller’s organ. Resolution of these issues could be helped by recording from or manipulation of tympanal muscle to determine its contributions to passive and active tympanal movement. A better understanding of the frequency dependent mechanical properties of the complex tympanal structure is also desirable (22).
Metabolic Consequences of Noise Exposure
The most strongly reduced transcripts (Fig. 3) were from genes associated with cellular metabolism (vitellogenins, apolipophorin, gamma butyrobetaine dioxygenase, pancreatic lipase-related protein, and hexamerins), as well as enzymes that could support a wide range of cellular processes (carboxylesterase, greglin, GILT-like, and prostatic acid phosphatase). Neurons are active cells, particularly because action potentials consume considerable energy (34). Stimulation with a loud sound for 24 h presumably generated many action potentials in Müller’s organ. Noise exposure also produced metabolic stress in Drosophila auditory neurons (2), including changes in mitochondrial structure.
Turnover of mRNA transcripts is a complex process (35). Transcripts have half-lives ranging from a few minutes to many hours, and numerous mechanisms have been identified that degrade and modify mRNA. Stressed cells are known to reduce general protein synthesis, including aggregation of mRNA into granules targeted for storage or degradation. The duration of noise stimulation here was clearly adequate to initiate or interact with some of these processes. However, it is impossible to tell from the current evidence whether the broad reduction in transcripts supporting cell metabolism reflects feedback processes to protect the tissue from overstimulation, or exhaustion of the cell’s energy production mechanisms. Similarly, we do not yet know if the reduced metabolic capacity caused changes in auditory functions, such as ionic concentrations or muscle contractility.
Sensory Receptor Currents in Müller’s Organ
Previous experiments found normal membrane electrophysiology in noise-exposed sensory neurons, including the action potentials produced by sound or electrical stimulation (3). However, receptor current was significantly reduced. This suggests that sound exposure does not change general ionic concentrations but does affect mechanically activated ion channels or the transepithelial ion and voltage gradients (19) that drive the current. No reduction was seen in any of the transcripts from seven putative mechanically activated ion channels, confirming previous data (3). That leaves reduced transepithelial gradients as a possibility.
Insect epithelial ion transport involves several ion pumps, exchangers, and channels but is incompletely characterized (20). Although we found 32 transcripts of ion transporters and pumps, plus 24 ion channels, the only change caused by noise exposure was the increased abundance of one Na+/H+ exchanger (Fig. 3, Table 2). This sequence matches insect genes identified as exchanger 9B2, possibly of mitochondrial origin. However, all those sequences were predicted by genomic transcriptions, without any functions or tissue location.
The present data support our previous suggestion of reduced transepithelial gradients (3) but indicate that it arises indirectly from a loss of transcripts responsible for general cellular energy production. Reduction in noise-exposed Drosophila auditory receptor potential was also attributed to reduced metabolic capacity (2).
Two additional neural transcripts were reduced by noise exposure. Clavesins are Golgi apparatus proteins involved in vesicular trafficking (36). This may have been reduced by the overall metabolic effect. Timeless (37) is a component of the circadian mechanism but also involved in DNA replication and repair. Noise stimulation for 24 h probably disrupted circadian maintenance of this transcript.
What Drives the Noise-Induced Transcriptional Changes?
Transcription factors (TF) were implicated in an insect model of aged deafness (7), and mammalian TFs rescued insect hearing (38). The lack of TFs in the lists of affected transcripts is surprising. Orthopteran TFs are not well described. A review of insect TFs (39) listed only three in Locusta and two in Schistocerca, compared to 117 in Drosophila. Four TFs were identified as age-related regulators of auditory transduction in Drosophila (7), but no locust transcripts matching these (Table 4) were affected by noise exposure. The most strongly affected TF was SCH_0487 (1.526 noise/control). This putatively encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha, which has many possible functions, including in lyzosymes, so this may be linked to the increase in the lysozyme-like transcript.
Models of Deafness
Age and sound exposure can both cause deafness in mammals and insects, but the underlying mechanisms may be different. Age affects more physiological processes, and probably gene transcripts, than sound alone, making interactions between different systems possible. However, the limited data suggest that both mechanical coupling of sound and transduction of receptor current are usually involved. The recent description of the complete Schistocerca genome (40) promises to allow more structured studies of this interesting model of deafness.
GRANTS
This work is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada Grant RGPIN/03712 to A. S. French and Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship and a Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund Fellowship awarded to B. Warren. B. Warren was also supported by the Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavior at the University of Leicester.
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
A.S.F. and B.W. conceived and designed research; B.W. performed experiments; A.S.F. analyzed data; A.S.F. and B.W. interpreted results of experiments; A.S.F. prepared figures; A.S.F. drafted manuscript; A.S.F. and B.W. edited and revised manuscript; A.S.F. and B.W. approved final version of manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Neil Rimmer and Jake Cranston for locust husbandry.
REFERENCES
- 1.Salvi R, Boettcher FA. Animal models of noise-induced hearing loss. In: Sourcebook of Models for Biomedical Research, edited by Conn PM. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Christie KW, Sivan-Loukianova E, Smith WC, Aldrich BT, Schon MA, Roy M, Lear BC, Eberl DF. Physiological, anatomical, and behavioral changes after acoustic trauma in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 15449–15454, 2013. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307294110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Warren B, Fenton GE, Klenschi E, Windmill JF, French AS. Physiological basis of noise-induced hearing loss in a tympanal ear. J Neurosci 40: 3130–3140, 2020. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2279-19.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hoy RR, Robert D. Tympanal hearing in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 41: 433–450, 1996. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Markin VS, Hudspeth AJ. Gating-spring models of mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells of the internal ear. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 24: 59–83, 1995. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.24.060195.000423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Albert JT, Nadrowski B, Göpfert MC. Mechanical signatures of transducer gating in the Drosophila ear. Curr Biol 17: 1000–1006, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Keder A, Tardieu C, Malong L, Filia A, Kashkenbayeva A, Newton F, Georgiades M, Gale JE, Lovett M, Jarman AP, Albert JT. Homeostatic maintenance and age-related functional decline in the Drosophila ear. Sci Rep 10: 7431, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64498-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gordon SD, Windmill JF. Hearing ability decreases in ageing locusts. J Exp Biol 218: 1990–1994, 2015. doi: 10.1242/jeb.115113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.French AS, Torkkeli PH. . Sensory receptors and mechanotransduction. In: Cell Physiology Sourcebook, edited by Sperelakis N. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Coste B, Xiao B, Santos JS, Syeda R, Grandl J, Spencer KS, Kim SE, Schmidt M, Mathur J, Dubin AE, Montal M, Patapoutian A. Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature 483: 176–181, 2012. doi: 10.1038/nature10812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kernan M, Cowan D, Zuker C. Genetic dissection of mechanosensory transduction:mechanoreception-defective mutations of Drosophila. Neuron 12: 1195–1206, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim J, Chung YD, Park DY, Choi S, Shin DW, Soh H, Lee HW, Son W, Yim J, Park CS, Kernan MJ, Kim C. A TRPV family ion channel required for hearing in Drosophila. Nature 424: 81–84, 2003. doi: 10.1038/nature01733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cueva JG, Mulholland A, Goodman MB. Nanoscale organization of the MEC-4 DEG/ENaC sensory mechanotransduction channel in Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons. J Neurosci 27: 14089–14098, 2007. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4179-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pan B, Geleoc GS, Asai Y, Horwitz GC, Kurima K, Ishikawa K, Kawashima Y, Griffith AJ, Holt JR. TMC1 and TMC2 are components of the mechanotransduction channel in hair cells of the mammalian inner ear. Neuron 79: 504–515, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Field LH, Matheson T. Chordotonal organs of insects. Adv Insect Physiol 27: 1–228, 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60013-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Effertz T, Nadrowski B, Piepenbrock D, Albert JT, Göpfert MC. Direct gating and mechanical integrity of Drosophila auditory transducers require TRPN1. Nat Neurosci 15: 1198–1200, 2012. [Erratum in Nat Neurosci 17: 1840, 2014]. doi: 10.1038/nn.3175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Albert JT, Göpfert MC. Hearing in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol 34: 79–85, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Warren B, Matheson T. The role of the mechanotransduction ion channel candidate Nanchung-Inactive in auditory transduction in an insect ear. J Neurosci 38: 3741–3752, 2018. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2310-17.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thurm U, Wessel G. Metabolism-dependent transepithelial potential differences at epidermal receptors of arthropods. J Comp Physiol A 134: 119–130, 1979. doi: 10.1007/BF00610470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pullikuth AK, Filippov V, Gill SS. Phylogeny and cloning of ion transporters in mosquitoes. J Exp Biol 206: 3857–3868, 2003. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Müller J. Zur Vergleichenden Physiologie Des Gesichtsinnes Des Menschen Und Der Tiere. Leipzig: Knobloch, 1826. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Albrecht FO. The Anatomy of the Migratory Locust. London: University of London, The Athlone Press, 1953. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gray EG. The fine structure of the insect ear. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 243: 75–94, 1960. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1960.0005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices. Proteins 17: 49–61, 1993. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.French AS. Transcriptome walking: a laboratory-oriented GUI-based approach to mRNA identification from deep-sequenced data. BMC Res Notes 5: 673, 2012. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.French AS, Meisner S, Liu H, Weckström M, Torkkeli PH. Transcriptome analysis and RNA interference of cockroach phototransduction indicate three opsins and suggest a major role for TRPL channels. Front Physiol 6: 207, 2015. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang S, Fang Z. Beta approximation of ratio distribution and its application to next generation sequencing read counts. J Appl Stat 44: 57–70, 2017. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1158798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu G, Xuan N, Rajashekar B, Arnaud P, Offmann B, Picimbon JF. Comprehensive history of CSP genes: evolution, phylogenetic distribution and functions. Genes 11: 413, 2020. doi: 10.3390/genes11040413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Maleszka J, Forêt S, Saint R, Maleszka R. RNAi-induced phenotypes suggest a novel role for a chemosensory protein CSP5 in the development of embryonic integument in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Dev Genes Evol 217: 189–196, 2007. doi: 10.1007/s00427-006-0127-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rasheed H, Ye C, Meng Y, Ran Y, Li J, Su X. Comparative transcriptomic analysis and endocuticular protein gene expression of alate adults, workers and soldiers of the termite Reticulitermes aculabialis. BMC Genomics 20: 742, 2019. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6149-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhao Y, Liu W, Zhao X, Yu Z, Guo H, Yang Y, Zhang J, Moussian B, Zhang J. Apolipophorin-II/I contributes to cuticular hydrocarbon transport and cuticle barrier construction in Locusta migratoria. Front Physiol 11: 790, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gordon SD, Jackson JC, Rogers SM, Windmill JF. Listening to the environment: hearing differences from an epigenetic effect in solitarious and gregarious locusts. Proc Biol Sci 281: 20141693, 2014. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sengupta B, Stemmler M, Laughlin SB, Niven JE. Action potential energy efficiency varies among neuron types in vertebrates and invertebrates. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000840, 2010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Borbolis F, Syntichaki P. Cytoplasmic mRNA turnover and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 152: 32–42, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Katoh Y, Ritter B, Gaffry T, Blondeau F, Höning S, McPherson PS. The clavesin family, neuron-specific lipid- and clathrin-binding Sec14 proteins regulating lysosomal morphology. J Biol Chem 284: 27646–27654, 2009. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.034884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ousley A, Zafarullah K, Chen Y, Emerson M, Hickman L, Sehgal A. Conserved regions of the timeless (tim) clock gene in Drosophila analyzed through phylogenetic and functional studies. Genetics 148: 815–825, 1998. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.2.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Weinberger S, Topping MP, Yan J, Claeys A, Geest N, Ozbay D, Hassan T, He X, Albert JT, Hassan BA, Ramaekers A. Evolutionary changes in transcription factor coding sequence quantitatively alter sensory organ development and function. eLife 6: e26402, 2017. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guo Z, Qin J, Zhou X, Zhang Y. Insect transcription factors: a landscape of their structures and biological functions in drosophila and beyond. Int J Mol Sci 19: 3691, 2018. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Verlinden H, Sterck L, Li J, Li Z, Yssel A, Gansemans Y, Verdonck R, Holtof M, Song H, Behmer ST, Sword GA, Matheson T, Ott SR, Deforce D, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Van de Peer Y, Vanden Broeck J. First draft genome assembly of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. F1000Res 9: 775, 2020. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25148.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



