Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Jun 9;50(1):116–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.06.001

Non-ventilator associated hospital acquired pneumonia incidence and health outcomes among U.S. veterans from 2016-2020

Evan Carey a,b,, Richard Blankenhorn c, Peter Chen c, Shannon Munro d
PMCID: PMC8286236  PMID: 34116083

Abstract

Among 1,635,711 Veteran acute care admissions (FY2016-2020), the risk of non-ventilator associated hospital acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) was 1.26 cases per 1,000 hospitalized days and decreased linearly over time with an uptick in cases in the last year coinciding with the onset of the covid-19 pandemic. Veterans who develop NV-HAP experience remarkably higher 30-day and 1-year mortality, longer length of stay, and higher rates of inpatient sepsis. Monitoring and prevention measures may substantially reduce negative outcomes.

Key words: Non-ventilator associated hospital acquired pneumonia, Non-device related pneumonia, Inpatient sepsis, Mortality, Hospital acquired infection, Veterans

INTRODUCTION

Hospital acquired pneumonia is the most common hospital acquired infection and more commonly occurs in nonventilated patients.1, 2, 3 However, there is a paucity of nationally reported data identifying trends in incidence, risk factors, and patient outcomes for non-ventilator associated hospital acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP), a largely preventable complication.4 As the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States (U.S.), the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is uniquely positioned to monitor and prevent NV-HAP and its sequelae.

The objectives of this work are: (1) identify the trends in the incidence rate of NV-HAP and (2) identify differences in demographics, clinical comorbidities, diagnoses documented as present on admission, and Veteran outcomes associated with developing NV-HAP.

Material and methods

This retrospective cohort analysis identified U.S. Veterans at risk for NV-HAP hospitalized in VA acute care settings between 2016-2020. Acute care admissions between October 1, 2015 and October 1, 2020 were identified (2,766,610 admissions among 1,208,124 unique Veterans) with the following exclusions: length of stay less than 48 hours (n = 1,110,921), no admission diagnosis present (n = 37), diagnosis of acute respiratory distress, failure, asphyxia, or respiratory arrest present on admission (n = 175,626), and discharge date after 10/28/2020 (n = 12). These criteria excluded a total of 1,130,899 admissions, leaving 1,635,711 admissions (816,720 Veterans) at risk for NV-HAP.

NV-HAP cases were identified by the presence of an ICD10 code for bacterial pneumonia >48 hours after admission with present on admission (POA) indicated as ‘no’, consistent with prior publications.2 The following list of ICD-10 codes were used: B95.3, B96.0, J13., J15.X, J16.X, J17.X, J18.X, J84.111, J84.116, J84.117, J84.2, J85.1, and J85.2.

Other clinical outcomes assessed included development of sepsis, length of stay, 30-day and 1-year mortality. Sepsis (CCS-R INF002), severe sepsis (R65.2X), and septic shock (R65.21) was identified if it was not POA. Clinical comorbidities and risk factors present on or prior to hospital admission for NV-HAP were summarized as the Quan-Charlson Index using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCS-R) categories.5

Demographics, comorbidities, common diagnoses documented as POA, and outcomes were compared between Veterans who developed NV-HAP and those who did not with descriptive statistics and standardized mean differences (Table 1 ). We quantified the rate of NV-HAP cases per 1,000 at-risk hospitalized days overall and by year-quarter (Fig 1).

Table 1.

Demographics, clinical comorbidities, diagnoses documented as present on admission, and Veteran outcomes among Veterans hospitalized in acute care settings and at risk of NV-HAP

Variable NV-HAP No NV-HAP SMD
Total unique index admissions 11,291 1,624,420
Demographics
Age, mean (SD) 70.46 (10.82) 68.23 (12.54) 0.191
Male Gender, N (%) 10,991 (97.3) 1,542,840 (95.0) 0.123
Race, N (%) 0.03
Caucasian 8,174 (72.4) 1,161,236 (71.5)
African American 2,382 (21.1) 357,738 (22.0)
American Indian 69 (0.6) 11,743 (0.7)
Asian 53 (0.5) 6,986 (0.4)
Pacific Islander 74 (0.7) 12,260 (0.8)
Missing 539 (4.8) 74,457 (4.6)
Ethnicity, N (%) 0.07
Hispanic Latino 945 (8.4) 105,109 (6.5)
Not Hispanic Latino 10,011 (88.7) 1,469,835 (90.5)
Missing 335 (3.0) 49,476 (3.0)
Clinical Comorbidities in 1 year prior to admission
Myocardial infarction, N (%) 957 (8.5) 121,823 (7.5) 0.036
Congestive heart failure, N (%) 2,800 (24.8) 367,258 (22.6) 0.052
Peripheral vascular disease, N (%) 2,345 (20.8) 281,419 (17.3) 0.088
Cerebrovascular disease, N (%) 1,332 (11.8) 173,509 (10.7) 0.035
Dementia, N (%) 915 (8.1) 118,775 (7.3) 0.03
Chronic pulmonary disease, N (%) 4,111 (36.4) 460,867 (28.4) 0.172
Connective tissue disease, N (%) 246 (2.2) 31,734 (2.0) 0.016
Peptic Ulcer disease, N (%) 268 (2.4) 29,470 (1.8) 0.039
Mild Liver Disease, N (%) 1,351 (12.0) 179,825 (11.1) 0.028
Diabetes without comp, N (%) 4,016 (35.6) 599,685 (36.9) 0.028
Diabetes with comp, N (%) 2,336 (20.7) 334,657 (20.6) 0.002
Hemiplegia paraplegia, N (%) 539 (4.8) 56,737 (3.5) 0.064
Renal disease, N (%) 2,877 (25.5) 361,263 (22.2) 0.076
Cancer, N (%) 2,861 (25.3) 299,649 (18.4) 0.167
Sever liver disease, N (%) 244 (2.2) 36,530 (2.2) 0.006
Metastatic solid tumor 640 (5.7) 66,411 (4.1) 0.073
AIDS 125 (1.1) 15,724 (1.0) 0.014
Charlson index, mean (SD) 3.51 (3.07) 3.04 (2.93) 0.156
Discharge Diagnoses documented as present on admission (30 most frequent conditions for each group)
Chronic kidney disease, N (%) 3,535 (31.3) 412,226 (25.4) 0.132
Diabetes mellitus, Type 2, N (%) 3,979 (35.2) 639,425 (39.4) 0.085
Disorders of lipid metabolism, N (%) 4,202 (37.2) 697,159 (42.9) 0.117
Hyperplasia of prostate, N (%) 2,091 (18.5) 327,398 (20.2) 0.041
Essential hypertension, N (%) 3,617 (32.0) 641,179 (39.5) 0.156
Heart failure, N (%) 3,338 (29.6) 401,196 (24.7) 0.11
Coronary atherosclerosis and other heart disease, N (%) 3,539 (31.3) 495,727 (30.5) 0.018
Diabetes mellitus with complication, N (%) 2,441 (21.6) 340,421 (21.0) 0.016
Fluid and electrolyte disorders, N (%) 3,440 (30.5) 393,026 (24.2) 0.141
Hypertension with complications and secondary hypertension, N (%) 3,964 (35.1) 487,519 (30.0) 0.109
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis, N (%) 3,543 (31.4) 419,799 (25.8) 0.123
Bacterial infections, N (%) 2,254 (20.0) 326,687 (20.1) 0.004
Cardiac dysrhythmias, N (%) 2,941 (26.0) 376,208 (23.2) 0.067
Esophageal disorders, N (%) 2,567 (22.7) 400,398 (24.6) 0.045
Sleep wake disorders, N (%) 1,944 (17.2) 347,541 (21.4) 0.106
Diabetes mellitus without complication, N (%) 1,625 (14.4) 313,457 (19.3) 0.131
Acute and unspecified renal failure, N (%) 2,784 (24.7) 311,932 (19.2) 0.132
Aplastic anemia, N (%) 2,628 (23.3) 283,237 (17.4) 0.145
Depressive disorders, N (%) 1,701 (15.1) 277,755 (17.1) 0.055
Tobacco-related disorders, N (%) 1,694 (15.0) 250,656 (15.4) 0.012
Alcohol-related disorders, N (%) 1,249 (11.1) 188,506 (11.6) 0.017
Abnormal findings without diagnosis, N (%) 1,292 (11.4) 211,425 (13.0) 0.048
Other general signs and symptoms, N (%) 1,382 (12.2) 182,798 (11.3) 0.031
Neurocognitive disorders, N (%) 1,210 (10.7) 149,023 (9.2) 0.052
Other specified and unspecified gastrointestinal disorders, N (%) 1,582 (14.0) 183,137 (11.3) 0.082
Thyroid disorders, N (%) 1,265 (11.2) 184,584 (11.4) 0.005
Trauma- and stressor-related disorders, N (%) 1,059 (9.4) 181,205 (11.2) 0.059
Other specified nervous system disorders, N (%) 1,434 (12.7) 172,826 (10.6) 0.064
Other specified status, N (%) 1,118 (9.9) 159,926 (9.8) 0.002
Nervous system pain and pain syndromes, N (%) 1,098 (9.7) 172,299 (10.6) 0.029
Malnutrition, N (%) 1,840 (16.3) 96,836 (6.0) 0.333
Pressure ulcer of skin, N (%) 1,033 (9.1) 93,030 (5.7) 0.131
Septicemia, N (%) 1,167 (10.3) 123,727 (7.6) 0.095
Secondary malignancies, N (%) 837 (7.4) 72,857 (4.5) 0.124
Peripheral and visceral vascular disease, N (%) 1,235 (10.9) 134,706 (8.3) 0.09
Veteran outcomes following index hospitalization
At-risk length of stay, mean (SD) 27.26 (65.46) 5.09 (15.40) 0.466
Inpatient Sepsis, N (%) 3,060 (27.1) 12,175 (0.7) 0.823
Inpatient Septic Shock, N (%) 1,280 (11.3) 4,965 (0.3) 0.485
Inpatient Severe Sepsis, N (%) 1,787 (15.8) 6,561 (0.4) 0.589
30-day mortality, N (%) 2,157 (19.1) 91,300 (5.6) 0.419
1-year mortality, N (%) 5,346 (47.3) 362,717 (22.3) 0.544
30-day readmission, N (%) 0.55
at least 1 readmission 2,011 (17.8) 283,333 (17.4)
deceased during index stay 1,971 (17.5) 32,981 (2.0)
no readmission 7,309 (64.7) 1,308,106 (80.5)

Note: Differences between Veterans who developed NV-HAP and those who didn't are summarized as standardized mean differences (SMD), with SMD's above 0.1 bolded.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

The rate NV-HAP cases per calendar year quarter between 2015Q4-2020Q2.

The activities undertaken in the project supported VHA operational programs and did not constitute research. This work was supported by the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program of the VHA Health Services Research and Development Service and the Diffusion of Excellence Initiative under a VHA program evaluation.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 1,635,711 acute admissions between 2016 and 2020 and at risk for NV-HAP, Veterans who developed NV-HAP were older, more likely to be male, and have previously documented comorbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer, and higher comorbidity index (Table 1). Discharge diagnoses documented as POA were imbalanced between those who developed NV-HAP and those who did not (Table 1). The overall rate of NV-HAP was 1.26 per 1,000 hospitalized days. It decreased from 1.56 in 2015Q4 to 1.01 in 2019Q4, but then increased to 1.26 in 2020Q2 coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (Fig 1 ). Outcomes were worse among Veterans who developed NV-HAP compared to those who did not: the average length of stay (LOS) was 27.3 days (22 days longer), 30-day mortality was 19.1% (3.3 times higher), 1-year mortality was 47.3% (2.1 times higher), and septic shock occurred in 11.2% of admissions (36 times higher).

DISCUSSION

The overall NV-HAP rates found in VHA acute care settings are less than half the previously published NV-HAP rates estimated from U.S. hospitals in 2012 using similar research methods.2 The trend in NV-HAP rates was generally decreasing between FY2016-2020 with apparent seasonality; however, NV-HAP rates started to increase after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 Q2 (Fig 1). The observed decrease in the NV-HAP rates may be due to NV-HAP focused VHA quality improvement (QI) programs such as HAPPEN (Hospital Acquired Pneumonia Prevention by Engaging Nurses).6 Further robust evaluation of facility level exposure to the QI programs and changes in associated NV-HAP rates is warranted.

The observed increase in secondary bacterial pneumonia cases including NV-HAP post pandemic is concerning. An increased focus on COVID-19 infection prevention measures may reduce some HAI's7; however, known NV-HAP prevention measures not typically associated with infection control may be neglected including consistent oral care, head of bed elevation, and early and frequent ambulation.8 Alternatively, the average risk profile of Veterans hospitalized in acute care settings likely increased during the pandemic; if these Veterans are at higher risk of NV-HAP, the observed increase could be due to the changing inpatient population composition and associated average NV-HAP risk. Risk over time models adjusted for individual traits should be implemented to further understand and monitor this potential patient safety issue.

Veterans who developed NV-HAP had dramatically worse outcomes compared to those who did not, yet there were only moderate differences in any individual clinical comorbidity, demographic, or discharge diagnosis present on admission. Further analysis of patient risk using multivariate modeling techniques should be explored to identify if more effective risk stratification is feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

NV-HAP is a largely preventable complication that is costly in terms of morbidity, mortality, and burden to the health care system and larger community. Although the risk of NV-HAP is low for individuals, health outcomes for Veterans who experience NV-HAP are dramatically worse than previously reported in the literature. Amidst focused efforts to decrease NV-HAP transmission, the rate of NV-HAP among Veterans generally decreased between 2016-2020. However, there was an uptick in NV-HAP cases correlated with timing of the U.S. COVID-19 outbreak, highlighting the need to maintain quality of care during a period of unprecedented stress to the system. Further studies identifying the impact of NV-HAP QI programs such as HAPPEN are warranted and may explain the apparent decrease in the risk of NV-HAP observed between 2016-2019.

Acknowledgments

The VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program of the VHA Health Services Research and Development Service and the Diffusion of Excellence Initiative funded this approved non-research evaluation (VHA program guide 1200.21) through grant PEC-19-306 conducted under the authority of the VHA Office of Nursing Services.

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Government or any of its agencies. This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Cleveland-Denver-Seattle VA Collaborative Evaluation Center and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Salem, VA. The authors thank Rob Klocko, MA and Annie Grause, BS for their project assistance.

There are no potential conflicts of interest to disclose

Footnotes

Evan Carey, PhD 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; Richard Blankenhorn, MSDA, BSF 2, 3, 4,5; Peter Chen, MPH 2, 3, 4, 5 Shannon Munro, PhD, APRN, NP 1, 2, 3, 4, 6

1 Conception and design

2 Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data

3 Drafting of the manuscript

4 Critical revision of the manuscript

5 Statistical analysis

6. Led or assisted with obtaining funding

References

  • 1.Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care–associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1198–1208. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Giuliano KK, Baker D, Quinn B. The epidemiology of nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in the United States. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46:322–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giuliano KK, Baker D, Quinn B. Non-ventilator hospital acquired pneumonia in U.S. hospitals: incidence and cost. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:S20–S21. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaneoka A, Pisegna JM, Miloro KV, et al. Prevention of healthcare-associated pneumonia with oral care in individuals without mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:899–906. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Agency for healthcare research and quality, Rockville, MD. Clin Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) 2020 www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccsr/ccs_refined.jsp Published. Accessed December 2, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Munro S, Baker D. Reducing missed oral care opportunities to prevent non-ventilator associated hospital acquired pneumonia at the Department of Veterans Affairs. Appl Nurs Res. 2018;44:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cole J, Barnard E. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare acquired infections with multidrug resistant organisms. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49:653–654. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pássaro L, Harbarth S, Landelle C. Prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-ventilated adult patients: a narrative review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5 doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0150-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Infection Control are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES