Abstract
Objective:
NAFLD is a complex disease marked by cellular abnormalities leading to NASH. NAFLD patients manifest low hepatic levels of CEACAM1, a promoter of insulin clearance. Consistently, Cc1−/− null mice displayed spontaneous hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance and steatohepatitis. Liver-specific reconstitution of Ceacam1 reversed these metabolic anomalies in 8-month-old Cc1−/−xliver+ mice fed a regular chow diet. The current study examined whether it would also reverse progressive hepatic fibrosis in mice fed a high-fat (HF) diet.
Methods:
3-month-old mice were fed a high-fat diet for 3–5 months, and metabolic and histopathological analysis were conducted to evaluate their NASH phenotype.
Results:
Reconstituting CEACAM1 to Cc1−/− livers curbed diet-induced liver dysfunction and NASH, including macrovesicular steatosis, lobular inflammation, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and chicken-wire bridging fibrosis. Persistence of hepatic fibrosis in HF-fed Cc1−/− treated with nicotinic acid demonstrated a limited role for lipolysis and adipokine release in hepatic fibrosis caused by Ceacam1 deletion.
Conclusions:
Restored metabolic and histopathological phenotype of HF-fed Cc1−/−xliver+ assigned a critical role for hepatic CEACAM1 in preventing NAFLD/NASH including progressive hepatic fibrosis.
Keywords: Hyperinsulinemia, insulin clearance, insulin resistance, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatic fibrosis
1. Introduction
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a complex disease encompassing a cadre of metabolic dysregulation and histological anomalies that include hepatic steatosis without or with inflammation, chicken-wire bridging fibrosis and apoptosis that advance non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [1]. The disease is commonly associated with metabolic syndrome in light of their parallel epidemic spread worldwide [2] and of shared intertwined mechanisms underlying their pathogenesis. These include, insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, inflammation and oxidative stress [3–6].
Chronic hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance play a critical role in the initiation and early switch from simple steatosis to NAFLD [7, 8]. This provided the impetus to use insulin sensitizers as therapeutic modalities to curb NAFLD in patients with insulin resistance in the absence of an FDA-approved drug specifically targeting fibrosis in NASH [9, 10].
Chronic hyperinsulinemia in patients with NAFLD has been attributed to impaired insulin clearance [11]. Moreover, insulin-resistant obese subjects with NAFLD manifested reduced hepatic levels of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Related Cell Adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) [12, 13], a glycoprotein that promotes receptor-mediated insulin uptake in hepatocytes followed by its degradation [14]. Consistently, mice with global [15, 16] and liver-specific [17] deletion of Ceacam1 gene, and L-SACC1 mice with its liver-specific inactivation [18] manifested chronic hyperinsulinemia driven by impaired insulin clearance. This in turn, caused insulin resistance (due to downregulation of the insulin receptor) and hepatic steatosis (owing to increased hyperinsulinemia-driven SREBP-1c activation of lipogenic genes transcription and to the loss of insulin’s repression of FASN activity mediated by CEACAM1 phosphorylation [19]). With fatty acid β-oxidation being compromised, the increase in de novo lipogenesis tips the balance towards fat accumulation (hepatic steatosis) and drives its redistribution to white adipose tissue (WAT) for storage (visceral obesity). In agreement with increased inflammatory response to fat accumulation, global Cc1−/− nulls developed steatohepatitis [20] in the absence of deranged cholesterol homeostasis [21]. Fed a high-fat diet, they also developed a progressive NASH-like phenotype including macrosteatosis and lipid peroxidation in addition to apoptosis and advanced fibrosis [22]. Similarly, liver-specific AlbCre+Cc1fl/fl nulls manifested NASH with advanced fibrosis when propagated on the Ldlr−/− background and fed a cholesterol-enriched diet [23].
Because CEACAM1 is expressed in all liver cells that are virtually implicated in stellate cell activation [24], and in light of the positive role of free-cholesterol lipotoxicity in hepatocellular injury [4], the aforementioned loss-of-function models do not efficiently delineate the primary role of hyperinsulinemia caused by Ceacam1 deletion in hepatocytes independently of altered cholesterol homeostasis. Because liver-specifc reconstitution of CEACAM1 restored insulin clearance and normal metabolism in Cc1−/− mice fed a regular diet [25], the current studies investigated whether it can also reverse the advanced fibrogenic NASH phenotype driven by prolonged high-fat feeding in parallel to restoring normoinsulinemia and insulin sensitivity.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Mice maintenance
As previously described [25], mice with global Ceacam1 deletion (C57BL/6J.Cc1−/− or Cc1−/−) were bred with mice harboring liver-specific overexpression of rat Ceacam1 transgene driven by apolipoprotein-A1 promoter (L-CC1) [26]. Genotyping was performed [25] by PCR analysis (Fig. S1) using rat and mouse specific primers (Fig. S1B). In addition to L-CC1, control littermates include Cc1+/+ without the transgene. Only male mice were examined. All mice were kept in a 12-hour dark/light cycle and fed ad libitum a standard chow (RD) or a 45% high-fat (HF) diet (Research Diets, Catalog D12451, New Brunswick, NJ) for 3–5 months prior being placed in cages with Alpha-dri bedding (Shepherd Specialty Papers) and phenotyped. In some experiments, mice were injected intraperitoneally once daily with nicotinic acid (200mg/kg BW/day) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) for 2 days [25]. All procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Utilization Committees of participating institutions.
2.2. Insulin and glucose tolerance tests
Following a 6-hour-fast, mice were injected intraperitoneally with insulin (0.75 U/kg BW, Novo Nordisk) (for insulin tolerance) or glucose (1.5 g/kg BW of 50% dextrose solution, Dextrose Injection, USP) (for glucose tolerance). Blood was drawn from the tail vein at 0–180 min post-injection to measure glucose levels.
2.3. Whole body composition
This was assessed in live mice by nuclear magnetic resonance (Bruker Minispec, Billerica, MA, USA).
2.4. Metabolic parameters
Mice were fasted overnight and retro-orbital blood was drawn beginning at 11:00 a.m. the following morning to assess steady-state levels of plasma insulin (Mouse Ultrasensitive ELISA kit, Alpco, Salem, NH), C-peptide (ELISA, Alpco), non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA C kit, Wako Diagnostics, Richmond, VA), triacylglycerol (Pointe Scientific Triglyceride), endothelin-1 (ELISA kit, ab133030, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), TNFα (SimpleStep ELISA kit, ab208348, Abcam) and IL-6 (ELISA Kit, ab222503, Abcam). Hepatic triacylglycerol was measured as previously described [26], hepatic nitric oxide (NO) levels using Nitrate/Nitrite Fluorometric Assay (780051, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI), and hepatic levels of reduced glutathione (GSH) were measured using the Bioxytech GSH-400 kit (OXISResearch, Portland, OR). Plasma Alanine Transaminase (ALT) (ab105134, Abcam) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) (ab105135) colorimetric assays kits were used to assess liver function.
2.5. Liver histology
Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver sections. Deparaffinized and rehydrated slides were stained with 0.1% Sirius Red (Sigma, Direct Red 80) to assess fibrosis using the Brunt Criteria for scoring, as described [27].
2.6. Fatty acid synthase activity
Frozen livers were homogenized and the supernatant was added to a reaction mix containing 0.1μCi [14C] malonyl-coenzyme A (Perkin-Elmer, Akron, OH) [19]. 1:1 chloroform: methanol solution was added to stop the reaction, and fatty acid synthase activity was calculated as counts/min of [14C] incorporated/μg cell lysates.
2.7. Ex-vivo palmitate oxidation
Livers were homogenized before being incubated in 0.2mM of [1-14C] palmitate (0.5 mCi/ml) (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St Louis, MO), as described [25]. Perchloric acid was added to stop the reaction and recover the radioactive acid soluble metabolites. Trapped CO2 radioactivity and partial oxidation products were measured using liquid scintillation. The oxidation rate was expressed as the sum of complete and partial fatty acid oxidation expressed in nmoles/g/min.
2.8. Western blot analysis
Livers were lysed and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoprobing with polyclonal antibodies against phospho-Smad2 (Ser465/467), phospho-Smad3 (Ser423/425), Smad-7, α-SMA, CHOP, phospho-Stat3 (Y705), phospho-NF-κB (S536), phospho-eNOS (Ser 1177), phospho-PKCζ (phosphothreonine-Thr 410/403) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, and custom-made rabbit polyclonal 3759 against mouse CEACAM1, and custom-made rat CEACAM1 (αP3[Y488]) [25]. For normalization, proteins were probed with polyclonal antibodies against Smad 2, Smad3, Stat3, NF-κB, eNOS, PKCζ and Tubulin (Cell Signaling) using parallel gels. Blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG or sheep anti-mouse IgG antibody (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Amersham, Marlborough, MA) and proteins were visualized using ECL (Amersham).
2.9. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from livers with NucleoSpin RNA Kit (740955.50, Macherey-Nagel, Bethlehem, PA) and from white adipose tissue using TRIzol Reagent (15596026, Ambion, Life Technologies, CA). cDNA was synthesized by iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Life Science, Hercules, CA), using 1μg of total RNA and oligodT primers. cDNA was evaluated with semi-quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR; StepOne Plus, Applied Biosystems), and mRNA was normalized to GAPDH (for regular diet fed mice), 18S (for high-fat fed mice) or 36B4 (for white adipose tissue regardless of diet). using primers listed in Table S2.
2.10. Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s for multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism 7 software. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Rescuing hepatic CEACAM1 expression in Cc1−/− mice restored insulin clearance and sensitivity in mice fed a high-fat diet
Western blot analysis of liver lysates detected transgenic rat, but not endogenous mouse CEACAM1 in RD-fed and HF-fed Cc1−/−xliver+ mice (Fig. 1A). Using rat- and mouse-specific primers (Fig. S1B; Table S2), qRT-PCR detected mRNA of transgenic rat Ceacam1 in the liver, but not in the hypothalamus, skeletal muscle or WAT of Cc1−/−xliver+ mice (Table S1).
Fig. 1.

Expression and metabolic analysis. 3-month-old male mice were fed RD or HF diet for 3 months (n>5 per genotype/feeding group). (A) CEACAM1 protein level was analysed by immunoblotting (Ib) liver lysates with polyclonal antibodies against mouse (α-mCC1) or rat (α-rCC1) CEACAM1. To normalize against protein loading, the lower half of the membrane was immunoblotted with α-Tubulin. Numbers to the right of the gels indicate apparent molecular mass (kDa). Gels represent 2 experiments performed on 2 different mice/genotype. (B) mice were subjected to an intraperitoneal injection of insulin (0.75 U/kg BW) (panels i, iii), and glucose (1.5 g/kg BW) (panels ii and iv) to evaluate blood glucose levels at 0–180 or 0–120 min post-injection, respectively.
As Table 1 shows, liver-specifiic CEACAM1 reconstitution reversed total fat and plasma NEFA, and restored lean mass in 6-month-old RD-fed Cc1−/− mice (Table 1), as expected from the previously reported effect on 8-month-old mice [25]. It exerted a similar protective effect when mice were fed HF for 3 (Table 1) and 5 months (not shown). Consistent with a key role for CEACAM1 in promoting insulin clearance, steady-state C-peptide/insulin molar ratio was lower in RD-fed and HF-fed Cc1−/− nulls, leading to chronic hyperinsulinemia (Table 1). This leads to insulin resistance [assessed by insulin intolerance (Fig. 1B) and fed hyperglycemia in RD-fed and HF-fed nulls relative to controls (Table 1)]. The mutation also caused glucose intolerance in response to both diets (Fig. 1B). In contrast to Cc1+/+ and L-CC1 controls, HF caused fasting hyperglycemia in Cc1−/− nulls. Liver-specific redelivery of Ceacam1 restored insulin clearance to reverse hyperinsulinemia and fed hyperglycemia (Table 1), and normalized insulin and glucose tolerance in RD-fed and HF-fed Cc1−/−xliver+ mice (Fig. 1B). It also reversed diet-induced fasting hyperglycemia (Table 1) even after 5 months of HF intake (119±9 in Cc1−/−xliver+ vs 154±7 in Cc1−/− mice).
Table 1.
Plasma and tissue metabolic parameters
| Cc1+/+ | L-CC1 | Cc1−/− | Cc1−/−xliver+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a) RD | ||||
| % Fat mass | 12.6 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 0.4 | 17.2 ± 0.6 ab | 13.1 ± 0.1 c |
| % Lean mass | 72.5 ± 1.0 | 77.0 ± 2.1 | 63.7 ± 1.0 ab | 73.1 ± 1.3 c |
| Plasma NEFA (mEq/l) | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 ab | 0.4 ± 0.2 c |
| Plasma Insulin (pM) | 76.6 ± 1.2 | 74.4 ± 1.0 | 140.6 ± 5.1 ab | 74.1 ± 0.8 c |
| Plasma C-peptide (pM) | 433.7 ± 1.9 | 415.8 ± 11.6 | 583.7 ± 3.1 ab | 431.6 ± 0.4 c |
| C-peptide/Insulin | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.1 ab | 5.8 ± 0.1 c |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) | 95 ± 8 | 75 ± 7 | 89 ± 2 | 73 ± 8 |
| Fed blood glucose (mg/dl) | 104 ± 9 | 93 ± 5 | 152 ± 7 ab | 85 ± 5 c |
| Hepatic triglycerides (μg/mg) | 59.1 ± 4.3 | 57.8 ± 1.1 | 84.1 ± 7.1 ab | 57.9 ± 6.1 c |
| Plasma triglycerides (mg/dl) | 51.4 ± 0.7 | 50.7 ± 2.1 | 51.9 ± 0.8 | 49.9 ± 1.1 |
| Hepatic total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 71 ± 6.1 | 75.7 ± 3.9 | 75.3 ± 3.4 | 75.3 ± 3.4 |
| b) HF | ||||
| % Fat mass | 25.4 ± 0.6 | 26.9 ± 0.4 | 30.6 ± 0.5 ab | 24.5 ± 1.1 c |
| % Lean mass | 59.5 ± 0.7 | 59.5 ± 1.0 | 54.1 ± 0.6 ab | 62. ± 1.0 c |
| Plasma NEFA (mEq/l) | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1ab | 0.5 ± 0.2 c |
| Plasma Insulin (pM) | 107.3 ± 5.9 | 104.4 ± 10.6 | 210.4 ± 3.8 ab | 94.7 ± 2.2 c |
| Plasma C-peptide (pM) | 696.7 ± 20.0 | 701.8 ± 11.4 | 1065 ± 32.1 ab | 690.3 ± 1.7 c |
| C-peptide/Insulin | 6.9 ± 0.6 | 7.4 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.2 ab | 7.3 ± 0.2 c |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) | 116 ± 6 | 120 ± 9 | 157 ± 7 ab | 120 ± 5 c |
| Fed blood glucose (mg/dl) | 116 ± 1 | 122 ± 8 | 171 ± 5 ab | 114 ± 1 c |
| Hepatic triglycerides (μg/mg) | 95.5 ± 3.6 | 76.0 ± 5.5 | 169.6 ± 30.5 ab | 82.3 ± 3.5 c |
| Plasma triglycerides (mg/dl) | 52.2 ± 0.9 | 47.7 ± 1.2 | 45.7 ± 0.9 | 43.7 ± 2.7 |
| Hepatic total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 81.2 ± 4.0 | 82.4 ± 2.5 | 84 ± 2.8 | 79.2 ± 4.4 |
Male mice were fed a HF or kept on RD diet for 3 months starting at 3 months of age (n≥5–8 mice/genotype/feeding group). Retro-orbital blood and tissues were collected at 11:00 a.m. following an overnight fast. Steady-state-C-peptide/insulin was calculated as a measure of insulin clearance. Values are expressed as mean±SEM.
P<0.05 vs Cc1+/+
P<0.05 vs L-CC1
P<0.05 vs Cc1−/−.
3.2. Liver-specific reconstitution of CEACAM1 reversed diet-induced hepatic steatosis in null mice
Histological analysis of H&E-stained liver sections revealed diffuse microvesicular lipid droplets in the liver parenchyma of RD-fed Cc1−/− mice (Fig. 2A.iii) and a mixture of micro- and macrovesicular lipid deposits when fed HF (Fig. 2A.vii). This was supported by increased hepatic triglyceride without changes in total cholesterol levels (Table 1). Hepatic CEACAM1 restoration curbed lipid accumulation in RD- and HF-fed Cc1−/−xliver+ mice (Fig. 2A.iv vs iii; viii vs vii), also evidenced by its ~1.5-to-2-fold lowering effect on total hepatic triglyceride levels (Table 1). Increased hepatic lipid accumulation in RD-fed and HF-fed Cc1−/− mice relative to Cc1+/+ and L-CC1 controls stemmed from the combined effect of enhanced fatty acid transport (high Cd36 mRNA) in RD-fed (Table S3) and HF-fed null livers (Table S4); increased de novo lipogenesis [as demonstrated by higher fatty acid synthase (FASN) activity (Fig. 2B.i)] and reduced fatty acid β-oxidation (Fig. 2B.ii). Elevated FASN activity in Cc1−/− livers could stem from increased hyperinsulinemia-driven transcriptional upregulation by SREBP-1c (Table S3–S4). Reduced hepatic fatty acid β-oxidation (Fig. 2B.ii) was consistent with the ~2-fold lower Fgf21 mRNA levels in RD-fed and HF-fed Cc1−/− mice relative to controls (Table S3–S4). Liver-specific CEACAM1 reconstitution attenuated lipogenesis as indicated by reversed Cd36 and Fasn mRNA levels (Table S3–S4) and normalized FASN activity (Fig. 2B.i) in response to both diets. It also induced hepatic fatty acid β-oxidation under both feeding conditions (Fig. 2B.ii), in part related to recovering Fgf21 expression levels (Table S3–S4, Cc1−/−xliver+ vs Cc1−/−). This demonstrated that reconstituting hepatic CEACAM1 blunted steatosis by reducing de novo lipogenesis and increasing fatty acid β-oxidation in Cc1−/−xliver+ livers. Furthermore, it limited substrate redistribution to WAT and subsequently, visceral adiposity, lipolysis and NEFA transport to the liver.
Fig. 2.

Histological and biochemical analysis. Livers of 6-month-old mice (n≥5/genotype) were extracted and sectioned for (A) H&E staining to detect inflammatory foci (yellow arrows) and microvesicular lipid droplets. Representative images are shown. (B) Hepatic fatty acid synthase (FASN) activity (panel i) and hepatic palmitate oxidation (panel ii) were assayed in overnight fasted RD-fed (upper graphs) and HF-fed mice (lower graphs). Assays were performed in triplicate. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. aP<0.05 vs Cc1+/+; bP<0.05 vs L-CC1; and cP<0.05 vs Cc1−/−. (C) Western blot analysis was performed on liver lysates by immunoblotting (Ib) with antibodies against phosphorylated signaling proteins (α-pNF-κB, α-pStat3, α-peNOS, α-pPKCζ) normalized against their non-phosphorylated counterparts immunodetected on parallel gels. Numbers to the right of the gels indicate apparent molecular mass (kDa). Gels represent 2 experiments performed on 2 different mice/genotype. (D) Tunnel staining on liver sections to detect apoptotic bodies(yellow arrows) in RD-fed and HF-fed mice. Representative images are shown. CHOP protein was detected by immunoblotting with α-CHOP antibody normalized against total protein (α-Tubulin) loaded on parallel gel. Numbers to the right of the gels indicate apparent molecular mass (kDa). Gels represent 2 experiments performed on different mice/genotype.
3.3. Liver-specific rescuing of CEACAM1 reversed diet-induced hepatic inflammation in null mice
H&E staining revealed a few inflammatory infiltrates in RD-fed Cc1−/− livers with no significant change in hepatocellular architecture (Fig. 2A.iii). Consistent with lipotoxicity-driven inflammation, HF feeding increased perivascular and lobular inflammatory cell infiltrates in Cc1−/− livers by comparison to Cc1+/+ and L-CC1 controls (Fig. 2A.vii). Liver-specific rescuing of CEACAM1 markedly curbed this inflammatory response to HF diet (Fig. 2A.viii vs vii, Table 3).
Table 3.
NAFLD activity score (NAS)
| Group | Diet | Mice/number | Steatosis | Inflammation | Ballooning | Total NAS | NASH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micro/ macro (0–3) | Lobular (0–3) | Portal (0–3) | Hepatocyte (0–2) | Score (0–8) | ||||
| Cc1+/+ | RD | >3 | 0 | ≤ 1 | 0 | 0 | ≤ 1 | No |
| Cc1+/+ | HF | >3 | 2 | ≤ 2 | 0 | 0 | ≤ 4 | No |
| L-CC1 | RD | >4 | 0 | ≤ 1 | 0 | 0 | ≤ 1 | No |
| L-CC1 | HF | >3 | 2 | ≤ 2 | 0 | 0 | ≤ 4 | No |
| Cc1−/− | RD | >3 | ≤ 2 | 1 | ≤ 1 | 0 | ≤ 4 | No |
| Cc1−/− | HF | >3 | 3 | 2 | ≤ 2 | 0 | ≤ 7 | YES |
| Cc1−/−xliver+ | RD | >3 | 0 | ≤ 1 | 0 | 0 | ≤ 1 | No |
| Cc1−/−xliver+ | HF | >3 | 2 | ≤ 2 | 0 | 0 | ≤ 4 | No |
Male mice were fed a HF or kept on RD diet for 5 months starting at 3 months of age (n≥3–6 mice/genotype/feeding group). NAS score was evaluated based on NIH guidelines. Score did not significantly change after nicotinic acid treatment.
qRT-PCR analysis showed elevated total (F4/80) and activated (Cd68) macrophage pool, and neutrophil levels (Mpo, Elastase) in livers of null relative to controls fed RD or HF (Table S3–S4). Null livers also manifested higher mRNA of pro-inflammatory CD+4 and CD+8 T-lymphocytes with no increase in anti-inflammatory Treg pools (Foxp3; lL-10) (Table S3–S4). Higher hepatic Ifnγ, but not Il-4 and Il-13 mRNA levels in RD- and HF-fed null livers (Table S3–S4), indicated a CD4+Th1 response. This pro-inflammatory state was marked by the activation of hepatic NF-κB in these mice (assessed by immunoblotting liver lysates with α-phosphoNF-κB normalized to loaded NF-κB, Fig. 2C). NF-κB induced the transcription of its targets, including pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Tnfα, Il-1β, and Il-6 (Table S3–S4), followed by their release, as manifested by elevated plasma TNFα and IL-6 levels (Table 2). IL-6 could, in turn, activate Stat3-mediated pro-inflammatory pathways (Fig. 2C) to synergize with TNFα activation of NF-κB to induce mRNA levels of Mcp-1/Ccl2 in monocytes/macrophages (Table S3–S4) and amplify their migration. Stat3 activation also represses interferon regulatory factor-8 (Irf-8) expression to upregulate the expression of Cd11b+ macrophages and granulocytes (Gr1 mRNA) (Table S3–S4) [28–30], thereby sustaining a pro-inflammatory state under both feeding conditions. Interestingly, liver-specific reconstitution of CEACAM1 reversed NF-κB and Stat3 activation (Fig. 2C), the rise in plasma TNFα and IL-6 (Table 2) and in the mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Table S3–S4) under both feeding conditions. This lends further support to the critical role of hepatic CEACAM1 in regulating the inflammatory milieu of the liver [20].
Table 2.
Plasma and tissue biochemistry
| Cc1+/+ | L-CC1 | Cc1−/− | Cc1−/−xliver+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a) RD | ||||
| Plasma TNFα (pg/ml) | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 9.0 ± 0.1 ab | 4.5 ± 0.3 c |
| Plasma IL-6 (pg/ml) | 34.6 ± 1.4 | 34.0 ± 0.7 | 57.1 ± 2.1 ab | 33.8 ± 1.0 c |
| Plasma AST (mU/ml) | 44.7 ± 5.2 | 36.7 ± 6.4 | 87.7 ± 5.0 ab | 48.9 ± 7.5 c |
| Plasma ALT (mU/ml) | 7.7 ± 1.2 | 8.2 ± 1.0 | 14.8 ± 0.5 ab | 9.3 ± 1.5 c |
| Hepatic NO (uM/ugx 10−1) | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 ab | 3.0 ± 0.0 c |
| Hepatic GSH (umol/g wt) | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 1.7 ± 0.0 |
| Plasma ET-1 (pg/ml) | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.8 | 11.7 ± 0.4 ab | 4.6 ± 0.5 c |
| b) HF | ||||
| Plasma TNFα (pg/ml) | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 9.7 ± 0.3 ab | 4.9 ± 0.2 c |
| Plasma IL-6 (pg/ml) | 40.3 ± 1.3 | 39.8 ± 3.2 | 63.7 ± 1.7 ab | 36.0 ± 2.5 c |
| Plasma AST (mU/ml) | 77.6 ± 8.2 | 70.2 ± 9.6 | 135.7 ± 17.0 ab | 58.9 ± 10.1 c |
| Plasma ALT (mU/ml) | 16.8 ± 2.4 | 15.1 ± 1.6 | 27.0 ± 2.5 ab | 13.4 ± 2.5 c |
| Hepatic NO (uM/ugx10−1) | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 ab | 5.0 ± 0.0 c |
| Hepatic GSH (umol/g wt) | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.0 ab | 4.3 ± 0.2 c |
| Plasma ET-1 (pg/ml) | 15.6 ± 2.1 | 15.2 ± 2.4 | 33.7 ± 3.4 ab | 13.6 ± 3.6 c |
Male mice were fed a HF or kept on RD diet for 3 months starting at 3 months of age (n≥5–8 mice/genotype/feeding group). Retro-orbital blood and tissues were collected at 11:00 a.m. following an overnight fast. Values are expressed as mean±SEM.
P<0.05 vs Cc1+/+
P<0.05 vs L-CC1
P<0.05 vs Cc1−/−.
In addition, HF amplified the activation of macrophages (F4/80, Cd68) and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Tnfα, Il-1β; Il-6) in WAT of null mice (Table S5). This could promote a pro-inflammatory state (elevated plasma TNFα and IL-6) which synergized with increased NEFA release to cause systemic insulin resistance in Cc1−/− mice compared to controls [31]. Liver-specific CEACAM1 reconstitution reversed this inflammatory response in WAT in mice fed either diet (Table S5, Cc1−/−xliver+ vs Cc1−/−).
3.4. Liver-specific redelivery of CEACAM1 in null mice reversed apoptosis, hepatic injury, and oxidative stress caused by high-fat diet
RD-fed and HF-fed Cc1−/− mice manifested liver dysfunction as assessed by their ~2-fold higher plasma alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels relative to controls (Table 2). Liver-specific CEACAM1 reconstitution normalized plasma ALT and AST levels and restored liver function (Table 2).
Apoptosis contributes to cell injury and liver dysfunction. Consistently, Tunel staining detected apoptotic cells in HF-fed null, but not control livers (Fig. 2D.vii). Moreover, mRNA level of Chop, an apoptosis marker, was induced by ~3-fold in HF-fed, but not in RD-fed Cc1−/− livers (Table S4–S3). This translated into higher hepatic CHOP protein content in HF-fed, but not RD-fed Cc1−/− mice (Fig. 2D). Together with the ~4-fold decrease in the expression of the anti-apoptosis Bcl2 gene in HF-fed nulls (Table S4), this pointed to the apoptosis-inducing effect of HF in null livers. qRT-PCR analysis revealed an ~2-to-3-fold increase in the expression of hepatic injury markers (Hgf, Nqo1, Nrf1) in RD-fed and HF-fed Cc1−/− livers (Table S3–S4).
Consistent with oxidative stress contributing to hepatocyte dysfunction [6], hepatic mRNA levels of NADPH oxidase (Nox1, Nox4) were elevated (Table S3–S4) and hepatic nitric oxide (NO) levels were lower in RD-fed and HF-fed nulls as compared to controls (Table 2), likely due to compromised activation of Akt/eNOS pathway in null livers [36] and as manifested by reduced basal eNOS phosphorylation (Fig. 2C). Additionally, RD-fed Cc1−/− livers manifested normal mRNA levels of Cyp2E1, a cytochrome p450 enzyme involved in the metabolism of long-chain fatty acids (lipooxygenation) and microsomal lipid ω-peroxidation (Table S3). HF induced Cyp2E1 mRNA by ~2-fold in Cc1−/−, but not control livers (Table S4 vs S3), possibly by activating NF-κB pathways [32]. Moreover, HF lowered Npc1 mRNA in null livers by ~50%, contributing to reduced GSH levels (Table 2) and subsequently, increased response to the cytotoxic effect of elevated TNFα levels in null mice [33], which could in turn, activate IKK-β, a redox-sensitive kinase that upregulates NF-κB–dependent proinflammatory pathways [34]. In addition, HF, but not RD intake, induced PKCζ activation (phosphorylation) in null but not control mice (Fig. 2C). In light of PKCζ activation of NF-κB [35], its preferential phosphorylation in HF-fed nulls could contribute to diet-induced nitroso-redox imbalance and hepatocyte injury in null livers.
Liver-specific CEACAM1 reconstituted restored liver function even in response to HF (assessed by normalizing ALT and AST levels, Table 2). It reversed HF-induced apoptosis in Cc1−/−xliver+ mice [reducing tunel stained cells, restoring Bcl2 and Chop expression (Table S3) and normalizing CHOP protein content (Fig. 2D)]. It also prevented oxidative stress and liver injury in RD-fed and HF-fed nulls (Cc1−/−xliver+ vs Cc1−/− mice), as evidenced by normalized hepatic mRNA levels of Nox1 and Nox4 (Table S3–S4), and hepatic NO levels (Table 2); likely resulting from restored eNOS activation (phosphorylation) (Fig. 2C). This assigns a major role for hepatic CEACAM1-dependent pathways in protecting against diet-induced hepatocyte injury and apoptosis.
3.5. Liver-specific reconstitution of CEACAM1 protected against fibrosis in null mice
As reported [22], Sirius red staining showed spontaneous and diet-amplified interstitial chicken-wire pattern of collagen deposition in Cc1−/− mice (Fig. 3A and accompanying table). These pathologies were reversed to control basal levels upon exclusive hepatic CEACAM1 rescuing (Fig. 3A.iv vs iii, viii vs vii-Table). Consistently, mRNA levels of pro-fibrogenic genes (Tgfβ, α-Sma, Ctgf) (Fig. 3B) and the protein content of α-SMA (Fig. 3C) were ≥2-fold higher in null livers relative to controls under both feeding conditions. This was mediated by TGFβ-Smad2/3 activation, as indicated by increased Smad2/3 phosphorylation (Fig. 3C) and by the ~3-to-4–fold decrease in the mRNA (Table S3–S4) and protein (Fig. 3C) levels of TGFβ-Smad2/3 inhibitor, Smad7, arising from elevated plasma and hepatic TNFα levels [36]. Liver-specific CEACAM1 rescuing reversed fibrosis caused by global Ceacam1 null deletion even in HF-fed mice (Fig. 3A.iv and viii). This was mediated by inactivating TGFβ-Smad2/3 [blunted Smad2/3 phosphorylation (Fig. 3C) and restored hepatic Smad7 mRNA (Table S3–S4) and protein levels (Fig. 3C) in parallel to TNFα normalization].
Fig. 3.

Analysis of of hepatic fibrosis. Mice were fed RD or HF for 3 months (n≥5/genotype/feeding group). (A) Sirius red staining on liver sections was performed to detect interstitial collagen deposition in the parenchyma of Cc1−/− mice. Representative images are shown. Fibrosis scoring was evaluated by Brunt criteria in the accompanying table. (B) mRNA analysis of fibrotic markers in liver tissues from of RD or HF-fed mice normalized to Gapdh (RD) or 18S (HF). Values are expressed as means ± SEM. aP<0.05 vs Cc1+/+; bP<0.05 vs L-CC1; and cP<0.05 vs Cc1−/−. (C) Western blot analysis was performed on liver lysates by immunoblotting (Ib) with antibodies against phosphorylated signaling proteins (α-pSmad2, α-pSmad3) normalized against their non-phosphorylated counterparts immunodetected on parallel gels. Smad7 and SMA proteins were detected by immunoblotting with α-Smad7 or α-SMA antibodies normalized against Tubulin on parallel gels. Gels represent more than 2 experiments performed on different mice/genotype.
As previously reported [37], Cc1−/− mice exhibited an increase in plasma endothelin-1 (Et-1) levels by 2-to-4–fold irrespective of the diet (Table 2), likely resulting from hyperinsulinemia [38], as evidenced by its reversal in Cc1−/−xliver+ mice (Table 2). Hepatic mRNA levels of ET-1 and of its receptor A (Etar) that mediates its pro-fibrogenic activity (Fig. 3B) were elevated in Cc1−/− but not Cc1−/−xliver+ mice. Mechanistically, this could be mediated by NF-κB activation, which in the presence of low NO levels and oxidative stress, could also induce the transcription of the pro-fibrogenic platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B) directly or indirectly by activating HIF-1α [39, 40], as manifested by their higher hepatic expression in null mice (Fig. 3B). Liver-specific rescuing of CEACAM1 normalized plasma (Table 2) and hepatic ET-1 and PDGF-B mRNA levels (Fig. 3B) via inactivating NF-κB and HIF-1α pathways in the normoinsulinemic (Fig. 2C–3C) and normoglycemic Cc1−/−xliver+ mice.
HF feeding for 5 months caused similar molecular and histopathologic anomalies to 3 months of high-fat intake. Pertinent analyses are summarized through evaluating NAFLD activity score (NAS) per NIH guidelines (Table 3). As shown, RD-fed Cc1−/− mice did not exhibit the full spectrum of NASH even at 8 months of age (NAS<4). In contrast, HF feeding for 5 months caused a NAS score of >7 in nulls (Table 3). Liver-specific CEACAM1 rescuing restored NAS to <4 even after 5 months of HF and protected against NASH (Table 3).
3.7. Nicotinic acid treatment demonstrated a limited role for lipolysis in the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis in HF-fed Ceacam1 nulls
We next treated mice with nicotinic acid (NA) at the end of 5 months of HF feeding to reverse plasma NEFA (Fig. 4A) and adipokines (examplified by IL-6; Fig. 4B) in Cc1−/− by comparison to vehicle (Veh) treatment. Like in RD-fed Cc1−/− mice [25], NA did not reverse hyperinsulinemia (Fig. 4C) or insulin resistance (Fig. 4D) in HF-fed Cc1−/− mice, as expected from the loss of hepatic Ceacam1 expression (Table S6). Accordingly, NA did not reverse diet-induced macrovesicular steatosis (Fig. 4E.iii) or mRNA levels of Srebp-1c in null livers (Fig. 4G). Consistent with lipolysis-derived NEFA driving fatty acid β-oxidation [41], NA normalized Cpt1 mRNA levels in null mice (Fig. 4G). Loss of macrosteatosis in HF-fed NA-treated Cc1−/−xliver+ mice (Fig. 4G.iv vs iii) demonstrated that macrosteatosis in HF-fed Cc1−/− mice stemmed primarily from hepatic loss of CEACAM1.
Fig. 4.

The effect of nicotinic acid on hepatic fibrosis. 3-month-old male mice were fed a HF diet for 5 months. (A) HF-fed mice were treated with vehicle (Veh) or once daily injection of nicotinic acid (NA) for 2 days before mice were sacrificed and blood and tissues were collected (n≥4 mice/genotype/treatment). Plasma (A) NEFA, (B) IL-6 and (C) insulin were measured in duplicate. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. aP<0.05 vs Cc1+/+; bP<0.05 vs L-CC1; and cP<0.05 vs Cc1−/−. (D) intraperitoneal Insulin tolerance test was used to assess insulin response, as in the legend to Fig. 1. *P<0.05 vs Cc1−/−. (E) Livers of HF-fed NA-treated mice were sectioned for H&E staining to detect macrovesicular steatosis and inflammation (yellow arrows). Representative images are shown. (F) Sirius red staining of liver sections was used to detect collagen deposition in the parenchyma of mice. Representative images are shown. (G) mRNA analysis of representative genes involved in lipid metabolism, fibrosis, and inflammation in HF-fed NA-treated livers normalized to 18S. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. aP<0.05 vs Cc1+/+; bP<0.05 vs L-CC1; and cP<0.05 vs Cc1−/−. (H) Western blot analysis was performed on liver lysates as in the legend to Fig. 3.
Despite normalization of plasma cytokines by NA (Fig. 4B), mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory genes (Cd68, Tnfα, Il-1β, Il-6) remained elevated in NA-treated HF-fed null livers (Fig. 4G), resulting from NF-κB activation (Fig. 4H). Moreover, histopathological evaluation detected sustained robust lobular/portal inflammatory infiltration in HF-fed NA-treated null livers relative to other groups (Fig. 4E). Together with a steatosis score of 3, this maintained a NAS score of >7 in HF-fed NA-treated null mice (which was normalized to a NAS score of <4 in Cc1−/−xliver mice).
Sirius red staining showed persistent interstitial chicken-wire pattern of collagen deposition in HF-fed NA-treated Cc1−/− mice that was reversed by liver-specific CEACAM1 rescuing (Fig. 4F.iv vs iii, Brunt score of 1 vs 3). This was supported by sustained elevated expression of pro-fibrogenic genes (α-Sma, Et-1, Pdgf-B) (Fig. 4G) and the protein content of α-SMA (Fig.4H) in Cc1−/− versus Cc1−/−xliver+ livers. Hepatic fibrosis in HF-fed NA-treated nulls was mediated by activation (phosphorylation) of TGFβ-Smad2/3 pathway, in turn upregulated by Smad7 loss (Fig. 4H). Reversal of NF-κB–driven hepatic pro-fibrogenic gene expression and TGFβ pathway activation by liver-specific CEACAM1 reconstitution supported the primary role of hepatic CEACAM1 in the pathogenesis of fibrosis in Cc1−/− mice.
4. Discussion
The metabolic and histopathological phenotypes of Cc1−/− [22] and L-SACC1 liver-specific inactive mice [42] provided an in vivo demonstration of the mechanistic underpinning of NASH. The causal role of impaired insulin clearance in insulin resistance and NAFLD was best manifested by the gradual progression of metabolic dysregulation in the liver-specific AlbCre+Cc1fl/fl null. This mouse developed impaired insulin clearance and chronic hyperinsulinemia at 2 months of age, followed by hepatic insulin resistance and steatosis. This increased substrate redistribution to WAT and subsequently, visceral obesity, lipolysis and systemic insulin resistance at 9 months of age [17]. Consistent with elevated pro-inflammatory response to steatosis, Ceacam1 mutants developed spontaneous steatohepatitis [20, 23, 42]. In support of the well-documented role of inflammation in hepatocellular injury [43] and of the metabolic and immune regulation of liver function by CEACAM1 [24], they also developed oxidative stress and low-grade fibrosis that progressed into severe fibrosis when fed a HF diet [22, 42]. In contrast, the liver-specific gain-of-function model used in the current studies exhibited not only a reversal of the severe metabolic derangement amplified by prolonged HF intake in Cc1−/− mice, but also reversal of advanced hepatic fibrosis. Persistence of hepatic fibrosis in HF-diet nulls treated with nicotinic acid demonstrated that progressive fibrosis in Cc1−/− mice is primarily caused by the loss of hepatic CEACAM1 and that adipocytes-derived NEFA and adipokines did not contribute significantly to this phenotype. This provided an in vivo manifest of how the loss of hepatic CEACAM1 mediates, not only insulin resistance [25], and subsequently, steatosis-to-NAFLD switch, but also NASH escalation, including advanced fibrosis and apoptosis caused by HF intake.
As in L-SACC1 mutants [42], HF induced lipid peroxidation in Cc1−/− but not wild-type mice. This HF-induced nitroso-redox imbalance could initiate peroxidative events commonly associated with necrotic damage and apoptosis in null livers [1, 44]. This could be triggered in part by inducing hepatic TNFα [45] and amplifying its cytotoxic effect through the compromised GSH-based mitochondrial defense system associated with lower NPC1 and possible partitioning of free-cholesterol to mitochondria in Cc1−/− [44], as was shown for L-SACC1 mice [42]. Reversal of this phenotype by liver-specific reintroduction of CEACAM1 further underscored the role of CEACAM1 loss in the pathogenesis of oxidative stress and inflammation commonly implicated in NASH [3, 6, 28].
Fibrosis in Cc1−/− mice was mediated by activated TGFβ-Smad2/3 canonical pathways and driven by increased production of ET-1 and PDGF-B, two key pro-fibrogenic effectors. Increased levels of ET-1 could result from hyperinsulinemia [38], as supported by its normalization upon restoring normoinsulinemia and insulin sensitivity in Cc1−/−xliver+ mice. As previously shown, Akt/eNOS-dependent NO synthesis was repressed in Cc1−/− vascular endothelium as a result of hyperinsulinemia-driven downregulation of insulin receptors [37]. The increase in ET-1 in the presence of low NO could result from NF-κB activation directly or indirectly via HIF-1α [39]. This could tip the vasomotor balance towards vasoconstriction, which could activate hepatic stellate cells to cause fibrosis [46].
Activated NF-κB (alone or jointly with HIF-1α) could induce PDGF-B transcription [39, 40]. Consistent with PKC inducing PDGF-B expression in fasting hyperglycemia [47], HF activated PKCζ in Cc1−/−, but not control mice in parallel to increasing their lipid peroxidation. Elevated PDGF-B could synergize with ET-1 to induce collagen production by triggering proliferation of stellate cells [46]. Normalizing ET-1 and PDGF-B by curbing inflammation and oxidative stress in mice with liver-specific CEACAM1 redelivery prevented fibrosis. Reversal of NASH in Cc1−/− upon restoring their hepatic CEACAM1 expression emphasized the key role of hepatic CEACAM1 in maintaining normal liver architecture and function even under conditions of excess energy supply, and not just their insulin sensitivity.
5. Strengths and weaknesses
Contrary to recent reports showing a critical role for adipocytes-derived effectors in hepatic fibrosis in humans [48], the current studies showed that blocking lipolysis and adipokines release from adipose tissue did not limit hepatic fibrosis in Cc1−/− mice. Nevertheless, the current studies identified hepatic CEACAM1 as a defense system against diet-induced liver fibrosis, as previously shown for WAT fibrosis [49]. In support of these findings, liver grafts with low CEACAM1 manifested an increase in ischemia-reperfusion injury inflammation and decreased function in wild-type recipient mice and caused post-reperfusion damage in liver transplant human recipients [50]. Interestingly, PPARγ and GLP-1 receptor agonists that are used to treat insulin-resistant NAFLD patients [9, 10] with advanced fibrosis [51] induce Ceacam1 transcription [52]. Thus, it is likely that the effectiveness of these drugs is mediated partly by their positive effect on CEACAM1 expression. Thus, inducing hepatic CEACAM1 expression could constitute an efficacious targeted therapeutical approach not only to curb insulin resistance and NAFLD, but also to prevent or reverse fibrosis without causing the body weight gain often observed in patients treated with PPARγ agonists. Drug development followed by clinical studies are needed to test this postulation.
6. Conclusions
The current studies demonstrated that liver-specific reconstitution of CEACAM1 in Cc1−/− nulls reversed hyperinsulinemia-driven histopathological features of NASH and prevented hepatic fibrosis and dysfunction. This proposes that targeting CEACAM1 could constitute a novel therapeutic approach against NASH and its esacalation to end-stage liver disease.
Supplementary Material
HIGHLIGHTS.
Hepatic fibrosis in Cc1−/− mice is primarily caused by loss of hepatic CEACAM1
Fibrosis is mediated by activated NF-kB–triggered fibrogenic gene transcription
Liver-specific reconstitution of CEACAM1 reverses NAFLD/NASH in HF-fed Cc1−/− mice
Liver-specific reconstitution of CEACAM1 reverses fibrosis in HF-fed Cc1−/− mice
Liver-specific reconstitution of CEACAM1 restores liver function in HF-fed Cc1−/− mice
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ms Julie Buckley at the Ohio University Histopathology Facility for her technical assistance in histological analysis and staining. They also thank Dr. Amal K. Najjar, visiting Fulbright Scholar, for critical reading of the manuscript.
Financial support:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grants: R01-HL112248, R01-DK054254, R01-DK083850 and R01DK124126 to S.M.N]. The work was also partly supported by the Middle East Diabetes Research Center to H.E.G.
NON-STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
- CEACAM1
Carcinoembryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule 1
- Ceacam1 (Cc1)
Gene encoding CEACAM1 protein
- Cc1
Ceacam1 gene
- Cc1−/−
Global Ceacam1 homozygous null mutant mice
- L-CC1
Wild-type mice with forced liver-specific overexpression of rat Ceacam1 transgene driven by Apolipoprotein A1 promoter
- Cc1−/−xliver+
Cc1−/− mice with transgenic liver-specific reconstitution of rat Ceacam1 transgene
- ET-1
Endothelin-1
- ETAR/ETBR
Endothelin-1 Receptor-A/B isoforms
- GSH
Reduced glutathione
- HF
High-fat diet
- HIF-1α
Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha
- IL-6
Interleukin-6
- NEFA
Non-esterified fatty acids
- NA
Nicotinic acid
- NO
Nitric oxide
- NPC1
Niemann Pick type C1
- PDGF-B
Platelet-derived growth factor-B
- RD
Regular chow diet
- TGFβ
Transforming growth factor beta
- TNFα
Tumor necrosis factor alpha
- WAT
White adipose tissue
Footnotes
Conflict of interest/Financial disclosure: None declared
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- [1].Buzzetti E, Pinzani M, Tsochatzis EA. The multiple-hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Metabolism. 2016;65:1038–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Younossi ZM. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - A global public health perspective. J Hepatol. 2019;70:531–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Tilg H, Moschen AR. Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology. 2010;52:1836–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Gan LT, Van Rooyen DM, Koina ME, McCuskey RS, Teoh NC, Farrell GC. Hepatocyte free cholesterol lipotoxicity results from JNK1-mediated mitochondrial injury and is HMGB1 and TLR4-dependent. J Hepatol. 2014;61:1376–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Fuchs M, Sanyal AJ. Lipotoxicity in NASH. J Hepatol. 2012;56:291–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Dallio M, Sangineto M, Romeo M, Villani R, Romano AD, Loguercio C, et al. Immunity as Cornerstone of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Contribution of Oxidative Stress in the Disease Progression. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Masarone M, Rosato V, Dallio M, Gravina AG, Aglitti A, Loguercio C, et al. Role of Oxidative Stress in Pathophysiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:9547613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Thomas DD, Corkey BE, Istfan NW, Apovian CM. Hyperinsulinemia: An Early Indicator of Metabolic Dysfunction. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3:1727–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Gastaldelli A, Cusi K. From NASH to diabetes and from diabetes to NASH: Mechanisms and treatment options. JHEP Rep. 2019;1:312–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Stefan N, Haring HU, Cusi K. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: causes, diagnosis, cardiometabolic consequences, and treatment strategies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:313–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Bril F, Lomonaco R, Orsak B, Ortiz-Lopez C, Webb A, Tio F, et al. Relationship between disease severity, hyperinsulinemia, and impaired insulin clearance in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2014;59:2178–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Heinrich G, Muturi HT, Rezaei K, Al-Share QY, DeAngelis AM, Bowman TA, et al. Reduced hepatic carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 level in obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017;8:54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Lee W The CEACAM1 expression is decreased in the liver of severely obese patients with or without diabetes. Diagn Pathol. 2011;6:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Najjar SM, Perdomo G. Hepatic Insulin Clearance: Mechanism and Physiology. Physiology (Bethesda). 2019;34:198–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Xu E, Dubois MJ, Leung N, Charbonneau A, Turbide C, Avramoglu RK, et al. Targeted disruption of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 promotes diet-induced hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Endocrinology. 2009;150:3503–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].DeAngelis AM, Heinrich G, Dai T, Bowman TA, Patel PR, Lee SJ, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1: a link between insulin and lipid metabolism. Diabetes. 2008;57:2296–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Ghadieh HE, Russo L, Muturi HT, Ghanem SS, Manaserh IH, Noh HL, et al. Hyperinsulinemia drives hepatic insulin resistance in male mice with liver-specific Ceacam1 deletion independently of lipolysis. Metabolism. 2019;93:33–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Poy MN, Yang Y, Rezaei K, Fernstrom MA, Lee AD, Kido Y, et al. CEACAM1 regulates insulin clearance in liver. Nat Genet. 2002;30:270–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Najjar SM, Yang Y, Fernstrom MA, Lee SJ, Deangelis AM, Rjaily GA, et al. Insulin acutely decreases hepatic fatty acid synthase activity. Cell Metab. 2005;2:43–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Najjar SM, Russo L. CEACAM1 loss links inflammation to insulin resistance in obesity and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Semin Immunopathol. 2014;36:55–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Najjar SM, Ledford KJ, Abdallah SL, Paus A, Russo L, Kaw MK, et al. Ceacam1 deletion causes vascular alterations in large vessels. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305:E519–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Ghosh S, Kaw M, Patel PR, Ledford KJ, Bowman TA, McLnerney MF, et al. Mice with null mutation of Ceacam I develop nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepat Med: Res Evidence. 2010;2010:69–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Ghadieh HE, Abu Helal R, Muturi HT, Issa DD, Russo L, Abdallah SL, et al. Loss of Hepatic Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Related Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 Links Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis to Atherosclerosis. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4:1591–609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Horst AK, Najjar SM, Wagener C, Tiegs G. CEACAM1 in Liver Injury, Metabolic and Immune Regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Russo L, Muturi HT, Ghadieh HE, Ghanem SS, Bowman TA, Noh HL, et al. Liver-specific reconstitution of CEACAM1 reverses the metabolic abnormalities caused by its global deletion in male mice. Diabetologia. 2017;60:2463–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Al-Share QY, DeAngelis AM, Lester SG, Bowman TA, Ramakrishnan SK, Abdallah SL, et al. Forced Hepatic Overexpression of CEACAM1 Curtails Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance. Diabetes. 2015;64:2780–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Santiago-Rolon A, Purcell D, Rosado K, Toro DH. A Comparison of Brunt’s Criteria, the Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS), and a Proposed NAS Scoring that Includes Fibrosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Staging. Puerto Rico Health Sci J. 2015;34:189–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Tacke F, Zimmermann HW. Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2014;60:1090–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Adelaja A, Hoffmann A. Signaling Crosstalk Mechanisms That May Fine-Tune Pathogen-Responsive NFkappaB. Front Immunol. 2019;10:433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Suryavanshi SV, Kulkarni YA. NF-kappabeta: A Potential Target in the Management of Vascular Complications of Diabetes. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Gregor MF, Hotamisligil GS. Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity. Ann Rev Immunol. 2011;29:415–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Abdel-Razzak Z, Garlatti M, Aggerbeck M, Barouki R. Determination of interleukin-4-responsive region in the human cytochrome P450 2E1 gene promoter. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68:1371–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Mari M, Caballero F, Colell A, Morales A, Caballeria J, Fernandez A, et al. Mitochondrial free cholesterol loading sensitizes to TNF- and Fas-mediated steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2006;4:185–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Cai D, Yuan M, Frantz DF, Melendez PA, Hansen L, Lee J, et al. Local and systemic insulin resistance resulting from hepatic activation of IKK-beta and NF-kappaB. Nat Med. 2005;11:183–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Manicassamy S, Gupta S, Huang Z, Sun Z. Protein kinase C-theta-mediated signals enhance CD4+ T cell survival by up-regulating Bcl-xL. J Immunol. 2006;176:6709–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Nagarajan RP, Chen F, Li W, Vig E, Harrington MA, Nakshatri H, et al. Repression of transforming-growth-factor-beta-mediated transcription by nuclear factor kappaB. Biochem J. 2000;348 Pt 3:591–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Russo L, Muturi HT, Ghadieh HE, Wisniewski AM, Morgan EE, Quadri SS, et al. Liver-specific rescuing of CEACAM1 reverses endothelial and cardiovascular abnormalities in male mice with null deletion of Ceacam1 gene. Mol Metab. 2018;9:98–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Mahmoud AM, Szczurek MR, Blackburn BK, Mey JT, Chen Z, Robinson AT, et al. Hyperinsulinemia augments endothelin-1 protein expression and impairs vasodilation of human skeletal muscle arterioles. Physiol Rep. 2016;4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].van Uden P, Kenneth NS, Rocha S. Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha by NF-kappaB. Biochem J. 2008;412:477–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Au PY, Martin N, Chau H, Moemeni B, Chia M, Liu FF, et al. The oncogene PDGF-B provides a key switch from cell death to survival induced by TNF. Oncogene. 2005;24:3196–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Titchenell PM, Quinn WJ, Lu M, Chu Q, Lu W, Li C, et al. Direct hepatocyte insulin signaling is required for lipogenesis but is dispensable for the suppression of glucose production. Cell Metab. 2016;23:1154–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Lee SJ, Heinrich G, Fedorova L, Al-Share QY, Ledford KJ, Fernstrom MA, et al. Development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in insulin-resistant liver-specific S503A carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 mutant mice. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:2084–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Wan J, Weiss E, Ben Mkaddem S, Mabire M, Choinier PM, Thibault-Sogorb T, et al. LC3-associated phagocytosis in myeloid cells, a fireman that restrains inflammation and liver fibrosis, via immunoreceptor inhibitory signaling. Autophagy. 2020;16:1526–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M. Cholesterol metabolism and the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Prog Lipid Res. 2013;52:175–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Carter-Kent C, Zein NN, Feldstein AE. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of fatty liver and disease progression to steatohepatitis: implications for treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1036–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1655–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Yokota T, Ma RC, Park JY, Isshiki K, Sotiropoulos KB, Rauniyar RK, et al. Role of protein kinase C on the expression of platelet-derived growth factor and endothelin-1 in the retina of diabetic rats and cultured retinal capillary pericytes. Diabetes. 2003;52:838–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Rosso C, Kazankov K, Younes R, Esmaili S, Marietti M, Sacco M, et al. Crosstalk between adipose tissue insulin resistance and liver macrophages in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2019;71:1012–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Lester SG, Russo L, Ghanem SS, Khuder SS, DeAngelis AM, Esakov EL, et al. Hepatic CEACAM1 over-expression protects against diet-induced fibrosis and inflammation in white adipose tissue. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015;6:116–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Nakamura K, Kageyama S, Kaldas FM, Hirao H, Ito T, Kadono K, et al. Hepatic CEACAM1 expression indicates donor liver quality and prevents early transplantation injury. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:2689–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Musso G, Cassader M, Paschetta E, Gambino R. Pioglitazone for advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: New evidence, new challenges. Hepatology. 2017;65:1058–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Ghadieh HE, Muturi HT, Russo L, Marino CC, Ghanem SS, Khuder SS, et al. Exenatide induces carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 expression to prevent hepatic steatosis. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2:35–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
