Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1984 Jun 1;25(2):250–259. doi: 10.1186/BF03547269

Antimicrobial Residues in Milk. Comparison of Different Agar Diffusion Methods

Antimikrobiella rester i mjölk. Jämförelse mellan olika agar-diffusions metoder.

Anna Haapoja 1,, Hannu Korkeala 1
PMCID: PMC8287430  PMID: 6439018

Abstract

Different agar diffusion methods were compared in order to find a sensitive method for the detection of various antimicrobial residues in milk. A total of 588 producer milk samples were analyzed using subsets of the most sensitive methods.

With the IDF method, 2 positive cases (0.34 %) appeared among the producer milk samples, with the Thermocult method 13 positive cases (2.21 %) and with the Test agar pH 8 method with trimethoprim and glucose 4 positive cases (0.68 %). A combination of the IDF method and the Test agar pH 8 method resulted in 6 positive cases (1.02 %) and a combination of the Thermocult method and the Test agar pH 8 method in 17 positive cases (2.89 %). With penicillinase 41 % of the positive cases were identified as β-lactam antibiotics and with p-aminobenzoic acid 18 % of the positive cases were identified as sulphonamides. 41 % of the positive cases remained unexplained.

The best combination for the detection of antimicrobial agents in milk seems to be that of the Thermocult method and the Test agar pH 8 method with trimethoprim and glucose.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Footnotes

This work was partly supported by the Walter Ehrström Foundation, Helsinki, Finland.

References

  1. Anon.: Maa- ja metsätalousministeriön päätös maitonäytteistä. (The decision of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry concerning milk samples). 1975, No. 453.
  2. Anon.: Maitohygienialiitto 1982, (Association for Milk Hygiene 1982). Maitohygienialiitto, Helsinki 1983, 15 pp.
  3. Barry, A. L.: Procedures for testing antibiotics in agar media: theoretical considerations. In V. Lorian, ed.: Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine. Williams & Wilkins, Raltimore, USA 1980, p. 1–23.
  4. Bogaerts R., de Groodt J. M., de Vos D. An ultra-sensitive microbiological method for the semi-quantitative detection of low-level sulfonamides. J. Food Sci. 1981;46:158–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb14553.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duthie A. H., Woelfel C. G., Nikon K. M., Atherton H. V. Heat-sensitive inhibitor(s) produced in poor quality raw milk. J. Milk Food Technol. 1976;39:774–775. doi: 10.4315/0022-2747-39.11.774. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fabiansson S., Kihlberg C., Rutegård Å., Anderson I. Identifiering av kemoterapeutika i slaktkroppar. (Identification of antimicrobial drugs in slaughter animals) Svensk Vet.-Tidn. 1981;33:7–10. [Google Scholar]
  7. Goudswaard J., Bakkker-de Koff E. C., van Ravenswaaij-Kraan H. P. M. Lysozyme and its presence in bovine milk and serum. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 1978;103:445–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gudding R. An improved bacteriological method for the detection of sulfonamide residues in food. Acta vet. scand. 1976;17:458–464. doi: 10.1186/BF03547901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. International Dairy Federation: Detection of penicillin in milk by disc assay technique. 1970, Int. Stand. FIL-IDF 57, 7 pp.
  10. Jahkola, M.: Mitä lääkärit odottavat eläinlääkärien antibioottien käytöltä. (What do the physicians expect for the veterinary use of antibiotics). In: Proceedings of Veterinary Conference, Finnish Veterinary Association, Helsinki 1983, 259–267.
  11. Korkeala H., Sorvettula O., Mäki-Petäys O., Hirn J. Comparison of different agar diffusion methods for the detection of antimicrobial residues in slaughter animals. Acta vet. scand. 1982;23:407–415. doi: 10.1186/BF03546792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Korkeala H., Sorvettula O., Mäki-Petäys O., Hirn J. Comparison of different agar diffusion methods for the detection of residues in the kidneys of pigs treated with antimicrobial drugs. Meat Science. 1983;9:291–304. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(83)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nouws J. F. M. Microbiological assay methods for sulfonamides in animals tissues, serum and milk. Vet. Quart. 1981;3:136–142. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1981.9693814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pekkanen T. J., Grünwald-Stenius V. Thermocult-pikamenetelmä antibioottisten ja kemoterapeuttisten aineiden osoittamiseksi maidosta. (Thermocult, quick method for detection of antibiotics and chemoterapeutic substances in milk) Suom. EläinlääkLehti. 1974;80:205–211. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pekkanen T. J., Soback S. Heat stable inhibitors produced in raw milk. Nord. Vet.-Med. 1977;29:436–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES