Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2021 Jul 19;59(8):e00913-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00913-21

Endemic SARS-CoV-2 Polymorphisms Can Cause a Higher Diagnostic Target Failure Rate than Estimated by Aggregate Global Sequencing Data

Daniel D Rhoads a,, David Plunkett a, Joy Nakitandwe a, Andrew Dempsey a, Zheng Jin Tu a, Gary W Procop a, David Bosler a, Brian P Rubin a, Michael J Loeffelholz b, Jay E Brock a
Editor: Alexander J McAdamc
PMCID: PMC8288267  PMID: 33972454

LETTER

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to mutate during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and some of the nucleotide polymorphisms may result in diagnostic detection failures. Documented polymorphisms resulting in partial failure of diagnostic assays include g.26340C>T resulting in E gene target failure on the Roche (Indianapolis, IN) cobas 6800/8800 assay (1), g.21765_21770 deletion resulting in S gene target failure (SGTF) on the Thermo Fisher (Carlsbad, CA) TaqPath assay that is associated with the B.1.1.7 and other lineages (2, 3), and g.29200C>W resulting in N gene target failure (NGTF) on the Cepheid Xpert assays (4, 5).

In March 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that SARS-CoV-2 with an N gene point mutation may cause NGTF when using the N2 primers and probes in the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2, Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 DoD, and Xpert Omni SARS-CoV-2 assays (6). NGTF with Xpert has been described in two in vitro reports and associated with translationally silent mutations in the N2 probe region: g.29200C>A and g.29200C>T (4, 5). We investigated the potential for NGTF in contemporary SARS-CoV-2 variants circulating in Northeast Ohio. We report that a synonymous g.29197C>T polymorphism produces NGTF similar to the g.29200C>W polymorphisms, and this g.29197C>T mutation was present in about one-fifth of SARS-CoV-2 genomes that our laboratory has sequenced.

Sixteen unique specimens with SARS-CoV-2 polymorphisms identified near the g.29200 position were selected by convenience sampling and evaluated with Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2. The viral polymorphisms were identified by whole-genome sequencing (COVIDSeq; Illumina, San Diego, CA). These 16 upper respiratory swab specimens were collected in March and April of 2021, and SARS-CoV-2 was detected using standard-of-care testing (e.g., TaqPath, Hologic [Marlborough, MA] Panther, and Roche cobas 8800). These specimens included 3 with g.29194T>C, 11 specimens with g.29197C>T, and 2 specimens with g.29200C>T. All of these polymorphisms are translationally synonymous, and therefore, these changes are not expected to impact the proteins translated by the virus.

The g.29194T>C did not significantly impact target detection as the N2 probe was detected approximately 3 cycles after the E gene probe, which is consistent with assay performance in an unmutated genome (7). The 13 samples with g.29197C>T or g.29200C>T had partial or complete NGTF, resulting in a positive or presumptive positive interpretation, respectively, by the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay. The N2 probe was detected approximately 14 cycles after the E gene probe in six samples, and the N2 probe was undetected in the other seven samples (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Sixteen samples with synonymous mutations investigated for potential N gene target failure using Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2

GISAID accession no. Lineage Clade Ea N2a g.29194T>C g.29197C>T g.29200C>T
EPI_ISL_1575361 B.1.2 20G 25.2 27.9 x
EPI_ISL_1563712 B.1.596 20G 23.3 26.4 x
EPI_ISL_1541185 B.1.596 20G 20 22.7 x
EPI_ISL_1541162 B.1.1.519 20B 26.8 40.9 x
EPI_ISL_1541186 B.1.1 20B 28.6 NDb x
EPI_ISL_1585891 B.1.1.519 20B 28.3 42.1 x
EPI_ISL_1541164 B.1.1.519 20B 26.7 ND x
EPI_ISL_1541187 B.1.1 20B 30.2 43.7 x
EPI_ISL_1541165 B.1.1.519 20B 33.3 ND x
EPI_ISL_1541166 B.1.1.519 20B 27.3 43.7 x
EPI_ISL_1541170 B.1.1.519 20B 16.1 ND x
EPI_ISL_1541171 B.1.1.519 20B 28.4 44.3 x
EPI_ISL_1541172 B.1.1.519 20B 25.7 ND x
EPI_ISL_1541173 B.1.1.519 20B 18.3 ND x
EPI_ISL_1575402 B.1.2 20G 14.8 ND x
EPI_ISL_1575358 B.1.2 20G 27 41.2 x
a

Cycle threshold at which probe fluorescence was detected by PCR.

b

ND, not detected.

In contrast to the global sequencing data in which the g.29197C>T mutation is present in less than 1% of sequences (internal Cepheid data derived from NCBI and GISAID databases), our local SARS-CoV-2 sequencing data identified that the g.29197C>T mutation was frequently encountered. The g.29197C>T was identified in 18% (103/567) of all samples sequenced. Eighteen percent (101/567) of the sequenced samples were selected for sequence analysis due to SGTF identified when using TaqPath in standard-of-care testing, and none of these samples with SGTF contained g.29197C>T. However, g.29197C>T was present in 90% (44/49) of samples from the B.1.1.222 lineage and 100% (52/52) of samples from the B.1.1.519 lineage.

The frequency of variants or synonymous mutations of SARS-CoV-2 often varies with geography. In our locale, we have estimated that approximately 20% of positive specimens may contain a g.29197C>T mutation that decreases the ability of the Xpert assay probe to detect the N2 target, but the E gene target is still detectable. Cepheid is actively engaged in updating its assay to accommodate diversity in the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid gene. Clinical, public health, and research laboratories should consider the potential impact of local genomic variation on the performance of the diagnostic assays in use for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Contributor Information

Daniel D. Rhoads, Email: daniel.rhoads@case.edu.

Alexander J. McAdam, Boston Children’s Hospital

REFERENCES

  • 1.Artesi M, Bontems S, Göbbels P, Franckh M, Maes P, Boreux R, Meex C, Melin P, Hayette MP, Bours V, Durkin K. 2020. A recurrent mutation at position 26340 of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with failure of the E gene quantitative reverse transcription-PCR utilized in a commercial dual-target diagnostic assay. J Clin Microbiol 58:e01598-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01598-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bal A, Destras G, Gaymard A, Stefic K, Marlet J, Eymieux S, Regue H, Semanas Q, d’Aubarede C, Billaud G, Laurent F, Gonzalez C, Mekki Y, Valette M, Bouscambert M, Gaudy-Graffin C, Lina B, Morfin F, Josset L, COVID-Diagnosis HCL Study Group. 2021. Two-step strategy for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 and other variants with spike deletion H69-V70, France, August to December 2020. Euro Surveill 26:2100008. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.3.2100008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown KA, Gubbay J, Hopkins J, Patel S, Buchan SA, Daneman N, Goneau LW. 2021. S-gene target failure as a marker of variant B.1.1.7 among SARS-CoV-2 isolates in the Greater Toronto Area, December 2020 to March 2021. JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hasan MR, Sundararaju S, Manickam C, Mirza F, Al-Hail H, Lorenz S, Tang P. 2021. A novel point mutation in the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 may affect the detection of the virus by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. J Clin Microbiol 59:e03278-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03278-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ziegler K, Steininger P, Ziegler R, Steinmann J, Korn K, Ensser A. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 samples may escape detection because of a single point mutation in the N gene. Euro Surveill 25:2001650. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.39.2001650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.US Food and Drug Administration. 31March2021. SARS-CoV-2 viral mutations: impact on COVID-19 tests. US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/sars-cov-2-viral-mutations-impact-covid-19-tests. Accessed 12 April 2021.
  • 7.Rhoads D, Peaper DR, She RC, Nolte FS, Wojewoda CM, Anderson NW, Pritt BS. 2020. College of American Pathologists (CAP) Microbiology Committee perspective: caution must be used in interpreting the cycle threshold (Ct) value. Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES