Abstract
Background
To address the need for diversifying the biomedical research workforce, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) established the Diversity Program Consortium (DPC) with the goal of developing, implementing, assessing, and disseminating interventions and programs to enhance the participation and persistence of individuals from underrepresented backgrounds in biomedical research careers.
Intervention
As part of the DPC initiative, the NIH funded the National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN), which aimed to increase diversity of the biomedical research workforce through culturally responsive mentorship, networking, and professional development. In 2015, the NRMNet portal was developed to provide a broad-based network of mentors who are accessible to diverse mentees across the country. The portal also provides networking and professional development resources that support mentee transitions from one career stage to the next.
Results
NRMNet is the gateway for career stage-specific mentorship, networking, resources, and professional development programs for trainees across the biomedical, behavioral, clinical, and social sciences. In the first five years, the NRMN strategic recruitment efforts resulted in an expanded network of nearly 13,000 diverse mentors and mentees with NRMN representation in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. Consistently, over the first five years, racial and ethnic diversity was reflected in composition of mentee and mentor groups: 66% of 6,526 mentees and 33% of 3,866 mentors were from underrepresented groups.
Conclusions
The NRMNet portal is a promising effort for enhancing participation and continued engagement of undrerepresented individuals in biomedical research careers by providing culturally responsive mentorship, networking, and professional development for individuals at all career stages.
Keywords: Mentorship, Culturally Responsive, Networking, Professional Development, Biomedical Research, Online Mentoring
Introduction
In a study of barriers to NIH funding, minority investigators reported that inadequate mentoring, lack of institutional support, social, cultural, and environmental factors all posed obstacles to success.1 Mentoring programs for underrepresented minorities (URM, ie, African American, Hispanic/Latinx, American Indian, and Alaska Natives) must address these concerns and create a network of invested mentors committed to advancing careers of URM scientists. Research indicates that URMs receive less mentoring than their non-minority peers.2-4 While a lack of mentoring is not unique to URM faculty, the effect disproportionately impacts this group, especially those in majority/White institutions. Ginther and colleagues have shown that African American researchers receive fewer R01 grants compared with their White peers.2,5 A follow-up article examined possible reasons for the disparity in NIH funding and hypothesized that variability in access to mentoring may be a contributing factor.2,6 While attrition at the faculty level is significant, the gap between the URM and better-served students exists throughout the higher education STEM pathway. Three important factors driving attrition are the lack of: mentors and role models on campus; diverse faculty and students; and professional networking opportunities.7-9 Though the importance of mentoring is recognized universally, there is a dearth of online portals or websites that bring mentoring resources and services under one umbrella, organized to serve each career level with the goal of increasing diversity of the university-level faculty. In an effort to address this critical need, the NRMNet portal was developed as part of the National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN).
The first phase of NRMN was funded from 2014-2019, and it is the focus of this article. NRMN is a nationwide consortium collaborating to provide students and scientists across all career stages of research in the biomedical, behavioral, clinical, and social sciences with enhanced mentorship, networking, and professional development. The goal of the NRMN is to diversify the biomedical workforce.10 The NIH Statement of Diversity, which NRMN follows, specifies its commitment to addressing under-representation of key populations within the biomedical research workforce.11 Underrepresented groups in these fields are: Blacks or African Americans, Hispanic/Latinx, American Indians or Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders, individuals with disabilities, individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds, and women.11
The NRMNet portal, one activity of the NRMN, provides a broad-based network of mentors who are accessible to diverse mentees across the country and provides mentors and mentees with resources that support mentee transitions from one career stage to the next. The overarching objective of the portal is to create a sustainable digital infrastructure to support and facilitate culturally responsive mentorship (CRM), networking, and professional development. The portal is built on the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) that supports immersion, career progression, and persistence within the biomedical research fields. Mentoring relationships and the development of career intentions, motivations, and persistence occur within the social and psychological domains of career development, which is well described by SCCT.12 The SCCT is at the foundation of NRMN’s conceptual model because it: 1) is a well-studied theory with 20 years of strong empirical support; 2) addresses developmental tasks that occur across career stages; 3) has demonstrated the ability to bring together related concepts (eg, self-efficacy, science identity, personal identity); and 4) captures environmental factors such as mentoring, networking, and professional development and influences career development, persistence, and choice.
Intervention
The NRMNet portal (nrmnet.net), launched in July 2015, is the gateway to career stage-specific resources that support end-users from undergraduates to academic administrators. Users register as an NRMN mentor or mentee by completing a set of profile questions used to create connections. Through the portal, users can access mentorship and networking to deepen their connection to the diverse nationwide scientific community and engage in professional development and career-designed resources to hone their skills for a successful career trajectory. NRMNet also includes an events calendar with partner and NRMN activities, NRMN Career Development Webinars, social media presence, and other NRMN resources to enrich the users’ STEM experiences. All resources are available at no cost.
MyMentor: Culturally Responsive Mentorship
NRMN defines mentoring as a collaborative learning relationship that proceeds through purposeful stages over time and helps mentees acquire the essential competencies needed for success in their chosen career. Through the MyMentor application, members participate in a one-on-one guided virtual mentorship (GVM) to embark on a culturally responsive, ongoing mentoring connection utilizing an evidence-based curriculum. Additionally, scientific/professional societies/organizations, institutions, and programs can create exclusive GVM environments specifically for their members.
Based on research literature on multicultural training regarding effective practices of culturally responsive teaching,13-15 NRMN adopted the term culturally responsive mentoring (CRM). NRMN strived to facilitate and support extended CRM through an evidence-based curriculum featuring effective mentoring practices.16 This curriculum includes: aligning expectations; identity as a scientist; work-life balance; dealing with stress; microaggressions; cultural identity; perseverance; and networking.
To embark on a MyMentor connection, mentees identify their current career stage and then select a mentor either based on the matching algorithm derived from the NRMN profile questions or based on the results of their own search. Once the mentor accepts the mentoring request, the dyad receives the curriculum with 19 discussion prompts to guide the connection. The default setting is to complete one prompt per week, but this can be altered based on needs. On average, mentors and mentees spend approximately 30 minutes per week engaging in their connections.
MyNRMN: Networking
The MyNRMN application is a networking tool designed to help mentees and mentors connect professionally and support mentoring relationships and connections nationwide. With MyNRMN, users can browse profiles of other members to build their network, ask questions (eg, general, research, professional development, etc.), and schedule formal mentorship appointments. Additionally, users can video chat with other members, join and/or create groups, and build their CV/resume. To continuously improve the user experience on our virtual platforms, we established a Product Council to provide advice on the efficacy and utility of the technical platform, branding, and strategic development of the GVM features and networking platforms.
Professional Development
The NRMN Career Development Webinar (CDW) Series explores the challenges and importance of finding a mentor within the biophysical community, the role of mentoring for URM, and the resources in NRMN. NRMN hosts a monthly webinar to guide individuals through the resources available to both NRMN members and non-members. The goal of these monthly webinars is to develop a community and to expose upcoming researchers and scholars to new opportunities and perspectives to increase diversity in the biomedical fields. We partner with organizations and professionals to provide content relevant to mentorship, diversity, and STEM. All webinars are available at no cost on NRMNet. NRMN also created and implemented professional development and grantsmanship coaching to support grant funding success of URM scholars. Associated details regarding the NRMN grantsmanship programs and outcomes can be found in the literature.10,17,18
Recruitment
The NRMN recruitment strategy consisted of three main components: the NRMN Ambassador Program; In-Person Recruitment; and Social Media/Virtual Recruitment. From the inception, we acknowledged that to recruit a diverse, nationwide network of mentors and mentees for a new program, our recruitment strategy needed to focus heavily on developing a network of NRMN Ambassadors. The NRMN Ambassadors program consists of NRMN mentors and mentees, NRMN staff, and NRMN partners, who agree to assist with the recruitment of mentors and mentees to the network. Utilizing NRMN Ambassadors not only engendered a nationwide awareness of NRMN, but was also a fiscally responsible strategy for recruitment. We capitalized on the fact that NRMN Ambassadors were already attending scientific/professional society meetings and/or other conferences as part of their own research/professional commitment. We equipped NRMN Ambassadors with the appropriate training and resources to represent NRMN at these meetings/conferences.
Many in-person recruitment events were conducted to learn which would give the best yield of enrollees to NRMN. The methods and tactics implemented during these events were also trial and error, helping us discover best practices. For instance, during the first year, prospects who expressed interest in NRMN provided their name and email. After the event, we sent them information about NRMN and how to register via email. Despite multiple outreach attempts to these prospects, only a few individuals opened the welcome email, clicked through, and navigated to the NRMN website to register. Consequently, we implemented a two-step registration process during in-person events such as the Annual Biomedical Research Conference for Minority Students (ABRCMS) and the meeting of the Society for Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science (SACNAS). In Years 4-5, individuals registered at the event by submitting their name and email or registering using single sign-on (LinkedIn, Facebook, or Gmail) through NRMNet. By completing this first step, the user became an NRMN member. The user could complete the remaining profile questions on-site or return later to finish. The implementation of the two-step registration process alleviated the challenge of prospects not wanting to register on-site due to the length of the process.
NRMN Ambassadors also conducted virtual recruitment, through NRMNet, social media, demos/webinars, email campaigns, and the NRMN Newsletter. We tracked user traffic through each type of recruitment campaign. We created and used the Urchin Tracking links that provided analytics to help us learn which campaigns were most effective and adjusted recruitment strategies accordingly. Additionally, we incorporated Google Analytics to gain a better understanding of the user experience, including the registration process, the most useful resources, and most-often visited content on the website.
Results
MyMentor: Culturally Responsive Mentorship
By the end of Phase I, 906 dyads completed a GVM connection. Upon completion of a mentoring connection, mentees and mentors are asked to complete a survey about their experience. In total, 77 mentees and 114 mentors responded to the survey. Regarding the quality of the mentoring connections, 54.5% of mentees responded that the mentoring they received was “Excellent.” When asked about the mentoring relationship, 59.7% of mentees and 43.9% of mentors responded that their relationship was “Excellent.” When asked, “how good of a match do you feel you and your [mentor/mentee] was?” 55.6% of mentees and 48.2% of mentors responded with “Excellent.” In a matrix of improvement, 50.7% of mentees responded that they improved in aligning expectations, 46.6% in setting goals, 47.9% in managing demands, 41.0% in managing stress, 39.7% in managing their work/life balance, 30.1% in their sense of belonging, 32.9% in their science identity, 50.7% in building/expanding their professional networks, and 45.2% in feeling prepared for the next steps in their career. Additional outcomes for NRMN’s GVM program will be reported in future publications.
MyNRMN: Networking
NRMN’s networking component, MyNRMN, helped mentees and mentors connect across the United States and some US territories. This is especially important for areas with mentoring deficits, as discussed earlier. Between the launch of MyNRMN, May 11, 2016, and the end of NRMN Phase I, June 30, 2019, the platform saw 4,197 member network connections, 678 “Find a Mentor” connections, 4,060 comments posted, 108 calendar events created, 345 files shared, 790 CV/resumes uploaded or created, and 156 My Groups created with 1,842 participants in these groups. For additional outcomes about MyNRMN refer to Ahmed et al.19
Professional Development
The Career Development Webinars (CDWs) are a collaborative effort to deliver professional development resources to members and nonmembers. One of our most attended webinars was in collaboration with Dr. Jaime Rubin of Columbia Medical School. Dr. Rubin presented, “Transitioning to Research Independence: Funding & Grantsmanship for Newly Independent Investigators.” We had more than 740 registrations and more than 400 participants who attended the webinar. Other CDWs included the monthly “How to Leverage the NRMN Network Webinar Series,” a partnership with iBiology, NRMN Health Research Talks, and resources for those applying to and/or working through graduate school and early career objectives.
Recruitment
A steady increase of participants was seen with nearly 13,000 registered users from 2014-2019 (Table 1). The NRMN strategic recruitment efforts, with an emphasis on the NRMN Ambassador program, resulted in a steady increase throughout the years and representation of NRMN in all 50 states and Puerto Rico (Figure 1). This was achieved through attendance at various recruitment events during the early years. We quickly learned that attending the SACNAS and the ABRCMS yearly conferences yielded the highest returns for NRMN.
Table 1. NRMN recruitment growth.
| Year | Mentees | Mentors | Undeclared | Total |
| Year 1 (2014-2015) | 37 | 16 | 0 | 53 |
| Year 2 (2015-2016) | 1688 | 983 | 52 | 2723 |
| Year 3 (2016-2017) | 3687 | 2005 | 733 | 6425 |
| Year 4 (2017-2018) | 4846 | 2617 | 1726 | 9189 |
| Year 5 (2018-2019) | 6528 | 3894 | 2539 | 12961 |
Figure 1. NRMN registrants geographically represented by zip code. Mentees and mentors are located in all 50 states and some territories, however this map only depicts the contiguous United States.

Registration at ABRCMS and SACNAS conferences significantly increased mentors/mentees. During Years 2-3 we registered 389 individuals from these two conferences. After the two-step registration process was implemented in Years 4 and 5, we increased registration by 374.3% to a total of 1,456 individuals within those two years.
Table 2 shows the race/ethnicity of NRMN mentees and mentors and demonstrates that our recruitment strategy resulted in a community of diverse members. Of those tracked through May 2019, 59% of the currently registered mentees were from underrepresented groups, and 27% self-identified as Hispanic/Latinx. Thirty-four percent of mentors self-identified as belonging to an underrepresented group, and 14% self-identified as Hispanic/Latinx. Regarding sex, 67% of mentees self-identified as female, and 56% of mentors self-identified as female (Table 2). Regarding education levels, the largest groups of mentees are undergraduates (32%), professional/non-student (24%), and postdoctoral (18%) (Table 3). Mentors are largely composed of professional/non-student (76%) and postdoctoral (11%). Table 3 also shows the career breakdown of NRMN mentors and mentees. Assistant professors and postdoctoral fellows constitute the highest group of mentees, totaling 982 and 866 respectively, and mentors 642 and 258 respectively, among all career stages. Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 illustrate the geographical distribution of NRMN members within the contiguous United States, per the 2010 US Census Data. As previously shown, the NRMN population contains 6,526 mentees and 3,886 mentors. These figures demonstrate NRMN’s success in recruiting mentors and mentees in states where the specific race/ethnicity is more prominent, and provides NRMN the opportunity to evaluate recruitment initiatives. Figure 2 illustrates the Black or African American population throughout the United States and the percentage of Black or African American mentees (30%) and mentors (12.5%) of the NRMN’s total population of 6,256, and 3,886, respectively. Likewise, Figure 3 shows the distribution of the Hispanic/Latinx population, with mentees, 18.4%, mentors, 8.9% of the total mentee/mentor population. Figure 4 shows that, of the total mentee/mentor population, 2.3% mentees and 1.6 mentors were American Indian.
Table 2. NRMN mentee and mentor demographics (gender, race, and ethnicity).
| Demographic | Mentees | Mentors | ||
| n | % | n | % | |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 4395 | 67.3% | 2196 | 56.5% |
| Male | 1829 | 28.0% | 1415 | 36.4% |
| Transgender | 13 | 0.2% | 8 | 0.2% |
| Intersex | 4 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.1% |
| Other | 17 | 0.3% | 9 | 0.2% |
| Prefer not to report | 73 | 1.1% | 209 | 5.4% |
| No selection | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 0.1% |
| Blank | 194 | 3.0% | 46 | 1.2% |
| Race | ||||
| Asian | 862 | 13.2% | 488 | 12.6% |
| Black | 1958 | 30.0% | 487 | 12.5% |
| Hawaiian-Pacific Islander | 57 | 0.9% | 24 | 0.6% |
| Mixed race | 306 | 4.7% | 109 | 2.8% |
| Native American | 149 | 2.3% | 63 | 1.6% |
| White | 1978 | 30.3% | 2211 | 56.9% |
| Other | 498 | 7.6% | 139 | 3.6% |
| Prefer not to report | 460 | 7.0% | 299 | 7.7% |
| Blank | 258 | 4.0% | 66 | 1.7% |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Cuban | 52 | 0.8% | 26 | 0.7% |
| Mexican-Chicano | 574 | 8.8% | 169 | 4.3% |
| Puerto Rican | 577 | 8.8% | 150 | 3.9% |
| Mixed ethnicity | 61 | 0.9% | 21 | 0.5% |
| Non-Latino | 4277 | 65.5% | 2993 | 76.9% |
| Other | 472 | 7.2% | 180 | 4.6% |
| Prefer not to report | 274 | 4.2% | 285 | 7.3% |
| Blank | 241 | 3.7% | 66 | 1.7% |
All data in this table are self-reported from the NRMN registrants; data collected during registration.
Table 3. NRMN mentee and mentor demographics (career and education levels).
| Demographic | Mentees | Mentors | ||
| n | % | n | % | |
| Career levela | ||||
| Non-science field | 370 | 180 | ||
| Science field | 790 | 438 | ||
| Research staff | 335 | 114 | ||
| Post doc | 866 | 258 | ||
| Instructor | 181 | 184 | ||
| Asst prof | 982 | 642 | ||
| Assoc prof | 158 | 640 | ||
| Prof | 51 | 901 | ||
| Retired | 3 | 26 | ||
| Other | 601 | 461 | ||
| None | 1525 | 139 | ||
| Blank | 1166 | 219 | ||
| Education level | ||||
| Undergraduate | 2116 | 32.4% | 102 | 2.6% |
| Post doc | 1183 | 18.1% | 438 | 11.3% |
| DVM | 6 | .1% | 3 | .1% |
| DDS | 10 | .2% | 5 | .1% |
| PharmD | 21 | .3% | 1 | .0% |
| MD/PhD | 46 | .7% | 11 | .3% |
| MD | 49 | .8% | 4 | .1% |
| PhD | 856 | 13.1% | 188 | 4.8% |
| Masters | 352 | 5.4% | 59 | 1.5% |
| Post baccalaureate | 138 | 2.1% | 13 | .3% |
| Professional/non-student | 1561 | 23.9% | 2961 | 76.1% |
| Other/retired | 0 | .0% | 17 | .4% |
| None | 190 | 2.9% | 89 | 2.3% |
aThis question asked users to “select all that apply.”
Note: all data in this table are self-reported from the NRMN registrants; data collected during registration.
Figure 2. The dots represent geographic distribution by zip code of mentees and mentors according to their self-identified race/ethnicity.

This map represents the US population racial/ethnic distribution of Blacks or African Americans according to the 2010 US Census Data. Information for the US Territories were not included in the US Census Data. This map only depicts the contiguous United States
Figure 3. The dots represent geographic distribution by zip code of mentees and mentors according to their self-identified race/ethnicity.

This map represents the US population racial/ethnic distribution of Hispanics or Latinos according to the 2010 US Census Data. Information for the US Territories were not included in the US Census Data. This map only depicts the contiguous United States
Figure 4. The dots represent geographic distribution by zip code of mentees and mentors according to their self-identified race/ethnicity.

This map represents the US population racial/ethnic distribution of American Indians according to the 2010 US Census Data. Information for the US Territories were not included in the US Census Data. This map only depicts the contiguous United States
Discussion
The Importance of Mentoring
Mentoring is an important factor contributing to career advancement and success.20,21 Individual-centered mentoring serves the personal aspiration, which is best met by developing a network of mentors that supports long-term career and professional goals.20,22,23 NRMNet is a unique, novel online mentoring site that brings together mentors and mentees nationwide for culturally responsive mentoring through MyMentor, networking, and professional development. We recruited a diverse population of mentors and mentees who can connect virtually from across the nation or within the same city. The strength of the NRMN platform is that it can be leveraged by individuals and organizations to supplement their mentoring, networking, and professional development resources and offerings without being bounded by physical location.
In addition to providing a platform for mentees to obtain access to multiple mentors, we provided a space for participants to hold dual roles, as mentors and mentees. As noted in Table 3, most mentees were at the assistant professor and post docs career stage, which indicates the need for mentorship at these career stages. Interestingly, the data in Table 3 also shows a considerable number of assistant professors and post docs who serve as mentors, demonstrating the need for having a mentor at this career stage and a willingness to give back as a mentor. Mentoring is lacking for early career professionals in biomedical research, yet this is a critical transition point in their career paths.24-26 As seen in the survey data obtained from MyMentor, GVM is an effective means for those lacking mentoring to obtain it, especially if mentors are not available in their area. Of interest and according to data from the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, there were 2,915 URM postdocs in science, engineering, and health in 2017.27 In the same year, NRMN had 1,124 postdocs as members, representing 38.5% of URM postdocs in the nation as members of NRMN, and indicating the importance of NRMN in providing mentorship and networking for this critical career transition stage.
Recruitment
As shown in Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 we were successful in recruiting mentors and mentees in states where the specific race/ethnicity is more prominent. Figure 4 shows the presence of NRMN American Indian mentees in the Northeast region but also shows few American Indian mentors within this region. This example emphasizes the need for a virtual national mentoring program in which mentees from regions that lack mentors can connect with mentors in other parts of the country. Further, in locations with fewer mentors and mentees, there is an opportunity to evaluate our recruitment initiatives and focus on the areas with less representation. In Texas, for example, of the regions displaying NRMN mentors who identified as Hispanic/Latinx, the east, and central regions are modestly represented while the north, south, and west regions lack NRMN mentor representation (Figure 3). Regarding mentees, Figure 3 illustrates a high density of NRMN mentees who identified as Hispanic/Latinx in most areas of Texas except for the northern region. These datasets help us develop strategic recruitment plans to focus our mentor reach in the north, south, and western regions of Texas and our mentee reach in the southern region of Texas. Additionally, there are specific states with a high density of a certain race/ethnicity but with little NRMN representation from that specific race/ethnicity. For instance, as illustrated in Figure 4, Oklahoma has a high density of American Indians, but there are only a few NRMN mentors in this state. These data identify an opportunity for outreach to colleges, institutions, and organizations to increase our NRMN mentor presence in Oklahoma.
Despite our success in establishing a network of close to 13,000 mentors and mentees, there is still a lot of work to do. Consistently throughout the 5 years, approximately two-thirds of our mentors were from well-represented groups, yet our mentee population is two-thirds from URM groups. The lack of URM mentors, especially of those at the more senior career stages, is consistent with the paucity of URM at the tenure track level.28 We observed that mentors who receive training are more willing to participate in a voluntary mentoring program as a number of our mentors came as participants from mentor training provided through NRMN by the Mentor Training Core. For more information about the mentor training refer to Sorkness et al.10 We will continue to assess our NRMN recruitment strategies to increase our network of URM mentors, however, at a national level, we need to decrease the attrition of scientists from underrepresented groups within the biomedical research workforce and increase their recruitment and retention in this workforce.
Future Considerations and Limitations
Individuals with disabilities are underrepresented in the biomedical fields.11 Creating an optimal user experience for individuals with disabilities is of utmost importance; however, it requires substantial resources. Of those NRMNet registrants who provided disability information, approximately 3% of mentors and 8% of mentees stated having one or more types of disability. As resources become available, we will make the NRMNet platform more accessible for all users.
Furthermore, there is a dearth of literature focused on online mentoring that seeks to diversify the biomedical, behavioral, and STEM workforce in the United States. Online mentoring is an emerging topic that continues to grow.29 The lessons learned in building a national platform for mentoring and networking contributes to the scholarship surrounding CRM and networking.
Throughout our recruitment events and individual conversations, we learned the value of top-down support for mentoring initiatives. Organizations and departments attempting to establish, implement, and maintain mentoring programs are faced with significant barriers when they do not receive support from their leadership. NRMN provides a platform that institutions of higher education, organizations, and programs can leverage to support mentor training, mentoring, and networking activities. Nonetheless, those in leadership positions must understand the impact of mentoring and how creating a diverse and inclusive STEM workforce benefits the scientific enterprise.
Conclusion
We created a sustainable online architecture to support and facilitate CRM to accelerate the research career development of scholars. NRMN achieved a network of nearly 13,000 diverse members with representation in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. NRMN has led the effort of enhancing the participation and persistence of diverse individuals in biomedical research careers by providing CRM, networking, and professionalism for individuals at all career stages. However, we will need to continue to collect longitudinal data in order to show additional outcomes on how NRMN accelerated the research career development of URM scholars.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences program officers as well as the tremendous contributions of the past and present NRMN team who participated in the development and continuous improvement of NRMNet and its programs. The authors would also like to thank Alexis Short for her contributions as the NRMN Digital Communication Strategist. Further, the authors would like to thank all NRMN Ambassadors who participated in bringing mentors and mentees to the NRMN network. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U54GM119023 and U24GM132217. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Previous Presentations
Data in this manuscript have been provided to the National Institutes of Health as part of the Diversity Program Consortium for programmatic purposes. Data in this article are new and unpublished.
Accessing Materials
NRMNet platform and resources can be found at www.nrmnet.net. To become an NRMN mentor and/or mentee, the participant must complete a set of profile questions. To be eligible to participate in the program, a participant must be at aged ≥18 years. If the participant is a mentee, the participant must be US citizen, US non-citizen national, or permanent resident.
References
- 1.Shavers VL, Fagan P, Lawrence D, et al. Barriers to racial/ethnic minority application and competition for NIH research funding. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(8):1063-1077. 10.13016/svzo-zpdy [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beech BM, Calles-Escandon J, Hairston KG, Langdon SE, Latham-Sadler BA, Bell RA. Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2013;88(4):541-549. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828589e3 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828589e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morzinski JA, Fisher JC. A nationwide study of the influence of faculty development programs on colleague relationships. Acad Med. 2002;77(5):402-406. 10.1097/00001888-200205000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thomas SB. The color line: race matters in the elimination of health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(7):1046-1048. 10.2105/AJPH.91.7.1046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ginther DK, Schaffer WT, Schnell J, et al. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science. 2011;333(6045):015-019. https://doi. org/ 10.1126/science.1196783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Tabak LA, Collins FS. Sociology. Weaving a richer tapestry in biomedical science. Science. 2011;333(6045):940-941. 10.1126/science.1211704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dumas-Hines FA, Francis A, Cochran LL, Williams EU. Promoting diversity: recommendations for recruitment and retention of minorities in higher education. Coll Stud J. 2001;33:190-196. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Smith DG. The challenge of diversity: alienation in the academy and its implications for faculty. J Excell Coll Teach. 1991;2:129-137. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Taylor E, Olswang SG. Crossing the color line: african Americans and predominantly white universities. Coll Stud J. 1997;31:11-18. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sorkness CA, Pfund C, Ofili EO, et al. ; Duplicate Of Weber-Main; NRMN team . A new approach to mentoring for research careers: the National Research Mentoring Network. BMC Proc. 2017;11(S12)(suppl 12):22. 10.1186/s12919-017-0083-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.National Institutes of Health . Notice of NIH’s Interest in Diversity. Notice Number: NOT-OD-20-031. National Institutes of Health; November 22, 2019. Last accessed November 18, 2020 from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-20-031.html.
- 12.Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Toward a unified social cognitive theory of career/ academic interest, choice, and performance. J Vocat Behav. 1994;45(1):79-122. 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gay G. Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. J Teach Educ. 2002;53(2):106-116. 10.1177/0022487102053002003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.National Center for Cultural Competence . Cultural Awareness. Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development. Last accessed May 17, 2021 from https://nccc.georgetown.edu/index.php
- 15.Siwatu OS. Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teach Teach Educ. 2007;23(7):1086-1101. 10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pfund C, Byars-Winston A, Branchaw J, Hurtado S, Eagan K. Defining attributes and metrics of effective research mentoring relationships. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(2)(suppl 2):238-248. 10.1007/s10461-016-1384-z 10.1007/s10461-016-1384-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hall M, Engler J, Hemming J, et al. Using a virtual community (the Health Equity Learning Collaboratory) to support early-stage investigators pursuing grant funding. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):E2408. 10.3390/ijerph15112408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jones HP, McGee R, Weber-Main AM, et al. Enhancing research careers: an example of a US national diversity-focused, grant-writing training and coaching experiment. BMC Proc. 2017;11(12)(suppl 12):16. 10.1186/s12919-017-0084-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ahmed T, Johnson J, Latif Z, et al. MyNRMN: A national mentoring and networking platform to enhance connectivity and diversity in the biomedical sciences. FASEB Bioadv. 2021;00:1-13. 10.1096/fba.2020-00102 10.1096/fba.2020-00102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Higgins MC, Kram KE. Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Acad Manage Rev. 2001;26(2):264-288. 10.5465/amr.2001.4378023 10.5465/amr.2001.4378023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Packard BW. Successful STEM Mentoring Initiatives for Underrepresented Students: A Research-Based Guide for Faculty and Administrators. Stylus Publishing; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sorcinelli MD, Yun J. From mentor to mentoring networks: mentoring in the new academy. Change. 2007;39(6):58-61. 10.3200/CHNG.39.6.58-C4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McGee R, Lee S, Pfund C, Branchaw J. Beyond “finding good mentors” to “building and cultivating your mentoring team.”. In: Huang BL, ed. Advancing Postdoc Women Guidebook. Washington, DC: National Postdoctoral Association; 2015:23-33. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yadav A, Seals CD, Soto Sullivan CM, et al. The forgotten scholar: underrepresented minority postdoc experiences in STEM fields. Educational Studies: J of the American Educ Studies Assoc. 2020; 56(2):1-26. https://doi.or g/ 10.1080/00131946.2019.1702552 10.1080/00131946.2019.1702552 [DOI]
- 25.National Academy of Sciences (US), National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research . Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume II. Washington (DC): Natl Acad Press.1993. 3, Mentorship and the Research Training Experience. Last accessed May 12, 2021 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236193/
- 26.Reinero DA. The path to professorship by the numbers and why mentorship matters. October 23, 2019. Blog Post: Behavioural and Social Sciences. Last accessed May 12, 2021 from: https://socialsciences.nature.com/posts/55118-the-path-to-professorship-by-the-numbers-and-why-mentorship-matters
- 27.National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics . Survey of Graduate Students And Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering. National Science Foundation; 2017. Last accessed November 18, 2020 from https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/gradpostdoc/2017/index.html.
- 28.Valantine HA, Lund PK, Gammie AE. From the NIH: A Systems Approach to Increasing the Diversity of the Biomedical Research Workforce. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(3):1-5. 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Walsh K. Online mentoring in medical education. S Afr Fam Pract. 2015. 10.1080/20786190.2015.1059020 10.1080/20786190.2015.1059020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
