Abstract
Central precocious puberty (CPP) refers to a human syndrome of early puberty initiation with characteristic increase in hypothalamic production and release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Previously, loss-of-function mutations in human MKRN3, encoding a putative E3 ubiquitin ligase, were found to contribute to about 30% of cases of familial CPP. MKRN3 was thereby suggested to serve as a ‘brake’ of mammalian puberty onset, but the underlying mechanisms remain as yet unknown. Here, we report that genetic ablation of Mkrn3 did accelerate mouse puberty onset with increased production of hypothalamic GnRH1. MKRN3 interacts with and ubiquitinates MBD3, which epigenetically silences GNRH1 through disrupting the MBD3 binding to the GNRH1 promoter and recruitment of DNA demethylase TET2. Our findings have thus delineated a molecular mechanism through which the MKRN3–MBD3 axis controls the epigenetic switch in the onset of mammalian puberty.
Keywords: ubiquitin, MKRN3, DNA methylation, MBD3, DNA demethylase, central precocious puberty
INTRODUCTION
Mammalian puberty is a process through which sexual competence and reproduction are attained under the regulation of the anatomic hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis [1]. The HPG axis is active during fetal and neonatal stages, but becomes quiescent during childhood, until ultimately reactivated upon pubertal initiation, which is characterized by an increase in the amplitude and frequency of pulsatile hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release. The re-emergence of pulsatile GnRH secretion subsequently leads to increases in the secretion of gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) by the anterior pituitary gland and the consequent activation of gonadal function [2]. The HPG axis can also be prematurely activated to initiate gonadotropin-dependent precocious puberty, resulting in central precocious puberty (CPP) that clinically defines those who develop secondary sexual characteristics before the age of 8 years in girls or 9 years in boys. CPP is currently estimated to affect approximately 1 in 5000–10 000 of the population worldwide, resulting from complex interactions among genetic, nutritional, environmental and socioeconomic factors. The dysregulated timing of puberty is known to associate with risks of many subsequent diseases, e.g. earlier age of menarche in girls is associated with increased risks of breast cancer, endometrial cancer, obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, indicating the critical importance of the delicate but as-yet-unknown mechanisms that regulate human puberty [3,4]. Meanwhile, epigenetic reprogramming has been proposed to play pivotal roles in the expression of puberty-related genes in the control of puberty initiation and development, with detailed mechanisms as yet incompletely understood [5–7].
A recent study has revealed mutations or deletions in the human MKRN3 (Makorin ring finger protein 3) gene in familial CPP cohorts, which was estimated to contribute to ∼30% of familial CPP cases worldwide [8]. As many of these mutations might disrupt the MKRN3 structure and impair its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, MKRN3 was proposed to act as a ‘brake’ or repressor of GnRH production in regulating mammalian puberty. However, it remains totally unclear how the disease-causing mutations or deletions in the MKRN3 gene lead to premature GnRH production and release [9].
DNA methylation and demethylation are catalysed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and demethylases (human ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenases, TETs), respectively. Such reactions occur at the carbon-5 position of cytosine residues in CpG nucleotides, leading to the formation or decomposition of 5-methylcytosine (5mC), 5-hydroxylmethylcytosine (5hmC) and other derivatives, which constitutes a fundamental epigenetic mechanism that regulates gene expression in mammalian cells [10–13]. Proteins of the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) family were first defined as those that read DNA methylation and recruit chromatin remodelers, e.g. histone deacetylases and methyltransferases, to methylated DNA and repress gene expression [14]. Among MBDs (Methyl-CpG-DNA binding proteins), MBD2 and MBD3 interact with the nucleosome remodeling deacetylase (NuRD/Mi-2) complex members to repress gene expression. However, unlike MBD2 that binds to methylated DNAs and mainly represses gene expression, MBD3 has been shown to bind primarily to promoters, exons and enhancers of actively transcribed genes, suggesting more diverse roles of MBD3 in regulating gene expression [15–18]. MBD3 and some of its isoforms were found to interact with and promote the DNA demethylase activity of human ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2), which could dynamically and specifically impact the methylation status of gene loci [19]. Mutations within MBD3 were associated with human cancer and neurocognitive disorders, such as autistic spectrum disorders (ASDs) [20,21]. Furthermore, MBD3 has been shown to modulate cell pluripotency, but with opposite effects in different studies [17,22–24]. Such findings, while reminding us of how little we know about the complex mechanisms through which MBD3 exerts its biological roles, may be reconciled by taking into account the possibility that MBD3 could undergo distinct post-translational modifications that might differentially modulate the homeostasis and function of MBD3 in a spatiotemporally controlled manner. However, it remains entirely unknown whether and how such post-translational modifications might occur and regulate MBD3 function in any pathophysiologically meaningful way.
In this work, we generated the first genetic model of human CPP by constructing a Mkrn3 knockout mouse strain and establishing its role in regulating the onset of puberty and a repressor role in regulating Gnrh1 expression. We next identified MBD3 as a novel physiological substrate for the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of MKRN3. MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination was found to disrupt the interactions between MBD3 with 5hmC-containing GNRH1 promoter or TET2, resulting in the epigenetic silence of GNRH1 expression. Moreover, it was confirmed in patient-derived cells that the disease-causing mutations indeed impaired the ubiquitination of endogenous MBD3, supporting a strong clinical relevance of our experimental findings.
RESULTS
Maternally imprinted Mkrn3 regulates the onset of puberty and represses Gnrh1 expression in mice
The mouse Mkrn3 gene contains a single exon and resides adjacent to the Prader–Willi Syndrome Imprinting Center (PWS-IC) on chromosome 7, which encodes Mkrn3 protein that shares high sequence homology with other mammalian orthologs (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. 1A). The mouse Mkrn3 gene was expressed in tissues with a distinct pattern, being most abundant throughout the brain, lower in testis and barely detectible in all other tissues examined (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Mkrn3 protein expression in mouse hypothalamus was found to undergo an age-dependent decrease during development, with a sharp reduction occurring at postnatal day 15 to day 18, coinciding with the time of the first neuroendocrine step of puberty initiation (Supplementary Fig. 1C). Consistently with a previous report [8], the age-dependent decline in Mkrn3 expression was found to inversely correlate with that of Gnrh1 in the hypothalamus of mice (Supplementary Fig. 1D).
Mice were genetically modified through introducing a 2-bp deletion in the single exon of the Mkrn3 gene using the TALEN, transcription activator-like (TAL) effector nucleases, technique (Supplementary Fig. 1E) and a mating of a heterozygous Mkrn3+/– male with a wild-type female generated equal numbers of Mkrn3-deficient and wild-type offspring (Fig. 1B). As shown in Fig. 1C, the expression of endogenous Mkrn3 protein was indeed abolished in Mkrn3−/− mice or in heterozygotes that harbored wild-type Mkrn3 only in the maternally inherited allele (Mkrn3m+/p−). Meanwhile, Mkrn3 was expressed at levels comparable to those in age- and sex-matched littermates that harbored wild-type Mkrn3 either in the paternally inherited allele only (Mkrn3m–/p+) or in both alleles (Mkrn3+/+), suggesting that Mkrn3 is indeed maternally imprinted in mice. The brain immunostaining showed that Mkrn3 could be detected in the whole hypothalamus of wild- type mice, but little in Mkrn3m+/p− mice (Supplementary Fig. 1F).
Phenotypical studies were then performed with the mice. Male mice with Mkrn3 ablated in the paternally inherited allele (Mkrn3m+/p−) manifested in reduced body weights when compared to those of the age-matched wild-type ones through postnatal day 15 to day 60 (Fig. 1D). However, the female Mkrn3-ablated mice showed higher body weight from postnatal day 15 to day 40, but reduced body weight was observed from postnatal day 45 to day 60 compared to those age-matched wild-type mice (Fig. 1E). The preputial separation time of male Mkrn3m+/p− mice (31.07 ± 0.3649 days) was earlier than that of wild-type mice (32.94 ± 0.4211 days) (Fig. 1F and Supplementary Fig. 1G) and testis hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining indicated that the stage of elongating spermatids in Mkrn3m+/p− mice comes earlier than that of wild-type mice (Supplementary Fig. 1H). The virginal opening time of female Mkrn3m+/p− mice (31.17 ± 0.4525 days) was earlier than that of wild-type mice (34.11 ± 0.4023 days) (Fig. 1G and Supplementary Fig. 1G). The earlier first time of estrus was observed in Mkrn3m+/p− female mice (37.56 ± 0.4693) compared to that of wild-type mice (42.33 ± 0.6435) (Fig. 1H and Supplementary Fig. 1I). However, the first litter numbers were almost the same regardless of the genotype (Supplementary Fig. 1J). These observations were remarkably reminiscent of the symptoms typically observed in untreated CPP patients.
The mRNA of Gnrh1 expressed in Mkrn3m+/p− mice, measured at the age of 15 days, was approximately 50% higher than that of the wild-type controls (Fig. 1I), while no significant changes were detected in the expression of Kiss1 or NKB (Supplementary Fig. 1K). The levels of GnRH1 in both hypothalamic tissue and serum were significantly higher in Mkrn3m+/p− mice than those in control groups (Fig. 1J and Supplementary Fig. 1L). The serum levels of LH and FSH were then measured and both were found to be 1.5- or 2-fold higher in Mkrn3m+/p− mice than in wild type (Supplementary Fig. 1M). Immunostaining further indicated that the hypothalamic production of GnRH1 protein was markedly higher in Mkrn3m+/p− mice than in wild type (Fig. 1K). Similar results were also observed with GNRHR (GnRH1 receptor) (Supplementary Fig. 1N). Meanwhile, no obvious changes were observed at the protein level of KISS1 and NKB in Mkrn3m+/p− mice compared to that in wild type (Supplementary Fig. 1O and P).
Luciferase reporter assays further indicated that the transcriptional activation of the human GNRH1 gene promoter (−3007 to 0 bp) was 100% higher in MKRN3−/− HEK293T cells; however, the reintroduction of MKRN3 led to ∼2- to 3-fold reduction in gene expression driven by the GNRH1 promoter (Fig. 1L and Supplementary Fig. 1Q and R). In GT1–7 cells that were derived from hypothalamic GnRH-positive neurons, mouse Mkrn3 potently repressed Gnrh1 expression at both the mRNA and the protein levels (Supplementary Fig. 1S). Altogether, these findings established MKRN3 as an authentic repressor of GnRH1 expression at both the cellular and the organism levels.
CPP-associated mutations compromise the auto-ubiquitination of MKRN3
MKRN3 is highly conserved in mammals, especially in its RING finger C3HC4 motif, which likely harbors the active site for an E3 ubiquitin ligase (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Currently, multiple mutations of MKRN3, either missense or frameshift, have been found in individuals with CPP and were proposed to compromise its E3 ligase activity, since individuals harboring missense or frameshift mutations manifested similar symptoms (Fig. 2A). Specifically, four of these missense mutations in MKRN3, indicated in red, were located within the zinc finger or RING finger motifs that were known to be essential for its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity (Fig. 2A). We next examined whether and how these CPP-associated mutations in MKRN3 might indeed impact the function of MKRN3. As shown in Fig. 2B, levels of the endogenous MKRN3 protein were increased upon treatment with the proteasomal inhibitor Bortezomib (BTZ) but not the autophagy inhibitor Bafilomycin A1 (BAF) in HEK293T cells, while all de novo protein synthesis was inhibited by cycloheximide (CHX). This result clearly suggested that the degradation of endogenous MKRN3 protein was proteasome-dependent, rather than through autophagy. Compared with wild-type MKRN3, all the four CPP-causing mutants showed significantly (3- to 8-fold) higher stability when ectopically expressed in HEK293T MKRN3−/− cells or Mkrn3m+/p− MEF cells (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. 2A and B). These data revealed that auto-ubiquitination is another layer of regulation on the homeostasis of MKRN3 and, presumably, its functionality as well.
An in vitro ubiquitination system was then assembled to contain ATP, an E1 Ub-activating enzyme (Uba1), MKRN3 (the E3 ligase) and different E2 Ub conjugating enzymes that could support MKRN3 auto-ubiquitination (Supplementary Fig. 2C). GST pull-down assay indicated that recombinant MKRN3 protein directly interacted with UBCH5A, a member of the UBCH5 subfamily of E2s that could also support MKRN3 auto-ubiquitination (Supplementary Fig. 2D). UBCH5A was thus selected for the in vitro ubiquitination assay. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 2E, after 15 min of incubation, diagnostic ladders of bands appeared above unmodified MKRN3 in both immunoblots and Coommassie Blue gel staining, which were representative of ubiquitinated MKRN3, as they could be efficiently eliminated by treatment with USP2cc, the catalytic core of human deubiquitinase USP2. It was thus clear that wild-type MKRN3, like many other RING-type E3 ligases [25], could undergo auto-ubiquitination. When similar in vitro ubiquitination reactions were performed with either wild-type MKRN3 or the indicated mutants, it was evident that all four disease-causing mutations compromised the auto-ubiquitination of MKRN3 (Fig. 2D). Further mass-spectrum analysis revealed the side chains of multiple Lys (K) residues as the sites for MKRN3 auto-ubiquitination (Fig. 2E). As shown in Fig. 2F, the CPP-associated mutants did undergo less, although varying, ubiquitination than wild-type MKRN3. These data suggest that the CPP-causing mutations might stabilize MKRN3 protein through impairing their E3 ligase activity, resulting in less auto-ubiquitination and slower proteasome-mediated degradation. Compared to wild-type MKRN3, the introduction of CPP-causing MKRN3 mutants also led to weaker suppression of the transcriptional activity of the GNRH1 promoter (Fig. 2G). There thus appeared to be an association between the E3 ligase activity of MKRN3 and its ability to suppress GNRH1-promoter-driven gene expression.
MKRN3 interacts with and ubiquitinates MBD3
Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening was performed to identify a potential substrate(s) for the E3 ligase MKRN3. MKRN3 was used as the bait to screen potential MKRN3-interacting proteins from a Y2H prey library containing over 15 000 human open reading frames (ORFs) [26]. Positive colonies were selected for sequencing and MBD3 emerged as a potential MKRN3-interacting partner. An MKRN3–MBD3 interaction was confirmed by survival assay in yeast SD-Leu-Trp-His-Ura (SD-4) selection medium, as well as a plate-based staining assay of β-galactosidase activities (Fig. 3A). MKRN3 and MBD3 proteins, either endogenously or exogenously expressed, co-immunoprecipitated (Co-IP) with each other, indicating that they could form a complex in vivo (Fig. 3B and C). GST pull-down assays showed that MKRN3 directly interacted with MBD3 in vitro (Fig. 3D) and both the N- and C-termini of MKRN3 were implicated in the interaction with the MBD domain in MBD3 (Fig. 3E and Supplementary Fig. 3A and B). MKRN3 and MBD3, tagged with green fluorescence protein and red fluorescence protein, respectively, co-localized in the nuclear region of the cell (Supplementary Fig. 3C). Interestingly, the four CPP-causing mutations in MKRN3 seemed to have little or no effect on the interaction between MKRN3–MBD3 (Supplementary Fig. 3D), suggesting that these mutations might cause CPP through mechanisms other than directly affecting the MKRN3–MBD3 interaction.
In vitro ubiquitination reactions were assembled containing recombinant MKRN3 and MBD3 proteins as E3 ligase and substrate, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3F, MKRN3 was able to conjugate poly-Ub chains onto MBD3 in vitro. Endogenous MBD3 in HEK293T cells also underwent ubiquitination, as assessed by anti-MBD3-based immunoprecipitation and subsequent immunoblotting analysis using anti-Ub (Fig. 3G). An in vivo ubiquitination assay was then performed with tagged MKRN3 and MBD3 in HEK293T cells (Fig. 3H). While genetic ablation of MKRN3 markedly reduced the ubiquitination of endogenous MBD3, the reintroduction of MKRN3 into MKRN3−/− HEK293T cells led to much increased ubiquitination of MBD3 (Fig. 3I). Consistently, endogenous MBD3 underwent less ubiquitination in the brains of MKRN3m+/p− mice at the age of 15 days compared to that of age-matched wild-type littermates (Fig. 3J).
Altogether, these data suggested that MBD3 emerged as a physiological substrate for MKRN3.
MKRN3 mediates the non-proteolytic ubiquitination of MBD3 at multiple sites
Mass-spectrum analysis revealed that MKRN3 conjugated poly-Ub chains onto the side chains of 10 Lys residues in MBD3 (K41, K90, K109, K124, K129, K142, K157, K163, K216 and K227) in vitro. Further in vivo ubiquitination assays indicated that five Lys residues (K41, K129, K163, K216 and K227) were major sites in MBD3 for MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination, as these MBD3 mutants bear Lys-to-Arg (K-to-R) substitutions at the indicated positions, individually or simultaneously on all five sites that generated MBD35KR, were less ubiquitinated in HEK293T cells expressing Flag-tagged MKRN3 (Fig. 4A). These five ubiquitination sites were conserved in the MKRN3 proteins of different origins (Supplementary Fig. 4A).
Interestingly, MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination of MBD3 seemed to have little or no effect on the stability of MBD3 (Fig. 4A). An in vivo ubiquitination assay with HA-tagged Ub that was either wild type, a Ub mutant that bore K-to-R mutations at all seven Lys (K) residues (KO) or those bearing K-to-R mutations at all Lys residues except one intact Lys only at the indicated residue (K6, K11, K27, K29, K33, K48, K63) indicated that MKRN3-conjugated poly-Ub chains on MBD3 were mainly in K27 linkage (Supplementary Fig. 4B), one type of poly-Ub chain that typically does not lead to degradation [27–30]. This was further confirmed by an in vivo ubiquitination assay with an HA-tagged Ub mutant bearing a K-to-R mutation at Lys27 (K27R), which was only poorly conjugated by MKRN3 onto MBD3 (Fig. 4B).
CPP-causing mutations in MKRN3 impair its ligase activity towards MBD3
Having discovered that CPP-causing mutations compromised the auto-ubiquitination of MKRN3 (Fig. 2F), we went on to ask whether the ubiquitination of MBD3 might also be affected. As shown in Fig. 4C and Supplementary Fig. 4C, all four CPP-causing mutants conjugated poly-Ub chains onto MBD3 much less efficiently than wild-type MKRN3 both in vitro and in vivo. Similar results were also observed with seven disease-causing truncated mutations of MKRN3 (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. 4D). These data strongly suggested that the disease-causing mutations could indeed impair the E3 ligase activity of MKRN3 and had little or no effect on the stability of MBD3 protein.
MBD3 ubiquitination is also compromised in cells derived from CPP patients
Recently, a novel mutation (exon1: c.379_398del: p.T128Afs*10) was found in the MKRN3 gene of a proband with CPP and the immediate family members (Fig. 4D and Supplementary Fig. 4E; see more details in Supplementary Table 1). The proband was a girl (I) with a heterozygous MKRN3 mutation; her father (II) was a carrier of the mutant allele with no history of CPP; the mother (III) was unaffected; the paternal grandmother (IV) had a history of CPP, whereas the paternal grandfather was unaffected (V). Blood samples were collected from the members of this family, with genomic DNA extracted and subjected to exon sequencing of MKRN3. Additionally, blood samples were also collected from two healthy children with wild-type MKRN3 from unrelated families. The B lymphocytes of the collected samples were then separated and immortalized using an Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-based approach. An in vivo ubiquitination assay was then performed to determine the ubiquitination states of endogenous MBD3 in the cells derived from the patients with CPP, unaffected family members or unrelated apparently healthy controls. As shown in Fig. 4E, MBD3 in cells derived from the CPP patients (I, IV) underwent less ubiquitination than those from the unaffected family members (II, III) or healthy controls.
MKRN3-mediated MBD3 ubiquitination suppresses GNRH1 expression
To further address the functional consequences of this newly discovered MKRN3–MBD3 interaction, we next assessed the effects of MBD3 and MKRN3 on GNRH1 expression. As shown in Fig. 5A, a luciferase reporter assay indicated that exogenous expression of MBD3 increased GNRH1 promoter-driven transcription by 2.2-fold over control, suggesting an activating effect of MBD3 on GNRH1 transcription. However, such a transcription-activating effect by MBD3 was markedly reduced when MKRN3 was co-introduced into the cells, suggesting that MKRN3 could suppress MBD3-activated GNRH1 transcription. We next asked whether endogenous MBD3 was required for the inhibitory role of MKRN3 on GNRH1 promoter activity, by constructing MBD3-deficient (MBD3−/−) HEK293T cells (Supplementary Fig. 5A). As shown in Fig. 5B, MKRN3 repressed the GNRH1 promoter-driven transcription of firefly luciferase only in HEK293T cells that expressed endogenous MBD3 but not in those cells (MBD3−/−) deficient of endogenous MBD3, strongly suggesting a requirement for endogenous MBD3 for MKRN3 to repress GNRH1 transcription.
Interestingly, MBD35KR, the MBD3 mutant that bore Lys-to-Arg (K-to-R) substitutions at all five major sites for MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination, was able to activate Gnrh1 promoter-driven transcription as efficiently as wild-type MBD3. However, unlike wild-type MBD3, transcriptional activation by MBD35KR was no longer susceptible to MKRN3-mediated repression (Fig. 5C), suggesting that MKRN3-conjugated poly-Ub chains at the five sites in MBD3 were primarily responsible for mediating the suppressing effect of MKRN3 on GNRH1 transcription. As shown in Fig. 2G, 4C and Supplementary Fig. 4C, the four CPP-causing MKRN3 missense mutants, which poorly ubiquitinated MBD3, only exhibited a marginal inhibitory effect on MBD3-activated GNRH1 expression when compared to that by wild-type MKRN3, suggesting a potential link between impaired MBD3 ubiquitination and weakened suppression of GnRH1 production in CPP patients.
MKRN3-mediated MBD3 ubiquitination promotes DNA methylation through disrupting the binding of MBD3 to 5hmC-containing DNA or the recruitment of TET2 to the GNRH1 promoter
To further pinpoint how MKRN3-mediated MBD3 ubiquitination might regulate gene expression, a ChIP-seq assay was performed with wild-type HEK293T cells, using anti-MBD3 antibody. As shown in Fig. 6A, by classifying the reads from MBD3-bound DNA, MBD3-bound DNAs were all over different structural regions in the human genome, with 46.15% in intergenic regions, 22.19% in introns, 18.34% in promoters, 7.10% in exons, 2.96% in 5′-UTRs and 2.07% in transcription termination sites. These data were consistent with the previous reports that MBD3, unlike MBD2, was not enriched in non-coding chromosomal regions [15–18,31,32]. The MBD3-bound genomic loci significantly overlapped with 5hmC-rich or TET2-bound (82.5%) regions, as determined by the cross-analyses of previously published ChIP-seq data for MBD3 and TET2 (see additional details in the ‘Methods’ section), suggesting possible associations between MBD3 and TET2 in activating the transcription of a large set of genes in mammalian genomes (Supplementary Fig. 6A). Pathway analyses further indicated that many development- or reproduction-related pathways were enriched in these MBD3-bound hits (Table 1). Notably, a fragment of sequence corresponding to the human GNRH1 promoter was identified in these MBD3-bound peaks (Supplementary Fig. 6B). Subsequently, ChIP-qPCR (quantitative PCR) assays were carried out with HEK293T or MKRN3−/– HEK293T-expressing wild-type MKRN3 or the C340G mutant, to determine whether endogenous MBD3 protein indeed bound to the human GNRH1 promoter region. Using primers (F2R2) to amplify DNA spanning −1716 to −1541 bp of the GNRH1 promoter, in MKRN3−/− HEK293T cells, anti-MBD3 antibodies enriched DNAs from the GNRH1 promoter to an ∼1.7-fold greater extent than from wild-type HEK293T cells; however, such an effect was completely reversed when wild-type MKRN3 was reintroduced into MKRN3−/− cells, but not the enzymatically dead MKRN3 (C340G) mutant (mutant H) (Fig. 6B and Supplementary Fig. 6C). In mouse, MBD3 seemed to preferentially bind to the −1000 to −1 region of the Gnrh1 promoter (using primers f1r1 for −507 to −388 bp) in GT1–7 cells (Supplementary Fig. 6D). In primarily dissected hypothalamic neurons of wild-type C57BL/6 mice, the binding of MBD3 to the Gnrh1 promoter was substantially increased during development, while Mkrn3 expression declined rapidly (Supplementary Fig. 6E, 1C and D). Loss of Mkrn3 promotes the binding of endogenous MBD3 to the Gnrh1 promoter at postnatal day 15 (Fig. 6C). These data strongly suggested that an intact E3 ligase activity of MKRN3 towards MBD3 negatively regulates MBD3 binding to the GNRH1 promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) were also performed with recombinant human MBD3 protein and DNA probes that had sequences derived from the human GNRH1 promoter (−1716 to −1541 bp) with unmodified (C), 5′-methylated (5mC) or 5′-hydroxymethylated Cytosine (5hmC). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 6F, MBD3 preferentially bound to 5hmC-containing DNA, with less binding to unmodified DNA and no binding to 5mC-containing DNA. The specificity of MBD3 binding to the GNRH1 promoter was further confirmed, as the binding of MBD3 to the 32P-labeled probe could be effectively competed with by unlabeled 5hmC-containing DNA of the same sequence and, to a lesser extent, by the same amount of unmodified DNA, but almost not at all by 5mC-containing DNA in 10-fold excess (Supplementary Fig. 6F). These results strongly supported the notion that endogenous MBD3 might predominantly bind to 5hmC-containing DNA. As shown in Fig. 6D, the binding of MBD3 to the 5hmC-containing DNA probe of the sequence derived from the GNRH1 promoter was markedly compromised upon MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination in vitro.
Table 1.
Pathway | Gene_enriched | Count |
---|---|---|
Sex_reproduction_pathways | ||
GnRH-signaling pathway | GNRH1,KRAS,PRKCB | 3 |
Estrogen-signaling pathway | KRAS,PIK3CB | 2 |
Ovarian steroidogenesis | CYP1B1,INSR | 2 |
Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation | KRAS,CDC27,PIK3CB | 3 |
Prolactin-signaling pathway | CCND1,KRAS,SOCS5,PIK3CB | 4 |
Oxytocin-signaling pathway | CCND1,KRAS,PRKCB,CDKN1A,PRKAB2,PIK3CB,KCNJ4 | 7 |
Skeleton_related_pathways | ||
Osteoclast differentiation | TAB2,FYN,PIK3CB | 3 |
Previously, it was reported that MBD3 interacted with TET2 and promoted the demethylase activity of TET2 [19]. Consistently, TET2 seemed to strongly interact with MBD3 in HEK293T cells with much stronger affinity, compared to TET1 or TET3 (Supplementary Fig. 6G). Additional immunoprecipitation assay revealed the C-terminal region of TET2 (residues 1099–1912) and the C-terminal region of MBD3 (residues 91–291) as the interacting domains (Supplementary Fig. 6H and I). As shown in Fig. 6E, Co-IP experiments with anti-MBD3 indicated that endogenous MBD3 protein indeed interacted with TET2 in both WT and MKRN3−/− HEK293T cells, but the MBD3-TET2 interaction appeared to be significantly stronger in the absence of endogenous MKRN3. Furthermore, this interaction was much reduced by the reintroduction of wild-type MKRN3, but not by the enzymatically dead MKRN3 (C340G, mutant H). Remarkably, in MKRN3−/−MBD3−/− cells expressing MBD35KR (which was a defect for MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination), the MBD3–TET2 interaction was not affected, regardless of the presence of either wild-type MKRN3 or its C340G mutant (Fig. 6F).
Taken together, MKRN3-mediated MBD3 ubiquitination seemed to negatively regulate the affinity of MBD3 for both 5hmC-containing DNA and TET2 demethylase. Obviously, when endogenous MKRN3 is physiologically silenced after puberty
initiation, or its functionality is pathologically compromised by CPP-causing mutations, the MBD3 interaction with TET2 and 5hmC DNA could promote the demethylation of cytosine in the GNRH1 promoter, activating GNRH1 transcription.
MKRN3 deficiency promotes DNA demethylation in the hypothalamus of mice
The contents of 5hmC within genomic DNAs (gDNA) in mouse hypothalamus increased significantly from postnatal day 9 to day 30, while Mkrn3 expression decreased (Supplementary Fig. 6J and 1D). Compared to that of the wild-type mice, genetic ablation of Mkrn3 seemed to markedly (by 2- to 3-fold) increase the hypothalamic 5hmC contents from Mkrn3m+/p− mice while reducing rhw 5mC content (by 4- to 5-fold) in genomic DNA, as revealed by DNA dot-blotting assay using anti-5mC or anti-5hmC antibodies (Fig. 6G). To more specifically determine the effect of Mkrn3 on the methylation status of the Gnrh1 promoter, genomic DNA was extracted from the hypothalamus of 15-day-old wild-type and Mkrn3m+/p− mice and subjected to mDIP (methylated DNA immunoprecipitation) using antibodies that specifically recognize and enrich either 5mC or 5hmC-containing DNAs. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was then performed with the enriched DNA, using primers to amplify −822 to −659 bp of the Gnrh1 promoter, to assess the effect of hypothalamic Mkrn3 deficiency on the relative 5mC and 5hmC content in mouse hypothalamus. As shown in Fig. 6H, Mkrn3 deficiency resulted in an ∼50% increase in the 5hmC content and a 35% decrease in the 5mC content of the Gnrh1 promoter in the mouse hypothalamus. Consistently, MKRN3−/− HEK293T cells also showed higher 5hmC and lower 5mC content in the GNRH1 promoter (−1785 to −1541 bp) compared to those of wild-type HEK293T cells; however, such an effect could be efficiently reversed through the reintroduction of wild-type MKRN3, but not the enzymatically dead MKRN3 (C340G, mutant H) (Supplementary Fig. 6K). Additionally, MBD3 and TET2 synergistically activated Gnrh1 expression in the mouse GnRH neuron-derived GT1–7 cells (Fig. 6I). Therefore, MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination did seem to
negatively impact the GnRH production by promoting DNA methylation in mammalian GNRH1 promoters.
DISCUSSION
MKRN3 has been proposed to act as an upstream inhibitor of mammalian puberty, but the underlying mechanisms remained undetermined [8,9,33–37]. Recently, hypothalamic microRNA, miR-30b, was found to repress MKRN3 expression through interaction with 3′-UTR of MKRN3 mRNA and blocking miR-30b in juvenile female mice increased MKRN3 gene expression and delayed puberty development, which again underscored the importance of MKRN3 in regulating puberty development [38]. Here, through both the phenotypical characterization of a newly constructed Mkrn3 knockout mouse strain (Fig. 1D–K and Supplementary Fig. 1G–M) and a direct cell-based assay of the suppressive effect of MKRN3 on GNRH1 promoter activity (Fig. 1L), our work has first established Mkrn3 as an authentic physiological regulator of puberty onset and suppressor of GnRH1 production in mice. Bessa et al. reported that paternally inherited MKRN3 mutations in humans did not totally abolish its puberty brake and the effects can be quite subtle, especially in boys [39], but there seemed to be no obviously sex-dependent differences in the puberty phenotype observed in our mouse study. What might account for this apparent discrepancy between mouse and human studies? First, Mkrn3 was genetically ablated in the mice used in our work, while male patients in above mentioned study were bearing different mutations in the MKRN3 gene; moreover, mice used here were of a relatively pure genetic background (C57), while the human subjects in the above study almost inevitably had heterogeneous genetic backgrounds.
Furthermore, we demonstrated that MKRN3 protein did exhibit E3 ligase activity and undergo auto-ubiquitination followed by proteasome-dependent degradation, both of which could be impaired by disease-causing mutations (Fig. 2B–F). These findings revealed auto-ubiquitination as a novel feedback mechanism in controlling the homeostasis of MKRN3 as an important brake in controlling the hypothalamic switch of the puberty regulator.
We next identified methyl-CpG-binding MBD3 protein as a physiological substrate for the E3 ligase activity of MKRN3. We further showed that MKRN3 conjugated non-proteolytic K27-linked poly-Ub chains onto multiple sites in MBD3. Among the ubiquitination sites, K41 resided in the methyl-CpG-binding domain of MBD3 and the ubiquitination of this site might molecularly underscore how MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination disrupts the binding of MBD3 to the 5hmC-containing GNRH1 promoter. The other major sites for such ubiquitination (K129, K163, K216 and K227) are located primarily in the C-terminal fragment of MBD3—a region directly involved in MBD3–TET2 interaction (Supplementary Fig. 6H and I), suggesting that such polyubiquitination of MBD3 would compromise MBD3–TET2 interaction (Fig. 6E and F). In light of a previous report that MBD3 promotes the DNA oxidase activity of TET2 [19] and our findings that MBD3 and TET2 synergistically activate GNRH1 gene expression (Fig. 6I), the reduced affinity of MBD3 for TET2 upon MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination would not only result in substantially lower 5hmC content in mammalian genomes, but also compromise the binding of MBD3 to its target loci that include the GNRH1 promoter. These two mechanisms would concertedly ensure the suppressive effect of MKRN3 on GNRH1 expression and thereby inhibit pubertal initiation. This MKRN3-imposed repression of GNRH1 expression would be lost when the action of MKRN3 was impaired through loss-of-function mutations reported in patients with CPP [8,36] (Fig. 2G). Moreover, wild-type MKRN3 failed to suppress GNRH1 transcription in cells that have endogenous MBD3 genetically ablated (Fig. 5B), suggesting the existence and synergy of the MKRN3–MBD3 complex in regulating the hypothalamic trigger of pubertal initiation. Finally, it was important to note that the ubiquitination-deficient MBD3 mutant (MBD35KR) could activate the GNRH1 promoter even in the presence of co-expressed MKRN3 (Fig. 5C), directly underscoring the critical importance of MKRN3-mediated ubiquitination of MBD3 in suppressing GNRH1 expression. Therefore, to precisely program puberty initiation in mammals, the homeostasis and functionality of both MKRN3 and MBD3 need to be delicately controlled in mammalian GnRH neurons to ensure the timely activation of GNRH1 expression in the hypothalamus (Fig. 6J).
Notably, MBD3 preferentially bound to the GNRH1 promoter at 5hmC status over that which bears 5mC or is unmodified (Fig. 6D and Supplementary Fig. 6F) and promoted GNRH1 transcription, suggesting a specific role for MBD3 in promoting rather than suppressing gene expression. This went a step further from the previous findings that MBD3-bound gene loci highly overlapped with 5hmC-rich chromosomal regions [15,17,19,22,40,41], which might mechanistically underlie why MBD3 mutations or aberrances in the 5hmC distribution pattern were associated with human disease, including cancer [21,42–46] and ASD [20,47]. Finally, our work has clearly demonstrated that post-translational modifications such as ubiquitination may distinctly impact the functionality of MBD3 and account for the apparently opposite roles of MBD3 in regulating cell pluripotency [23,24], suggesting yet another layer of regulation for epigenetic programming in mammals with meaningful functional consequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For details, see supplementary data.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We specifically acknowledge the excellent support from the proteomics facility (led by Drs. Chao Peng and Chaolan Huang) at the National Center for Protein Science, Shanghai, and thank Dr. Wei Bian's team in the Cell Biology Core Facility of SIBCB for their excellent support in imaging. We are particularly thankful to U. Kaiser of Harvard Medical School for discussion. We thank Dr. Yalan Wu and all other members of the laboratory for their generous support.
Funding
This work was supported by funding from the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB19000000 and XDA12040323), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91853128, 31470770 and 81525019 to R.H.; 81773023 to S.G.), the model animal project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (19140903500) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFA082103 and 2018ZX10101004) to R.H. This work was also supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M642109), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31900804) to C.L. and supported by the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2017SHZDZX01).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
R.H. and S.G. designed and supervised the whole project. C.L., W.L., Z.L., J.W., Z.H., G.R., T.H., P.C., Y.G. and M.Y. performed most of the experiments; L.Y., X.H. and X.Z. performed and analysed the ChIP-seq data; W.W. and Y.L. provided advice on experiments. R.H., C.L. and S.G. drafted the manuscript, with the final version approved by all authors.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Gajdos ZK, Hirschhorn JN, Palmert MR. What controls the timing of puberty? An update on progress from genetic investigation. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2009; 16: 16–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Abreu AP, Kaiser UB. Pubertal development and regulation. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4: 254–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Day FR, Helgason H, Chasman DIet al. . Physical and neurobehavioral determinants of reproductive onset and success. Nat Genet 2016; 48: 617–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Golub MS, Collman GW, Foster PMet al. . Public health implications of altered puberty timing. Pediatrics 2008; 121: S218–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bessa DS, Maschietto M, Aylwin CFet al. . Methylome profiling of healthy and central precocious puberty girls. Clin Epigenet 2018; 10: 146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Toro CA, Aylwin CF, Lomniczi A. Hypothalamic epigenetics driving female puberty. J Neuroendocrinol 2018; 30: e12589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Aylwin CF, Toro CA, Shirtcliff Eet al. . Emerging genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying pubertal maturation in adolescence. J Res Adolesc 2019; 29: 54–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Abreu AP, Dauber A, Macedo DBet al. . Central precocious puberty caused by mutations in the imprinted gene MKRN3. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2467–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yaqub F. MKRN3 and central precocious puberty. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013; 1: s15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pastor WA, Aravind L, Rao A. TETonic shift: biological roles of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013; 14: 341–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. He YF, Li BZ, Li Zet al. . Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 2011; 333: 1303–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zhang RR, Cui QY, Murai Ket al. . Tet1 regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognition. Cell Stem Cell 2013; 13: 237–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Shen L, Zhang Y. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine: generation, fate, and genomic distribution. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013; 25: 289–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hendrich B, Abbott C, McQueen Het al. . Genomic structure and chromosomal mapping of the murine and human Mbd1, Mbd2, Mbd3, and Mbd4 genes. Mamm Genome 1999; 10: 906–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Menafra R, Stunnenberg HG. MBD2 and MBD3: elusive functions and mechanisms. Front Genet 2014; 5: 428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Baubec T, Ivanek R, Lienert Fet al. . Methylation-dependent and -independent genomic targeting principles of the MBD protein family. Cell 2013; 153: 480–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Yildirim O, Li R, Hung JHet al. . Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2011; 147: 1498–510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Brown SE, Suderman MJ, Hallett Met al. . DNA demethylation induced by the methyl-CpG-binding domain protein MBD3. Gene 2008; 420: 99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Peng L, Li Y, Xi Yet al. . MBD3L2 promotes Tet2 enzymatic activity for mediating 5-methylcytosine oxidation. J Cell Sci 2016; 129: 1059–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cukier HN, Rabionet R, Konidari Iet al. . Novel variants identified in methyl-CpG-binding domain genes in autistic individuals. Neurogenetics 2010; 11: 291–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sansom OJ, Maddison K, Clarke AR. Mechanisms of disease: methyl-binding domain proteins as potential therapeutic targets in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2007; 4: 305–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hainer SJ, McCannell KN, Yu Jet al. . DNA methylation directs genomic localization of Mbd2 and Mbd3 in embryonic stem cells. Elife 2016; 5: e21964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rais Y, Zviran A, Geula Set al. . Deterministic direct reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. Nature 2013; 502: 65–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. dos Santos RL, Tosti L, Radzisheuskaya Aet al. . MBD3/NuRD facilitates induction of pluripotency in a context-dependent manner. Cell Stem Cell 2014; 15: 102–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 2009; 78: 399–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Liu Z, Chen P, Gao Het al. . Ubiquitylation of autophagy receptor Optineurin by HACE1 activates selective autophagy for tumor suppression. Cancer Cell 2014; 26: 106–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Iwai K, Tanaka K. Ubiquitin chain elongation: an intriguing strategy. Mol Cell 2014; 56: 189–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 1998; 67: 425–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kerscher O, Felberbaum R, Hochstrasser M. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2006; 22: 159–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Husnjak K, Dikic I. Ubiquitin-binding proteins: decoders of ubiquitin-mediated cellular functions. Annu Rev Biochem 2012; 81: 291–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cui J, Duan B, Zhao Xet al. . MBD3 mediates epigenetic regulation on EPAS1 promoter in cancer. Tumor Biol 2016; 37: 13455–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chen Y, Damayanti NP, Irudayaraj Jet al. . Diversity of two forms of DNA methylation in the brain. Front Genet 2014; 5: 46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Latronico AC, Brito VN, Carel JC. Causes, diagnosis, and treatment of central precocious puberty. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4: 265–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Shin YL. An update on the genetic causes of central precocious puberty. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2016; 21: 66–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Abreu AP, Macedo DB, Brito VNet al. . A new pathway in the control of the initiation of puberty: the MKRN3 gene. J Mol Endocrinol 2015; 54: R131–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Schreiner F, Gohlke B, Hamm Met al. . MKRN3 Mutations in familial central precocious puberty. Horm Res Paediatr 2014; 82: 122–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lu W, Wang J, Li Cet al. . A novel mutation in 5'-UTR of Makorin ring finger 3 gene associated with the familial precocious puberty. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2018; 50: 1291–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Heras V, Sangiao-Alvarellos S, Manfredi-Lozano Met al. . Hypothalamic miR-30 regulates puberty onset via repression of the puberty-suppressing factor, Mkrn3. PLoS Biol 2019; 17: e3000532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bessa DS, Macedo DB, Brito VNet al. . High frequency of MKRN3 mutations in male central precocious puberty previously classified as idiopathic. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 105: 17–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zhang L, Zheng Y, Sun Yet al. . MiR-134-Mbd3 axis regulates the induction of pluripotency. J Cell Mol Med 2016; 20: 1150–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Roloff TC, Ropers HH, Nuber UA. Comparative study of methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins. BMC Genomics 2003; 4: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Du Q, Luu PL, Stirzaker Cet al. . Methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins: readers of the epigenome. Epigenomics 2015; 7: 1051–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Zhu Y, Harrison DJ, Bader SA. Genetic and epigenetic analyses of MBD3 in colon and lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 1972–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Montoya Get al. . The affinity of different MBD proteins for a specific methylated locus depends on their intrinsic binding properties. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 1765–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. El-Osta A, Kantharidis P, Zalcberg JRet al. . Precipitous release of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 and histone deacetylase 1 from the methylated human multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) on activation. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22: 1844–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lorincz MC, Schubeler D, Groudine M. Methylation-mediated proviral silencing is associated with MeCP2 recruitment and localized histone H3 deacetylation. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21: 7913–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. St Pourcain B, Whitehouse AJ, Ang WQet al. . Common variation contributes to the genetic architecture of social communication traits. Mol Autism 2013; 4: 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.