Skip to main content
JACC Case Reports logoLink to JACC Case Reports
. 2019 Dec 18;1(4):495–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.08.029

Hybrid Mitral Valve Replacement

A Heart-Team Approach to Severe Mitral Annular Calcification

Javier G Castillo 1,, Gilbert HL Tang 1, David H Adams 1, Ahmed El-Eshmawi 1
PMCID: PMC8289150  PMID: 34316863

Abstract

Mitral annular calcification tends to be significant in patients of advanced age or with underlying processes such as increased mechanical stress. When severe, it can significantly affect perioperative outcomes, especially if mitral decalcification is required for success. This report describes a versatile heart-team approach to a very complex condition. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Key Words: hybrid, mitral annular calcification, mitral valve disease, mitral valve replacement, transcatheter valve replacement

Abbreviations and Acronyms: MAC, mitral annular calcification

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg


Mitral annular calcification tends to be significant in patients of advanced age or with underlying processes such as increased mechanical stress…

History of Presentation

The patient was an active 68-year-old woman who presented to a local emergency department with worsening dyspnea and very limited ambulatory capacity. Additional symptoms included easy fatigue, occasional palpitations, and orthopnea.

Learning Objectives

  • Operators should be able to plan therapeutic strategies in patients with severe MAC.

  • Operators should understand the role of a hybrid approach in surgical patients requiring high-risk techniques.

Medical History

Medical history included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus on oral medication, and morbid obesity (weight 102 kg, height 154 cm, body mass index 42.6 kg/m2). On examination, she was normotensive (125/83 mm Hg), with a regular pulse of 62 beats/min, with no significant findings other than jugular venous distention and peripheral edema. Cardiac auscultation revealed a regular rate and rhythm, a faint first heart sound, a loud second heart sound, and a classic mid-diastolic rumbling murmur with pre-systolic accentuation best heard over the apex. Pulmonary auscultation revealed bilateral rales.

Differential Diagnosis

Although our patient had a very straightforward diagnosis, particularly after echocardiography, the differential diagnosis can include prosthetic valve obstruction, large left atrial myxoma, or, in very rare occasions, cor triatriatum.

Investigations

Echocardiography showed severe mitral valve stenosis (mitral valve area 1.1 cm2, diastolic pressure half-time 157 ms), moderate mitral valve regurgitation (type IIIA dysfunction secondary to bileaflet restriction), and severe left atrial enlargement (area 30 cm2). There was severe mitral annular calcification (MAC), which completely engulfed the posterior leaflet, thus freezing the leaflet hinge. The anterior leaflet was partially pliable, with concentered calcification foci. Of note, the areas of calcification (pebble-like shape) protruded into the left ventricular outflow tract. The posteromedial commissure was severely fibrotic and fused. Left and right ventricular function and dimensions were preserved. Narrowing of the left ventricular outflow tract was seen, due to a small left ventricular cavity and extensive calcification of the aortomitral curtain. A large pericardial effusion was noted (Figures 1A to 1D, Videos 1, 2, and 3). Computed tomography confirmed echocardiographic findings. The coronary calcium score was found to be 2 (representing the 53rd percentile adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity). The maximal pulmonary artery diameter was 3.1 cm (Figures 2A to 2F). Cardiac catherization demonstrated right dominance, nonobstructive coronary artery disease (30% stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery), and moderate pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure 41 mm Hg).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiograms

(A) Severe left atrial enlargement, mitral calcification with reduced valve area, and small ventricular capacity. (B) Doppler imaging shows near critical mitral stenosis and moderate mitral regurgitation. (C) Severe mitral annular calcification along the posterior mitral annulus extending to the posterior leaflet and commissures. Calcification of the anterior leaflet and mitroaortic curtain leads to a pebble-like deposit or shelf of calcium protruding into the left ventricular outflow tract. (D) Three-dimensional echocardiography shows massive calcification of the posterior leaflet and 2 areas of calcification along the anterior leaflet. See Videos 1, 2, and 3.

Online Video 1.

Download video file (437.2KB, mp4)

Two-Dimensional Pre-Operative Transesophageal Echocardiography

Online Video 2.

Download video file (428.5KB, mp4)

Two-Dimensional Pre-Operative Transesophageal Echocardiography

Online Video 3.

Download video file (473.4KB, mp4)

Three-Dimensional Pre-Operative Transesophageal Echocardiography

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Computed Tomography

(A,B) Severe left atrial enlargement, mitral calcification with reduced valve area, and small ventricular capacity. (B) Doppler imaging shows severe mitral stenosis with almost critical mitral stenosis and moderate mitral regurgitation. (C,D) Severe mitral annular calcification along the posterior mitral annulus extending to the posterior leaflet and commissures. (E) Calcification of the anterior leaflet and mitroaortic curtain leads to a pebble-like deposit or shelf of calcium protruding into the left ventricular outflow tract. (F) Three-dimensional echocardiography shows massive calcification of the posterior leaflet and 2 areas of calcification in the anterior leaflet.

Management

According to current guidelines, the severity of disease, the presence of symptoms and moderate mitral regurgitation, a nonfavorable valve morphology (Wilkins score 14) for percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy, and the relative absence of surgical risk represent a Class I indication for surgical intervention. At surgery, a mini-sternotomy was performed to open the chest, and the heart was arrested using antegrade and retrograde cold blood cardioplegia. The mitral valve was exposed through Sondergaard’s groove. Valve analysis revealed a chronic severe calcification of the posterior annulus that engulfed the leaflet hinge and extended toward the posterior leaflet and the subvalvular apparatus (Figure 3A). Given the impossibility of driving needles through the annulus (even when trying deep infra-annular ventricular bites), the only option was annular en bloc decalcification and ventriculoplasty, which may carry up to 5% mortality in very expert hands. After a rapid heart-team discussion, a decision was made to assess hybrid options. Using standard Epic valve sizers (Abbott–St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, Minnesota) with 120° markings, a 26-mm Edwards SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) was chosen. The anterior leaflet was partially resected, sparing calcified areas to facilitate prosthetic anchoring. In addition, 4 pledgeted sutures (2-0 polyethylene terephthalate) were placed along the anterior mitral annulus (Figure 3B). The percutaneous valve was prepared with 2 long Teflon felt strips (Figure 3C). The valve was crimped on a deflated balloon following standard techniques and then deployed (Figure 3D). Subsequently, sutures were passed through the Teflon felt strips to further secure the valve (Figure 3E). Intraoperative echocardiography off bypass did not reveal perivalvular leaks or significant left ventricular tract obstruction (Figure 3F). Recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on post-operative day 6. Pre-discharge echocardiography showed a valve gradient of 3 mm Hg, no paravalvular leaks, and no significant left ventricular tract obstruction. Findings on follow-up echocardiography at 3 months were unchanged.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Surgical Analysis and Procedure

(A) Massive mitral annular calcification of both mitral valve leaflets with a pebble-like shelf of calcium protruding into the left ventricular outflow tract. (B) The anterior leaflet has been partially excised. (C) Two strips of Teflon felt are sewn to the sealing skirt with a running 5-0 polypropylene suture. (D,E) The valve is expanded. (F) Sutures are passed through the Teflon felt strips to further anchor and secure the valve.

Discussion

About 10% of patients 70 years of age or older may present with a significant degree of MAC (1). Without question, this represents a very technically demanding challenge because of significant risk for atrioventricular disruption, which in turn may be associated with reported operative mortality as high as 75%. Although conventional surgery can be successfully performed with mild degrees of MAC, circumferential or advanced degrees of MAC frequently require adjunct techniques or procedures, and outcomes are exponentially worse (2). In this context, transcatheter approaches have been increasingly proposed in patients with severe MAC and a high surgical risk profile. However, severe limitations, including potential left ventricular tract obstruction and difficulties to securely anchor the prosthesis, have led to important increased periprocedural morbidity and mortality (3). Therefore, a hybrid approach to severe MAC, open implantation of a balloon-expandable valve, has recently emerged, whether as a planned procedure or as a bailout solution (4). Russell et al. (4) provided a detailed description of hybrid transatrial mitral valve replacement using a balloon-expandable valve that served well as a scaffold for surgical and procedural variations for the heart team. This series not only demonstrated that open delivery of a balloon-expandable prosthesis in the mitral position can be achieved safely with similar hemodynamic results but also served as a proof that very high risk surgical patients with challenging lesions can be successfully treated. However, unlike in our current case, the investigators were able to place sutures circumferentially with Teflon felt pledgets on the atrial side. In the present case, as shown, the calcium was left behind and used as an anchor for the prosthesis.

The following are key considerations for the heart team. 1) Excise the anterior leaflet completely or partially (only the ventricular end to avoid obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract), depending on the degree of calcification. Calcium is often preferred to securely anchor thee percutaneous valve if sutures cannot be placed because of severe circumferential MAC. 2) Although size can be determined using pre-operative computed tomography, we recommend intraoperative sizing with standard valve sizers. Mark the commissures 120° apart with a surgical marking pen so that 2 of these subtend the left ventricular outflow tract. 3) If there is no fusion of at least 1 of the commissures, posteromedial commissural closure is advised to achieve a more circumferential geometry of the mitral valve and avoid potential paravalvular leaks. 4) Pledgeted annular sutures should be placed wherever possible to further secure the valve. 5) The Edwards SAPIEN 3 Ultra transcatheter valve is prepared by applying 2 long Teflon felt strips around the sealing skirt with a running 5-0 polypropylene suture. 6) The commissures of the valve are marked over the Teflon felt strip 120° apart with a surgical marking pen. 7) Crimp the valve and lower it into position, considering potential foreshortening. 8) After expanding the valve, pass previously placed annular sutures through the Teflon felt strips.

Follow-Up

Findings on follow-up echocardiography at 3 months were unchanged.

Conclusions

As transcatheter valve therapies continue to expand, hybrid solutions will be increasingly proposed as optimal in high-risk patients with challenging lesions or disease processes. Hybrid mitral valve replacement with a SAPIEN 3 Ultra transcatheter valve in patients with very severe MAC can be safely performed despite challenging anatomy or a high-risk patient profile. A systematic heart-team approach is crucial in such scenarios to achieve success.

Footnotes

The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Informed consent was obtained for this case.

Appendix

For supplemental videos, please see the online version of this paper.

References

  • 1.Fox C.S., Vasan R.S., Parise H. Mitral annular calcification predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107:1492–1496. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000058168.26163.bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saran N., Greason K.L., Schaff H.V. Does mitral valve calcium in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement portend worse survival? Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:444–452. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guerrero M., Urena M., Himbert D. 1-Year outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with severe mitral annular calcification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:1841–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Russell H.M., Guerrero M.E., Salinger M.H. Open atrial transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with mitral annular calcification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1437–1448. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JACC Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES