Abstract
A Gram-stain-positive, strictly aerobic, spore-forming, rod-shaped and non-motile bacterium designated strain SIJ1T was obtained from tidal flat sediment collected from the northern shore of Kuwait Bay, northwest of the Arabian Gulf. Strain SIJ1T grew optimally at 30 °C and pH 7–8 in the presence of 6 % (w/v) NaCl. The cell-wall peptidoglycan was based on meso-diaminopimelic acid and an unsaturated menaquinone with seven isoprene units (MK-7) was the predominant respiratory quinone. It contained anteiso-C15 : 0, iso-C16 : 0 and iso-C15 : 0 as the major fatty acids and ribose as the major whole-cell sugar. The polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, unidentified phospholipid, an unidentified glycolipid, phosphoglycolipid and an unidentified lipid. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA genes revealed that SIJ1T showed a distinct evolutionary lineage within the Firmicutes. The DNA G+C content was 43.1 mol% and the full genome analysis for strain SIJ1T showed that it had a genome size of 3 989 945 bp and contained 4085 predicted protein-encoding genes. The SIJ1T annotated genome showed more stress resistance encoding genes in comparison to its closely related strains. The amino acid identity and average nucleotide identity data for the whole genome proved that strain SIJ1T does indeed represent a novel genus. The strain was distinguishable from the phylogenetically related genera through differences in several phenotypic properties. On the basis of the phenotypic, phylogenetic and genetic data, strain SIJ1T represents a novel genus and species in the family Bacillaceae, for which the name Litoribacterium kuwaitense gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is SIJ1T (=DSM 28862T=LMG 28316T).
Keywords: Litoribacterium kuwaitense, Kuwait, tidal flat, Arabian Gulf, Firmicutes
Introduction
Marine tidal flats shores are interface regions between marine and terrestrial habitats [1]. They are representatives of thalassohaline environments and are highly dynamic systems due to the rapid change in water during high tides [2] and periodic fluctuations in environmental parameters, such as temperature, ion concentration, desiccation, UV-irradiation and wave action [1]. Nevertheless, tidal flat sediments are characterized by high primary production, high microbial activities [3], high sedimentation rate, vertical chemical gradients and gradual decrease in oxygen concentration within a few millimetres below the sediment surface [4]. All these factors participate in the presence of a diverse bacterial community in tidal flat sediment. Various members of the phylum Firmicutes, family Bacillaceae were reported among the tidal flat bacteria [5]. The family Bacillaceae is an ecophysiologically diverse group with members able to survive at different temperature and salinity levels [6]. There are various mechanisms by which the family members can survive such conditions, one of them is the ability to produce compatible solutes such as glycine betaine that functions as a heat, cold and osmosis stress protectant simultaneously [7]. Other compatible solutes have a specific function, such as ectoine, which can act as an osmoprotectant [8] and has many applications in industry and medicine [9]. Here we report Litoribacterium kuwaitense gen. nov., sp. nov., typified by strain SIJ1T, as a new genus of the family Bacillaceae that is rich with stress resistance encoding genes and isolated from a tidal flat of the Arabian Gulf, a water body known for its extreme environmental conditions [10].
Isolation and ecology
In the current study, the taxonomic position of strain SIJ1T, isolated from tidal flat sediment collected from the Sabiya coast (north of Kuwait Bay, Kuwait; northwest Arabian Gulf; 29°34'28.7"N 48°02'09.9"E) was determined. Culturable bacteria were originally isolated from homogenized sediment treated with lysozyme as part of a study targeting isolating Archaea from mudflats shores [11]. One gram of the homogenized sediment samples was serially diluted with 6 % sterile saline (NaCl; equivalent to the salinity level measured at the sampling sites) and diluents of 10−1, 10−3 and 10−5 were used in plating. One hundred microlitres of each diluent was inoculated into modified marine agar (MA) supplemented with vitamins (g l−1: 0.7 KCl, 0.1 KBr, 0.04 SrCl2·6H2O, 0.03 H3BO3, 0.005 NaSiO3·9H2O, 0.003 NaF, 0.002 NH4NO3, 0.001 Fe3PO4·4H2O, 1.013 CaCl2·6H2O, 4.0 Na2SO4, 11.0 MgCl2·6H2O, 60.0 NaCl, 1.0 yeast extract, 5.0 peptone, 10.0 tryptone and 15.0 agar). The pH was adjusted to pH 7.6 and two vitamins were added [0.8 ml of 1 mg ml−1 thiamine (Sigma) and 0.1 ml of 1 mg ml−1 biotin (Sigma)] [12]. The media pH and salinity as well as the incubation temperature were equivalent to that of the natural environment from which the samples were collected. All plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The novel strain SIJ1T was purified and maintained at 37 °C on 6 % (w/v) NaCl MA. Stocks of the purified culture were preserved as suspensions at Microbank (Pro-Lab diagnostics, Wirral, UK) and stored at −80 °C.
Several morphologically distinct single colonies were individually recultured into new media and purified. Strain SIJ1T developed small colonies that were 1–2 mm in diameter, entire and convex in shape, and opaque and cream in colour (Fig. S1, available in the online version of this article).
Phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characterization
Cell morphology was determined by phase contrast microscopy (Zeiss Axio), variable-pressure field-emission scanning electron microscopy (Leo supra 50V, Zeiss) and transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1200EX II, jeol) (Fig. S2). Cells of strain SIJ1T were non-flagellated, sporulating rod shape. The cell length (μm; average (minimum–maximum) SD] was 3.6 (2–6) 1.3 and the cell width was 1.2 (0.9–2) 0.3 (Figs. S2a, b). The spores were ellipsoidal in parasporal position within a non-swollen sporangium (Fig. S2c). For comparison, some of the investigations were performed with Aureibacillus halotolerans S1203T and Bacillus acidicola 105-2T (from the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zelkulturen) as reference strains (Tables 1 and 2). The motility test was executed using the hanging-drop technique. Strain SIJ1T and B. acidicola 105-2T were non-motile and had no flagella when cells were stained using the flagella staining method [13, 14], while A. halotolerans S1203T was motile with a peritrichous flagella type.
Table 1.
Key characteristics of strain SIJ1T in comparison with the reference strains
Strains: 1, SIJ1T; 2, Aureibacillus halotolerans S1203T; 3, Bacillus acidicola 105-2T; 4, Bhargavaea cecembensis DSE10T; 5, Bacillus marinisedimentorum KCTC 33721T; 6, Virgibacillus sediminis YIM kkny3T. +, Positive; w, weak positive; −, negative; nd, not determined.
Characteristic |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source |
Current study |
Current study and [38] |
Current study and [24] |
[65] |
[55] |
[66] |
Colony colour |
Cream |
Creamy white and shiny |
White and little bit creamy |
Brown |
nd |
Creamy white to pale yellow |
Sporulation |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
Cell shape |
Rods |
Rods |
Rods |
Rods |
Rods |
Rods |
Gram stain |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Motility |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
Flagella |
No |
Peritrichous |
No |
No |
Peritrichous |
Peritrichous |
Anaerobic |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
Growth in/at: |
||||||
4 °C |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
42 °C |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
0 % NaCl |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
15 % NaCl |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
pH 6 |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
pH 10 |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
Nitrate reduction |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Oxidase |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
Catalase |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
Urease |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
Gelatinase |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
Amylase |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
nd |
− |
Caseinase |
− |
− |
− |
nd |
nd |
− |
Hydrolysis of: |
||||||
Aesculin |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
Tween 80 |
− |
w |
− |
− |
− |
− |
Indole production |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
Citrate utilization |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
Acid production from: |
||||||
d-Glucose |
w |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
d-Mannose |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
d-Fructose |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
Maltose |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
NR |
Major isoprenoid quinones |
MK-7 |
MK-7 |
MK-7, MK-6, MK-5, MK-4, MK-3 |
MK-8, MK-6 |
MK-7 |
MK-7 |
Major lipids‡ |
PG, DPG, GL, PL, PGL,L |
PG, DPG, GL |
PG, DPG, GL, PE |
PG, DPG |
DPG, PG, PE |
DPG, PG, PE, PL |
DNA G+C content (mol%) |
43.1* |
47.7† |
43.2† |
59.5† |
46.3* |
40.9† |
*G+C content determined from whole genome sequence.
†G+C content determined by reverse-phase HPLC [67].
‡DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; GL, glycolipid; PL, phospholipid; PGL, phosphoglycolipid; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; L, lipid.
Table 2.
Comparison of the fatty acids of strain SIJ1T and the reference strains
Strains: 1, SIJ1T; 2, Aureibacillus halotolerans S1203T; 3, Bacillus acidicola 105-2T. Only fatty acids with results higher than 0.5 % in at least one of the tested strains are listed
Cellular fatty acids |
1 |
2 |
3 |
---|---|---|---|
Straight-chain: |
|||
C14 : 0 |
0.7 |
2.3 |
1.3 |
C16 : 0 |
2.8 |
7.5 |
4.4 |
C17 : 0 |
– |
1.4 |
– |
Branched-chain: |
|||
iso-C14 : 0 |
7.1 |
4.7 |
3.3 |
iso-C15 : 0 |
11.0 |
13.3 |
43.1 |
anteiso-C15 : 0 |
47.4 |
66.3 |
18.7 |
iso-C16 : 0 |
19.4 |
1.9 |
8.5 |
anteiso-C17 : 1 A |
0.7 |
– |
– |
iso-C17 : 0 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
7.9 |
anteiso-C17 : 0 |
3.2 |
1.0 |
12.4 |
Unsaturated: |
|||
C16 : 1 ω11c |
– |
0.6 |
– |
Summed feature 2* |
2.0 |
– |
– |
Summed feature 3* |
4.5 |
– |
– |
*Summed feature 2: iso-C16 : 0 I, C14 : 0-3OH; summed feature 3: C16 : 1 ω6c, C16 : 1ω7c.
Growth of strain SIJ1T was tested under different NaCl concentrations in the range of 0–15 % (w/v), in increments of 1 %. Growth of the strain was also tested at temperatures ranging from 5–55°C and pH values ranging from pH 4 to 11. The isolate grew successfully with NaCl concentrations from 0 to 15 %, pH between pH 6 and 10 and temperature between 25 and 42 °C (failed to grow above 42 °C), with optimal growth with 6 % (w/v) NaCl, at 30 °C and at pH 7–8. In comparison to SIJ1T, the reference strain A. halotolearns S1203T was unable to grow at pH 6 and the minimum pH it grew at was pH 7. A. halotolearns S1203T was able to grow at 4 °C. On the other hand, the reference strain B. acidicola 105-2T was able to grow at temperatures from 15 to 45 °C, pH from pH 4 to 7 and NaCl concentration from 0 to 3 % only.
The detailed physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain SIJ1T are given in Tables 1 and 2, as well as the genus and species descriptions. A series of physiological and biochemical characteristics could distinguish strain SIJ1T from the reference strains A. halotolerans S1203T and B. acidicola 105-2T as well as other related genera. The phenotypic characterization was carried out using GEN III MicroPlates (Biolog) and API 20NE, API ZYM and API 50CH strips (bioMérieux) following the manufacturers’ methods. The ability of strain SIJ1T to grow on crude oil in addition to various carbon sources equivalent to those tested by the Biolog system was confirmed by growing the strain on basal marine agar (BMA) prepared as described in González et al. [15] and supplemented with 0.1 % w/v or v/v of the tested carbon source and NH4Cl as a nitrogen source. The inoculated plates were incubated at 30 °C for 1 week. Furthermore, strain SIJ1T was inoculated on MA and incubated at 30 °C inside a Mitsubishi Gas Chemical anaerobic system for 2 weeks to determine the strain anaerobic growth ability. In addition, catalase and oxidase activities were determined according to Smibert and Krieg [16]. In the API 20NE strip, there were positive results for aesculin hydrolysis, maltose assimilation and β-galactosidase. The API 50 CHE strip showed fermentation and production of acid from the following carbohydrates ribose, d-xylose, methyl α-d-glucoside, amygdalin, arbutin, aesculin, salicin, cellobiose, maltose, xylitol and gentiobiose in addition to weak positive reactions for glucose, methyl α-d-mannoside, N-acetyl-glucose, lactose and trehalose. The API ZYM result showed a weak positive result for β-galactosidase. In the Biolog GEN III MicroPlate system, there were positive results for maltose, trehalose, cellobiose, gentiobiose, melibiose, d-salicin, inosine, 1 % sodium lactate, glycerol, nalidixic acid, lithium chloride, sodium butyrate, myo-inositol and d-glucuronic acid; and weak positive results for glucose, raffinose, turanose, d-serine, stachyose, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine, dextrin, acetic acid, acetoacetic acid, troleandomycin, aztreonam, guanidine HCl, tetrazolium violet, tetrazolium blue and potassium tellurite. The BMA results confirmed the Biolog GEN III results and showed the inability of strain SIJ1T to grow on BMA supplied with crude oil as a sole carbon source.
The ability of strain SIJ1T to precipitate calcium carbonate was tested by growing it on B4 at pH 7.6 [17]. The plates were incubated for 1 month at 30 °C and were examined for calcium carbonate precipitation under stereomicroscope supplied with camera. The calcium carbonate crystals were harvested following the method described by Mahmoud [18] and examined directly under the Leo Supra 50V variable-pressure field-emission scanning microscope (Zeiss). The isolate was able to precipitate CaCO3 crystals of various shapes and sizes (Fig. S3) and could be exploited in various biotechnological applications including the removal of heavy metals, biodegradation of pollutants, sequestering atmospheric CO2 and remediation of buildings [19].
The resistance of strain SIJ1T to antibiotics was tested by the Identification Service of the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zelkulturen (DSMZ) in Germany and following their protocol [20]. SIJ1T cells were found to be resistant to the following antibiotics (μg disk−1): erythromycin (15), oflaxin (5), norfloxacin (10), colistin (10), pipemidic acid (20), fosfomycin (50), moxifloxacin (5), polymyxin B (300 IU disk−1) and nystatin (100 IU disk−1).
The cellular fatty acid composition was determined using Sherlock Microbial Identification System (midi) as described by Sasser [21]. The cellular fatty acids were analysed in culture at the late exponential stage of growth after growing the isolate on MA incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. The fatty acid profiles of strain SIJ1T and two reference strains A. halotolerans S1203T and B. acidicola 105-2T are presented in Table 2. The major fatty acids (>10 %) of strain SIJ1T were anteiso-C15 : 0 (47.4 %), iso-C16 : 0 (19.4 %) and iso-C15 : 0 (11.0 %). The major fatty acids of A. halotolerans S1203T were anteiso-C15 : 0 (66.3 %) and iso-C15 : 0 (13.3 %), while B. acidicola 105-2T was dominated by iso-C15 : 0 (43.1 %), anteiso-C15 : 0 (18.7 %) and anteiso-C17 : 0 (12.4 %).
The extraction and the analysis of polar lipids and respiratory quinones of strain SIJ1T were carried out by the Identification Service of the DSMZ in Germany by Dr. Susanne Verbarg following Tindall's [22, 23] methods. Strain SIJ1T possessed diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, an unidentified glycolipid, an unidentified phospholipid, phosphoglycolipid and an unidentified lipid as polar lipids (Fig. S4). The last three types of lipid were only detected in SIJ1T and not in the reference strains (Table 1).
Strain SIJ1T contained an unsaturated menaquinone with seven isoprene units (MK-7) as the predominant respiratory quinone. Comparing the data obtained for SIJ1T with B. acidicola 105-2T published elsewhere [24] showed differences in their major isoprenoid quinones where the reference strain contains MK-3, MK-4, MK-5, Mk-6 and MK-7.
The peptidoglycan of the SIJ1T cell wall was analysed according to Schumann [25] and it showed that the cell-wall peptidoglycan was based on meso-diaminopimelic acid. The strain SIJ1T whole-cell sugars were also analysed using Schumann's protocol [25]. The results showed that strain SIJ1T contains ribose and, in smaller amounts, xylose, mannose and glucose.
16S RNA gene phylogeny
The complete 16S rRNA gene sequence of SIJ1T was determined by direct sequencing of its PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene. Genomic DNA extraction was carried out using the MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicenter Biotechnologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR-mediated amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and purification of the PCR product was carried out as describe in Rainey et al. [26]. Purified PCR products were sequenced using the CEQ DTCS-Quick Start Kit (Beckman Coulter) as directed in the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequence reactions were electrophoresed using the CEQ 8000 Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter.
The length of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain SIJ1T was a continuous stretch of 1540 bp. Comparing the 16S rRNA gene of the SIJ1T with corresponding sequences in the GenBank, EMBL and RDP II databases indicated that strain SIJ1T is a member of the phylum Firmicutes, class Bacilli, order Bacillales, family Bacillaceae. A comparative sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes demonstrated 95.8 % similarity between strain SIJ1T and A. halotolerans S1203T and 94.3 % similarity between SIJ1T and B. acidicola 105-2T. A phylogenetic tree was reconstructed by multiple sequence alignment of the strain SIJ1T sequence with its closest relatives in the GenBank. Pairwise sequence similarities were calculated using the method recommended by Meier-Kolthoff et al. [27] for the 16S rRNA gene available via the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) web server [28] available at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/. Phylogenies were inferred by the GGDC web server available at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/ using the DSMZ phylogenomics pipeline [29] adapted to single genes. A multiple sequence alignment was created with muscle [30]. Maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony (MP) trees were inferred from the alignment with RAxML [31] and TNT [32], respectively. For ML analysis, rapid bootstrapping in conjunction with the autoMRE bootstopping criterion [33] and subsequent search for the best tree was used; for MP, 1000 bootstrapping replicates were used in conjunction with tree-bisection-and-reconnection branch swapping and ten random sequence addition replicates. The sequences were checked for a compositional bias using the Χ² test as implemented in PAUP* [34]. The input nucleotide matrix comprised 24 operational taxonomic units and 1579 characters, 315 of which were variable and 239 of which were parsimony-informative. The base-frequency check indicated no compositional bias (P=1.00, α=0.05). ML analysis under the GTR+GAMMA model yielded a highest log likelihood of −6372.3, whereas the estimated alpha parameter was 0.1. The ML bootstrapping converged after 1000 replicates; the average support was 74.1 %. MP analysis yielded a best score of 869 (consistency index 0.5, retention index 0.6) and 16 best trees. The MP bootstrapping average support was 78.8 % (Fig. 1). Furthermore, all sequences were edited manually using BioEdit [35] then aligned with their nearest neighbour from the GenBank using ClustalX [36]. Neighbour-joining (NJ) method including bootstrap (2000×) analysis [37] was used via PAUP version 4 software [34] to construct the phylogenetic tree (Fig. S5).
Fig. 1.
Maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony (MP) phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences for strain Litoribacterium kuwaitense SIJ1T (MT003183) and related genera. ML/MP tree inferred under the GTR+GAMMA model and rooted by midpoint-rooting. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. The numbers above the branches are support values when larger than 60 % from ML (left) and MP (right) bootstrapping.
The phylogeny analysis showed that strain SIJ1T forms a distinct phylogenetic lineage with respect to the closely related genera Bacillus , Bhargavaea , Planocomicrobium and Virgibacillus (Figs 1 and S5). Strain SIJ1T shared common ancestor with A. halotolerans S1203T.
Genome features and comparative genomics
The whole genome of SIJ1T was determined. The genome was extracted using the PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagents (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the sample quality check was performed using Qubit DNA BR assay kit. The nebnext Fast DNA Library Prep Set for Ion Torrent (Biolabs Inc.) and the kapa Library Quantification Kit were used. The whole-genome was sequenced with Ion Torrent using Ion PI Hi-Q sequencing 200 kit and Ion PI chip kit version 3 (ThermoFisher Scientific) at SEQme (Dobříš, Czech Republic). The G+C content of the strain SIJ1T DNA based on the whole genome sequencing was 43.1 mol%, close to A. acidicola 105-2T (42 mol%) [24] but lower than that of A. halotolerans S1203T (47.7 %) [38].
In total, 4.3 million single reads were produced with an average length of 177 bases. The SPAdes genome assembler version 3.1.0 was used to perform a de novo genome assembly, which yielded 949 contigs where 108 contigs had length larger than 500 bp, N50 values equal to 78 202 bp and the longest contig measured 348 688 bp. The whole genome analysis of strain SIJ1T showed that the bacterium has a genome size of 3 989 945 bp and contains 4085 predicted protein-encoding genes and 149 predicted RNAs. The authenticity and contamination of the whole genome sequence of strain SIJ1T were checked as indicated by Chun et al. [39] and executed using EzBioCloud Contamination Estimator by 16S (ContEst16S) [40], where the SIJ1T genome was confirmed to be free of contamination. The quality of the strain SIJ1T genome was analysed using CheckM version 1.1.18 [41], which showed 97.3 % completeness and only 0.2 % contamination in the genome (Fig. S6). Genome features were visualized using the CGView server [42]
The amino acid identity (AAI) of strain SIJ1T and its relation to various Uniport species was investigated using an AAI profiler [43]. The results showed that the closest match to SIJ1T is A. halotolerans S1203T (Fig. S7a), with a 69.8 % AAI value. However, when the comparison was made between SIJ1T and A. halotolerans S1203T on a one-to0one basis using the Kostas lab AAI calculator [44], the results showed that the two genomes share 63.7 % AAI only (Fig. S7b). The Kostas lab average nucleotide identity (ANI) calculator made it easy to compare the genome of SIJ1T with that of A. halotolerans S1203T, and the similarity between them was 75.3 %. Both AAI and ANI readings are below the threshold of 70 and 80 %, respectively, for genus delineation described by Rodriguez-R and Konstantinids [44].
The relatedness of strain SIJ1T on the whole genome level to its nearest match from the GenBank was investigated. The genome sequence data were uploaded to the Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS), a free bioinformatics platform available under https://tygs.dsmz.de, for a whole genome-based taxonomic analysis [45]. Determination of closest type strain genomes was done in two complementary ways. First, all user genomes were compared against all type strain genomes available in the TYGS database via the MASH algorithm, a fast approximation of intergenomic relatedness [46], and the ten type strains with the smallest MASH distances chosen per user genome. Second, an additional set of ten closely related type strains was determined via 16S rRNA gene sequences. These were extracted from the user genomes using RNAmmer [47], and each sequence was subsequently blasted [48] against the 16S rRNA gene sequence of each of the currently 13 787 type strains available in the TYGS database. This was used as a proxy to find the 50 best-matching type strains (according to the bitscore) for each user genome and to subsequently calculate precise distances using the genome blast distance phylogeny (GBDP) approach under the algorithm 'coverage' and distance formula d5 [28]. These distances were used to determine the 10 closest type strain genomes for each user genomes. For phylogenomic inference, all pairwise comparisons among the set of genomes were conducted using GBDP and accurate intergenomic distances inferred under the algorithm ‘trimming’ and distance formula d5 [28]. 100 distance replicates were calculated each. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization values and confidence intervals were calculated using the recommended settings of the GGDC 2.1 [28]. The resulting intergenomic distances were used to infer a balanced minimum-evolution tree with branch support via fastme 2.1.4, including SPR postprocessing [49]. Branch support was inferred from 100 pseudobootstrap replicates each. The trees were rooted at the midpoint [50] and visualized with PhyD3 [51]. The result of the phylogenomic tree clustered strain SIJ1T with the Bacillus marinisedimentorum KCTC 33721T and far away from A. halotolerans S1203T (Fig. 2) despite the 16S rRNA tree produced by the TYGS database clustering strain SIJ1T with A. halotolerans S1203T (Fig. 1). It is worth mentioning that the AAI value between strain SIJ1T and B. marinisedimentorum KCTC 33721T is only 54.5 %. The AAI and ANI results and the phylogenomic and phylogenetic analysis for the genome all proved that strain SIJ1T does indeed a novel genus.
Fig. 2.
Tree inferred with FastME 2.1.6.1 from GBDP distances calculated from whole genome sequences of strain Litoribacterium kuwaitense SIJ1T (PRJNA606937) and 20 related genomes. Sequence length was 1540 bp. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d5. The numbers above branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values >60 % from 100 replications, with an average branch support of 35.2 %. The tree was rooted at the midpoint. The bar is equal to 0.02 of the phylogenetic distance. The corresponding genome project numbers are included between brackets. 1, Species cluster; 2, subspecies cluster; 3, G+C content; 4, delta statistics; 5, genome size; 6, protein count.
The functional annotation for the SIJ1T genome was achieved by the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server [52–54]. Among the coding sequences, the dominant sequences belong to conserved processes such as those of metabolic, cellular and regulatory processes (Fig. S8). The majority of the annotated genes belong to carbohydrates>amino acids and derivatives>proteins metabolism subsystems. The majority of the carbohydrate sequences belong to the central carbohydrate metabolism and was dominated by the glycolysis and the gluconeogenesis coding sequences. The second major group of sequences in the subsystems, i.e. amino acids and derivatives, was dominated by lysine, threonine, methionine, cysteine biosynthesis and degradation genes. Protein biosynthesis genes dominated the third major group, i.e. proteins metabolism subsystem.
The strain SIJ1T genome contained stress responses coding genes within six subcategories, i.e. heat shock, cold shock, detoxification, osmotic stress, oxidative stress and unknown subcategories. Upon comparison to A. halotolerans S1203T and B. marinisedimentorum KCTC 33721T genomes using RAST annotation, the SIJ1T genome was the only one that contained cold shock and heat shock coding genes, and in total, it included 114 coding genes within the six subcategories of the stress-resistant subsystem while A. halotolerans S1203T contained 49 and B. marinisedimentorum KCTC 33721T contained 57 genes. A. halotolerans S1203T was isolated from marine sediment at a water depth of almost 865 m in the Okinawa Trough [38] while B. marinisedimentorum was isolated from a coastal sediment sample from Weihai, PR China [55]. On the other hand, strain SIJ1T was isolated from an Arabian Gulf’s tidal flat, an environment known for its extreme high fluctuations in temperature and high salinity level due to a low precipitation (low rainwater fall) and high evaporation rates [10]. Harbouring higher diversity of stress-encoding genes may present a potential survival mechanism for microflora in such harsh conditions.
Although both SIJ1T and A. halotolerans S1203T can grow with NaCl ranging from 0 to 15 %, the SIJ1T genome includes more genes related to osmotic stress, especially choline and betaine uptake and betaine biosynthesis as well as ectoine biosynthesis and regulation genes (Fig. S9). Both betaine and ectoine are organic solutes that can be accumulated intracellularly when osmolarity rises and is released extracellularly when it decreases helping the bacteria survive [56]. SIJ1T genome analysis revealed the presence of genes encoding enzymes of the ectoine biosynthesis pathway, i.e. l-2,4-diaminobutyric acid acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.-), diaminobutyratepyruvate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.46) and l-ectoine synthase (EC 4.2.1.-) [57]. Ectoine is of special importance in industry where it is used as a protecting agent for macromolecules, cells and tissues, and as a therapeutic agent for specific diseases [58]. Furthermore, strain SIJ1T showed a higher number of choline sulfatase coding genes, i.e. 18, compared to A. halotolerans S1203T and B. marinisedimentorum KCTC 33721T that included only one coding gene each. Choline sulfatase encoded by the betC gene is the key enzyme for degrading choline-O-sulphate to choline, converted to glycine betaine, and catabolized further into ammonia and pyruvate [59]. Glycine betaine is an osmoprotectant found in many bacteria [60] and used as carbon, nitrogen, and energy sources like in the Gram-negative bacterium Synrhizobium meliloti [59]. Research done on Bacillus subtilis proved that glycine betaine can protect against cold and heat stress [7].
The annotated genome of strain SIJ1T also suggested that it can uptake the environment’s glycine betaine by specific transporter systems. The genome includes the operon that encodes a high-affinity ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport system consisting of three proteins: (1) ProV, peripheral membrane protein found on the cytoplasmic side; (2) ProW, the integral membrane component of the transport system; and (3) the ProX periplasmic glycine betaine-binding protein (GBBP) [61–63]. Also, the genome includes OpuA, and OpuD ABC uptake systems. The OpuA system is the predominant transporter for glycine betaine. It consists of three components: an ATPase (OpuAA), an integral membrane protein (OpuAB) and a hydrophilic polypeptide (OpuAC), which functions as the GBBP, and all are found in SIJ1T annotated genome. OpuD is essential for glycine betaine uptake and osmoprotection [61–63].
One interesting finding in the annotated SIJ1T genome using RAST is the presence of motility and chemotaxis genes. The majority are related to flagellar motility, but morphological and microscopic examinations showed with with no doubt the absence of flagella in the examined strain. The functional annotations of the genome conducted using the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server [64], where ghostx homology software and KEGG orthology bi-directional best hit assignment method were used, showed that the flagellar assembly and bacterial chemotaxis gene clusters within the SIJ1T genome are almost complete (Fig. S10).
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic characteristics and the whole genome sequencing, strain SIJ1T should be considered as representing new genus and new species for which we propose the name Litoribacterium kuwaitense gen. nov., sp. nov.
Description of Litoribacterium gen. nov.
Litoribacterium (Li.to.ri.bac.te’ri.um. L. neut. n. litus shore; N.L. neut. n. bacterium a small rod; N.L. neut. n. Litoribacterium small rod isolated from shore).
Cells are Gram-stain-positive, non-motile, spore-forming and strictly aerobic rods. Oxidase- and catalase-positive. Unable to hydrolyse starch and Tweens 20, 40, 60 and 80. Unable to hydrolyse casein and gelatin. The predominant ubiquinone is MK-7 and the cell-wall peptidoglycan is based on meso-diaminopimelic acid. The major fatty acids are anteiso-C15:, iso-C16 : 0 and iso-C15 : 0 and the major whole-cell sugar is ribose. The major polar lipids are diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, unidentified phospholipid, unidentified glycolipid, phosphoglycolipid and unidentified lipid. Phylogenetically, the genus Litoribacterium belongs to the family Bacillaceae in the class Bacilli. The type species is Litoribacterium kuwaitense .
Description of Litoribacterium kuwaitense sp. nov.
Litoribacterium kuwaitense (ku.wait.en'se, N.L. neut. adj. kuwaitense pertaining to the State of Kuwait, from where the type strain was isolated).
Litoribacterium kuwaitense exhibits the following properties to those given in the genus description. Cells are 2–6 µm long and 0.9–2 µm wide. Colonies on modified MA are small colonies that are 1–2 mm in diameter and are entire and convex in shape as well as being opaque and cream in colour. Growth occurs at 25–42 °C with optimum growth at 30 °C. Growth is observed at pH 6–10 with optimal growth at pH 7–8. Furthermore, the NaCl range for growth is 0–15 % (optimum 6 %).
Strain SIJ1T is able to ferment and produce acid from the following carbohydrates ribose, d-xylose, methyl α-d-glucoside, amygdalin, arbutin, aesculin, salicin, cellobiose, maltose, xylitol and gentiobiose in addition to weak positive reactions for glucose, α-MeDmannoside, N-acetyl-glucose, lactose and trehalose. The strain showed the ability to assimilate maltose, trehalose, cellobiose, gentiobiose, melibiose, d-salicin, inosine, 1 % sodium lactate, glycerol, nalidixic acid, lithium chloride, sodium butyrate, myo-inositol and d-glucuronic acid; and to weakly assimilate glucose, raffinose, turanose, d-serine, stachyose, N-acetyl-d-glactoseamine, dextrin, acetic acid, acetoacetic acid, troleandomycin, aztreonam, guanidine HCl, tetrazolium violet, tetrazolium blue and potassium tellurite.
The type strain, SIJ1T (=DSM 28862T=LMG 28316T), was isolated from Sabiya mud flat sediment collected north of Kuwait Bay. The DNA G+C content of the strain is 43.1 mol% and the draft genome showed that the bacterium has a genome size of 3 989 945 bp and contains 4085 predicted protein-encoding genes.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
This project was supported by the Research Administration (Kuwait University) grant number SY03/10.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to the Biotechnology Center, Faculty of Science, Kuwait University the general facility project number GS01/02 for providing the sequencing facility (ABI 3031xl Genetic analyzer) with special thanks to Ms. Sheela Thankakkon. Special thanks also goes to Ms. Nisha Phillip from the Nanoscopy Center, Faculty of Science, Kuwait University for her help in the SEM work.
Author contributions
Writing: original draft, review and editing: H. M. Investigation: H. M., L. J., S. E. and F. A. Strain isolation: A. A. Formal Analysis and resources: H. M.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: AAI, amino acid identity; ANI, average nucleotide identity; BSA, basal marine agar; MA, marine agar; ML, maximum-likelihood; MP, maximum-parsimony; NJ, neighbour-joining; TYGS, Type (Strain) Genome Server.
Ten supplementary figures are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Decho AW. Microbial biofilms in intertidal systems: an overview. Cont Shelf Res. 2000;20:1257–1273. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Le Hir P, Roberts W, Cazaillet O, Christie M, Bassoullet P. Characterization of intertidal flat hydrodynamics. Cont Shelf Res. 2000;20:1433–1459. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim B-S, Oh H-M, Kang H, Chun J. Archaeal diversity in tidal flat sediment as revealed by 16S rDNA analysis. J Microbiol. 2005;43:144–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Böttcher ME, Hespenheide B, Llobet-Brossa E, Beardsley C, Larsen O. The biogeochemistry, stable isotope geochemistry, and microbial community structure of a temperate intertidal mudflat: an integrated study. Cont Shelf Res. 2000;20:1749-1769.3 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stevens H, Brinkhoff T, Rink B, Vollmers J, Simon M. Diversity and abundance of gram positive bacteria in a tidal flat ecosystem. Environ Mcrobiol. 2007;9:1810–1822. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mandic-Mulec I, Stefanic P, van Elsas JD. Ecology of Bacillaceae. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3:TBS-0017-2013. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0017-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hoffmann T, Bremer E. Protection of Bacillus subtilis against cold stress via compatible-solute acquisition. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:1552–1562. doi: 10.1128/JB.01319-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jebbar M, von Blohn C, Bremer E. Ectoine functions as an osmoprotectant in Bacillus subtilis and is accumulated via the ABC-transport system OpuC. FEMS Microbiol lett. 1997;154:325–330. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crowley E. Compatible solute ectoine review: protection mechanisms and production methods. JUST. 2017;5:32–39. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Riegl BM, Purkis SJ. Coral reefs of the Gulf: adaptation to climatic extremes in the world’s hottest sea. In: Riegl BM, Purkis SJ, editors. Coral reefs of the Gulf. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012. pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Al-Qattan AS. Archaeal Abundance and Diversity in Intertidal Flats of Kuwait. Master Thesis. Kuwait: Kuwait University; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Atlas MR. Handbook of Microbiology Media. 3rd ed. USA: CRC press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leifson E. Staining, shape and arrangement of bacterial flagella. J Bacteriol. 1951;62:377–389. doi: 10.1128/JB.62.4.377-389.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Beveridge T, Lawrence J, Murray R, et al. Sampling and staining for light microscopy. In: Reddy C, Beveridge T, Breznak J, Marzluf G, Schmidt T, editors. Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007. p. 29. p. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gonzalez JM, Mayer F, Moran MA, Hodson RE, Whitman WB. Sagittula stellata gen. Nov., a lignin-transforming bacterium from a coastal environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1997;47:773–780. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-3-773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In: Gephardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Kreig NR, editors. Methods for General Molecular Bacteriology. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marvasi M, Visscher PT, Perito B, Mastromei G, Casillas-Martínez L. Physiological requirements for carbonate precipitation during biofilm development of Bacillus subtilis etfA mutant. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;71:341–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mahmoud H. Variations in the abundance and structural diversity of microbes forming biofilms in a thermally stressed coral reef system. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;100:710–718. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dhami NK, Reddy MS, Mukherjee A. Biomineralization of calcium carbonates and their engineered applications: a review. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:314. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Industrienorm DD. Methoden Zur Empfindlichkeitsprüfung von bakteriellen Krankheitserregern (außer Mykobakterien) gegen Chemotherapeutika. Bestimmung Der minimalen Hemmkonzentration nACh Der Agar-Verdünnungsmethode. DIN. 1991;58940 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE, USA: Microbial ID, Inc.; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tindall BJ. A comparative study of the lipid composition of Halobacterium saccharovorum from various sources. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1990a;13:128–130. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi . FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990b;66:199–202. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Albert RA, Archambault J, Rosselló-Mora R, Tindall BJ, Matheny M. Bacillus acidicola sp. nov., a novel mesophilic, acidophilic species isolated from acidic Sphagnum peat bogs in Wisconsin. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:2125–2130. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02337-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schumann P. Peptidoglycan structure. In: Rainey F, Oren A, editors. Methods in Microbiology. Vol. 38. Academic Press; 2011. pp. 101–129. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL, Janssen PH, Hippe H, Stackebrandt E. Clostridium paradoxum DSM 7308T contains multiple 16S rRNA genes with heterogeneous intervening sequences. Microbiology. 1996;142 (Pt 8:2087–2095. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-8-2087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk H-P. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy? Arch Microbiol. 2013;195:413–418. doi: 10.1007/s00203-013-0888-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V, et al. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. SIGS. 2014;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-9-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Edgar RC. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Goloboff PA, Farris JS, TNT NKC. A free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 2008;24:774–786. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol. 2010;17:337–354. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4.0 b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hall A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acid Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu Y, Liang J, Zhang Z, Yu M, Wang M, et al. Aureibacillus halotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:3950–3958. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H, SM H, et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:2053–2057. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Grant JR, Stothard P. The CGView server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W181–184. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Medlar AJ, Törönen P, Holm L. AAI-profiler: fast proteome-wide exploratory analysis reveals taxonomic identity, misclassification and contamination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W479–485. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe. 2014;9:111–118. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 2016;17:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:2798–2800. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat. 1972;106:645–667. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kreft L, Botzki A, Coppens F, Vandepoele K, Van Bel M. PhyD3: a phylogenetic tree viewer with extended phyloXML support for functional genomics data visualization. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2946–2947. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, et al. The seed and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST) Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Guo L-Y, Ling S-K, Li C-M, Chen G-J, Du Z-J. Bacillus marinisedimentorum sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:198–203. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Burg MB, Ferraris JD. Intracellular organic osmolytes: function and regulation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:7309–7313. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R700042200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Peters P, Galinski EA, Trüper HG. The biosynthesis of ectoine. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990;71:157–162. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pastor JM, Salvador M, Argandoña M, Bernal V, Reina-Bueno M, et al. Ectoines in cell stress protection: uses and biotechnological production. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28:782–801. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Osterås M, Boncompagni E, Vincent N, Poggi MC, Le Rudulier D. Presence of a gene encoding choline sulfatase in Sinorhizobium meliloti bet operon: choline-O-sulfate is metabolized into glycine betaine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:11394–11399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kappes RM, Kempf B, Kneip S, Boch J, Gade J, et al. Two evolutionarily closely related ABC transporters mediate the uptake of choline for synthesis of the osmoprotectant glycine betaine in Bacillus subtilis . Mol Microbiol. 1999;32:203–216. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mandon K, Osterås M, Boncompagni E, Trinchant JC, Spennato G, et al. The Sinorhizobium meliloti glycine betaine biosynthetic genes (betlCBA) are induced by choline and highly expressed in bacteroids. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003;16:709–719. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.8.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Boncompagni E, Dupont L, Mignot T, Osteräs M, Lambert A, et al. Characterization of a Snorhizobium meliloti ATP-binding cassette histidine transporter also involved in betaine and proline uptake. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:3717–3725. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.13.3717-3725.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wargo MJ, Szwergold BS, Hogan DA. Identification of two gene clusters and a transcriptional regulator required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa glycine betaine catabolism. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:2690–2699. doi: 10.1128/JB.01393-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Kanehisa M. KAAS: KEGG automatic annotation server. Genome Inform. 2005;5:2005. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Manorama R, Pindi PK, Reddy GSN, Shivaji S. Bhargavaea cecembensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the Chagos-Laccadive ridge system in the Indian Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:2618–2623. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.002691-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen Y-G, Cui X-L, Wang Y-X, Zhang Y-Q, Tang S-K, et al. Virgibacillus sediminis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a salt lake in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:2058–2063. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.003624-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the g+ C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1989;39:159–167. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.