Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2021 Jun 15;13(25):29949–29959. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c06637

Strong Foam-like Composites from Highly Mesoporous Wood and Metal-Organic Frameworks for Efficient CO2 Capture

Shennan Wang †, Cheng Wang ‡, Qi Zhou †,§,*
PMCID: PMC8289243  PMID: 34130452

Abstract

graphic file with name am1c06637_0010.jpg

Mechanical stability and multicycle durability are essential for emerging solid sorbents to maintain an efficient CO2 adsorption capacity and reduce cost. In this work, a strong foam-like composite is developed as a CO2 sorbent by the in situ growth of thermally stable and microporous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in a mesoporous cellulose template derived from balsa wood, which is delignified by using sodium chlorite and further functionalized by 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-mediated oxidation. The surface carboxyl groups in the TEMPO-oxidized wood template (TO-wood) facilitate the coordination of the cellulose network with multivalent metal ions and thus enable the nucleation and in situ growth of MOFs including copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate [Cu3(BTC)2], zinc 2-methylimidazolate, and aluminum benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate. The TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite shows a high specific surface area of 471 m2 g–1 and a high CO2 adsorption capacity of 1.46 mmol g–1 at 25 °C and atmospheric pressure. It also demonstrates high durability during the temperature swing cyclic CO2 adsorption/desorption test. In addition, the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite is lightweight but exceptionally strong with a specific elastic modulus of 3034 kN m kg–1 and a specific yield strength of 68 kN m kg–1 under the compression test. The strong and durable TO-wood/MOF composites can potentially be used as a solid sorbent for CO2 capture, and their application can possibly be extended to environmental remediation, gas separation and purification, insulation, and catalysis.

Keywords: MOFs, mesoporous wood template, composites, CO2 capture, mechanical properties

1. Introduction

CO2 capture technologies are of great importance to mitigate the greenhouse gas emission and reduce its environmental impact.1 Enormous efforts have been previously made to develop solid CO2 sorbents with high energy efficiency and multicycle durability by using porous materials including zeolite,2 silica,3 and activated carbon,4,5 or amine-based sorbents with CO2-reactive polyethyleneimine (PEI),6 3-(triethoxysilyl)propylamine (APTES),7 and ethylenediamine.8,9 Recently, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted much attention for applications in CO2 capture,10−12 catalysis,13−15 and sensing,16 owing to their favorable large surface area and tunable micro-/mesopore structure. Mechanical integrity and strength are essential for the practical application of solid sorbents to avoid pulverization and thus overcome high pressure drop and poor mass transfer.17 To this end, monolithic MOF-based CO2 sorbents have been prepared through strategies such as stepwise gelation of MOFs,18 3D printing,19 and in situ growth of MOFs in preformed inorganic network including porous carbon,20 macro-/mesoporous silica,21 and graphene hydrogel.22 For instance, graphene/zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) hybrid aerogel showed an elastic modulus of 280 kPa and a maximum strength of 16 kPa under compressive deformation.22 Utilizing clay and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) as the binder and plasticizer enabled the 3D printing of a cobalt-based MOF (UTSA-16) into a channeled monolithic structure, which showed an elastic modulus of 25 MPa and a compressive strength of 0.55 MPa at a density of 1659 kg m–3.19

In addition, deposition, encapsulation, or in situ synthesis of MOF particles such as zirconium terephthalate-based MOF (UiO-66), copper-based MOF (MOF-199), and ZIF-8 in natural wood was developed. The corresponding wood/MOF composites were demonstrated to have high removal efficiency for organic pollutants,23 superior selectivity toward CO2 adsorption against N2,24 and good antibacterial activities.25 Furthermore, carbonization of wood-/cobalt-based MOF composites produced a high-power 3D monolithic reactor for improved mass transfer and CO conversion during Fischer–Tropsch synthesis.26 These composites have combined the functionalities of MOFs and mechanical robustness of wood. Particularly, beech wood with in situ synthesized ZIF-8 showed a high compressive strength of 100 MPa, which outperformed polymer-based MOF composites.24 However, insufficient coordination sites in cell lumen surfaces of natural wood resulted in the low loading of MOFs around 2 wt %, limiting wood/MOF composites to be used for the large capacity adsorption of CO2.23,24 The binding and adhesion of MOFs to the cellulosic substrate can be enhanced by introducing surface functional groups such as carboxyl groups. High loading of MOFs (>30 wt %) has been previously reported when using 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-oxidized cellulose nanofibers (TO-CNFs) with surface carboxyl groups as the substrate for the interfacial synthesis of MOFs toward pollution remediation,27 thermal insulation,28 energy storage,29 and volatile organic compound separation.30 However, the potential of using surface carboxylated CNFs for developing strong and durable sorbents for CO2 capture has not yet been explored.

In our previous study, a hierarchical 3D network of cellulose microfibrils was prepared from wood through a top-down delignification process, followed by TEMPO-mediated oxidation at neutral conditions.31 This TEMPO-oxidized wood (TO-wood) showed a highly mesoporous cell wall structure with fibrillated but naturally aligned cellulose microfibrils and demonstrated high mechanical performance. Herein, we report a facile approach to fabricate foam-like cellulose/MOF composites with prominent mechanical properties, good thermal stability, and high CO2 adsorption capacity using TO-wood structure as the template. The carboxyl groups in the fibrillated cell wall of TO-wood facilitated interfacial coordination to copper (Cu2+)-, zinc (Zn2+)-, and aluminum (Al3+)-based MOFs and promoted their growth in situ, thus increasing the loading of MOFs. The specific surface area, CO2 adsorption capacities, multicycle durability under temperature swing adsorption, and compressive mechanical properties of the TO-wood/MOF composites were studied to demonstrate their potential application as a strong and durable sorbent for efficient CO2 capture.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Balsa wood (Ochroma pyramidale) was purchased from Materials AB, Sweden. Cu(NO3)2·(H2O)3, Al(NO3)3, Zn(NO3)2·(H2O)6, benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (H3BTC), 2-methylimidazole, TEMPO, sodium chlorite, and sodium hypochlorite were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Germany and used as received.

2.2. Preparation of the TO-Wood Template

As shown in Scheme 1, a balsa wood block with a dimension of 10 × 10 × 10 mm3 was delignified with 1 wt % sodium chlorite in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.6) at 80 °C for 12 h. The delignified wood was then oxidized with a TEMPO/NaClO2/NaClO system at pH 6.8 for 48 h following the method reported in our previous work.31 After TEMPO-mediated oxidation, the wood blocks were further washed in an ethanol/water mixture (1:1, v/v) to remove residue chemicals and minimize swelling in water, producing the TO-wood.

Scheme 1. Schematic Diagram of the Synthesis Procedure for the Foam-like TO-Wood/MOF Composite Using Copper Benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate [Cu3(BTC)2].

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

2.3. Synthesis of TO-Wood/MOF Composites

The in situ synthesis of copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate [Cu3(BTC)2] in TO-wood was carried out in one pot (Scheme 1). The wet TO-wood samples (150 mg dry mass) were preincubated in 50 mL of 95% (v/v) ethanol containing 0.145 mol L–1 Cu(NO3)2·(H2O)3 for 3 h to allow the adsorption of the Cu2+ ion. Subsequently, the organic ligand (H3BTC, 0.08 mol L–1) was added into the incubation solution and kept at 80 °C overnight to produce the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite. The molar ratio between Cu2+ and H3BTC and their concentration in ethanol were adopted from a previously reported synthesis method for TO-CNF/MOF aerogel.27 The total reaction volume was chosen to ensure that the wood samples were completely submerged in ethanol in order to achieve a rather homogeneous growth of MOFs inside the wood template. Thus, an excessive amount of Cu2+ (more than 50 times higher than the amount of carboxylate in TO-wood) was applied. Following the above procedure and strategy, 0.2 mol L–1 Al(NO3)3 and 0.2 mol L–1 H3BTC were used to prepare the TO-wood/aluminum benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (AlBTC) composite.18 For the synthesis of TO-wood/zinc 2-methylimidazolate [Zn(MeIm)2] composite, 0.08 mol L–1 Zn(NO3)2·(H2O)6 and 1.6 mol L–1 2-methylimidazole were used for the synthesis.24 The above as-prepared TO-wood/MOF composites were washed thoroughly with methanol and dried with supercritical CO2 to obtain the respective composites. Delignified wood/MOF composites were also prepared using the same procedure for comparison. For neat MOF synthesis, an identical method was used in the absence of TO-wood. After the synthesis, suspensions of neat MOFs were washed with methanol several times to remove unreacted chemicals and then dried under vacuum.

2.4. Characterizations

The microstructure of the composites was studied by using field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Japan). The cross section perpendicular to the fiber axial direction was trimmed with a sliding microtome (Leica SM2010 R) prior to synthesis for ease of observation. The cross section parallel to the fiber axial direction was observed on the interior of the peeled open TO-wood/MOF composites. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Spectrum 100 FT-IR Spectrometer (PerkinElmer, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained on a PANalytical X’Pert PRO powder diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical, UK) equipped with a Cu Kα source. N2 physisorption test was carried out on 3Flex (Micromeritics, USA). The specific surface area was measured from the adsorption isotherm in the relative pressure range between 0.01 and 0.2 according to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The mass contents (wt %) of copper, aluminum, and zinc in the composites were measured with an inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy (ICP–OES) method by a Thermo Scientific iCAP 600 series instrument. Prior to ICP–OES measurements, 0.1 g of dry powder of each sample was hydrolyzed with 72% (w/w) H2SO4 assisted with an autoclave. Typical wavelengths were used to determine the concentration of Cu: 204.3 nm, 219.9 nm, and 224.7 nm; Al: 308.2, 394.4, and 396.1 nm; and Zn: 202.5, 206.2, and 213.8 nm. The average concentration obtained at different wavelengths was taken for the evaluation of MOF loading contents in the composites. Thermal stability of dried neat MOFs and the TO-wood/MOF composites was measured on a Mettler Toledo TGA/DSC1 (Switzerland). Samples were heated from 50 to 800 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1. Gravimetric CO2 adsorption capacity and temperature swing cyclic CO2 adsorption/desorption test were carried out on a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) instrument (Discovery TGA, TA instruments Co. Ltd., America) equipped with both CO2 and N2 gas tanks at atmospheric pressure. The sample was first outgassed under a N2 flow at 105 °C for 1 h to drive out adsorbed CO2 and then cooled down to 25 °C. The CO2 adsorption process was then carried out in a CO2 flow at 25 °C for 150 min. Cyclic adsorption/desorption was performed by repeating the abovementioned two steps. The compression test was performed on a universal mechanical tester (Instron-5566, Instron, USA) equipped with a 10 kN loading cell at a strain rate of 10% min–1, 23 °C, 50% relative humidity. Elastic modulus was determined from the initial linear deformation region of stress–strain curves.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of the TO-Wood/MOF Composites

Through TEMPO-mediated oxidation in neutral condition, C6 hydroxyls on the surface of cellulose microfibrils in the delignified wood cell wall were selectively oxidized to carboxyl groups. To avoid extensive fibrillation during the washing step and maintain the structural integrity of the natural wood structure, the TO-wood sample was washed in an ethanol/water mixture (1:1. v/v) after the TEMPO oxidation. The content of carboxyl groups in the TO-wood was 0.66 mmol g–1 as determined by conductometric titration. FE-SEM revealed that the cross-sectional surface perpendicular to the fiber axial direction of TO-wood showed a honeycomb-like cellular structure similar to native balsa wood, indicating good structural integrity (Figure 1a).32 The hexagonal cells were slightly transformed into a round shape due to the reduced cell wall rigidity.31 Mesopores (2–50 nm) and macropores (>50 nm) were observed in the cell wall of TO-wood (Figure 1b). N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of TO-wood showed a combination of type II and IV isotherms,33 with a type H3 hysteresis loop and no limiting adsorption at high p/p0 (Figure 2a), indicating the presence of both macro- and mesoporous structures with slit-like pores, similar to the TO-CNF/silica aerogel.34 The BET specific surface area (SBET) of the TO-wood was 172 m2 g–1 (Table S1, Supporting Information), about 30% lower than that reported in our previous work (249 m2 g–1).31 This is due to the lack of extensive washing step with water, which limited the separation of individualized cellulose microfibrils and swelling of the cell wall.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

FE-SEM micrographs of the surfaces perpendicular (cross section) and parallel (cell wall surface) to the fiber axial direction for (a,b) TO-wood and (c,d) TO-wood-Cu2+.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of (a) TO-wood, TO-wood adsorbed with Cu2+ (TO-wood–Cu2+), TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite, and neat Cu3(BTC)2 and (b) neat AlBTC, TO-wood/AlBTC composite, neat Zn(MeIm)2, and TO-wood/Zn(MeIm)2 composite samples.

The in situ synthesis of MOFs using the wood cell wall as the template was carried out in one pot, and TO-wood was first incubated with Cu2+ to form the TO-wood–Cu2+ complex (TO-wood–Cu2+) through chelation. To characterize the TO-wood adsorbed with Cu2+, the sample was collected, washed with methanol, and dried by supercritical drying. The adsorbed amount of Cu2+ in TO-wood was 1.23 mmol/g, as measured by ICP–OES. This value is higher than the carboxylate content of TO-wood, indicating the unspecific binding of Cu2+ ion to cellulose, as reported previously.35 The ionic crosslinking of carboxylated cellulose microfibrils in TO-wood cell wall with divalent Cu2+ has led to a well-preserved native cellular structure (Figure 1c). Interconnection of microfibril bundles through thin fibrils was observed from the FE-SEM micrograph of the cell wall surface (Figure 1d). The SBET of the TO-wood–Cu2+ sample was increased to 197 m2 g–1 (Table S1) with the mesoporous type IV isotherms preserved (Figure 2a). This is due to the introduction of multivalent ions that strengthened the interfibrillar interaction between cellulose microfibrils, and thus, aggregation of cellulose microfibrils and collapse of the cellulose network during supercritical CO2 drying were minimized. A similar effect was also reported for the TO-CNF network, in which the SBET of TO-CNF xerogel increased from 340 to 410 m2 g–1 after crosslinking with Al3+.36

The never-dried TO-wood was preincubated with Cu2+ for 3 h, and the organic ligand H3BTC was then added in the same pot and kept at 80 °C overnight. Thus, Cu3(BTC)2 was synthesized in situ inside the TO-wood structure. After washing with methanol and drying with supercritical CO2, the foam-like TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite with an uniform turquoise color intrinsic to Cu3(BTC)237 was obtained. The loading of Cu3(BTC)2 in the composite was 44.2 wt %, as calculated from the copper mass content measured by ICP–OES. The N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm of the composite (Figure 2a) showed a typical type I isotherm for microporous solid with small external surface,33 which was contributed by the highly microporous Cu3(BTC)2. Neat Cu3(BTC)2 exhibited a high SBET of 1368 m2 g–1 (Table S1). After the in situ growth of Cu3(BTC)2 in TO-wood, a high SBET value of 471 m2 g–1 was obtained for the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite. As a comparison, the delignified wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite showed a SBET value of 136 m2 g–1 (Figure S1, Supporting Information) due to the much lower loading of Cu3(BTC)2 crystals (10.0 wt %) (Table S1).

In addition to Cu2+, the carboxyl groups in the TO-wood template can easily chelate with a series of multivalent ions including Al3+, Pb2+, Ba2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Fe3+, Zn2+, and so forth.27,38−40 Thus, besides Cu3(BTC)2, in situ syntheses of Zn(MeIm)2 and AlBTC in TO-wood were also successfully performed via a similar procedure using different metal salts and organic ligands.

3.2. Structure of the TO-Wood/MOF Composites

The FT-IR spectra of TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2, TO-wood/Zn(MeIm)2, TO-wood/AlBTC composites, neat TO-wood, and corresponding neat MOFs are compared in Figure 3a. All TO-wood/MOF composites showed an absorption peak of C=O stretching vibration mode at 1730 cm–1 originated from the hemicellulose in TO-wood.31 The band appeared at 1645 cm–1 in all three composites can be attributed to the following: (1) the asymmetric stretching vibration of carboxylate from BTC chelating with Cu2+ and Al3+ or (2) the C=C stretching vibration mode of the imidazole ring in Zn(MeIm)2, which were identified in the spectra of neat MOFs but not in the spectrum of neat TO-wood.41−43 The symmetric vibration peak of the carboxyl group of TO-wood in the carboxylate form shifted from 1605 cm–1 in neat TO-wood to around 1580–1570 cm–1 in the composite due to its chelation with multivalent metal ions.24,44,45 In addition, peaks at 729 and 759 cm–1 in all three TO-wood/MOF composites were assigned to the out-of-plane bending vibrations of the ring structure in either BTC or 2-methylimidazole, which were also observed for neat MOFs.42,46 Besides, the peak at 1147 cm–1 was attributed to the ring C–N stretching that is associated with 2-methylimidazole in Zn(MeIm)2.47 A unique band at 770 cm–1 emerged in the IR spectrum of TO-wood/AlBTC was related to the formation of the Al3+–COO– chelation complex.28,48

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) FTIR spectra and (b) XRD patterns of neat MOFs, neat TO-wood, and various TO-wood/MOF composites.

The successful synthesis of MOFs was also confirmed by XRD analysis. Both neat TO-wood and TO-wood/MOF composites showed two broad peaks centered at 2θ = 14.8–16.8 and 22.5° (Figure 3b), corresponding to the diffraction of (11̅0), (110), and (200) planes of cellulose I crystals, respectively. In addition, peaks at 2θ = 5.9, 6.8, 9.7, 11.9, 13.8, 17.8, and 19.4° in TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 and neat Cu3(BTC)2 (Figure 3b) were the characteristic peaks of regular (111), (200), (220), (222), (400), (333), and (440) planes of Cu3(BTC)2, respectively.24,49,50 Peaks at 2θ = 7.2, 13.0, 16.8, and 18.4° that can be attributed to (110), (211), (310), and (222) planes of Zn(MeIm)2 were also identified for both TO-wood/Zn(MeIm)2 and neat Zn(MeIm)2.24,27 The characteristic peaks of AlBTC were difficult to be identified in TO-wood/AlBTC except for the weak and broad peak at 2θ = 11.0°. This was due to the large structural diversification typical for micro- and mesoporous AlBTC, showing broad and weak diffraction patterns for neat AlBTC.18 A similar XRD pattern has been previously reported when the synthesis of AlBTC was carried out in the presence of ethanol, where mainly the MIL-100 phase was formed.51−53 Compared to the simulated XRD pattern of MIL-100 (Figure S2, Supporting Information), the major broad peaks in the patterns of as-synthesized AlBTC and TO-wood/AlBTC composite were shown to closely relate to MIL-100 crystals. These results suggested that the chelation of carboxyl groups of TO-wood with multivalent ions substantially enhanced the nucleation and in situ growth of MOFs homogeneously inside TO-wood.28

Indeed, all three types of MOFs were homogeneously synthesized inside the TO-wood cell wall, leaving the lumen spaces empty for efficient mass conduction, as observed from the cross-sectional surfaces perpendicular to the fiber axial direction of the composites by FE-SEM (Figure 4a–c). The major difference was the localization and distribution of different MOF crystals due to their sizes. Image analysis revealed that the crystal sizes of Cu3(BTC)2, Zn(MeIm)2, and AlBTC were in the range of 0.5–5 μm, 0.5–2 μm, and 20–100 nm, respectively (Figure S3, Supporting Information). The Cu3(BTC)2 crystals were found in both inner lumen surface and intercellular region (middle lamella) (Figure 4a). The Zn(MeIm)2 crystals were embedded partially in the inner lumen cell wall (Figure 4b). On the other hand, the AlBTC crystals were much smaller and mainly in the form of agglomerated conformation (Figure 4c). The TO-wood cell wall was monolithically and homogeneously covered with nanoscale AlBTC crystals.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

FE-SEM micrographs of low (×600) and high (×10k) magnifications showing the cellular structure and cell wall corner region in the cross-sectional surfaces perpendicular to the fiber direction and the cell wall surfaces parallel to the fiber axial direction for (a,d) TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2, (b,e) TO-wood/Zn(MeIm)2, and (c,f) TO-wood/AlBTC composites, respectively. The inset photographs show the physical appearance of the composites.

The distribution of MOFs within the wood structure was further characterized on interior surfaces of composites parallel to the fiber direction. The samples were peeled to expose the cell wall surface of the fiber cells inside the composites and observed by FE-SEM (Figure 4d–f). The Cu3(BTC)2 crystals were grown on the entire surface of fiber cells of TO-wood (Figure 4d). FE-SEM micrograph with higher magnification for the cross section of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite revealed that cellulose microfibrils were attached on the surface of Cu3(BTC)2 crystals that were grown inside the cell wall (Figure S4, Supporting Information), indicating the coordination between TO-wood and Cu3(BTC)2.28 The distribution of Zn(MeIm)2 crystals was rather heterogeneous and scattered along the fiber cell surface with large cell wall surface areas exposed (Figure 4e). The particle size of AlBTC crystals was below 100 nm and AlBTC nanocrystals were embedded in the cellulose microfibril network (Figure 4f). The reason for high loading of Cu3(BTC)2 (44.2 wt %) in TO-wood can be attributed to the higher affinity of Cu2+ to the C6 carboxyl groups of TO-CNFs compared to Zn2+.35 Therefore, more metal ions were adsorbed and served as nucleation sites for the synthesis of MOFs. Indeed, the adsorbed amount of Zn2+ to TO-wood was 0.31 mmol/g, as measured by ICP–OES, much lower than that for Cu2+ (1.23 mmol/g). Thus, it resulted in a lower loading of Zn(MeIm)2 in the composite (11.3 wt %). Interestingly, the adsorbed amount of Al3+ to TO-wood was 0.30 mmol/g, but the loading of AlBTC crystals in the composites was remarkably high (42.7 wt %). This is probably due to the reason that an excess amount of AlBTC was synthesized in the bulk solution and trapped inside the cell wall because of its small particle size (20–100 nm). The TO-wood/Zn(MeIm)2 and TO-wood/AlBTC composites also showed enhanced BET surface areas of 92 and 361 m2 g–1 (Figure 2b and Table S1) as compared to 37 and 38 m2 g–1 for delignified wood/Zn(MeIm)2 and delignified wood/AlBTC (Figure S1 and Table S1), respectively. The higher loading of MOFs and large surface area thus can endow TO-wood/MOF composites with competitive CO2 adsorption performance.

The decomposition behavior of the TO-wood/MOF composites was studied by TGA. As shown in Figure 5, the decomposition of TO-wood started at around 240 °C due to the thermal degradation of cellulose. The structural decomposition of neat Cu3(BTC)2 took place at a higher temperature, in the range of 320–400 °C, after a first stage of water evaporation (∼100 °C) and a second stage of decomposition of low-quality crystals (∼220 °C).54 The TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite showed an enhanced thermal stability as compared to TO-wood. It showed two main decomposition stages at 270–330 and 330–370 °C due to the decomposition of TO-wood and Cu3(BTC)2, respectively. Similarly, the incorporation of Zn(MeIm)2 and AlBTC also improved the thermal stability of TO-wood. Neat Zn(MeIm)2 is highly thermally stable and showed a profile of nearly constant weight up to 570 °C. The in situ growth of Zn(MeIm)2 in TO-wood led to the increase of the initial decomposition temperatures of TO-wood/Zn(MeIm)2 to 250 °C. Neat AlBTC showed a multistage decomposition profile in the range of 275–650 °C. Compared to TO-wood, the decomposition of TO-wood/AlBTC started at a higher temperature of 255 °C, with a second decomposition stage in the range of 320–620 °C due to the high loading of AlBTC in the composite.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Thermogravimetric curves and (b) corresponding first derivative weight loss curves of neat MOFs, TO-wood, and the TO-wood/MOF composites.

3.3. CO2 Adsorption/Desorption Performance

CO2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of neat wood template, neat MOFs, and TO-wood/MOF composites were recorded using TGA equipped with gas tanks containing pure dry CO2 and N2, respectively. The adsorption of CO2 was performed at 25 °C and atmospheric pressure after an initial drying with N2 at 105 °C. Moreover, desorption was conducted right after adsorption with a constant flow of N2 at 105 °C. Neat Cu3(BTC)2 MOFs exhibited the highest CO2 adsorption capacity of 2.49 mmol g–1, which is equivalent to 11.0 wt % CO2 uptake (Figure 6a). This is consistent with the previously reported result that the maximum CO2 adsorption to Cu3(BTC)2 at 295 K and 0.1 MPa was 2.46 mmol g–1 through physical trapping of CO2 molecules.55 Neat TO-wood also showed a CO2 adsorption capacity of 0.2 mmol/g, which was caused by the binding of CO2 to the carboxyl group through dipolar interaction.56 As a result of in situ growth of MOFs inside TO-wood, the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite showed a high CO2 adsorption capacity of 1.46 mmol g–1. Cu3(BTC)2 contains coordinatively unsaturated metal sites for CO2 adsorption, which is greatly beneficial when used for cyclic CO2 adsorption.57 This enables Cu3(BTC)2 to be the favored MOF material for CO2 capture and storage. On the contrary, the CO2 adsorption capacities of neat Zn(MeIm)2 and AlBTC at 25 °C and atmospheric pressure were 0.30 and 0.87 mmol g–1, about 8 and 3 times lower than that of neat Cu3(BTC)2. These results were in line with the literature result where ZIF-8 showed CO2 capacity around 0.4 mmol g–1 at 25 °C and 1 bar.58 Therefore, the TO-wood/Zn(MeIm)2 and To-wood/AlBTC composites showed lower CO2 adsorption capacities of 0.25 and 0.43 mmol g–1, respectively.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) CO2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of neat MOFs, neat TO-wood, and various TO-wood/MOF composites. (b) Temperature swing cyclic CO2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite (adsorption under CO2 at 25 °C and desorption under N2 at 105 °C).

The CO2 adsorption capacities and conditions of several wood- or cellulose-based sorbents are summarized in Table 1. At ambient condition, the CO2 adsorption capacity of TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 in this work is superior to that of the wood- or cellulose-based CO2 sorbents loaded with PEI,59 acetylated CNCs,60 and zeolite61 and is comparable to that of the APTES-grafted TO-CNFs/silica aerogels.34 Although the TO-CNFs/PEI foam showed a high CO2 adsorption capacity of 2.22 mmol g–1 at 80% RH, contribution from water is negligible. The same material tested at a lower humidity of 20% RH showed only one-fourth of its maximum capacity.62 Moreover, CO2 sorption sites, primarily amine groups, in amine-grafted sorbents are often gradually deactivated after the cyclic regeneration process, that is, thermal-driven desorption at higher temperature.62−64 As a consequence, the maximum CO2 capacity of TO-CNFs/PEI foam decreased 27% after five cycles of adsorption/desorption at 25 and 85 °C.62 7% capacity loss after 10 cycles was also reported on PEI crosslinked cellulose triacetate aerogel when desorption was conducted at 105 °C.65 MOFs are generally thought as thermally stable with thermal decomposition temperatures higher than 300 °C.66 To have a better understanding of the reversibility and thermal stability of CO2 adsorption by the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite, cyclic CO2 adsorption/desorption test was performed. The CO2 adsorption capacity during the first cycle was 1.46 mmol g–1. After six cycles of adsorption/desorption at 25 and 105 °C, 1.47 mmol g–1 CO2 capacity was measured (Figure 6b), demonstrating the excellent multicycle durability.

Table 1. CO2 Adsorption Capacity of Various Wood- or Cellulose-Based CO2 Sorbents.

  capacity mmol g–1 pressure temperature (°C) humidity
TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 1.46 atmospheric pressure 25 dry
delignified wood/PEI59 1.11 atmospheric pressure 25 dry
CNFs/acetylated CNCs60 1.14 101 kPa 0 dry
TO-CNFs/gelatin/zeolite61 ∼1.3 750 mmHg 35 dry
TO-CNFs/silica/APTES34 1.49 atmospheric pressure 25 dry
TO-CNFs/PEI62 2.22 ambient 25 80% RH
TO-CNFs/PEI62 0.5 ambient 25 20% RH
Open in a new tab

3.4. Compressive Mechanical Properties

Typical compressive stress–strain curves of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composites and TO-wood are shown in Figure 7. The TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite and TO-wood had low densities of 107.4 ± 5.5 and 61.1 ± 4.3 kg m–3, respectively. When the loading was parallel to the fiber axial (longitudinal) direction, both TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite and TO-wood showed initial linear elastic deformation with rapid increase of compressive stress at compressive strain lower than 2% (Figure 7a). After the yielding point, both materials showed plastic deformation plateaus at moderate strain before entering a final densification phase, during which the stress increased exponentially. The deformability of TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 was considerably better than those of inorganic monolithic sorbents since no catastrophic failure of materials was observed, demonstrating good mechanical integrity. Compared to neat TO-wood, the elastic modulus of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite was increased from 125.4 ± 26.2 to 326.2 ± 7.5 MPa, indicating the positive effect of ionic crosslinking by Cu2+ on the stiffness of the TO-wood template, which was also reported on the TO-CNF hydrogel crosslinked with multivalent ions.36 The yield strain of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite was about 3.5%, higher than 2.2% for TO-wood, which is owing to the enhanced energy dissipation with the addition of MOFs. The compressive yield strength of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite was 7.3 ± 0.1 MPa, 3 times higher than that of the neat TO-wood (2.4 ± 0.4 MPa). This is due to (1) the crosslinking effect of Cu2+, which led to the improved resistance to yield the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite, and (2) the reinforcing effect of MOFs on the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite through a strong interfacial interaction with the TO-wood cell wall, which was also reported for the ZIF-8 reinforced wood composite.24

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Typical compressive stress–strain curves of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite and TO-wood with the loading (a) parallel to the fiber axial direction, i.e., longitudinal direction and (b) perpendicular to the fiber axial direction, i.e., transverse direction. The insets are the corresponding stress–strain curves in the strain range of 0–10%.

Due to the inherent anisotropy of wood, TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 showed different deformation behaviors in the transverse direction (Figure 7b). Both TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite and TO-wood showed good compressibility. The TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite showed a short linear elastic region up to a compressive strain of 5%, followed by a stress plateau in the range of 5–60% compressive strain, in which the cell wall was collapsed gradually.67 Thereafter, a rapid densification region appeared, indicating the elimination of cell wall porosity. Similar compressive stress–strain behavior was also reported for the ultralight TO-CNF/MIL-53 aerogel.28 The elastic modulus and yield strength of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite were 3.5 ± 0.4 and 0.20 ± 0.04 MPa, respectively, which are still considerably high. As a comparison, the neat TO-wood barely showed a yielding phenomenon and was gradually densified as the compressive strain increased to 90%, with a 10 times lower elastic modulus recorded at 0.36 ± 0.05 MPa.

The mechanical properties of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite were exceptional as compared with various monolithic CO2 sorbents summarized in Table 2. Although the compressive elastic modulus and yield strength of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite in the axial direction were ca. 40% of those of the delignified wood/PEI composite,59 the density of TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 was only 30% of that of delignified wood/PEI (343.6 ± 15.3 kg m–3). The specific elastic modulus (Es: 3034 kN m kg–1) and specific yield strength (σs: 68 kN m kg–1) of TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 in the axial direction were remarkably high. These values were also higher than those for cellulose-based CO2 sorbents such as APTES-grafted TO-CNF/silica aerogel,34 anisotropic CNF aerogel impregnated with acetylated CNC,60 and anisotropic foam of TO-CNFs/gelatin/zeolite.61 Moreover, in comparison to MOF-loaded monolithic CO2 sorbents, the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite was 2 orders of magnitude stronger than the graphene/ZIF-8 aerogel22 and 3D-printed MOF/clay/PVA monoliths,19 suggesting TO-wood as a much more robust template for structuring MOFs into a monolith than using an inorganic substrate or polymer-based binders.

Table 2. Compressive Mechanical Performance of Various CO2 Monolithic Sorbentsa.

  test direction elastic modulus (MPa) yield strength (MPa) specific elastic modulus (kN m kg–1) specific yield strength (kN m kg–1)
TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 axial 326.2 (7.5) 7.3 (0.1) 3034 68
TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 transverse 3.5 (0.4) 0.20 (0.04) 33 2
delignified wood/PEI59 axial 756 18 2200 52
CNF/silica aerogel34 isotropic 0.18 0.03 22 4
CNF/acetyl-CNCs aerogel60 axial 0.30 0.02 20 2
TO-CNFs/gelatin/zeolite61 axial 2.2   147  
Graphene/ZIF8 aerogel22 isotropic 0.28 0.02 12 1
PVA/clay/MOF-74(Ni)19 axial 12 0.48 13 0.5
PVA/clay/UTSA-16(Co)19 axial 25 0.55 15 0.3
Open in a new tab
a

The values in parentheses are the sample standard deviations.

4. Conclusions

In summary, foam-like TO-wood/MOF composites were successfully prepared by the in situ synthesis of Cu3(BTC)2, Zn(MeIm)2, and AlBTC in a TO-wood template. The surface carboxyl group on the cellulose microfibrils in the TO-wood facilitated the interfacial coordination of multivalent metal ions and subsequent MOF nucleation and growth in the wood cell wall. The TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite had a high loading (44.2 wt %) of Cu3(BTC)2, a large BET surface area of 471 m2 g–1, and a high CO2 adsorption capacity of 1.46 mmol g–1 at 25 °C and atmospheric pressure, higher than those for the TO-wood/Zn(MeIm)2 and TO-wood/AlBTC composites. Besides, the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite maintained the maximum capacity during the temperature swing cyclic CO2 adsorption test, demonstrating good multicycle durability. Moreover, the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite was exceptionally strong in the longitudinal direction (fiber axial) with a remarkably high specific elastic modulus of 3034 kN m kg–1 and a high specific yield strength of 68 kN m kg–1 ever reported for solid CO2 sorbents. This study introduced a facile strategy to address the interfacial coordination of MOFs to the wood cell wall and significantly increased the loading of MOFs in the wood structure and therefore achieved the foam-like composites combining the versatile functionalities of MOFs and the mechanical robustness of wood. The TO-wood/MOF composites are also promising for various possible applications in environmental remediation, gas separation and purification, insulation, and catalysis and will be further investigated in the future.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Wallenberg Wood Science Center for supporting this work. S.W. and C.W. would like to acknowledge the China Scholarship Council for financial support during PhD study. The authors are grateful to Dr. F. Tan for the XRD measurement and Y. Yang for the ICP–OES characterization.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c06637.

  • N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of delignified wood/MOF composites; comparison of XRD patterns of TO-wood/AlBTC, as-synthesized neat AlBTC, and simulated MIL-100; histograms of size distribution for the MOF particles in the composites; FE-SEM image for the cross section of the TO-wood/Cu3(BTC)2 composite at higher magnification; and MOF contents and BET surface areas of the delignified wood/MOF composites and TO-wood/MOF composites (PDF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

am1c06637_si_001.pdf (344.1KB, pdf)

References

  1. Schoedel A.; Ji Z.; Yaghi O. M. The Role of Metal–organic Frameworks in a Carbon-neutral Energy Cycle. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16034. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ojuva A.; Akhtar F.; Tomsia A. P.; Bergström L. Laminated Adsorbents with Very Rapid CO2 Uptake by Freeze-casting of Zeolites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 2669–2676. 10.1021/am400122r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drese J. H.; Choi S.; Lively R. P.; Koros W. J.; Fauth D. J.; Gray M. L.; Jones C. W. Synthesis-Structure-Property Relationships for Hyperbranched Aminosilica CO2 Adsorbents. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 3821–3832. 10.1002/adfm.200901461. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tian W.; Zhang H.; Sun H.; Suvorova A.; Saunders M.; Tade M.; Wang S. Heteroatom (N or N-S)-Doping Induced Layered and Honeycomb Microstructures of Porous Carbons for CO2 Capture and Energy Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 8651–8661. 10.1002/adfm.201603937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sevilla M.; Valle-Vigón P.; Fuertes A. B. N-Doped Polypyrrole-Based Porous Carbons for CO2 Capture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 2781–2787. 10.1002/adfm.201100291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heydari-Gorji A.; Belmabkhout Y.; Sayari A. Polyethylenimine-impregnated Mesoporous Silica: Effect of Amine Loading and Surface Alkyl Chains on CO2 Adsorption. Langmuir 2011, 27, 12411–12416. 10.1021/la202972t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vilarrasa-García E.; Cecilia J. A.; Santos S. M. L.; Cavalcante C. L.; Jiménez-Jiménez J.; Azevedo D. C. S.; Rodríguez-Castellón E. CO2 Adsorption on APTES Functionalized Mesocellular Foams Obtained from Mesoporous Silicas. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 187, 125–134. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.12.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim C.; Cho H. S.; Chang S.; Cho S. J.; Choi M. An Ethylenediamine-grafted Y Zeolite: a Highly Regenerable Carbon Dioxide Adsorbent via Temperature Swing Adsorption Without Urea Formation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1803–1811. 10.1039/c6ee00601a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Choi S.; Gray M. L.; Jones C. W. Amine-tethered Solid Adsorbents Coupling High Adsorption Capacity and Regenerability for CO2 Capture From Ambient Air. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 628–635. 10.1002/cssc.201000355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li Z.; Liu P.; Ou C.; Dong X. Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Carbon Dioxide Adsorption and Separation at Low Pressure. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 15378–15404. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chakraborty A.; Roy S.; Eswaramoorthy M.; Maji T. K. Flexible MOF–aminoclay Nanocomposites Showing Tunable Stepwise/Gated Sorption for C2H2, CO2 and Separation for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 8423–8430. 10.1039/c6ta09886j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chakraborty A.; Achari A.; Eswaramoorthy M.; Maji T. K. MOF-aminoclay Composites for Superior CO2 Capture, Separation and Enhanced Catalytic Activity in Chemical Fixation of CO2. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11378–11381. 10.1039/c6cc05289d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huo H.; Fu C.; Harms K.; Meggers E. Asymmetric Catalysis with Substitutionally Labile yet Stereochemically Stable Chiral-at-metal Iridium(III) Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2990–2993. 10.1021/ja4132505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sutar P.; Bakuru V. R.; Yadav P.; Laha S.; Kalidindi S. B.; Maji T. K. Nanocomposite Hydrogel of Pd@ZIF-8 and Laponite®: Size-Selective Hydrogenation Catalyst under Mild Conditions. Chem. - Eur. J. 2021, 27, 3268–3272. 10.1002/chem.202004345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chakraborty A.; Sutar P.; Yadav P.; Eswaramoorthy M.; Maji T. K. Charge-Assisted Self-Assembly of ZIF-8 and Laponite Clay toward a Functional Hydrogel Nanocomposite. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 14480–14483. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang W.; Zhang M.; Huang S.; Wu D. Tunable Luminescent Heterometallic Zn2Ln2 Edge-Defective Molecular Cubane with Stimuli-Responsive Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 6768–6771. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Samanta A.; Zhao A.; Shimizu G. K. H.; Sarkar P.; Gupta R. Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 51, 1438–1463. 10.1021/ie200686q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li L.; Xiang S.; Cao S.; Zhang J.; Ouyang G.; Chen L.; Su C.-Y. A Synthetic Route to Ultralight Hierarchically Micro/mesoporous Al(III)-carboxylate Metal-organic aerogels. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1774. 10.1038/ncomms2757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thakkar H.; Eastman S.; Al-Naddaf Q.; Rownaghi A. A.; Rezaei F. 3D-Printed Metal-Organic Framework Monoliths for Gas Adsorption Processes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35908–35916. 10.1021/acsami.7b11626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Qian D.; Lei C.; Hao G.-P.; Li W.-C.; Lu A.-H. Synthesis of Hierarchical Porous Carbon Monoliths with Incorporated Metal-organic Frameworks for Enhancing Volumetric based CO2 Capture Capability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 6125–6132. 10.1021/am301772k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sachse A.; Ameloot R.; Coq B.; Fajula F.; Coasne B.; De Vos D.; Galarneau A. In situ Synthesis of Cu-BTC (HKUST-1) in Macro-/Mesoporous Silica Monoliths for Continuous Flow Catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4749–4751. 10.1039/c2cc17190b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang M.; Li H.; Zhou L.; Xing R.; Zhang J. Hierarchically Porous Graphene/ZIF-8 Hybrid Aerogel: Preparation, CO2 Uptake Capacity, and Mechanical Property. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 827–834. 10.1021/acsami.7b17728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guo R.; Cai X.; Liu H.; Yang Z.; Meng Y.; Chen F.; Li Y.; Wang B. In Situ Growth of Metal-Organic Frameworks in Three-Dimensional Aligned Lumen Arrays of Wood for Rapid and Highly Efficient Organic Pollutant Removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 2705–2712. 10.1021/acs.est.8b06564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tu K.; Puértolas B.; Adobes-Vidal M.; Wang Y.; Sun J.; Traber J.; Burgert I.; Pérez-Ramírez J.; Keplinger T. Green Synthesis of Hierarchical Metal-Organic Framework/Wood Functional Composites with Superior Mechanical Properties. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902897. 10.1002/advs.201902897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Su M.; Zhang R.; Li H.; Jin X.; Li J.; Yue X.; Qin D. In situ Deposition of MOF199 onto Hierarchical Structures of Bamboo and Wood and Their Antibacterial Properties. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 40277–40285. 10.1039/c9ra07046j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Qin H.; Zhou Y.; Huang Q.; Yang Z.; Dong R.; Li L.; Tang J.; Zhang C.; Jiang F. Metal Organic Framework (MOF)/Wood Derived Multi-cylinders High-Power 3D Reactor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 5460–5468. 10.1021/acsami.0c21664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhu L.; Zong L.; Wu X.; Li M.; Wang H.; You J.; Li C. Shapeable Fibrous Aerogels of Metal-Organic-Frameworks Templated with Nanocellulose for Rapid and Large-Capacity Adsorption. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4462–4468. 10.1021/acsnano.8b00566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou S.; Apostolopoulou-Kalkavoura V.; Tavares da Costa M. V.; Bergström L.; Strømme M.; Xu C. Elastic Aerogels of Cellulose Nanofibers@Metal–Organic Frameworks for Thermal Insulation and Fire Retardancy. Nano-Micro Lett. 2019, 12, 9. 10.1007/s40820-019-0343-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhou S.; Kong X.; Zheng B.; Huo F.; Strømme M.; Xu C. Cellulose Nanofiber @ Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks for High-Performance Flexible Supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 9578–9586. 10.1021/acsnano.9b04670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhou S.; Strømme M.; Xu C. Highly Transparent, Flexible, and Mechanically Strong Nanopapers of Cellulose Nanofibers @Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 3515–3520. 10.1002/chem.201806417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li K.; Wang S.; Chen H.; Yang X.; Berglund L. A.; Zhou Q. Self-Densification of Highly Mesoporous Wood Structure into a Strong and Transparent Film. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2003653. 10.1002/adma.202003653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fu Q.; Ansari F.; Zhou Q.; Berglund L. A. Wood Nanotechnology for Strong, Mesoporous, and Hydrophobic Biocomposites for Selective Separation of Oil/Water Mixtures. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2222–2230. 10.1021/acsnano.8b00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thommes M.; Kaneko K.; Neimark A. V.; Olivier J. P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso F.; Rouquerol J.; Sing K. S. W. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. 10.1515/pac-2014-1117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jiang F.; Hu S.; Hsieh Y.-l. Aqueous Synthesis of Compressible and Thermally Stable Cellulose Nanofibril–Silica Aerogel for CO2 Adsorption. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 6701–6710. 10.1021/acsanm.8b01515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Dong H.; Snyder J. F.; Williams K. S.; Andzelm J. W. Cation-induced Hydrogels of Cellulose Nanofibrils with Tunable Moduli. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 3338–3345. 10.1021/bm400993f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yamasaki S.; Sakuma W.; Yasui H.; Daicho K.; Saito T.; Fujisawa S.; Isogai A.; Kanamori K. Nanocellulose Xerogels With High Porosities and Large Specific Surface Areas. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 316. 10.3389/fchem.2019.00316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chui S. S.; Lo S. M.; Charmant J. P.; Orpen A. G.; Williams I. D. A Chemically Functionalizable Nanoporous Material. Science 1999, 283, 1148–1150. 10.1126/science.283.5405.1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shimizu M.; Saito T.; Isogai A. Water-resistant and High Oxygen-barrier Nanocellulose Films with Interfibrillar Cross-linkages formed through Multivalent Metal Ions. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 500, 1–7. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fukuzumi H.; Saito T.; Okita Y.; Isogai A. Thermal Stabilization of TEMPO-oxidized Cellulose. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 1502–1508. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Saito T.; Isogai A. Ion-exchange Behavior of Carboxylate Groups in Fibrous Cellulose Oxidized by the TEMPO-mediated System. Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 61, 183–190. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lin R.; Ge L.; Diao H.; Rudolph V.; Zhu Z. Ionic Liquids as the MOFs/Polymer Interfacial Binder for Efficient Membrane Separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 32041–32049. 10.1021/acsami.6b11074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Dhumal N. R.; Singh M. P.; Anderson J. A.; Kiefer J.; Kim H. J. Molecular Interactions of a Cu-Based Metal-Organic Framework with a Confined Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid: A Combined Density Functional Theory and Experimental Vibrational Spectroscopy Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 3295–3304. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hu Y.; Liu Z.; Xu J.; Huang Y.; Song Y. Evidence of Pressure Enhanced CO2 Storage in ZIF-8 Probed by FTIR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9287–9290. 10.1021/ja403635b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nam D.-H.; Bushuyev O. S.; Li J.; De Luna P.; Seifitokaldani A.; Dinh C.-T.; García de Arquer F. P.; Wang Y.; Liang Z.; Proppe A. H.; Tan C. S.; Todorović P.; Shekhah O.; Gabardo C. M.; Jo J. W.; Choi J.; Choi M.-J.; Baek S.-W.; Kim J.; Sinton D.; Kelley S. O.; Eddaoudi M.; Sargent E. H. Metal-Organic Frameworks Mediate Cu Coordination for Selective CO2 Electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11378–11386. 10.1021/jacs.8b06407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhu C.; Soldatov A.; Mathew A. P. Advanced Microscopy and Spectroscopy Reveal the Adsorption and Clustering of Cu(II) onto TEMPO-oxidized Cellulose Nanofibers. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 7419–7428. 10.1039/c7nr01566f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hu Y.; Kazemian H.; Rohani S.; Huang Y.; Song Y. In situ High Pressure Study of ZIF-8 by FTIR Spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12694–12696. 10.1039/c1cc15525c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang Y.; Jia Y.; Hou L. A. Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 on Polyester Fiber for PM2.5 Removal. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 31471–31477. 10.1039/c8ra06414h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Embrechts H.; Kriesten M.; Ermer M.; Peukert W.; Hartmann M.; Distaso M. In situ Raman and FTIR Spectroscopic Study on the Formation of the Isomers MIL-68(Al) and MIL-53(Al). RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 7336–7348. 10.1039/c9ra09968a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shen T.; Liu T.; Mo H.; Yuan Z.; Cui F.; Jin Y.; Chen X. Cu-based Metal-organic Framework HKUST-1 as Effective Catalyst for Highly Sensitive Determination of Ascorbic Acid. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 22881–22890. 10.1039/d0ra01260b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun B.; Kayal S.; Chakraborty A. Study of HKUST (Copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate, Cu-BTC MOF)-1 Metal Organic Frameworks for CH4 Adsorption: An Experimental Investigation with GCMC (Grand Canonical Monte-carlo) Simulation. Energy 2014, 76, 419–427. 10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Seoane B.; Dikhtiarenko A.; Mayoral A.; Tellez C.; Coronas J.; Kapteijn F.; Gascon J. Metal Organic Framework Synthesis in the Presence of Surfactants: towards Hierarchical MOFs?. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 1693–1700. 10.1039/c4ce02324b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lestari W. W.; Al Adawiyah R.; Khafidhin M. A.; Wijiyanti R.; Widiastuti N.; Handayani D. S. CO2 Gas Separation Using Mixed Matrix Membranes based on Polyethersulfone/MIL-100(Al). Open Chem. 2021, 19, 307–321. 10.1515/chem-2021-0033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Xia W.; Zhang X.; Xu L.; Wang Y.; Lin J.; Zou R. Facile and Economical Synthesis of Metal–organic Framework MIL-100(Al) Gels for High Efficiency Removal of Microcystin-LR. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 11007–11013. 10.1039/c3ra40741a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fernández-Catalá J.; Casco M. E.; Martínez-Escandell M.; Rodríguez-Reinoso F.; Silvestre-Albero J. HKUST-1@ACM Hybrids for Adsorption Applications: A Systematic Study of the Synthesis Conditions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 237, 74–81. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.09.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhao Y.; Seredych M.; Jagiello J.; Zhong Q.; Bandosz T. J. Insight into the Mechanism of CO2 Adsorption on Cu–BTC and its Composites with Graphite Oxide or Aminated Graphite Oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 239, 399–407. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Huang N.; Chen X.; Krishna R.; Jiang D. Two-dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks for Carbon Dioxide Capture Through Channel-wall Functionalization. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 2986–2990. 10.1002/anie.201411262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Trickett C. A.; Helal A.; Al-Maythalony B. A.; Yamani Z. H.; Cordova K. E.; Yaghi O. M. The Chemistry of Metal–organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture, Regeneration and Conversion. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17045. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.45. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. McEwen J.; Hayman J.-D.; Ozgur Yazaydin A. A Comparative Study of CO2, CH4 and N2 adsorption in ZIF-8, Zeolite-13X and BPL Activated Carbon. Chem. Phys. 2013, 412, 72–76. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2012.12.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang C.; Biswas S. K.; Okubayashi S. Polyethylenimine-Impregnated Mesoporous Delignified Wood with High Mechanical Strength for CO2/N2 Selective Adsorption. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 5499–5508. 10.1021/acsanm.0c00799. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wei J.; Geng S.; Hedlund J.; Oksman K. Lightweight, Flexible, and Multifunctional Anisotropic Nanocellulose-based Aerogels for CO2 Adsorption. Cellulose 2020, 27, 2695–2707. 10.1007/s10570-019-02935-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Valencia L.; Rosas W.; Aguilar-Sanchez A.; Mathew A. P.; Palmqvist A. E. C. Bio-based Micro-/Meso-/Macroporous Hybrid Foams with Ultrahigh Zeolite Loadings for Selective Capture of Carbon Dioxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 40424–40431. 10.1021/acsami.9b11399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sehaqui H.; Gálvez M. E.; Becatinni V.; cheng Ng Y.; Steinfeld A.; Zimmermann T.; Tingaut P. Fast and Reversible Direct CO2 Capture from Air onto All-polymer Nanofibrillated Cellulose-polyethylenimine Foams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 3167–3174. 10.1021/es504396v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhai Y.; Chuang S. S. C. Enhancing Degradation Resistance of Polyethylenimine for CO2 Capture with Cross-Linked Poly(vinyl alcohol). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 13766–13775. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03636. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Drage T. C.; Arenillas A.; Smith K. M.; Snape C. E. Thermal Stability of Polyethylenimine based Carbon Dioxide Adsorbents and Its Influence on Selection of Regeneration Strategies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 116, 504–512. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang C.; Okubayashi S. Polyethyleneimine-crosslinked Cellulose Aerogel for Combustion CO2 Capture. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 225, 115248. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Healy C.; Patil K. M.; Wilson B. H.; Hermanspahn L.; Harvey-Reid N. C.; Howard B. I.; Kleinjan C.; Kolien J.; Payet F.; Telfer S. G.; Kruger P. E.; Bennett T. D. The Thermal Stability of Metal-organic Frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 419, 213388. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213388. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Huang C.; Gong M.; Chui Y.; Chan F. Mechanical Behaviour of Wood Compressed in Radial Direction-part I. New Method of Determining the Yield Stress of Wood on the Stress-strain Curve. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 186–195. 10.1016/j.jobab.2020.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

am1c06637_si_001.pdf (344.1KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES