Abstract
Engeletin is a natural derivative of Smilax glabra rhizomilax that exhibits anti-inflammatory activity and suppresses lipid peroxidation. In the present study, we sought to elucidate the mechanistic basis for the neuroprotective and pro-angiogenic activity of engeltin in a human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation (OGD/R) model system and a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rat model of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury. These analyses revealed that engeletin (10, 20, or 40 mg/kg) was able to reduce the infarct volume, increase cerebral blood flow, improve neurological function, and bolster the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), vasohibin-2 (Vash-2), angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), phosphorylated human angiopoietin receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (p-Tie2), and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1/CD31) in MCAO rats. Similarly, engeletin (100, 200, or 400 nM) markedly enhanced the migration, tube formation, and VEGF expression of HUVECs in an OGD/R model system, while the VEGF receptor (R) inhibitor axitinib reversed the observed changes in HUVEC tube formation activity and Vash-2, VEGF, and CD31 expression. These data suggested that engeletin exhibited significant neuroprotective effects against cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats, and improved cerebrovascular angiogenesis by modulating the VEGF/vasohibin and Ang-1/Tie-2 pathways.
Keywords: Engeletin, Angiogenesis, Oxygen-glucose deprivation reperfusion, Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion, VEGF/vasohibin pathway, Ang-1/Tie-2 pathway
Introduction
Strokes are highly debilitating cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events that are occurring with increasing frequency (1). Approximately 85% of these events are ischemic strokes that arise as a consequence of vascular occlusion (2). Stroke patients are typically treated using a combination of endovascular, thrombolytic, and adjuvant approaches (3,4). However, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administration is only effective within 4.5 h following stroke (5), and as such, relatively few patients are eligible to undergo this treatment (6). It is therefore essential that the mechanistic basis for cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (CI/R) injury be better understood in order to protect against permanent disability or death in affected patients. Multiple studies have determined that promoting vascular remodeling is an effective means of restoring the blood supply in this pathogenic context (7), highlighting this as a promising therapeutic modality.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (8) is a key mediator of angiogenesis (9), promoting processes such as the proliferation, survival, growth, and migration of endothelial cells (10). VEGF-treated endothelial cells produce vasohibin-1 (Vash-1) (11), which heterodimerizes with small vasohibin-binding protein (SVBP) within cells to drive Vash-1 secretion and the consequent negative feedback for angiogenesis (12). In contrast, CD11b-positive bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells and cancer cells express the homologous Vash-2 protein, which stimulates angiogenic processes (13). Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) is a pericyte-derived protein that drives vascular remodeling and angiogenesis by signaling through its cognate receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (Tie-2) on endothelial cells (14). Through these mechanisms, the VEGF/vasohibin pathway controls angiogenesis while the Ang-1/Tie-2 pathway modulates the permeability and stability of the newly formed vasculature.
Engeletin, which is also referred to as rhamnoside of dihydrokaempferol, is a bioactive derivative of Smilax glabra rhizomilax. In prior research, engeletin has shown anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity in vitro (15) and ability to further suppress the growth of cervical and lung cancer cells (16,17). Herein, we explored the protective activity of engeletin in the context of CI/R injury and assessed the underlying mechanisms whereby it regulates angiogenesis.
Material and Methods
Drugs and reagents
Engeletin (>99.0% pure, molecular weight: 434.39, CAS: 572-31-6) was obtained from SenBeiJia Biological Technology (China) and was dissolved using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare a stock solution.
Axitinib (a VEGF receptor (R) inhibitor, Cat No. SC0137-25 mg) and anti-VEGF (Cat No. AV202) were purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology (China). Anti-vasohibin-1 antibody (Cat No.ab176114), anti-Ang-2 (Cat No. ab180820), and anti-Ang-1 (Cat No. ab102015) were from Abcam (UK). Anti-p-Tie2 (Cat No. SAB4503999) and anti-NeuN (Cat No. MEB377) were from Sigma (China). Vasohibin-2 (Cat No. 2923051) was obtained from EMD Millipore (Germany). HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cat No. A0208), HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (Cat No. A0216), mouse anti-actin (Cat No. AA128), and BeyoECL Plus (Cat No. P0018FS) were from Beyotime Biotechnology. The 4-0 filament (filament diameter: 0.25 mm; tip diameter: 0.34 mm) was purchased from Beijing Shadong Biology Company (China). RPMI-1640 (Cat No. 11875-093) was from Gibco (USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS; Cat No.13011-8611) was from Sijiqing (China).
Cell culture
HUVECs (ATCC, USA) were cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.
MCAO model establishment
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (220-250 g) were purchased from Jinan Pengyue (China) Experimental Animal Breeding Co., Ltd. (SPF grade, Certificate No. SYXK 20170018) and housed with access to food and water ad libitum for 7 days to facilitate acclimatization. Rats were then anesthetized via intramuscular injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), after which the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) procedure was conducted via a slightly modified version of previously published protocols (18). Briefly, the left common carotid artery was blocked, while the external carotid artery branches were divided following dissection, and a 4-0 filament was inserted into the internal carotid artery until resistance was detected. After 1.5 h, this filament was removed to facilitate reperfusion. For 24 h following surgery, rats were maintained at 24-25°C. The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publications No. 80-23, USA), revised in 1996, was followed when conducting all animal studies. All experiments and procedures were conducted with the approval of the Animal Care Guidelines of the Animal Experiment Committee of Binzhou Medical University (China; authorization number BYLY 2019-056).
Animal treatment groups
For dose-response studies, 60 rats were randomly assigned to 5 different treatment groups (12 per group): a sham group, an MCAO group, and three engeletin treatment groups (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg). At 15 min after reperfusion, appropriate engeletin doses were intraperitoneally administered to the indicated treatment groups, with sham and MCAO model animals being administered normal saline. At 24-h post-modeling, neurological function assays were performed. Rats were then anesthetized using ketamine and xylazine as above, and the optimal engeletin treatment dose was established by analyzing survival rates, brain water content, and infarct area (as assessed via 2,3,5-triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride [TTC] staining).
For mechanistic studies, 50 rats were randomized into five treatment groups (10 per group): a sham group, an MCAO group, an MCAO + engeletin (20 mg/kg ip) group, an MCAO+axitinib (10 mg/kg, ig) group, and an MCAO+engeletin+axitinib group. Engeletin and axitinib were administered continuously for 7 days. Cerebral blood flow was measured prior to MCAO and at 0, 72, and 168 h post-MCAO. On day 8, rats were euthanized and the cortical tissue around the ischemic penumbra was collected for immunohistochemical and western blotting analyses. Sham and MCAO model rats were administered appropriate volumes of normal saline in lieu of treatment.
Cerebral blood flow measurements
Cerebral blood flow was measured via moorFLPI-2 (Moor Instruments, UK), with measurements being made before MCAO modeling and at 0, 72, and 168 h post-engeletin treatment. Following blood flow measurements, engeletin or normal saline were administered as appropriate. Real-time flux data were obtained and analyzed with the moorFLPI-2 measurement software.
Neurological function tests
The modified neurological severity score in rats (mNSS) was assessed by a researcher blinded to experimental grouping (19). Briefly, neurological function was graded from 0 (normal) to 18 (severe neurological damage). Overall mNSS scores were assigned based upon a composite of reflex, balance, and sensory testing results, with one point being awarded for each task that an animal was unable to perform or each tested reflex that was absent.
Immunohistochemical analyses
Immunohistochemical staining was conducted as in prior reports (20). Briefly, 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) was used to fix brain tissues overnight before paraffin embedding. Next, serial 4-μm thick cerebral cortex sections were prepared, deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to 0.01 M citric acid treatment for 10 min in a microwave at 400 W. Sections were treated for 12 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity, blocked for 30 min with bovine serum albumin (BSA), and treated overnight with polyclonal antibodies specific for VEGF (Beyotime Biotechnology, 1:200), CD31 (Abcam, 1:50), and NeuN (Sigma, 1:100) at 4°C. Sections were then washed and probed using an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Beyotime Biotechnology) for 1 h at 37°C, after which samples were evaluated via light microscopy (Perkin Elmer, USA). Integrated absorbance values were calculated by Vectra 3 (Akoya Biosciences, USA) to determine the positive protein expression area as follows: integrated absorbance = positive area × average absorbance.
OGD/R model establishment
An in vitro oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation (OGD/R) model was established as in prior studies (21). Briefly, HUVECs were treated under hypoxic conditions for 4 h in Earle's solution that had been treated with N2 for 30 min prior to use. Hypoxia was achieved with a hypoxic incubator (Kendro; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., USA), with respective O2 and CO2 levels of 1.0 and 5.0%. At 4 h post-OGD, reoxygenation was conducted by exchanging this medium for standard serum-free culture media containing engeletin (0, 50, 100, 200, or 400 nM) in a normoxic incubator.
Cell proliferation assay
A CCK-8 assay was employed to test HUVEC viability based on manufacturer’s instructions (Beyotime Biotechnology). Briefly, HUVECs were added onto 96-well plates (6,000/well) for 24 h. Following OGD/R, cells were incubated with appropriate engeletin concentrations for 24 h, after which CCK-8 solution was added (10 μL/well) for 4 h at 37°C. Absorbance at 450 nm was then assessed with a Molecular Devices SpectraMax M 5 instrument (USA).
Proliferation was also assessed via flow cytometry. First, HUVECs were plated at 25×104 cells/well onto 6-well plates, followed by OGD/R and engeletin treatment as above. Cells were then harvested, fixed, stained, and assessed with a flow cytometer (BC Biosciences, USA) based upon PI staining results according to provided protocols.
Transwell assay
The impact of engeletin on cellular migration was assessed using 12-well Transwell assay inserts (3462, Corning, USA) as in priori reports (22). Briefly, HUVECs were resuspended in serum-free medium with engeletin (50, 100, 200, or 400 nM) in the upper chamber, while the lower chamber was filled with standard medium. Following a 24-h incubation, cells in the upper chamber were carefully removed with a swab, while the remaining cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet. Cells in three random fields of view per well were then counted via an inverted microscope (Olympus, Japan).
Wound healing assay
Cell migration was also evaluated via wound healing assay. Briefly, HUVECs were grown overnight to confluence in 6-well plates, after which a sterile 200-μL pipette was used to generate a scratch wound in the monolayer and PBS was used to wash the cells two times. Engeletin (50, 100, 200, or 400 nM) was then applied, and three random fields of view per image were analyzed at 0 and 24 h, with Photoshop software (Microsoft, USA) being used to quantify the degree of migration.
Tube formation assay
Capillary-like tube formation by HUVECs in Matrigel was used to measure the neovascularization-like activity of engeletin as detailed previously (23). Briefly, 24-well plates were coated for 30 min using Matrigel (180 μL; 356234, Corning) at 37°C. After polymerization was complete, cells were suspended in RPMI-1640 and applied to the Matrigel at 6×104 cells/well with appropriate engeletin concentrations (0, 50, 100, 200, or 400 nM) and axitinib (1 μM) for 6 h. An inverted microscope was then used to visualize tube structures, which were manually counted.
Western blotting
Western blotting was used to measure protein levels in cortical or cellular samples as discussed previously (24). Briefly, samples were lysed in RIPA buffer and centrifuged at 13,362 g for 15 min at 4°C. Protein samples (40 µg) were then separated via 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes that were blocked overnight with antibodies specific for VEGF, Vash-1, Vash-2, Ang-1, Ang-2, or p-Tie2. Blots were then washed, probed with secondary antibodies, and protein bands were visualized with BeyoECL Plus and an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Sage Creation, China).
Statistical analysis
Data were first tested for normal distribution. Non-normally distributed data are reported as medians and interquartile range, and were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test. Normally distributed data are reported as means±SD, and Levene's test of data homogeneity was performed. If the data were homogeneous (P>0.05), one-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey's test. If the Levene's test result was significant (P≤0.05), the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test was performed. All the analyses were conducted using SPSS 22.0 (IBM, USA).
Results
Effects of engeletin on infarct volume, brain water content, and neurological function
We began by exploring the dose-dependent impact of engeletin in the MCAO model system. At 24-h post-MCAO, 3, 2, 1, and 0 rats in the MCAO, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg engeletin groups had died, respectively. TTC staining was employed to assess the infarct volume in these rats, with ischemic and non-ischemic regions appearing white and red, respectively. The infarct volume in the MCAO group at 24 h post-CI/R was 23%, and decreased in a dose-dependent manner in the engeletin treatment groups such that it was significantly lower in rats treated with 20 and 40 mg/kg engeletin (F=7.281, P<0.05 and P<0.01) (Table 1). To explore the functional impact of such engeletin treatment, we additionally assessed rat neurological function via mNSS testing and found that the functional recovery of rats in all three engeletin treatment groups was significantly better than that of rats in the MCAO group (F=15.282, P<0.05 or P<0.01) (Table 1), with engeletin functioning in a dose-dependent manner. As such, a 20 mg/kg engeletin dose was selected for subsequent mechanistic studies.
Table 1. The dose-effect relationship of engeletin on cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats.
Group | Survival rate(%) | Infarct volume(%) | Brain water content(%) | Neurological function (score) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sham | 100 | - | 76.1±0.5 | - |
MCAO | 66.66 | 22.3±5.7 | 78.1±0.5## | 9.4±1.5 |
Engeletin, 10 mg/kg | 75 | 20.1±5.4 | 77.4±0.4 | 7.7±1.5* |
Engeletin, 20 mg/kg | 75 | 18.3±4.7* | 77.3±0.4* | 7.4±1.6** |
Engeletin, 40 mg/kg | 88.33 | 17.2±4.1** | 77.0±0.5** | 7.2±1.7** |
Data are reported as means±SD (n=12/group). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) group; ##P<0.01 vs sham group (ANOVA with Tukey's test).
Engeletin increased cerebral blood flow following MCAO
moorFLPI-2 was used to assess cerebral blood flow prior to MCAO and at 0, 72, and 168 h post-MCAO, revealing that the blood flow in the ischemic area was markedly decreased in MCAO model animals relative to sham controls. This blood flow increased slightly at 72 and 168 h post-MCAO relative to 0 h post-MCAO, but remained significantly higher in rats treated with engeletin (20 mg/kg; P<0.05) at 72 h (F=24.847) and 168 h (F=21.714) post-MCAO relative to untreated MCAO model group animals (Table 2). However, the administration of the VEGFR inhibitor axitinib (10 mg/kg) was sufficient to abolish this engeletin-dependent restoration of cerebral blood flow (F=35.429, P<0.05; Table 2).
Table 2. The impact of engeletin on mean cerebral blood flow in cerebral ischemia/reperfusion model rats.
Group | Before MCAO | MCAO (0 h) | 72 h | 168 h |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sham | 1123.5±150.7 | 1033.6±134.5 | 1145.6±169.3 | 1131.8±201.3 |
Model | 1131.9±127.9 | 505.6±88.4** | 870.5±325.8** | 820.4±213.4** |
Engeletin, 20 mg/kg | 1128.6±122.6 | 523.66±94.2** | 1040.7±342.1## | 950.4±265.1## |
Axitinib, 10 mg/kg | 1178.6±164.6 | 513.45±85.7** | 733.6±257.4** | 785.4±112.3** |
Axitinib, 10 mg/kg + engeletin 20 mg/kg | 1149.3±167.4 | 510.48±92.5** | 893.6±311.6* | 860.5±133.2* |
Data are reported as means±SD (n=10/group). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs sham group; ##P<0.01 vs Model group (ANOVA with Tukey's test).
Engeletin enhanced the expression of VEGF, CD31, Ang1, p-Tie2, and NeuN
MCAO model animals exhibited slight increases in VEGF expression relative to sham controls (Figure 1), whereas these levels were significantly elevated following engeletin (20 mg/kg) treatment (F=33.582, P<0.01). The expression of CD31, which is an angiogenesis marker, was also enhanced (F=6.050, P<0.01) in engeletin-treated rats relative to MCAO model rats (Figure 1), suggesting a rise in the number of vessels and a consequent increase in blood flow within the ischemic area. When neurons were examined in MCAO model animals, many appeared shrunken and damaged, consistent with potential neurological damage. In contrast, the morphology of these neurons was restored when treated with engeletin (F=28.317, P<0.01). Similarly, Ang-1 and p-Tie2 expression were markedly enhanced in engeletin-treated animals relative to MCAO model animals (Figure 2). Treatment with axitinib (10 mg/kg) was sufficient to suppress the beneficial effects of engeletin, as axitinib treatment was associated with significantly decreased VEGF, Ang-1, p-Tie2, NeuN, and CD31 expression relative to engeletin treatment alone (Figures 1 and 2).
Engeletin promoted HUVEC proliferation following OGD/R
A CCK-8 assay revealed that OGD/R treatment markedly impaired the viability of HUVECs, whereas engeletin treatment (200 and 400 nM) was sufficient to enhance the viability of these cells (F=34.165, P<0.01; Figure 3A). To further explore the protective properties of engeletin, cell cycle progression was also assessed, revealing a significant increase (F=45.528, P<0.01) in the ratio of G2/M phase cells following engeletin treatment (100-400 nM; Figure 3B). These findings supported a role for engeletin as being protective against OGD/R-induced damage in HUVECS.
Engeletin enhanced HUVEC migration and tube formation
Endothelial cell migration regulates angiogenesis, and as such, we performed transwell and wound healing assays to explore the impact of engeletin on HUVEC migration. Engeletin treatment (50-400 nM) was sufficient to enhance HUVEC migration in a Transwell assay in a dose-dependent manner relative to control treatment (F=17.136, P<0.01; Figure 4A and D). A wound healing assay yielded similar results (Figure 4B and E), with engeletin markedly enhancing healing relative to control treatment (F=27.728, P<0.01).
We also assessed the angiogenic activity of engeletin by comparing HUVEC morphologic differentiation into capillary-like structures in a Matrigel-based assay. While very few tubular structures were observed in untreated wells (Figure 4C and F), engeletin markedly enhanced the formation of these structures in a dose-dependent manner (F=77.345, P<0.05 or P<0.01). Notably, axitinib (1 μM) co-treatment was sufficient to inhibit the enhanced tube formation mediated by engeletin (F=156.606, P<0.05).
Effects of engeletin on the VEGF/vasohibin and Ang-1/Tie-2 pathways in vivo and in vitro
To understand the mechanisms whereby engeletin promotes angiogenesis, we next evaluated the expression of key proteins related to this pathway. Levels of Vash-1 (F=9.798) and Ang-2 (F=16.881) were enhanced relative to sham group animals (Figures 2 and 5; P<0.05 or P<0.01). Western blotting revealed that treatment with engeletin (20 mg/kg) was sufficient to enhance the expression of Ang-1 (F=14.701), p-Tie2 (F=12.703), Vash-2 (F=63.007), and VEGF (F=43.526), relative to the MCAO group (P<0.05 or P<0.01). In vitro analyses yielded results comparable to those of our in vivo experiments (Figures 6 and 7). Following engeletin treatment (50-400 nM), HUVECs exhibited markedly enhanced VEGF (F=39.537), Vash-2 (F=50.526), Ang-1, and p-Tie2 expression in a dose-dependent fashion (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Engeletin thus exhibited neuroprotective activity in the context of CI/R via promoting angiogenesis through mechanisms that may be associated with the VEGF/vasohibin and Ang-1/Tie-2 pathways.
To further extend these results, we treated cells and rats with axitinib to block VEGF receptor activation. Axitinib treatment (10 mg/kg) was sufficient to reduce VEGF and Vash-2 expression relative to engeletin treatment alone (F=16.446, P<0.01; Figure 5), whereas Vash-1 levels were increased in response to axitinib treatment relative to engeletin treatment alone (F=27.992, P<0.01). Similarly, engeletin-induced increases in CD31, VEGF, and Vash-2 expression were significantly suppressed by axitinib (Figures 1 and 5), which had no impact on the Ang-1/Tie-2 pathway (Figure 2). Our in vitro findings were comparable to these in vivo results, with the inhibitory effects of axitinib (1 μM) on Vash-2 expression being particularly obvious in HUVECs (F=179.962, P<0.01, Figure 7).
Discussion
VEGF is the primary endogenous driver of angiogenesis (25), promoting vascular endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and permeability. Vash-1 suppresses angiogenesis induction downstream of VEGF signaling via protein kinase C (PKC) (26). There is also evidence that Vash-1 suppresses the growth of tumors (27). Vash-2, in contrast, enhances intratumoral angiogenesis, and its function in the context of cerebral ischemia injury remains to be clarified (28). The VEGF/vasohibin signaling pathway may play a key role in a range of diseases owing to its ability to influence angiogenic signaling. As such, we measured VEGF, Vash-1, and Vash-2 protein levels in rats treated with engeletin and in HUVECs under similar experimental conditions. In all cases, engeletin promoted the expression of VEGF and Vash-2, whereas it suppressed Vash-1 expression relative to corresponding model groups. To confirm this mechanistic relationship, we additionally utilized the VEGF inhibitor axitinib, which markedly attenuated the beneficial effects of engeletin. Specifically, axitinib treatment was sufficient to suppress VEGF and Vash-2 expression and to enhance Vash-1 treatment. Overall, these data suggested that engeletin was able to promote VEGF and Vash-2 expression and to suppress Vash-1 expression in a dose-dependent manner. CD31 is a key endothelial cell marker (29), which was significantly upregulated after treatment with engeletin in MCAO model rats for 7 consecutive days, with VEGF and NeuN expression also being elevated following such treatment. However, these effects were reversed by axitinib treatment.
The promotion of angiogenesis is subsequently followed by differentiation and maturation (30), with VEGF being able to simultaneously induce vascular growth and permeability (31). Ang-1 is an oligomeric glycoprotein that binds to and signals through Tie-2 (32), thereby enhancing vascular stability and modulating associated permeability. Ang-1 binding to Tie-2 induces intracellular signaling that regulates endothelial cell survival, migration, and permeability (33). In contrast, Ang-2 functions as an antagonist that prevents Ang-1-induced Tie-2 phosphorylation, driving extensive angiogenesis and vascular destabilization (34). As such, we assessed Ang-1, Ang-2, and p-Tie2 levels in our experimental model systems. These analyses revealed that engeletin treatment significantly bolstered Ang-1 and p-Tie2 protein levels in vitro and in vivo, while simultaneously suppressing Ang-2 expression. We also found that axitinib did not impact the Ang-1/Tie-2 pathway in vivo. VEGF/vasohibin signaling is the primary driver of angiogenesis, while Ang-1/Tie-2 signaling is more important as a regulator of vascular maturation and stabilization (35). We confirmed that treatment with engeletin increased VEGF and Vash-2 expression and decreased Vash-1 expression in HUVECs and rats, while axitinib treatment reversed these effects. CD31, Ang-1, and p-Tie2 expression were also enhanced by engeletin, while Ang-2 was downregulated in response to such treatment. We therefore hypothesized that engeletin can mediate long-term protective angiogenesis in the context of CI/R injury via the VEGF/vasohibin and Ang-1/Tie-2 pathways.
Angiogenesis is a key mechanism that is central to long-term functional recovery following ischemic stroke (36). Endothelial cells migrate on an appropriate matrix and remodel into tubular structures, thereby forming an initial primitive vascular plexus (37). Herein, we assessed HUVEC migration through Transwell and wound healing assays and confirmed that engeletin treatment markedly enhanced the migratory abilities of these cells in both assays. These findings indicated that the VEGF/vasohibin and Ang-1/Tie-2 pathways mediated the enhancement of HUVEC migration and proliferation.
However, there are certain limitations to this study. First, we did not establish the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics relationship for this treatment in vivo or in vitro. Second, at the tested engeletin concentrations and doses, several of the analyzed endpoints were not normalized to control levels following treatment. Third, CI/R injury is a complex, multi-faceted disease. In this study, we solely focused on the effects of engeletin on angiogenesis, and in future studies we will continue to explore whether engeletin can act on other pathways to play a protective role in the context of CI/R injury.
In conclusion, we found that engeletin treatment enhanced angiogenesis both in vivo and in vitro. Engeletin treatment preserved cerebral blood flow, neurological function, and survival in vivo through a mechanism that may be associated with VEGF/vasohibin signaling-mediated enhancement of angiogenesis and the stabilization of these new vessels via the Ang-1/Tie-2 pathway. Overall, our data provided important evidence regarding the mechanisms underlying the regulation of angiogenesis in this pathological context and provided an important theoretical foundation for utilizing engeletin to treat cerebral ischemia.
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31570352 and 31170321), Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (Grant No. J18KA268), Shandong Medical and Health Science and Technology Development Plan Project (Grant No. 2017WS153), and the Binzhou Medical University Science and Technology Program (Grant No. BY2016KJ11).
References
- 1.Wang J, Xu Z, Chen X, Li Y, Chen C, Wang C, et al. MicroRNA-182-5p attenuates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting Toll-like receptor 4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;505:677–684. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sun K, Fan J, Han J. Ameliorating effects of traditional Chinese medicine preparation, Chinese materia medica and active compounds on ischemia/reperfusion-induced cerebral microcirculatory disturbances and neuron damage. Acta Pharm Sinica B. 2015;5:8–24. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hou S, Zhao MM, Shen PP, Liu XP, Sun Y, Feng JC. Neuroprotective effect of salvianolic acids against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2016:17. doi: 10.3390/ijms17071190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Poustchi F, Amani H, Ahmadian Z, Niknezhad SV, Mehrabi S, Santos HA, et al. Combination therapy of killing diseases by injectable hydrogels: from concept to medical applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:e2001571. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202001571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Urdaneta AE, Bhalla P. Cutting edge acute ischemic stroke management. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2019;37:365–379. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2019.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sun MS, Jin H, Sun X, Huang S, Zhang FL, Guo ZN, et al. Free radical damage in ischemia-reperfusion injury: an obstacle in acute ischemic stroke after revascularization therapy. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:3804979. doi: 10.1155/2018/3804979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lapi D, Colantuoni A. Remodeling of cerebral microcirculation after ischemia-reperfusion. J Vasc Res. 2015;52:22–31. doi: 10.1159/000381096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang K, Jing Y, Xu C, Zhao J, Gong Q, Chen S. HIF-1alpha and VEGF are involved in deferoxamine-ameliorated traumatic brain injury. J Surg Res. 2020;246:419–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pang Q, Zhao Y, Chen X, Zhao K, Zhai Q, Tu F. Apigenin protects the brain against ischemia/reperfusion injury via Caveolin-1/VEGF in vitro and in vivo . Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:7017204. doi: 10.1155/2018/7017204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Giannaccare G, Pellegrini M, Bovone C, Spena R, Senni C, Scorcia V, et al. Anti-VEGF treatment in corneal diseases. Curr Drug Targets. 2020;21:1159–1180. doi: 10.2174/1389450121666200319111710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nasu T, Maeshima Y, Kinomura M, Hirokoshi-Kawahara K, Tanabe K, Sugiyama H, et al. Vasohibin-1, a negative feedback regulator of angiogenesis, ameliorates renal alterations in a mouse model of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2009;58:2365–2375. doi: 10.2337/db08-1790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suzuki Y, Kobayashi M, Miyashita H, Ohta H, Sonoda H, Sato Y. Isolation of a small vasohibin-binding protein (SVBP) and its role in vasohibin secretion. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:3094–101. doi: 10.1242/jcs.067538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yamamoto M, Ozawa S, Ninomiya Y, Koyanagi K, Oguma J, Kazuno A, et al. Plasma vasohibin-1 and vasohibin-2 are useful biomarkers in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus. 2020;17:289–297. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00719-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van Meurs M, Kumpers P, Ligtenberg JJ, Meertens JH, Molema G, Zijlstra JG. Bench-to-bedside review: angiopoietin signalling in critical illness - a future target? Crit Care. 2009;13:207. doi: 10.1186/cc7153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang Z, Ji H, Shi J, Zhu X, Zhi Z. Engeletin attenuates abeta1-42-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation by Keap1/Nrf2 pathway. Inflammation. 2020;43:1759–1771. doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bai H, Yin H. Engeletin suppresses cervical carcinogenesis in vitro and in vivo by reducing NF-kappaB-dependent signaling. Biochemical Biophys Res Commun. 2020;526:497–504. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu T, Li Y, Sun J, Tian G, Shi Z. Engeletin suppresses lung cancer progression by inducing apoptotic cell death through modulating the XIAP signaling pathway: a molecular mechanism involving ER stress. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;128:110221. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Longa EZ, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, Cummins R. Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke. 1989;20:84–91. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.20.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen J, Li Y, Wang L, Zhang Z, Lu D, Lu M, et al. Therapeutic benefit of intravenous administration of bone marrow stromal cells after cerebral ischemia in rats. Stroke. 2001;32:1005–1011. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.4.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang H, Wang X, Zhang X, Wang H, Jiang W. Roxadustat attenuates experimental pulmonary fibrosis in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Lett. 2020;331:112–121. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ding C, Zhang J, Li B, Ding Z, Cheng W, Gao F, et al. Cornin protects SHSY5Y cells against oxygen and glucose deprivation-induced autophagy through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17:87–92. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li F, Liu Z, Sun H, Li C, Wang W, Ye L, et al. PCC0208017, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of MARK3/MARK4, suppresses glioma progression in vitro and in vivo . Acta Pharm Sinica B. 2020;10:289–300. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.El Atat O, Fakih A, El-Sibai M. RHOG activates RAC1 through CDC42 leading to tube formation in vascular endothelial cells. Cells. 2019;8:171. doi: 10.3390/cells8020171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu H, Wu Z, Wang X, Gao C, Liu R, Kang F, et al. Protective effects of combined treatment with mild hypothermia and edaravone against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury via oxidative stress and Nrf2 pathway regulation. Int J Oncol. 2020;57:500–508. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sato Y. The vasohibin family: a novel family for angiogenesis regulation. J Biochem. 2013;153:5–11. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvs128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hu XN, Ni Y, Luan J, Ding YZ. A review on vasohibin and ocular neovascularization. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13:1004–1008. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.06.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shen Z, Yan Y, Ye C, Wang B, Jiang K, Ye Y, et al. The effect of Vasohibin-1 expression and tumor-associated macrophages on the angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo . Tumour Biol. 2016;37:7267–7276. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4595-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Arata Y, Tanabe K, Hinamoto N, Yamasaki H, Sugiyama H, Maeshima Y, et al. Immunohistochemistry of vasohibin-2 in human kidney disease: implications in impaired glucose tolerance and reduced renal function. Acta Med Okayama. 2017;71:369–380. doi: 10.18926/AMO/55434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Delisser HM, Baldwin HS, Albelda SM. Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1/CD31): a multifunctional vascular cell adhesion molecule. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1997;7:203–210. doi: 10.1016/S1050-1738(97)00049-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee S, Chung M, Lee SR, Jeon NL. 3D brain angiogenesis model to reconstitute functional human blood-brain barrier in vitro . Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020;117:748–762. doi: 10.1002/bit.27224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Croll SD, Goodman JH, Scharfman HE. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in seizures: a double-edged sword. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;548:57–68. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6376-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chan W, Ismail H, Mayaki D, Sanchez V, Tiedemann K, Davis EC, et al. Fibulin-5 regulates Angiopoietin-1/Tie-2 receptor signaling in endothelial cells. PloS one. 2016;11:e0156994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Puddu A, Sanguineti R, Maggi D, Nicolo M, Traverso CE, Cordera R, et al. Advanced glycation end-products and hyperglycemia increase Angiopoietin-2 production by impairing Angiopoietin-1-Tie-2 system. J Diabet Res. 2019;2019:6198495. doi: 10.1155/2019/6198495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wakui S, Yokoo K, Muto T, Suzuki Y, Takahashi H, Furusato M, et al. Localization of Ang-1, -2, Tie-2, and VEGF expression at endothelial-pericyte interdigitation in rat angiogenesis. Lab Invest. 2006;86:1172–1184. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gui C, Zeng ZY, Chen Q, Luo YW, Li L, Chen LL. Neuregulin-1 promotes myocardial angiogenesis in the rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46:2325–2334. doi: 10.1159/000489622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang J. The role of reactive oxygen species in angiogenesis and preventing tissue injury after brain ischemia. Microvasc Res. 2019;123:62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2018.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lamalice L, Le Boeuf F, Huot J. Endothelial cell migration during angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2007;100:782–794. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000259593.07661.1e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]