Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):7077–7082.

The CD200/CD200R expression level and its mechanism of action in hematological malignancy patients

Yulei Zhao 1, Guohong Su 1, Jie Shen 1, Chunyan Liu 1, Na Miao 1
PMCID: PMC8290775  PMID: 34306467

Abstract

Objective: To explore the CD200/CD200R expression level in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of hematological malignancy patients and to analyze its mechanism of action. Methods: Thirty hematological malignancy patients who were hospitalized in our hospital from June 2019 to December 2019 were recruited as the study cohort and placed in the disease group, and 30 healthy people were also recruited for the study and placed in the healthy control group. The CD200/CD200R expression level in the two groups’ peripheral blood was measured using real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to measure the interleukin 17 (IL-17), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) expression levels in the two groups’ peripheral blood. We monitored the effects of the effective treatment on the CD200/CD200R level in the hematological malignancy patients. Results: Compared with the healthy group, the CD200 and CD200R mRNA expression level in the PBMC of the disease group was down-regulated, but the IL-17, TNF-α and IFN-γ expression levels in the peripheral blood plasma were up-regulated, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The CD200 and CD200R levels showed a negative correlation with the IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression levels in the hematological malignancy patients (P < 0.001). The CD200/CD200R expression level was significantly increased in the PBMC of the effectively treated hematological malignancy patients compared with their pre-treatment expression level, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: CD200/CD200R exhibits a low expression level in hematological malignancy patients, reducing the inhibitory effect on the inflammatory factor expressions, enhancing the inflammatory factors, and mediating the occurrence and development of hematological malignancies.

Keywords: Hematological malignancies, CD200, CD200R

Introduction

Hematological malignancies comprise a group of malignant clonal disorders arising from the hematopoietic tissues [1], including leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma, and they have a high morbidity and mortality [2,3]. An imbalance in the autoimmune homeostasis is a key factor leading to the occurrence of hematological malignancies, and numerous immune cells are involved in this process, such as autoreactive T cells, regulatory T cells, B cells, and monocytes. Numerous studies have found that T-cell dysfunction plays a decisive role in the occurrence of hematological malignancies, specifically the excessive activation of Th17 subtype cells, resulting in autoimmune hyperactivity in patients [4].

CD200 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that serves as a component of the immunoglobulin superfamily. It is expressed in a variety of cells, including B cells, T cells, and follicular dendritic cells [5]. The CD200 receptor (CD200R) is also expressed on the surfaces of T cells, macrophages, etc., and CD200 can transmit immunosuppressive signals through its binding to CD200R, and acts as a regulator of autoimmune dysfunction [6]. Consequently, we investigated the CD200/CD200R expression level and its mechanism of action in hematological malignancy patients in order to provide information to help gain an understanding of the hematological malignancy mechanism.

Materials and methods

Objects

Thirty hematological malignancy patients who were hospitalized in our hospital from June 2019 to December 2019 were recruited as the study cohort and placed in the disease group, which included 15 patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), 6 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 9 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Inclusion criteria (1) Patients over 18 years old. (2) Patients who met the diagnostic criteria for hematological malignancies issued by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Fungi Research Group [7]. (3) Patients able to follow medical advice to complete the relevant tests and diagnoses. (4) The patients were informed and signed the informed consent forms. Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients also suffering from active infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus. (2) Patients also suffering from liver and kidney dysfunction, or patients with blood loss symptoms within the past month. (3) Patients with mental disorders.

Thirty healthy patients who underwent physical examinations at our hospital during the same period and had qualified results were also recruited for the study and placed in the healthy control group. The differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, and body mass were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) (Table 1), so the two groups were comparable. This study was approved by our hospital’s ethics committee (approval no. 2019-252-01).

Table 1.

General data - the disease group vs. the healthy group [n (%), ± s]

Group n Sex (M/F) Age (years) Body mass (kg/m2)
Disease group 30 19/11 53.56 ± 11.45 23.82 ± 2.09
Healthy group 30 17/13 52.93 ± 12.08 23.57 ± 1.68
χ2/t 0.278 0.207 0.511
P 0.598 0.836 0.612

Therapeutic methods

ALL the patients were treated with chemotherapy using VDLP (vincristine + prednisone + daunorubicin + asparaginase). The NHL patients were treated with CHOP (mabthera + cyclophosphamide + adriamycin + vincristine + prednisone) chemotherapy, and the AML patients received chemotherapy with HA (homoharringtonine + cytarabine). Each patient with hematological malignancies received two cycles of chemotherapy in a 21-day cycle.

Instruments and reagents

Human lymphocyte separation medium (Sigma, P7794, USA), TRIzol (ThermoFisher Scientific, 15596018), reverse transcription PrimeScript RT Master Kit (Takara, Japan, RR036A), Sysmex XT-2100L automatic hematology analyzer and real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (ABI, USA, model: 7500). ELISA kits for interleukin 17 (IL-17), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (R&D, USA, DTA00D, DIF50, D1700).

Testing methods

(1) We collected 5 mL of fasting venous blood from the disease group before admission, and 5 mL of fasting venous blood from the healthy group on the day of the physical examination into vacuum anticoagulant tubes, which were shaken gently, and sent to the laboratory department. (2) Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR was used to measure the CD200/CD200R expression level in PBMC. The PBMC of each specimen was first isolated using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation, and the total RNA of the samples was extracted using the TRIzol method. cDNA was prepared for reverse transcription for future use according to the kit’s instructions. PCR amplification reactions were performed using the SYBR Green embedded dye method. The relative CD200 and CD200R expression levels in the observation group and the control group were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method and by taking β-actin as an internal reference gene. The PCR procedure and primers are shown in Table 2. (3) The plasma IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ protein concentrations were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and the operator strictly followed the kit’s instructions.

Table 2.

The PCR procedure and primers

CD200 CD200R
Upstream CCGTCAACAAAGGCTATTGG GACCAGAGAGGGTCTCACCA-
Downstream ATITAGGGCTCTCGGTCCTG CCGCTI’CGGCCACTAAGAAG
PCR procedure Step 1: 94°C 3 min, Step 2: 94°C 1 min, 60°C 1 min, 72°C 1 min, 30-40 cycles; Step 3: 72°C 5 min, Step 4: 4°C forever.

Statistical methods

SPSS 21.0 software was used for the data processing, and GraphPad prism 8.0 was used to draw the figures. The enumeration data were presented as rate (%), and χ2 tests were performed. The measurement data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), and t-tests were used. A correlation analysis was carried out using Spearman’s rank correlation test. P < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

The CD200/CD200R expression levels in the PBMC-disease group vs. the healthy group

The mRNA expression levels of CD200 and CD200R in PBMC were down-regulated in the disease group compared with the healthy group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=21.840, 16.780, P < 0.001), as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The CD200/CD200R expression level in PBMC - the disease group vs. the healthy group. # indicates P < 0.001.

The plasma IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression levels - the disease group vs. the healthy group

The plasma IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression levels were up-regulated in the disease group compared to the healthy group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=12.260, 24.770, and 15.460; all P < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3.

The plasma IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression levels - the disease group vs. the healthy group ( ± s)

Group n IL-17 (pg/mL) TNF-α (pg/mL) IFN-γ (pg/mL)
Disease group 30 63.95 ± 8.13 88.34 ± 9.56 60.42 ± 7.45
Healthy group 30 41.37 ± 5.97 37.96 ± 5.72 33.52 ± 5.94
t 12.260 24.770 15.460
P < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Analysis of the correlation of CD200 and CD200R with the IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression levels in the hematological malignancy patients

CD200 and CD200R showed a negative correlation with the IL-17 (t=-0.685, -0.621), TNF-α (t=-0.713, -0.682), and IFN-γ (t=-0.6393, -0.581) expression levels in the hematological malignancy patients (all P < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Analysis of the correlation of CD200 and CD200R with the IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression levels in hematological malignancy patients

Correlation with IL-17 in the plasma of hematological malignancy patients Correlation with TNF-α in the plasma of hematological malignancy patients Correlation with IFN-γ in the plasma of hematological malignancy patients



r P r P r P
C200 -0.685 < 0.001 -0.713 < 0.001 -0.639 < 0.001
CD200R -0.621 < 0.001 -0.682 < 0.001 -0.581 < 0.001

Monitoring the CD200/CD200R expression level in the peripheral blood PBMC of the hematological malignancy patients through effective treatment

A total of 13 patients achieved complete clinical remission, including 7 with NHL, 2 with AML, and 4 with ALL. The peripheral blood specimens were further collected from 13 patients, and it was found that the CD200/CD200R expression level was up-regulated compared with the pre-treatment levels, and a statistically significant difference was found (t=14.527 and 13.674, P < 0.001) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The CD200/CD200R expression level in the peripheral blood PBMC of hematological malignancy patients through effective treatment. *** indicates P < 0.001.

Discussion

The clinical treatment of hematological malignancies primarily depends on chemoradiotherapy. High doses of chemotherapeutic agents and radiation are effective at killing tumor cells while exerting a certain destructive effect on vascular endothelial cells and lymphocytes, whose destruction can inhibit bone marrow hematopoiesis and immune function during radiotherapeutic intervention [8,9], leading to a poor chemo-radiotherapeutic effect and affecting the prognosis [10,11]. This is mainly associated with the complex regulation of immune signaling networks involved in hematological malignancies [12]. Hence an in-depth understanding of the specific mechanisms of immune homeostasis imbalance in hematological malignancy patients is of great significance for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological malignancies.

CD200 is a leukocyte differentiation antigen that is widely expressed in a variety of cells and tissues [13,14]. However, due to its short intracellular segment, CD200 lacks modulators or binding sites that can transmit intracellular signals. Unlike CD200, the expression of its receptor CD200R is more restricted to cells in the myeloid and lymphoid lineages [15]. Accordingly, CD200 can function by binding to a receptor expressed on other cells (e.g. CD200R). At the time of binding to CD200R as its receptor, CD200 transmits response signals that affect diversified physiological systems. CD200/CD200R has been found to play an essential role in maintaining pulmonary macrophage homeostasis and protecting lung from excessive injury caused by inflammatory reactions [16]. Immune homeostasis imbalance plays a key role in the occurrence of hematological malignancies. Patients usually present with a hyper-expression of the Th1/17 cytokines, breaking their autoimmune tolerance and producing autoantibodies, thereby causing disease. Studies in animal models have shown that the pathological progression of CD200/CD200R myelodysplastic syndrome in model mice is markedly accelerated, and the progression of myelodysplastic syndrome is fully terminated or delayed following the up-regulation of CD200 expression [17]. Additionally, CD200R can promote the conversion of macrophages from M1 to M2 type [18] inhibiting the production of its inflammatory factors such as IL-17, TNF-α and IFN-γ [19]. Consequently, CD200/CD200R binding can affect the production of cytokines and lower the expression levels of the proinflammatory cytokines (IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ). IL-17, a representative of the Th1/17 cytokines, not only accelerates the recruitment and activation of neutrophils, it also induces the granulocyte-giant cell stimulating factor and IFN-γ, synergizes with TNF-α, and enhances the proinflammatory effect, and then further aggravates the condition. TNF-α, an initial initiator of the immune inflammatory reaction, can induce a release of various proinflammatory factors such as IL-1 and IL-6, which in turn initiate a waterfall cascade of inflammation exacerbating the patient’s condition. Our study found that the CD200/CD200R signaling molecules showed low expression levels in hematological malignancy patients and were negatively correlated with the IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ expression levels. These results indicated that the down-regulation of the CD200 expression will enhance the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines. Although CD200/CD200R molecules can suppress the immune system response and maintain the immune tolerance of the body, the ability to produce an inhibition of immunity after CD200/CD200R binding will be correspondingly weakened when the expression of CD200 is down-regulated, which is conducive to the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines and which ultimately causes an imbalance in the immune homeostasis. It has also been shown that the severe chronic enteritis symptoms will be attenuated in mice with high expressions of CD200 molecules compared with wild-type mice [20]. Therefore, we monitored the CD200/CD200R expression level in hematological malignancy patients using the effective treatment described in this study and found that the CD200/CD200R expression level in patients who achieved clinical complete remission was significantly up-regulated compared with the pre-treatment levels. These results indicated that CD200/CD200R1 signaling molecules are associated with the severity of hematological malignancies and have the potential to become indicators for monitoring hematological malignancy patients’ conditions in the future.

In conclusion, CD200/CD200R has a low expression level in hematological malignancy patients, reducing the inhibitory effect on the expression of the inflammatory factors, enhancing the inflammatory factors, and mediating the occurrence and development of hematological malignancies. However, because the study population was solely from our hospital and the cohort was small, it might not have the representability of general patients. Therefore, these results should be interpreted and generalized with caution.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Scientific and Technology Project of Cangzhou City (Grant no. 162302182).

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Carvajal LA, Neriah DB, Senecal A, Benard L, Thiruthuvanathan V, Yatsenko T, Narayanagari SR, Wheat JC, Todorova TI, Mitchell K, Kenworthy C, Guerlavais V, Annis DA, Bartholdy B, Will B, Anampa JD, Mantzaris I, Aivado M, Singer RH, Coleman RA, Verma A, Steidl U. Dual inhibition of MDMX and MDM2 as a therapeutic strategy in leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaao3003. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li S, Garrett-Bakelman FE, Chung SS, Sanders MA, Hricik T, Rapaport F, Patel J, Dillon R, Vijay P, Brown AL, Perl AE, Cannon J, Bullinger L, Luger S, Becker M, Lewis ID, To LB, Delwel R, Löwenberg B, Döhner H, Döhner K, Guzman ML, Hassane DC, Roboz GJ, Grimwade D, Valk PJ, D’Andrea RJ, Carroll M, Park CY, Neuberg D, Levine R, Melnick AM, Mason CE. Distinct evolution and dynamics of epigenetic and genetic heterogeneity in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Med. 2016;22:792–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.4125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abbasnezhad M, Rahmani A, Ghahramanian A, Roshangar F, Eivazi J, Azadi A, Berahmany G. Cancer care burden among primary family caregivers of Iranian hematologic cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:5499–505. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.13.5499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chang X, Zang X, Xia CQ. New strategies of DLI in the management of relapse of hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:324–32. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qiu M, Huang K, Liu Y, Yang Y, Tang H, Liu X, Wang C, Chen H, Xiong Y, Zhang J, Yang J. Modulation of intestinal microbiota by glycyrrhizic acid prevents high-fat diet-enhanced pre-metastatic niche formation and metastasis. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12:945–957. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0144-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu JQ, Talebian F, Wu L, Liu Z, Li MS, Wu L, Zhu J, Markowitz J, Carson WE 3rd, Basu S, Bai XF. A critical role for CD200R signaling in limiting the growth and metastasis of CD200+ melanoma. J Immunol. 2016;197:1489–97. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sahbudak Bal Z, Yilmaz Karapinar D, Karadas N, Sen S, Onder Sivis Z, Akinci AB, Balkan C, Kavakli K, Vardar F, Aydinok Y. Proven and probable invasive fungal infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from an university hospital, 2005-2013. Mycoses. 2015;58:225–32. doi: 10.1111/myc.12303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Domercant J, Polin N, Jahangir E. Cardio-oncology: a focused review of anthracycline-, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor-, and radiation-induced cardiotoxicity and management. Ochsner J. 2016;16:250–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saito Y, Susukida I, Uzuka Y, Kanai H. Noninvasive early detection of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with hematologic malignancies using the phased tracking method. Cancer Med. 2016;5:2276–85. doi: 10.1002/cam4.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Every-Palmer S, Inns SJ, Grant E, Ellis PM. Effects of clozapine on the gut: cross-sectional study of delayed gastric emptying and small and large intestinal dysmotility. CNS Drugs. 2019;33:81–91. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0587-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang H, Kaur G, Sankin AI, Chen F, Guan F, Zang X. Immune checkpoint blockade and CAR-T cell therapy in hematologic malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:59. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0746-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park JH, Geyer MB, Brentjens RJ. CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapeutics for hematologic malignancies: interpreting clinical outcomes to date. Blood. 2016;127:3312–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-02-629063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bain CC, Mowat AM. CD200 receptor and macrophage function in the intestine. Immunobiology. 2012;217:643–51. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen Z, Yu K, Zhu F, Gorczynski R. Over-expression of CD200 protects mice from dextran sodium sulfate induced colitis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0146681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rygiel TP, Karnam G, Goverse G, van der Marel AP, Greuter MJ, van Schaarenburg RA, Visser WF, Brenkman AB, Molenaar R, Hoek RM, Mebius RE, Meyaard L. CD200-CD200R signaling suppresses anti-tumor responses independently of CD200 expression on the tumor. Oncogene. 2012;31:2979–88. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Holt PG, Strickland DH. The CD200-CD200R axis in local control of lung inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1011–3. doi: 10.1038/ni0908-1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jaguin M, Houlbert N, Fardel O, Lecureur V. Polarization profiles of human M-CSF-generated macrophages and comparison of M1-markers in classically activated macrophages from GM-CSF and M-CSF origin. Cell Immunol. 2013;281:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jenmalm MC, Cherwinski H, Bowman EP, Phillips JH, Sedgwick JD. Regulation of myeloid cell function through the CD200 receptor. J Immunol. 2006;176:191–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Simelyte E, Criado G, Essex D, Uger RA, Feldmann M, Williams RO. CD200-Fc, a novel antiarthritic biologic agent that targets proinflammatory cytokine expression in the joints of mice with collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:1038–43. doi: 10.1002/art.23378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen Z, Yu K, Zhu F, Gorczynski R. Over-expression of CD200 protects mice from dextran sodium sulfate induced colitis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0146681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES