Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2019 Feb 5;6(6):1128–1137. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz018

Supramolecular nanoscale drug-delivery system with ordered structure

Xin Jin 1, Lijuan Zhu 1, Bai Xue 1, Xinyuan Zhu 1,, Deyue Yan 1,
PMCID: PMC8291525  PMID: 34691991

Abstract

Supramolecular chemistry provides a means to integrate multi-type molecules leading to a dynamic organization. The study of functional nanoscale drug-delivery systems based on supramolecular interactions is a recent trend. Much work has focused on the design of supramolecular building blocks and the engineering of supramolecular integration, with the goal of optimized delivery behavior and enhanced therapeutic effect. This review introduces recent advances in supramolecular designs of nanoscale drug delivery. Supramolecular affinity can act as a main driving force either in the self-assembly of carriers or in the loading of drugs. It is also possible to employ strong recognitions to achieve self-delivery of drugs. Due to dynamic controllable drug-release properties, the supramolecular nanoscale drug-delivery system provides a promising platform for precision medicine.

Keywords: supramolecular chemistry, drug-delivery system, host–guest recognition, self-delivery system, precision medicine

INTRODUCTION

Supramolecular chemistry engineers multiple non-covalent interactions together that gives rise to charming properties, including specificity, reversibility and tunability [1–3]. Although supramolecular affinities (including hydrogen bonding, metal chelation, hydrophobic interactions, π–π stacking and van der Waals interaction) are usually weak, most of them are capable of providing specific recognition on a molecular level [4–7]. Derived from the transient nature as well as molecular recognition, supramolecular chemistry has drawn great research focus over the past three decades and relative research won the Nobel Prize in 1987 and 2016 [8,9].

Supramolecular affinity is also crucial in bio-environments. Multiple supramolecular interactions co-exist within biological systems as a result of a delicate balance, resulting in the ordered and hierarchical structure and function of living organisms [10,11]. Inspired by nature systems, supramolecular interaction has been widely utilized in the biomedical field, such as in the construction of nanoscale drug-delivery systems [12,13]. The nanoscale drug-delivery system has been regarded as a preferable drug-administration strategy compared to free drugs [14]. Nano-carriers have been proven to not only improve drug solubility, but also limit off-site drug accumulation [15,16]. Moreover, the supramolecular design could incorporate some unique properties into the nanoscale drug-delivery system, such as molecular-level design and dynamic/recoverable properties, resulting in a feasible and novel drug-delivery strategy [17].

A large amount of research utilizing supramolecular affinity for nanoscale drug-delivery systems has been witnessed [18–23]. Our review focuses on the specific and highly organized drug-delivery systems designed with clear interacting mechanisms, such as host–guest interactions, polyvalent hydrogen bonding and nucleic acid base complementary pairing. Ordered nano-structures through metal coordination are covered in a large series of research that has been extensively reviewed elsewhere, so we exclude this part from our review. In discussed research, supramolecular interaction might play a dominant role either in delivery-carrier formation or in the therapeutic-loading process. In a typical nanoscale drug-delivery system, the carrier materials and therapeutic payloads are essential components, and there might be different principles for supramolecular design for nano-vehicles and loading methods. Therefore, we group the research work into (i) supramolecular drug carriers, (ii) supramolecular interaction-mediated drug loadings and (iii) supramolecular self-delivery systems, and review this work in different sections independently. In the next section (on supramolecular drug carriers), we focus on how to employ supramolecular interactions as the main driving force in building nanoscale drug carriers. In the third section, we introduce how supramolecular interaction has been used as the main linkage between vehicles and therapeutics. In the fourth section, we discuss a novel supramolecular delivery strategy for the therapeutics-only system, in which nanoscale delivery could be achieved through supramolecular interaction without carrier materials involved.

SUPRAMOLECULAR DRUG CARRIERS

A major demand on drug carriers is ‘smartness’, because diseases are always accompanied by local changes in pH, free radicals, over-expressed biomarkers or high concentrations of reactive oxygen species [24–27], so an ideal drug carrier should be able to respond to one or several of these changes in a rapid manner. Supramolecular nanoscale drug carriers have precisely designed chemical compositions and can offer engineered drug-release profiles after drug loading. Benefiting from the nature of non-covalent linkage, supramolecular nano-carriers are in a dynamic/reversible state so that a small change in the environment (including pH, ionic strength, temperature and oxidation) is sufficient to induce a dramatic response [28]. This unique feature makes them ‘smart’ therapeutic vehicles, and it is relatively easy for supramolecular nano-vehicles to achieve a disease-related triggered release of drug payloads, resulting in enhanced therapeutic specificity. At the same time, the balance of supramolecular systems is easily degraded under physiological conditions, leading to a fatal stability problem with unexpected loading exposure [29]. It is necessary for supramolecular-based delivery carriers to possess appropriate bio-stability, in order to overcome obstacles both in vitro and in vivo [30]. A supramolecular drug carrier is a balance between reliability and smartness, which can only be achieved though rational designs of the supramolecular building block. As most drug carriers are required to be hydrophilic, design principles with different supramolecular building blocks vary greatly. In the next section, we will focus on the design and function of nano-carriers based on supramolecular interaction, introducing several building approaches based on different types of supramolecular building blocks.

Polymeric supramolecular carriers

Supramolecular affinity can be utilized to construct polymer systems through the rational design of small-molecule units or macromolecule units. Acting as an extra and reliable linkage, supramolecular interaction can drive the units into an ordered and pre-designed architecture with different topologies, including linear chains [31–36], cross-linked networks [5], dendrimers [37,38], hyperbranched polymers [39–45], brushed polymers [46,47] and star polymers [48–54]. Benefiting from the dynamic nature of non-covalent interaction, supramolecularly engineered polymers usually respond to environmental change in a fast and precise way, which makes them good platforms for drug-delivery carriers. To date, various designs of supramolecular polymeric delivery carriers have been reported to achieve the successful delivery of chemo-drugs [55–58], therapeutic enzymes [59–61] and genetic materials [62–65].

In order to exhibit macromolecular behavior in a supramolecular polymer system, interactions with a high association constant (like host–guest recognition) are usually employed for maintaining a relatively large molecular weight [66]. The responsiveness of the carrier depends on the specific properties of the building blocks as well as the association constant of the supramolecular domain. Wumaier et al. designed a supramolecular plasmid DNA (pDNA) vector consisting of a cationic supramolecular block polymer with two building blocks: β-cyclodextrin conjugated polyethylene glycol (PEG-CD) and ferrocene conjugated pentaethylenehexamine with CD modification (Fc-PEHA-CD) (Fig. 1) [67]. The binding ability of such a supramolecular vector was achieved through the multivalent electrostatic interaction between DNA and PEHA blocks, forming a condensed genetic inner core protected from the PEG blocks. The resultant core–shell nanoparticle exhibited enhanced bio-stability and a high intracellular delivery capacity of DNA. Attributed from the reversible association and disassociation between β-CD and Fc, it also exhibited a fast-release pDNA under an H2O2 trigger in cancer cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of (a) supramolecular polymerization route of cationic supramolecular block copolymer, (b) pDNA condensing, and (c) intracellular delivery and H2O2-triggered release of pDNA in vitro. Adapted with permission from [67].

Peptide supramolecular carriers

Rationally designed amphiphilic peptides, which can form β-sheeted assembles and π–π interaction, are usually utilized for supramolecular assembly in order to obtain ordered nano-vehicles, such as fibers, sheets and ribbons [68–72]. A new example has employed Tat peptides conjugating with a RADA sequence to obtain supramolecularly assembled nanodrills for the intracellular delivery of hydrophobic therapeutics (Fig. 2) [73]. In this design, the cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) Tat derived from HIV1 donates a hydrophobic sequence, providing a high capacity for biological membrane penetration [74]; a RADA sequence modified with various phenylalanine (Phe, F) residues provides a supramolecular complex driving force with a β-sheet formation and π–π stacking. Relying on the hydrophobic region on such a nanodrill, hydrophobic therapeutics such as rapamycin can be easily encapsulated. Benefiting from Tat segments on the surface, the effective intracellular and induction of autophagy can be achieved in selected cell lines.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Structure illustration and assembly visualization (AFM tapping image and simulation illustration) of three designs of the Tat-RADA-Fn sequence: 2F-RT (a), 3F-RT (b) and 4F-RT (c). Encapsulation efficiency of autophagy inducer rapamycin (d-1) and the drug-release profile (d-2). Adapted with permission from [73].

Supramolecular liposome

The release efficiency in conventional liposomes has been regarded as a great challenge in clinical application. Although various stimuli-responsive liposomes have been developed, research on novel liposome systems with optimized controlled drug-release behavior is still in great demand. Differently from covalently bonded liposomes, supramolecularly engineered liposomes might have specialties, such as a fast response to exteriors and effective release of cargos. Inspired by the complementary interaction of base parings in natural DNA and RNA, Wang et al. have introduced such an interaction into a novel phospholipid system (Fig. 3). Base pairings are moderately strong, with specific direction resulting from the multivalent hydrogen bonding between adenine–uracil (A–U), adenine–thymine (A–T) and guanine–cytosine (G–C) [75,76]. In their work, hydrophilic head and hydrophobic tails of phospholipids are conjugated with a pair of nucleobases, respectively (Fig. 3b) [77]. These new types of phospholipid with nucleosides could marry each other via base-pairing recognition through a simple mixing procedure and self-assemble into liposome-like bi-layer nano-vehicles. Benefiting from the high sensitivity and acidic pH responsiveness, the supramolecular liposome, after drug loading, exhibited enhanced anticancer ability in vitro and in vivo. An additional functional benefit of this new generation of liposomes is that multiple choices of nucleobase pairs are available and a variety of phospholipid systems could be designed and easily obtained, depending on different therapeutic demands.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) Synthetic route, chemical structure of nucleoside phospholipids and (b) the schematic representation of the formation of supramolecular phospholipids. Adapted with permission from [77].

The design and construction of supramolecular nano-carriers are sparkled with wit and charm. Such carriers are also versatile for a variety of drug-loading strategies, obtaining optimized controlled release of drugs, among which passive drug encapsulation and covalent conjugation of drug molecules are used the most [78,79]. For the passive encapsulation mode, the encapsulation is realized through high hydrophobicity from drug molecules and the hydrophobic domain in supramolecular nano-vehicles. The slow drug-release rate is realized through the physical barrier from vehicle materials and could be further regulated through supramolecular affinity change. For covalent drug conjugation, most loaded drugs are well protected and in an inactive state until the liable linkage ruptures. The release rate of conjugated drugs is determined by the rate of bond cleavage.

SUPRAMOLECULAR INTERACTION-MEDIATED DRUG LOADING

Besides the passive encapsulation and covalent conjugation mentioned above, supramolecular interactions can also act as the main force between drugs and carriers, where non-covalent and specific affinity will govern the drug-loading/release behavior. A significant benefit of introducing supramolecular interaction into the drug-loading process is that the formation and the properties of delivery systems could be highly dependent on the drug itself. An additional functional benefit is realized in the ease of the stimuli-responsive drug release [80]. A large variety of therapeutics can be used as supramolecular building blocks. Most chemo-drugs owned incorporate a planar aromatic structure, such as CPT, PTX and so on; a large number of protein therapeutics show specific binding affinity to certain ligands; and other drugs belong to cytotoxic nucleoside analogs, such as floxuridine. All these structures offer strong affinities to govern a reliable supramolecular drug-loading procedure.

Host–guest recognition-mediated drug loading

The delivery and release of drugs, in either formulations or bodies, usually occur in an aqueous environment, where the hydrophobic domain on the drug structure can act as a good guest candidate for host–guest recognition in a drug-loading procedure [81,82]. A typical guest drug has a highly hydrophobic structure, which acts as a proton-donating agent to form multiple hydrogen bonds with the proton-accepting structure of the host molecules [83]. Such a supramolecular complex achieves molecular-level protection from drug degradation or deactivation.

A host–guest interaction with a high association constant provides many opportunities for hydrophobic drug loading. Macrocycles, such as cyclodextran (CD), cucurbituril (CB) and crown ester families of macrocycles, are the most popular host candidates to marry drug guests [84,85]. Besides small hydrophobic drugs, a variety of therapeutics can act as recognition guests directly, including certain proteins with N-terminal aromatic amino acids such as insulin and human growth hormone [86,87]. There is no doubt that, after marring with macrocycle hosts, hydrophobic drugs could achieve enhanced solubility and stability [88,89]. Some published literatures have further demonstrated that the host motif could also contribute a positive effect to permeability through biological membranes, and might be a promising platform for oral administration, topical cream, eye drops and nasal sprays [90–92].

Enzymes are rising stars in disease treatment, as they have a clear mechanism and high therapeutic effect. As a macromolecule with a sophisticated structure, the delivery of enzymatic therapeutics is always of great difficulty. Moreover, two or more enzymes might be in need of cooperation in order to treat a symptom for most diseases [93,94]. Liu and coworkers utilized host–guest affinity to integrate uricase (UOx) and catalase (Cat) dynamically, resulting in a feasible and effective serum uric acid (sUA) control therapy with low systematic toxicity [95]. In their study, CD and adamantine (Ad) worked as a host–guest pair and were conjugated to UOx and Cat through a PEG linker, respectively (Fig. 4a). A multi-enzyme nanocluster with a certain UOx/Cat ratio could be achieved (Fig. 4b). Teamwork could be observed in vitro and in vivo with fast clearance of sUA levels that resulted from the UOx and reduced H2O2-induced abnormal cell apoptosis resulted from the Cat. This work employed a supramolecular engineering strategy for the synergism of two enzymes in a nanoscale space, promising a liable and facile platform for multi-enzyme therapeutic systems.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Cartoon illustration of the synthesis of the host–guest-mediated multi-enzyme delivery system. (a) Synthesis route of host building block PEG-CD and guest building block PEG-AD; (b) formation of multi-enzyme nanocluster through host–guest recognition-driven self-assembly. Adapted with permission from [95].

Base-pairing-mediated drug loading

Nucleoside analog prodrugs, such as clofarabine and floxuridine, have been regarded as types of effective and safe therapeutics for various diseases. An additional benefit from such drugs is that they can work as guest molecules to form moderately strong and directional supramolecular interaction with nucleic acid hosts through the base-pairing principle [96]. A typical nucleoside prodrug loading strategy relies on the rational design of nano-vehicles with engineered DNA strands. Through the supramolecular recognition between engineered DNA strands and nucleoside analogs, both nucleoside analog therapeutics and nucleoside-modified targeted ligands can be integrated on nano-vehicles to obtain multifunctional nanoscale delivery systems [71]. The major reason for using DNA strands instead of a single nucleoside base as supramolecular building blocks is to provide a possibility for tunable binding affinity and a programmable recognition region, which might be crucial to control drug-release profiles.

Wang et al. utilized such a strategy in an opposite way, realizing an all-in-one delivery system combining targeting, therapeutic and detective abilities [97]. In detail, they prepared a nanoparticle using (i) a modified nucleoside analog prodrug 3′,5′-dioleoyl clofarabine (DOC), (ii) DNA strands T30 (30-mer poly dT pligonucleotide) modified aptamer with high targeted affinity and (iii) T30 modified imaging probe Cy5.5 (Fig. 5). Based on the supramolecular affinity between clofarabine with T30, this nanoscale delivery platform was obtained in a simple procedure of mixing three components, achieving multiple functions with active tumor-targeting capacity, in vivo imaging of the tumor site as well as controlled release of clofarabine. A significant strength of the loading affinity can be programmed with regulation of the DNA-strand sequence.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Schematic illustration of (a) the synthesis route and self-assembly of a DOC nanoparticle, and (b) aptamer and imaging agent loading through base-pairing interactions. Adapted with permission from [97].

SUPRAMOLECULAR SELF-DELIVERY SYSTEMS

A recent trend in nanoscale drug-delivery systems is to develop a self-delivery system with anticancer drugs only, which is able to form the nanoscale delivery of drugs to achieve enhanced therapeutic effects without any help from the carrier [98–100]. Most reported self-delivery nanoscale drug-delivery systems are formed through directly conjugating a hydrophobic drug with a hydrophilic one, in order to obtain an amphiphilic structure. Proven by several pieces of pilot research, the concept of the self-delivery of drugs has been well accepted and highly praised as a promising drug-delivery platform. One concern in such a system lies in the potential structural damage to drugs during the chemical reaction, and replacing the chemical bond with a non-covalent interaction may solve such a problem. Certain supramolecular affinities, such as host–guest interaction and multivalent hydrogen bonding, can mediate the fusion of a hydrophobic domain with a hydrophilic one to form supramolecular amphiphile, which is capable to self-assembly into nanoparticles or nanogels. If the drug structure in such supramolecular amphiphiles is made good use of, with one hydrophobic drug and a hydrophilic therapeutic, a supramolecular self-delivery nanodrug-delivery system can be feasibly accessed [101–103]. Hydrophilic chemo-drugs and peptide therapeutics usually allow the hydrophilic domain to cooperate with hydrophobic therapeutics forming nanoscale delivery systems [104]. The interactions between the two drugs should be in a clear and specific way, in order to obtain ordered nano-assembly and therapeutic function (Fig. 6) [105].

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Molecular simulation for the supramolecular interaction and self-assembly of CA and RT in the existence of water. (a) Optimized structure of CA/RT motif with binding affinity calculated using the DFT method; (b) coarse-grained models of CA, RT and water; (c)–(e) DPD simulations of the self-assembly of the CA/RT motif in solution. Adapted with permission from [105].

Wang et al. integrated two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs (clofarabine as the hydrophilic domain and raltitrexed as the hydrophilic domain) together through molecular recognition [106]. A clear interaction manner happened between the two drugs, which was confirmed by 1H NMR and molecular simulation. Such an amphiphilic structure that relies on supramolecular interaction self-assembled into stable nanoparticles in an aqueous system, which exhibited enhanced therapeutic effect in vitro and in vivo.

Deng and coworkers employed a peptide therapeutic donated as a hydrophilic domain cooperating with a hydrophobic chemo-drug through multiple hydrogen bonding and π–π interaction (Fig. 7a) [102]. The resultant nano-assembly responded quickly to an acidic environment such as a tumor microenvironment, which might accelerate the rupture of supramolecular linkage and result in a tumor-specific fast drug release. For in vivo study, a prolonged retention time in plasma as well as enhanced accumulation in a tumor site were observed after intravenous injection, both of which are typical properties for nanoscale systems (Fig. 7b). Based on these phenomena, we can conclude that supramolecular self-delivery systems could be reliable and stable enough for in vivo use after rational design.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Schematic illustration of the construction and function of the supramolecular self-delivery system. (a) The structure of the drug building blocks and the formation of the supramolecular self-delivery system through self-assembly (I), and simulation illustration of supramolecular affinity between two drugs (II). (b) Delivery behavior and therapy mechanism in vivo after intravenous injection. Adapted with permission from [102].

CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE

Supramolecular chemistry has been providing guiding principles for us to understand how nature survives and thrives. What is more, it provides innovative approaches in medicine design. The supramolecular design of drug-delivery system routes from molecule-level building blocks as well as a delicately engineered systems possesses desirable delivery capacity with predictability, precision and limited off-site effects. Additional benefit is realized in the ease of preparation of the supramolecular systems as a ‘mix and match’ procedure. Combining advantages of both supramolecular chemistry and the nano-size effect, better mimicking of bio-functions through simple and effective supramolecular nanoscale drug-delivery systems could be achieved with huge translational benefits.

As supramolecular affinities have made great efforts in nano-carrier design and fancy drug-loading strategies, the supramolecular nanoscale drug-delivery strategy has entered into a new self-delivery era. The disuse of carrier material endows supramolecular drug delivery with feasible formulation and enhanced safety. Additionally, the interaction in such a system mainly happens between two small molecules and the molecular simulation results are usually in high accordance with experimental data. The computational approach to design predicts a novel supramolecular self-delivery system with a high degree of accuracy and productivity in the near future. Compared to conjugated drug-delivery systems, the bio-stability of supramolecular systems is still a concern for clinical use. Innovative solutions for highly stable supramolecular nanodrug-delivery systems are always in demand. A traditional idea for putative stability is mostly based on chemical intuition. However, natural supramolecular systems usually show proper stability and can give us inspiration. On the one hand, we might mimic nature to develop stable supramolecular systems with multiple levels of structural design. In the other, we are looking forward to more computational simulation research based on natural systems to inspire new supramolecular systems.

Precision medicine, aimed at patient-specific medical care, has been recently a hot topic in the pursuit of safe and effective disease treatment or prevention [107]. A novel drug-delivery strategy may offer useful solutions in the content of precision medicine. We therefore believe that supramolecular designs in nanoscale drug delivery, with easy construction, enhanced therapeutic effect and customized treatment options, should provide possibilities and excitement.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Brunsveld L, Folmer BJB, Meijer EWet al.. Supramolecular polymers. Chem Rev 2001; 101: 4071–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zhou J, Li J, Du XWet al.. Supramolecular biofunctional materials. Biomaterials 2017; 129: 1–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Riess B, Boekhoven J. Applications of dissipative supramolecular materials with a tunable lifetime. ChemNanoMat 2018; 4: 710–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wei PF, Yan XZ, Huang FH. Supramolecular polymers constructed by orthogonal self-assembly based on host–guest and metal-ligand interactions. Chem Soc Rev 2015; 44: 815–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dong R, Pang Y, Su Yet al.. Supramolecular hydrogels: synthesis, properties and their biomedical applications. Biomater Sci 2015; 3: 937–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Yu G, Jie K, Huang F. Supramolecular amphiphiles based on host–guest molecular recognition motifs. Chem Rev 2015; 115: 7240–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Delbianco M, Bharate P, Varela-Aramburu Set al.. Carbohydrates in supramolecular chemistry. Chem Rev 2016; 116: 1693–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Aida T, Meijer EW, Stupp SI. Functional supramolecular polymers. Science 2012; 335: 813–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dong R, Zhou Y, Huang Xet al.. Functional supramolecular polymers for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 2015; 27: 498–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chen JW, Leung FKC, Stuart MCAet al.. Artificial muscle-like function from hierarchical supramolecular assembly of photoresponsive molecular motors. Nat Chem 2018; 10: 132–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Shigemitsu H, Fujisaku T, Tanaka Wet al.. An adaptive supramolecular hydrogel comprising self-sorting double nanofibre networks. Nat Nanotech 2018; 13: 165–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kang JC, Kumar V, Yang Det al.. Cyclodextrin complexation: influence on the solubility, stability, and cytotoxicity of camptothecin, an antineoplastic agent. Eur J Pharm Sci 2002; 15: 163–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Davis ME, Brewster ME. Cyclodextrin-based pharmaceutics: past, present and future. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004; 3: 1023–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jin X, Sun P, Tong Get al.. Star polymer-based unimolecular micelles and their application in bio-imaging and diagnosis. Biomaterials 2018; 178: 738–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ma Y, Liu H, Mou Qet al.. Floxuridine-containing nucleic acid nanogels for anticancer drug delivery. Nanoscale 2018; 10: 8367–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Tang J, Liu Y, Zhu Bet al.. Preparation of paclitaxel/chitosan co-assembled core-shell nanofibers for drug-eluting stent. Appl Surf Sci 2017; 393: 299–308. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Li X, Lee S, Yoon J. Supramolecular photosensitizers rejuvenate photodynamic therapy. Chem Soc Rev 2018; 47: 1174–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Felip-Leon C, Cejudo-Marin R, Peris Met al.. Sizing down a supramolecular gel into micro- and nanoparticles. Langmuir 2017; 33: 10322–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ji X-F, Wang P, Wang Het al.. A fluorescent supramolecular crosslinked polymer gel formed by crown ether based host-guest interactions and aggregation induced emission. Chin J Polym Sci 2015; 33: 890–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cheng M-J, Zhang Q, Shi F. Macroscopic supramolecular assembly and its applications. Chin J Polym Sci 2018; 36: 306–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Su H, Wang Y, Anderson CFet al.. Recent progress in exploiting small molecule peptides as supramolecular hydrogelators. Chin J Polym Sci 2017; 35: 1194–211. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Luan Y-G, Zhang X-A, Jiang S-Let al.. Self-healing supramolecular polymer composites by hydrogen bonding interactions between hyperbranched polymer and graphene oxide. Chin J Polym Sci 2018; 36: 584–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wang Z, Liao S, Wang Y. Supramolecular polymer emulsifiers for one-step complex emulsions. Chin J Polym Sci 2018; 36: 288–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wei S, Zhou X-R, Huang Zet al.. Hydrogen sulfide induced supramolecular self-assembly in living cells. Chem Commun 2018; 54: 9051–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Webber MJ, Appel EA, Meijer EWet al.. Supramolecular biomaterials. Nat Mater 2016; 15: 13–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Gu HB, Mu SD, Qiu GRet al.. Redox-stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems with supramolecular ferrocenyl-containing polymers for controlled release. Coord Chem Rev 2018; 364: 51–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. He X-P, Tian H. Lightening up membrane receptors with fluorescent molecular probes and supramolecular materials. Chem 2018; 4: 246–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sun M, Bai R, Yang Xet al.. Hydrogel interferometry for ultrasensitive and highly selective chemical detection. Adv Mater 2018; 30: 1804916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Wei X, Dong R, Wang Det al.. Supramolecular fluorescent nanoparticles constructed via multiple non-covalent interactions for the detection of hydrogen peroxide in cancer cells. Chem Eur J 2015; 21: 11427–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Feng ZQQ, Zhang TF, Wang HMet al.. Supramolecular catalysis and dynamic assemblies for medicine. Chem Soc Rev 2017; 46: 6470–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chen P, Mondal JH, Zhou Yet al.. Construction of a neutral linear supramolecular polymer via orthogonal donor-acceptor interactions and pillar 5 arene-based molecular recognition. Polym Chem 2016; 7: 5221–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Dong S, Gao L, Li Jet al.. Photo-responsive linear and cross-linked supramolecular polymers based on host–guest interactions. Polym Chem 2013; 4: 3968–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang H, Wang P, Xing Het al.. A multistimuli-responsive supramolecular polymer constructed by crown ether-based molecular recognition and disulfide bond connection. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 2015; 53: 2079–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wang Q, Cheng M, Jiang J-Let al.. Modulating the properties of quadruple hydrogen bonded supramolecular polymers by photo-cross-linking between the coumarin moieties. Chin Chem Lett 2017; 28: 793–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zhang Z, Luo Y, Chen Jet al.. Formation of linear supramolecular polymers that is driven by C-H center dot center dot center dot pi interactions in solution and in the solid state. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011; 50: 1397–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zou H, Yuan W, Lu Yet al.. UV light- and thermo-responsive supramolecular aggregates with tunable morphologies from the inclusion complexation of dendritic/linear polymers. Chem Commun 2017; 53: 2463–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Galeazzi S, Hermans TM, Paolino Met al.. Multivalent supramolecular dendrimer-based drugs. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11: 182–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Gittins PJ, Twyman LJ. Dendrimers and supramolecular chemistry. Supramol Chem 2003; 15: 5–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Fang R, Liu Y, Wang Zet al.. Water-soluble supramolecular hyperbranched polymers based on host-enhanced pi-pi interaction. Polym Chem 2013; 4: 900–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Li H, Fan X, Tian Wet al.. A supramolecular hyperbranched polymer based on molecular recognition between benzo-21-crown-7 and secondary ammonium salt. Chem Commun 2014; 50: 14666–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Qi M, Duan S, Yu Bet al.. PGMA-based supramolecular hyperbranched polycations for gene delivery. Polym Chem 2016; 7: 4334–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Tian W, Li X, Wang J. Supramolecular hyperbranched polymers. Chem Commun 2017; 53: 2531–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Wang X, Yang Y, Fan Let al.. POSS-embedded supramolecular hyperbranched polymers constructed from a 1 → 7 branching monomer with controllable morphology transitions. Sci China Chem 2018; 61: 311–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Yang H, Ma Z, Wang Zet al.. Fabricating covalently attached hyperbranched polymers by combining photochemistry with supramolecular polymerization. Polym Chem 2014; 5: 1471–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Yang L, Guo Y, Lei Z. Synthesis of a smart Janus-like supramolecular polymer based on the host–guest chemistry and its self-assembly. J Mater Chem A 2015; 3: 17098–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Catrouillet S, Fonteneau C, Bouteiller Let al.. Competition between steric hindrance and hydrogen bonding in the formation of supramolecular bottle brush polymers. Macromolecules 2013; 46: 7911–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Gao Z, Chen M, Hu Yet al.. Tunable assembly and disassembly of responsive supramolecular polymer brushes. Polym Chem 2017; 8: 2764–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Loh XJ, del Barrio J, Toh PPCet al.. Triply triggered doxorubicin release from supramolecular nanocontainers. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13: 84–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Gadwal I, De S, Stuparu MCet al.. Effect of precursor chemical composition on the formation and stability of G-quadruplex core supramolecular star polymers. Polym Chem 2012; 3: 2615–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hou Z, Dehaen W, Lyskawa Jet al.. A supramolecular miktoarm star polymer based on porphyrin metal complexation in water. Chem Commun 2017; 53: 8423–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Huang F, Nagvekar DS, Slebodnick Cet al.. A supramolecular triarm star polymer from a homotritopic tris(crown ether) host and a complementary monotopic paraquat-terminated polystyrene guest by a supramolecular coupling method. J Am Chem Soc 2005; 127: 484–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Schmidt BVKJ, Hetzer M, Ritter Het al.. Miktoarm star polymers via cyclodextrin-driven supramolecular self-assembly. Polym Chem 2012; 3: 3064–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Schmidt BVKJ, Kugele D, von Irmer Jet al.. Dual-gated supramolecular star polymers in aqueous solution. Macromolecules 2017; 50: 2375–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Huan X, Wang D, Dong Ret al.. Supramolecular ABC miktoarm star terpolymer based on host–guest inclusion complexation. Macromolecules 2012; 45: 5941–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Dam HH, Caruso F. Construction and degradation of polyrotaxane multilayers. Adv Mater 2011; 23: 3026–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Tardy BL, Dam HH, Kamphuis MMJet al.. Self-assembled stimuli-responsive polyrotaxane core–shell particles. Biomacromolecules 2014; 15: 53–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Zhao F, Yin H, Li J. Supramolecular self-assembly forming a multifunctional synergistic system for targeted co-delivery of gene and drug. Biomaterials 2014; 35: 1050–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Cao H, Chen C, Xie Det al.. A hyperbranched amphiphilic acetal polymer for pH-sensitive drug delivery. Polym Chem 2018; 9: 169–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Loh XJ, Tsai M-H, Barrio JDet al.. Triggered insulin release studies of triply responsive supramolecular micelles. Polym Chem 2012; 3: 3180–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Tao Y, Ju E, Ren Jet al.. Polypyrrole nanoparticles as promising enzyme mimics for sensitive hydrogen peroxide detection. Chem Commun 2014; 50: 3030–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Dankers PYW, Hermans TM, Baughman TWet al.. Hierarchical formation of supramolecular transient networks in water: a modular injectable delivery system. Adv Mater 2012; 24: 2703–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Yasen W, Dong R, Zhou Let al.. Supramolecular block copolymers for gene delivery: enhancement of transfection efficiency by charge regulation. Chem Commun 2017; 53: 12782–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Dong R, Su Y, Yu Set al.. A redox-responsive cationic supramolecular polymer constructed from small molecules as a promising gene vector. Chem Commun 2013; 49: 9845–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Dong R, Chen H, Wang Det al.. Supramolecular fluorescent nanoparticles for targeted cancer imaging. ACS Macro Lett 2012; 1: 1208–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Mou Q, Ma Y, Jin Xet al.. Designing hyperbranched polymers for gene delivery. Mol Syst Des Eng 2016; 1: 25–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Schmidt BVKJ, Barner-Kowollik C. Dynamic macromolecular material design-the versatility of cyclodextrin-based host-guest chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 2017; 56: 8350–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Yasen W, Dong R, Zhou Let al.. Synthesis of a cationic supramolecular block copolymer with covalent and noncovalent polymer clocks for gene delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017; 9: 9006–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Cheetham AG, Zhang P, Lin Y-Aet al.. Supramolecular nanostructures formed by anticancer drug assembly. J Am Chem Soc 2013; 135: 2907–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Kang M, Chakraborty K, Loverde SM. Molecular dynamics simulations of supramolecular anticancer nanotubes. J Chem Inf Model 2018; 58: 1164–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Talloj SK, Cheng B, Weng JPet al.. Glucosamine-based supramolecular nanotubes for human mesenchymal cell therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018; 10: 15079–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Yu ZL, Erbas A, Tantakitti Fet al.. Co-assembly of peptide amphiphiles and lipids into supramolecular nanostructures driven by anion-pi interactions. J Am Chem Soc 2017; 139: 7823–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Stupp SI, Palmer LC. Supramolecular chemistry and self-assembly in organic materials design. Chem Mater 2014; 26: 507–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Ashwanikumar N, Plaut JS, Mostofian Bet al.. Supramolecular self assembly of nanodrill-like structures for intracellular delivery. J Control Release 2018; 282: 76–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Wang N, Jin X, Guo Det al.. Iron chelation nanoparticles with delayed saturation as an effective therapy for Parkinson disease. Biomacromolecules 2017; 18: 461–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Jiang Y, Shi ML, Liu Yet al.. Aptamer/AuNP biosensor for colorimetric profiling of exosomal proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed 2017; 56: 11916–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Fu T, Lyu YF, Liu Het al.. DNA-based dynamic reaction networks. Trends Biochem Sci 2018; 43: 547–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Wang D, Tu C, Su Yet al.. Supramolecularly engineered phospholipids constructed by nucleobase molecular recognition: upgraded generation of phospholipids for drug delivery. Chem Sci 2015; 6: 3775–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Wu D, Li Y, Shen Jet al.. Supramolecular chemotherapeutic drug constructed from pillararene-based supramolecular amphiphile. Chem Commun 2018; 54: 8198–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Zhou D, Gao Y, A Set al.. Anticancer drug disulfiram for in situ RAFT polymerization: controlled polymerization, multifacet self-assembly, and efficient drug delivery. ACS Macro Lett 2016; 5: 1266–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Boekhoven J, Stupp SI. 25th anniversary article: supramolecular materials for regenerative medicine. Adv Mater 2014; 26: 1642–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Krieg E, Bastings MMC, Besenius Pet al.. Supramolecular polymers in aqueous media. Chem Rev 2016; 116: 2414–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Mou Q, Ma Y, Jin Xet al.. Host–guest binding motifs based on hyperbranched polymers. Chem Commun 2016; 52: 11728–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Hao Q, Chen Y, Huang Zet al.. Supramolecular chemotherapy: carboxylated pillar[6]arene for decreasing cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin to normal cells and improving its anticancer bioactivity against colorectal cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018; 10: 5365–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Miyauchi M, Takashima Y, Yamaguchi Het al.. Chiral supramolecular polymers formed by host–guest interactions. J Am Chem Soc 2005; 127: 2984–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Jiang Y, Pan XS, Chang Jet al.. Supramolecularly engineered circular bivalent aptamer for enhanced functional protein delivery. J Am Chem Soc 2018; 140: 6780–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Chinai JM, Taylor AB, Ryno LMet al.. Molecular recognition of insulin by a synthetic receptor. J Am Chem Soc 2011; 133: 8810–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Li W, Bockus AT, Vinciguerra Bet al.. Predictive recognition of native proteins by cucurbit[7]uril in a complex mixture. Chem Commun 2016; 52: 8537–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Chen H, Khemtong C, Yang Xet al.. Nanonization strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Drug Discov Today 2011; 16: 354–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Yu G, Yu W, Mao Zet al.. A pillararene-based ternary drug-delivery system with photocontrolled anticancer drug release. Small 2015; 11: 919–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Loftsson T, Brewster ME. Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins: effects on drug permeation through biological membranes. J Pharm Pharmacol 2011; 63: 1119–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Tiwari G, Tiwari R, Rai A. Cyclodextrins in delivery systems: applications. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2010; 2: 72–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Hirayama F, Uekama K. Cyclodextrin-based controlled drug release system. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1999; 36: 125–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Liu Y, Du J, Yan Met al.. Biomimetic enzyme nanocomplexes and their use as antidotes and preventive measures for alcohol intoxication. Nat Nanotech 2013; 8: 187–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Goor O, Hendrikse SIS, Dankers PYWet al.. From supramolecular polymers to multi-component biomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 2017; 46: 6621–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Zhang Z, Gu Y, Liu Qet al.. Spatial confined synergistic enzymes with enhanced uricolytic performance and reduced toxicity for effective gout treatment. Small 2018; 14: 1801865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Del Grosso E, Amodio A, Ragazzon Get al.. Dissipative synthetic DNA-based receptors for the transient loading and release of molecular cargo. Angew Chem Int Ed 2018; 57: 10489–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Wang D, Liu B, Ma Yet al.. A molecular recognition approach to synthesize nucleoside analogue based multifunctional nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy. J Am Chem Soc 2017; 139: 14021–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Huang P, Wang D, Su Yet al.. Combination of small molecule prodrug and nanodrug delivery: amphiphilic drug-drug conjugate for cancer therapy. J Am Chem Soc 2014; 136: 11748–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Aryal S, Hu C-MJ, Zhang L. Combinatorial drug conjugation enables nanoparticle dual-drug delivery. Small 2010; 6: 1442–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Kasai H, Murakami T, Ikuta Yet al.. Creation of pure nanodrugs and their anticancer properties. Angew Chem Int Ed 2012; 51: 10315–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Xu S, Zhu X, Huang Wet al.. Supramolecular cisplatin-vorinostat nanodrug for overcoming drug resistance in cancer synergistic therapy. J Control Release 2017; 266: 36–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Zhang Z, Shi L, Wu Cet al.. Construction of a supramolecular drug-drug delivery system for non-small-cell lung cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017; 9: 29505–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Ge S, Deng H, Su Yet al.. Emission enhancement of GFP chromophore in aggregated state via combination of self-restricted effect and supramolecular host–guest complexation. RSC Adv 2017; 7: 17980–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Li X, Yu S, Lee Det al.. Facile supramolecular approach to nucleic-acid-driven activatable nanotheranostics that overcome drawbacks of photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano 2018; 12: 681–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Yu G, Zhao X, Zhou Jet al.. Supramolecular polymer-based nanomedicine: high therapeutic performance and negligible long-term immunotoxicity. J Am Chem Soc 2018; 140: 8005–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Wang DL, Yu CY, Xu Let al.. Nucleoside analogue-based supramolecular nanodrugs driven by molecular recognition for synergistic cancer therapy. J Am Chem Soc 2018; 140: 8797–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Webber MJ, Langer R. Drug delivery by supramolecular design. Chem Soc Rev 2017; 46: 6600–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES