Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Orthod. 2021 May 19;27(2):78–86. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2021.05.004

Decision Support Systems in Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis: A review of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Applications

Jonas Bianchi 1, Antonio Ruellas 2, Juan Carlos Prieto 3, Tengfei Li 4, Reza Soroushmehr 5, Kayvan Najarian 6, Jonathan Gryak 7, Romain Deleat-Besson 8, Celia Le 9, Marilia Yatabe 10, Marcela Gurgel 11, Najla Al Turkestani 12, Beatriz Paniagua 13, Lucia Cevidanes 14
PMCID: PMC8294157  NIHMSID: NIHMS1706387  PMID: 34305383

Abstract

With the exponential growth of computational systems and increased patient data acquisition, dental research faces new challenges to manage a large quantity of information. For this reason, data science approaches are needed for the integrative diagnosis of multifactorial diseases, such as Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) Osteoarthritis (OA). The Data science spectrum includes data capture/acquisition, data processing with optimized web-based storage and management, data analytics involving in-depth statistical analysis, machine learning (ML) approaches, and data communication. Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role in this process. It consists of developing computational systems that can perform human intelligence tasks, such as disease diagnosis, using many features to help in the decision-making support. Patient's clinical parameters, imaging exams, and molecular data are used as the input in cross-validation tasks, and human annotation/diagnosis is also used as the gold standard to train computational learning models and automatic disease classifiers. This paper aims to review and describe AI and ML techniques to diagnose TMJ OA and data science approaches for imaging processing. We used a web-based system for multi-center data communication, algorithms integration, statistics deployment, and process the computational machine learning models. We successfully show AI and data-science applications using patients' data to improve the TMJ OA diagnosis decision-making towards personalized medicine.

INTRODUCTION

A fundamental question in medical and dental research is how to improve the diagnosis of complex diseases. In this context, decision-support systems have been developed to help clinicians to do a correct diagnosis and treatment plan, allowing an improved decision-making process. Decision-support systems involve different approaches, including universal guidelines for specific diseases, such as the DC/TMD1 for the temporomandibular disorders, software containing different algorithms, such as image-guided applications, and image exams such as the cone-beam computed tomography for visualization and imaging processing2. More recently, due to the large volume of information, the decision-support systems are being integrated into different statistical approaches where machines can now learn with human annotations, predict diseases and provide additional diagnostic tools for a personalized treatment3-7.

For this reason, data science approaches, including artificial intelligence (AI) with machine learning (ML), are needed to improve statistical models and deployment of the support-system in web-systems, available to the public8,9. In dentistry, temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis is an example of a disease with multifactorial etiology that requires a large number of exams such as clinical assessment of disease condition, image exams such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and magnetic resonance (MRI), and biological markers10-13. All those exams generate information and features for each patient, and ML approaches can integrate and combine those creating prediction models with better accuracy to diagnose the disease rather than individual biomarker14.

Artificial intelligence was first defined by a group of computer scientists back in 1956 at the Dartmouth Conferences15. It has been implemented in machines (computers) to solve human problems through different learning algorithms. There are two main categories of machine learning methods called: supervised and unsupervised. The first is based on the prediction of a specific condition, where the machine knows the output in advance, i.e., the presence or absence of TMJ-OA in the data. In the second, there are no outputs to predict; however, the learning is based on trying to find data patterns that can be grouped and separate (classify) the data based on those parameters16,17. For instance, in the TMJ-OA, the mandibular condyle shape is an important feature to determine if the disease is present or absent, Tubau et al.18, tested an unsupervised machine learning approach and compared it with nine supervised methods to classify different clinical phenotypes of TMJ-OA using statistical shape modeling properties

Artificial intelligence can also be applied in many fields such as image processing, data and features extraction, text and picture recognition, automated tasks, and others15,19,20. There are many algorithms and methods to perform different tasks using machine learning, but we will focus on Orthodontics applications in this manuscript. A question that remains unclear is which ML algorithm should be used in a specific project, i.e., for image processing data, standardization is essential to provide accurate results. Image segmentation is the first step towards this goal. To perform reliable segmentation on CBCT images, the researcher can use automated software that lacks precision and perform semi-automated segmentation based on human interaction21 that adds more precision; however, it demands a large amount of time. For this goal, machine learning can help automatize using training sets of images, pre-segmented (training data) by a user to perform automatic segmentation on the testing data22-24.

To assess the statistical models' performance in ML approaches, it is necessary to use methods such as cross-validation. They are applied to the dataset to test the prediction models' effectiveness, feature selection, and other tasks. To perform the CV, is it necessary to have divided the sample into two main categories: 1) Training Set (used for training the learning algorithm) and 2) Testing Set - used for testing and validating the different ML models25-31.

In general, this century is being changed by this revolution on health care and personalized medicine, requiring holistic models based on the patients' characteristics and needs32-35. For this reason, in this paper, we aimed to describe and review general aspects of artificial intelligence and machine learning applied in Orthodontics, specifically towards the decision-support system for a precise and personalized diagnosis and treatment planning in the Temporomandibular Joint region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This section contains the approaches applied to data science and artificial intelligence.

Data acquisition and standardization.

An optimized data-science approach that utilizes AI and ML usually require a large number of data. One of the challenges is to have those data in a standardized manner. Samples that lack standardization of the training information can lead to a not balanced learning model due to the inherent features heterogeneity. For instance, there are several methodologies in the TMJ research related to image acquisition, such as medical computed tomography, CBCT, magnetic resonance image, panoramic image, etc36-38. However, suppose a particular exam is chosen, such as the CBCT images. In that case, there is heterogeneity also among the different types of equipment (diverse fabricants) and spatial resolution configuration (voxel size, field of view, and others). To be able to create learning models for disease classification, such as the TMJ OA, those "small differences" can cause bias in the analysis. This happens mainly due to the feature heterogeneity present within the images, previously to any image processing technique for extracting the information from that gray-level based scans39-41. This scenario is commonly seen in the clinician routine. Still, the human mind is trained to perform diagnosis with fewer details than an automatic system, which extracts thousands of data42,43 from a single scan, requiring standardization within the groups. To contour that challenge, image techniques may be applied to normalize the images, and among those, the filtering algorithms and CBCT grayscale normalization are widely used44,45. Fig. 1 shows an example of image-pre processing in a TMJ condyle after applying three different Gaussian filters (sigma = 0.1 and 0.3) using the software 3D-Slicer2. The baseline population characteristics need to be drawn for each project before the data collection, so the features to be evaluated do not influence the ML model.

Fig. 1 -.

Fig. 1 -

Data capture and standardization, an example of a CBCT with a voxel size of 0.08 mm3 and different filters applied. A) TMJ with the original resolution and filters. B) The same CBCT with a Gaussian filter application (0.1 sigma value). C) The same CBCT with a Gaussian filter application (0.3 sigma value).

Data extraction and assessment.

This step of the data science approach and support systems focuses on extracting information from different sources to be used in the ML models as a set of features. In the TMJ OA, there are three main categories of variables used for helping in the diagnosis of the disease: clinical, imaging, and molecular markers46. The clinical sources are mainly dependent on the human operator, and they include various signals and symptoms1, for the molecular markers are less used in the clinical routine, and the imaging markers are essential for the AI models. The main reason is that using algorithms for data extraction such as radiomics extraction algorithms and methods47, there is an increase in the information obtained from the sample, and that information was before not visible to the naked eye, but machine learning models can group those markers into different categories to classify in other groups of patients based on radiomics similarity. Also, the mandibular condyle shape characteristics is another feature that can be extracted from the CBCT images, being a good indicator of the disease status based on the mesh arrangement48,49.

Data management and storage: Web-systems and computational processing.

It is well known that state of the art for machine learning algorithms performance is mostly driven by the number of samples used for training. Ideally, standardized protocols for data collection in each clinical site should be implemented to increase sample size without compromising data homogeneity. For having an efficient AI system, there is a need to deploy the data in an efficient computation system, capable of communication with different centers and users and at the same time capable of having ML algorithm and statistical methods implementation. This study presents a web-system developed by our group, called: "Data storage computation and integration – DSCI"- to store and share deidentified data50 (Fig. 2). It aims to collaborate across medical centers, providing data transfer, sharing, and processing. Additional functionalities include ML algorithms implementations.

Fig. 2 -.

Fig. 2 -

Web-system for data management, storage, and processing. A) CBCT image with standard resolution and large field of view (FOV). B) CBCT image of a TMJ condyle with high resolution and small FOV. C) Digital dental model. D) Illustration of biomolecular information storage. E) Illustration of clinical information storage.

Data processing: image processing, classification, and 3D segmentation (labeling).

Data processing can be included in a web-system and/or in a computer using traditional software for data and image processing. This step's main objective is to process the information extracted from the sample and execute additional necessary tasks. In the TMJ – OA, the CBCT exam requires a manual segmentation of the mandibular condyle to better visualization and 3D surface diagnosis. For this, the use of open-source software such as the ITK-SNAP51 and 3D Slicer52 can be used. This step is essential for the AI because it created the baseline sample and the training set (gold standard) for machine learning validations. Also, a common term, known as data mining refers to discovering patterns in data sets involving machine learning methods, statistics, and database systems for features extraction53 and can also be deployed in the AI to provide a larger number of features; however, caution should be taken due to the possibility of overfitting9 the ML models due to possible correlations among the features (Fig.3).

Fig. 3 –

Fig. 3 –

Biomarkers selection to avoid overfitting of the ML models.

Artificial Intelligence: Statistical analysis, cross-validation, and machine learning models.

The AI is applied as an integrative part of a decision support system. It incorporates data science approaches using different machine learning algorithms and statistical analysis to perform specific tasks, such as classifying a patient as having or not having TMJ OA14, segmenting CBCT images automatically24, and features selection19,54. To perform those tasks, the applications use algorithms based on data quality enhancement, active deep learning, active contour modeling, and typical algorithms for ML are random forest, support vector machines, light GBM, XGboost, UNet, ResNet, and many others55-59. The decision-making process aims to use AI and ML to test a large number of machine learning algorithms to see which one has better performance in a determined task. To determine how accurately a predictive model is, cross-validation (CV) is necessary. They are mainly divided into two subtypes: K-fold cross-validation and Leave-p-out cross-validation; the CV also can be used as well to features selection25,60.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This section results from data science approaches and AI presented, including image processing steps, data standardization, statistical analysis, and 3D visualization for Temporomandibular joint applications and TMJ OA. For this goal, our team24 has developed an automatized image processing algorithm called: TMJSeg in a web-system to segment in 3D the CBCT images and convert them to a surface volume (Fig. 4). This provides a mandibular condyle model that can be used to assess the shape variability in a population.

Fig. 4 –

Fig. 4 –

Automatic TMJ condyle 3D segmentation - Image processing steps involved in the algorithm.

We also applied the AI using ML to detect the variability in condyles' surface with TMJ OA and health. In the study published by Ribera et al.18, our group demonstrated the ShapeVariationAnalyzer application and accuracy of a deep machine learning model to classify the condyles in different categories, according to their shape condition. Experient clinicians labeled the learning set using the degree of skeletal degeneration at the mandibular condyles' surface. The ML algorithms extracted mesh features such as Normal vector, distances, curvatures, shape index, curvedness, position, and heat kernel signatures to classify the mandibular condyles based on the shape. As a result, we obtained a maximum accuracy during the training of 92% for our ML deployed. Fig. 5 shows an illustration of the different degrees of degenerations among the sample. Other authors have evaluated mandibular condyles' shape using traditional imaging methods, such as the presence or absence of radiographic findings using the CBCT slices61. However, in images with high resolution, this subjective interpretation may be biased by the lack of a gold standard for comparisons of the thin line between health and disease in the aging process of the TMJ joints. For this reason, AI methods and computational approaches using different software can be used for better assessment and more quantitative feature extraction. A recent paper from our group62 showed that it is possible to extract radiomics features from the trabecular bone using CBCT with high resolution of mandibular condyles and differentiate between control and disease in patients with initial stages of TMJ OA.

Fig. 5 –

Fig. 5 –

TMJ condyles used in the previous study for classification of the clinicians' training set. Degeneration 0 means that the condyle has little change to its shape than the control, and degeneration 5 is the highest disproportion compared to the healthy condyle.

For the AI approaches and ML implementation, feature extraction is needed to perform the models' cross-validation and training. The TMJ - OA is a multifactorial disease, with multisource biomarkers such as clinical variables, proteins assessment, and imaging markers that may be responsible for disease progression. Figures 3 and 5 show a summary of key features that can be extracted from mandibular condyles prior to the AI implementation or concomitantly when the ML models are used to select features and weight those features.

Also, in a recent study, our group showed the importance of integrating those variables to detect the TMJ OA in early stages14 using artificial intelligence. In Fig. 7, we illustrate the diagnosis of TMJ OA based on single features and outline the limitations of the current procedures. We have demonstrated that the integration of multisource biomarkers using ML models is able to predict the TMJ OA in its initial stages with an accuracy of 0.823. We found that not only the single features are essential to the AI's decision process, but also the interaction between them has a higher value for our tested prediction machine learning models.

Fig. 7 -.

Fig. 7 -

Spectrum of decision support systems in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

This paper presented an overview of data science, artificial intelligence, and machine learning approaches used in decision support systems in the temporomandibular joint research area. In conclusion, clinicians can benefit from the large amount of data obtained in the last years, using trained ML models to integrate those features, helping in the clinical decision making, especially in complex diseases with multifactorial etiology, such as the TMJ OA. This will support the clinician to do an early diagnosis and personalized treatment with higher predictability.

Fig. 6 –

Fig. 6 –

Multisource Features selection and extraction to be applied in AI and ML models training.

Acknowledgments

Grant Support: NIDCR R01DE024450 and AAOF 2020 B.F. Dewel Memorial Biomedical Research

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schiffman E et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J. oral facial pain headache 28, 6–27 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bianchi J et al. 3D Slicer Craniomaxillofacial Modules Support Patient-Specific Decision-Making for Personalized Healthcare in Dental Research. Multimodal Learn. Clin. Decis. Support Clin. image-based Proced 10th Int. Work. ML-CDS 2020, 9th Int. Work. CLIP 2020, held conjunction with MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru, Oct. 4-8, … 12445, 44–53 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mendonça EA Clinical Decision Support Systems: Perspectives in Dentistry. J. Dent. Educ 68, 589–597 (2004). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brickley MR, Shepherd JP & Armstrong RA Neural networks: A new technique for development of decision support systems in dentistry. J. Dent 26, 305–309 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brahim A et al. A decision support tool for early detection of knee OsteoArthritis using X-ray imaging and machine learning: Data from the OsteoArthritis Initiative. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph 73, 11–18 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Karhade AV, Schwab JH & Bedair HS Development of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Sustained Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 34, 2272–2277.e1 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fontana MA, Lyman S, Sarker GK, Padgett DE & MacLean CH Can machine learning algorithms predict which patients will achieve minimally clinically important differences from total joint arthroplasty? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res 477, 1267–1279 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thrall JH et al. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiology: Opportunities, Challenges, Pitfalls, and Criteria for Success. J. Am. Coll. Radiol 15, 504–508 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cohen S The basics of machine learning: strategies and techniques. Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Pathology (Elsevier Inc., 2021). doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-67538-3.00002-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lotz M et al. Value of biomarkers in osteoarthritis: Current status and perspectives. Postgrad. Med. J 90, 171–178 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hodges DC Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis in a British Skeletal Population. (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Johnson VL, App B, Ex S, Sc S & Hunter DJ Osteoarthritis : What Does Imaging Tell Us about Its Etiology ? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 16, 410–419 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Souza RF, Lovato da Silva CH, Nasser M, Fedorowicz Z & Al-Muharraqi M. a. Interventions for the management of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Cochrane database Syst. Rev 4, CD007261 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bianchi J et al. Osteoarthritis of the Temporomandibular Joint can be diagnosed earlier using biomarkers and machine learning. Sci. Rep 10, 8012 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Muehlhauser L & Salamon A Intelligence Explosion: Evidence and Import. in Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment (eds. Eden AH, Moor JH, Søraker JH & Steinhart E) 15–42 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32560-1_2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deo RC Machine learning in medicine. Circulation 132, 1920–1930 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu KH, Beam AL & Kohane IS Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat. Biomed. Eng 2, 719–731 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tubau N et al. Shape variation analyzer: a classifier for temporomandibular joint damaged by osteoarthritis. 1095021, 73 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.CORBELLA S, SRINIVAS S & CABITZA F Applications of Deep Learning in Dentistry. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol 00, (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stetter BJ, Krafft FC, Ringhof S, Stein T & Sell S A Machine Learning and Wearable Sensor Based Approach to Estimate External Knee Flexion and Adduction Moments During Various Locomotion Tasks. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol 8, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ibanez L, Schroeder W, Ng L & Cates J The ITK Software Guide. ITK Softw. Guid Second, 804 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang K, Li J, Ma R & Li G An End-to-End Segmentation Network for the Temporomandibular Joints CBCT Image based on 3D U-Net. 664–668 (2020). doi: 10.1109/cisp-bmei51763.2020.9263566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fan Y et al. Marker-based watershed transform method for fully automatic mandibular segmentation from cBct images. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 48, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brosset S et al. 3D Auto-Segmentation of Mandibular Condyles. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Annu. Int. Conf. 2020, 1270–1273 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Browne MW Cross-validation methods. J. Math. Psychol 44, 108–132 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chang GH et al. Assessment of knee pain from MR imaging using a convolutional Siamese network. Eur. Radiol (2020). doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06658-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nelson AE et al. A machine learning approach to knee osteoarthritis phenotyping: data from the FNIH Biomarkers Consortium. Osteoarthr. Cartil 27, 994–1001 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jamshidi A, Pelletier JP & Martel-Pelletier J Machine-learning-based patient-specific prediction models for knee osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol 15, 49–60 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haeberle HS et al. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty: A Review. J. Arthroplasty 34, 2201–2203 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Szymczak S et al. Machine learning in genome-wide association studies. Genet. Epidemiol 33, 51–57 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gao C et al. Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson ’ s Disease. 1–21 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24783-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mullins IM et al. Data mining and clinical data repositories: Insights from a 667,000 patient data set. Comput. Biol. Med 36, 1351–1377 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cai L & Zhu Y The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. (2015). doi: 10.5334/dsj-2015-002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Alyass A, Turcotte M & Meyre D From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: Challenges and opportunities. BMC Med. Genomics 8, 1–12 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Raghupathi W & Raghupathi V Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Heal. Inf. Sci. Syst 2, 3 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wadhwa S & Kapila S TMJ disorders: future innovations in diagnostics and therapeutics. J. Dent. Educ 72, 930–47 (2008). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bay-Jensen AC et al. Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: Soluble biomarkers and the BIPED criteria. Osteoarthr. Cartil 24, 9–20 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ma RH, Yin S & Li G The detection accuracy of cone beam CT for osseous defects of the temporomandibular joint: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep 6, 1–8 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pauwels R et al. A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: Balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 43, (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhao B, Tan Y, Tsai WY, Schwartz LH & Lu L Exploring Variability in CT Characterization of Tumors: A Preliminary Phantom Study. Transl. Oncol 7, 88–93 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pauwels R et al. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol 114, 127–135 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lambin P et al. Radiomics: The bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol 14, 749–762 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shafiq-Ul-Hassan M et al. Voxel size and gray level normalization of CT radiomic features in lung cancer. Sci. Rep 8, 1–9 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang H, Kong V, Huang K & Jin JY Correction of Bowtie-Filter Normalization and Crescent Artifacts for a Clinical CBCT System. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat 16, 81–91 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen L, Liang X, Shen C, Jiang S & Wang J Synthetic CT generation from CBCT images via deep learning. Med. Phys 47, 1115–1125 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shoukri B et al. Minimally Invasive Approach for Diagnosing TMJ Osteoarthritis. J. Dent. Res 98, 1103–1111 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bianchi J et al. Software comparison to analyze bone radiomics from high resolution CBCT scans of mandibular condyles. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol 20190049 (2019). doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Paniagua B et al. Diagnostic Index: An open-source tool to classify TMJ OA condyles. Proc. SPIE--the Int. Soc. Opt. Eng 10137, 101372H (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.de Dumast P et al. A web-based system for neural network based classification in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph 67, 45–54 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Michoud L et al. A web-based system for statistical shape analysis in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Proc. SPIE--the Int. Soc. Opt. Eng 10953, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yushkevich PA, Gao Y & Gerig G ITK-SNAP : an interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images. 3342–3345 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pieper S, Halle M & Kikinis R 3D Slicer. in 2004 2nd IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: nano to macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821) 632–635 (IEEE, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kononenko I & Kukar M Machine Learning Basics. Mach. Learn. Data Min 59–105 (2007). doi: 10.1533/9780857099440.59 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Michoud L et al. A web-based system for statistical shape analysis in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Proc. SPIE--the Int. Soc. Opt. Eng 10953, 27 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ghahramani Z Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence. Nature 521, 452–459 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.He K, Zhang X, Ren S & Sun J Deep residual learning for image recognition. in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016). doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ronneberger O, Fischer P & Brox T U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9351, 234–241 (Springer Verlag, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chan T & Vese L An active contour model without edges. in International Conference on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision 141–151 (Springer, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cortes C & Vapnik V Support-Vector Networks. Mach. Learn 20, 273–297 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Berrar D Cross-validation. Encycl. Bioinforma. Comput. Biol 1, 542–545 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Larheim TA, Abrahamsson A-K, Kristensen M & Arvidsson LZ Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 44, 20140235 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bianchi J et al. Quantitative bone imaging biomarkers to diagnose temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES