Perspective on the Therapeutic Applications of Algal Polysaccharides

Abstract

Abstract

Algae are an enormous source of polysaccharides and have gained much interest in human flourishing as organic drugs. Algal polysaccharides have aroused interest in the health sector owing to the various bioactivities namely anticancer, antiviral, immunoregulation, antidiabetic and antioxidant effects. The research community has comprehensively described the importance of algal polysaccharides regarding their extraction, purification, and potential use in various sectors. However, regardless of all the intriguing properties and potency in the health sector, these algal polysaccharides deserve detailed investigation. Hence, the present review emphasizes extensively on the previous and latest developments in the extraction, purification, structural properties and therapeutic bioactivities of algal polysaccharides to upgrade the knowledge for further advancement in this area of research. Moreover, the review also addresses the challenges, prospective research gaps and future perspective. We believe this review can provide a boost to upgrade the traditional methods of algal polysaccharide production for the development of efficacious drugs that will promote human welfare.

Graphic Abstract

Introduction

Algae are considered the largest and the most propitious natural resources for the next generation biorefineries. It is included in the polyphyletic group and comprises organisms varying from unicellular microalgae (e.g., Chlorella) to multicellular macroalgae (e.g., Kelps). These algae lack vascular tissues and are categorized as photosynthetic eukaryotic organisms [1].

Currently, the global market for algae is approximately U.S. $782.9 million which is expected to reach nearly U.S. $1.2 billion by 2027 [2]. Algal cultivation is encouraged worldwide to meet the requirement of renewable biomass source for industrial implementation and also for the production of sustainable feed and energy. The ever-increasing inclination towards algae is due to their easy availability and very few side effects [3]. Moreover, there are numerous benefits associated with algae such as no additional freshwater or fertilizer is required for its cultivation, the produce is very high as compared to land plants and even its production method does not occupy any extra agricultural space or terrestrial land [4].

These algae contain large quantities of polysaccharides as their main cell wall constituent that imparts them flexibility and strength to sustain strong waves and uphold ionic equilibrium [5]. Polysaccharides are biomacromolecules, composed of about 30–50 monosaccharide units joined together by a glycosidic bond, together with many complex sugars [6]. The polymeric chain resulting in polysaccharide can either be linear or branched, linked to different substituents viz. amino acids, sulphates or acyl groups [7]. At first, used by the industries as thickening agents, polysaccharides have now garnered considerable attention by the researchers due to their various therapeutic bioactivities like antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer, radioprotective, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects [8].

Since the demand for polysaccharide is rising rapidly, researchers worldwide are trying to utilize these natural algal biomasses to fulfil the requirements. The exploitation of these excellent natural resources for the extraction of polysaccharides not only supports the agenda of going green but also makes the entire process recyclable and renewable creating a sustainable environment. Furthermore, the polysaccharides procured from algae are innocuous, readily available in the environment, safe, biodegradable, biocompatible and inexpensive [9]. Polysaccharides like fucoidan, carrageenan, alginates, laminarin and ulvan have been successfully extracted from algae and utilized as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant, anticoagulant, immunostimulatory and antiproliferative agents [10–14].

Despite the fact a considerable amount of research has been reported on the potency of these algal polysaccharides in the health sector, their commercial products are still scanty in the market. Thus, we should try increasing our knowledge and understanding of algal polysaccharides, so that high value-added implementation of these algal polysaccharides could bring possibilities for establishing a blooming industry. Moreover, the polysaccharide yield of algae is generally low. Therefore, the scientific community from around the globe should consider developing the methods for extracting algal polysaccharides that would improve the extraction yield, are completely green, socially acceptable, less toxic and commercially viable to attain a sustainable environment.

Thus, to procure and purify algal polysaccharides with maximum therapeutic bioactivities, ideal algal strain together with the appropriate extraction strategies and good manufacturing practices should be adopted. Therefore, the present review provides a comprehensive overview of the extraction, purification, characterization and therapeutic activities of algal polysaccharides. Extensive studies on the conventional and advanced extraction techniques are reviewed together with a critical discussion on their merits and demerits. The latest information on the bioactivities of algal polysaccharides together with their mechanism is also described. The article identifies the challenges; research gaps and future perspective in this particular area of research that would help enhance the knowledge to meet the bioeconomic issues and opportunities.

Extraction of Polysaccharides from Algae

The entire procedure for the extraction of algal polysaccharides encompasses a series of steps namely, preparation and pre-treatment of algae followed by extraction and purification methods to procure the required polysaccharide. Subsequently, the isolated polysaccharides are probed for their bioactivities and prospective industrial applications.

Preparation of Algal Biomass Before Extraction

This is the basic step of polysaccharide extraction. The procedure is initiated by cleaning the algae using distilled or seawater, to remove the soil particles and epiphytes associated with algae. The process is followed by either air drying, freeze-drying or oven-drying the biomass [15, 16]. The dried biomass then undergoes the process of milling to generate fine particles with a high surface to volume ratio consequently increasing its interaction with solvent and enhancing the efficiency of extraction. A novel method was patented as an alternative to the drying method [17] which were found to be highly efficient towards obtaining laminarin and fucoidan from living, harvested macroalgal biomass by exudate method, wherein, the polysaccharides, were procured from the harvested algal exudate solution.

Pre-treatment of the Biomass Before Extraction

Various types of pre-treatments are provided to the dried algal biomass to eliminate proteins, lipids, pigments, phenols, mannitol and other low molecular weight compounds that remain bound to the polysaccharide. Thus, a myriad of solvents and their mixtures with varied polarities that do not induce any structural alteration in the polysaccharide are utilized. Pre-treatment of algal biomass with formaldehyde is the most favourable method for alginate extraction [18–20]. January et al. [21] used methanol, chloroform and water in the ratio of 4:2:1 (v/v/v) for fucoidan extraction. Similarly, for laminarin extraction from Gongolaria barbata (formerly known as Cystoseira barbata), Sellimi et al. [22] treated the algal biomass first with the solvent mixture of acetone and methanol in the ratio of 7:3 (v/v), followed by chloroform treatment for 24 h at 30 ℃. Due to the toxicity and negative environmental impact of chloroform, its usage is restricted and new alternative pre-treatment methods, free of chloroform are being recommended. Sahera et al. [23] pre-treated Polycladia myrica (formerly known as Cystoseira myrica) using petroleum ether and acetone before polysaccharide extraction. Similarly, Abid et al. [24] removed lipophilic pigments and low molecular weight proteins from Dictyopteris polypodioides (formerly known as Dictyopteris membranacea)and Padina pavonica using petroleum ether and acetone. Additionally, many other possibilities with solvents: acetone and ethanol at varying temperatures have been discovered for the pre-treatment process [25]. Recently, Huang et al. [26] have reported a novel pre-treatment method for extraction of fucoidan that includes compressional puffing-hydrothermal process, which allows the heating of algae at high atmospheric pressures viz. 140, 180 and 220 ℃ ensuing a rapid drop of pressure in a container carrying superhot water, leading to variations in the cell structure of algae. At a laboratory scale, low molecular weight proteins are usually removed using Sevag reagent, but due to the presence of chloroform in it, enzymatic hydrolysis under mild conditions are preferred [27]. Mostly, phenols are eliminated from algae by bleaching with hydrogen peroxide but its high concentration can decompose polysaccharide, thereby decreasing its molecular weight and extraction yield [28, 29]. Thus, recently, organic solvents and microporous resins are being utilized for phenol removal [30, 31].

Conventional Extraction Techniques for Algal Polysaccharides

Extraction is the prime step in isolating polysaccharides from the algae. Thus, to extract the polysaccharides from the cell walls of various species of algal biomass, some explicit techniques have been utilized to reach the conditions where the desired compound is drawn out easily. The conventional method of algal polysaccharide extraction mainly uses solvents like hot water, acids, alkalis or a combination of these as an extraction medium. The process involves administering the pre-treated algal biomass to different solvents for definite hours at different temperatures to obtain polysaccharides with minimum impurities [32]. Also, the produce of polysaccharide after extraction using these solvents is species dependent. For example, a 43.57% (w/w) of total polysaccharide comprising fucoidan, alginate and laminarin were extracted from algae Durvillaea potatorum using 0.05 M HCL at 60 ℃ for 3 h [33]. Chi et al. [34] reported extraction of 11.27 g of rhamnan rich sulphated polysaccharide ulvan from Ulva clathrata using hot water. Furthermore, 19% (w/w) fucoidan was recovered from Sargassum sp. utilizing a hot buffer as an extraction medium at 60 ℃, pH 4 and buffer: alga ratio of 10 ml/g [35]. Carrageenan yield of 32.95 ± 1.43% from Kappaphycus alvarezii have been reported by Meinita et al. [36] using an alkaline method (60% KOH solution) at 80 ℃ for 3 h.

Although conventional methods produce a certain amount of polysaccharide from algal biomass a couple of constraints such as lengthy extraction time with little production of polysaccharides, requirement of high purity solvents accompanied by their excess evaporation, manual handling, problems in the management of heat-labile compounds and environmental threat due to contaminating organic compounds restrict their use and consequently make these methods less feasible [37]. Thus, to combat the flip side of these conventional techniques, some innovative and propitious unconventional extraction methods have been introduced. Mostly, these non-conventional methods abide by the standards defined by the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and hence are believed to be “green” and eco-friendly in nature. Significant benefits associated with these non-conventional techniques include the reduced application of chemicals, environment-friendly processing conditions, low utilization of water, highly energy-efficient, less use of solvents, cost-effectiveness, higher efficacy, decreased generation of by-products and utilization of green solvents such as deep eutectic solvents. Deep eutectic solvents are liquids (at a temperature lower than 100 ℃), consisting of two or more cheap and impervious substances, linked through hydrogen bonds, forming a eutectic mixture having a melting point less than that of individual constituent [38, 39]. These solvents offer benefits like inconsiderable vapour pressure, excellent thermal characters, broad liquid range, good solubility, low cost, eco-friendly nature and exceptional recycling property [40]. The new unconventional techniques for the extraction of algal polysaccharides are further detailed in the succeeding sections.

Advanced Extraction Methodologies for Algal Polysaccharides

Supercritical Fluid Extraction Method

Supercritical fluid extraction is a method in which the separation of the components takes place from the matrix by using supercritical fluids as an extracting solvent [41]. A supercritical fluid is any homogenous fluid formed at a temperature and pressure above its critical point, where liquid and gas phases become indistinguishable [42]. It can effuse through solids like a gas and dissolve materials like a liquid. The most commonly used supercritical solvent for extraction is carbon dioxide owing to its heat transfer and thermodynamics characteristics, non-hazardous nature, chemical inertness, low cost, non-flammability and eco-friendly behaviour [43–45]. The supercritical fluid extraction technique was first used in 1969 by Zosel for extracting valuable compounds at an industrial scale [46]. Since then, a lot of compounds like lipids, fatty acids, antioxidants have been extracted using this supercritical fluid extraction method [47] but very few reports on the extraction of algal polysaccharides utilizing the same technique have been published [48, 49]. This can be due to some challenges associated with this method namely, high cost, as the requirement of high pressure, increases the overall budget as compared to the conventional liquid extraction method and the non-polar nature of the carbon dioxide makes it inappropriate as a solvent for polar solutes [50, 51]. Though the method has some drawbacks; advantages like reduced product contamination, great selective extraction, the requirement of less time for processing, faster diffusivities of supercritical fluid and its absolute separation from the analyte [52, 53] establishes it as a suitable method for the extraction of algal polysaccharides and should be explored extensively by the scientific community from all over the world. The working scheme of the supercritical fluid extraction method is represented in Fig. 1 that comprises a CO₂ reservoir, CO₂ pump, co-solvent reservoir, co-solvent pump, extraction cell; back pressure valve and collector. The system of supercritical fluid extraction is established on (i) dynamic mode (ii) static mode (iii) a combination of both.

Fig. 1.

Schematic layout of the working scheme for the supercritical fluid extraction method

Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction

Ultrasound-assisted extraction is believed to be one of the highly sophisticated, useful and functional methods for the extraction of polysaccharides from algae owing to their low cost, easy handling, user-friendliness, rapid rate of extraction, little usage of solvents and higher plausibility of upgrading to industrial level [54, 55]. Moreover, it can be amalgamated with other advanced technologies like an enzyme or microwave-assisted extraction, supercritical fluid extraction methods for enhanced recovery of polysaccharides [56, 57]. Ultrasound-assisted extraction is the process where ultrasound frequencies of more than 20 kHz are employed to wobble the fine particles in the sample for the extraction of various polysaccharides from algae. Customarily, the extraction process is mediated by the movement of ultrasonic waves that creates high energy cavitation bubbles containing solvent vapour. Eventually, these cavitations collapse and ultrasonic waves are metamorphosed into mechanical energy. This mechanical energy then ruptures the cell wall and reduces the particle size. As the cell wall ruptures, the polysaccharides are released out [58]. Ultrasound technology together with hydrothermal assisted extraction and thermal treatment yielded 2971.7 ± 61.9 mg fucose/100 g dried macroalgal residue from Ascophyllum nodosum [59]. Santagata et al. [60] described the ultrasound-assisted extraction of alginate from Sargassum. Hariharasubramanian et al. [61] stated improved yield of polysaccharide (24.8% ± 1.28%) by using a pulsed ultrasonic treatment in comparison to conventional hot water extraction that yielded only 11.08 ± 0.78% polysaccharide from Sargassum muticum. Additionally, fucoidan was also extracted from Sargassum muticum by ultrasonication at 25 ºC for 5–30 min [62]. The crude fucoidan showed the maximum sulphate content of 39.54 ± 0.001 mg sulphate ion/g extract. Hmelkov et al. [63] utilized ultrasound aided extraction of polysaccharide fucoidan from Fucus distichus subsp. evanescens (formerly known as Fucus evanescens). The fraction of the obtained fucoidan showed anticancer activity in vitro towards human colon carcinoma. Recently, ultrasonic-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Sargassum horneri utilizing deep eutectic solvents was suggested by Nie et al. [64]. Results reported a polysaccharide yield of 11.31% in 30 min with significant antioxidant activities.

The efficacy of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polysaccharides is determined by multiple variables like time, temperature, ultrasonic power and ratio of solvent to solids. Thus, it becomes imperative to optimize these parameters to attain the maximum yield of polysaccharide. Garcia-Vaquero et al. [65] reported extraction of fucose (1060.7 ± 70.6 mg/100 g dried seaweed) and total glucans (968.6 ± 13.3 mg/100 g ds) from Laminaria digitata at the optimized conditions (76 ºC, 10 min and amplitude of 100%) obtained through response surface methodology. Moreover, Vázquez-Rodríguez et al. [66] utilized the optimum parameters (50 ºC, ultrasound power density 3.8 W/cl, solvent/seaweed ratio of 30 ml/g and 32.33% ethanol concentration) obtained through Box-Behnken design model that yielded 23% (w/w) polysaccharides using ultrasonic extraction from a brown seaweed Silvetia compressa. Response surface methodology was also applied by Rahimi et al. [67] to optimize the parameters for ultrasound augmented extraction of ulvan from Ulva intestinalis. At optimum conditions, 8.30% of ulvan was obtained that exhibited reducing and 2,2-diphenyl picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging capability. A polysaccharide yield of 13.583 ± 0.51%, was obtained from Arthrospira platensis (formerly known as Spirulina platensis) by Kurd and Samavati [68] at optimum conditions of 25 min, 85 ºC, 90 W ultrasonic power and ratio of water to raw material 20 ml/g determined by response surface methodology. The extracted polysaccharide showed anticancer activity. The schematic workflow of ultrasound-mediated extraction is shown in Fig. 2. It consists of a sonicator probe, hot plate and ultrasonicator generator to maintain temperature and power, respectively.

Fig. 2.

Schematic layout showing the work flow for ultrasound-assisted extraction method

Pressurized Liquid Extraction

Recently, pressurized liquid extraction has been regarded as one of the fastest, safest and easiest approaches for the extraction of algal polysaccharides [69]. It was first introduced by Richter et al. [70] as a new technique to extract various biochemical compounds by coalescence of elevated temperature and pressure with liquid solvents. The temperature and pressure conditions employed in the pressurized liquid extraction method are between 50–200 °C and 3.5–20 MPa, respectively [71]. Due to its broad range of functionality, it is also diversely designated as pressurized solvent extraction, pressurized fluid extraction, accelerated solvent extraction or subcritical water extraction [71, 72]. The various benefits associated with pressurized liquid extraction are: it is faster, easier to use, automated, requires minimal solvent, saves time and money, increases productivity, improves reproducibility and significantly minimizes exposure to solvents [73]. These advantages completely satisfy the agenda of achieving a green and sustainable environment. Saravana et al. [74] utilized pressurized liquid extraction to extract fucoidan from brown seaweed Saccharina japonica. 8.23% of crude fucoidan was extracted with a molecular weight ranging between 83.39–183.32 kDa. The obtained fucoidan displayed excellent antioxidant activities. The pressurized liquid extraction approach was utilized as an alternative green approach by Santoyo et al. [75] to extract polysaccharide fractions from edible brown seaweed Himanthalia elongata. The polysaccharide fraction proved effective as an antiviral drug opposite Herpes Simplex Virus Type I. Pressurized liquid extraction of polysaccharides from seaweeds can be performed in both the static and dynamic mode [76–78]. Commercially, a static mode is more frequently utilized to extract polysaccharides than the dynamic mode [79]. The performance of the pressurized liquid extraction method is dependent on diverse parameters viz. pressure, temperature, extraction solvent, several cycles and time [80]. Each of these parameters can be optimized separately using some experimental designs or statistical software for maximum retrieval of polysaccharides. A schematic depiction of a pressurized liquid extraction system and its workflow is represented in Fig. 3. Generally, the extraction equipment consists of a solvent tank linked to a high-pressure pump. A nitrogen gas tank and solvent tank follow the pressure pump and both are coupled with the oven. Valves regulate the flow of the solvent and nitrogen gas into the extraction unit which is positioned within the oven. The extracted compound is then collected in the collection vial.

Fig. 3.

Diagrammatic representation of the working scheme for the pressurized liquid extraction method

Microwave-Assisted Extraction

Microwave-assisted extraction is another novel technique that has been extensively utilized to obtain high-value biologically active compounds from algae and plants [81, 82]. Apart from being environment friendly, the microwave-assisted extraction method offers some magnificent benefits like simplicity in functionality, less utilization of solvents, short extraction period, improved yield and also obstructs the breakdown of compounds that are readily degraded by heat [83, 84]. Owing to these advantages, this technique has been widely used by researchers for the procurement of polysaccharides from algae. Cao et al. [85] employed microwave-assisted aqueous two-phase extraction for the simultaneous recovery and separation of polysaccharides from Sargassum pallidum. The results displayed a maximum polysaccharide yield of 0.75 ± 0.04% of top phase and 6.81 ± 0.33% of bottom phase at 15 min, 95 ºC, microwave power 830 W, 22.0% ammonium sulphate (w/w), 21.0% ethanol (w/w) and the ratio of material to liquid 1:60 (g/ml). A 29.3% of carrageenan was extracted from Solieria chordalis utilizing the microwave-assisted extraction method at 10 min and 90 ºC [86]. The obtained carrageenan exhibited antiviral activity against Herpes simplex virus type I. Similarly, Le et al. [87] also obtained polysaccharide ulvan from Ulva australis (formerly known as Ulva pertusa) employing microwave technology and studied its antioxidant activities. The results established that the ulvan enhanced the activities of oxidative enzymes like catalase and superoxide dismutase. Chen and Xue [88] applied response surface methodology to optimize the microwave-assisted technology for the extraction of polysaccharides from Neoporphyra haitanensis (formerly known as Porphyra haitanensis). They found that 28.98 ml/g ratios of water to raw material, 77.84 W microwave power and 14.14 min extraction time yielded 5.02% polysaccharide. The extracted polysaccharide was determined as a prospective candidate for clinical use in cancer prevention. Ren et al. [89] also recovered 2.84 ± 0.09% polysaccharides from Sargassum thunbergii employing microwave extraction method at extraction time 23 min, microwave power 547 W, extraction temperature 80 °C, and the ratio of raw material to water 1:27 g/ml. Additionally, microwave-assisted extraction using deep eutectic solvent was employed for the extraction of polysaccharides from Fucus vesiculosus. A maximum of 116.33 mg/g of polysaccharide was procured in 35 min at 168 ℃ with excellent antioxidant and anticancer activities in vitro [90]. Figure 4 shows the schematic diagram of the microwave-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from seaweeds. Generally, this technique utilizes microwaves to produce high temperatures and evaporation of intracellular extracts. This results in the degradation of the cell wall and the discharge of intracellular compounds in the medium.

Fig. 4.

Schematic representation of the workflow for the microwave-assisted extraction method

Enzyme Assisted Extraction

In recent times, enzyme assisted extraction of polysaccharides from algae has gained a lot of attention due to some remarkable benefits namely (a) environmentally safe process (b) high specificity (c) requirement of less energy (d) rapid extraction method (e) high efficiency (f) negligible use of toxic chemicals (g) recyclability (h) easy recovery (i) high productivity (j) high catalytic efficacy [91–93]. Moreover, the enzymes used in the extraction process are innocuous, environment friendly and can be easily utilized in large scale operations [94]. A variety of enzymes such as carrageenases, cellucast, agarose, alcalase, amyloglucosidase and xylanase have been considerably utilized as catalysts in the enzyme extraction process [95, 96]. Alboofetileh et al. [97] extracted fucoidan from brown algae Nizamuddinia zanardinii using flavourzyme, alcalase, viscozyme and cellucast. They reported that maximum polysaccharide was obtained using alcalase enzyme with immune-enhancing and anticancer activities. Fucoidan was also obtained from Fucus distichus subsp. evanescens and Saccharina latissima using the enzymes cellulase and alginate [98]. Fournière et al. [99] extracted crude polysaccharide ulvan from Ulva sp. by combining enzyme assisted extraction with depolymerization. The obtained ulvan exhibited anti-inflammatory activities.

Enzyme assisted extraction method promotes the breakdown of the cell wall, which successively enhances the cell wall permeability, leading to the higher yield of polysaccharides from algae [100]. More precisely, enzyme assisted extraction is dependent on two techniques: (a) enzyme assisted cold pressing (b) enzyme assisted aqueous extraction [101]. Different parameters like pH, temperature, type of enzyme, the concentration of enzyme, surface area, the moisture content are considered pivotal for the extraction process and must be optimized to achieve high productivity [102, 103]. Hammed et al. [104] stated the optimum conditions: extraction stage of 2, hydrolysis time of 19.5 h and enzyme concentration of 1.5 μl/ml to produce 25.13% sulphated polysaccharide. Enzyme assisted extraction methods to extract polysaccharides from algae is established as an environmentally friendly approach as it utilizes water as solvents instead of organic chemicals [100]. Figure 5 depicts the schematic representation of the enzyme assisted extraction of polysaccharides from algae.

Fig. 5.

Graphic representation of the workflow for enzyme assisted extraction method

Other Ingenious Extraction Methods

Besides, the extraction methods discussed above, various ingenious methods such as photobleaching, high hydrostatic pressure treatment and reactive extrusion have as well shown encouraging results in the extraction of polysaccharides from seaweeds. For example, Li et al. [105] employed the novel environment-friendly photo-bleaching process for the extraction of agar from Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis (formerly known as Gracilaria lemaneiformis). The obtained photobleached agar showed excellent gel strength of 1913 g/cm². Rodrigues et al. [106] used high hydrostatic pressure to obtain polysaccharides from Sargassum muticum. About 40.4% of polysaccharide was extracted with improved antioxidant activities. Another innovative technique called reactive extrusion was applied for extracting polysaccharide from Laminaria digitata by [107]. The authors reported a high yield of alginate (39%) in a very less time (5 min) as compared to the alginate concentration (33%) obtained through the conventional alkaline extraction method in 1 h.

Shortcomings of the Advanced Extraction Methods

The aforementioned advanced extraction techniques have been described comprehensively by researchers with outstanding advantages compared to the traditional extraction methods. Howbeit, some reports have stated a few limitations of these advanced extraction technologies (Table 1). These shortcomings are primarily because of the high temperature or pressure and plausible degeneration of the extracted polysaccharide. Since, all the novel techniques have their advantages, disadvantages and mechanism for the extraction of polysaccharides, therefore certain factors like nature and purity of the procured polysaccharide, the requirement of solvent and energy during the extraction process should be contemplated before choosing the suitable extraction method. However, the boundaries between these novel extraction techniques are ambiguous and thus a compromise should be made on the technique which has a maximum number of benefits.

Table 1.

Demerits of various green extraction technologies

Extraction techniques	Disadvantages	References
Supercritical extraction technique	High cost, inappropriate for polar solutes, high power consumption	[108]
Ultrasound-assisted extraction	Degradation of compounds may occur at high frequency and long processing time, extra filtration step may be required, the noise level is high, mixing is not homogenous, destruction of seaweed can occur, high temperature can negatively affect the process, a suitable probe is needed to have homogenous sonication intensity	[109, 110]
Pressurized liquid extraction	It may not be suitable for thermolabile compounds, can produce dirty extracts which may need further cleaning, expensive	[111]
Microwave-assisted extraction	Costly, thermo-labile polysaccharides can be degraded, may require filtration after the extraction process, high pressure and temperature used in closed vessel system can pose a safety risk, the sample throughput is lower in open vessel system as it cannot process many samples simultaneously	[112, 113]
Enzyme assisted extraction	Expensive, sometimes enzymes are not able to completely rupture the cell wall, complexity in usage, the efficiency of an enzyme is dependent on various environmental factors that’s why not feasible for industrial application	[114, 115]
Photobleaching	Costly, can give different results depending on the changing weather conditions, can cause chemical alterations in the molecule	[116]
Reactive extrusion	The size of reactors used is big, costly, less explored	[107, 111]
High hydrostatic pressure	Can affect the structure and activity of polysaccharide	[106, 117]

Purification and Structural Characterization of Extracted Polysaccharides

The extracted crude polysaccharide is linked to various unwanted impurities/compounds such as monosaccharides, sulphates, lipids, proteins and pigments. Thus, further separation and purification steps become challenging and hence necessary. The obtained crude polysaccharide is first precipitated with ethanol to remove low molecular weight impurities [118]. Precipitated polysaccharides are then separated by centrifugation [119]. The proteins in the solution are removed using the Sevag reagent or trichloroacetic acid method followed by dialysis against distilled water and drying [73, 120]. The most preferred method for drying polysaccharide is lyophilization due to its low effect on the structure and activity [121]. Furthermore, to achieve high throughput screening and purification, the resulting polysaccharides are subjected to various column chromatographic techniques. Various models of column chromatography such as Sephacryl S-300, Superdex 200, PL aqua gel-OH, Sepharose CL-6B, DEAE cellulose column, Q-Sepharose fast flow column have been utilized in polysaccharide purification from algae [122, 123]. Apart from the chromatographic techniques, membrane separation technology that includes ultrafiltration, nanofiltration or reverse osmosis have also gained a lot of popularity for the purification of polysaccharides from algae for their successful application in industries [124, 125]. Table 2 summarizes the different purification techniques along with their merits and demerits. Some of the algal polysaccharides purified using different techniques are compiled in Table 3 together with their experimental conditions.

Table 2.

Some of the purification techniques together with their advantages and disadvantages

Technique	Principle	Advantages	Disadvantages	References
Ion exchange chromatography	Depends on the reversible adsorption of charged solute molecules to immobilized groups of opposite charge	Suitable for purifying various neutral and acidic polysaccharides	An expensive, change in the pH of the buffer can alter the height of the column bed	[126]
Size exclusion chromatography	Based on the difference in sizes from biomolecules as they pass through the column packed with a chromatographic medium	Easy, rapid and efficient process of separation, large molecules can be easily separated from small molecules with a minimum amount of eluate	Not suitable for the purification of mucopolysaccharides, eluent’s ionic strength should not be less than 0.2 mol/L	[127, 128]
Affinity chromatography	Depends on the reversible adsorption of biomolecules through biospecific interaction on the ligand	High efficiency	Difficult to find a proper ligand for a given polysaccharide	[126]
Counter current chromatography	Based on the liquid–liquid separation method that separates different solutes by utilizing the differential partition coefficient of two immiscible solvents	No loss of sample, no irreversible adsorption, easy operation	Lower efficiency	[129, 130]
Diafiltration	Removal of permeable molecules like salts, small proteins, solvents based on their molecular size by using micro molecule permeable filters	Fast, no loss of sample or contamination	Difficulty in cleaning, membrane deformation	[131]
Ultra-filtration	Based on the pressure-induced separation of solutes from a solvent through a semi-permeable membrane	Low operating pressure required, lower energy consumption, cheap	Sensitive to oxidative chemicals, membrane damage at pressure more than 3 bar	[132]

Table 3.

Polysaccharides purified from seaweeds with their experimental conditions

Polysaccharide	Seaweed	Experimental conditions	References
Crude Polysaccharide	Grateloupia livida	DEAE Sepharose CL–6B (2.6 × 30 cm) eluted with H2O	[133]
(CLP)	Caulerpa lentillifera	DEAE cellulose 52 anion exchange columns (5.0 × 50 cm) eluted with NaCl	[134]
Crude Ecklonia kurome polysaccharides	Ecklonia cava subsp. Kurome (formerly known as Ecklonia kurome)	DEAE-52 cellulose column (2.6 × 30 cm) eluted by distilled water	[135]
Sulphated polysaccharides	Polycladia indica (formerly known as Cystoseira indica)	DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow column, eluted with distilled water	[136]
Exopolysaccharide	Porphyridium purpureum (formerly known as Porphyridium cruentum)	Diafiltration (0.14 μm ceramic membrane)	[137]
polysaccharides from Gracilaria rubra (GRPS)	Gracilaria dura (formerly known as Gracilaria rubra)	DEAE-52 cellulose column (2.6 30 cm) eluted with distilled water	[138]
sulphated polysaccharides	Sargassum tenerrimum	DEAE-Sepharose anion-exchange chromatography ((2 cm × 15 cm) eluted with Tris HCl buffer	[16]
Polysaccharide	Chlorella sp.	DEAE Sepharose (1.2 cm × 20 cm) eluted with PBS	[139]
Laminarin	Gongolaria barbata (formerly known as Cystoseira barbata)	Ultrafiltration using 50 kDa cut-off membranes	[140]

Even though an array of purification techniques has been established but still, there are no standard protocols for the utilization of these techniques in the specific area. For example, in the food industry, the crude seaweed polysaccharide is primarily obtained using ethanol precipitation and membrane separation. Simultaneously, affinity chromatography and size exclusion chromatography are applied in pharmaceutical industries for procuring high-grade fractions of polysaccharides [8].

The bioactivities of algal polysaccharides are closely linked to their structures. Therefore, elucidating the structural characteristics of algal polysaccharides can play an important role in exploring their biological activity [140]. The structural characterization of algal polysaccharide involves the analysis of their monosaccharide composition, molecular weight determination, type of glycosidic bonds and their backbone structure. The analytical techniques majorly applied by the researchers for the determination of polysaccharide structure comprises high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [141], Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) [142], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [143], a hyphenated gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC–MS) [144], x-ray diffraction method [145], ultra-violet spectroscopy [146]. However, the existence of sulphate groups in algal polysaccharides pose an additional challenge in determining their structure as the position and degree of sulphation, has to be further identified. Generally, HPLC, NMR, turbidometric barium chloride method, IR spectroscopy are performed to identify the degree and position of sulphate groups in algal polysaccharides [147–149]. All the above-mentioned techniques can provide a clear understanding of the obtained polysaccharide’s morphology, crystallization, functional groups and physical strength for successful future biological applications.

Bioactivities and Possible Health Application of Algal Polysaccharide

Algal polysaccharides have been comprehensively explored for their diverse bioactivities such as antiviral, immunomodulatory, anticancer, antioxidant, anti-ageing, anticoagulant and anti-adhesive effects due to their different structural features.

Antiviral Activity

In recent times, a large number of infectious diseases have aroused due to the emerging or re-emerging of viruses. Viral outbreaks have always been a topic of concern as they pose severe challenges to human health. Thus, the developments of efficient antiviral drugs with novel formulations are urgently needed. Researchers globally have reported that polysaccharides isolated from algae have active antiviral properties with low toxicity and resistance [150]. These algae contain a significant amount of complex structural polysaccharides that have displayed the capability to block the various phases of the viral infection process (Fig. 6) in the members of togavirus, flavivirus, rhabdovirus, arenavirus and herpesvirus [151]. Low molecular weight polysaccharide from Ulva australis (formerly known as Ulva pertusa) and Grateloupia filicina displayed a notable antiviral activity against Avian Leucosis Virus Subgroup J [152, 153]. It was found that such low molecular weight polysaccharides purified from their respective algae inhibited the adsorption of the virus onto the host cell. Alboofetileh et al. [57] demonstrated the strong antiviral activity of fucoidan isolated from brown alga Nizamuddinia zanardinii against Herpes Simplex Virus-2 infection. Cao et al. [154] reported the antiviral activity of polysaccharide extracted from Saccharina japonica (formerly known as Laminaria japonica) against the respiratory syncytial virus. The results showed that EC50 of the polysaccharide extract to the virus was 5.27 mg/ml. Moreover, the polysaccharide was found to improve the expression of interferon regulatory factor-3 (IRF-3) which led to enhanced production of interferon-α (IFN-α) eliciting antiviral activity. The antiviral activity of water-soluble polysaccharide, sulphated glucuronorhamnan from green seaweed Monostroma nitidum against the enterovirus 71 was studied by Wang et al. [155]. The results reported that the sulphated polysaccharide inhibited the enterovirus 71 infection by adsorbing to the virus particles and blocking some of the initial steps of the virus life cycle by down-regulating host phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B signalling pathway. Moreover, various types of polysaccharides namely, alginate, fucan, ulvan, glycan, dextran, fucoidan, laminarin have been reported to possess an extensive range of antiviral behaviour in vitro against herpes simplex virus, dengue virus, influenza virus and immunodeficiency virus [156–160]. Thus, it can be summarized that seaweed polysaccharides can be presented as effective, less toxic antiviral agents having great potential in medicine. However, the accurate antiviral mechanism of algal polysaccharides and the impact of algal polysaccharides structure on the antiviral activity is still vague and needs a deeper study in the coming future.

Fig. 6.

Viral infection cycle and antiviral activity of seaweed polysaccharides

As an Immunostimulant

Stimulation of the immune system is considered as one of the prime defence strategies of the body for combating foreign invaders. In recent times, algal polysaccharides have aroused a lot of interest in the regulation of the immune system due to their low toxicity and structural variation. Algal polysaccharides are known to protect cells by directly or indirectly interacting with the immune system and activating several signalling pathways (Fig. 7). A lot of studies have established that algal polysaccharides have efficacious immunostimulant activities both in vitro and in vivo. Sulphated polysaccharide named UPP-2 isolated from Undaria pinnatifida has been reported to promote the pinocytic activity of RAW264.7 macrophages cells and enhanced the secretions of nitric oxide, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) by 8.0, 73.1 and 188.7 times compared to those of the negative control, respectively [161]. Similarly, crude polysaccharides from Chloroidium ellipsoideum (formerly known as Chlorella ellipsoidea) stimulated murine macrophage, RAW264.7 cells, to significantly produce considerable amounts of various cytokines and nitric oxide by the activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-B) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways [162]. In a study by Sun et al. [137], the in vitro immunostimulatory activity of a purified polysaccharide isolated from Caulerpa lentillifera was evaluated. The findings stated that the polysaccharide fractions stimulated macrophages activity by enhancing acid phosphatase activity, phagocytosis and nitric oxide production. Likewise, a water-soluble polysaccharide named CRVP-1, obtained from Caulerpa chemnitzia (formerly known as Caulerpa racemosa var peltate) proliferated the activity of macrophages, secretion of cytokines and production of nitric oxide [163]. Di et al. [138] observed that crude polysaccharide procured from Gracilaria dura (formerly known as Gracilaria rubra) exhibited immunostimulatory activity on RAW264.7 macrophages cell. Two polysaccharides designated as SCP1 and SCP2, isolated from Sargassum carpophyllum demonstrated immunostimulatory activity by promoting the secretion of cytokines, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [164]. Recent studies have shown that Ulva australis (formerly known as Ulva pertusa) polysaccharide promotes the proliferation and phagocytic activity of macrophage, release of nitric oxide, and secretion of TNF-α and IL-6 [165]. The immunostimulant activity of algal polysaccharides is largely determined by their structural characteristics that include molecular weight, functional groups, glycosidic bonds and monosaccharide composition. In the past, some studies have been done on the relationship between polysaccharide structure and immunostimulant activity. In a study, Mehdi Tabarsa et al. [166] isolated two fractions of sulphated polysaccharides from Ulva intestinalis, namely, F1 and F2 with a molecular weight of 87.1 × 10³ and 194.1 × 10³ g/mol, respectively. They reported that the immunostimulant activity of polysaccharide fractions was dependent on their molecular weight. According to their study, lower molecular weight fraction displayed enhanced immunostimulant activity. In another study reported by Qi and Kim [162], the polysaccharide fractions (F1 and F2) of Chloroidium ellipsoideum (formerly known as Chlorella ellipsoidea) stimulated the immunomodulatory activity. However, in this study, the polysaccharide fraction with high molecular weight and protein concentration showed stronger immunostimulant activity. Thus, the relationship between molecular weight and immunostimulant activity of algal polysaccharide is still not clear and needs improvement. Also, it is very difficult to depict the exact details concerning the impact of molecular weight on the algal immunostimulatory activity of polysaccharide by carrying out the same experiments on polysaccharides with different structures. A proper technique that maintains the intact structural features of different polysaccharides, can be effective to investigate the relationship between molecular weight and activity. Moreover, the relationship between other structural features and immunostimulatory activity is rarely stated and therefore requires detailed investigation.

Fig. 7.

Signalling pathways involved in immune system activation by seaweed polysaccharides. PKC: protein kinase C; PI3-K: phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase; CR3: complement receptor 3; SR: scavengers receptors; PLC: phospholipase C; MR: mannose receptors; Dectin-1: dendritic cell-associated C-type lectin-1; TLR-2: Toll-like receptor-2; TLR-4: Toll-like receptor-4; MyD88: myeloid differentiation factor 88; TRIF: Toll/IL-1 domain-containing adaptor inducing interferon β; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; STAT: signal transducers and activators of transcription; IKK: inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-B; IκB: inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B; IRAK: interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase; TRAF6: tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated factor-6; JNK: Jun N-terminal kinase

Anticancer Activities

Cancer, one of the most fatal diseases, is the major cause of mortality across the globe, accounting for approximately 9.6 million deaths in recent years [167]. Generally, chemotherapy is used in the treatment of cancer but it has certain side effects such as anaemia, fatigue, alopecia, and fertility issues, to quote a few of them [168]. Therefore, it becomes important to search for a natural alternative source that can help in combating this life-threatening disease. Polysaccharides acquired from algae have been shown to possess anticancer activity both in vivo and in vitro conditions. Anticancer activities of algal polysaccharides (Fig. 8) are brought about by the following mechanisms: (1) cell cycle arrest (2) depolarization of mitochondrial membrane (3) production of nitric oxide (4) stimulation of immune system against cancer cells (4) apoptosis of tumour [169]. Vaikundamoorthy et al. [169] investigated the anticancer properties of polysaccharide fraction obtained from Sargassum wightii on human breast cancer cells (MCF7 and MDA-MB-231). The results demonstrated that polysaccharides caused apoptosis of breast cancer cells by enhancing ROS generation, breaking the mitochondrial membrane, causing nuclei damage and eventually causing an increase in the activity of caspase 3/9. Fucoidan isolated from Sargassum ilicifolium (formerly known as Sargassum duplicatum) was found to be effective against colony formation of colon cancer cells in vitro [170]. The anticancer impact of polysaccharides, laminarin and fucoidan obtained from brown alga Dictyota dichotoma was explored in vitro on colon cancer cells (HCT-116, HT-29, and DLD-1). The results indicated a decrease in the amount and size of cancer cells colonies [171]. The sulphated fucoidan obtained from Padina boryana inhibited the colony formation of colorectal carcinoma cells DLD-1 and HCT-116 in vitro [172]. Gheda et al. [173] reported that polysaccharide extracted from red alga Jania rubens caused apoptosis in colon and breast cancer cell lines. Laminarins procured from brown seaweeds inhibited proliferation, colony formation, and migration of human colorectal adenocarcinoma, melanoma, and breast adenocarcinoma cells [174]. Chen et al. [175] stated that the sulphated polysaccharides from Tribonema sp. induced cell apoptosis on HepG2 cells. Further, Neoporphyra haitanensis (formerly known as Porphyra haitanensis) polysaccharides had a significant anticancer effect on human colon cancer cells by apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [176]. Based on these encouraging results, seaweed polysaccharides could be effectively utilized as alternative therapeutics for the treatment of various human cancers. Although a lot of research has been published on the in vitro anticancer activity of algal polysaccharide, negligible work has been performed on in vivo studies, which further requires detailed investigation. Moreover, only a few studies on the in vitro relationship between algal polysaccharide structure-antiviral activity has been reported, wherein, structural features such as molecular weight and uronic acid content of the polysaccharide have been considered as the major factor in determining antiviral activity [177, 178]. Thus, thorough research on the in vivo and in vitro structure–activity relationship is required in the time to come.

Fig. 8.

Anticancer activity of seaweed polysaccharide. 1: immunomodulation; 2: cytotoxicity; 3: cell cycle arrest; 4:NO dependent pathway; 5: mitochondrial disruption

Antidiabetic Activities

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic dysfunction that jeopardizes human health with a large number of deaths and illness, after cardiovascular diseases and cancer [151]. Diabetes mellitus has affected around 9.3% of the global adult population by the year 2019 and it is expected to rise to almost 11% by 2045 [179]. Currently, the treatment of diabetes mellitus employs the use of synthetic chemical drugs that can induce certain side effects and toxicity, endangering the patient’s health. As a result, there is an immediate need for an alternative, natural and non-toxic antidiabetic agent that can overcome the limitations of synthetic drugs. Recently, algal polysaccharides were established to have favourable impacts on the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Jia et al. [180] reported that polysaccharides extracted from algae Ascophyllum nodosum, Fucus vesiculosus and Undaria pinnatifida reduced the blood glucose level in diabetic rats. Polysaccharide isolated from Gracilaria opuntia possessed significant antidiabetic properties [181]. Koh et al. [182] stated that fucoidan extracted from Undaria pinnatifida demonstrated considerably stronger inhibiting effects towards α-glucosidase than α-amylase, thus having excellent properties as an antidiabetic agent. The antidiabetic effect of Sargassum confusum polysaccharide hydrolysates in Insulin Resistance HepG2 Cells was investigated in vitro by Yang et al. [183]. The results demonstrated that the polysaccharide hydrolysate not only exhibited strong inhibitory action against α-glucosidase with an IC50 value of 9.9 mg/ml but also amplified the consumption of glucose and enhanced insulin resistance in insulin-resistance HepG2 cells. Furthermore, polysaccharides extracted from Undaria pinnatifida reduced blood glucose level, enhanced glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in HFD/STZ-induced hyperglycaemic mice [184]. Thus, it can be inferred that seaweed polysaccharides can serve as a non-toxic, cheap, potential alternative as therapeutic agents in the treatment of diabetes. However, neither structure–activity relationship is established properly nor sufficient clinical trial studies are performed to assess the algal polysaccharide efficiency as antidiabetic agents. Thus, a comprehensive research should be done to utilize the algal polysaccharides effectively as an agent to treat diabetes.

Antioxidant Activity

Increased free radicals in living organisms can damage the immune system, cause ageing, arthritis, cancer and several other cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases [185]. Recent research has reported that algal polysaccharides play a significant role in the dissolution of free radicals, subsequently, decreasing the oxidative damage in living organisms. The sulphated polysaccharide extracted from Navicula sp. presented 49% and 68 mmol Trolox/g scavenging activity against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2-azino-bis(3-etilbenzotiazolin)-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS⁺), respectively [186]. Jaballi et al. [187] established the antioxidant activity of polysaccharide obtained from red marine macroalga Mazzaella canaliculata (formerly known as Chondrus canaliculatus). Khan et al. [188] described that Neoporphyra haitanensis (formerly known as Porphyra haitanensis) polysaccharides exhibited 53.16% of radical scavenging activity against ABTS⁺.

The antioxidant activity of the fucoidan procured from Spatoglossum asperum was evaluated by Palanisamy et al. [189]. The findings mentioned the DPPH radical scavenging activity and reducing the power of fucoidan. Similarly, fucoidan extracted from brown seaweed Cystoseira compressa also exhibited strong antioxidant activities by ferrous ion chelation, ferric ion reduction and DPPH radical scavenging [190]. Le et al. [87] evaluated the antioxidant activity of polysaccharide ulvan extracted from Ulva australis (formerly known as Ulva pertusa). They stated that ulvan exhibited reducing power in vitro and had a very strong antioxidant activity against DPPH and ABTS⁺. Moreover, ulvan also protected RAW 264.7 cells against H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress by enhancing the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT). Likewise, a crude polysaccharide obtained from Chnoospora minima displayed strong DPPH and alkyl radical scavenging activities and enhanced reactive oxygen species scavenging actions for both 2,2-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) and H₂O₂ induced ROS production in “Chang” liver cell line [191]. Although, polysaccharides from different algal species displayed strong antioxidant activities, the actual mechanism of action of polysaccharides demands a detailed investigation. Also, it is reported that the structural features of algal polysaccharides such as molecular weight, monosaccharide make-up, degree and position of sulphation [164, 191, 192], greatly influence the antioxidant activity, however, how these features affect the activity, is yet unclear.

Other Activities

Other biological activities such as anti-glycation [193], anti-inflammatory [194–197], anti-microbial [198, 199], anti-coagulant [200–204], anti-ageing [205–209] and anti-obesity [208, 209] have also been recognized in seaweed polysaccharides.

Relevant Patents

A sift through one of the international databases “google patents” resulted in about 129,341 hits on algal extraction and its bioactivities. Since it is beyond the capability of this review to mention all the patents, we have limited this section to a couple of inventions (Table 4) related to the extraction, purification and biological activities of algal polysaccharides since 2017. Upon extensive searching, it was observed that a total number of 16,262 patents were filed since 2017, with China contributing to the maximum number of patents (7471). Thus, a large number of patent filing in this area of research states that new methods for extracting algal polysaccharides and their various therapeutic activities are being established and there is continuous demand for these natural polysaccharides.

Table 4.

List of recent patents on algal polysaccharides extraction and its bioactivities

S. No	Title	Inventors	Assignee	Patent grant date	Priority number/date	Patent number	Reference
1	The preparation method of algal polysaccharides extract	Cai Xuwang	Shandong Tianwang Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd	2017–06-13	2017–02-27	CN106832036A	[210]
2	Process for producing, separating and purifying algal polysaccharide	Wang Guanqing, Lou Baihong, Liu Jianqiang and Ye Huawei		2020–07-21	2018–08-25	CN109055456B	[211]
3	Method for removing impurity protein in crude seaweed polysaccharide	Sun yan	Ningbo Lihua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd	2020–04-17	2019–12-16	CN111019009A	[212]
4	A kind of application of algal polysaccharides	Li Pengcheng	Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences	2019–02-26	2015–05-13		[213]
5	Method of enzyme cleavage of polysaccharides derived from algae	Redouan El	Boutachfaiti Universite De Picardie Jules Verne	2013–10-22	2007–06-22	US8563276B2	[214]
6	Application of algal polysaccharide	Chen Xiaolin	Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences	2014–10-15	2014–06-30		[215]
7	A kind of preparation and application containing algal polysaccharides and fulvic acid composite synergistic phosphate fertilizer	Guo Hongmei	Qingdao Haida biological group Co., Ltd	2019–05-07	2018–12-30	CN109721421A	[216]
8	A kind of method for extracting fucoidan from sea-tangle using ultrasonic wave	Zhao wen	Zhao Fangming	2018–02-23	017–09-18	CN107722129A	[217]
9	Rapid screening method and application of immune regulation activity of algal polysaccharide	Huang Riming	South china agricultural university	2021–02-05	2020–10-27	CN112322691A	[218]
10	Application of algal polysaccharide and derivatives thereof in the preparation of medicine for preventing and/or treating novel coronavirus infection	Du Zhiyun	Guangdong University of technology	2020–10-23	2020–07-23	CN111803515A	[219]
11	The new technology of fucoidan is extracted in a kind of waste liquid from kelp processing	Song Shu-liang	Shandong University	2017–10-20	2017–08-23	CN107266606A	[220]
12	Medicine composition for treating lung cancer and preparation method thereof	Huang Honghao	Guotai Zhenxing Technology Co., Ltd	2020–02-04	2019–11-06	CN110742964A	[221]
13	The application and method of fucoidan and its hydrolysis oligosaccharides in preparation probiotics protective agent	Zou Xiang	Southwest University	2019–08-09	2019–06-19	CN110106163A	[222]
14	A kind of method for improving seaweed polysaccharide sulfate recovery rate	Wang Fang	Quanzhou Normal University	2017–12-29	2017–11-01	CN107522795A	[223]
15	Composition with anti-ageing effect and preparation method and application thereof	Zheng Ting	Hubei Mist Biological Technology Co., Ltd	2021–01-05	2020–09-25	CN112168771A	[224]

Challenges and Research Gaps

A plenitude of data is available on the naturally occurring algal polysaccharides with medicinal perspective as anticancer, antiviral, antidiabetic, antifungal agents etc. However, for long-lasting socio-economic and environmental integrity, certain challenges need to be addressed. Although the advanced extraction techniques display high extraction efficiencies at low cost, these are still restricted to laboratory research and cannot be easily scaled up to large scale quantification. Also, majority of the studies on algal polysaccharide are based upon crude polysaccharide, which mainly contains heterogeneous polysaccharide, making it a challenge to depict a definite conclusion. Thus, measures should be taken to properly investigate the methods for the isolation of homogenous polysaccharides. Furthermore, fewer data on a detailed study of algal polysaccharide quality control makes it difficult to analyse the quality of the isolated polysaccharide. Hence, quality assessment of the isolated polysaccharide should be made mandatory, for successful utilization in various industries. Another major concern is the presence of proteins in the extracted polysaccharide. Thus, a cheap, environment-friendly technique should be developed to eliminate proteins from the samples. Additionally, extraction yields are at times quite low and need amelioration for industrial usage. Extracted polysaccharides exhibit immense structural diversity accounting for parameters such as algal species, growth factors, harvesting season, extraction and purification techniques, which is a significant challenge for commercial application. Moreover, elucidating the detailed structure of algal polysaccharide is essential to explore their structure–activity relationships and the underlying mechanism. However, the characterization analysis is mostly based on the monosaccharide composition and molecular weight. Hence, comprehensive research on their molecular structure should be done by applying advanced technologies. Furthermore, various therapeutic activities of algal polysaccharides are studied significantly, but their underlying mechanism must be examined in detail. With regards to the bioactivities of algal polysaccharides, most of the research is concentrated on in vitro studies. Currently, more intricate and pragmatic in vivo studies are lacking, affecting the extensive analysis and investigation of bioactivities of algal polysaccharides. Another issue is the lack of clinical testing of the extracted polysaccharides, which must be addressed, as clinical trials are required to authenticate the efficiency of the polysaccharides so that they can be successfully utilized in the health sector.

Due to the above-mentioned concerns, a broad scientific investigation is desperately needed in this particular field. Besides, several other questions remain unanswered that represent a huge research gap. Significant constraints and research gaps include but not restricted to: (1) negative effect on the marine ecosystem by excessive usage and exploitation of algae for various biological activities (2) short life span of the harvested algal biomass (3) fluctuations in various factors required for algal growth (4) different protocols to stabilize the bioactivities of algal polysaccharide extracted from differing algal species (5) environmental hazard associated with the application of algal polysaccharides in various bioactivities (6) impact of epiphytes and other marine organisms on the metabolic activity of the seaweeds which can later affect their extraction yield (7) in-depth in vivo studies of algal polysaccharides (8) algal polysaccharide application on humans.

Future Perspective and Conclusion

Due to the aforementioned concerns, the future scope in the extraction process of algal polysaccharides and their application in various bioactivities is huge. Since, the monosaccharide composition, molecular mass and structural properties of the extracted polysaccharide vary with the extraction methods, screening can be performed for selecting the appropriate extraction technique according to the particular application. Organic solvents in the extraction process could be replaced with cheap and environment-friendly water or agro-based solvents to improve the extraction yield. Additionally, the pilot-scale study of algal polysaccharide extraction must be conducted to produce data for industrial-scale production. Given that, the industries are under a lot of pressure, to utilize green extraction methods for obtaining polysaccharides, techno-economic analysis of innovative extraction methods should be performed to analyse the environmental and economic assessment on polysaccharide regeneration from algae. Kinetic studies should be performed to comprehend the relationship between different parameters and the underlying mechanism to predict the extraction yield. Also, statistical studies must be established in polysaccharides to examine their mechanism. Another interesting future application that can be looked into is the production of multiple value-added compounds instead of wastes during the extraction process. Moreover, selective modifications in the polysaccharides could be made during the extraction process to understand the structure–function relationship for performing in vivo studies for various biological activities. Although algal polysaccharides are recognised as eco-friendly and effective with few adverse effects, as compared to chemical drugs but still very few clinical trials are reported to date. More and more clinical analysis should be performed to validate the potency of algal polysaccharides in the prevention of diseases.

In conclusion, algal polysaccharides have aroused a lot of fascination amongst the research community globally, owing to their considerable health benefits. However, comprehensive study on their extraction techniques, structure, underlying mechanism and the structure–activity relationship remains ambiguous to a larger extent, making in-depth analysis of these polysaccharides a mandate. Although there are both opportunities and difficulties in this particular area of research, it is still rational to declare that algal polysaccharides, apparently have a great possibility in the health sector as natural drugs.

Funding

This research was supported by the Department of Science and Technology, India under the scheme for “Young Scientists and Technologists” (Grant No. SP/YO/283/2018).

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.