Abstract
Background:
Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) are produced in foods under favorable conditions and considered a potential biological threat.
Aims:
The study was performed to detect enterotoxigenic genes of A and B in coagulase-positive (CPS) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) to evaluate biotypes and antibiotic resistance of isolated Staphylococcus aureus from different meat.
Methods:
A total of 160 meat swab samples were collected from lamb, water buffalo, cattle, and chicken carcasses. Presumptive colonies on Baird Parker agar were subjected to biochemical identification, including Gram staining, catalase, oxidase, and coagulase activity. Relevant colonies separately were subjected to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for identification of Staphylococcus genus, enterotoxigenic genes (sea and seb) and the thermonuclease gene (nuc) specific for the S. aureus. The antibiotic susceptibility test was also carried out using five antibiotics.
Results:
Totally, 150 Staphylococcus spp. were isolated from the samples among which 135 (90%) isolates harbored sea gene, meanwhile, none of the isolates contained seb gene. Twenty-five S. aureus confirmed by PCR from which 15 isolates (60%) belonged to host specific (HS), 7 isolates (28%) belonged to non-host specific (NHS) biotypes, while 3 isolates (12%) were non-typable. Overall, 68%, 56%, 16%, 12%, and 8% of isolates were resistant to penicillin, trimethoprim, gentamicin, oxacillin, and erythromycin, respectively.
Conclusion:
The meats provided from this area were contaminated with enterotoxigenic and antibiotic-resistance staphylococci, which can threaten the health of the consumers. The study showed that not only CPS contain enterotoxin A gene, but also CNS isolates possess this gene, especially in buffalo meat, and thus they are recognized as potential hazards in different meats.
Key Words: Coagulase, Enterotoxin, Meat, PCR, Staphylococcus
Introduction
Staphylococci are Gram-positive bacteria, generally present on the skin and the mucus membranes of humans and animals. More than 40 species and 30 subspecies of Staphylococcus genus have been identified so far. Based on their ability to coagulate human and rabbit plasma, staphylococci are divided into two main groups including coagulase-positive (CPS) and coagulase-negative (CNS) strains (Podkowik et al., 2013 ▶). Among the pathogenic strains of Staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most important pathogens that cause food poisoning in thousands of people each year (Hennekinne et al., 2012 ▶).
Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) are produced in foods by enterotoxigenic strains under favorable temperature and time. In addition to five classical enterotoxins (SEA to SEE) discovered in the 60th century, more than 18 SEs have been identified.
It is reported that the staphylococcal classical enterotoxins are responsible for 95% of staphylococcal food poisoning cases and the other known enterotoxins make the rest of cases (Jay et al., 2005 ▶). SEA is recognized as the most common cause of Staphylococcus food-borne disease worldwide (Kadariya et al., 2014 ▶).
Coagulase-negative staphylococci have been considered as nonpathogenic bacteria in humans and animals for many decades. However, many studies have shown that a relatively high number of CNS isolates could be associated with human and animal infections, as well as in patients with immunodeficiency (Piette and Verschraegen, 2009 ▶; Vasconcelos et al., 2011 ▶). It has been proven today that not only CPS strains can produce toxins, but also CNS isolates can potentially create enterotoxins (Cunha et al., 2006 ▶) due to possessing similar genes.
The importance of CNS has been recognized in human infections and the most related researches have been performed in human cases. It is noticeable that Staphylococcus is host-adapted, and about one-half of the discovered strains are indigenous to humans and animals (Kloos and Bannerman, 2005 ▶).
Based on four biochemical characteristics including staphylokinase presence, bovine plasma coagulation, growth type on crystal violet agar, and β-haemolysin production, S. aureus strains are divided into bovine, ovine, poultry, human, and five other non-host specific (NHS) biovars (Devriese et al., 1984 ▶). The transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria through the food has previously been reported (Angulo et al., 2004 ▶). Therefore, food-related bacteria can be a source of antibiotic-resistant genes (Atanassova et al., 2001 ▶). It is noticeable that limited strains of S. aureus are responsible for food poisonings (Fitzgerald et al., 2003 ▶). Thus, performing phenotypic and genotypic studies may aid in finding the source of contamination. Although it is not so difficult to isolate and identify these bacteria in the laboratory, the genotypic and phenotypic studies are critical due to the inter-species high heterogeneity of the bacteria (Dastmalchi Saei et al., 2009 ▶). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), meat and its by-products are classified as the high-risk foods group, and their contamination with pathogenic bacteria such as S. aureus can make health problems.
Most researchers have focused on the molecular characterization, virulence factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from dairies in the world (Al-Ashmawy et al., 2016 ▶; Baniardalan et al., 2017 ▶; Kukhtyn et al., 2017 ▶; Bellio et al., 2018 ▶). However, few studies have been performed on biotyping and enterotoxigenicity of staphylococci isolated from raw meat. In a Japanese study (Kitai et al., 2005 ▶) on 444 samples of raw chicken meat, S. aureus was isolated from 292 (65.8%) of the samples and most of the enterotoxigenic isolates belonged to the human and poultry biotypes. In another study, of a total of 286 fresh and processed meat samples marketed in Jordan, 33.6% had CPS. Biotyping of S. aureus subsp. aureus isolates revealed that 12%, 24%, 8%, and 27% were human, bovine, ovine, and NHS biovars, respectively (Al-Tarazi et al., 2009 ▶). In Mexico, sixty-two S. aureus isolates were examined in which 79% biotype C (human), 11.3% biotype A (bovine), 6.5% biotype E (canine) and, 3.2% NHS were recognized (Manjarrez López, 2012 ▶).
This study was designed to identify the enterotoxigenic genes of A and B from CPS and CNS, to perform biotyping studies, and to examine the antibiotic resistance of S. aureus isolated from different meat samples in Ahvaz, Iran.
Materials and Methods
Sample collection
In this cross-sectional survey, a total number of 160 meat swab samples were collected from lamb, water buffalo, cattle, and chicken carcasses (40 samples each) in Ahvaz abattoirs, South-West Iran during four months. Samples were collected using three sterile cotton-tipped swabs for each carcass. Swabs were first soaked in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and then rubbed several times on three different parts of each carcass. The swabs were then placed in the test tubes containing 10 ml trypticase soy broth (TSB) medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 7.5% sodium chloride (Kim et al., 2011 ▶). The tubes were transferred to the laboratory under a cool condition in less than 2 h and then incubated for 24 h at 37°C for enrichment.
Isolation of Staphylococcus
An aliquot (100 μL) of the enriched culture was spread onto Baird Parker agar (Hi-media, India) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Presumptive colonies (black or brown, with or without halo around) were subjected to biochemical identification experiments including Gram staining, catalase, oxidase, and coagulase activities.
Tube coagulase test
In a test tube, 0.5 ml of 1:4 diluted bovine plasma was mixed with 0.5 ml of the bacterial suspension. After incubation at 37°C, the tubes were examined periodically after 1, 2, 3, and 6 h for coagulation. Negative tubes were placed at room temperature (25°C) overnight and then were reviewed for clot formation (Devrise et al., 1984 ▶; Murray et al., 2003).
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures
DNA extraction
DNA extraction was performed using the method described by Adwan (2014) ▶. Briefly, presumptive staphylococci colonies were separately grown overnight in 5 ml of TSB at 37°C. One ml of each culture was centrifuged (800 g, 5 min), the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of distilled water and samples were heated at 100°C for 10 min. After heating, the suspension was again centrifuged and the supernatant was used as the PCR template.
PCR and electrophoresis procedure
Each extracted DNA was subjected to the PCR assay for amplification of four genes including specific 16S rRNA for Staphylococcus genus identification, enterotoxigenic genes (sea and seb) and the thermonuclease gene (nuc) specific for S. aureus, using specific primers. The primers, product size, and PCR conditions are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Target genes, product size (bp), sequence of primers, and PCR conditions
Primer | Size (bp) | Sequence | PCR condition | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
16S rRNA | 228 | F: GTAGGTGGCAAGCGTTATCC R: CGCACATCAGCGTCAG |
Denaturation 94°C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 50°C for 45 min, 72°C for 1 min Final extraction 72°C for 5 min |
|
sea | 120 | F: TTGGAAACGGTTAAAACGAA R: GAACCTTCCCATCAAAAACA |
Denaturation 95°C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 50°C for 45 min, 72°C for 1 min Final extraction 72°C for 5 min |
|
seb | 478 | F: TCGCATCAAACTGACAAACG R: GCAGGTACTCTATAAGTGCC |
||
nuc | 359 | F: TCGCTTGCTATGATTGTGG R: GCCAATGTTCTACCATAGC |
Denaturation 95°C for 6 min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, 72°C 30 s Final extraction 72°C for 5 min |
Takashi et al. (2010) |
PCR: Polymerase chain reaction
Each 25 μL PCR reaction consisted 12.5 μL of master mix (2x, Ampliqon, Denmark), 1 μL of a mixture of the two forward and revised primers, 6.5 μL of ddH2O, and 5 μL of template extracted DNA. The mixture was processed in a thermocycler (Bioer Technology Co., China). The amplified PCR products were detected by electrophoresis (Paya Pajoohesh Pars, Iran), stained, and visualized under ultraviolet light illumination (Kiagen, Iran). The following standard strains of S. aureus were used as positive controls: ATCC 25923 for nuc and sea genes; strain 85065 provided by Ataee et al. (2011) ▶ for seb gene; and deionized water was used as a negative control.
Biotyping of S. aureus isolates
Biotyping of S. aureus isolates were performed according to Devriese’s system (1984) ▶. This method is based on four different biochemical tests including staphylokinase detection, β-haemolysin, type of growth on crystal violet agar, and coagulase activity on bovine plasma. The tested strains using this system were divided into five host specific (HS) ecovars (human β+ and β-, poultry, sheep, and bovine), and five different NHS ecovars.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
According to the CLSI method (2006), antimicrobial susceptibility tests were carried out using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. The antimicrobial agents were penicillin (10 μg), oxacillin (1 μg), trimethoprim (23.75 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), and gentamicin (10 μg). A swab was taken from each bacterial suspension (1 × 107 CFU/ml) and stroked trolley on Mueller-Hinton agar (Merck, Germany). Then, the antibiotic discs (Padtan Teb, Iran) were placed on the agar. After incubation at 35°C for 24 h, the diameter of the inhibition zone was measured for each antibiotic for classification of the isolates to resistant, intermediate (reduced susceptibility), or sensitive.
Results
Isolation and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus spp. and S. aureus
According to the biochemical profile (catalase, oxidase, Gram staining and colony morphology), 176 suspected isolates were purified and identified by the PCR technique. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene showed that 150 isolates belonged to the genus Staphylococcus (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
PCR product electrophoresis; detecting the specific gene of Staphylococcus in several suspected isolates. Line 1: Positive control of Staphylococcus (ATCC 25923), Line 2: Gene ladder (100 bp), Line 3: Negative control, Line 4: Negative sample, and Line 5: Staphylococcus spp. positive sample (228 bp)
Staphylococcal isolates were subjected to the second stage of PCR for detection of toxigenic genes. Data showed that 135 (90%) isolates harboring sea gene (Fig. 2) whereas none of them contained seb gene (Table 2).
Fig. 2.
The sea gene identification. Line 1: Gene ladder (100 bp), Line 2: Positive sample (120 bp), and Line 3: Positive control (ATCC 25923)
Table 2.
Number and molecular characteristics of isolated Staphylococcus spp
Meat samples source | Number of Staphylococcus spp. isolates (%) | Number of isolates containing sea gene (%) | Number of isolates without sea/seb gene (%) | Number of CPS (%) | Number of CNS (%) | Number of CPS isolates containing sea gene (%) | Number of CNS isolates containing sea gene (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lamb carcasses | 51 (34) | 49 (32.6) | 2 (1.3) | 39 (26) | 12 (8) | 39 (26) | 10 (6.6) |
Buffalo carcasses | 32 (21.3) | 30 (20) | 2 (1.3) | 15 (10) | 17 (11.3) | 14 (9.3) | 16 (10.6) |
Cattle carcasses | 38 (25.3) | 35 (23.3) | 3 (2) | 31 (20.6) | 7 (4.6) | 29 (19.3) | 6 (4) |
Poultry carcasses | 29 (19.3) | 21 (14) | 8 (5.3) | 18 (12) | 11 (7.3) | 12 (8) | 9 (6) |
Total | 150 (100) | 135 (90) | 15 (10) | 103 (68.6) | 47 (31.3) | 94 (62.6) | 41 (27.3) |
CPS: Coagulase-positive staphylococci, and CNS: Coagulase-negative staphylococci
Among 150 isolated staphylococci, only 25 isolates (16.6%) possessed thermonuclease gene (nuc) considered as S. aureus (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
The PCR product electrophoresis to detect S. aureus. Line 1: Positive control (ATCC 25923), Line 2: Gene ladder (100 bp), and Lines 3 and 4: Positive samples (359 bp)
Biotyping test
All 25 isolated S. aureus were typed by Devriese biotyping system; the number and the prevalence of each biovar are presented in Table 3. This table indicates that 28%, 12%, 16%, and 4% of the isolates were explicitly allocated to sheep, bovine, human (one β+), and poultry biotypes, respectively, whereas seven strain (28%) were of NHS biovars (K-β+CV: A). The remaining three non-typable isolates (2 from buffalo and one from cattle carcasses) were classified according to different results of their reactions in the biotyping system.
Table 3.
The results of S. aureus biotyping isolated from slaughterhouse samples
Meat samples source | Number of isolates | HS biotypes | NHS biotypes | Cannot be biotyped | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poultry ecovar | Sheep ecovar | Bovine ecovar | Human (He) ecovar | Human (β+) ecovar+ | K-β-CV:C | K+β+CV:A | K+β-CV:A | K-β+CV:A | K-β-CV:C | ||||
Lamb carcasses | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Buffalo carcasses | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Cattle carcasses | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | |
Poultry carcasses | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Total | 25 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
HS: Host specific, NHS: Non-host specific
Antibiotic-resistant phenotypic characteristics
Antibiotic susceptibility tests were carried out on all S. aureus isolates. The susceptibility, intermediate, and resistance profiles of the isolates to six tested antibiotics are shown in (Table 4). Overall, 68% of the isolates were resistant to penicillin, 56% to trimethoprim, 16% to gentamicin, and 12% to oxacillin. While, only two isolates (8%) were resistant to erythromycin.
Table 4.
The resistance profile of S. aureus isolated from various meat samples
Type of antibiotic | S. aureus isolated from lamb carcass | S. aureus isolated from buffalo carcass | S. aureus isolated from cattle carcass | S. aureus isolated from poultry carcass | Total number of resistant isolates (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | I | R | S | I | R | S | I | R | S | I | R | R | |
Penicillin | 2 | - | 5 | 3 | - | 8 | 1 | - | 3 | 2 | - | 1 | 17 (68) |
Oxacillin | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 3(12) |
Erythromycin | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 2 (8) |
Gentamicin | 6 | - | 1 | 9 | - | 2 | 3 | - | 1 | 3 | - | - | 4 (16) |
Trimethoprim | 4 | - | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 2 | 14 (56) |
S: Susceptible, I: Intermediate resistant, and R: Resistant
Discussion
Coagulase-negative staphylococci have been well documented as infectious agents (Podkowik et al., 2013 ▶). However, in many cases, the CNS isolates of clinical environments have little clinical significance. Studies concerning the CNS strains have shown that they produce a variety of metabolites including toxins and enzymes (Cunha et al., 2006 ▶).
In the current study, 94 CPS and 41 CNS from 150 staphylococci isolates harbored sea genes (Table 2). These findings indicate a high number of CNS in the raw meat samples of which a high percentage contain enterotoxigenic gene A in Ahvaz abattoirs. These results are consistent with the findings of Huber et al. (2011) ▶ who detected a large number methicillin resistant CNS (48.3%) in samples of livestock, chicken carcasses, bulk tank milk, minced meat, and humans obtained in Switzerland. In another study, Turchi et al. (2020) ▶ isolated 37 CNS from 120 samples of ovine bulk-tank milk in Italy. They highlighted that CNS from ovine milk represented a reservoir of environmental persistence factors. Our findings are consistent with the study of Veras et al. (2008) who reported the highest rate of
enterotoxigenic genes, sea and seb, from confirmed CPS and CNS by examining 16 outbreaks of food poisoning. In a study by Rall et al. (2010) ▶, 22.2% of tested dairy products were contaminated with CNS strains among which 12 strains (26.2%) contained enterotoxigenic genes. Surprisingly; the highest frequency (22%) was related to the genes producing enterotoxin A.
Several reports addressing the isolation of S. aureus encoded enterotoxin A in Iran. For example, in Tehran, the bacterium isolated from 29 (15.6%) meat samples including beef (14.8%), mutton (15%), chicken (15.7%) and turkey meat (16.6%) among which five samples encoded enterotoxin A (Sarrafzadeh Zargar et al., 2014 ▶). In another study (Havaei et al., 2015 ▶), 450 milk samples were obtained in Esfahan city (central Iran). Totally, fifty-four (12%) S. aureus were isolated and the sea and seb genes were detected in 19 and 2 isolates, respectively. Meanwhile, one isolate possessed both sea and seb genes.
All of the mentioned data suggest that animal origin products could be important reservoirs of enterotoxigenic CNS and more attention should be paid to the toxigenic capacity of these bacteria. The presence of toxins producer S. aureus localized on the skin, mucosal surface, and foodstuffs is a potential risk for food poisonings. Hence, the typing of S. aureus isolates seems to be necessary to determine the source of contamination and to identify its dominant types for better control and treatment of the resultant disease (Normanno et al., 2007 ▶). Biotyping is considered as a pattern of expressing the metabolic properties of an isolate. The biotyping approach proposed by Devriese (1984) ▶ is known as a simple and conventional procedure accepted by various researchers. This method has the potential to differentiate the source of staphylococci based on the relevant host (Kitai et al., 2005 ▶). Researchers believe that humans play a very important role in food contamination and poisoning caused by S. aureus (Aycicek et al., 2005 ▶).
In this study, the contamination of samples to HS and NHS species was 60% and 28%, respectively, and 3 isolates were not classified in the biotyping procedure. The biotyping revealed that 16% of the isolates were of the human biotype.
The findings can be compared with other similar studies in the world and Iran. For example, Normanno et al. (2007) ▶ found that, out of 125 analyzed strains among the isolates from meat and dairy products in Italy, the prevalence of the human biotype was 50.4% followed by the ovine (23.2%), bovine (7.2%), poultry-like ecovar (1.6%), and NHS strains (17.6%). In another study, CPS from pig carcasses from Swedish slaughterhouses were studied. The biotyping classified 56 isolates as NHS, 29 as human, five as poultry, one as ovine, one as bovine biotype and eight isolates were unclassified (Neskovic, 2008). In Iran, a study conducted by Soltan Dallal et al. (2010) ▶ showed that out of 100 isolates obtained from food (dairy and meat products), 29 isolates belonged to the human ecovar, 11 to the poultry ecovar, 9 to the bovine ecovar, 47 to NHS ecovars, and 4 isolates were not allocated. All the above data show that the prevalence of human ecovar in foodstuffs is high. Although some studies found no differences between the human strains and the NHS isolates regarding the ability to cause illness (Isigidi et al., 1992 ▶), the frequency of some of the severity factors is higher among the human ecovar than NHS ecovars (Soltan Dallal et al., 2010 ▶).
The high occurrence of human biotypes in the meats could be due to the manipulation of the carcass during the slaughtering process. The visceral evacuation process is a stage causing the contamination transmission via workers’ hands. Regarding the high rate of slaughterhouses contamination to human ecovar, due to more manipulation of these products, the human contamination sources are considered as sources for further contribution to human food poisoning. Particularly, some studies have highlighted the frequency of a number of factors involved in staphylococcal poisoning among the human ecovar (Soltan Dallal et al., 2010 ▶).
In Ahvaz abattoir, sheep and cattle are slaughtered in separate but adjacent saloons. Our data showed that the ovine biotypes are rarely found in cattle carcasses, which can be explained by human contamination during the slaughtering process. This type of contamination is often limited by the prevention of contamination by the hands. Also, all isolated human ecovar contained the enterotoxin A gene, which suggest a possible relationship between the ecovar and the enterotoxin gene. However, none of the ecovars contained the enterotoxin B gene. In addition, the poultry ecovar contained none of the enterotoxin genes.
The antibiotic susceptibility test on S. aureus isolates showed a high prevalence of resistance among the isolates to trimethoprim (56%) and penicillin (68%) (Table 4). Resistance to trimethoprim may be a health hazard found in more than half of the isolates. In medicine, trimethoprim is used in combination with sulfamethoxazole in a formulation called co-trimoxazole. The major clinical usage of co-trimoxazole against S. aureus is for treating cystic fibrosis patients, treatment of endocarditis and bacteremia (Foster, 2017 ▶). Although resistance to trimethoprim in Europe is low (den Heijer et al., 2013 ▶), studies report that it is widespread in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MARSA) in Africa (Nurjadi et al., 2014 ▶) and in Asia (Nurjadi et al., 2015 ▶). In a study, resistance against co-trimoxazole (85.3%) was observed in CNS recovered from broiler chicken populations in Egypt (Younis et al., 2017 ▶). Similar results (83.78%) were reported where methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolated from hospital food in Iran (Dehkordi et al., 2017 ▶). These data are consistent with the current study.
Resistance to penicillin at high levels has been reported from different countries such as Iran (Dehkordi et al., 2017 ▶), China (Wang et al., 2018 ▶), and Malaysia (Mahyudin, 2019 ▶). Also, Pereira et al. (2009) ▶ in Portugal performed an antibiotic resistance test on 148 CPS strains isolated from different food origins and showed that 73% of strains were resistant to penicillin. They reported that the virulence pattern was origin and strain dependent. In our study the HS, NHS, and bovine biotype showed high prevalence in penicillin resistance. All of the above data emphasize the need to prevent the contamination of foods to S. aureus.
The present study revealed a high rate of staphylococcal contamination in meat supplied in the area of the study. The biotyping revealed that 16% of the isolates were of the human biotype. Human contamination sources are considered as the primary sources that further contribute to human food poisoning. The meats are also contaminated with enterotoxigenic and antibiotic-resistance staphylococci, which can threaten the health of the consumers. The study showed that not only CPS contain enterotoxin A gene, CNS isolates also possess this gene in high proportions and may be potential hazards in various meats, particularly buffalo meat. Preventing meat contamination during slaughter operations and the meat supply chain by human agents as well as avoiding the consumption of undercooked meat is recommended to prevent food poisoning.
Acknowledgment
We would like to express our appreciation of the Research Council of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran, for their financial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- Adwan K. Fast DNA isolation and PCR protocols for detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Folia Microbiol. 2014;59:5–8. doi: 10.1007/s12223-013-0259-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Ashmawy MA, Sallam KI, Abd-Elghany SM, Elhadidy M, Tamura T. Prevalence, molecular characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk and dairy products. Foodborne Path. Dis. 2016;13:156–162. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2015.2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Tarazi YH, Albetar MA, Alaboudi AR. Biotyping and enterotoxigenicity of staphylococci isolated from fresh and frozen meat marketed in Jordan. Food Res. Int. 2009;42:374–379. [Google Scholar]
- Angulo FJ, Nargund VN, Chiller TC. Evidence of an association between use of anti-microbial agents in food animals and anti-microbial resistance among bacteria isolated from humans and the human health consequences of such resistance. J. Vet. Med., Series B. 2004; 51:374–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00789.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ataee RA, Karami A, Izadi M, Aghania A, Ataee MH. Molecular screening of staphylococcal enterotoxin B gene in clinical isolates. Cell J. (Yakhteh) 2011;13:187–192. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atanassova V, Meindl A, Ring C. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal enterotoxins in raw pork and uncooked smoked ham a comparison of classical culturing detection and RFLP-PCR. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001;68:105–113. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00479-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aycicek H, Cakiroglu S, Stevenson TH. Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus in ready-to-eat meals from military cafeterias in Ankara, Turkey. Food Cont. 2005;16:531–534. [Google Scholar]
- Baniardalan S, Mohammadzadeh A, Pajohi-Alamoti M, Mahmoodi P, Sadeghinasab A. Detection of toxic shock toxin (tst) gene in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine milk samples. Bulgarian J. Vet. Med. 2017;20:236–243. [Google Scholar]
- Bellio A, Chiesa F, Gallina S, Bianchi DM, Macori G, Bossi D, Decastelli L. Insight into the distribution of staphylococci and their enterotoxins in cheeses under natural conditions. Front Microbiol. 2019;9:3233. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brakstad OG, Aasbakk K, Maeland JA. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992;30:1654–1660. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1654-1660.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunha MDLRD, Rugolo LMSDS, Lopes CADM. Study of virulence factors in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from newborns. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101:661–668. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762006000600014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dastmalchi Saei H, Ahmadi M, Mardani K, Batavani RA. Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis based on polymorphism of the coagulase gene in the north west of Iran. Vet. Microbiol. 2009;137:202–206. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dehkordi FS, Gandomi H, Basti AA, Misaghi A, Rahimi E. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antibiotic resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospital food. Antimicrob. Res. Infect. Control. 2017;6:104–115. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0257-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Den Heijer CD, Van Bijnen EM, Paget WJ, Pringle M, Goossens H, Bruggeman CA, Schellevis FG, Stobberingh EE, APRES Study Team Prevalence and resistance of commensal Staphylococcus aureus including meticillin-resistant aureus in nine European countries: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013;13:409–415. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70036-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devriese LA. A simplified system for biotyping Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different animal species. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1984;56:215–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1984.tb01341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitzgerald JR, Reid SD, Ruotsalainen E, Tripp TJ, Liu M, Cole R, Kuusela P, Schlievert PM, Jarvinen A, Musser JM. Genome diversification in Staphylococcus aureus: molecular evolution of a highly variable chromosomal region encoding the staphylococcal exotoxin-like family of proteins. Infect. Immun. 2003;71:2827–2838. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2827-2838.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foster TJ. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Current status and future prospects. FEMS Microbiol. Reviews. 2017;41:430–449. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Havaei SA, Assadbeigi B, Esfahani BN, Hoseini NS, Rezaei N, Havaei SR. Detection of mecA and enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with bovine mastitis and characterization of Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) in MRSA strains. Iranian J. Microbiol. 2015;7:161–167. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hennekinne JA, De Buyser ML, Dragacci S. Staphylococcus aureus and its food poisoning toxins: characterization and outbreak investigation. FEMS Mic. Reviews. 2012;36:815–836. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00311.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huber H, Ziegler D, Pflüger V, Vogel G, Zweifel C, Stephan R. Prevalence and characteristics of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from livestock, chicken carcasses, bulk tank milk, minced meat, and contact persons. BMC Vet. Res. 2011;7:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-7-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isigidi BK, Mathieu AM, Devriese LA, Godard C, Hoof JV. Enterotoxin production in different Staphylococcus aureus biotypes isolated from food and meat plants. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1992;72:16–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb04875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jay JM, Loessner MJ, Golden DA. Staphylococcal gastroenteritis. Modern Food Microbiol. 2005;PP:545–566. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson WM, Tyler SD, Ewan EP, Ashton FE, Pollard DR, Rozee KR. Detection of genes for enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus by the polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991;29:426–430. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.426-430.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kadariya J, Smith TC, Thapaliya D. Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal food-borne disease: an ongoing challenge in public health. BioMed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2014/827965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim NH, Yun AR, Rhee MS. Prevalence and classification of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus isolated from refrigerated ready-to-eat foods (sushi, kimbab and California rolls) in Korea. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011;111:1456–1464. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05168.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitai S, Shimizu A, Kawano J, Sato E, Nakano C, Kitagawa H, Fujio K, Matsumura K, Yasuda R, Inamoto T. Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in retail raw chicken meat throughout Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2005;67:269–274. doi: 10.1292/jvms.67.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kloos WE, Bannerman TL. Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1994;7:117–140. doi: 10.1128/cmr.7.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kukhtyn MD, Horyuk YV, Horyuk VV, Yaroshenko TY, Vichko OI, Pokotylo OS. Biotype characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk and dairy products of private production in the western regions of Ukraine. Regulatory Mech. Bio. 2017;8:384–388. [Google Scholar]
- Mahyudin NA, Sahil SM, Radu S, Mahmud NK, Rashid A. Multiple drug resistance among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cutting boards of commercial food premises: A threat to food and public health safety. J. Bchem. Mic. Btech. 2019;7:48–51. [Google Scholar]
- Manjarrez López AM, Díaz Zarco S, Salazar García F, Valladares Carranza B, Gutiérrez Castillo ADC, Barbabosa Plliego A, Alavera Rojas M, Alonso Fresan MU, Velázquez Ordoñez V. Staphylococcus aureus biotypes in cows presenting subclinical mastitis from family dairy herds in the Central–Eastern State of Mexico. Rev. Mex. CiencPecu. 2012;3:265–274. [Google Scholar]
- Normanno G, La Salandra G, Dambrosio A, Quaglia NC, Corrente M, Parisi A, Santagada G, Firinu A, Crisetti E, Celano GV. Occurrence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat and dairy products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007;115:290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nurjadi D, Olalekan AO, Layer F, Shittu AO, Alabi A, Ghebremedhin B, Schaumburg F, Hofmann-Eifler J, Van Genderen PJ, Caumes E, Fleck R. Emergence of trimethoprim resistance gene dfrG in Staphylococcus aureus causing human infection and colonization in sub-saharan Africa and its import to Europe. J. Antimic. Chemother. 2014;69:2361–2368. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nurjadi D, Schäfer J, Friedrich-Jänicke B, Mueller A, Neumayr A, Calvo-Cano A, Goorhuis A, Molhoek N, Lagler H, Kantele A, Van Genderen PJ. Predominance of dfrG as determinant of trimethoprim resistance in imported Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infec. 2015;21:1095.e5–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pereira V, Lopes C, Castro A, Silva J, Gibbs P, Teixeira P. Charaecterization for entrotoxin production virulance factors, and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus is odates from various food in Portugal. Food Microbiol. 2009;26:278–282. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piette A, Verschraegen G. Role of coagulase-negative staphylococci in human disease. Vet. Microbiol. 2009;134:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Podkowik M, Park JY, Seo KS, Bystroń J, Bania J. Enterotoxigenic potential of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013;163:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rall VLM, Sforcin JM, de Deus MFR, de Sousa DC, Camargo CH, Godinho NC, Galindo LA, Soares TCS, Araujo Jr JP. Polymerase chain reaction detection of enterotoxins genes in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from Brazilian Minas cheese. Fb. Path. Dis. 2010;7:1121–1123. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarrafzadeh Zargar MH, Hosseini Doust R, Mohebati Mobarez A. Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin, A gene isolated from raw red meat and poultry in Tehran, Iran. Int. J. Enteric Pathog. 2014;2:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Soltan Dallal MMS, Salehipour Z, Eshraghi S, Mehrabadi JF, Bakhtiari R. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from meat and dairy products by PCR-RFLP. Annals Microbiol. 2010;60:189–196. [Google Scholar]
- Turchi B, Bertelloni F, Marzoli F, Cerri D, Tola S, Azara E, Longheu CM, Tassi R, Schiavo M, Cilia G, Fratini F. Coagulase negative staphylococci from ovine milk: Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of susceptibility to antibiotics, disinfectants and biofilm production. Small Rumi. Res. 2020;183 [Google Scholar]
- Vasconcelos NG, Pereira VC, Júnior JA, da Cunha MDL. Molecular detection of enterotoxins E, G, H and I in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from clinical samples of newborns in Brazil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011;111:749–762. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Veras JF, do Carmo LS, Tong LC, Shupp JW, Cummings C, dos Santos DA, Cerqueira MMOP, Cantini A, Nicoli JR, Jett M. A study of the enterotoxigenicity of coagulase-negative and coagulase-positive staphylococcal isolates from food poisoning outbreaks in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2008;12:410–415. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2007.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H, Wang H, Bai Y, Xu X, Zhou G. Pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from retailing chicken meat. LWT. 2018;90:152–156. [Google Scholar]
- Younis GA, Elkenany RM, Radwan MM, Allah MMA. Antimicrobial resistant profiles of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) recovered from broiler chicken populations in Egypt. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 2017;52:332–337. [Google Scholar]