Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2021 Jun 24;42(8):903–946. doi: 10.1002/humu.24238

Common and rare myocilin variants: Predicting glaucoma pathogenicity based on genetics, clinical and laboratory misfolding data

Hailee Scelsi 1, Brett M Barlow 1, Emily G Saccuzzo 1, Raquel L Lieberman 1,*
PMCID: PMC8295199  NIHMSID: NIHMS1711887  PMID: 34082484

Abstract

Rare variants of the olfactomedin domain of myocilin are considered causative for inherited, early-onset open angle glaucoma, with a misfolding toxic gain of function pathogenic mechanism detailed by 20 years of laboratory research. Myocilin variants are documented in the scientific literature and identified through large-scale genetic sequencing projects such as those curated in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). In the absence of key clinical and laboratory information, however, the pathogenicity of any given variant is not clear, because glaucoma is a heterogeneous and prevalent age-onset disease, and common variants are likely benign. In this review, we reevaluate the likelihood of pathogenicity for the ~100 non-synonymous missense, insertion-deletion, and premature termination myocilin olfactomedin variants documented in the literature. We integrate available clinical, laboratory cellular, biochemical and biophysical data, the olfactomedin domain structure, and population genetics data from gnomAD. Of the variants inspected, ~50% can be binned based on a preponderance of data, leaving many of uncertain pathogenicity that motivate additional studies. Ultimately, the approach of combining metrics from different disciplines will likely resolve outstanding complexities regarding the role of this misfolding-prone protein within the context of a multifactorial and prevalent ocular disease, and pave the way for new precision medicine therapeutics.

Keywords: glaucoma, Mendelian inheritance, myocilin, misfolding, endoplasmic reticulum, autosomal dominant, gnomAD, variant, mutation, pathogenesis

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1711887-f0004.jpg

Introduction

For numerous disorders, genetics studies of pedigrees have identified rare causal gene variants, and subsequent laboratory studies have contributed key knowledge of biological function, regulation, and pathogenic mechanisms used to develop new therapeutics (Chong et al., 2015). We focus here on the inherited subtype of the ocular disease glaucoma. On the whole, glaucoma is a heterogeneous age-onset neurodegenerative ocular disorder affecting ~60 million individuals, and a leading cause of irreversible blindness world-wide. Regardless of underlying etiology, in the clinic, glaucoma is characterized by optic disc cupping and decreased visual field (Weinreb, Aung, & Medeiros, 2014; Youngblood, Hauser, & Liu, 2019). Vision loss is also usually preceded by an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP), a causal yet painless risk factor. Eye pressure is maintained in anatomical region of the eye called the trabecular meshwork (TM) (Bill, 1975; Gasiorowski & Russell, 2009; Rohen, Lutjen-Drecoll, Flugel, Meyer, & Grierson, 1993). Glaucoma progression is slowed by reducing IOP through pharmacological agents and surgical techniques, but eventual optic nerve damage, retinal ganglion cell death, and vision loss, are inevitable (Kass et al., 2002).

Since 1997 (Stone et al., 1997), ophthalmologists have identified families with early onset glaucoma that segregate with rare heterozygous nonsynonymous coding mutations in the myocilin gene, MYOC (RefSeq transcript NM_000261.2, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NM_000261, 17,321 bp). Despite extensive glaucoma genetics studies for over 20 years (Fingert, Stone, Sheffield, & Alward, 2002; Liu & Allingham, 2017; Tamm, 2002), these rare MYOC variants remain the strongest genetic link to glaucoma, accounting for 1-4% of cases (Fingert, 2011; Gong, Kosoko-Lasaki, Haynatzki, & Wilson, 2004; Resch & Fautsch, 2009) of the most common glaucoma subtype primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (Tham et al., 2014; Wiggs & Pasquale, 2017; Youngblood et al., 2019), and 4-30% of juvenile-onset open angle glaucoma (JOAG) cases (Resch & Fautsch, 2009). Available data converge on the pathogenic mechanism by which myocilin variants acquire a toxic gain of function (GOF), which hastens the onset of glaucoma (see below). It is not yet known to what extent understanding myocilin-associated glaucoma pathogenesis might inform sporadic cases of glaucoma, but given precedents from other diseases (Blauwendraat, Nalls, & Singleton, 2020; Kathiresan & Srivastava, 2012; Mathis, Goizet, Soulages, Vallat, & Masson, 2019) and the fact that mutant myocilin dysfunction is localized to the TM tissue whose dysfunction is associated with most forms of glaucoma (Rohen et al., 1993), it likely that at least some molecular insights will be transferrable and lead to new therapeutic directions.

The MYOC gene encodes a ~55 kDa polypeptide chain composed of three exons that encode a modular protein with two multimerization domains, namely, a coiled-coil (Gobeil, Letartre, & Raymond, 2006) and a specialized coiled-coil called a leucine-zipper (Kubota et al., 1997; Resch & Fautsch, 2009) plus a 31 kDa olfactomedin (OLF) domain (Fig. 1A). OLF houses over 90% of reported mutations (Fingert et al., 2002; Hewitt, Mackey, & Craig, 2008; Resch & Fautsch, 2009), which are distributed throughout the sequence and structure, and is the focus of the variants reviewed here. Our working model of the supramolecular structure based on biophysical experiments and structural data (Donegan et al., 2015; Hill et al., 2017) involves the coiled-coil forming a tetramer, which diverges into two pairs of leucine-zipper dimers that in turn connect to two pairs of OLF domains by a ~60 residue, yet-uncharacterized linker (Fig. 1B). Myocilin is expressed in the TM, other eye tissues, and other neuromuscular and skeletal tissues (Kulkarni, Karavanich, Atchley, & Anholt, 2000), and is known to be upregulated upon steroid treatment (Polansky et al., 1997). No bona fide interacting partners or particular function has been established for wild-type (WT) myocilin.

Figure 1. Myocilin gene structure and supramolecular arrangement.

Figure 1.

(A) Modular gene structure showing signal peptide (SP), coiled coil (CC), leucine zipper (LZ), linker regions, and OLF domain. Five Cys residues participate in intermolecular disulfide bonds. Cys47 and Cys61 within CC stabilize the tetrameric by forming disulfide bonds with corresponding residues on other protomers, as observed biochemically; Cys185 in LZ stabilizes a dimer with another protomer, observed crystallographically; and Cys245 is disulfide bonded to Cys433 within the OLF domain, also observed crystallographically. (B) Supramolecular arrangement based on biochemical and biophysical studies. The N-terminal CC domain is a tetramer, which separates into two LZ dimers, which connect to the OLF propellers via a predicted unstructured linker.

Large-scale genotyping datasets have identified new variants of Mendelian disease-associated genes, including MYOC. The lack of clinical data on individuals and their relatives to establish a pattern of heritability for all known gene variants of myocilin confounds the interpretation of myocilin variations and their relationship to glaucoma, however. Most of the disease-causing MYOC alleles are very rare and are therefore not necessarily represented in databases such as the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; https://gnomAD.broadinstitute.org/) (Karczewski et al., 2020). For myocilin variants described in both gnomAD and in clinical literature, significant ambiguity arises regarding the contribution of the mutation to glaucoma.

Here we review approximately 100 missense, insertion-deletion (indel), and premature termination variants of myocilin with literature precedent and sort them into for likelihood of pathogenicity (Table 1, Table 2, Supp. Table S1, Supp. Table S2). At the time of the writing of this review, gnomAD lists 155 variants in the myocilin olfactomedin (OLF) domain including 114 (Supp. Table S3) of unknown pathogenicity that are not described in the clinical literature. Compared to prior review articles (Cheng et al., 2012; Fingert et al., 2002; Gong et al., 2004; H. Wang et al., 2019) and databases (Hewitt et al., 2008; Rangachari et al., 2019) that focus on clinical or biochemical aspects myocilin variants of myocilin, we have taken a holistic approach: we consider available clinical metrics, related statistical analyses, as well as biological, cellular and biochemical behavior, and atomic-detail inferences from the OLF structure. We present the challenges in differentiating glaucoma variants from non-disease variants in this multifactorial disease and suggest paths forward to resolve ambiguities.

Table 1.

Categories of and Criteria for Myocilin (Refseq NM_000261.2) Variants

Category Supporting information List of variants
Clinical data
Laboratory data
Structure
Benign High prevalence in gnomAD (allele count >50, allele frequency >2e-4). Ample clinical information, laboratory data, and insights from structure. p.Thr293Lys, p.Val329Met, p.Glu352Lys, p.Thr353Ile, p.Lys398Arg, p.Ala445Val, p.Lys500Arg
Pathogenic Early onset, familial POAG or JOAG. Literature reports often include IOP values and cup-disc ratios. Support for a misfolding phenotype includes extent of secretion, solubility of intracellular aggregates in detergent, and/or thermal destabilization of isolated OLF domain variant Intuition based on effects of mutation on local structure suggests perturbation leading to destabilization and aggregation p.Cys245Tyr, p.Gly246Arg, p.Gly252Arg, p.Arg272Gly, p.Glu323Lys, p.Gly364Val, p.Gly367Arg, p.Gly367_Gln368delinsVal, p.Pro370Leu, p.Thr377Met, p.Thr377Lys, p.Asp380Ala, p.Lys423Glu, p.Val426Phe, p.Cys433Arg, p.Tyr437His, p.Ile477Asn, p.Ile477Ser, p.Tyr479His, p.Asn480Lys, p.Pro481Leu, p.Pro481Thr, p.Ile499Phe, p.Ile499Ser, p.Ser502Pro
Likely Pathogenic Supports early onset, familial POAG or JOAG, not necessarily including explicit age of diagnosis, IOP values, and/or cup-disc ratios. Incomplete or missing support for a misfolding phenotype Intuition based on effects of mutation on local structure suggests perturbation leading to destabilization and aggregation p.Val251Ala, p.Pro254Arg, p.Leu255Pro, p.Pro274Arg, p.Gln337Arg, p.Ser341Pro, p.Ala363Thr, p.Phe369Leu, p.Tyr371Asp, p.Thr377Arg, p.Asp380His, p.Asp384Gly, p.Glu385Lys, p.Thr438Ile, p.Asn450Tyr, p.Leu486Phe
Uncertain Significance– Lean Pathogenic POAG association, but not necessarily Mendelian inheritance patterns and/or early onset diagnosis May be absent Intuition based on effects of mutation on local structure suggests perturbation leading to destabilization and aggregation p.Gly244Val, p.Thr285Met, p.Trp286Arg, p.Glu300Lys, p.Gly326Ser, p.Leu334Pro, p.Ile360Asn, p.Asp378Gly, p.Asp384Asn, p.Gly387Asp, p.Ser393Arg, p.Asp395_Glu396insAspPro, p.Glu396DUP, Gly399Asp, p.Gly399Val, p.Ser425Pro, p.Phe430Leu, p.Thr448Pro, p.Arg470Cys
Uncertain Significance—Lean Benign Identified in a control group or glaucoma onset significantly later than age 40 Where present, do not indicate a strong misfolding phenotype Intuition based on effects of mutation on local structure suggests these are conservative substitutions unlikely to appreciably affect OLF structure and stability p.Thr256Met, p.Glu261Lys, p.Ile288Met, p.Thr290Ala, p.Arg296Cys, p.Gln297His, p.Leu303Ile, p.Ser313Phe, p.Ser331Thr, p.Ser333Cys, p.Arg342Lys, p.Ile345Met, p.Pro361Ser, p.Gly374Val, p.Val402Ile, p.Glu414Lys, p.Thr419Ala, p.Arg422Cys, p.Ala427Thr, p.Asn428Ser, p.Gly434Ser, p.Asp446Tyr, p.Ala447Thr, p.Ile465Met, p.Tyr471Cys, p.Tyr473Cys, p.Met476Arg, p.Val495Ile
Uncertain Significance—Premature termination Identified in control group or glaucoma onset significantly later than age 40 Where present, misfolding phenotype OLF domain is not fully translated so it cannot adopt a native structure p.Gln337Rfs*9, p.Gly362Efs*45, p.Gln368*, p.Trp373*, p.Tyr453Mfs*11, p.Glu483*, p.Trp489Cfs*10

Table 2.

Summary of data for mOLF-resident myocilin (Refseq NM_000261.2) variants predicted to be benign, pathogenic, or likely pathogenic.

 A. Benign
Variant Clinical Data Cell Assaysa Thermal Stability Structure Analysis Additional Variants Other

p.Thr293Lys
c.878C>A
Diagnosis
● POAG (Alward et al., 1998; Alward et al., 2002; Ennis et al., 2010; Faucher et al., 2002; Fingert et al., 1999; Millá et al., 2013; Williams-Lyn et al., 2000)
● Exfoliation Syndrome (Alward et al., 2002)
● NTG (Weisschuh, Neumann, Wolf, Wissinger, & Gramer, 2005)
● OHT (Faucher et al., 2002)
● PACG (X. Huang et al., 2014)
● Control Group (Faucher et al., 2002)
Country/Ethnicity
● German
● Spanish
● Caucasian
● African American
● Chinese
● English
● Canadian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Millá et al., 2013)
● No (Ennis et al., 2010; Faucher et al., 2002; X. Huang et al., 2014; Williams-Lyn et al., 2000)
gnomAD?
● Allele count 157, allele frequency 5.6e-4
 ● European, Ashkenazi, Latino
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil, Letartre, & Raymond, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● n/a
● WT-like
 ○ Tm=52.9 °C (Donegan et al., 2015)
Location
● Surface exposed
● Internal loop of Blade C

Interactions
● None

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Tolerated
● p.Thr293Met (c.878C>T)
 ○ gnomAD: Allele count 3, allele frequency 1.21e-5
 ○ Tolerated
● p.Thr293Ala (c.877A>G)
 ○ gnomAD: Allele count 1, allele frequency 4.02e-6
 ○ Tolerated
n/a
p.Val329Met
c.985G>A
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Svidnicki et al., 2018)
● POAG (Fingert et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2012; Shimizu et al., 2000)
● Control Group (Fingert et al., 1999)
Country/Ethnicity
● African American
● Brazilian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Shimizu et al., 2000)
● gnomAD?
● Allele count 72, allele frequency 2.55e-4
 ○ African/African American
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Soluble(Shimizu et al., 2000)
● Slightly destabilized, mouse WT-like (Patterson-Orazem et al., 2019)
 ○ Tm=49.6 °C (Donegan et al., 2015)
Location
● Buried
● Innermost strand of Blade B

Interactions
● Hydrophobic pocket with Blade A

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Tolerated, rearrangement likely
● Met is residue in D. rerio myocilin
n/a n/a
p.Glu352Lys
c.1054G>A
Diagnosis
● POAG (Alward et al., 1998; Faucher et al., 2002; Fingert et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2012; Whigham et al., 2011; Williams-Lyn et al., 2000)
● Control Group (Alward et al., 1998; Fingert et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2012; Svidnicki et al., 2018; Whigham et al., 2011)
● PCG (Millá et al., 2013)
Country/Ethnicity
● Caucasian
● African American
● African Caribbean
● Canadian
● Black South African
● Spanish
● Brazilian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Williams-Lyn et al., 2000)
● No (Faucher et al., 2002; Williams-Lyn et al., 2000)
gnomAD?
● Allele count 337, allele frequency 1.19e-3
 ○ African/African American
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Soluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
● Insoluble (Shimizu et al., 2000)
● WT-like based on Glu352Gln (Burns, Turnage, Walker, & Lieberman, 2011) Location
● Surface exposed
● Exterior loop of Blade B

Interactions
● None

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Tolerated
n/a n/a
p.Thr353Ile
c.1058C>T
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Bhattacharjee et al., 2007; Lam et al., 2000; Park et al., 2016; Rose et al., 2011)
● POAG (Banerjee, Bhattacharjee, Ponda, Sen, & Ray, 2012; B. Fan et al., 2002; B. J. Fan et al., 2005; Fingert et al., 1999; Jia, Tam, et al., 2009; Lam et al., 2000; Pang et al., 2002; Yoon, Kim, Moon, Lim, & Joo, 1999; X. M. Zhou et al., 2013)
● NTG (B. J. Fan et al., 2005)
● PACG (Aung et al., 2005)
● Control Group(Aung et al., 2005; B. Fan et al., 2002; B. J. Fan et al., 2005; Lam et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2012; Pang et al., 2002)
Country/Ethnicity
● Korean
● Japanese
● Chinese
● Indian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (B. Fan et al., 2002; Park et al., 2016; Rose et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 1999; X. M. Zhou et al., 2013)
● No (Bhattacharjee et al., 2007)
gnomAD?
● Allele count 191, allele frequency 6.75e-4
 ○ Asian
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
WT-like
 ○ Tm=53.1 °C (Donegan et al., 2015)
Location
● Surface exposed, outer strand of Blade B

Interactions
● Thr351 side chain, solvent

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Tolerated
n/a ● Homozygous carrier had more severe symptoms than heterozygous family members (Yoon et al., 1999)
● Individual heterozygous for Thr353Ile and Asp384Asn had more severe symptoms than father with only Thr353Ile (X. M. Zhou et al., 2013)
● One individual heterozygous for Thr353Ile and Asn480Lys (Rose et al., 2011)
p.Lys398Arg
c.1193G>A
Diagnosis
● POAG (Alward et al., 1998; Alward et al., 2002; Fingert et al., 1999; Hulsman et al., 2002; Jansson, Marknell, Tomic, Larsson, & Wadelius, 2003; Liu et al., 2012; McDonald et al., 2010; O’Gorman et al., 2019; Rakhmanov et al., 2005; Vázquez, Herrero, Bastús, & Pérez, 2009; Vincent et al., 2002; Williams-Lyn et al., 2000)
● Control Group (Alward et al., 1998; Fingert et al., 1999; Hulsman et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2012; Vázquez et al., 2009)
● Exfoliative glaucoma (Jansson et al., 2003)
● Pigmentary glaucoma (Alward et al., 1998; Alward et al., 2002; Fingert et al., 1999)
Country/Ethnicity
● Russian
● Mexican
● Dutch
● Swedish
● English/Scottish
● Canadian
● Spanish
● UK
 ○ African American
● Australian
● Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
 ○ n/a
gnomAD?
● Allele count 992, allele frequency 3.51e-3
● European
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006; Jacobson et al., 2001)
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Soluble (Shimizu et al., 2000; Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
WT-like
 ○ Tm=53.8 °C (Burns et al., 2011)
Location
● Surface exposed, loop connecting inner strands of Blade C

Interactions
● None

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Tolerated
n/a n/a
p.Ala445Val
c.1334C>T
Diagnosis
● POAG (Alward et al., 1998; Faucher et al., 2002; Fingert et al., 1999; Lopez-Martinez et al., 2007)
● NTG (Weisschuh et al., 2005)
● Pigmentary glaucoma (Faucher et al., 2002)
● OHT (Vincent et al., 2002)
Country/Ethnicity
● German
● Canadian
● French-Canadian
● Spanish
● Australian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Vincent et al., 2002)
● No (Faucher et al., 2002)
gnomAD?
● Allele count 57, allele frequency 2.01e-4
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
● WT-like
 ○ Tm=54.2 °C (Burns et al., 2011)
Location
● Surface exposed, on loop connecting inner strands of Blade D

Interactions
● Thr443

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Tolerated
n/a n/a
p.Lys500Arg
c.1499A>G
Diagnosis
● POAG (Alward et al., 1998; Fingert et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2012; Whigham et al., 2011; Williams, Carmichael, Wainstein, Hobbs, & Ramsay, 2015; Williams-Lyn et al., 2000)
● Control (Liu et al., 2012)
Country/Ethnicity
 ○ African American
● Black South African

Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Williams et al., 2015)
gnomAD?
● Allele count 161, allele frequency 5.69e-4
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● n/a
n/a Location
● C-terminal strand within molecular clasp of Blade E, surface exposed

Interactions
● None

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Tolerated
p.Lys500Thr (c.1499A>C)
● gnomAD: Allele count 1, allele frequency 3.98e-6
● Tolerated in structure
One control individual was compound heterozygous for p.Lys500Arg and p.Asp446Tyr (Liu et al., 2012)

 B. Pathogenic
Variant Clinical Data Cell Assays Thermal Stability Structure Analysis Additional Variants Other

p.Cys245Tyr
c.734G>A
Diagnosis
● JOAG (B. J. Fan et al., 2006)
● OHT (B. J. Fan et al., 2006)
Country/Ethnicity
● Chinese
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (B. J. Fan et al., 2006)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Hogewind et al., 2007)
 ○ 0.28% of WT (Zadoo, Nguyen, Zode, & Hulleman, 2016)

● 30 °C
 ○ −/+ (Zadoo et al., 2016)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Hogewind et al., 2007; Yam, Gaplovska-Kysela, Zuber, & Roth, 2007)
● Partially insoluble (Jia, Gong, et al., 2009)
Likely destabilized
 ○ n/a (but see Cys433Arg)
Location
● Blade E, molecular clasp, surface exposed

Interactions
● Disulfide bonded to Cys433

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious
n/a n/a
p.Gly246Arg
c.736G>A
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Adam et al., 1997; Brézin et al., 1997)
Country/Ethnicity
● French
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Adam et al., 1997; Brézin et al., 1997)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
 ○ 0.47% of WT (Zadoo et al., 2016)
● 30 °C
 ○ ++ (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006; Zadoo et al., 2016)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
Destabilized
 ○ Tm=~42.6 °C (Burns et al., 2011; Donegan, Hill, Turnage, Orwig, & Lieberman, 2012)
Location
● Blade E, molecular clasp, surface exposed

Interactions
● None

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, charged side chain like Arg would interfere with proper positioning of Cys245 for disulfide bond formation
n/a n/a
p.Gly252Arg
c.754G>A
Diagnosis
● POAG (Hewitt et al., 2007)
● JOAG (Booth et al., 2000; Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000; Vincent et al., 2002; Willoughby et al., 2004)
● OHT (Hewitt et al., 2007)
Country/Ethnicity
● Australian
● Chinese
● Scottish
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Booth et al., 2000; Hewitt et al., 2007; Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000; Vincent et al., 2002)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
● – (Gobeil et al., 2006)

● 30 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble(Shimizu et al., 2000)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm=44.8 °C (Burns et al., 2011) or 43.0 °C (Donegan et al., 2012), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade E, molecular clasp, surface exposed

Interactions
● Main chain NH H-bonded to carbonyl of Asp498

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, Arg would clash with neighboring Glu253 and Trp250, causing destabilization of the molecular clasp
● p.Gly252Glu (c.755G>A)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 2, allele frequency 8.25e-6
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● p.Gly252Ala (c.755G>C)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 3, allele frequency 1.15e-5
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● One individual compound heterozygous for Gly252Arg and Gly244Val (Hewitt et al., 2007)
● One individual also heterozygous for OPTN mutation (Willoughby et al., 2004)
p.Arg272Gly
c.814C>G
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Shimizu et al., 2000)
● POAG (Shimizu et al., 2000)
Country/Ethnicity
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Shimizu et al., 2000)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)

● 30 °C
 ○ ++ (Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Shimizu et al., 2000)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm=44.7 °C (Burns et al., 2011) or 41 °C (Donegan et al., 2012), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade A, innermost β-strand, near bottom face, not solvent exposed

Interactions
● Sidechain guanidinium group forms multiple stabilizing interactions with Glu483 on Blade E, and Thr285 on the adjacent β-strand of Blade A

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, removal of side chain interactions
● p.Arg272Gln (c.815G>A)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 2, allele frequency 8.01e-6
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● p.Arg272* (c.814C>T)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 2, allele frequency 8.02e-6
 ○ Uncertain
n/a
p.Glu323Lys
c.967G>A
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000)
● POAG (Shimizu et al., 2000)
Country/Ethnicity
● Panamanian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)/+(Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Shimizu et al., 2000; Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)

Destabilized
 ○ Tm=44 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 45.6 °C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Loop connecting Blade A to Blade B, top face, but not surface exposed

Interactions
● Main chain NH forms H-bonding interaction with carbonyl of Gln337
● Side chain forms polar contact with NH Glu340

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, charge inversion
● p.Glu323_Val329dup (c.967_987dup)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 1, allele frequency 3.98e-6
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
n/a
p.Gly364Val
c.1091G>T
Diagnosis
● POAG (Alward et al., 1998; Fingert et al., 1999; Stone et al., 1997)
Country/Ethnicity
● US
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes(Stone et al., 1997)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)/++ (Jacobson et al., 2001; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006; Jacobson et al., 2001; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Partially insoluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm=~45 °C (Burns et al., 2011; Donegan et al., 2012)
Location
● Long loop connecting Blade B to Blade C, surface exposed

Interactions
● Main chain NH forms H-bonding interaction with carbonyl of Ser393

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, steric clash with Gln368 and Phe369
● p.Gly364Ser (c.1090G>A)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 2, allele frequency 7.95e-6
● Likely deleterious to structure
● Adenovirus-injected myocilinG364V into mouse eyes led to significant IOP elevation (Shepard et al., 2007)
p.Gly367Arg
c.1099G>A
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Cobb et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2020; Iliev et al., 2008; Kanagavalli, Krishnadas, Pandaranayaka, Krishnaswamy, & Sundaresan, 2003; Souzeau et al., 2015; Vincent et al., 2002; Yao et al., 2018)
● POAG (J. Chen et al., 2011; Faucher et al., 2002; Mansergh et al., 1998; Melki, Belmouden, Brezin, & Garchon, 2003; K. G. Michels-Rautenstrauss et al., 1998; Suzuki et al., 1997; Fumiko Taniguchi, Suzuki, Shirato, & Araie, 2000)
Country/Ethnicity
● Japanese
● German
● Irish
● Indian
● Swiss
● Australian
● Scottish
● Chinese
● French
● Canadian
● Italian/French
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (J. Chen et al., 2011; Cobb et al., 2002; Faucher et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2020; Iliev et al., 2008; Mansergh et al., 1998; K. G. Michels-Rautenstrauss et al., 1998; Souzeau et al., 2015; Fumiko Taniguchi et al., 2000; Vincent et al., 2002; Yao et al., 2018)
● No (Gupta et al., 2020; Kanagavalli et al., 2003)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Kanagavalli, Pandaranayaka, Krishnadas, Krishnaswamy, & Sundaresan, 2007)
● 30 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
Destabilized
 ○ Tm= 42.7 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 45.7 °C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Long loop connecting Blade B to Blade C, surface exposed

Interactions
● Main chain NH forms polar contact with side chain of Asp378

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, large size of arginine would be sterically incompatible with neighboring Tyr376, which forms a solvent-exposed π-π stacking interaction with His366
See p.Gly367_Gln368delinsVal n/a
p.Gly367_Gln368delinsVal
c.1101_1103delGACAinsT
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Angius, De Gioia, et al., 1998; Angius, Pisano, et al., 1998)
● POAG (Angius, De Gioia, et al., 1998; Angius, Pisano, et al., 1998)
Country/Ethnicity
● Italian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Angius, De Gioia, et al., 1998; Angius, Pisano, et al., 1998)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
● + (Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
n/a Location
● Long loop connecting Blade B to Blade C, surface exposed

Interactions
● Main chain NH forms polar contact with side chain of Asp378

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, changes to this loop are generally problematic
See p.Gly367Arg n/a
p.Pro370Leu
c.1109C>T
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Adam et al., 1997; Bayat et al., 2008; Campos-Mollo et al., 2007; X. Chen et al., 2009; Y. Chen, Jiang, Wan, Yu, & Sun, 2006; Damji et al., 1999; Hamanaka et al., 2017; C. Huang et al., 2018; X. Huang et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014; Mukhopadhyay et al., 2002; Rose et al., 2011; Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000; Stoilova et al., 1998; Suzuki et al., 1997; Svidnicki et al., 2018; F. Taniguchi, 1999; Vasconcellos et al., 2000; Vincent et al., 2002; Wei et al., 2011; Wiggs et al., 1998)
● POAG (Wei et al., 2005)
Country/Ethnicity
● Colombian
● Chinese
● Iranian
● Japanese
● French-Canadian
● Canadian
● Indian
● Brazilian
● Greek
● French
● US
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Adam et al., 1997; Campos-Mollo et al., 2007; X. Chen et al., 2009; Y. Chen et al., 2006; Damji et al., 1999; Hamanaka et al., 2017; X. Huang et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014; Mukhopadhyay et al., 2002; Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000; Stoilova et al., 1998; Suzuki et al., 1997; F. Taniguchi, 1999; Vincent et al., 2002; Wei et al., 2005; Wei et al., 2011; Wiggs et al., 1998)
● No (Bayat et al., 2008)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006; Yam et al., 2007)
● 30 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Shimizu et al., 2000; Yam et al., 2007; Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
● Could not be isolated in folded state for measurement (Burns et al., 2011)
● When combined with stabilizing variant D478S to yield OLFP370L/D478S, Tm = 47°C compared to OLFD478S alone, which is 58 °C (Hill et al., 2019)
Location
● Long loop connecting Blade B to Blade C, surface exposed

Interactions
● None

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, adjacent to Tyr371, likely Pro likely properly organizes this region to promote the interaction between the backbone carbonyl of Phe369 and Nε of Lys423, and orient Tyr371 for cation-π
● p.Pro370Ser (c.1108C>T)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 1, allele frequency 3.19e-5
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure

● Often serves as a “positive control” for pathogenic variants
● MyocilinP370L accumulates in the ER(Lopez-Martinez et al., 2007)
● MyocilinP370L downregulates homeostatic ER-stress response (L. Wang et al., 2007)
● MyocilinP370L impairs mitochondrial function (decreased transmembrane potential, increased ROS production, increased intracellular cytoplasm) (He, Leung, Zhuo, & Ge, 2009)
● Detailed histochemical analysis (Hamanaka et al., 2017)
p.Thr377Met
c.1130C>T
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Puska, Lemmela, Kristo, Sankila, & Jarvela, 2005; Shimizu et al., 2000; Young et al., 2012; Zgaga et al., 2008)
● POAG (Allingham et al., 1998; Alward et al., 1998; Fingert et al., 1999; Hamanaka et al., 2017; Kanagavalli et al., 2003; Kitsos et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2012; Mackey et al., 2003; Melki, Idhajji, et al., 2003; Petersen et al., 2006; Puska et al., 2005; Shimizu et al., 2000; Wiggs et al., 1998; Wilkinson et al., 2003; Wirtz et al., 2008)
● NTG (Mackey et al., 2003; Puska et al., 2005; Wilkinson et al., 2003)
● OHT (Hamanaka et al., 2017; Kitsos et al., 2010; Mackey et al., 2003; Petersen et al., 2006; Puska et al., 2005; Wilkinson et al., 2003; Wirtz et al., 2008)
Country/Ethnicity
● Croatian
● US
● US/Caucasian
● Indian
● Australian
 ○ African American
● Finnish
● Greek
● Dutch/Croatian
● English
● Greek/Macedonian
● Japanese
● Moroccan
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes(Allingham et al., 1998; Alward et al., 1998; Hamanaka et al., 2017; Kanagavalli et al., 2003; Kitsos et al., 2010; Mackey et al., 2003; Petersen et al., 2006; Puska et al., 2005; Shimizu et al., 2000; Wiggs et al., 1998; Wilkinson et al., 2003; Wirtz et al., 2008; Young et al., 2012; Zgaga et al., 2008)
gnomAD?
● Allele count 5, allele frequency 1.99e-5
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
● + (Gobeil et al., 2006)/++ (Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Partially insoluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
● Insoluble (Shimizu et al., 2000)
Destabilized
● Tm = 44.3 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 47.7°C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Long loop connecting Blade B to Blade C

Interactions
● Main chain carbonyl makes polar contact with Nε of Lys423
● Side chain makes polar contacts with Gly374 carbonyl and main chain NH of Tyr371

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, loss of numerous polar interactions would propagate to weaken cation-π and metal ion site
● p.Thr377Lys (c.1130C>A) (Vincent et al., 2002)
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● p.Thr377Arg (c.1130C>G) (Waryah, Narsani, Sheikh, Shaikh, & Shahani, 2013)
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● p.Thr377Ala (c.1129A>G)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 2, allele frequency 7.96e-6
 ○ Uncertain
● Detailed histochemical analysis (Hamanaka et al., 2017)
● Four family members compound heterozygous for p.Thr377Met and p.Gln368* have higher IOP than family members with only p.Gln368* (Young et al., 2012)
● Two family members compound heterozygotes for p.Thr377Met and p.Val495Ile (Alward et al., 1998)
p.Asp380Ala
c.1139A>C
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Campos-Mollo et al., 2007; Kennan et al., 1998; Stoilova et al., 1998)
Country/Ethnicity
● Spanish
● English
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Campos-Mollo et al., 2007; Kennan et al., 1998; Stoilova et al., 1998)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)/+(Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ ++ (Gobeil et al., 2006)/+++ (Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Partially insoluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
● Tm = ~46.6 °C (Burns et al., 2011; Donegan et al., 2012)
Location
● Innermost strand, Blade C

Interactions
● Ca2+, Na+, Tyr371

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, loss of ionic interactions
● p.Asp380Gly (c.1139A>G) (Alward et al., 1998)
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● p.Asp380His (c.1138G>C) (Wirtz, Samples, Choi, & Gaudette, 2007)
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● p.Asp380Asn (c.1138G>A) (Challa et al., 2002)
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● Aggregation of OLFD380A is facile at 37 °C, pH 7.2 (Hill, Donegan, & Lieberman, 2014)
p.Lys423Glu
c.1267A>G
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Bruttini et al., 2003; Faucher et al., 2002; Morissette et al., 1998; Svidnicki et al., 2018)
● POAG (Bruttini et al., 2003; Morissette et al., 1998)
● OHT (Morissette et al., 1998)
Country/Ethnicity
● Brazilian
● Italian
● French-Canadian
● Canadian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Bruttini et al., 2003; Faucher et al., 2002; Morissette et al., 1998)
● No (Faucher et al., 2002)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Jacobson et al., 2001; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
● 34.2 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 40.5 °C (Burns et al., 2011)
Location
● On loop connecting Blade C to Blade D

Interactions
● Internal cation-π with Tyr371

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, charge inversion internal to protein
n/a ● In family, 4 homozygotes had no symptoms while heterozygotes did have JOAG/POAG (Morissette et al., 1998)
p.Val426Phe
c.1276G>T
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Lim, Lichter, Higashi, Downs, & Richards, 2003; Mansergh et al., 1998; Millá et al., 2013; Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000)
● POAG (Shimizu et al., 2000)
Country/Ethnicity
● Spanish
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Lim et al., 2003; Mansergh et al., 1998; Millá et al., 2013; Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ ++ (Vollrath & Liu, 2006)/+++ (Gobeil et al., 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Shimizu et al., 2000; Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm= 41.5 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 45.1 °C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● On loop connecting Blade C to Blade D

Interactions
● Hydrophobic between Blades C and D

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, would weaken or disrupt the neighboring cation-π interaction between Lys423 and Tyr371 (see Lys423)
n/a n/a
p.Cys433Arg
c.1297T>C
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Povoa, Malta, Rezende Mde, de Melo, & Giannella-Neto, 2006; Svidnicki et al., 2018; Vasconcellos et al., 2000)
● POAG (Povoa et al., 2006)
● OHT (Povoa et al., 2006)
Country/Ethnicity
● Brazilian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Povoa et al., 2006; Vasconcellos et al., 2000)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
Destabilized
 ○ Tm=40.4 °C (Burns et al., 2011) or 42.6 °C (Donegan et al., 2012), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade D, β-turn connecting two inner strands on bottom face

Interactions
● Disulfide with Cys245, and NH fmors interaction with Glu385; Glu385Ala is misfolded (Donegan et al., 2012)

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, loss of covalent disulfide bond and interacting with Glu385
n/a n/a
p.Tyr437His
c.1309T>C
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Alward et al., 2002; Lei, Li, Liu, & Zhang, 2019; Wiggs et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2020)
● POAG (Alward et al., 1998; Alward et al., 2002; Fingert et al., 1999; Lei et al., 2019; Stone et al., 1997)
● OHT (Lei et al., 2019)
Country/Ethnicity
● Chinese
● US
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Alward et al., 1998; Lei et al., 2019; Stone et al., 1997; Wiggs et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2020)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Jacobson et al., 2001; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
 ○ 0.2% of WT (Zadoo et al., 2016)
● 30 °C
 ○ −/+ (Vollrath & Liu, 2006; Zadoo et al., 2016)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Hogewind et al., 2007; Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm=40.3 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 41.4 °C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade D, near disulfide bond

Interactions
● Side chain forms H-bonding interaction with NH of Leu248 in Blade E

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, His is too small to form inter-blade interaction
n/a ● Detailed histochemical comparison between human donor eyes expressing myocilinY437H or myocilinWT (van der Heide et al., 2018)
● Mouse models with different genetic backgrounds have differing phenotypes (Chou, Tomarev, & Porciatti, 2014; Gould et al., 2006; Joe, Nakaya, Abu-Asab, & Tomarev, 2015; Kasetti, Phan, Millar, & Zode, 2016; Lynch et al., 2018; McDowell et al., 2012; Senatorov et al., 2006; Shepard et al., 2007; Zhuo et al., 2008; Zillig, Wurm, Grehn, Russell, & Tamm, 2005; Zode et al., 2011)
● Aggregated OLFY437H has amyloid character (Orwig et al., 2012)
p.Ile477Asn
c.1430T>A
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Richards, 1998; Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000)
● POAG (Alward et al., 1998; Fingert et al., 1999; Shimizu et al., 2000)
● Country/Ethnicity
● US
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Alward et al., 1998; Richards, 1998; Rozsa et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2000; Stokes, 1940)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Shimizu et al., 2000; Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm=37.7 °C (Burns et al., 2011) or 39.7 °C (Donegan et al., 2012), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade E, innermost strand, part of hydrophobic belt

Interactions
● Side chain hydrophobic packing, main chain carbonyl is ligand to Ca2+

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, new polarity in hydrophobic environment
See p.Ile477Ser n/a
p.Ile477Ser
c.1430T>G
Diagnosis
● POAG (Adam et al., 1997)
Country/Ethnicity
● French
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Adam et al., 1997)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Izumi et al., 2003; Jacobson et al., 2001; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ +++ (Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm = 40.1 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 41.9 °C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade E, innermost strand, part of hydrophobic belt

Interactions
● Side chain hydrophobic packing, main chain carbonyl is ligand to Ca2+

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, new polarity in hydrophobic environment
See p.Ile477Asn n/a
p.Tyr479His
c.1435T>C
Diagnosis
● POAG (Lopez-Martinez et al., 2007; Millá et al., 2013)
Country/Ethnicity
● Spanish
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Millá et al., 2013)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ −/+ (Lopez-Martinez et al., 2007)
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
n/a Location
● Blade E, innermost strand, near bottom face

Interactions
● Tyr479 side chain forms short (2.6 Å) H-bonding interaction with Glu385, located on Blade C, otherwise in hydrophobic environment

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, His is too small to form interaction with Glu385, and Glu385Ala is misfolded (Donegan et al., 2012), indicating the H-bonding interaction is important.
n/a ● MyocilinY479H accumulates in ER (Lopez-Martinez et al., 2007)
p.Asn480Lys
c.1440C>A,G
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Brézin et al., 1998; Mimivati, Nurliza, Marini, & Liza-Sharmini, 2014; Rose et al., 2011)
● POAG (Adam et al., 1997; Brézin et al., 1998; Guevara-Fujita et al., 2008; Hulsman et al., 2002; Melki, Belmouden, et al., 2003)
Country/Ethnicity
● Andean
● Malay
● French
● Dutch
● Indian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Adam et al., 1997; Brézin et al., 1998; Guevara-Fujita et al., 2008; Hulsman et al., 2002; Mimivati et al., 2014; Rose et al., 2011)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
● – (Gobeil et al., 2006)/+(Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
● + (Gobeil et al., 2006)/++(Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm=42.4 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 46.1 °C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade E, on β-turn between internal strands, side chain buried

Interactions
● Asn480 side chain forms polar interactions with main chain NH of Leu483 and Glu483

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, buried point charge unfavorable
n/a ● One individual is compound heterozygous for Asn480Lys and Thr353Ile (Rose et al., 2011)
p.Pro481Thr
c.1441C>A
Diagnosis
● POAG (Fingert et al., 1999)
● JOAG (Alward et al., 2002)
Country/Ethnicity
● US
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
 ○ n/a
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
Location
● Blade E, on β-turn between internal strands, side chain buried

Interactions
● Pro481 forms H-bonding interaction to Lys484 Nε in same loop

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, removal of constraint within β-turn
● See p.Pro481Leu
● p.Pro481Arg (c.1442C>G) (Jansson et al., 2003)
● Likely deleterious to structure
● p.Pro481Ser (c.1441C>T) (Mabuchi et al., 2001)
● gnomAD: allele count 1, frequency 3.98e-6
● Uncertain
n/a
p.Pro481Leu
c.1442C>T
Diagnosis
● POAG (Faucher et al., 2002; Fingert et al., 1999)
● OHT (Faucher et al., 2002)
● Angle Closure Glaucoma (Faucher et al., 2002)
Country/Ethnicity
 ○ African American
● Canadian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Ye s(Faucher et al., 2002)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ ++ (Gobeil et al., 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
Destabilized
 ○ Tm= 45.5 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 46.6 °C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade E, on β-turn between internal strands, side chain buried

Interactions
● Pro481 forms H-bonding interaction to Lys484 N in same loop

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, removal of constraint within β-turn
See p.Pro481Thr n/a
p.Ile499Phe
c.1495A>T
Diagnosis
● POAG (Adam et al., 1997; Melki, Belmouden, et al., 2003)
Country/Ethnicity
● French
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Adam et al., 1997)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)/+ (Vollrath & Liu, 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ +++ (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Partially Insoluble (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999)
Destabilized
 ○ Tm =42.8°C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 44.4°C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade E, exterior strand, side chain buried in hydrophobic belt

Interactions
● Hydrophobic

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, side chain to large
See p.Ile499Ser n/a
p.Ile499Ser
c.1496T>G
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Shimizu et al., 2000)
Country/Ethnicity
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Shimizu et al., 2000)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
● Insoluble (Shimizu et al., 2000)
Likely destabilized
 ○ n/a (but see Ile499Phe)
Location
● Blade E, exterior strand, side chain buried in hydrophobic belt

Interactions
● Hydrophobic

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, new polarity in hydrophobic environment
See p.Ile499Phe n/a

p.Ser502Pro
c.1504T>C
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Stoilova et al., 1998)
Country/Ethnicity
● English
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Stoilova et al., 1998)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)
● 30 °C
 ○ - (Gobeil et al., 2006)

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
Destabilized
 ○ Tm= 41.0 °C (Donegan et al., 2012) or 43.0 °C (Burns et al., 2011), buffer dependent
Location
● Blade E, molecular clasp, surface exposed

Interactions
● Main chain to Glu247

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, new backbone constraint
n/a ● Adenovirus-injected myocilinS502P into mouse eyes did not result in IOP elevation (Shepard et al., 2007)

 C. Likely Pathogenic
Variant Clinical Data Cell Assays Thermal Stability Structure Analysis Additional Variants Other

p.Val251Ala
c.752T>C
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Kuchtey, Chowdhury, Uptegraft, Fautsch, & Kuchtey, 2013; Lu et al., 2020; K. Michels-Rautenstrauss et al., 2002)
● POAG (Lu et al., 2020)
● OHT (Lu et al., 2020)
Country/Ethnicity
● German
● Chinese
● US/Caucasian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Kuchtey et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2020; K. Michels-Rautenstrauss et al., 2002)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade E, molecular clasp, side chain pointed inward toward hydrophobic belt

Interactions
● None

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Uncertain, Val to Ala substitution is conservative, but weaker hydrophobic packing
● p.Val251Ile (c.751G>A)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 1, allele frequency 4.14e-6
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● MyocilinV251A was not found in the aqueous humor of a patient with JOAG (Kuchtey et al., 2013)
p.Pro254Arg
c.761C>G
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Yang et al., 2015)
● POAG (Yang et al., 2015)
Country/Ethnicity
● Chinese
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Yang et al., 2015)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade E, molecular clasp

Interactions
● Main chain carbonyl forms polar interactions with Arg470, located on an opposing loop that connects Blade D and Blade E

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, would remove backbone restriction in molecular clasp and side chain too large
● p.Pro254Leu (c.761C>T) (Souzeau et al., 2016)
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
n/a
p.Leu255Pro
c.764T>C
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Park et al., 2016)
Country/Ethnicity
● Korean
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Park et al., 2016)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade E, outer strand, surface exposed

Interactions
● Main chain H-bonds with Thr496 main chain

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, would introduce di-proline motif, further limiting the polypeptide backbone mobility
● p.Leu255Val (c.763G>C)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 3, allele frequency 1.23e-5
 ○ Uncertain
n/a
p.Pro274Arg
c.821C>G
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Markandaya et al., 2004)
Country/Ethnicity
● Indian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Markandaya et al., 2004)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade A, loop connecting innermost strands

Interactions
● None

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, Arg would remove restrictions placed on polypeptide backbone and also disrupt packing
● p.Pro274Leu (c.821C>T)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 1, allele frequency 4e-6
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● Youngest family member homozygous for mutation(Markandaya et al., 2004)
p.Gln337Arg
● c.1010A>G
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Gupta et al., 2020; Stoilova et al., 1997)
Country/Ethnicity
● Scottish
● Indian
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Gupta et al., 2020)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade B, loop connecting inner strands

Interactions
● Main chain carbonyl forms polar contact with Glu323 main chain NH
● Side chain forms polar contact with main chain carbonyl of Ser341

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, sterically incompatible
● See p.Gln337* (c.1009delC)
● p.Gln337Glu (c.1009C>G) (Vázquez et al., 2009)
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● p.Gln337His (c.1011G>T)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 1, allele frequency 3.98e-6
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
● Homozygous individuals identified in two families (Gupta et al., 2020)
p.Ser341Pro
c.1021T>C
Diagnosis
● JOAG (X. Huang et al., 2014)
● POAG (X. Huang et al., 2014; Kee & Ahn, 1997; Moon, Kim, & Lee, 2020; F. Wang et al., 2015)
● OHT (F. Wang et al., 2015)
Country/Ethnicity
● Chinese
● Korean
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Ye s(X. Huang et al., 2014; Kee & Ahn, 1997; Moon et al., 2020; F. Wang et al., 2015)
● No (X. Huang et al., 2014)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade B, turn between internal strands

Interactions
● Main chain carbonyl forms polar contact with Gln337 side chain, main chain NH forms polar contact with carbonyl of Gly338
● Side chain hydroxyl forms polar interactions with NH Thr343 and CO Gly338

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, restrict backbone and reduce available stabilizing interactions
n/a n/a
p.Ala363Thr
c.1087G>A
Diagnosis
● POAG (Ishikawa et al., 2004; R. Kubota et al., 2000; Mengkegale et al., 2008)

Country/Ethnicity
● Japanese
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (R. Kubota et al., 2000; Ryo Kubota et al., 1997; Mengkegale et al., 2008)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ - (Izumi et al., 2003)
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Long loop between Blade B and Blade C, pointed inward

Interactions
● Main chain NH forms polar contact with carbonyl Ile360, main chain carbonyl forms polar contact with side chain Arg342

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Uncertain, relatively conservative substitution but introduces new polarity into relatively hydrophobic region
n/a n/a
p.Phe369Leu
c.1105T>C
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Hamanaka et al., 2017)
● POAG (Hamanaka et al., 2017; Ishikawa et al., 2004)
Country/Ethnicity
● Japanese
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Hamanaka et al., 2017; Ishikawa et al., 2004)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Long loop between Blade B and Blade C, surface exposed

Interactions
● Main chain carbonyl makes polar contact with Lys423 Nε

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Uncertain, Phe369 protects Lys423 from solvent, unclear if Leu would suffice
n/a ● One patient homozygous for variant (Hamanaka et al., 2017)
● Detailed histochemical analysis (Hamanaka et al., 2017)
p.Tyr371Asp
c.1111T>G
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Avisar et al., 2009)
Country/Ethnicity
● Uzbek
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Avisar et al., 2009)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Long loop between Blade B and Blade C, points inward

Interactions
● Main chain NH forms polar contact with side chain hydroxyl of Thr377; carbonyl forms polar contact with main chain NH of Trp373
● Side chain ring forms cation-π with Lys423 and hydroxyl forms polar interaction with Asp380

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, based on analogy with Lys423Glu
n/a n/a
p.Glu385Lys
c.1153G>A
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Criscione et al., 2019)
Country/Ethnicity
● Hispanic
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Ye s(Avisar et al., 2009; Criscione et al., 2019)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
Likely destabilized
 ○ Tm= 39.7 °C for OLFE385A (Donegan et al., 2012)
Location
● Blade C, bottom face, on turn between innermost blades

Interactions
● Side chain forms polar contacts with main chain NH of Cys433 on Blade D, and with sidechains of Tyr 479 and Lys484 on Blade E

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, critical interactions would be lost
n/a n/a
p.Thr438Ile
c.1313C>T
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Jansson et al., 2003; Melki, Belmouden, et al., 2003; Souzeau et al., 2015)
Country/Ethnicity
● Australian
● French
● Danish
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Jansson et al., 2003; Melki, Belmouden, et al., 2003; Souzeau et al., 2015)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade D, interior strand

Interactions
● Side chain hydroxyl group forms polar interaction with Asn450 sidechain

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, polar intra-blade contact would be lost
● p.Thr438Pro (c.1312A>C)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 6, allele frequency 2.39e-5
 ○ Likely deleterious to structure
n/a
p.Asn450Tyr
c.1348A>T
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Zhao et al., 2010)
● OHT (Zhao et al., 2010)
Country/Ethnicity
● Chinese
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Yes (Zhao et al., 2010)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade D, interior strand, points to surface

Interactions
● Side chain forms polar contact with Thr438 side chain hydroxyl

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, Tyr would pose a steric challenge with the loop connecting Blade C and Blade D
● p.Asn450Asp (c.1348A>G) (K. Michels-Rautenstrauss et al., 2002)
 ○ Likely tolerated in the structure
● p.Asn450Ser (c.1349A>G)
 ○ gnomAD: allele count 2, allele frequency 7.95e-6
 ○ Likely tolerated in the structure
n/a
p.Leu486Phe
● c.1456C>T
Diagnosis
● JOAG (Liao et al., 2016)
● POAG (X. Huang et al., 2014)
Country/Ethnicity
● Chinese
Family History of POAG/JOAG?
● Ye s(Liao et al., 2016)
● No (X. Huang et al., 2014)
gnomAD?
 ○ n/a
Secretion Assay
● 37 °C
 ○ n/a
● 30 °C
 ○ n/a

Triton X-100 Solubility Assay
 ○ n/a
n/a Location
● Blade E, inner strand, pointed inward

Interactions
● Main chain NH forms polar interaction with Thr496 sidechain; main chain carbonyl forms polar contact with carbonyl of Tyr497

Predicted consequence of substitution
● Deleterious, would require rearrangements to fit larger side chain
n/a n/a
a

qualitative extent of secretion − = no secretion, −/+ = very little secretion, +, ++, +++ increasing levels of secretion

Relevant data to pathogenicity categories

Clinical metrics

MYOC mutations that segregate with early-onset glaucoma in affected pedigrees provide the best evidence for pathogenicity. The most reliable genetic data are come from pedigrees with sufficient size and structure where autosomal-dominant heritability of OAG is evident (MacArthur et al., 2014; Wiggs, 2007). For the purposes of this study, we did not restrict categories based on the size of the pedigree, but defined early onset diagnosis as occurring at or earlier than the 4th decade of life, with ocular hypertension (OHT) considered with an IOP greater than ~25 mmHg (Gordon et al., 2002) and visual field abnormality reported by an average cup-disc ratio above ~0.3 (Gordon et al., 2002). Note that some variants were only found in study control groups and thus were not diagnosed with OHT or OAG.

Support for Toxic GOF

The pathogenic mechanism by which mutations in myocilin lead to glaucoma is an active area of research, but the toxic GOF hypothesis due to intracellular mutant protein misfolding is well supported. Neither overexpression of WT myocilin in mice (Gould et al., 2004; Zillig, Wurm, Grehn, Russell, & Tamm, 2005), nor ablating myocilin in mice (Kim et al., 2001), nor humans with homozygous N-terminal truncation mutations (Lam et al., 2000) or heterozygous MYOC deletion (Wiggs & Vollrath, 2001) leads to glaucoma. Early studies of myocilin supported the conclusion that OLF-resident myocilin variants accumulate intracellularly, in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Gobeil et al., 2006; Gobeil et al., 2004; Joe et al., 2003; Liu & Vollrath, 2004; Vollrath & Liu, 2006; Yam, Gaplovska-Kysela, Zuber, & Roth, 2007; Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999), instead of being secreted to the TM. Cell stress occurs at least in part because Grp94, the ER-resident Hsp90 molecular chaperone that acts late in the folding process (Marzec, Eletto, & Argon, 2012), recognizes the nearly-folded mutant myocilin and catalyzes aberrant coaggregation (D. J. Huard et al., 2018; Stothert, Fontaine, Sabbagh, & Dickey, 2016; Stothert et al., 2014; A. Suntharalingam et al., 2012); however, Grp94 involvement has only been tested explicitly on a limited number of missense variants and cell types. In selected studies, the general ER stress-relieving compound 4-phenylbutyrate was shown to ameliorate misfolding (Yam et al., 2007; Zode et al., 2011). The downstream pathway leading to glaucoma is still unknown, but TM cell death likely compromises the TM matrix that subsequently obstructs aqueous humor fluid outflow. The resulting fluid imbalance could lead to clinically observed IOP increases.

Cellular assays

In the laboratory, the extent of secretion has been evaluated by a cellular assay. Secretion assays are typically conducted by transiently transfecting model mammalian cell lines (e.g. HEK293T or CHO) with plasmids encoding myocilin variants and evaluating the extent of secretion and intracellular accumulation after 2-3 days by Western blot (Gobeil et al., 2006; Vollrath & Liu, 2006), fluorescence of the fused corresponding green fluorescence protein (Yam et al., 2007), or more recently, by enzymatic detection of luciferase (Zadoo, Nguyen, Zode, & Hulleman, 2016). Cells are cultured at 37 °C and sometimes at 30 °C (Liu & Vollrath, 2004; Vollrath & Liu, 2006), so-called permissive temperatures in which protein translation and folding is slowed and variants are further away from their melting temperatures (Tm, see biochemical assays below). An additional assay tests the solubility of intracellular aggregates isolated from transfected cells cultured at 37 °C, using Triton X-100, a surfactant that can solubilize all but the most insoluble of aggregates (Z. Zhou & Vollrath, 1999). A tetracycline-inducible HEK cell model expressing Y437H, I477N, or WT myocilin has also been valuable in dissecting cellular defects of mutant myocilins (Joe & Tomarev, 2010; Amirthaa Suntharalingam et al., 2012).

Histochemical analysis and animal models

For a few myocilin variants, ocular tissues from singular affected patient have undergone histochemical analysis (Hamanaka et al., 2017; van der Heide et al., 2018). In terms of animal models, several myocilin glaucoma rodent models have been attempted, using a variety of approaches: inducible models using different promotors, transgenic mice with varying methods, and different genetic backgrounds. Briefly, these models include a myocilin knock out mouse (Kim et al., 2001), mice overexpressing WT myocilin (Gould et al., 2004; Shepard et al., 2007), mice expressing Tyr423His mutant myocilin, equivalent to Tyr437His in humans (Gould et al., 2006; Senatorov et al., 2006), a variety of mice expressing human Tyr437His myocilin (Chou, Tomarev, & Porciatti, 2014; Shepard et al., 2007; Y. Zhou, Grinchuk, & Tomarev, 2008; Zillig et al., 2005; Zode et al., 2011), a mouse expressing human Tyr437His myocilin also deficient in SOD2 (Joe, Nakaya, Abu-Asab, & Tomarev, 2015), a Tyr435His myocilin rat, equivalent to Tyr437His in humans (Lynch et al., 2018), and human myocilin Gly364Val, Ser502Pro, and Gln368X introduced into a mouse eye by adenovirus (Shepard et al., 2007). In general, severity of glaucoma in rodent models expressing mutant myocilins is less than that found in humans. The reasons for this are not yet clear, but genetic background (McDowell et al., 2012), inherent aggregation kinetics of mouse myocilin (Patterson-Orazem et al., 2019), and subtle anatomical differences are possibilities.

Biophysical assays

Biophysical studies are conducted on an isolated, purified OLF domain construct and corresponding point variants introduced by site directed mutagenesis (Burns et al., 2010; Burns, Turnage, Walker, & Lieberman, 2011). To date, nearly 40 variants of the isolated OLF domain have been characterized across different studies. One measure is protein thermal stability, with the Tm defined as the midway point of unfolding, usually measured by differential scanning fluorimetry (Burns et al., 2010; Burns et al., 2011). The Tm of WT OLF is typical of a human protein, 52.7 °C (Burns et al., 2011), with slight variability depending on the buffer (Donegan, Hill, Turnage, Orwig, & Lieberman, 2012). Biophysical studies have clarified that intracellular sequestration arises because glaucoma-associated variants are thermally destabilized (Burns et al., 2011). A second metric is fibrillization of the OLF domain under mild conditions (e.g. pH 7.5, 37 °C), as measured with the amyloid dye thioflavin T (ThT) and corroborated by numerous other experiments (Hill, Donegan, & Lieberman, 2014; Orwig et al., 2012). Disease variants aggregate with faster kinetics than WT OLF (Hill et al., 2014).

Structural data

The OLF crystal structure revealed a β-propeller fold in which five so-called “blades,” (labeled Blades A-E) are composed of four antiparallel β-strands (Donegan et al., 2015) (Fig. 2). β-propellers are unusual in that they do not have the typical stabilizing “hydrophobic core” found in globular proteins. The propeller blades wrap around a central hydrophilic cavity creating a hydrophobic “belt” primarily between the middle hairpins of the β-sheet blades, where packing of hydrophobic residues is observed. The N-and C-terminal strands form part of the final blade in the feature called a molecular clasp. A single disulfide bond between two residues near the start (Cys 245) and end (Cys 433) further stabilize the OLF structure. In the central hydrophilic cavity there is a calcium ion and another metal ion modeled as a sodium, with ligands derived from side chain residues derived from different blades. Connecting Blade B to Blade C is a long loop of 19 residues, and at the interface between Blades C and D there is an unusual stabilizing cation-π interaction formed between a buried Lys423 and Tyr371, which is connected by polar interaction with the calcium site and appears to be stabilized by residues found on the aforementioned long loop.

Figure 2. Overview of the OLF propeller structure.

Figure 2.

Four antiparallel beta strands form each of five blades, labeled A-E. Hydrophobic “belt” largely between middle strands of each blade is represented by grey taurus. Other features described in text, long loop connecting Blade B to Blade C (Glu359-Asp378), metal site with coordinating ligands, side helix adjacent to Blade A (Asp302-Tyr311), and molecular clasp in Blade E (Gly244-Arg258 and Met494-Ser502), as illustrated separately in best-view orientation.

A starting point for evaluating consequences of OLF mutations in the absence of other data would be based on their likelihood of affecting one of the aforementioned main structural features of the OLF domain. In general, though not always (Hill, Cho, Raut, & Lieberman, 2019; Hill, Kwon, et al., 2019), structure-based physicochemical intuition provides a rationale for a deleterious prediction. For example, modifications to surface loops lacking discrete intermolecular interactions with other residues in the domain are likely to tolerate mutations more readily than changes internal to the structure where the substitution interferes with the native packing and intermolecular interactions. Mutations within OLF residues comprising the β-sheet belt by changing its polarity would be expected to be incompatible with hydrophobic packing and thus compromise the stability of the protein. Substitutions that impair the stability of the molecular clasp, weaken or abolish the disulfide bond, remove a metal ion ligand, disrupt the cation-π interaction, or destabilize the well-ordered long loop are likewise expected to be problematic. Knowledge of the extent of sequence conservation at each position can further support tolerance of other amino acids at a given position. For each variant described herein, we visualized the residue in PyMOL in the context of the overall propeller. Then we inspected the local environment to assess polar and nonpolar non-covalent interactions with neighboring residues. With the aid of the mutation wizard within PyMOL, the residue of interest was then mutated to the documented variant and the process of inspecting prospective interactions was repeated.

Selection of variants

We identified variants that appear in at least one literature report (Supp. Figure S1, Table 1) and focused on the 97 tabulated in Table 2, Supp. Table S1, and Supp. Table S2. GnomAD allele counts and frequency as of the submission of this manuscript are included where available but we did not include detailed analysis of variants that only appear in gnomAD (Supp. Table S3). For some amino acid positions, more than one variant with clinical and laboratory data is listed (Table 2, 3, Supp. Table S2). Those listed as ‘additional variants’ include variants found only in gnomAD (Table 3) or ones that have only clinical data from a single literature source (Table 2, Supp. Table S2). The predicted pathogenicity for such additional variants does not necessarily match that of the primary variant.

Table 3.

gnomAD allele counts and frequency for different categories of myocilin (Refseq NM_000261.2) variants

Position Additional variant Allele Count Allele Frequency Polyphen Prediction1 Sift prediction1
Benign
p.Thr293Lys 157 5.60e-04 Benign Tolerated
p.Thr293Ala 1 4.02e-6 Benign Tolerated
p.Thr293Met 3 1.21e-5 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Val329Met 72 2.55e-04 Possibly_damaging Tolerated
p.Glu352Lys 337 1.19e-03 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Thr353Ile 191 6.75e-04 Benign Deleterious
p.Lys398Arg 992 3.51e-03 Benign Tolerated
p.Ala445Val 57 2.01e-04 Benign Deleterious
p.Lys500Arg 161 5.69e-04 Benign Tolerated
p.Lys500Thr 1 3.98e-6 Benign Tolerated
Pathogenic
p.Gly252Arg N/A N/A
p.Gly252Glu 2 8.25e-06 Probably damaging Deleterious
p.Gly252Ala 3 1.15e-05 Probably damaging Deleterious
p.Arg272Gly N/A N/A
p.Arg272Gln 2 8.01e-06 Benign Tolerated
p.Arg272* 2 8.02e-06 High confidence loss of function
p.Glu323Lys N/A N/A
p.Glu323_Val 329dup 1 3.98e-06
p.Gly364Val N/A N/A
p.Gy364Ser 2 7.95e-06 Probably damaging Tolerated
p.Pro370Leu N/A N/A
p.Pro370Ser 1 3.19e-05 Probably damaging Deleterious
p.Thr377Met 5 1.99e-05 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Thr377Ala 2 7.96e-6 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Pro481Thr N/A N/A
p.Pro481Ser 1 3.98e-06 Possibly damaging Tolerated
Likely Pathogenic
p.Val251Ala N/A N/A
p.Val251Ile 1 4.14e-06 Possibly damaging Tolerated
p.Leu255Pro N/A N/A
p.Leu255Val 3 1.23e-05 Benign Tolerated
p.Pro274Arg N/A N/A
p.Pro274Leu 1 4e-06 Probably damaging Deleterious
p.Thr438Ile N/A N/A
p.Thr438Pro 6 2.39e-05 Probably damaging Deleterious
p.Asn450Tyr N/A N/A
p.Asn450Ser 2 7.95e-06 Probably damaging Deleterious
Uncertain Significance—Lean Pathogenic
p.Gly244Val 6 2.51e-05 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Gly244Arg 2 7.95e-6 Possibly_damaging Deleterious
p.Thr285Met 7 2.80e-05 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Thr285Pro 1 4e-6 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Trp286Arg 2 8.01e-06 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Gly300Lys 10 3.58e-05 Possibly_damaging Tolerated
p.Gly326Ser 1 3.98e-06 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Leu334Pro 3 1.19e-05 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Leu334Val 1 3.98e-6 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Ile360Asn N/A N/A
p.Ile360Leu 1 3.98e-06 Benign Tolerated
p.Gly387Asp 3 1.19e-05 Possibly_damaging Deleterious
p.Asp395_Glu396insAspPro N/A N/A
p.Asp395Glu 5 1.99e-05 Benign Tolerated
p.Asp395Asn 3 1.19e-05 Benign Tolerated
p.Gly399Asp N/A N/A
p.Gly399Val 4 1.59e-5 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Ser425Pro N/A N/A
p.Ser425* 1 3.98e-06 High confidence loss of function
p.Phe430Leu N/A N/A
p.Phe430Ser 1 3.98e-06 Probably damaging Deleterious
p.Arg470Cys 6 3.31e-05 Benign Tolerated
p.Arg470His 3 1.19e-5 Benign Tolerated
p.Arg470Leu 1 3.19e-5 Benign Deleterious
Uncertain Significance—Lean Benign
p.Thr256Met 23 8.36e-05 Possibly_damaging Tolerated
p.Thr256Ala 1 4.11e-6 Benign Tolerated
p.Thr256Arg 3 1.23e-05 Probably damaging Deleterious
p.Arg296Cys 4 1.61e-5 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Arg296His 17 6.1e-5 Possibly_damaging Deleterious
p.Arg296Leu 1 4.04e-6 Possibly_damaging Deleterious
p.Gln297His N/A N/A
p.Gln297Arg 1 4.03e-06 Benign Tolerated
p.Leu303Ile 17 6.08e-05 Benign Tolerated
p.Leu303Phe 4 1.43e-5 Benign Tolerated
p.Ser313Phe 17 6.05e-05 Probably_damaging Tolerated
p.Ser313Cys 2 7.11e-6 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Ser331Thr N/A N/A
p.Ser331Leu 12 4.24e-05 Benign Tolerated
p.Ser333Cys N/A N/A
p.Ser333Asn 5 1.99e-05 Possibly damaging Deleterious
p.Arg342Lys N/A N/A
p.Arg342Gly 3 1.19e-05 Benign Deleterious
p.Ile345Met N/A N/A
p.Ile345Thr 1 3.98e-06 Benign Tolerated
p.Thr419Ala 1 3.98e-06 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Arg422Cys 8 3.18e-5 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Arg422His 8 3.18e-5 Benign Tolerated
p.Ala427Thr 12 4.77e-05 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Gly434Ser 1 3.98e-06 Possibly_damaging Deleterious
p.Asp446Tyr 8 2.83e-05 Possibly_damaging Deleterious
p.Asp446His 1 3.98e-6 Benign Tolerated
p.Ala447Thr N/A N/A
p.Ala447Val 2 7.95e-06 Possibly_damaging Deleterious
p.Tyr471Cys 7 2.78e-05 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Met476Arg 3 1.19e-05 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Met476Leu 1 3.98e-6 Possibly_damaging Deleterious
Uncertain Significance—Premature termination
p.Gln337Argfs*9 N/A N/A
p.Gln337His 1 3.98e-6 Probably_damaging Deleterious
p.Gln368* 314 1.11e-03 High confidence loss of function
Tyr453Metsf*11 20 7.07e-5 High confidence loss of function

Pathogenicity categories

Pathogenicity categories for myocilin variants were defined as recommended by the ACMG- American College of Medical Genetics and Association for Molecular Pathology (Richards et al., 2015)- except for the large category of Uncertain Significance, which we batched further into lean pathogenic, lean benign, and premature termination. The associated criteria for defined categories are presented here, Table 1 additionally lists the variants for each category. For each variant (Table 2, Supp. Table S2), we include detailed available data (Supp. Table S1) that support its inclusion in the given category.

Benign

Seven variants were identified with a high allele count (>50) and frequency (>2e-4) in gnomAD (ENSG00000034971), all missense. Many have been identified in POAG patients in the literature but given their high prevalence in the general population and laboratory data demonstrating key similarities with WT OLF, these are best annotated as benign (Fig. 3A). All but K500R have confirmed WT-like secretion and stability, suggesting that these variants are not causative for glaucoma despite having been documented among glaucoma patients.

Figure 3. Categories of variants mapped onto OLF structure.

Figure 3.

See also Table 1. (A) Benign: sites with high frequency variations from gnomAD (>50 allele count, allele frequency >2e-4) and wild-type like laboratory properties. (B) Pathogenic: sites with strongest clinical and laboratory experimental misfolding support. (C) Likely pathogenic: sites with strong clinical but incomplete laboratory support. (D) Uncertain Significance - Lean pathogenic: sites with limited clinical support and incomplete laboratory support. (E) Uncertain Significance- Lean benign: sites clinical findings in control group, incomplete laboratory support. (F) Uncertain Significance- premature termination: premature stop codons result in incomplete translation of OLF protein.

Pathogenic

Twenty-three missense variants and one indel variant have strong support for pathogenicity (Fig. 3B): a confirmed familial inheritance pattern, additional clinical data indicative of early-onset POAG. Nearly variants all are absent from gnomAD, one or more labs have confirmed cellular defects, and our lab has demonstrated stability defects for all but two. In agreement with these features, structural features are not predicted to be tolerated. For example, for Pro to Leu substitutions, eg. Pro481Leu, prolines are known to be important for loops and turns in proteins (Chothia, Gelfand, & Kister, 1998), and substitutions are unlikely to be well tolerated, as seen in other heritable disorders (Darin et al., 2016).

Likely pathogenic

Thirteen missense variants have clinical data that support early onset, familial POAG or JOAG (Fig. 3C). For these, laboratory analyses supporting a misfolding phenotype are largely missing, but intuition based on effects of mutation on local structure generally support the inference that the effect of mutation would be deleterious, leading to a mutant protein with a pathogenic misfolding phenotype. Pathogenic assignments would be strengthened with laboratory studies.

Uncertain significance

For the remaining ~50% variants we considered (53/97), assigning pathogenicity is not straightforward. For these, clinical and segregation data is limited to one report in a small family, or not available because the variant was only detected in large scale genetics studies, and no biochemical data exists. Sixteen missense and two indel variants of uncertain significance binned as lean pathogenic (Fig. 3D) have clinical data indicative of POAG association, but not necessarily Mendelian inheritance patterns and/or early age of diagnosis. Laboratory data are incomplete. Our structural intuition generally suggests pathogenic. Twenty-eight variants clustered as lean benign (Fig. 3E) have clinical data supporting a benign variant designation, namely, being identified in a control population or having glaucoma onset significantly later than age 40. Biochemical data, where present, do not suggest a strong misfolding phenotype and intuition generally suggests these substitutions are unlikely to affect the OLF structure and stability.

Finally, we aggregate 4 indel and 3 missense variants involving premature termination (Fig. 3F) that are described in the literature. A total of 24 premature termination heterozygous variants within OLF are known (18 in gnomAD, 6 additional listed in the literature), including the well-studied and prevalent Gln368* (~ 0.1% allele frequency) and the relatively common frameshift mutation Tyr453Metfs*11 (0.071% allele frequency) that also leads to premature termination. These variants may prove pathogenic with additional studies, but likely by a different mechanism than pathogenic missense variants that adopt a destabilized but near-native folded state. When premature termination is introduced in the middle of the protein e.g. for Gln337Argfs*9, Gly362Glufs*45, Gln368*, one or more β-strands within the OLF domain propeller cannot form, preventing any native-like folded structure from being adopted. Gln368* and likely other mid-OLF termination variants share laboratory characteristics of missense variants: the intracellular deposits (Gobeil et al., 2006) exhibit a dominant negative effect with respect to WT myocilin (Gobeil et al., 2004) and are insoluble in Triton X-100 (Shimizu et al., 2000). Such non-folding termination variants would likely not reach the stage of protein quality control involving Grp94 (D. J. E. Huard et al., 2018; Huard, Jonke, Torres, & Lieberman, 2019; Marzec et al., 2012; Stothert et al., 2014; Amirthaa Suntharalingam et al., 2012) and thus be identified by different ER chaperones (Ellgaard, McCaul, Chatsisvili, & Braakman, 2016), leading to different consequences. Further laboratory investigations of termination variants would be informative. In addition, recent finding that Gln368* is pathogenic in the presence of other age-onset glaucoma susceptibility genes (Craig et al., 2020) suggests that pathogenicity of other premature stop or indel variants could be further modulated by considering the broader context of a given individual.

The complex structure-misfolding relationship for OLF missense variants

Pathogenic variants are destabilized (Burns et al., 2010; Burns et al., 2011; Donegan et al., 2015), a feature that explains their misfolding propensity and downstream GOF pathogenic mechanism. However, as underscored by the numerous surprises we encountered in the lab (Lieberman & Ma, 2021), the effect of a mutation on OLF structure and stability cannot be predicted with a high degree of confidence, despite applying reasonable physicochemical intuition. Sequence conservation mapped onto the structure demonstrates that across the OLF sequence, the surface residues are least conserved and internal sequences are largely conserved (Donegan et al., 2015). Based on this observation, substitution of residues found on the interior of the OLF propeller would be expected to be poorly tolerated. Unexpectedly, we increased OLF stability by introducing single or double-point variants at relatively conserved internal positions corresponding to calcium ligands, which should not have been tolerated (Hill, Cho, et al., 2019; Hill, Kwon, et al., 2019). One variant we did not study in the lab but has clinically been found only in control subjects, N428S, may be similarly stabilizing, or perhaps additional functional insights will reveal a loss of function relevant to glaucoma. Finally, we computationally engineered the OLF domain to be significantly higher stability by changing ~10% of its sequence with a range of extent of conservation (Hill, Kwon, et al., 2019) and the structure of this metallated, 21-variant of OLF was unchanged compared to wild-type (Hill, Kwon, et al., 2019).

Related, GOF is not readily inferred from sequence conservation and protein structure considerations used traditionally to computationally predict the consequence of a missense change (Eilbeck, Quinlan, & Yandell, 2017) and OLF is no exception. Even if loss of function for myocilin plays a role in glaucoma, the role of WT myocilin remains unknown and is apparently not essential (Gould et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2001; Lam et al., 2000). Newer algorithms like SIFT (Vaser, Adusumalli, Leng, Sikic, & Ng, 2016) and Polyphen (Adzhubei, Jordan, & Sunyaev, 2013), whose analyses are conveniently included in gnomAD and integrate population allele frequency data along with gene conservation and other constraints, predict more missense OLF variants to be damaging compared to our analysis (Table 3), as for other GOF diseases (Flanagan, Patch, & Ellard, 2010). Five of our benign variants were predicted to be damaging by one or both prediction programs. The jury is still out for the effect of most rare variants lacking complete data, but Glu352Lys, which is predicted to be damaging by both programs, has the second highest allele frequency within the OLF domain plus clinical and laboratory data that do not align with a misfolding phenotype. OLF may be an especially challenging case for predicting destabilization leading to a GOF.

Summary and Future Directions

Myocilin-associated glaucoma is an excellent example of how the acceleration of large scale sequencing data resulting in a catalog of genetic variation, in combination with recent laboratory and clinical data, adds new complexities in interpreting mutations in the context of a disease with a high burden throughout the world. Glaucoma is an age-onset, multifactorial disease and myocilin variants are not pathogenic without significant accompanying data and analysis. Given the importance of myocilin in the TM tissue that underlies IOP maintenance, and the potential for new medicines once a solid pathophysiological understanding of myocilin-associated glaucoma is established, there is a need to confidently classify myocilin variants.

New variants are expected to arise as additional genome sequencing data becomes available. Here we have considered the current exhaustive list of clinically characterized OLF variants and associated laboratory data, yet these are just ~10% of the total theoretical number of possible single nucleotide variants of the OLF domain, which is closer to ~1500. Research over the past 20 years have made significant inroads correlating clinical findings and biological attributes for a particular variant that can be used to differentiate likely benign and misfolding variants. Going forward, laboratory approaches yielding large datasets may prove effective. For example, one-pot mutagenesis library methods coupled to high throughput secretion assays could provide intracellular sequestration and thermal stability data for the remaining single point variants. In turn, such variants could be properly flagged for potential follow up, if detected genetically.

In the long term, it is tantalizing to think about how complete data could be used with machine learning algorithms to triangulate information for confident variant assessment, and then to tailor effective treatments as being considered for other systems (C. Wang & Balch, 2018). To this end, mechanistic studies are needed to clarify the extent to which different rare GOF myocilin mutations lead to POAG by a similar mechanism, whether there is a specific auxiliary pathogenic role for premature termination variants, why animal models generated thus far do not faithfully replicate disease severity observed in humans, reconcile occasional clinical observations that do not follow expected pathogenicity e.g. a 52 year old patient carrying Asp380Ala (Stoilova et al., 1998), or homozygous carriers of Lys423Glu (Morissette et al., 1998) who do not display glaucoma symptoms, and to what extent myocilin dysfunction plays a role in idiopathic glaucoma. The multidisciplinary approach combining large scale gene sequencing, clinical data, and biological studies will reveal, and hopefully resolve, complexities of this fascinating misfolding-prone protein and its contribution to glaucoma pathogenesis.

Supplementary Material

supinfo

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by R01EY021205. EGS is supported by NIH T32EY007092. We thank J. Wiggs and C. McDowell for helpful discussions.

Funding Information:

R01EY021205, T32EY007092

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable – no new data generated. Clinical data collected in Supplemental Data Table S1.

References

  1. Adam MF, Belmouden A, Binisti P, Brézin AP, Valtot F, Béchetoille A, … Garchon HJ (1997). Recurrent mutations in a single exon encoding the evolutionarily conserved olfactomedin-homology domain of TIGR in familial open-angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet, 6(12), 2091–2097. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.12.2091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, & Sunyaev SR (2013). Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet, Chapter 7, Unit7 20. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0720s76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allingham RR, Wiggs JL, De La Paz MA, Vollrath D, Tallett DA, Broomer B, … Pericak-Vance MA (1998). Gln368STOP myocilin mutation in families with late-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 39(12), 2288–2295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alward WL, Fingert JH, Coote MA, Johnson AT, Lerner SF, Junqua D, … Stone EM (1998). Clinical features associated with mutations in the chromosome 1 open-angle glaucoma gene (GLC1A). N Engl J Med, 338(15), 1022–1027. doi: 10.1056/nejm199804093381503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alward WL, Kwon YH, Khanna CL, Johnson AT, Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, … Stone EM (2002). Variations in the myocilin gene in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 120(9), 1189–1197. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.9.1189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Angius A, De Gioia E, Loi A, Fossarello M, Sole G, Orzalesi N, … Pirastu M (1998). A novel mutation in the GLC1A gene causes juvenile open-angle glaucoma in 4 families from the Italian region of Puglia. Arch Ophthalmol, 116(6), 793–797. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.6.793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Angius A, Pisano M, Sanca A, Casu G, Persico I, Pitzalis S, … Pirastu M (1998). Molecular basis of open-angle glaucoma in Italy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl(227), 16–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1998.tb00865.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Aung T, Yong VH, Chew PT, Seah SK, Gazzard G, Foster PJ, & Vithana EN (2005). Molecular analysis of the myocilin gene in Chinese subjects with chronic primary-angle closure glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 46(4), 1303–1306. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Avisar I, Lusky M, Robinson A, Shohat M, Dubois S, Raymond V, & Gaton DD (2009). The novel Y371D myocilin mutation causes an aggressive form of juvenile open-angle glaucoma in a Caucasian family from the Middle-East. Mol Vis, 15, 1945–1950. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Banerjee D, Bhattacharjee A, Ponda A, Sen A, & Ray K (2012). Comprehensive analysis of myocilin variants in east Indian POAG patients. Mol Vis, 18, 1548–1557. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bayat B, Yazdani S, Alavi A, Chiani M, Chitsazian F, Tusi BK, … Elahi E (2008). Contributions of MYOC and CYP1B1 mutations to JOAG. Mol Vis, 14, 508–517. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhattacharjee A, Acharya M, Mukhopadhyay A, Mookherjee S, Banerjee D, Bandopadhyay AK, … Ray K (2007). Myocilin variants in Indian patients with open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 125(6), 823–829. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.6.823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bill A (1975). Editorial: The drainage of aqueous humor. Invest Ophthalmol, 14(1), 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1110131 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Blauwendraat C, Nalls MA, & Singleton AB (2020). The genetic architecture of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol, 19(2), 170–178. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30287-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Booth AP, Anwar R, Chen H, Churchill AJ, Jay J, Polansky J, … Markham AF (2000). Genetic screening in a large family with juvenile onset primary open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol, 84(7), 722–726. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.7.722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brézin AP, Adam MF, Belmouden A, Lureau MA, Chaventré A, Copin B, … Garchon HJ (1998). Founder effect in GLC1A-linked familial open-angle glaucoma in Northern France. Am J Med Genet, 76(5), 438–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brézin AP, Béchetoille A, Hamard P, Valtot F, Berkani M, Belmouden A, … Garchon HJ (1997). Genetic heterogeneity of primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: linkage to GLC1A associated with an increased risk of severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy. J Med Genet, 34(7), 546–552. doi: 10.1136/jmg.34.7.546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bruttini M, Longo I, Frezzotti P, Ciappetta R, Randazzo A, Orzalesi N, … Renieri A (2003). Mutations in the myocilin gene in families with primary open-angle glaucoma and juvenile open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 121(7), 1034–1038. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.7.1034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Burns JN, Orwig SD, Harris JL, Watkins JD, Vollrath D, & Lieberman RL (2010). Rescue of glaucoma-causing mutant myocilin thermal stability by chemical chaperones. ACS Chem Biol, 5(5), 477–487. doi: 10.1021/cb900282e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Burns JN, Turnage KC, Walker CA, & Lieberman RL (2011). The stability of myocilin olfactomedin domain variants provides new insight into glaucoma as a protein misfolding disorder. Biochemistry, 50(26), 5824–5833. doi: 10.1021/bi200231x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Campos-Mollo E, Sánchez-Sánchez F, López-Garrido MP, López-Sánchez E, López-Martínez F, & Escribano J (2007). MYOC gene mutations in Spanish patients with autosomal dominant primary open-angle glaucoma: a founder effect in southeast Spain. Mol Vis, 13, 1666–1673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Challa P, Herndon LW, Hauser MA, Broomer BW, Pericak-Vance MA, Ababio-Danso B, & Allingham RR (2002). Prevalence of myocilin mutations in adults with primary open-angle glaucoma in Ghana, West Africa. J Glaucoma, 11(5), 416–420. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200210000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen J, Cai SP, Yu W, Yan N, Tang L, Chen X, & Liu X (2011). Sequence analysis of MYOC and CYP1B1 in a Chinese pedigree of primary open-angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 17, 1431–1435. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen X, Yan N, Yun H, Sun J, Yu M, Zhou J, … Liu X (2009). Sequence analysis of MYOC and CYP1B1 in a Chinese pedigree of juvenile glaucoma with goniodysgenesis. Mol Vis, 15, 1530–1536. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen Y, Jiang D, Wan B, Yu L, & Sun X (2006). Presymptomatic genetic diagnosis for consulters from a large Chinese family with juvenile open angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 12, 360–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Ma XY, Cai JP, Li Y, Lu GC, & Wei RL (2012). Myocilin polymorphisms and primary open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 7(9), e46632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chong JX, Buckingham KJ, Jhangiani SN, Boehm C, Sobreira N, Smith JD, … Bamshad MJ (2015). The Genetic Basis of Mendelian Phenotypes: Discoveries, Challenges, and Opportunities. Am J Hum Genet, 97(2), 199–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chothia C, Gelfand I, & Kister A (1998). Structural determinants in the sequences of immunoglobulin variable domain. J Mol Biol, 278(2), 457–479. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chou TH, Tomarev S, & Porciatti V (2014). Transgenic mice expressing mutated Tyr437His human myocilin develop progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell electrical responsiveness and axonopathy with normal iop. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 55(9), 5602–5609. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cobb CJ, Scott G, Swingler RJ, Wilson S, Ellis J, MacEwen CJ, & McLean WH (2002). Rapid mutation detection by the transgenomic wave analyser DHPLC identifies MYOC mutations in patients with ocular hypertension and/or open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol, 86(2), 191–195. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.2.191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Craig JE, Han X, Qassim A, Hassall M, Cooke Bailey JN, Kinzy TG, … MacGregor S (2020). Multitrait analysis of glaucoma identifies new risk loci and enables polygenic prediction of disease susceptibility and progression. Nat Genet, 52(2), 160–166. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0556-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Criscione J, Ji W, Jeffries L, McGrath JM, Soloway S, Pusztai L, & Lakhani S (2019). Identification of a novel MYOC variant in a Hispanic family with early-onset primary open-angle glaucoma with elevated intraocular pressure. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud, 5(6). doi: 10.1101/mcs.a004374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Damji KF, Song X, Gupta SK, Gao J, Rock W, & Bulman DE (1999). Childhood-onset primary open angle glaucoma in a Canadian kindred: clinical and molecular genetic features. Ophthalmic Genetics, 20(4), 211–218. doi: 10.1076/opge.20.4.211.2275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Darin N, Reid E, Prunetti L, Samuelsson L, Husain RA, Wilson M, … Clayton PT (2016). Mutations in PROSC Disrupt Cellular Pyridoxal Phosphate Homeostasis and Cause Vitamin-B(6)-Dependent Epilepsy. Am J Hum Genet, 99(6), 1325–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.10.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Donegan RK, Hill SE, Freeman DM, Nguyen E, Orwig SD, Turnage KC, & Lieberman RL (2015). Structural basis for misfolding in myocilin-associated glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet, 24(8), 2111–2124. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Donegan RK, Hill SE, Turnage KC, Orwig SD, & Lieberman RL (2012). The glaucoma-associated olfactomedin domain of myocilin is a novel calcium binding protein. J Biol Chem, 287(52), 43370–43377. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.408906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Eilbeck K, Quinlan A, & Yandell M (2017). Settling the score: variant prioritization and Mendelian disease. Nat Rev Genet, 18(10), 599–612. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ellgaard L, McCaul N, Chatsisvili A, & Braakman I (2016). Co- and Post-Translational Protein Folding in the ER. Traffic, 17(6), 615–638. doi: 10.1111/tra.12392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ennis S, Gibson J, Griffiths H, Bunyan D, Cree AJ, Robinson D, … Lotery A (2010). Prevalence of myocilin gene mutations in a novel UK cohort of POAG patients. Eye (Lond), 24(2), 328–333. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fan B, Liang X, Peng Z, Dong X, Liu Y, Luan J, & Wang N (2002). [Study on single nucleotide polymorphism of TIGR gene in primary open-angle glaucoma patients]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 82(11), 743–747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fan BJ, Leung DY, Wang DY, Gobeil S, Raymond V, Tam PO, … Pang CP (2006). Novel myocilin mutation in a Chinese family with juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 124(1), 102–106. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.1.102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Fan BJ, Wang DY, Fan DS, Tam PO, Lam DS, Tham CC, … Pang CP (2005). SNPs and interaction analyses of myocilin, optineurin, and apolipoprotein E in primary open angle glaucoma patients. Mol Vis, 11, 625–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Faucher M, Anctil JL, Rodrigue MA, Duchesne A, Bergeron D, Blondeau P, … Raymond V (2002). Founder TIGR/myocilin mutations for glaucoma in the Québec population. Hum Mol Genet, 11(18), 2077–2090. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.18.2077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fingert JH (2011). Primary open-angle glaucoma genes. Eye (Lond), 25(5), 587–595. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Fingert JH, Héon E, Liebmann JM, Yamamoto T, Craig JE, Rait J, … Stone EM (1999). Analysis of myocilin mutations in 1703 glaucoma patients from five different populations. Hum Mol Genet, 8(5), 899–905. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.5.899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fingert JH, Stone EM, Sheffield VC, & Alward WL (2002). Myocilin glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol, 47(6), 547–561. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00353-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Flanagan SE, Patch AM, & Ellard S (2010). Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers, 14(4), 533–537. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gasiorowski JZ, & Russell P (2009). Biological properties of trabecular meshwork cells. Exp Eye Res, 88(4), 671–675. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gobeil S, Letartre L, & Raymond V (2006). Functional analysis of the glaucoma-causing TIGR/myocilin protein: integrity of amino-terminal coiled-coil regions and olfactomedin homology domain is essential for extracellular adhesion and secretion. Exp Eye Res, 82(6), 1017–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gobeil S, Rodrigue MA, Moisan S, Nguyen TD, Polansky JR, Morissette J, & Raymond V (2004). Intracellular sequestration of hetero-oligomers formed by wild-type and glaucoma-causing myocilin mutants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 45(10), 3560–3567. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gong G, Kosoko-Lasaki O, Haynatzki GR, & Wilson MR (2004). Genetic dissection of myocilin glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet, 13 Spec No 1, R91–102. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, … Kass MA (2002). The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 120(6), 714–720; discussion 829–730. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gould DB, Miceli-Libby L, Savinova OV, Torrado M, Tomarev SI, Smith RS, & John SW (2004). Genetically increasing Myoc expression supports a necessary pathologic role of abnormal proteins in glaucoma. Mol Cell Biol, 24(20), 9019–9025. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.20.9019-9025.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gould DB, Reedy M, Wilson LA, Smith RS, Johnson RL, & John SW (2006). Mutant myocilin nonsecretion in vivo is not sufficient to cause glaucoma. Mol Cell Biol, 26(22), 8427–8436. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01127-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Guevara-Fujita ML, Perez-Grossmann RA, Estrada-Cuzcano A, Pawar H, Vargas E, Richards JE, & Fujita R (2008). Recurrent myocilin Asn480Lys glaucoma causative mutation arises de novo in a family of Andean descent. J Glaucoma, 17(1), 67–72. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318133fc5b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gupta V, Somarajan BI, Gupta S, Walia GK, Singh A, Sofi R, … Sharma A (2020). The mutational spectrum of myocilin gene among familial versus sporadic cases of Juvenile onset open angle glaucoma. Eye (Lond). doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0850-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hamanaka T, Kimura M, Sakurai T, Ishida N, Yasuda J, Nagasaki M, … Fuse N (2017). A histologic categorization of aqueous outflow routes in familial open-angle glaucoma and associations with mutations in the MYOC gene in Japanese patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 58(5), 2818–2831. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. He Y, Leung KW, Zhuo YH, & Ge J (2009). Pro370Leu mutant myocilin impairs mitochondrial functions in human trabecular meshwork cells. Mol Vis, 15, 815–825. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hewitt AW, Bennett SL, Richards JE, Dimasi DP, Booth AP, Inglehearn C, … Mackey DA (2007). Myocilin Gly252Arg mutation and glaucoma of intermediate severity in Caucasian individuals. Arch Ophthalmol, 125(1), 98–104. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.1.98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hewitt AW, Mackey DA, & Craig JE (2008). Myocilin allele-specific glaucoma phenotype database. Hum Mutat, 29(2), 207–211. doi: 10.1002/humu.20634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hill SE, Cho H, Raut P, & Lieberman RL (2019). Calcium-ligand variants of the myocilin olfactomedin propeller selected from invertebrate phyla reveal cross-talk with N-terminal blade and surface helices. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol, 75(Pt 9), 817–824. doi: 10.1107/S205979831901074X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hill SE, Donegan RK, & Lieberman RL (2014). The glaucoma-associated olfactomedin domain of myocilin forms polymorphic fibrils that are constrained by partial unfolding and peptide sequence. J Mol Biol, 426(4), 921–935. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hill SE, Kwon MS, Martin MD, Suntharalingam A, Hazel A, Dickey CA, … Lieberman RL (2019). Stable calcium-free myocilin olfactomedin domain variants reveal challenges in differentiating between benign and glaucoma-causing mutations. J Biol Chem, 294(34), 12717–12728. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hill SE, Nguyen E, Donegan RK, Patterson-Orazem AC, Hazel A, Gumbart JC, & Lieberman RL (2017). Structure and Misfolding of the Flexible Tripartite Coiled-Coil Domain of Glaucoma-Associated Myocilin. Structure, 25(11), 1697–1707 e1695. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.09.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hogewind BF, Gaplovska-Kysela K, Theelen T, Cremers FP, Yam GH, Hoyng CB, & Mukhopadhyay A (2007). Identification and functional characterization of a novel MYOC mutation in two primary open angle glaucoma families from The Netherlands. Mol Vis, 13, 1793–1801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Huang C, Xie L, Wu Z, Cao Y, Zheng Y, Pang CP, & Zhang M (2018). Detection of mutations in MYOC, OPTN, NTF4, WDR36 and CYP1B1 in Chinese juvenile onset open-angle glaucoma using exome sequencing. Sci Rep, 8(1), 4498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22337-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Huang X, Li M, Guo X, Li S, Xiao X, Jia X, … Zhang Q (2014). Mutation analysis of seven known glaucoma-associated genes in Chinese patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 55(6), 3594–3602. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-13927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Huard DJ, Crowley VM, Du Y, Cordova RA, Sun Z, Tomlin MO, … Lieberman RL (2018). Trifunctional high-throughput screen identifies promising scaffold to inhibit Grp94 and treat myocilin-associated glaucoma. ACS Chem Biol, 13(4), 933–941. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b01083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Huard DJE, Crowley VM, Du Y, Cordova RA, Sun Z, Tomlin MO, … Lieberman RL (2018). Trifunctional High-Throughput Screen Identifies Promising Scaffold To Inhibit Grp94 and Treat Myocilin-Associated Glaucoma. ACS Chem Biol, 13(4), 933–941. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b01083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Huard DJE, Jonke AP, Torres MP, & Lieberman RL (2019). Different Grp94 components interact transiently with the myocilin olfactomedin domain in vitro to enhance or retard its amyloid aggregation. Sci Rep, 9(1), 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hulsman CA, De Jong PT, Lettink M, Van Duijn CM, Hofman A, & Bergen AA (2002). Myocilin mutations in a population-based sample of cases with open-angle glaucoma: the Rotterdam Study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 240(6), 468–474. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0455-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Iliev ME, Bodmer S, Gallati S, Lanz R, Sturmer J, Katsoulis K, … Sarra GM (2008). Glaucoma phenotype in a large Swiss pedigree with the myocilin Gly367Arg mutation. Eye (Lond), 22(7), 880–888. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ishikawa K, Funayama T, Ohtake Y, Tanino T, Kurosaka D, Suzuki K, … Mashima Y (2004). Novel MYOC gene mutation, Phe369Leu, in Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma detected by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. J Glaucoma, 13(6), 466–471. doi: 10.1097/0.ijg.0000138204.6d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Izumi K, Mashima Y, Obazawa M, Ohtake Y, Tanino T, Miyata H, … Iwata T (2003). Variants of the myocilin gene in Japanese patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res, 35(6), 345–350. doi: 10.1159/000074075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Jacobson N, Andrews M, Shepard AR, Nishimura D, Searby C, Fingert JH, … Sheffield VC (2001). Non-secretion of mutant proteins of the glaucoma gene myocilin in cultured trabecular meshwork cells and in aqueous humor. Hum Mol Genet, 10(2), 117–125. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.2.117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Jansson M, Marknell T, Tomic L, Larsson LI, & Wadelius C (2003). Allelic variants in the MYOC/TIGR gene in patients with primary open-angle, exfoliative glaucoma and unaffected controls. Ophthalmic Genet, 24(2), 103–110. doi: 10.1076/opge.24.2.103.13997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Jia LY, Gong B, Pang CP, Huang Y, Lam DS, Wang N, & Yam GH (2009). Correction of the disease phenotype of myocilin-causing glaucoma by a natural osmolyte. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 50(8), 3743–3749. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Jia LY, Tam PO, Chiang SW, Ding N, Chen LJ, Yam GH, … Wang NL (2009). Multiple gene polymorphisms analysis revealed a different profile of genetic polymorphisms of primary open-angle glaucoma in northern Chinese. Mol Vis, 15, 89–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Joe MK, Nakaya N, Abu-Asab M, & Tomarev SI (2015). Mutated myocilin and heterozygous Sod2 deficiency act synergistically in a mouse model of open-angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet, 24(12), 3322–3334. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Joe MK, Sohn S, Hur W, Moon Y, Choi YR, & Kee C (2003). Accumulation of mutant myocilins in ER leads to ER stress and potential cytotoxicity in human trabecular meshwork cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 312(3), 592–600. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.10.162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Joe MK, & Tomarev SI (2010). Expression of myocilin mutants sensitizes cells to oxidative stress-induced apoptosis: implication for glaucoma pathogenesis. Am J Pathol, 176(6), 2880–2890. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Kanagavalli J, Krishnadas SR, Pandaranayaka E, Krishnaswamy S, & Sundaresan P (2003). Evaluation and understanding of myocilin mutations in Indian primary open angle glaucoma patients. Mol Vis, 9, 606–614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kanagavalli J, Pandaranayaka PJ, Krishnadas SR, Krishnaswamy S, & Sundaresan P (2007). In vitro and in vivo study on the secretion of the Gly367Arg mutant myocilin protein. Mol Vis, 13, 1161–1168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alfoldi J, Wang Q, … MacArthur DG (2020). The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature, 581(7809), 434–443. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Kasetti RB, Phan TN, Millar JC, & Zode GS (2016). Expression of mutant myocilin induces abnormal intracellular accumulation of selected extracellular matrix proteins in the trabecular meshwork. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 57(14), 6058–6069. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, … Gordon MO (2002). The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 120(6), 701–713; discussion 829–730. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kathiresan S, & Srivastava D (2012). Genetics of human cardiovascular disease. Cell, 148(6), 1242–1257. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kee C, & Ahn BH (1997). TIGR gene in primary open-angle glaucoma and steroid-induced glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol, 11(2), 75–78. doi: 10.3341/kjo.1997.11.2.75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kennan AM, Mansergh FC, Fingert JH, Clark T, Ayuso C, Kenna PF, … Farrar GJ (1998). A novel Asp380Ala mutation in the GLC1A/myocilin gene in a family with juvenile onset primary open angle glaucoma. J Med Genet, 35(11), 957–960. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.11.957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kim BS, Savinova OV, Reedy MV, Martin J, Lun Y, Gan L, … Johnson RL (2001). Targeted Disruption of the Myocilin Gene (MYOC) Suggests that Human Glaucoma-Causing Mutations Are Gain of Function. Mol Cell Biol, 21(22), 7707–7713. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.22.7707-7713.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kitsos G, Petrou Z, Grigoriadou M, Samples JR, Hewitt AW, Kokotas H, … Petersen MB (2010). Primary open angle glaucoma due to T377M MYOC: Population mapping of a Greek founder mutation in Northwestern Greece. Clin Ophthalmol, 4, 171–178. doi: 10.2147/opth.s8974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Kubota R, Mashima Y, Ohtake Y, Tanino T, Kimura T, Hotta Y, … Shimizu N (2000). Novel mutations in the myocilin gene in Japanese glaucoma patients. Hum Mutat, 16(3), 270. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Kubota R, Noda S, Wang Y, Minoshima S, Asakawa S, Kudoh J, … Shimizu N (1997). A novel myosin-like protein (myocilin) expressed in the connecting cilium of the photoreceptor: molecular cloning, tissue expression, and chromosomal mapping. Genomics, 41(3), 360–369. doi: 10.1006/geno.1997.4682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kuchtey J, Chowdhury UR, Uptegraft CC, Fautsch MP, & Kuchtey RW (2013). A de novo MYOC mutation detected in juvenile open angle glaucoma associated with reduced myocilin protein in aqueous humor. Eur J Med Genet, 56(6), 292–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kulkarni NH, Karavanich CA, Atchley WR, & Anholt RR (2000). Characterization and differential expression of a human gene family of olfactomedin-related proteins. Genet Res, 76(1), 41–50. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300004584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Lam DS, Leung YF, Chua JK, Baum L, Fan DS, Choy KW, & Pang CP (2000). Truncations in the TIGR gene in individuals with and without primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 41(6), 1386–1391. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10798654 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Lei L, Li S, Liu X, & Zhang C (2019). The clinical feature of myocilin Y437H mutation in a Chinese family with primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol, 103(10), 1524–1529. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Li CM, Zhang YH, Ye RH, Yi CX, Zhong YM, Cao D, & Liu X (2014). Anticipation, anti-glaucoma drug treatment response and phenotype of a Chinese family with glaucoma caused by the Pro370Leu myocilin mutation. Int J Ophthalmol, 7(1), 44–50. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.01.08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Liao RF, Zhong ZL, Ye MJ, Han LY, Ye DQ, & Chen JJ (2016). Identification of Mutations in Myocilin and Beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 3 Genes in a Chinese Family with Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. Chin Med J (Engl), 129(23), 2810–2815. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.194641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Lieberman RL, & Ma MT (2021). Molecular Insights into Myocilin and Its Glaucoma-Causing Misfolded Olfactomedin Domain Variants. Acc Chem Res. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lim P, Lichter PR, Higashi M, Downs CA, & Richards JE (2003). Septuagenarian’s phenotype leads to ascertainment of familial MYOC gene mutation. J Glaucoma, 12(2), 98–103. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200304000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Liu W, Liu Y, Challa P, Herndon LW, Wiggs JL, Girkin CA, … Hauser MA (2012). Low prevalence of myocilin mutations in an African American population with primary open-angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 18, 2241–2246. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Liu Y, & Allingham RR (2017). Major review: Molecular genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma. Exp Eye Res, 160, 62–84. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Liu Y, & Vollrath D (2004). Reversal of mutant myocilin non-secretion and cell killing: implications for glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet, 13(11), 1193–1204. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Lopez-Martinez F, Lopez-Garrido MP, Sanchez-Sanchez F, Campos-Mollo E, Coca-Prados M, & Escribano J (2007). Role of MYOC and OPTN sequence variations in Spanish patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 13, 862–872. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Lu H, Chen Y, Kong Y, Liu X, Li N, Zhang S, & Xu H (2020). Glaucoma phenotype in a large Chinese family with myocilin Val251Ala mutation. Genomics. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Lynch JM, Li B, Katoli P, Xiang C, Leehy B, Rangaswamy N, … Chen A (2018). Binding of a glaucoma-associated myocilin variant to the alphaB-crystallin chaperone impedes protein clearance in trabecular meshwork cells. J Biol Chem, 293(52), 20137–20156. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Mabuchi F, Yamagata Z, Kashiwagi K, Tang S, Iijima H, & Tsukahara S (2001). Analysis of myocilin gene mutations in Japanese patients with normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Genet, 59(4), 263–268. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.590408.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. MacArthur DG, Manolio TA, Dimmock DP, Rehm HL, Shendure J, Abecasis GR, … Gunter C (2014). Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease. Nature, 508(7497), 469–476. doi: 10.1038/nature13127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Mackey DA, Healey DL, Fingert JH, Coote MA, Wong TL, Wilkinson CH, … Craig JE (2003). Glaucoma phenotype in pedigrees with the myocilin Thr377Met mutation. Arch Ophthalmol, 121(8), 1172–1180. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.8.1172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Mansergh FC, Kenna PF, Ayuso C, Kiang AS, Humphries P, & Farrar GJ (1998). Novel mutations in the TIGR gene in early and late onset open angle glaucoma. Hum Mutat, 11(3), 244–251. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Markandaya M, Ramesh TK, Selvaraju V, Dorairaj SK, Prakash R, Shetty J, & Kumar A (2004). Genetic analysis of an Indian family with members affected with juvenile-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Genet, 25(1), 11–23. doi: 10.1076/opge.25.1.11.28995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Marzec M, Eletto D, & Argon Y (2012). Grp94: An Hsp90-like protein specialized for protein folding and quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1823(3), 774–787. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.10.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Mathis S, Goizet C, Soulages A, Vallat JM, & Masson GL (2019). Genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A review. J Neurol Sci, 399, 217–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.02.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. McDonald KK, Abramson K, Beltran MA, Ramirez MG, Alvarez M, Ventura A, … Allingham RR (2010). Myocilin and optineurin coding variants in Hispanics of Mexican descent with POAG. J Hum Genet, 55(10), 697–700. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2010.91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. McDowell CM, Luan T, Zhang Z, Putliwala T, Wordinger RJ, Millar JC, … Clark AF (2012). Mutant human myocilin induces strain specific differences in ocular hypertension and optic nerve damage in mice. Exp Eye Res, 100, 65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2012.04.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Melki R, Belmouden A, Brezin A, & Garchon HJ (2003). Myocilin analysis by DHPLC in French POAG patients: increased prevalence of Q368X mutation. Hum Mutat, 22(2), 179. doi: 10.1002/humu.9165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Melki R, Idhajji A, Driouiche S, Hassani M, Boukabboucha A, Akhayat O, … Belmouden A (2003). Mutational analysis of the Myocilin gene in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in Morocco. Ophthalmic Genet, 24(3), 153–160. doi: 10.1076/opge.24.3.153.15610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Mengkegale M, Fuse N, Miyazawa A, Takahashi K, Seimiya M, Yasui T, … Nishida K (2008). Presence of myocilin sequence variants in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 14, 413–417. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Michels-Rautenstrauss K, Mardin C, Wakili N, Junemann AM, Villalobos L, Mejia C, … Rautenstrauss BW. (2002). Novel mutations in the MYOC/GLC1A gene in a large group of glaucoma patients. Hum Mutat, 20(6), 479–480. doi: 10.1002/humu.9092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Michels-Rautenstrauss KG, Mardin CY, Budde WM, Liehr T, Polansky J, Nguyen T, … Rautenstrauss BW (1998). Juvenile open angle glaucoma: fine mapping of the TIGR gene to 1q24.3-q25.2 and mutation analysis. Hum Genet, 102(1), 103–106. doi: 10.1007/s004390050661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Millá E, Mañé B, Duch S, Hernan I, Borràs E, Planas E, … Gamundi MJ (2013). Survey of familial glaucoma shows a high incidence of cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily B, polypeptide 1 (CYP1B1) mutations in non-consanguineous congenital forms in a Spanish population. Mol Vis, 19, 1707–1722. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Mimivati Z, Nurliza K, Marini M, & Liza-Sharmini A (2014). Identification of MYOC gene mutation and polymorphism in a large Malay family with juvenile-onset open angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 20, 714–723. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Moon S, Kim N, & Lee J (2020). Clinical and genetic analysis of Ser341Pro MYOC variant in a Korean family with primary open angle glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol, 13(11), 1689–1696. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.11.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Morissette J, Clépet C, Moisan S, Dubois S, Winstall E, Vermeeren D, … Raymond V (1998). Homozygotes carrying an autosomal dominant TIGR mutation do not manifest glaucoma. Nat Genet, 19(4), 319–321. doi: 10.1038/1203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Mukhopadhyay A, Acharya M, Mukherjee S, Ray J, Choudhury S, Khan M, & Ray K (2002). Mutations in MYOC gene of Indian primary open angle glaucoma patients. Mol Vis, 8, 442–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. O’Gorman L, Cree AJ, Ward D, Griffiths HL, Sood R, Denniston AK, … Gibson J (2019). Comprehensive sequencing of the myocilin gene in a selected cohort of severe primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Sci Rep, 9(1), 3100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38760-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Orwig SD, Perry CW, Kim LY, Turnage KC, Zhang R, Vollrath D, … Lieberman RL (2012). Amyloid fibril formation by the glaucoma-associated olfactomedin domain of myocilin. J Mol Biol, 421(2–3), 242–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.12.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Pang CP, Leung YF, Fan B, Baum L, Tong WC, Lee WS, … Lam DS (2002). TIGR/MYOC gene sequence alterations in individuals with and without primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 43(10), 3231–3235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Park J, Kim M, Park CK, Chae H, Lee S, Kim Y, … Park SH (2016). Molecular analysis of myocilin and optineurin genes in Korean primary glaucoma patients. Mol Med Rep, 14(3), 2439–2448. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Patterson-Orazem AC, Hill SE, Wang Y, Dominic IM, Hall CK, & Lieberman RL (2019). Differential misfolding properties of glaucoma-associated olfactomedin domains from humans and mice. Biochemistry, 58(13), 1718–1727. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Petersen MB, Kitsos G, Samples JR, Gaudette ND, Economou-Petersen E, Sykes R, … Wirtz MK (2006). A large GLC1C Greek family with a myocilin T377M mutation: inheritance and phenotypic variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 47(2), 620–625. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Polansky JR, Fauss DJ, Chen P, Chen H, Lutjen-Drecoll E, Johnson D, … Nguyen TD (1997). Cellular pharmacology and molecular biology of the trabecular meshwork inducible glucocorticoid response gene product. Ophthalmologica, 211(3), 126–139. doi: 10.1159/000310780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Povoa CA, Malta RF, Rezende Mde M, de Melo KF, & Giannella-Neto D (2006). Correlation between genotype and phenotype in primary open angle glaucoma of Brazilian families with mutations in exon 3 of the TIGR/MYOC gene. Arq Bras Oftalmol, 69(3), 289–297. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492006000300002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Puska P, Lemmela S, Kristo P, Sankila EM, & Jarvela I (2005). Penetrance and phenotype of the Thr377Met Myocilin mutation in a large Finnish family with juvenile- and adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Genet, 26(1), 17–23. doi: 10.1080/13816810590918208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Rakhmanov VV, Nikitina N, Zakharova FM, Astakhov Iu S, Kvasova MD, Vasil’ev VB, … Mandel’shtam M (2005). [Mutations and polymorphisms in the genes for myocilin and optineur in as the risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma]. Genetika, 41(11), 1567–1574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Rangachari K, Bankoti N, Shyamala N, Michael D, Sameer Ahmed Z, Chandrasekaran P, & Sekar K (2019). Glaucoma Pred: Glaucoma prediction based on Myocilin genotype and phenotype information. Genomics, 111(4), 696–699. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Resch ZT, & Fautsch MP (2009). Glaucoma-associated myocilin: a better understanding but much more to learn. Exp Eye Res, 88(4), 704–712. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.08.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Richards J (1998). Novel trabecular meshwork inducible glucocorticoid response mutation in an eight-generation juvenile-onset primary open-angle glaucoma pedigree. Ophthalmology, 105(9), 1698–1707. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(98)99041-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, … Committee, A. L. Q. A. (2015). Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med, 17(5), 405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Rohen JW, Lutjen-Drecoll E, Flugel C, Meyer M, & Grierson I (1993). Ultrastructure of the trabecular meshwork in untreated cases of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Exp Eye Res, 56(6), 683–692. doi: 10.1006/exer.1993.1085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Rose R, Balakrishnan A, Muthusamy K, Arumugam P, Shanmugam S, & Gopalswamy J (2011). Myocilin mutations among POAG patients from two populations of Tamil Nadu, South India, a comparative analysis. Mol Vis, 17, 3243–3253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Rozsa FW, Shimizu S, Lichter PR, Johnson AT, Othman MI, Scott K, … Richards JE (1998). GLC1A mutations point to regions of potential functional importance on the TIGR/MYOC protein. Mol Vis, 4, 20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Senatorov V, Malyukova I, Fariss R, Wawrousek EF, Swaminathan S, Sharan SK, & Tomarev S (2006). Expression of mutated mouse myocilin induces open-angle glaucoma in transgenic mice. J Neurosci, 26(46), 11903–11914. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3020-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Shepard AR, Jacobson N, Millar JC, Pang IH, Steely HT, Searby CC, … Clark AF (2007). Glaucoma-causing myocilin mutants require the Peroxisomal targeting signal-1 receptor (PTS1R) to elevate intraocular pressure. Hum Mol Genet, 16(6), 609–617. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Shimizu S, Lichter PR, Johnson AT, Zhou Z, Higashi M, Gottfredsdottir M, … Richards JE (2000). Age-dependent prevalence of mutations at the GLC1A locus in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol, 130(2), 165–177. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00536-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Souzeau E, Burdon KP, Ridge B, Dubowsky A, Ruddle JB, & Craig JE (2016). A novel de novo Myocilin variant in a patient with sporadic juvenile open angle glaucoma. BMC Med Genet, 17, 30. doi: 10.1186/s12881-016-0291-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Souzeau E, Glading J, Ridge B, Wechsler D, Chehade M, Dubowsky A, … Craig JE (2015). Predictive genetic testing in minors for Myocilin juvenile onset open angle glaucoma. Clin Genet, 88(6), 584–588. doi: 10.1111/cge.12558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Stoilova D, Child A, Brice G, Crick RP, Fleck BW, & Sarfarazi M (1997). Identification of a new ‘TIGR’ mutation in a family with juvenile-onset primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Genet, 18(3), 109–118. doi: 10.3109/13816819709057124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Stoilova D, Child A, Brice G, Desai T, Barsoum-Homsy M, Ozdemir N, … Sarfarazi M (1998). Novel TIGR/MYOC mutations in families with juvenile onset primary open angle glaucoma. J Med Genet, 35(12), 989–992. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.12.989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Stokes WH (1940). Hereditary Primary Glaucoma: a pedigree with five generations. Archives of Ophthalmology, 24(5), 885–909. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1940.00870050035002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  152. Stone EM, Fingert JH, Alward WL, Nguyen TD, Polansky JR, Sunden SL, … Sheffield VC (1997). Identification of a gene that causes primary open angle glaucoma. Science, 275(5300), 668–670. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5300.668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Stothert AR, Fontaine SN, Sabbagh JJ, & Dickey CA (2016). Targeting the ER-autophagy system in the trabecular meshwork to treat glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res, 144, 38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.08.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Stothert AR, Suntharalingam A, Huard DJ, Fontaine SN, Crowley VM, Mishra S, … Dickey CA (2014). Exploiting the interaction between Grp94 and aggregated myocilin to treat glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet, 23(24), 6470–6480. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Suntharalingam A, Abisambra JF, O’Leary JC 3rd, Koren J 3rd, Zhang B, Joe MK, … Dickey CA (2012). Glucose-regulated protein 94 triage of mutant myocilin through endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation subverts a more efficient autophagic clearance mechanism. J. Biol. Chem, 287(48), 40661–40669. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.384800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Suntharalingam A, Abisambra JF, O’Leary JC, Koren J, Zhang B, Joe MK, … Dickey CA (2012). Glucose-regulated protein 94 triage of mutant myocilin through endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation subverts a more efficient autophagic clearance mechanism. J Biol Chem, 287(48), 40661–40669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Suzuki Y, Shirato S, Taniguchi F, Ohara K, Nishimaki K, & Ohta S (1997). Mutations in the TIGR gene in familial primary open-angle glaucoma in Japan. Am J Hum Genet, 61(5), 1202–1204. doi: 10.1086/301612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Svidnicki PV, Braghini CA, Costa VP, Schimiti RB, de Vasconcellos JPC, & de Melo MB (2018). Occurrence of MYOC and CYP1B1 variants in juvenile open angle glaucoma Brazilian patients. Ophthalmic Genet, 39(6), 717–724. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2018.1546405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Tamm ER (2002). Myocilin and glaucoma: facts and ideas. Prog Retin Eye Res, 21(4), 395–428. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12150989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Taniguchi F (1999). Clinical Phenotype of a Japanese Family With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Caused by a Pro370Leu Mutation in the MYOC/TIGR Gene. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 43(2), 80–84. doi: 10.1016/s0021-5155(98)00074-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Taniguchi F, Suzuki Y, Shirato S, & Araie M (2000). The Gly367Arg mutation in the myocilin gene causes adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 44(4), 445–448. doi: 10.1016/S0021-5155(00)00201-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, & Cheng CY (2014). Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology, 121(11), 2081–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. van der Heide CJ, Alward WLM, Flamme-Wiese M, Riker M, Syed NA, Anderson MG, … Fingert JH (2018). Histochemical analysis of glaucoma caused by a myocilin mutation in a human donor eye. Ophthalmol Glaucoma, 1(2), 132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Vasconcellos JP, Melo MB, Costa VP, Tsukumo DM, Bassères DS, Bordin S, … Costa FF (2000). Novel mutation in the MYOC gene in primary open glaucoma patients. J Med Genet, 37(4), 301–303. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.4.301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Vaser R, Adusumalli S, Leng SN, Sikic M, & Ng PC (2016). SIFT missense predictions for genomes. Nat Protoc, 11(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Vázquez MC, Herrero MVO, Bastús MB, & Pérez DV (2009). Mutations in the third exon of the MYOC gene in Spanish patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Genetics, 21(2), 109–115. doi: 10.1076/1381-6810(200006)2121-8ft109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Vincent AL, Billingsley G, Buys Y, Levin AV, Priston M, Trope G, … Héon E (2002). Digenic inheritance of early-onset glaucoma: CYP1B1, a potential modifier gene. Am J Hum Genet, 70(2), 448–460. doi: 10.1086/338709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Vollrath D, & Liu Y (2006). Temperature sensitive secretion of mutant myocilins. Exp Eye Res, 82(6), 1030–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Wang C, & Balch WE (2018). Bridging Genomics to Phenomics at Atomic Resolution through Variation Spatial Profiling. Cell Rep, 24(8), 2013–2028 e2016. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Wang F, Li Y, Lan L, Li B, Lin L, Lu X, & Li J (2015). Ser341Pro MYOC gene mutation in a family with primary open-angle glaucoma. Int J Mol Med, 35(5), 1230–1236. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Wang H, Li M, Zhang Z, Xue H, Chen X, & Ji Y (2019). Physiological function of myocilin and its role in the pathogenesis of glaucoma in the trabecular meshwork (Review). Int J Mol Med, 43(2), 671–681. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Wang L, Zhuo Y, Liu B, Huang S, Hou F, & Ge J (2007). Pro370Leu mutant myocilin disturbs the endoplasm reticulum stress response and mitochondrial membrane potential in human trabecular meshwork cells. Mol Vis, 13, 618–625. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Waryah AM, Narsani AK, Sheikh SA, Shaikh H, & Shahani MY (2013). The novel heterozygous Thr377Arg MYOC mutation causes severe Juvenile Open Angle Glaucoma in a large Pakistani family. Gene, 528(2), 356–359. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Wei YT, Duan S, Ge J, Zhuo YH, Ling YL, Lin MK, & Gao QY (2005). [A preliminary study on gene mutation and its function in a large family (GZ.1 pedigree) with open-angle glaucoma]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi, 41(12), 1068–1075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Wei YT, Li YQ, Bai YJ, Wang M, Chen JH, Ge J, & Zhuo YH (2011). Pro370Leu myocilin mutation in a Chinese pedigree with juvenile-onset open angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 17, 1449–1456. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Weinreb RN, Aung T, & Medeiros FA (2014). The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. Jama, 311(18), 1901–1911. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Weisschuh N, Neumann D, Wolf C, Wissinger B, & Gramer E (2005). Prevalence of myocilin and optineurin sequence variants in German normal tension glaucoma patients. Mol Vis, 11, 284–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Whigham BT, Williams SE, Liu Y, Rautenbach RM, Carmichael TR, Wheeler J, … Allingham RR (2011). Myocilin mutations in black South Africans with POAG. Mol Vis, 17, 1064–1069. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Wiggs JL (2007). Genetic etiologies of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 125(1), 30–37. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.1.30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Wiggs JL, Allingham RR, Vollrath D, Jones KH, De La Paz M, Kern J, … Haines JL (1998). Prevalence of mutations in TIGR/Myocilin in patients with adult and juvenile primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Hum Genet, 63(5), 1549–1552. doi: 10.1086/302098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Wiggs JL, & Pasquale LR (2017). Genetics of glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet, 26(R1), R21–R27. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Wiggs JL, & Vollrath D (2001). Molecular and clinical evaluation of a patient hemizygous for TIGR/MYOC. Arch Ophthalmol, 119(11), 1674–1678. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.11.1674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Wilkinson CH, van der Straaten D, Craig JE, Coote MA, McCartney PJ, Stankovich J, … Mackey DA (2003). Tonography demonstrates reduced facility of outflow of aqueous humor in myocilin mutation carriers. J Glaucoma, 12(3), 237–242. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200306000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Williams SE, Carmichael TR, Wainstein T, Hobbs A, & Ramsay M (2015). MYOC mutations in black south african patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: genetic testing and cascade screening. Ophthalmic Genet, 36(1), 31–38. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2014.972520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Williams-Lyn D, Flanagan J, Buys Y, Trope GE, Fingert J, Stone EM, & Héon E (2000). The genetic aspects of adult-onset glaucoma: a perspective from the Greater Toronto area. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 35(1), 12–17. doi: 10.1016/s0008-4182(00)80103-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Willoughby CE, Chan LL, Herd S, Billingsley G, Noordeh N, Levin AV, … Heon E (2004). Defining the pathogenicity of optineurin in juvenile open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 45(9), 3122–3130. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Wirtz MK, Konstas AG, Samples JR, Kaltsos K, Economou A, Dimopoulos A, … Petersen MB (2008). Myocilin variations and familial glaucoma in Taxiarchis, a small Greek village. Mol Vis, 14, 774–781. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Wirtz MK, Samples JR, Choi D, & Gaudette ND (2007). Clinical features associated with an Asp380His Myocilin mutation in a US family with primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol, 144(1), 75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.03.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Yam GH, Gaplovska-Kysela K, Zuber C, & Roth J (2007a). Aggregated myocilin induces russell bodies and causes apoptosis: implications for the pathogenesis of myocilin-caused primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Pathol, 170(1), 100–109. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Yam GH, Gaplovska-Kysela K, Zuber C, & Roth J (2007b). Sodium 4-phenylbutyrate acts as a chemical chaperone on misfolded myocilin to rescue cells from endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 48(4), 1683–1690. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Yang Y, Abdulatef A, Zhang L, Jiang H, Zeng Z, Li H, & Xia X (2020). Cross-talk between MYOC p. Y437H mutation and TGF-β2 in the pathology of glaucoma. Int J Med Sci, 17(8), 1062–1070. doi: 10.7150/ijms.43614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Yang Y, Shi Y, Huang X, Li X, Ye Z, Shuai P, … Gong B (2015). Identification of a novel MYOC mutation in a Chinese family with primary open-angle glaucoma. Gene, 571(2), 188–193. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.06.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Yao YH, Wang YQ, Fang WF, Zhang L, Yang JH, & Zhu YH (2018). A recurrent G367R mutation in MYOC associated with juvenile open angle glaucoma in a large Chinese family. Int J Ophthalmol, 11(3), 369–374. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.04 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Yoon SJ, Kim HS, Moon JI, Lim JM, & Joo CK (1999). Mutations of the TIGR/MYOC gene in primary open-angle glaucoma in Korea. Am J Hum Genet, 64(6), 1775–1778. doi: 10.1086/302407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Young TK, Souzeau E, Liu L, Kearns LS, Burdon KP, Craig JE, & Ruddle JB (2012). Compound heterozygote myocilin mutations in a pedigree with high prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 18, 3064–3069. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Youngblood H, Hauser MA, & Liu Y (2019). Update on the genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma. Exp Eye Res, 188, 107795. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Zadoo S, Nguyen A, Zode G, & Hulleman JD (2016). A novel luciferase assay for sensitively monitoring myocilin variants in cell culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 57(4), 1939–1950. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Zgaga L, Hayward C, Vatavuk Z, Bencic G, Zemunik T, Valkovic A, … Rudan I (2008). High prevalence of glaucoma in Veli Brgud, Croatia, is caused by a dominantly inherited T377M mutation in the MYOC gene. Br J Ophthalmol, 92(11), 1567–1568. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.143552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Zhao X, Yang C, Tong Y, Zhang X, Xu L, & Li Y (2010). Identification a novel MYOC gene mutation in a Chinese family with juvenile-onset open angle glaucoma. Mol Vis, 16, 1728–1735. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Zhou XM, Yin Y, Fan N, Cheng HB, Li XH, Wang Y, … Liu XY (2013). Single nucleotide polymorphism of MYOC affected the severity of primary open angle glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol, 6(3), 264–268. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.03.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Zhou Y, Grinchuk O, & Tomarev SI (2008). Transgenic mice expressing the Tyr437His mutant of human myocilin protein develop glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 49(5), 1932–1939. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Zhou Z, & Vollrath D (1999). A cellular assay distinguishes normal and mutant TIGR/myocilin protein. Hum Mol Genet, 8(12), 2221–2228. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.12.2221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Zhuo YH, Wei YT, Bai YJ, Duan S, Lin MK, Saragovi HU, & Ge J (2008). Pro370Leu MYOC gene mutation in a large Chinese family with juvenile-onset open angle glaucoma: correlation between genotype and phenotype. Mol Vis, 14, 1533–1539. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Zillig M, Wurm A, Grehn FJ, Russell P, & Tamm ER (2005). Overexpression and properties of wild-type and Tyr437His mutated myocilin in the eyes of transgenic mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 46(1), 223–234. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Zode GS, Kuehn MH, Nishimura DY, Searby CC, Mohan K, Grozdanic SD, … Sheffield VC (2011). Reduction of ER stress via a chemical chaperone prevents disease phenotypes in a mouse model of primary open angle glaucoma. J Clin Invest, 121(9), 3542–3553. doi: 10.1172/JCI58183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supinfo

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable – no new data generated. Clinical data collected in Supplemental Data Table S1.

RESOURCES