Skip to main content
Frontiers in Pediatrics logoLink to Frontiers in Pediatrics
. 2021 Jul 8;9:543078. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.543078

Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumors in Children: A Clinical Retrospective Study on 19 Cases

Min Da 1,, Bo Qian 1,, Xuming Mo 1,*, Cheng Xu 1, Haiyan Wu 2, Bin Jiang 3, Wei Peng 1, Jirong Qi 1, Jian Sun 1, Kaihong Wu 1
PMCID: PMC8295553  PMID: 34307241

Abstract

Background: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMFT) is a rare neoplasm mainly affecting children and young adults. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical features and treatment alternatives of childhood inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors.

Methods: A total of 19 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with IMT between December 2008 and October 2018 were included. Collected data were demographic information, main complaints, tumor characteristics, treatment, pathological results, immunohistochemical analysis, and prognosis.

Results: The male/female ratio was 13:6. The mean age at disease onset was 44.9 ± 33.9 months (range 4 to 111 months). The mean tumor size was 6.5 ± 4.0 cm (range 1.2 to 17.0 cm). The most common site was the abdomen (13/19). The most commonly used detection tool was CT. Eleven patients (57.9%) had aggressive tumor growth, including eight receiving extensive resection and three receiving palliative resection due to high local invasiveness and postoperative chemotherapy. Eight cases whose tumors were completely enveloped received complete resection. Immunohistochemistry was performed for 17 patients and ALK positivity was found in 11 patients. Despite three children lost to follow-up, sixteen patients were followed up for 6 to 132 months (average 63.9 months, median 66 months). Of which, twelve children survived with no evidence of IMT, and four cases (21%) showed local recurrences (two of them died). No distant metastasis was detected.

Conclusions: IMT is rare in children with various locations, mostly appearing in the abdomen. Whether the tumor could be completely removed, the location and the invasiveness of surrounding tissues might be highly prognosis-related.

Keywords: inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, children, immunohistochemistry, recurrence, surgery

Introduction

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a kind of mesenchymal tumor characterized with proliferation of myofibroblast spindle cells and prominent infiltration of plasmocytes and/or lymphocytes. IMT is rare and its true incidence and prevalence remains unclear (1). Commonly detected in the lung, retroperitoneal space, and pelvic and abdominal soft tissue, IMT usually attacks children and young adults. Pathologically, IMT tends to be locally invasive or recurrent, and rarely metastasizes (2, 3). Herein, we analyzed the clinical data of 19 children with IMT diagnosed at Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Literature was also reviewed to reveal its clinical features, imaging manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

Materials and Methods

The study analyzed the records of 19 patients confirmed as IMT at Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between December 2008 and October 2018 were obtained. Collected data were demographic information, main complaints, tumor characteristics, treatment, pathological results, immunohistochemical analysis, and prognosis. This retrospective study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from the [individual(s) AND/OR minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin] for the publication of any potentially identifiable data included in this article.

Chi-square test (for categorical variables) was performed on SPSS 18.0. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The 19 children pathologically diagnosed with IMT, included 13 males and 6 females (average age 44.9 ± 33.9 months, range 4 to 111 months). Tumor locations varied largely, mostly in abdominal organs. Twelve cases showed abdominal distension, abdominal pain, vomiting, bloody stool, etc. Two cases with chest lesions and two cases with lung IMTs symptomized by cough, dyspnea and chest pain. One patient with tumor in chest wall presented local swelling and mass. One case with rectum polyp showed hematochezia. And one case of glottic IMT complained of hoarseness and difficult breathing at night. Despite three children who were lost to follow-up, sixteen patients were followed up for 6 to 132 months (average 63.9 months, median 66 months). These data were listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic data and clinic characteristics.

Case Gender Age (month) Presentation Location Treatment Recurrence Follow-up Status
1 Female 35 Abdominal pain Colon Complete excision None 131 Alive
2 Male 59 Abdominal mass Abdomen Palliative resection,
chemotherapy
20 month after surgery 132 Alive with residual tumor
3 Male 110 Hoarseness, nocturnal, dyspnea Glottis Extensive excision 4 months after surgery 102 Alive
4 Male 6 Hematochezia Colon Extensive excision - lost -
5 Male 27 Pulmonary mass Lung Complete excision - lost -
6 Female 31 Abdominal pain Omentum majus Complete excision None 82 Alive
7 Male 31 Emesis, abdominal pain, fever Ileum Extensive excision None 78 Alive
8 Male 36 Abdominal mass Omentum majus Complete excision None 77 Alive
9 Female 20 Abdominal pain Colon Complete excision None 69 Alive
10 Female 57 Abdominal pain Abdomen Extensive excision None 67 Alive
11 Male 5 Mass of chest wall Abdomen Extensive excision None 65 Alive
12 Male 4 Abdominal distension, emesis Small intestine Extensive excision None 62 Alive
13 Female 38 Abdominal pain Omentum majus Complete excision None 51 Alive
14 Male 111 Cough Thorax Palliative resection,
chemotherapy
1 month after surgery 13 Dead
15 Male 99 Hematochezia Rectum Extensive excision - lost -
16 Male 57 Cough, fever, dyspnea Thorax Palliative resection,
chemotherapy
1 month after surgery 6 Dead
17 Male 57 Abdominal pain, hematochezia Colon Extensive excision None 40 Alive
18 Female 4 Emesis Omentum majus Complete excision None 32 Alive
19 Male 66 Cough Lung Complete excision None 15 Alive

CT was the most frequently used detection tool. Ten cases were confirmed with two or more imaging methods. CT was performed in 16 cases, ultrasound in 9 cases, colonoscopy in 1 case and electronic laryngoscope in 1 case. CT manifestations were often atypical, with patchy high-density shadows seen in heterogeneous masses. All patients underwent WBC and CRP examinations. Leukocytes and/or CRP (leukocytes increased in 4 children (14.27–25.99/L) increased in 10 children, and CRP increased in 7 children (12–179mg/L)]. Tumor markers (including NSE, AFP, CEA, CA199) were examined in 11 cases; NSE increased in 4 children, and AFP increased in 1 patient.

Tumor sizes ranged from 1.2 to 17.0 cm (average 6.5 ± 4.0 cm). All cases received surgery. In our series, fifteen tumors (78.9%) were localized within a single organ. Four tumors extended beyond a single organ at the time of presentation. In eleven cases showing invasive tumor, eight cases underwent extensive resection (tumor in one case showed ruptured capsule and implantation into the abdominal cavity), and other three cases extended beyond a single organ received palliative resection and postoperative alternative AVP regimen (Epirubicin + vindesine + cis-platinum complexes) or IEV regimen (etoposide + ifosfamide + leurocristine). Eight cases with encapsulated tumors received complete resection.

Tumors were round, oval or irregularly lobed in appearance, and the cut surfaces were gray, red, or dark red. Electron microscopy showed proliferation of spindle cells, mostly distributed in a bundle, and infiltration of inflammatory cells. Immunohistochemistry was performed in 17 patients, with 11 cases (11/17) demonstrating ALK reactivity. The results of all sample that test for Vimentin were positive (16/16), and all samples but one (16/17) were positive to varying degrees for Ki-67. The results of other markers were highly variable (Table 2).

Table 2.

Immunohistochemistry results.

Case ALK Vimentin Dsemin SMA S-100 LCA CD34 Ki-67 CK CD68 CD117
1 / / / / / / / / / / /
2 / / / / / /
3 + + / / / <20% + / /
4 + + / / / + 1% + ± + ±
5 + + ± / / / 10% + /
6 / / / / / / / / / / /
7 + + ± / / / - 5% + + +
8 + + ± / / ± 15% + +
9 + + ± / 10% + ± ±
10 + + / 15% + ± +
11 + ± / / 10% + +
12 + + + / / 25% + ± +
13 + + / - / - ± / / /
14 + + + / 20–70% + + /
15 + + ± + + 30% + ± + /
16 + ± + 75% + / /
17 + / ± /
18 + + + + 10% + +
19 + + ± 10% + + / /

Except for patients lost to follow-up, all four recurrences were observed in children (4/9) with aggressive tumors, and none in children (0/7) with intactly encapsulated tumors. Besides, recurrence rate was much lower in IMTs confined inside a single organ (1/12) than in those extending beyond a single organ (3/4) –p = 0.027). Glottic IMT recurring within 4 months after surgery was treated with reoperation and has been tumor free for 98 months with close follow-up. One case with lesions beyond the omentum to the intestine, bladder or colon at the time of presentation underwent incomplete resection and received postoperative chemotherapy, who was treated with several additional surgeries due to recurrences and has been close follow-up with residual tumor for 132 months. Incomplete resection was performed in two children suffering from thoracic masses which behaved aggressively and were closely adjacent to lung, pericardium, aorta, vena cava and other mediastinal structures. Both of them had regular postoperative chemotherapy, but both died of relapse at 6 and 13 months after surgery, respectively.

Discussion

IMT is a unique tumor that can exist in any anatomical site and has affinity for children's lungs, soft tissues and abdominal organs. IMT may arise from infectious diseases, abnormal repair, EB virus or special bacterial infections, excessive inflammatory reactions after surgery, other malignancies or autoimmune diseases (4). However, little research is available to support or refute any of the above etiologies. The mechanism and pathogenesis of IMT remains elusive.

The gender ratio varies in different cohorts in previous reports and male predominance was found in our cohort (male: female, 13: 6) (57). Kovach (8) and Tutku Soyer (7) had reported that lung is the most common site of IMT. Bute in our cohort, IMT was mostly found in the abdominal parts (13/19), including intestine (7 cases), omentum (4 cases), and left upper abdomen (1 case). The other case showed metastasis from the omentum to the intestine, bladder or colon at the time of presentation. This result is consistent with that reported by Dalton et al. (9).

The clinical symptoms of IMT are usually organ-specific. CT examination is the most reliable diagnostic method. CT examination was performed before operation in 16 children, which can guide the formulation of surgical plan. The results of laboratory tests vary widely. Ten children showed increased leukocytes and/or CRP, which returned to normal after surgical resection, except in two of them undergoing palliative surgery. Therefore, these lab tests are not reliable for preoperative diagnosis of IMT, but perhaps for predicting its recurrence. Tumor markers we tested are also not specific to IMTS.

The final diagnosis still depends on pathological and immunohistochemical results. Approximately 50% of IMTs carry ALK gene rearrangement and overexpressed ALK. In our patients, 11 cases were immunohistochemically ALK-positive 57.9% (11/19), and this proportion is similar to that mentioned in the primary reports (5). Antonescu et al. (10) found that more than 90% of children with IMT demonstrated gene rearrangement (ALK gene, ROS1 gene, RET), which provides a possibility of developing targeted treatment of IMT. In recent years, ALK inhibitors such as crizotinib have achieved promising results in the treatment of IMT (1113). But so far, complete surgical resection remains the first choice (14, 15). Craig et al. (16) recently reported a group of cases with ALK-positive IMTs that received ALK inhibitor treatment before or after surgery and obtained a curative response. All of our patients underwent surgical treatment. Sixteen children received completely resection, while three cases received palliative resection due to local invasion to adjacent tissues and organs and subsequent postoperative chemotherapy.

Characterized by its rare local recurrence and metastasis, IMT is considered moderately malignant and has favorable prognosis (1719). In the initial surgery, complete excision of tumors with clear surgical margins can prevent recurrence (9). The recurrence rate varies with lesion site, from <2% in tumors confined to the lung to 25% in extrapulmonary lesions, such as multinodular intra-abdominal tumors in delicate anatomical organs (e.g., larynx or trachea) and distant metastasis is rare (2, 20). Excluding three cases lost to follow-up, long-term survival of twelve patients was achieved in our cohort and none of the cases receiving complete resection experienced recurrence. One of the patients received extensive excision relapsed. The recurrence might due to residual tumor tissue at surgical margin during primary surgery since the procedure was difficult to perform at larynx. Secondary extended resection under electronic laryngoscope was taken immediately since revealed, and no evidence of further recurrence was found for 98 months. Other three recurrences were found in patients receiving palliative resection. The patient displayed massive invasion of recurrent IMT in the abdominal cavity, and intestinal obstruction during regular chemotherapy at 20 months after primary surgery; palliative surgery was performed to release the symptom. The patient received common bile duct interventional dredging due to the invasion into the common bile duct at 2 years and 3 years, respectively, after the second operation and common bile duct drainage at 6 years after the second operation. In addition, this child was closely followed up for 132 months despite with poor quality of life.

The other two patients diagnosed with thoracic IMTs exhibited serious local invasiveness to lung, pericardium, aorta, vena cava and other mediastinal structures, and received common chemotherapy after incomplete surgery. Recurrence was both observed at the one-month follow-up after surgery. One of them refused further treatment, because the family could not afford the expenses, and died of secondary airway obstruction at postoperative Month 6. The other refused reoperation, kept on chemotherapy and other adjuvant therapy and died of heart failure secondary to tumor compression at postoperative Month 13. Of all recurrences, only one was confined to a single organ and three extended beyond a single organ. Our results suggest that whether the tumor could be completely removed, the location of the tumor, and the extent of tumor invasion of surrounding tissues might be related to recurrence and death. Chemotherapy seems to achieve little after palliative surgery in patients with serious local invasiveness. No distant metastasis was detected in all cases.

In summary, we reported 19 children with IMT in this study. The tumor locations vary, and the most common site of tumors in our series was the abdomen. Pathological and immunohistochemical tests are the gold standards for IMT diagnosis. CT can help define tumor anatomy and guide surgery. Complete surgical resection is preferred and can limit the recurrence. But whether the tumor is completely removed or not, tumor location and invaded area might be related to recurrence and death. Chemotherapy seems to achieve little after palliative surgery in patients with serious local invasiveness and further studies are needed to detect more promising treatment options.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.

Ethics Statement

This retrospective study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

Author Contributions

XM designed the study and helped write the manuscript. MD performed the experiments, interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. BQ collected and analyzed data. CX analyzed data. HW, BJ, WP, JQ, JS, and KW interpreted and analyzed data.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the entire staff of the Department of General Surgery, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by funding from The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81770509) and Jiangsu Provincial Special Program of Medical Science (BL2013003).

References

  • 1.Surabhi VR, Chua S, Patel RP, Takahashi N, Lalwani N, Prasad SR. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors: current update. Radiol Clin North Am. (2016) 54:553–63. 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gleason BC, Hornick JL. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: where are we now? J Clin Pathol. (2008) 61:428–37. 10.1136/jcp.2007.049387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patnana M, Sevrukov AB, Elsayes KM, Viswanathan C, Lubner M, Menias CO. Inflammatory pseudotumor: the great mimicker. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2012) 198:W217–27. 10.2214/AJR.11.7288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hammas N, Chbani L, Rami M, Boubbou M, Benmiloud S, Bouabdellah Y, et al. A rare tumor of the lung: inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Diagn Pathol. (2012) 7:83. 10.1186/1746-1596-7-83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: comparison of clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK expression in atypical and aggressive cases. Am J Surg Pathol. (2007) 31:509–20. 10.1097/01.pas.0000213393.57322.c7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fu GX, Xu CC, Yao NF, Gu JZ, Jiang HL, Han XF. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a demographic, clinical and therapeutic study of 92 cases. Math Biosci Eng. (2019) 16:6794–804. 10.3934/mbe.2019339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Soyer T, Talim B, Karnak I, Ekinci S, Andiran F, Ciftci AO, et al. Surgical treatment of childhood inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Eur J Pediatr Surg. (2017) 27:319–23. 10.1055/s-0036-1593380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kovach SJ, Fischer AC, Katzman PJ, Salloum RM, Ettinghausen SE, Madeb R, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. J Surg Oncol. (2006) 94:385–91. 10.1002/jso.20516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dalton BG, Thomas PG, Sharp NE, Manalang MA, Fisher JE, Moir CR, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors in children. J Pediatr Surg. (2016) 51:541–4. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Antonescu CR, Suurmeijer AJ, Zhang L, Sung YS, Jungbluth AA, Travis WD, et al. Molecular characterization of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors with frequent ALK and ROS1 gene fusions and rare novel RET rearrangement. Am J Surg Pathol. (2015) 39:957–67. 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Butrynski JE, D'Adamo DR, Hornick JL, Dal Cin P, Antonescu CR, Jhanwar SC, et al. Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. N Engl J Med. (2010) 363:1727–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa1007056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ogata M, Hatachi Y, Ogata T, Satake H, Imai Y, Yasui H. Effectiveness of crizotinib for inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with ALK mutation. Intern Med. (2019) 58:1029–32. 10.2169/internalmedicine.1640-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Theilen TM, Soerensen J, Bochennek K, Becker M, Schwabe D, Rolle U, et al. Crizotinib in ALK(+) inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors-Current experience and future perspectives. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2018) 65. 10.1002/pbc.26920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Buccoliero AM, Ghionzoli M, Castiglione F, Paglierani M, Baroni G, Messineo A, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of a pediatric case. Pathol Res Pract. (2014) 210:1152–5. 10.1016/j.prp.2014.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sagar AES, Jimenez CA, Shannon VR. Clinical and histopathologic correlates and management strategies for inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung. A case series and review of the literature. Med Oncol. (2018) 35:102. 10.1007/s12032-018-1161-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Craig E, Wiltsie LM, Beaupin LK, Baig A, Kozielski R, Rothstein DH, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor therapy in the treatment of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors in pediatric patients: case reports and literature review. J Pediatr Surg. (2021). 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.02.004. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fragoso AC, Eloy C, Estevao-Costa J, Campos M, Farinha N, Lopes JM. Abdominal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor a clinicopathologic study with reappraisal of biologic behavior. J Pediatr Surg. (2011) 46:2076–82. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang N, Zeng Q, Chen C, Yu J, Yan D, Xu C, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: an over 10-year retrospective analysis. Pediatr Investig. (2020) 4:192–7. 10.1002/ped4.12218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Estevao-Costa J, Correia-Pinto J, Rodrigues FC, Carvalho JL, Campos M, Dias JA, et al. Gastric inflammatory myofibroblastic proliferation in children. Pediatr Surg Int. (1998) 13:95–9. 10.1007/s003830050257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. (1995) 19:859–72. 10.1097/00000478-199508000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.


Articles from Frontiers in Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES