Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254891

Geographical variations in maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy associated with birth weight in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China

Yini Liu 1, Huihui Zhang 1, Yaling Zhao 1, Fangyao Chen 1, Baibing Mi 1, Jing Zhou 2, Yulong Chen 3, Duolao Wang 4, Leilei Pei 1,*
Editor: Frank T Spradley5
PMCID: PMC8297908  PMID: 34293043

Abstract

The geographical variation of maternal dietary patterns related to birth outcomes is important for improving the health of mothers and children; however, it is currently unknown. Thus, the objective of the study was to investigate geographical variations of maternal dietary pattern during pregnancy, and evaluate the spatial varying association of maternal dietary patterns in pregnancy with abnormal birth weight. A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Shaanxi province in Northwest China in 2013 to evaluate the relationship between abnormal birth weight and dietary pattern using the Geographically Weighted Logistic Regression (GWLR). Three dietary patterns during pregnancy were extracted through factor analysis, explaining approximately 45.8% of the variability of food intake. Approximately 81.6% of mothers with higher scores on the equilibrium pattern was more unlikely to have small for gestational age (SGA) infants, with the lower OR observed in Central and South Shaanxi. The snacks pattern was positively associated with low birth weight (LBW) for 23.2% of participants, with the highest OR in Central Shaanxi. Among about 80.0% of participants with higher scores on the snacks pattern living in South and Central Shaanxi, there was a higher risk for SGA. The OR values tend to descend from South to North Shaanxi. The OR values of the negative association between prudent pattern and LBW decreased from South to North Shaanxi among approximately 59.3% of participants. The prudent pattern was also negatively associated with the increasing risk of fetal macrosomia among 19.2% of participants living mainly in South Shaanxi. The association of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy with abnormal birth weight varied geographically across Shaanxi province. The findings emphasize the importance of geographical distribution to improve the dietary patterns among disadvantaged pregnant women.

Introduction

Dietary patterns are useful to examine the quality of a person’s overall diet related to health outcomes because it is acknowledged that consumption of individual food or nutrients does not occur in isolation but interacts with each other. Pregnancy is a critical period during which healthy diet characterized by consuming a variety of nutritious foods is essential for promoting and maintaining maternal and child health [14]. Because of socio-cultural and geographical reasons, maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy are different and population-specific in each area [5, 6]. Current studies regarding to the association of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes have not always been consistent across regions [7, 8], which at least in part might have resulted from geographical heterogeneity. Geographical heterogeneity could cause biases for association estimates and their standard errors if they are not properly accounted for. Thus far, however, there was few evidence demonstrating the geographical difference in the relationship between maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and birth outcomes of infants. Therefore, it is necessary to find an efficient way to uncover such geographically varying characteristics of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy that are associated with birth outcomes, which would facilitate the identification of links between diet and adverse birth outcomes.

Shaanxi located in Northwest China, is one of the provinces with huge variations in geographical environment and dietary structure in different areas. Thus, geographical heterogeneity cannot be ignored when we study the spatial variation of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy in relation to birth outcomes. Abnormal birth weight (e.g. low BW or high BW) representing an important adverse birth outcome is strongly correlated with various health outcomes including neonatal mortality and morbidity as well as developing chronic diseases throughout their life [912]. In previous studies, conventional global regression models were commonly used to explore the association of maternal dietary pattern during pregnancy with abnormal birth weight. The traditional global regression which ignores the impacts of local variations produces average parameters to reflect the geographical relationships equally over the whole study area. Due to the lack of consideration in geographical heterogeneity, evaluation by conventional global regression is inadequate. To address this issue, geographically weighted regression (GWR) model could be applied to explore how one dependent variable changes in response to one or more independent variables at the local scale. Through taking the samples within a defined neighborhood into calculation by giving more weights to nearby samples than those further away, GWR generates local coefficients to elucidate the relationships within the neighborhood. Using maps to show the geographical variation in the relative importance of each covariate, GWR provides a visually powerful way of conveying the observations to the public health practitioners.

In Shaanxi province of Northwest China, to the best of knowledge, how to evaluate the geographical variation of maternal dietary patterns that are related to birth outcomes are not known but are important for improving the health of mothers and children. Thus, to address the aforementioned research questions, the objectives of this study were twofold: (1) to investigate geographical variations of maternal dietary pattern during pregnancy; (2) use GWR to evaluate the geographically varying association of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy with abnormal birth weight.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

From August to November 2013, a large-scale cross-sectional survey was conducted in Shaanxi province, in Northwest China with the purpose to assess the birth outcomes. The subjects of the study were those live births born from January 2010 to November 2013 and their mothers. Participants were obtained by means of multi-stage random sampling method, that is, district random sampling was carried out after urban and rural areas were stratified to control for the impact of uneven distribution of dietary patterns on the risk of birth outcomes in different regions. In China, the administrative structure is composed of three layers, county, township and village in rural areas and district, street and community in urban areas, respectively. Based on the proportion of urban and rural areas, and considering the population density and fertility level, 20 counties in rural areas and 10 districts in urban areas were randomly selected by proportionate probability size (PPS) method. From each selected counties, 6 villages each from 6 townships were randomly selected. In urban areas, however, from each selected districts, 6 communities from each of 3 selected streets were sampled randomly. Finally, 10 babies born during 2010–2013 and their mothers in each chosen villages and 20 in each community were selected by a completely random sampling method. A total of 7,934 eligible women who completely fulfilled the diet survey were included into the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved and reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center (approval code: 2012008) [13].

Data collection

A structured questionnaire was used to obtain all information through face-to-face interview of mothers of the neonates. Firstly, socio-demographic characteristics were obtained by a standard family questionnaire. Secondly, dietary intakes of mothers during the entire pregnancy was assessed by a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). It has been demonstrated that FFQ in the survey has satisfied reliability and validity for pregnant women in rural western China [14, 15]. In the FFQ, there are 102 food items, including fourteen food groups (cereals, potatoes, legumes, vegetables, fungi, fruits, nuts, meats, dairy, eggs, fish, ethnic snacks, fast foods, and beverages) based on the China Food Composition Table [16]. The frequency of 102 food items was divided into eight categories ranging from "never" to "≥ 2 times/day". With the assistance of food portion images, the portion sizes for the 102 food items were recorded [14, 15]. The information of neonates including birth weight, birth date, and so on, was obtained from medical records.

Quality control

Field surveys and data collection were performed by the trained field staff from Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center. To control the quality of the data, all questionnaires and procedures were pre-tested in field prior to the formal survey, and then detailed interview guidelines were formulated. A total of 10 teams from Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center performed the surveys in the selected counties or districts. Each team was composed of 10–12 qualified investigators, a supervisor from, and a pediatrician from the local maternal and child health hospital. During the field survey, the supervisors monitored all field work and reviewed the questionnaire. When errors or missing items were identified, participants were re-interviewed immediately. With sustained support from local hospitals, health administration departments and the Provincial Ministry of Health, we collected all information within the local village clinics and community health service centers [13].

Study variables

Abnormal birth weight including low birth weight (LBW, birth weight < 2500 g), macrosomia (birth weight > 4000 g), small for gestational age (SGA, birth weight was below the 10th percentile of the average gestational age) and large for gestational age (LGA, birth weight was above the 90th percentile of the average gestational age) was considered as final outcome variables in the multivariate analysis [17, 18]. As the independent variable, dietary pattern had two dummy variables: T1 (1 = yes, 0 = no) and T3 (1 = yes, 0 = no), with T2 as a reference group. The socio-demographic variables include child gender (male, female), fetal number (singleton, twin and multi-fetal), infant parity (1, 2, or ≥ 3), childbearing age (18–24, 25–29, ≥ 30 years), mother’s education (primary school and below, junior high school, senior high school, college and above), mother’s residence during pregnancy (floating, permanent), Household wealth Index (poor, middle-income, rich), altitude of residence (< 500, 500–1000, ≥ 1000), and area (South Shaanxi, Central Shaanxi, North Shaanxi).

Statistical analysis

Epidata 3.1 software with double entry was used to establish the database. Maternal dietary patterns (equilibrium, snack, and prudent) were derived by principal component analysis (PCA) and varimax rotation method using SPSS software. Before deriving the dietary patterns, the reliability of PCA was verified by Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value and Bartlett’s test of sphericity. The number of dietary patterns was calculated by eigenvalues (>1.2), variance contribution rate (>5%), the scree plot and the interpretability of the factors [19, 20]. Food groups with absolute factor loadings >0.3 were considered to be highly correlated to the identified factors. Factor scores were calculated for each mother to indicate if mother’s diet was consistent with the respective dietary patterns.

The vector map of China available at the National Platform for Common Geospatial Information Services (http://www.tianditu.com/) was used to obtain the geographic information (including geographic coordinates and altitude) for each township/street in Shaanxi province. The basic geographic unit in the study was townships and streets. Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude/longitude) of the townships and streets was used to define their geographic location.

The GWLR model was employed to determine the relationship between abnormal birth weight and individual factors using the formula below [21]:

logPyi=11-Pyi=1=β0iui,vi+j=1kβijui,vixij

The equation hypothesizes that yi (dependent variables) was any abnormal birth weight for each individual i, xij represented a set of independent variables(j = 1, …, k) for the individual i, (ui, vi) was regarded as the x-y coordinates of the individual i; βij (regression coefficient) was deemed as the estimated effect of independent variable j for the individual i. The GWLR model is an extension and deformation of the typical linear regression model. The geographical data was incorporated into the model to create conditions for analyzing the geographical characteristics of the regression relationship.

We selected the GWR 4.0 software in this study (https://geodacenter.asu.edu/software/downloads/gwr_downloads) and the iterative reweighted least squares method was used to establish the GWLR model. During the process of modeling, a distance-based weighting scheme was used to assign weights to each township/street and the GWLR equation was estimated for each township/street. The kernel type and function for geographic weighting was used to estimate local coefficients for each township/street and bandwidth size was adaptive bisquare. Corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) was used as the golden section search method to select the bandwidth of the adaptive kernel. The variability of each coefficient in geographic location was tested by comparing the difference [22]. In the GWLR model, OR corresponding to the unit change in the variables was obtained by exponentiation of the explanatory variable coefficients [22]. The variability of the influence of abnormal birth weight on individuals in different regions was evaluated by comparing the variability of each coefficient in each geographic location [23].

The analysis was completed by the following steps. Firstly, the effects of each dietary pattern on abnormal birth weight were determined by non-spatial logistic regression analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0. For bilateral test, the test level was set at the level of α = 0.05. Subsequently, all explanatory variables were entered into the GWLR model as described above. The variables with the largest p-value were gradually eliminated from the model until only those with local p-value <0.1 were obtained. Finally, ArcGIS 10.0 software (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA, US) was used to show the local average estimates (OR) and p-values of individuals on the Shaanxi map. These values were used to intuitively reflect the geographical differences in the relationship between abnormal birth weight outcome and individual factors.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the participants

In this study, a total of 173 towns/streets were chosen within 30 counties in Shaanxi province, and 7,934 live infants were included in the final analysis. Among the mothers included in the study, the average age was 26.88±4.62 years and the average parity was 1.44 ± 0.56. The proportions of study participants from northern, central and southern Shaanxi were 18.1, 51.1 and 30.7%, respectively. From south to north, Shaanxi is divided into three physiographic regions by the North Mountains and the Qin Mountains. These three parts are North Shaanxi, Central Shaanxi, and South Shaanxi. North Shaanxi is a plateau, central Shaanxi is a plain and south Shaanxi is a mountainous region with an elevation of about 1500–3000 meters. Of the infants, the average age was 8.92 ±6.30 months (range 0–45 months), 53.6% were male and 98.8% were singletons.

Characteristics of dietary pattern distribution during pregnancy among mothers

Through principal component analysis (PCA), three dietary patterns during pregnancy were extracted in Shaanxi province, northwest China, which explained approximately 45.8% of the variability in food intake (28.4%, 9.5% and 7.9% for three dietary patterns, respectively). According to the high positive loadings from various foods, including vegetables, homonemeae, beans meats, meat or flesh, fruit, fish and shrimp, potato, nuts, dairy, fast-food, sweetmeat, cereal, eggs and beverages, this first pattern was labelled as the ‘equilibrium pattern’. The highest and lowest scores of the equilibrium pattern were in the Central Shaanxi and Northern Shaanxi, respectively. (Fig 1). The second pattern labelled as ‘snacks pattern’ had high loading from beverages, sweetmeat, fast-food, dairy and eggs. The scores of the snacks pattern were the higher in North Shaanxi, followed by South Shaanxi and Central Shaanxi (Fig 2). The third pattern with high intakes of dairy products and eggs was labelled as the ‘prudent pattern’ (Table 1). The scores of the prudent pattern had decreasing trend of from south to north. (Fig 3).

Fig 1. The score of equilibrium pattern among pregnant women by different areas in Shaanxi province, 2013.

Fig 1

Fig 2. The score of snacks pattern among pregnant women by different areas in Shaanxi province, 2013.

Fig 2

Table 1. Factor loadings for the identified dietary patterns among pregnant women (n 7934) in Shaanxi province, Northwest China, 2013.

Dietary pattern Food group Factor loading* Cumulative variance explained (%)
Equilibrium pattern vegetable 0.762 28.4
homonemeae 0.695
beans 0.624
meat or flesh 0.602
fruit 0.590
fish and shrimp 0.537
potato 0.535
nuts 0.504
dairy 0.469
fast-food 0.469
sweetmeat 0.443
cereal 0.357
eggs 0.338
beverages 0.315
Snacks pattern beverages 0.641 37.9
sweetmeat 0.574
fast-food 0.348
dairy -0.333
eggs -0.437
Prudent pattern eggs 0.408 45.8
dairy 0.331
vegetable -0.342
potato -0.534

*Food groups are listed by the size of factor loadings, with negative loadings at the end. Food groups with absolute factor loadings <0.300 are not shown.

Fig 3. The score of prudent pattern among pregnant women by different areas in Shaanxi province, 2013.

Fig 3

Table 2 showed the sociodemographic characteristics and median daily intakes of energy and nutrients according to tertiles of dietary patterns scores among pregnant women in Shaanxi province. In terms of equilibrium pattern, pregnant women with high scores were more likely to live in south or central Shaanxi, areas with lower altitudes (<500 meters) and be better educated and wealthier. Besides, mothers with high scores on equilibrium pattern tend to have higher childbearing age and lower parity. The sociodemographic characteristics of the mothers with prudent pattern was similar to those with equilibrium pattern, except for maternal childbearing age which did not differ between tertiles of prudent pattern scores. On the contrary, mothers with high scores on the snacks pattern were more likely to live in north Shaanxi, areas with higher altitudes (>1000 meters), be less educated and poor, and be aged 18–24 years at delivery. Women with higher scores on the equilibrium pattern had higher intakes of energy and all selected nutrients, while those with lower scores on the prudent pattern and the snacks pattern had higher energy intake, carbohydrate intake and higher intakes of other selected nutrients.

Table 2. The characteristics of dietary patterns among pregnant women (n 7934) in Shaanxi province, Northwest China, 2013.

Equilibrium pattern Snacks pattern Prudent pattern
T1 T2 T3 P* T1 T2 T3 P* T1 T2 T3 P*
Sociodemographic characteristics
Child gender (%) 0.490 0.953 0.244
 Male 1393 (32.7) 1425 (33.5) 1438 (33.8) 1423 (33.4) 1418 (33.3) 1415 (33.2) 1445 (34.0) 1386 (32.6) 1425 (33.5)
 Female 1248 (34.0) 1216 (33.1) 1210 (32.9) 1218 (33.2) 1224 (33.3) 1232 (33.5) 1194 (32.5) 1256 (34.2) 1224 (33.3)
Fetal number (%) 0.051 0.746 0.809
 Singleton 2614 (33.4) 2598 (33.2) 2625 (33.5) 2610 (33.3) 2607 (33.3) 2620 (33.4) 2611 (33.3) 2611 (33.3) 2615 (33.4)
 Twin and multi-fetal 28 (29.2) 43 (44.8) 25 (26.0) 32 (33.3) 35 (36.5) 29 (30.2) 30 (31.3) 31 (32.3) 35 (36.5)
Infant parity (%) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 1 1436 (30.8) 1524 (32.7) 1705 (36.5) 1710 (36.7) 1456 (31.2) 1499 (32.1) 1388 (29.8) 1524 (32.7) 1753 (37.6)
 2 1100 (37.1) 1010 (34.1) 856 (28.9) 851 (28.7) 1074 (36.2) 1041 (35.1) 1115 (37.6) 1030 (34.7) 821 (27.7)
 ≥3 96 (37.1) 94 (36.3) 69 (26.6) 72 (27.8) 98 (37.8) 89 (34.4) 128 (49.4) 70 (27.0) 61 (23.6)
Childbearing age (%) <0.001 <0.001 0.201
 18–24 988 (36.3) 885 (32.5) 848 (31.2) 776 (28.5) 860 (31.6) 1085 (39.9) 917 (33.7) 924 (34.0) 880 (32.3)
 25–29 987 (30.4) 1127 (34.7) 1138 (35.0) 1176 (36.2) 1090 (33.5) 986 (30.3) 1051 (32.3) 1100 (33.8) 1101 (33.9)
 ≥30 649 (34.3) 605 (32.0) 639 (33.8) 668 (35.3) 670 (35.4) 555 (29.3) 656 (34.7) 595 (31.4) 642 (33.9)
Mother’s education (%) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Primary school and below 306 (42.1) 257 (35.4) 163 (22.5) 154 (21.2) 273 (37.6) 299 (41.2) 317 (43.7) 250 (34.4) 159 (21.9)
 Junior high school 1589 (37.3) 1422 (33.4) 1251 (29.4) 1212 (28.4) 1491 (35.0) 1559 (36.6) 1525 (35.8) 1466 (34.4) 1271 (29.8)
 Senior high school 515 (29.5) 570 (32.6) 661 (37.9) 654 (37.5) 564 (32.3) 528 (30.2) 503 (28.8) 586 (33.6) 657 (37.6)
 College and above 225 (19.0) 391 (33.1) 566 (47.9) 614 (51.9) 310 (26.2) 258 (21.8) 293 (24.8) 335 (28.3) 554 (46.9)
Mother’s residence during pregnancy (%) 0.141 0.001 <0.001
 Floating 311 (30.7) 340 (33.6) 361 (35.7) 385 (38.0) 331 (32.7) 296 (29.2) 270 (26.7) 328 (32.4) 414 (40.9)
 Permanent 2309 (33.6) 2285 (33.3) 2277 (33.1) 2246 (32.7) 2292 (33.4) 2333 (34.0) 2356 (34.3) 2289 (33.3) 2226 (32.4)
Household wealth Index (%) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Poor 948 (36.9) 923 (35.9) 698 (27.2) 758 (29.5) 911 (35.5) 900 (35.0) 969 (37.7) 885 (34.4) 715 (27.8)
 Middle-income 847 (32.2) 871 (33.1) 912 (34.7) 912 (34.7) 876 (33.3) 842 (32.0) 881 (33.5) 862 (32.8) 887 (33.7)
 Rich 847 (31.0) 848 (31.0) 1040 (38.0) 972 (35.5) 855 (31.3) 908 (33.2) 792 (29.0) 895 (32.7) 1048 (38.3)
Altitude (%) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 <500 667 (28.3) 751 (31.9) 937 (39.8) 1003 (42.6) 715 (30.4) 637 (27.0) 539 (22.9) 764 (32.4) 1052 (44.7)
 500–1000 1265 (34.8) 1161 (32.0) 1207 (33.2) 1146 (31.5) 1248 (34.4) 1239 (34.1) 1125 (31.0) 1226 (33.7) 1282 (35.3)
 >1000 710 (36.5) 730 (37.5) 506 (26.0) 493 (25.3) 679 (34.9) 774 (39.8) 978 (50.3) 652 (33.5) 316 (16.2)
Area (%) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 South area 863 (35.4) 716 (29.4) 860 (35.3) 732 (30.0) 783 (32.1) 924 (37.9) 622 (25.5) 801 (32.8) 1016 (41.7)
 Central area 1288 (31.8) 1346 (33.2) 1422 (35.1) 1623 (40.0) 1383 (34.1) 1050 (25.9) 1194 (29.4) 1430 (35.3) 1432 (35.3)
 North area 491 (34.1) 580 (40.3) 368 (25.6) 287 (19.9) 476 (33.1) 676 (47.0) 826 (57.4) 411 (28.6) 202 (14.0)
Median daily intake
Energy(KJ) 4417 6681 10120 <0.001 8329 5933 6011 <0.001 7375 5930 6925 <0.001
Protein(g) 39 61 97 <0.001 82 53 49 <0.001 65 53 66 <0.001
Fat(g) 20 38 69 <0.001 54 31 30 <0.001 35 32 48 <0.001
Carbohydrate(g) 195 276 388 <0.001 320 254 260 <0.001 325 251 255 <0.001
Vitamin A(μg RE) 169 392 794 <0.001 500 325 387 <0.001 523 306 380 <0.001
Thiamin(mg) 0.4 0.6 1 <0.001 0.8 0.6 0.6 <0.001 0.8 0.6 0.6 <0.001
Riboflavin(mg) 0.3 0.7 1.2 <0.001 0.9 0.5 0.5 <0.001 0.7 0.5 0.8 <0.001
Folate(μg) 141 273 510 <0.001 369 230 238 <0.001 315 225 293 <0.001
Niacin(mg) 7 11 18 <0.001 14 10 10 <0.001 13 10 11 <0.001
Vitamin C(mg) 42 89 166 <0.001 97 73 98 <0.001 120 73 77 <0.001
Vitamin E(mg) 6.9 16.6 31 <0.001 22 14 14 <0.001 19 14 17 <0.001
Ca(mg) 235 462 795 <0.001 666 392 362 <0.001 470 392 545 <0.001
Fe(mg) 8.3 14.6 25.8 <0.001 20 13 13 <0.001 17 13 16 <0.001
Zn(mg) 2.8 5.3 9.6 <0.001 7.3 4.4 4.6 <0.001 5.8 4.5 6.1 <0.001
Se(μg) 17 28 49 <0.001 40 24 22 <0.001 27 24 34 <0.001

T, tertiles; RE, retinol equivalent.

* P values for the differences among the groups of dietary pattern scores were derived from the χ2 test for categorical variables and the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables.

Values are presented as percentages for these categorical variables.

Characteristics of abnormal birth weight

Among the live infants, the prevalence of abnormal birth weight was 3.7% for LBW, 6.2% for macrosomia, 10.9% for SGA, 10.0% for LGA, respectively. The prevalence of LBW and LGA were the highest in South Shaanxi (4.1% for LBW and 10.3% for SGA, respectively), followed by Central Shaanxi (3.7% and 10.2%) and North Shaanxi (3.3% and 10.1%) (S1 and S2 Figs). The incidence of macrosomia was 6.6% in North Shaanxi, 6.2% in Central Shaanxi and 6.1% in Southern Shaanxi respectively (S3 Fig). SGA incidence in Central Shaanxi (11.7%) was higher than that in South Shaanxi (10.9%) or Northern Shaanxi (10.0%). (S4 Fig). The prevalence of abnormal birth weight differed across the baseline characteristics, and are presented in Table 3. The incidence of LBW was significantly lower in T3 group of equilibrium pattern, T1 group of snacks pattern, and T1 or T3 group of prudent pattern, respectively (P<0.05). Likewise, there were lower prevalence of SGA in T3 group of equilibrium pattern and T1 group of snacks pattern (P<0.05).

Table 3. Baseline characteristics of study population (n 7934) in Shaanxi province, Northwest China, 2013*.

Study variable LBW Macrosomia SGA LGA
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Child gender
 Male 139(3.3) 316(7.5) 461(11.0) 436(10.4)
 Female 157(4.3) 174(4.8) 407(11.3) 358(9.9)
Fetal number
 Singleton 251(3.2) 488(6.3) 827(10.7) 786(10.2)
 Twin and multi-fetal 45(46.9) 2(2.1) 41(43.2) 8(8.4)
Infant parity
 1 148(3.2) 251(5.4) 500(11.0) 414(9.1)
 2 120(4.1) 220(7.5) 318(10.9) 350(11.9)
 ≥3 26(10.3) 18(7.1) 42(16.7) 28(11.1)
Childbearing age
 18–24 95(3.5) 134(5.0) 336(12.6) 216(8.1)
 25–29 126(3.9) 200(6.2) 328(10.3) 324(10.1)
 ≥30 74(3.9) 152(8.1) 200(10.8) 243(13.1)
Mother’s education
 Primary school and below 27(3.8) 46(6.4) 92(13.0) 67(9.4)
 Junior high school 173(4.1) 242(5.7) 503(12.0) 416(9.9)
 Senior high school 71(4.1) 110(6.3) 185(10.8) 165(9.6)
 College and above 25(2.1) 91(7.7) 87(7.5) 142(12.3)
Mother’s residence during pregnancy
 Floating 43(3.7) 64(6.2) 106(11.2) 111(10.1)
 Permanent 252(4.3) 423(6.4) 755(10.7) 678(11.2)
Household wealth Index
 Poor 104(4.1) 133(5.2) 329(13.0) 221(8.8)
 Middle-income 89(3.4) 167(6.4) 274(10.6) 264(10.2)
 Rich 103(3.8) 190(7.0) 265(9.9) 309(11.5)
Altitude
 <500 74(3.2) 164(7.0) 198(8.6) 250(10.8)
 500–1000 142(3.9) 221(6.1) 396(11.1) 372(10.5)
 >1000 80(4.1) 105(5.4) 274(14.3) 172(9.0)
Area
 South area 100(4.1) 148(6.1) 258(10.9) 244(10.3)
 Central area 148(3.7) 248(6.2) 467(11.7) 406(10.2)
 North area 48(3.3) 94(6.6) 143(10.0) 144(10.1)
Equilibrium pattern
 T1 116(4.4) 163(6.2) 310(12.0) 247(9.5)
 T2 102(3.9) 148(5.6) 312(12.0) 262(10.1)
 T3 78(3.0) 179(6.8) 246(9.5) 285(11.0)
Snacks pattern
 T1 76(2.9) 171(6.5) 254(9.8) 289(11.1)
 T2 105(4.0) 143(5.4) 284(10.9) 241(9.3)
 T3 115(4.4) 176(6.7) 330(12.7) 264(10.2)
Prudent pattern
 T1 87(3.3) 157(6.0) 296(11.4) 247(9.5)
 T2 121(4.6) 176(6.7) 299(11.5) 277(10.7)
 T3 88(3.3) 157(6.0) 273(10.5) 270(10.4)

T, tertiles; LBW, low birth weight; SGA, small for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age.

* Values are the number of abnormal birth outcomes and the prevalence is included in the bracket.

Significant differences among the groups were derived from the χ2 test for categorical variables (P<0.05).

Association between dietary patterns and abnormal birth weight using non-spatial logistic regression

Non-spatial logistic regression results showed that SGA was less likely to occur among the infants born by mothers in the T3 group of equilibrium pattern in comparison with those whose mothers were from T2 group (OR: 0.801, 95%CI: 0.665–0.965) (Table 4). Mothers with higher scores of snacks pattern were associated with increasing risk of macrosomia and SGA among the infants (OR: 1.265, 95%CI: 1.000–1.602; OR: 1.260, 95%CI: 1.056–1.505, respectively). Compared with those in the T2 group of prudent pattern, mothers in the T1 group of the prudent pattern had higher risk of LBW in their offspring (OR: 0.732, 95%CI: 0.537–0.997), and mothers in the T3 group had lower risk of fetal macrosomia (OR: 0.788, 95%CI: 0.623–0.997).

Table 4. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression*.

Equilibrium pattern Snacks pattern Prudent pattern
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
LBW
Crude ORa 1.032 1 0.797 0.786 1 1.154 0.726 1 0.793
(0.780–1.366) (0.587–1.081) (0.569–1.085) (0.878–1.516) (0.544–0.969) (0.595–1.058)
Adjusted ORb 1.075 1 0.844 0.783 1 1.226 0.732 1 0.788
(0.800–1.444) (0.612–1.164) (0.557–1.100) (0.919–1.635) (0.537–0.997) (0.581–1.069)
Macrosomia
Crude ORa 1.108 1 1.205 1.207 1 1.237 0.874 1 0.846
(0.875–1.403) (0.959–1.515) (0.942–1.546) (0.983–1.557) (0.695–1.098) (0.673–1.063)
Adjusted ORb 1.137 1 1.169 1.183 1 1.265 0.853 1 0.788
(0.894–1.446) (0.925–1.479) (0.920–1.523) (1.000–1.602) (0.674–1.080) (0.623–0.997)
SGA
Crude ORa 0.969 1 0.769 0.962 1 1.236 1.006 1 0.956
(0.816–1.152) (0.642–0.920) (0.793–1.166) (1.042–1.465) (0.844–1.199) (0.799–1.143)
Adjusted ORb 0.968 1 0.801 0.996 1 1.26 0.997 1 0.996
(0.811–1.157) (0.665–0.965) (0.817–1.215) (1.056–1.505) (0.829–1.198) (0.828–1.199)
LGA
Crude ORa 0.946 1 1.087 1.172 1 1.097 0.856 1 0.92
(0.783–1.142) (0.907–1.302) (0.964–1.425) (0.911–1.321) (0.711–1.030) (0.766–1.103)
Adjusted ORb 0.948 1 1.069 1.124 1 1.102 0.836 1 0.88
(0.782–1.149) (0.888–1.287) (0.921–1.373) (0.911–1.334) (0.690–1.013) (0.730–1.062)

T, tertiles; LBW, low birth weight; SGA, small for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age.

* Values are OR of abnormal birth outcomes and its 95% confidence interval is included in the bracket.

a OR are not adjusted for any variables.

b OR are adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics (child gender, fetal number, infant parity, childbearing age, mother’s education, mother’s residence during pregnancy, Household wealth Index, altitude of residence and area).

Association between dietary patterns and abnormal birth weight using spatial logistic regression

Based on geographically weighted regression (GWR) for LBW, macrosomia, SGA and LGA in the present study, the optimal bandwidth size were 7332.000, 6631.000, 7596.000, and 7573.000 (persons) respectively. Comparing the global regression and GWR, we concluded that the local regression has better fitness. Approximately 81.6% of mothers with higher scores on the equilibrium pattern was more unlikely to have SGA infants (P < 0.05), with the highest OR observed in North Shaanxi and the lowest OR observed in South Shaanxi. (Table 5 and S5 Fig). The higher scores of mothers with snacks pattern during pregnancy were found to be positively associated with LBW for 23.2% of participants (P< 0.05), with decreasing OR values from central Shaanxi to the north and south Shaanxi (Table 5 and S6 Fig). Similarly, infants born by women in the T3 group of snacks pattern was significantly correlated with macrosomia for 19.5% of participants (P< 0.05), with decreasing OR values from south to north (Table 5 and S7 Fig). Among about 80.0% of participants who lived in South and Central Shaanxi, there was a higher risk for SGA in the T3 group of snacks pattern than that in the T2 group (P < 0.05). The OR values tend to descend from South to North Shaanxi (Table 5 and S8 Fig). With T2 group of prudent pattern as the reference, a lower risk for LBW among the infants were observed among approximately 75.0% of participants in T1 group and 59.3% of those in T3 group, respectively (P< 0.05). For the OR values of LBW, there was a tendency to decrease from South to North Shaanxi (Table 5, S9 and S10 Figs). The mothers with higher scores of prudent pattern was also negatively associated with the increasing risk of fetal macrosomia among 19.2% of participants (P<0.05), with adjusted OR values ranging from 0.875 (South Shaanxi) to 0.939 (Central Shaanxi) (Table 5 and S11 Fig).

Table 5. The association of dietary pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using the GWR model*.

Equilibrium pattern Snacks pattern Prudent pattern
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
LBW
Crude ORa 0.993(0.895–1.125) 1 0.889(0.742–0.998) 0.886(0.778–0.946) 1 1.126(1.037–1.249) 0.825(0.797–0.919) 1 0.807(0.776–0.967)
Adjusted ORb 1.037(0.975–1.135) 1 0.942(0.796–1.007) 0.876(0.819–0.953) 1 1.145(1.066–1.247) 0.814(0.766–0.892) 1 0.835(0.779–0.951)
Percentage 0 0 6.2 23.2 75.0 59.3
Macrosomia
Crude ORa 1.040(1.029–1.065) 1 1.104(1.073–1.143) 1.080(1.019–1.132) 1 1.099(1.009–1.162) 0.934(0.904–0.950) 1 0.940(0.921–0.965)
Adjusted ORb 1.045(0.985–1.089) 1 1.099(1.037–1.149) 1.017(0.969–1.161) 1 1.076(1.027–1.212) 0.929(0.889–0.957) 1 0.912(0.875–0.939)
Percentage 0 0 6.6 19.5 0 19.2
SGA
Crude ORa 0.997(0.827–1.103) 1 0.836(0.740–1.073) 0.983(0.878–1.099) 1 1.150(0.936–1.235) 1.045(0.962–1.088) 1 0.960(0.875–1.192)
Adjusted ORb 0.989(0.972–1.053) 1 0.890(0.883–0.985) 1.007(0.996–1.015) 1 1.104(1.048–1.112) 0.978(0.970–0.985) 1 0.995(0.984–1.004)
Percentage 0 81.6 0 80.0 0 0
LGA
Crude ORa 0.988(0.927–0.998) 1 1.064(1.035–1.102) 1.092(0.981–1.120) 1 1.052(0.973–1.078) 0.924(0.908–0.962) 1 0.958(0.954–0.987)
Adjusted ORb 0.985(0.932–0.999) 1 1.053(1.015–1.097) 1.070(0.962–1.097) 1 1.057(0.988–1.079) 0.927(0.914–0.933) 1 0.934(0.931–0.959)
Percentage 0 0 0 0 0 0

T, tertiles; LBW, low birth weight; SGA, small for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age.

* Values are middle OR of abnormal birth outcomes and its maximum and minimum are included in the bracket.

a OR are not adjusted for any variables.

b OR are adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics (child gender, fetal number, infant parity, childbearing age, mother’s education, mother’s residence during pregnancy, Household wealth Index and altitude of residence).

Percentage of the sample that was statistically significant after adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics.

Discussion

In the present study, three dietary patterns (equilibrium pattern, prudent pattern and snacks pattern) were identified among the mothers during pregnancy in Shaanxi province of northwestern China. We used spatial regression models to explore the geographic variation of maternal dietary patterns in relation to the risk of abnormal birth weight after controlling for other baseline characteristics.

Previous studies suggested that the single nutrient analysis in nutritional epidemiology failed to account for interactions between food components or foods. Dietary patterns represent a broader picture of food and nutrient intakes and are able to account for cumulative and interactive effects [5]. The results suggested that pregnant women with high adherence to the equilibrium pattern tended to eat a diet with a balance of all of the food groups and foods that are rich in energy and various nutrients. Moreover, participants with high adherence to the equilibrium pattern were more likely to be better educated, wealthier, 25–29 years old at delivery, and living at lower altitudes. The characteristics of this dietary model identified in our study was homologous to the dietary patterns in Guangzhou, China [24]. The prudent pattern was characterized by high intakes of dairy products and eggs, and the snacks pattern had high loading of beverages, sweetmeat, and fast-food. Those with higher scores on the prudent pattern and the snacks pattern had lower energy and carbohydrate intake and lower intakes of some selected nutrients. The sociodemographic distribution of mothers with prudent pattern was similar to those with equilibrium pattern, while those with high scores on the snacks pattern were more likely to live in areas with higher altitude (>1000 meters), be poor and less educated, and be aged 18–24 years at delivery. Some studies reported that higher education level and better economic status might enable individuals to make healthy diet choices [25, 26]. Hence, people with higher education level and better economic status tend to be more inclined to adopt the equilibrium pattern [2730]. Conversely, low socioeconomic groups with relatively low level of nutrition knowledge may make unhealthy diet choices and lead to a poor-quality snacks pattern [31].

Due to the huge difference in geographical environment and socio-culture across various areas in China, it was well recognized that the dietary habits and food consumption have different geographical distribution [32, 33]. Similarly, dietary habits also varied largely among different areas in Shaanxi [34]. In our studies, the highest scores of the equilibrium pattern were observed in Central Shaanxi, while the lowest score of the equilibrium pattern was observed in North Shaanxi. The scores of the snacks pattern were higher in North Shaanxi, followed by South Shaanxi and Central Shaanxi. It appeared a decreasing trend of the scores of the prudent pattern from south to north. It is possible that the different geographical environment (e.g. the area altitudes) resulted in different geographical distribution of dietary patterns.

Healthy diet characterized by consuming a variety of nutritious foods during pregnancy is essential for promoting and maintaining fetal health [7, 28]. Global regression analysis revealed that mothers with high adherence to the equilibrium pattern during pregnancy were more unlikely to give birth to a baby with SGA. The findings suggested that equilibrium pattern with a balance of all of the food groups and foods may be beneficial to reduce the risk of SGA, which provided more evidence that healthy diets promote birth weight. Further, the GWLR model showed that equilibrium pattern might reduce more neonates with SGA in Central and South Shaanxi than those in North Shaanxi. Our survey data indicated that the scores of equilibrium pattern was higher in Central and South Shaanxi than those in North Shaanxi. Most parts of Central Shaanxi are developed urban areas (e.g., Xi ’an) where mothers have higher household economic levels and higher education. In contrast, the surveyed area in North Shaanxi comprises of small townships and villages where mothers have lower economic levels and are less educated. Pregnant women in villages with greater density are more likely to eat high-starch foods and tend to adopt more frugal dietary structure [35]. These results remind us that it is extremely urgent to advocate the equilibrium diet during pregnancy, especially in North Shaanxi. Additional studies will be required to corroborate these findings and to elucidate possible reasons for this geographical variations.

There is a high intake of snack food among the Chinese in recent years [36]. The snacks foods as an unhealthy food choice is unable to fulfill the increased key micronutrients requirements for normal fetal growth and may lead to a higher risk of some diseases [37]. According to the global regression, the higher scores of snacks pattern was associated with the increasing risk of macrosomia and SGA among the infants. The snacks pattern consists of foods with high concentrations of simple carbohydrates, lipids and low amounts of protein and micronutrients. Insufficient protein intake during pregnancy affects fetal organ development, leading to a variety of adverse pregnancy outcomes [38]. During pregnancy, fetal growth and development are very rapid, and inadequate nutrition intake can lead to fetal growth retardation and low birth weight [39]. However, some studies also found that this combination of substances in the snacks pattern may lead to rapid fetal weight gain and increase the incidence of macrosomia [40]. Therefore, the snacks pattern contains unbalanced nutrients, favoring abnormal birth weight [41, 42].

GWLR model further revealed that snacks pattern during pregnancy may increase the risk of LBW, Macrosomia and SGA in 23.2%, 19.5% and 80.0%, respectively of all participants. When we focus on the map drawn by OR values, it is clear that the highest OR values of LBW were in Central Shaanxi, and OR values of Macrosomia and SGA progressively decreased from South to North Shaanxi. Thus, it is essential to improve the maternal diet status during pregnancy according to regional characteristics.

The spatial regression model revealed a negative association between high propensity of prudent pattern and the risk of LBW in 59.3% of mothers residing in Central Shaanxi and parts of North Shaanxi. On the map used to visualize these results, prudent pattern might decrease more neonates with LBW in North Shaanxi, followed by Central Shaanxi. The negative association of prudent pattern with macrosomia were mainly present in South Shaanxi. Because the prudent pattern has high contents of dairy products and eggs, which included higher protein and micronutrients compared to snacks pattern, it might benefit maintaining appropriate birth weight. However, the geographical variations after controlling for the important risk factors provide potential policy implications, calling for further investigations.

However, we have to acknowledge some limitations that need to be addressed in the study. First, due to the nature of cross-sectional design, we cannot draw any cause-effect conclusion based on the study results. Secondly, it was difficult to isolate the variation trends in relevant factors based on limited number of areas sampled in our study. Thirdly, we adopted the mothers’ self-reported information on dietary intake during pregnancy. Thus, the possibility of information bias should be considered. Different degree of the reminder bias based on different birth dates is also one of the limitations of our survey even though we adopted systematic approaches to maximize power and minimize bias. Fourthly, the study may be subject to some potential confounders. For example, maternal nutrition status of pregnant (BMI), drug use, genetics, and environmental factors were not available and thus could not be controlled in multivariate analysis. Despite these limitations, this study has still provided important information on the geographic varying association of dietary patterns with abnormal birth weight in northwestern China.

Conclusions

In summary, three dietary patterns (equilibrium pattern, prudent pattern and snacks pattern) were extracted among the mothers during pregnancy, which had different geographical distribution in Shaanxi province of northwestern China. The equilibrium pattern, which is rich in energy and various nutrients, was negatively associated with SGA. The prudent pattern were more likely to decrease the risk of LBW and macrosomia, respectively mainly in North Shaanxi and South Shaanxi. The snacks pattern during pregnancy may cause abnormal birth weight (e.g. LBW, macrosomia, SGA) among infants, especially in Central and South Shaanxi. The findings emphasize the importance of geographical distribution to improve the dietary patterns among disadvantaged pregnant women.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression in South Shaanxi.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression in Central Shaanxi.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression in North Shaanxi.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. The characteristics of dietary patterns among pregnant women (n 7934) in Shaanxi province, Northwest China, 2013.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Geographical distribution of the incidence of LBW among the live infants in Shaanxi province, 2013.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Geographical distribution of the incidence of macrosomia among the live infants in Shaanxi province, 2013.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Geographical distribution of the incidence of SGA among the live infants in Shaanxi province, 2013.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Geographical distribution of the incidence of LGA among the live infants in Shaanxi province, 2013.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of equilibrium pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of SGA.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of snacks pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of LBW.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of snacks pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of macrosomia.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of snacks pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of SGA.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of prudent pattern of T1, as associated with prevalence of LBW.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of prudent pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of LBW.

(TIF)

S11 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of prudent pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of macrosomia.

(TIF)

S1 Data

(SAV)

Acknowledgments

We thank the women and their children participated in our study. We thank local hospitals and health bureau as well as the Ministry of Health in Shaanxi province.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The study was supported by National Natural Science of Foundation of China (No. 81602928, 81541069) and Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2017JM8102). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We certify that all authors have not financial interest related to the work of this paper. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Meanwhile, there are no prior publications or submissions with any overlapping information, including studies and patients. We have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. To the best of our knowledge and belief, this manuscript has not been published in whole or in part nor is it being considered for publication elsewhere.

References

  • 1.Stephens TV, Woo H, Innis SM, Elango R. Healthy pregnant women in Canada are consuming more dietary protein at 16- and 36-week gestation than currently recommended by the Dietary Reference Intakes, primarily from dairy food sources. Nutr Res. 2014. Jul;34(7):569–576. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.07.001 Epub 2014 Jul 8. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cetin I, Berti C, Calabrese S. Role of micronutrients in the periconceptional period. Hum Reprod Update. 2010. Jan-Feb;16(1):80–95. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp025 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wrottesley SV, Lamper C, Pisa PT. Review of the importance of nutrition during the first 1000 days: maternal nutritional status and its associations with fetal growth and birth, neonatal and infant outcomes among African women. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2016. Apr;7(2):144–162. doi: 10.1017/S2040174415001439 Epub 2015 Aug 17. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paknahad Z, Fallah A, Moravejolahkami AR. Maternal Dietary Patterns and Their Association with Pregnancy Outcomes. Clin Nutr Res. 2019. Jan 25;8(1):64–73. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2019.8.1.64 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002. Feb;13(1):3–9. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200202000-00002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Völgyi E, Carroll KN, Hare ME, Ringwald-Smith K, Piyathilake C, Yoo W, et al. Dietary patterns in pregnancy and effects on nutrient intake in the Mid-South: the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood (CANDLE) study. Nutrients. 2013. May 3;5(5):1511–1530. doi: 10.3390/nu5051511 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thompson JM, Wall C, Becroft DM, Robinson E, Wild CJ, Mitchell EA. Maternal dietary patterns in pregnancy and the association with small-for-gestational-age infants. Br J Nutr. 2010. Jun;103(11):1665–1673. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509993606 Epub 2010 Mar 9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Northstone K, Emmett PM, Rogers I. Dietary patterns in pregnancy and associations with nutrient intakes. Br J Nutr. 2008. Feb;99(2):406–415. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507803977 Epub 2007 Sep 3. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bukowski R, Hansen NI, Willinger M, Reddy UM, Parker CB, Pinar H, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Fetal growth and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case-control study. PLoS Med. 2014. Apr 22;11(4):e1001633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001633 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grissom NM, Reyes TM. Gestational overgrowth and undergrowth affect neurodevelopment: similarities and differences from behavior to epigenetics. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2013. Oct;31(6):406–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2012.11.006 Epub 2012 Nov 28. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wennerström EC, Simonsen J, Melbye M. Long-Term Survival of Individuals Born Small and Large for Gestational Age. PLoS One. 2015. Sep 21;10(9):e0138594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138594 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Francis JH, Permezel M, Davey MA. Perinatal mortality by birthweight centile. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014. Aug;54(4):354–359. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12205 Epub 2014 Apr 15. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pei L, Kang Y, Zhao Y, Yan H. Prevalence and risk factors of congenital heart defects among live births: a population-based cross-sectional survey in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China. BMC Pediatr. 2017. Jan 13;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0784-1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheng Y, Dibley MJ, Zhang X, Zeng L, Yan H. Assessment of dietary intake among pregnant women in a rural area of western China. BMC Public Health. 2009. Jul 9;9:222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-222 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cheng Y, Yan H, Dibley MJ, Shen Y, Li Q, Zeng L. Validity and reproducibility of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use among pregnant women in rural China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(1):166–177. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) China Food Composition Book 1, 2nd ed. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jie L. Obstetrics and Gynecology [M]. 8 version. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2013. pp.47–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ikem E, Halldorsson TI, Birgisdóttir BE, Rasmussen MA, Olsen SF, Maslova E. Dietary patterns and the risk of pregnancy-associated hypertension in the Danish National Birth Cohort: a prospective longitudinal study. BJOG. 2019. Apr;126(5):663–673. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15593 Epub 2019 Jan 24. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, Boeing H. An approach to construct simplified measures of dietary patterns from exploratory factor analysis. Br J Nutr. 2003. Mar;89(3):409–419. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002778 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shi Z, Hu X, Yuan B, Pan X, Dai Y, Holmboe-Ottesen G. Association between dietary patterns and anaemia in adults from Jiangsu Province in Eastern China. Br J Nutr. 2006. Nov;96(5):906–912. doi: 10.1017/bjn20061785 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang TC, Matthews SA. Understanding the non-stationary associations between distrust of the health care system, health conditions, and self-rated health in the elderly: a geographically weighted regression approach. Health Place. 2012. May;18(3):576–585. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.01.007 Epub 2012 Jan 28. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou YB, Wang QX, Liang S, Gong YH, Yang MX, Chen Y, et al. Geographical variations in risk factors associated with HIV infection among drug users in a prefecture in Southwest China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015. Sep 2;4:38. doi: 10.1186/s40249-015-0073-x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nakaya T, Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. Geographically weighted Poisson regression for disease association mapping. Stat Med. 2005. Sep 15;24(17):2695–2717. doi: 10.1002/sim.2129 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.He JR, Yuan MY, Chen NN, Lu JH, Hu CY, Mai WB, et al. Maternal dietary patterns and gestational diabetes mellitus: a large prospective cohort study in China. Br J Nutr. 2015. Apr 28;113(8):1292–1300. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000707 Epub 2015 Mar 30. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mi W, Lian W, Yang M, Jiang Y, Yi W, Wang Y, et al. Analysis on dietary patterns and influencing factors among the elderly in Yantai City. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2017. Jan;46(1):27–31. Chinese. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luksiene DI, Baceviciene M, Tamosiunas A, Daugeliene E, Kranciukaite D. Health, alcohol and psychosocial factors in Eastern Europe study: dietary patterns and their association with socio-demographic factors in the Lithuanian urban population of Kaunas city. Int J Public Health. 2011. Apr;56(2):209–216. doi: 10.1007/s00038-010-0170-3 Epub 2010 Aug 12. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carniel EF, Zanolli ML, Antonio MARGM, Morcillo AM. Determinantes do baixo peso ao nascer a partir das Declarações de Nascidos Vivos.[J]. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. 2008;11(1):169–179. doi: 10.1590/S1415-790X2008000100016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cucó G, Fernández-Ballart J, Sala J, Viladrich C, Iranzo R, Vila J, et al. Dietary patterns and associated lifestyles in preconception, pregnancy and postpartum. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006. Mar;60(3):364–71. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602324 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ferrer C, Garcia-Esteban R, Mendez M, Robieu I, Sunyer MTJ. Determinantes sociales de los patrones dietéticos durante el embarazo[J]. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2009;23(1):38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Northstone K, Emmett P, Rogers I. Dietary patterns in pregnancy and associations with socio-demographic and lifestyle factors. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008. Apr;62(4):471–479. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602741 Epub 2007 Mar 21. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Taylor MK, Sullivan DK, Ellerbeck EF, Gajewski BJ, Gibbs HD. Nutrition literacy predicts adherence to healthy/unhealthy diet patterns in adults with a nutrition-related chronic condition. Public Health Nutr. 2019. Aug;22(12):2157–2169. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001289 Epub 2019 May 31. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cheng C.K. The culture of Chinese diet: Regional differentiation and developing trends[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1994, 49(3): 226–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Song F, Cho MS. Geography of Food Consumption Patterns between South and North China. Foods. 2017. May 5;6(5):34. doi: 10.3390/foods6050034 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang J, Lin X, Bloomgarden ZT, Ning G. The Jiangnan diet, a healthy diet pattern for Chinese. J Diabetes. 2020. May;12(5):365–371. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13015 Epub 2020 Jan 26. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hajianfar H, Esmaillzadeh A, Feizi A, Shahshahan Z, Azadbakht L. The Association Between Major Dietary Patterns and Pregnancy-related Complications. Arch Iran Med. 2018. Oct 1;21(10):443–451. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang D, He Y, Li Y, Luan D, Yang X, Zhai F, et al. Dietary patterns and hypertension among Chinese adults: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011. Dec 14;11:925. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-925 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shang X, Li Y, Liu A, Zhang Q, Hu X, Du S, et al. Dietary pattern and its association with the prevalence of obesity and related cardiometabolic risk factors among Chinese children. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043183 Epub 2012 Aug 14. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Flynn AC, Schneeberger C, Seed PT, Barr S, Poston L, Goff LM. The Effects of the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial Intervention on Dietary Patterns in Obese Pregnant Women Participating in a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutr Metab Insights. 2016. Jun 27;8(Suppl 1):79–86. doi: 10.4137/NMI.S29529 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Diemert A, Lezius S, Pagenkemper M, Hansen G, Drozdowska A, Hecher K, et al. Maternal nutrition, inadequate gestational weight gain and birth weight: results from a prospective birth cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. Aug 15;16:224. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1012-y . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Flynn AC, Seed PT, Patel N, Barr S, Bell R, Briley AL, et al. UPBEAT consortium. Dietary patterns in obese pregnant women; influence of a behavioral intervention of diet and physical activity in the UPBEAT randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016. Nov 29;13(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0450-2 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Coelho Nde L, Cunha DB, Esteves AP, Lacerda EM, Theme Filha MM. Dietary patterns in pregnancy and birth weight. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:62. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005403 Epub 2015 Sep 18. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Uusitalo U, Arkkola T, Ovaskainen ML, Kronberg-Kippilä C, Kenward MG, Veijola R, et al. Unhealthy dietary patterns are associated with weight gain during pregnancy among Finnish women. Public Health Nutr. 2009. Dec;12(12):2392–2399. doi: 10.1017/S136898000900528X Epub 2009 Mar 27. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Frank T Spradley

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

9 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-40026

Geographical variations in maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy associated with birth weight in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pei,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

An expert in the field handled your manuscript, and we are very appreciative of their time and contributions. Although some interest was found in your study, several major comments arose. Please address ALL of the reviewer's comments in your revised manuscript.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 20 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Frank T. Spradley

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information, or include a citation if it has been published previously.

4. In statistical methods, please refer to any post-hoc corrections to correct for multiple comparisons during your statistical analyses. If these were not performed please justify the reasons. Please refer to our statistical reporting guidelines for assistance (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting).

5. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

At this time, please address the following queries:

  1. Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

  2. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

  3. If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

  4. If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

6. We note that Figures 1-3 and Supporting Figures 1-11 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

6.1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1-3 and Supporting Figures 1-11 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

6.2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

7. Thank you for submitting the above manuscript to PLOS ONE. During our internal evaluation of the manuscript, we found significant text overlap between your submission and the following previously published works, some of which you are an author.

- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-69788-0

- https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/339BB3F814A892B08496A19E889B405A/S1368980016002159a.pdf/dietary_intakes_and_dietary_patterns_among_pregnant_women_in_northwest_china.pdf

- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32737435/

- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389420303654?via%3Dihub

- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-07076-0?code=a32ec384-3b72-4a76-bf86-568a96975613&error=cookies_not_supported

We would like to make you aware that copying extracts from previous publications, especially outside the methods section, word-for-word is unacceptable. In addition, the reproduction of text from published reports has implications for the copyright that may apply to the publications.

Please revise the manuscript to rephrase the duplicated text, cite your sources, and provide details as to how the current manuscript advances on previous work. Please note that further consideration is dependent on the submission of a manuscript that addresses these concerns about the overlap in text with published work.

We will carefully review your manuscript upon resubmission, so please ensure that your revision is thorough.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a fascinating manuscript. However, confirmation must be added to provide better detail.

Please consider adding confirmation to respond to a question or consider revising the manuscript following the file review below.

A.1. Line 81. The survey was held from August to November 2013. Line 82, the objects were live birth born during 2010-2013. Kindly add specific time as inclusion criteria of this study to describe the study object more clearly e.g Baby born in January-August 2013 . Add in the method section.

A.2. Line 82. Material and methods. The diet survey questionnaire was used on the basis of the respondent's ability to recall history during pregnancy. Certainly, it has potential reminder bias.The subjects in this analysis are live baby mothers born in 2010-2013. It indicates different age ranges.

How does the author control the reminder bias based on different birth dates, e.g., the neonate mother (0-28 days) can remember better a dietary frequency than moms between 12-44 months of age? Perhaps you can explain the method of quality control.

A.3. Line 89. Why did the author make a different number of babies born as a topic in a rural and urban area? Ten villages and 20 communities? Depending on the number of children born in both areas? Has the author found a list of babies born in every county in urban or rural areas? Are the samples selected by the proportionate probability size (PPS) method? If yes. Please add in the process.If not, does the author use a weight to statistical analysis?

A.4. Line 130. Did the pattern equilibrium, snack, and prudent was derived from the explanatory factor/ confirmatory factor? Before taking PCA analysis? Add in the method.

What software was used to doing PCA in this study? SPSS? STATA? Describe in this section.

A.5. If available, please identify geographical areas and add on the results section too? It is essential, the readers know about the classification, maybe most of the geographical kind, of three classified areas (northern, central, and southern), which is the coastal area? Mountainous? High land? For Urban, it is metropolitan, small-town Probably it related to different dietary trends

A.6. Line 175. Most of the respondents live in central province Shaanxi. Is the distribution of participant influence in the dietary pattern? Maybe potential to be modified factor. Please explain how the author took a sample from this large survey for this study purposes in the Methods section.

Why did the author consider using the whole data of a large survey? Did the author consider resampling to this analysis purposes so it can representative in three areas? Due to the aim study to comparing three area?

A.7. Is the author want to compare three areas? The author shows the distribution of dietary patterns based on geographical area, while the author also shows the participant proportion based on three areas is different (unbalanced). The various distribution proportions on the three areas potentially be a modifying factor. In table 2, we can see a significantly different dietary pattern between the three areas based on the X2 test. How the author control this issue?

A.8. Table 2. Kindly show the number of samples n (%) to shows balanced samples in each category.

A.9. Line 174 shows the different distribution of study participants. Has the author previously checked the various respondents' distribution in this area, probably influence this significance? Potential to be modified factor due to unbalanced distribution of samples, or consider reporting the effect in each region

(stratification) in multivariate if the study investigates the association between risk factor of birth outcome.

A.10. Table 2 and 3. For association purposes, the author can include adjusted p value from the multivariate analysis in this table with different mark, e.g ††

A.11. Line 220. We suggest not to use “varied in line 220“ because the proportion shows a slight difference.

A.12. Table 3. Refers to comment A10, to add p value multivariat analysis with different mark ††

A.13. Table 4. There is no socio-demographic characteristic was shown in this table, is only the dietary pattern that was a significant association with the birth outcome ? kindly add in the complete information in the previous table for socio demographics characteristic for multivariate test

A.14. General comment for table 5. How is it far different using nonspatial logistic regression and GWR?

A.15. Line 307 . Does it mean the different patterns mostly influenced by altitude? Why didn’t the author show others based on the rural and urban type of area

A.16. Line 354. Birth weight outcomes have close relation with the BMI of the mother (nutrition status of pregnant). Did the author consider this variable in their analysis or take in the limitation study.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-40026-review_resume.pdf

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-40026_reviewer comments (1)-submit01022020.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254891.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


21 Jun 2021

A.1. Line 81. The survey was held from August to November 2013. Line 82, the objects were live birth born during 2010-2013. Kindly add specific time as inclusion criteria of this study to describe the study object more clearly e.g Baby born in January- August 2013. Add in the method section.

Reply: We are thankful for you to point out the detailed problem. The specific content has been revised in the method section.

A.2. Line 82. Material and methods. The diet survey questionnaire was used on the basis of the respondent's ability to recall history during pregnancy. Certainly, it has potential reminder bias.The subjects in this analysis are live baby mothers born in 2010-2013. It indicates different age ranges.

How does the author control the reminder bias based on different birth dates, e.g., the neonate mother (0-28 days) can remember better a dietary frequency than moms between 12-44 months of age? Perhaps you can explain the method of quality control.

Reply: Thanks very much for your question. Because the reported information was self-reported by mothers, the duration of time that had elapsed between pregnancy and the maternal self-report may have contributed to recall bias. Different degree of reminder bias based on different birth dates is also one of the limitations of our cross-sectional survey. Actually, this limitation should be considered while interpreting our results. In terms of quality control, all questionnaires and procedures were pre-tested, and detailed interviewer guides were developed before the formal survey. We also consciously adopted systematic approaches to maximize power and minimize bias in the study.

A.3. Line 89. Why did the author make a different number of babies born as a topic in a rural and urban area? Ten villages and 20 communities? Depending on the number of children born in both areas? Has the author found a list of babies born in every county in urban or rural areas? Are the samples selected by the proportionate probability size (PPS) method? If yes. Please add in the process. If not, does the author use a weight to statistical analysis?

Reply: Thanks for pointing out the question. For the current study, the samples were selected by the proportionate probability size (PPS) method, according to the proportion of urban and rural areas, and considering the population density and fertility level. The differences between urban and rural areas in this sample were mainly determined according to the total population of urban and rural areas in the whole province so that the sample was representative.

Actually, the study data had been conducted a series of researches and published many articles. As follows:

[1]. Pei, L. L., Kang, Y. J., Cheng, Y. &Yan, H. The Association of Maternal Lifestyle with Birth Defects in Shaanxi Province, Northwest China. PLoS One.2015. 10: e0139452.

[2]. Pei, L. L., Kang, Y. J., Zhao, Y. L. &Yan, H. Prevalence and risk factors of congenital heart defects among live births: a population-based cross-sectional survey in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China. BMC Pediatrics.2017. 17: 18.

[3]. Liu Y, Zhang H, Li J, et al. Geographical variations in maternal lifestyles during pregnancy associated with congenital heart defects among live births in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China[J]. Sci Rep. 2020, 10(1): 12958.

A.4. Line 130. Did the pattern equilibrium, snack, and prudent was derived from the explanatory factor/ confirmatory factor? Before taking PCA analysis? Add in the method. What software was used to? SPSS? STATA? Describe in this section.

Reply: We should apologize for the avoidable errors in the manuscript. The equilibrium, snacks, and prudent pattern were extracted by principal component analysis (PCA), not factor analysis, which was an expression error. Meanwhile, SPSS software was used to doing PCA in this study. We have corrected the errors in the original manuscript in the methods section.

5. A.5. If available, please identify geographical areas and add on the results section too? It is essential, the readers know about the classification, maybe most of the geographical kind, of three classified areas (northern, central, and southern), which is the coastal area? Mountainous? High land? For Urban, it is metropolitan, small-town. Probably it related to different dietary trends.

Reply: First of all, thanks for your valuable opinion. Shaanxi is a landlocked province in Northwest China and spans a wide latitude. From south to north, Shaanxi is divided into three physiographic regions by the North Mountains and the Qin Mountains. These three parts are North Shaanxi, Central Shaanxi, and South Shaanxi. North Shaanxi is a plateau, 900-1500 meters above sea level. The winter in North Shaanxi is chilly, and the difference in temperature between day and night is big. Central Shaanxi is a plain, 520 meters above sea level. The summer is very hot, and the winter is dry and cold. South Shaanxi is a mountainous region with an elevation of about 1500-3000 meters. Summer is the rainy period in South Shaanxi, and winter is chilly. Shaanxi’s agricultural production varies throughout the province. Shaanxi’s northern plateau grows spring-sown wheat and millet. Central Shaanxi is an important producing area of wheat and corn in north China. South Shaanxi is the main producing area of rice and cole. There are also significant differences in the economic conditions of different regions,the specific situation is as follows. According to data from the Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics in 2011, per capita GDP in northern Shaanxi was 61,402 yuan, that in Central Shaanxi was 32,892 yuan, and that in South Shaanxi was 16,912 yuan.

https://cn.bing.com/search?q=Shaanxi&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=shaanxi&sc=8-7&sk=&cvid=D9A6A35C5B024905914905ADF5A5D420

A.6. Line 175. Most of the respondents live in central province Shaanxi. Is the distribution of participant influence in the dietary pattern? Maybe potential to be modified factor. Please explain how the author took a sample from this large survey for this study purposes in the Methods section. Why did the author consider using the whole data of a large survey? Did the author consider resampling to this analysis purposes so it can representative in three areas? Due to the aim study to comparing three area?

Reply: I am very grateful for your comments on the manuscript. According to the Sixth national population census data of Shaanxi Province in 2010 released by the National Bureau of Statistics, the population ratios of South Shaanxi, Central Shaanxi, and North Shaanxi were 22.5%, 62.7%, and 14.8% respectively. It can be seen that the population distribution of different areas in Shaanxi Province was originally unbalanced. Meanwhile, the proportion of births in 2011 was 22.4% in South Shaanxi, 61.2% in Central Shaanxi, and 16.4% in North Shaanxi according to the Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Therefore, the samples investigated in this study are representative to some extent in the three areas. Detailed sampling methods were in the Methods section.

A.7. Is the author want to compare three areas? The author shows the distribution of dietary patterns based on geographical area, while the author also shows the participant proportion based on three areas is different (unbalanced). The various distribution proportions on the three areas potentially be a modifying factor. In table 2, we can see a significantly different dietary pattern between the three areas based on the X2 test. How the author control this issue?

Reply: We are thankful for you to point out the potential problems. Firstly, according to the statistics bureau, the distribution of birth population in different regions of Shaanxi province is uneven, and the sample size can basically represent the situation of the whole province. Secondly, we supplemented the results of regional stratification analysis to control for the influence of different areas on dietary patterns, as detailed in the supplementary tables. Finally, this study controlled for the impact of geographical differences through the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, which was the focus of our study.

A.8. Table 2. Kindly show the number of samples n (%) to shows balanced samples in each category.

Reply: Thanks very much for your advice. We have made corresponding changes in Table 2.

A.9. Line 174 shows the different distribution of study participants. Has the author previously checked the various respondents' distribution in this area, probably influence this significance? Potential to be modified factor due to unbalanced distribution of samples, or consider reporting the effect in each region (stratification) in multivariate if the study investigates the association between risk factor of birth outcome.

Reply: Thank you very much for your question and valuable advice. We supplemented the results of regional stratification analysis to control for the impact of uneven distribution of dietary patterns on the risk of birth outcomes in different regions, as detailed in supplementary tables 1-3.

A.10. Table 2 and 3. For association purposes, the author can include adjusted p value from the multivariate analysis in this table with different mark, e.g ††.

Reply: Thanks very much for your advice. For the characteristics of dietary patterns among pregnant women in Shaanxi province, we included adjusted p-value from the multivariate analysis in supplementary table 4. For the baseline characteristics of the study population in Shaanxi province, univariate and multivariate analyses have been carried out in this study, as shown in Table 4, so repeat analysis is not considered.

A.11. Line 220. We suggest not to use “varied in line 220” because the proportion shows a slight difference.

Reply: Thanks for pointing out my problem. We have made corresponding modifications in the results section on Line 229.

A.12. Table 3. Refers to comment A10, to add p value multivariat analysis with different mark ††.

Reply: Thanks for your comments. The same circumstance with A10, the multivariate analysis as detailed in the supplementary Table 4.

A.13. Table 4. There is no socio-demographic characteristic was shown in this table, is only the dietary pattern that was a significant association with the birth outcome? kindly add in the complete information in the previous table for socio demographics characteristic for multivariate test.

Reply: We think your comment is very important for us to improve the manuscript. We mainly studied the relationship between dietary patterns and birth outcomes, socio-demographic characteristics were not the focus of this study. Considering the completeness of the results, the complete information of multivariate analysis was shown in Supplementary Table 5.

A.14. General comment for table 5. How is it far different using nonspatial logistic regression and GWR?

Reply: Thanks for your comments. We think your suggestion is very helpful. Due to the limitation of the data in this study, we only discussed the differences in the specific results of different regression models without further discussion. This was also a slight deficiency of this study, and we look forward to better improvement in the future.

A.15. Line 307 . Does it mean the different patterns mostly influenced by altitude? Why didn’t the author show others based on the rural and urban type of area.

Reply: Thanks for pointing out the question. The area altitude is only one part of the geographical environment factors that may influence the distribution of dietary patterns. The rural and urban types of the area have been eliminated in the previous data analysis process.

A.16. Line 354. Birth weight outcomes have close relation with the BMI of the mother (nutrition status of pregnant). Did the author consider this variable in their analysis or take in the limitation study.

Reply: Thanks very much for your question. Actually, this limitation should be considered while interpreting our results, although the analysis was adjusted for some socio-demographic confounders during pregnancy, the study was still subject to other potential confounders such as maternal nutrition status of pregnant (BMI). Considering the current situation of this study data, we have included this variable in the limitation study.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer.docx

Decision Letter 1

Frank T Spradley

7 Jul 2021

Geographical variations in maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy associated with birth weight in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China

PONE-D-20-40026R1

Dear Dr. Pei,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Frank T. Spradley

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Author have answered all of reviewer comments .

review

A.1 : ok, author has been changed in method section

A.2 : ok, enough explanation. The author has been controlled a potential reminder bias and they also add in the limitation study

A.3 : ok, PPS method sampling was used by the author and they have considered some criteria to show the representative area

A.4 : ok

A.5 : ok, the author have shown in the results section to give more clearly about geographical area description. line 180-183

A.6 : ok

A.7 : ok

A.8 : ok

A.9 :ok

A.10 : ok

A.11 : ok, the authors have made corresponding modifications

A.12 : ok

A.13 : ok

A.14 : ok

A.15 : ok

A.16 : ok, the author have explained in the end of discussion as limitation of study

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Frank T Spradley

14 Jul 2021

PONE-D-20-40026R1

Geographical variations in maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy associated with birth weight in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China

Dear Dr. Pei:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Frank T. Spradley

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression in South Shaanxi.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression in Central Shaanxi.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression in North Shaanxi.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. The characteristics of dietary patterns among pregnant women (n 7934) in Shaanxi province, Northwest China, 2013.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. The association of diet pattern with abnormal birth outcomes using non-spatial logistical regression.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Geographical distribution of the incidence of LBW among the live infants in Shaanxi province, 2013.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Geographical distribution of the incidence of macrosomia among the live infants in Shaanxi province, 2013.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Geographical distribution of the incidence of SGA among the live infants in Shaanxi province, 2013.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Geographical distribution of the incidence of LGA among the live infants in Shaanxi province, 2013.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of equilibrium pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of SGA.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of snacks pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of LBW.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of snacks pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of macrosomia.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of snacks pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of SGA.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of prudent pattern of T1, as associated with prevalence of LBW.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of prudent pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of LBW.

    (TIF)

    S11 Fig. Geographical distribution of adjusted ORs of prudent pattern of T3, as associated with prevalence of macrosomia.

    (TIF)

    S1 Data

    (SAV)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-40026-review_resume.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-40026_reviewer comments (1)-submit01022020.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES