Abstract
Jaw lesions in the pediatric population, although infrequently encountered in clinical practice, can cause functional impairment and cosmetic disfiguring. It is further complicated by the difficulty in diagnosis due to complex anatomy and facial developmental process during infancy and childhood. Intraosseous pediatric jaw lesions may vary from odontogenic to nonodontogenic types with nonspecific clinical features in most cases. They deserve careful attention by a systematic approach to provide a relevant diagnosis or differential diagnosis for timely management. Imaging plays a major role in diagnosis with orthopantomograph being the foremost investigation, followed by cross-sectional imaging, essentially computed tomography as a problem-solving tool. This article highlights the imaging spectrum of various jaw lesions in the pediatric population with a pattern-based approach for radiological diagnosis.
Keywords: computed tomography, jaw lesion, nonodontogenic, odontogenic, orthopantomograph, pediatric
Introduction
Various physiological changes with rapid growth and development process in the maxillofacial area during the mixed dentition period in children affect the growth potential of tumors and tumorlike lesions with considerable significant morbidity. 1 As in adults, pediatric jaw lesions can arise from odontogenic or nonodontogenic tissues; however, the majority of pediatric jaw lesions are nonodontogenic and benign in nature. The high prevalence of dental disease in children results in inflammatory, infective, and reactive processes having substantial overlap in imaging features with more serious locally aggressive tumors or malignant conditions, thereby requiring invasive tissue diagnosis for proper management in some cases. 1 2
The radiological diagnosis of various jaw lesions is based on the patient’s history, location of the lesion, and characteristic radiographic alteration of the lesion as well as adjacent structures. Multiple imaging modalities, like orthopantomograph (OPG), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), cone beam CT (CBCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are available for the workup of jaw lesions. 2 3
MRI is a useful adjunct to CT, because of its superior soft-tissue contrast, better delineation of internal components of a lesion, and ability to assess the involvement of the bone marrow in infectious and malignant processes affecting the jaw. 1 3
Since information obtained from CT and MRI is often complementary, the use of a modality is also governed by institutional practice and availability. Moreover, some of the disadvantages like long scan time, need for sedation of small children, and high cost limit the use of MRI.
Although imaging findings may not lead to a specific diagnosis, they do help narrow the differential diagnosis and guide further workup. Certain lesions like aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) with characteristic diagnostic imaging appearance do not need biopsy, whereas for other lesions, imaging may help select the appropriate biopsy site. 1 2
This article provides a systematic comprehensive imaging approach essentially using the OPG and MDCT features along with clinical presentation to provide the diagnosis or appropriate differential diagnosis of jaw lesions in patients younger than 18 years.
The lesions of the jaw are classified broadly into cysts and tumors of the jaw with further subclassifications into their odontogenic and nonodontogenic counterparts. The latest edition of the classification of odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors was published by World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017. 4 5 Table 1 shows the classification of odontogenic cysts and tumors of the jaw modified from the updated WHO classification.
Table 1. Classification of odontogenic cysts and tumors of jaw (Modified from WHO 2017 classification) 4 5 .
Odontogenic cysts |
---|
Odontogenic inflammatory cysts |
Radicular cyst |
Collateral inflammatory cysts |
Odontogenic developmental cyst |
Dentigerous cyst |
Odontogenic keratocyst |
Lateral periodontal and botryoid odontogenic cyst |
Gingival cyst |
Glandular odontogenic cyst |
Calcifying odontogenic cyst |
Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst |
Odontogenic tumors |
Benign epithelial odontogenic tumors: |
Ameloblastoma (conventional, unicystic, extraosseous/peripheral, and metastasizing/malignant type) |
Squamous odontogenic tumor |
Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor |
Calcified epithelial odontogenic tumor |
Benign mesenchymal odontogenic tumors: |
Odontogenic myxoma or myxofibroma |
Odontogenic fibroma |
Cementoblastoma |
Cemento-ossifying fibroma |
Benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal odontogenic tumors |
Odontoma (compound and complex type) |
Ameloblastic fibroma |
Primordial odontogenic tumor |
Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor |
Malignant odontogenic tumors (not seen in children) |
Approach to Imaging Evaluation of Jaw Lesions in Children
The pediatric jaw contains 20 teeth, 10 each in the maxilla and mandible, with lack of premolars and third molars. Two important components of tooth are the crown (enamel-covered superior portion of the tooth) and the root (inferior portion covered with the cementum). Tooth-related jaw lesions are termed “pericoronal,” if associated with the crown of the tooth and “periapical” if it is around the apex of the root. 6
The first step in the evaluation of jaw lesions is taking the clinical history and identifying the age of the patient.
The next step is to look for the anatomical location of the lesion within the maxilla or the mandible and relationship of the lesion to the adjacent tooth and the inferior alveolar canal. The predilection of a lesion to occur at a particular site in the jaw also helps narrow the differential diagnosis. 7 8 9 The lesions seen above the inferior alveolar canal are usually odontogenic, whereas nonodontogenic lesions are seen below it. Rarely, widening of the inferior alveolar canal may represent lesions of vascular or neural origin. 7
Radiologically, jaw lesions are grouped into three categories on the basis of density: radiolucent, radiopaque, and mixed-density lesions. More than 80% of lesions are radiolucent, whereas most mixed-density lesions are attributed to fibro-osseous lesions, inflammatory or malignant etiologies. 7
For an odontogenic lesion, the exact location of the lesion with reference to the tooth, whether pericoronal or periapical, is to be looked for.
Characteristics on imaging, such as lesion border, locularity, zone of transition, and multiplicity, are of utmost importance for diagnostic differentiation. A well-marginated unilocular radiolucent lesion is likely due to a slow-growing benign process. However, a multilocular lesion with defined margins and narrow transition zone may represent an aggressive benign process. 7 8
Other important imaging features that help in characterization of jaw lesions are bone expansion, cortical integrity, periosteal reaction, perilesional halo, growth pattern of the lesion whether along the long axis or perpendicular to jaw bones, and effect on surrounding structures and associated soft tissue. Displacement of teeth generally represents a slow-growing lesion. In addition, slow-growing benign processes usually result in directional resorption of tooth secondary to pressure effects, whereas malignant lesions can often show a nondirectional resorption of teeth due to destruction of the lamina dura. 7
Typical characteristics of benign jaw lesion on CT are well-defined borders with a narrow zone of transition, cortical expansion and/or cortical bowing, displacement of adjacent structures, and directional root resorption. In malignant lesions, characteristic CT features are ill-defined margins, wide transition zone, cortical breach, periosteal reaction, and associated soft tissue. However, certain aggressive infective and inflammatory lesions may also show associated soft tissue due to infiltration of adjacent structures with nondirectional root resorption. 6 7 Fig. 1 shows the imaging approach to evaluation of jaw lesions in children.
Imaging features of some common, uncommon neoplastic and nonneoplastic jaw lesions in the pediatric population are summarized in this article with emphasis on key diagnostic features.
Odontogenic Lesions
Odontogenic lesions typically involve only one tooth or a specific part of the tooth and are usually above the inferior alveolar canal. They do not generally cause pain due to their slow-growth tendency and therefore are often detected incidentally.
Radiolucent Lesions
Radicular (Periapical) Cyst
The radicular cyst is the most common acquired odontogenic cyst that arises from epithelial cell rests of periodontal ligament. This cyst is usually associated with tooth infection and nonvital tooth. 3 On CT, it appears as a unilocular radiolucent periapical lesion with well-defined, sclerotic borders in close vicinity of the apical portion of the root of a nonvital carious tooth, most commonly the upper lateral incisor. 3 10 Residual cyst is the periapical cyst retained in the jaw after surgical removal of a nonvital tooth. 3
Dentigerous (Follicular) Cyst
Dentigerous cysts are the most common developmental cysts of odontogenic origin, arising from the dental follicle of a developing or an unerupted tooth. 2 3 They are typically diagnosed in the age group of 20 to 40 years. When large, these cysts show significant buccolingual expansion and thinning of cortices with predisposition to infection or pathological fracture. On CT, they appear as a well-circumscribed unilocular pericoronal area of radiolucency with sclerotic borders around the crown of an unerupted tooth, typically the lower third molar followed by the maxillary third molar ( Fig. 2 ). 3 10 The crown generally protrudes into the cyst, whereas the root of the affected tooth is outside the lesion, and the distance between the crown and the dental sac is usually greater than 3 mm. 3 Convergence of cyst walls at the cementoenamel junction is an important diagnostic clue. 7
Odontogenic Keratocyst
The odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is now reclassified under the developmental odontogenic cyst. OKC was placed under the category of odontogenic tumors in the 2005 classification, due to its aggressive behavior. 4 11 It arises from the dental lamina and has a characteristic lining of uniform stratified squamous epithelium with palisading and overlying corrugated parakeratin layer. 4 A high recurrence rate after surgery is seen because of aggressive and infiltrative behavior along with the presence of daughter cysts in the adjacent bone. 3 OKC appears as unilocular or multilocular lytic lesion with well-corticated margins typically involving the posterior body or ascending ramus of the mandible. 3 9 10 Important diagnostic clue is tendency of growth within the medullary space along the length of bone in an anteroposterior direction with minimal buccolingual expansion, which helps differentiation of a unilocular OKC with the crown of an unerupted tooth from the dentigerous cyst. 7 10 Root resorption is uncommon, and weak enhancement of the uniformly thin and regular cyst walls with no obvious soft tissue helps differentiation from unilocular ameloblastoma. Multiple OKCs are seen in the Gorlin–Goltz syndrome ( Fig. 3 ), Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, and Noonan’s syndrome. In addition to multiple OKCs, the Gorlin–Golz syndrome shows basal cell nevi, skeletal abnormalities, mental retardation, and falx cerebri calcifications. 3 10
Ameloblastoma
Ameloblastoma is a benign but locally invasive, slow-growing odontogenic tumor that arises from the enamel-forming cells of odontogenic epithelium. It can also arise from the pluripotential epithelial lining of an odontogenic cyst (5%; Fig. 4 ). 1 10 Conventional ameloblastomas are typically seen in the third to fourth decade of life; however, unicystic forms can be seen in children and adolescent and show lower recurrence rate. The different histopathological subtypes of ameloblastoma are follicular (most common), plexiform, acanthomatous, granular cell, basaloid, and desmoplastic. 4 Patients present with painless slow-growing mass most commonly in the posterior mandible (80%), typically in the third molar region. On imaging, unicystic ameloblastoma appears as a unilocular well-corticated lucent lesion with significant buccolingual expansion and solid nodular soft-tissue component ( Fig. 5 )—a feature that differentiates it from odontogenic keratocyst and dentigerous cysts. 9 10 12 Larger lesions may cause tooth displacement or root resorption. Conventional ameloblastoma appears classically as multilocular expansile radiolucent lesions with a soap bubble or honeycomb appearance. 7 10
Odontogenic Myxoma
Odontogenic myxoma is a locally aggressive infiltrating benign true odontogenic tumor originating from the mesodermal portion of odontogenic apparatus. 1 10 It commonly occurs in 10- to 30-year-olds and presents as a slow-growing painless lesion with equal incidence in the maxilla and the mandible (ramus being most common mandibular site). 10 Rapid growth of the tumor results in extensive osseous destruction and perforation of cortex with extension into surrounding soft tissues. 1 10 On CT, it appears as a unilocular or multilocular lytic lesion separated by internal delicate bony trabeculae that form geographic compartments with a “tennis racket” appearance ( Fig. 6 ). 1 10 12 Root resorption and teeth displacement may occur. 7 10 Appearance may resemble hemangioma, central giant cell granulomas (CGCGs), and ameloblastoma. However, MRI may help by showing T2 high signal intensities due to abundant myxoid stroma. On contrast administration, odontogenic myxoma shows a gradual enhancement pattern as against the avid enhancement in hemangioma. 10 12 Histologically, they show hypocellular stellate cells in the myxoid background. 4
Radiopaque Lesions
Cementoblastoma
Cementoblastomas are benign odontogenic periapical neoplasms that arise from the cementum in children and young adults. Fifty percent of patients with cementoblastoma present before the age of 20 years and 75% present before 30 years. 6 They commonly involve the mandible and are seen in association with the apex of the premolar or molars. Cementoblastomas are commonly associated with an erupted permanent tooth; however, they can be seen with an unerupted or impacted tooth. Imaging shows a round, periapical, sclerotic, sharply marginated sunburst mass attached to the root of the tooth with a low-attenuation thin radiolucent halo. 6 9 It resembles osteoblastoma histologically; however, fusion of the tumor with the root of the tooth along with perpendicular orientation of the peripheral trabeculae to the capsule are characteristic features of cementoblastomas. 4
Odontomas
Odontomas are the most common odontogenic tumors seen in children, and represent a developmental aberration (hamartoma). 6 9 Approximately 50% are associated with an impacted tooth, although they may develop after tooth eruption. 9 Odontomas develop between the roots of the teeth and are classified as compound and complex types. Compound odontoma commonly occurs in the anterior maxilla and comprises multiple small radiographically identifiable tooth components (abortive teeth or denticles). Complex odontomas are seen as well-demarcated amorphous hyperattenuating conglomerate mass of enamel and dentin surrounding the crown of the tooth. 2 4 6 Complex odontomas are commonly located in the molar regions of the jaws and are surrounded by a low-attenuation halo, a feature that allows differentiation from osteoma ( Fig. 7 ). 6 Histologically, odontomas contain a mixture of acellular dentin containing tubules and enamel matrix. 4
Mixed-Density Lesions
Calcifying Epithelial Odontogenic Tumor (Pindborg’s Tumor)
Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor is a benign but locally aggressive tumor, uncommon in children. Typical location is in the premolar or the molar region of the mandible and most tumors are associated with the crown of an impacted tooth. CT shows radiolucent lesion with scattered calcified components and may show the impacted tooth within. 1 9 Histologically, it is an epithelial tumor with fibrous stroma and extracellular amyloid protein having a tendency to calcify. 4 9
Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma
Cemento-ossifying fibromas have been classified under odontogenic tumors in the latest 2017 WHO classification of odontogenic cysts and tumors, separate from juvenile ossifying fibromas (JOFs). These are benign mesenchymal odontogenic tumors arising within the periodontal ligament. The tumor comprises cellular fibroblastic stroma with varying amounts of bony trabeculae and cementumlike spherules. 4 11 Cemento-ossifying fibromas become more radiopaque as they mature and appearance may resemble fibrous dysplasia. However, as against fibrous dysplasia, these lesions are well demarcated, and often encapsulated. 13
Nonodontogenic Lesions
Nonodontogenic lesions usually have no specific relationship to dentition, can involve the bone around two or more teeth, and are seen below the inferior alveolar canal. Table 2 shows the lists of nonodontogenic cysts and tumors of the jaw in children.
Table 2. Nonodontogenic cysts and tumors of jaw in children.
Nonodontogenic cysts |
---|
Solitary bone cyst |
Aneurysmal bone cyst |
Stafne’s bone cyst |
Nonodontogenic tumors |
Benign mesenchymal tumors |
Giant cell lesions: giant cell tumor, central giant cell granulomas, brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism, cherubism |
Fibro-osseous lesions: juvenile ossifying fibroma, fibrous dysplasia, cemento-osseous dysplasia |
Bone and cartilage tumors: osteoma, osteochondroma, desmoplastic fibroma |
Malignant mesenchymal tumors: Ewing’s sarcoma, osteosarcoma |
Vascular tumors: intraosseous hemangioma, vascular malformations |
Hematopoietic and reticuloendothelial tumors: Burkitt’s lymphoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis |
Neurogenic tumors: neuroblastoma |
Radiolucent Lesions
Simple (Solitary/Unicameral) Bone Cyst
Simple bone cyst is usually an incidentally detected pseudocyst that arises due to posttraumatic intramedullary hemorrhage. 3 10 Common age of presentation is 10 to 20 years with typical location in the marrow of the posterior mandible. 3 On OPG, it appears as a unilocular low-density lesion with well-defined borders causing minimal bone expansion and a scalloped appearance of the superior margin of cyst between the tooth roots. 2 3 10 No associated root resorption or tooth displacement is seen as this pseudocyst insinuates between teeth. CT and MRI provide information on the hemorrhagic content in the lesion and no postcontrast enhancement is seen. 3
Aneurysmal Bone Cyst
ABC is an uncommon benign cystic jaw lesion with a spongelike appearance due to multiple blood-filled cavities. It can be locally aggressive due to its rapid growth and osteolytic tendency. 14 ABC is usually seen in patients younger than 20 years and more common in female, with the posterior mandible as the most common location. 2 14 Common presentation is a painless (or dull pain) rapidly growing swelling, which can be disfiguring. Imaging shows a unilocular or multilocular expansile lytic lesion with a honeycomb or soap bubble appearance, causing expansion, ballooning, and destruction of the cortex and tooth displacement or root resorption. On CT, ABC shows a typical meshwork appearance that reflects partially cystic, blood-filled meshwork divided by the coarse septa 10 14 15 ( Fig. 8 ). Contrast-enhanced images show enhancement of cyst wall and septa. Fluid-fluid levels (due to hemorrhage) on CT and MRI provide diagnostic confirmation. MRI helps differentiate ABC from odontogenic myxoma, CGCGs, OKC, and hemangioma. 10
Central Giant Cell Granuloma
CGCG is a benign non-neoplastic, occasionally aggressive intraosseous proliferative lesion predominantly affecting females in second and third decades of life. 3 16 Typical locations are the anterior maxilla and the mandible. On CT, it appears as a multilocular (less often unilocular) well-defined radiolucent lesion with thin internal septations (honeycomb appearance), usually in the anterior location and crosses the midline ( Fig. 9 ). 3 7 13 Tendency to resorb the roots of the adjacent teeth is an important diagnostic clue. 2 Histologically, it shows presence of fibrous tissue, hemorrhage, and characteristic osteoclastlike giant cells. 16 CGCG closely resembles brown tumors of hyperparathyroidism on imaging as well as pathology; however, multifocal involvement and biochemical profile in hyperparathyroidism help in differentiation. 7 13 16
Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare benign disorder of reticuloendothelial system with pathologic proliferation of mononuclear histiocytic cells, the Langerhans cells resulting in local tissue infiltration and destruction. Eosinophilic granuloma is the most benign and localized form of LCH, generally seen in children younger than 15 years (males > females). 3 Bones commonly involved are skull, flat bones, spine, and long bones. Oral manifestations like inflammatory gingival hypertrophy or tooth loosening may be the first signs of LCH, and involvement of the jaw is seen in 7.9% with typical location in the body and angle of the mandible. 17 Imaging shows a well-marginated, localized, punched-out or scooped-out lytic lesion with or without reactive sclerosis ( Fig. 10 ). 17 18 19 Destruction of the alveolar bone and loss of lamina dura result in a characteristic “floating tooth” appearance. 3 17
Ewing’s Sarcoma
Ewing’s sarcoma is the most aggressive primary malignant bone tumor in children that arises from undifferentiated osseous mesenchymal cells. Out of 4% Ewing’s sarcoma in the head and neck, 1% occur in the jaw with a predilection for the ramus of mandible (90% primary lesion). 20 21 Ewing’s sarcoma is commonly seen in first two decades of life with male preponderance. 21 Usual presentation is painful rapidly progressing swelling, loose teeth and nonspecific systemic symptoms. Histologically, it is a small round cell tumor with CD99 and MIC2 positive. 20 OPG shows an ill-defined permeative osteolytic lesion; it may also show cortical destruction, root resorption, and displacement of teeth. CT additionally shows the extent and pattern of bone destruction, floating teeth appearance, associated enhancing soft-tissue mass, and typical sunray–type periosteal reaction ( Fig. 11 ). 18 21 22 23 Characteristic onion peel–type periosteal reaction of Ewing’s sarcoma as seen elsewhere in the body is not seen because of typical flat bone with less mass of the mandible. 22 23 Imaging differentials may include osteomyelitis and neuroblastoma metastases. 20 21
Burkitt’s Lymphoma
An aggressive form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma is the least common type of lymphoma in all age groups. It is one of the fastest growing human malignancies with a doubling time of 24 to 48 hours; however, it is completely curable and highly sensitive to chemotherapy. 24 Three clinical subtypes are seen: the endemic variant, sporadic variant, and immunodeficiency-associated Burkitt’s lymphoma. Jaw and other facial bone involvement is more common in the endemic variant (associated with Epstein–Barr virus [EBV] infection), seen in Africa in malaria-endemic areas. The sporadic variant is associated with EBV infection in 30% of cases. It usually involves Waldeyer’s ring, lymph nodes, and the abdomen; however, it can rarely involve the jaw bones. 24 25 On CT, Burkitt’s lymphoma is seen as a soft-tissue mass with massive bone destruction around the jaw causing loosening or displacement of teeth due to loss of lamina dura and cortical disruption ( Fig. 12 ). MRI helps in assessment of marrow infiltration and submucosal extension of tumor. 18 24 25 Differential diagnosis may include metastasis neuroblastoma and leukemia. Biopsy is mandatory for correct diagnosis before starting treatment. 3
Radiopaque Lesions
Exostoses
Exostoses or tori are generally asymptomatic slow-growing benign localized bony outgrowths on the surface of the mandible or the maxilla. These are covered by a thin layer of poorly vascularized mucosa and show spontaneous arrest of growth. Exostoses are rarely seen in children and show four subtypes depending upon the site of origin. Torus mandibularis arises above the mylohyoid line, along the lingual surface of the mandible; buccal exostosis arises from the buccal cortex of the maxilla; torus palatinus arises midline on the hard palate; and torus maxillaris arises from the lingual surface of the posterior maxilla. 6 7 13
Osteoma
Osteoma is a benign bone tumor composed of mature compact or cancellous bone, commonly arising in craniofacial bones. It is uncommon in children, and the posterior mandibular body or condyle is the usual location. 6 On imaging, it appears as a well-circumscribed sclerotic mass with no perilesional halo and causes mild bone expansion. Multiple osteomas may be associated with Gardner’s syndrome. 6 7
Mixed-Density Lesions
Juvenile Ossifying Fibroma
JOF is an uncommon, fibro-osseous lesion with aggressive behavior and tendency to recur. Histologically, two variants are seen, the psammomatoid and trabecular JOFs. Psammomatoid subtypes are more common in adults with the orbit and the paranasal sinuses being the predominant locations. The trabecular subtype more commonly occurs in the jaw, and shows a high tendency to recur. 11 18 26 The trabecular JOF is typically seen in boys younger than 15 years. CT shows a solitary expansile well-defined lesion with ground-glass attenuation, varying degree of calcification, thin sclerotic border, and no low-attenuation halo ( Fig. 13 ). Developing tooth can be displaced, missing, or remain unerupted. 1 6 18 Histologically, it is similar to cement-ossifying fibroma comprising of cellular fibrous stroma, bony strands, and cement particles (4,26).
Fibrous Dysplasia
Fibrous dysplasia is an idiopathic developmental dysplastic disorder, where medullary bone is replaced by fibro-osseous tissue. It usually presents in childhood or in the early adolescence period with predominant involvement of the maxilla. 2 27 It can be monostotic (70%) or polyostotic (30%) and shows a heterogeneous ground-glass attenuation (homogenous in more mature forms). The characteristic features are bony expansion along the longitudinal axis of the affected bone, cortical thickening or thinning with intact cortex, and osseous deformity with no periosteal reaction ( Fig. 14 ). 2 6 Important diagnostic clues that help in differentiation of fibrous dysplasia from ossifying fibroma are ill-defined lesions, wide transition zone, longitudinal growth pattern, nondisplacement of the teeth, and crossing of sutures. In addition, fibrous dysplasia does not show osteoblastic rimming seen in ossifying fibroma on pathology. 6
Cherubism
Cherubism is a rare, inherited developmental disorder with clinical and radiographic similarity to craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. However, it shows a tendency toward spontaneous remission and is a separate entity on histopathology and genetic analysis. Typical presentation is a bilateral relatively symmetrical painless expansion of the jaw with a predilection for ramus of the mandible or tuberosity of maxilla, and pathognomonic sparing of the mandibular condyle. 2 Bone expansion starts in early childhood and grows progressively until puberty and shows gradual resolution thereafter. On imaging, variable-sized multilocular lucent areas with expansile bone remodeling, thinning of cortices, internal bony trabeculations, and dental derangement are seen. These lesions do not show periosteal reaction or associated soft tissue ( Fig. 15 ). Cherubism with its characteristic imaging appearance rarely needs biopsy for diagnosis; however, pathology shows multinucleated giant cells in fibrous connective tissue stroma. 2 7 28
Intraosseous/Central Hemangioma
Central hemangioma is a benign vascular tumor composed of disorganized masses of endothelial-lined spaces filled with blood. Common locations are in the vertebrae and skull with rare involvement of the jaw, usually involving the molar region of the mandible. 23 It is usually seen in the second decade of life and has a nonspecific imaging appearance. OPG may show a lesion with ground-glass attenuation. CT shows a well-defined expansile, multilocular lesion with small radiolucent locules separated by coarse bony trabeculae giving a honeycomb and soap bubble appearance ( Fig. 16 ). 2 23 29 Displacement of adjacent teeth and resorption of tooth roots are often seen. 29 Contrast-enhanced CT shows marked enhancement of the lesion that helps in differentiation from other multilocular radiolucent lesions like ABC, central giant cell reparative granuloma, and odontogenic myxoma. 23 29
Osteomyelitis of Jaw
Rare involvement of the jaw (1–6%) by osteomyelitis is attributed to paucity of cancellous bone; however, the mandible (alveolar and angle region) is involved more than the maxilla because of its rich blood supply. 6 30 It is usually seen in children younger than 16 years (60% cases). 31 Modes of infection may be (1) direct extension from pulpal infection in carious tooth, an extraction wound, or perforation of an erupting tooth; (2) regional extension of soft-tissue lesion to involve the underlying bone; and (3) hematogenous route. 31 Acute forms (usually bacterial origin) are diagnosed clinically, shows response to antibiotic treatment, and can result in chronic osteomyelitis if inadequately treated. However, chronic forms of osteomyelitis can also occur due to long-term low-grade infection like tuberculosis, which may remain clinically silent. 2 3 Cross-sectional imaging is needed to define extent and severity of lesion and to identify soft-tissue extension or associated abscesses. On imaging, acute osteomyelitis shows an ill-defined area of osteolysis with periosteal reaction and associated soft-tissue changes like cellulitis, myositis, and abscess. 2 Chronic osteomyelitis appears as mixed lytic–sclerotic or lytic destructive lesion having ill-defined borders with blurring of trabecular details. Periosteal new bone formation, sequestrum, associated enhancing soft tissue, and fistula with discharging sinus may be seen ( Fig. 17 ). 2 30 31 MRI is more sensitive in detecting bone marrow and soft-tissue involvement. 3
Osteosarcoma
Osteosarcoma, a highly malignant bone tumor, is rare in jaw comprising less than 10% of all osteosarcomas. 22 Although osteosarcoma commonly affects the long bones in the second decade of life, occurrence in jaw bones is usually seen in 30- to 40-year patients. 22 32 The posterior mandible is the most common site of involvement, and symmetrical widening of the periodontal membrane may be the earliest radiographic finding of osteosarcoma. Low-grade osteosarcoma shows lytic destruction with ill-defined margins, whereas in the osteoblastic form (common in the jaw), a sclerotic bone lesion with radiating mineralized tumor spicules, sunburst appearance, and small amount of associated soft tissue may be seen. 7 22
Secondary Involvement of the Jaw
Metastasis to the Jaw
Involvement of the mandible is more common than involvement of the maxilla in metastatic diseases with the propensity for angle and posterior body due to increased marrow space and vascularity. 9 Common malignancies that metastasize to the jaw in children are neuroblastoma, leukemia, lymphoma, and Ewing’s sarcoma. 18 Involvement of leukemia may present with loosening of teeth due to loss of lamina dura, and lytic bone destruction may be seen later. 13 On CT, neuroblastoma metastases are seen as ill-defined lytic lesions with a moth-eaten appearance ( Fig. 18 ) and sun ray–type periosteal reaction. 18 33
Direct Neoplastic Extension
Locally aggressive soft-tissue tumors in the vicinity of the jaw may involve the maxilla and the mandible and osseous destruction. This is seen as an ill-defined geographic, moth-eaten, or permeative bone destruction adjacent to soft-tissue tumor. 12 These tumors may include rhabdomyosarcoma, salivary gland tumors, and hemangiopericytoma in the pediatric population ( Fig. 19 ).
Association of Jaw Lesions with Other Diseases
Brown tumors of Hyperparathyroidism
Brown tumors are non-neoplastic, reactive focal bony lesions due to bone remodeling caused by long-standing hyperparathyroidism. They are more common in females and usually involve the ribs, clavicle, and pelvic girdle; they are rarely seen in the maxillofacial region (involvement of mandible commoner than maxilla). 34 They appear as focal lesions with both osteoclastic and osteoblastic activities causing bone resorption with fibrous replacement of the marrow and thinning of the cortex. CT shows multifocal variable-sized well-defined lytic lesions that may produce cortical expansion ( Fig. 20 ). In addition, bone changes due to hyperparathyroidism, for instance, generalized demineralization of jaw bones and loss of lamina dura, may also be seen. Biochemical parameters along with ultrasonography (USG) of the parathyroid gland help in achieving the correct diagnosis. 34 35 36
Jaw involvement in Tuberous Sclerosis
The jaw lesions associated with tuberous sclerosis may include gingival fibroma, angiofibroma, odontogenic myxoma, desmoplastic fibroma, calcified odontogenic tumor, and intraosseous hemangioma. 37 Desmoplastic fibroma is a rare, locally aggressive bone tumor of myofibroblastic origin that represents the intraosseous counterpart of the soft-tissue desmoids tumor or fibromatosis. 23 37 It usually involves the mandible, tibia, scapula, and femur, and is commonly seen in childhood and adolescence with female preponderance. 37 38 On CT, it appears as an expansile unilocular or multilocular lytic lesion with narrow transition zone, no matrix mineralization, marked cortical thinning, and often delayed enhancing soft tissue representing the fibrous nature of the lesion. Tumor extension into the surrounding soft tissues indicates a locally aggressive behavior. Desmoplastic fibroma has a high recurrence rate even after local resection and needs differentiation from other lytic lesions. 23 37 38 39
Myxofibrosarcoma
Myxofibrosarcoma is a myxoid variant of malignant fibrous histiocytoma having greater than 50% myxoid component (as per WHO 2013 classification) with a diffusely infiltrative pattern, and a high chance of local recurrence. It is rarely seen in children with uncommon involvement of the head and neck regions (3%). 40 Clinical presentation is a painless enlarging soft-tissue mass in the jaw. CT shows a hypoattenuating lesion and MRI is superior to CT for evaluation of tumor composition ( Figs. 21 and 22 ). Tumor shows low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and mixed intensity on T2 weighted images (hypointense fibrous tissue with hyperintense myxoid component) with the enhancement of the solid soft-tissue component. 40 Imaging features in favor of sarcomatous changes are size greater than 5 cm, heterogeneous T1 and T2 signal intensity, and high T2 signal intensity of edematous surrounding tissues. 41
Conclusion
Many jaw lesions, whether in a child or adult, have similar imaging appearance, and achieving a definitive diagnosis on imaging is a big challenge. A systematic approach to the evaluation of a child is required taking into consideration the age, gender, and clinical presentation along with the imaging features. While interpreting the imaging characteristics, attention must be given to the anatomical location and the relation of the lesion with the tooth and the inferior alveolar canal. It may not always be possible to reach a specific diagnosis; however, with a systematic evaluation, the list of differential diagnosis becomes narrow and more relevant.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Professor (Dr.) Sapna Singh, MD Radiodiagnosis, for her contribution to images of Figs. 14 and 15 .
Footnotes
Conflict of InterestFinancial Support and Sponsorship There are no conflicts of interest.
Nil.
References
- 1.Akay M C, Zeytinoğlu M, Simşek B, Aras I. Multidisciplinary management of benign jaw tumors in children. In: Motamedi MH, ed. A Textbook of Advanced Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol. 2. London: IntechOpen. 2015:273–304. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gadodia A, Seith A, Sharma R, Choudhury A R, Bhutia O, Gupta A. Multidetector computed tomography of jaw lesions in children and adolescents. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010;54(02):111–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Avril L, Lombardi T, Ailianou A et al. Radiolucent lesions of the mandible: a pattern-based approach to diagnosis. Insights Imaging. 2014;5(01):85–101. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0298-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Soluk-Tekkeşin M, Wright J M. The World health organization classification of odontogenic lesions: a summary of the changes of the 2017 (4th) edition. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2018:34. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2017.01410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.El-Naggar A K, Chan J KC, Grandis J R, Takata T, Slootweg P. Odontogenic and maxilofacial bone tumours. In: El-Naggar AK, ed. WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC. 2017:205–260. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Curé J K, Vattoth S, Shah R. Radiopaque jaw lesions: an approach to the differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2012;32(07):1909–1925. doi: 10.1148/rg.327125003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Neyaz Z, Gadodia A, Gamanagatti S, Mukhopadhyay S. Radiographical approach to jaw lesions. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(02):165–176, quiz 177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kalkur C, Halim N, Sattur A, Burde K, Naikmasur V. Radiographical approach to multilocular radiolucent lesions of the jaws: a review. EC Dent Sci. 2019;18:410–420. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dunfee B L, Sakai O, Pistey R, Gohel A. Radiologic and pathologic characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of the mandible. Radiographics. 2006;26(06):1751–1768. doi: 10.1148/rg.266055189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Devenney-Cakir B, Subramaniam R M, Reddy S M, Imsande H, Gohel A, Sakai O. Cystic and cystic-appearing lesions of the mandible: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196 06:WS66–WS77. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.7216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Speight P M, Takata T. New tumour entities in the 4th edition of the World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumours: odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumours. Virchows Arch. 2018;472:331–339. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2182-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bernaerts A, Vanhoenacker F M, Hintjens J et al. Tumors and tumor-like lesions of the jaw: radiolucent lesions. JBR-BTR. 2006;89(02):81–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Harmon M, Arrigan M, Toner M, O’Keeffe S A. A radiological approach to benign and malignant lesions of the mandible. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(04):335–350. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.López-Arcas Calleja J M, Cebrián Carretero J L, González Martín J, Burgueño M. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the mandible: case presentation and review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12(05):E401–E403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shete A, Chavan M, Diwan N, Shete M. Aneurysmal bone cyst: rarity in mandible and its ambiguity with central giant cell granuloma. J Orofac Sci. 2012;4:51–55. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nackos J S, Wiggins R H, III, Harnsberger H R. CT and MR imaging of giant cell granuloma of the craniofacial bones. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(08):1651–1653. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Can I H, Kurt A, Ozer E, Sarı N, Samim E. Mandibular manifestation of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children. Oral Oncol Extra. 2005;41:174–177. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Becker M, Stefanelli S, Rougemont A L, Poletti P A, Merlini L. Non-odontogenic tumors of the facial bones in children and adolescents: role of multiparametric imaging. Neuroradiology. 2017;59(04):327–342. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1798-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Golai S, Nimbeni B, Patil S D, Kakanur M, Paul S. Langerhans histiocytosis in a child - diagnosed by oral manifestations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(04):ZD09–ZD11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12353.5786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Krishna K B, Thomas V, Kattoor J, Kusumakumari P. A radiological review of Ewing’s sarcoma of mandible: a case report with one year follow-up. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;6(02):109–114. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lopes S L, Almeida S M, Costa A L, Zanardi V A, Cendes F. Imaging findings of Ewing’s sarcoma in the mandible. J Oral Sci. 2007;49(02):167–171. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.49.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weber A L, Bui C, Kaneda T. Malignant tumors of the mandible and maxilla. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2003;13(03):509–524. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5149(03)00042-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Theodorou D J, Theodorou S J, Sartoris D J. Primary non-odontogenic tumors of the jawbones: an overview of essential radiographic findings. Clin Imaging. 2003;27(01):59–70. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00518-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Derinkuyu B E, Boyunağa Ö, Öztunalı Ç et al. Imaging features of Burkitt lymphoma in pediatric patients. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22(01):95–100. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.15211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kalisz K, Alessandrino F, Beck R et al. An update on Burkitt lymphoma: a review of pathogenesis and multimodality imaging assessment of disease presentation, treatment response, and recurrence. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(01):56. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0733-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Keles B, Duran M, Uyar Y, Azimov A, Demirkan A, Esen H H. Juvenile ossifying fibroma of the mandible: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010;1(02):e5. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2010.1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.MacDonald-Jankowski D S. Fibro-osseous lesions of the face and jaws. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(01):11–25. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2003.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Beaman F D, Bancroft L W, Peterson J J, Kransdorf M J, Murphey M D, Menke D M. Imaging characteristics of cherubism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(04):1051–1054. doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.4.1821051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mittal A, Sheikh S A, Vinod V C, Garg P. Images: central hemangioma of the maxilla. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2007;17:163–165. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Koul P A, Khan U H, Jan R A, Shah T H, Bagdadi F, Shah S. Tubercular osteomyelitis of the mandible in a young female. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2014;3(02):155–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gupta K B, Manchanda M, Yadav S P, Mittal A. Tubercular osteomyelitis of mandible. Indian J Tuberc. 2005;52:147–150. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang S, Shi H, Yu Q. Osteosarcoma of the jaws: demographic and CT imaging features. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(01):37–42. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/86834844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wade G, Revels J, Hartman L, Brown W. Pediatric mandibular metastasis: a rare finding of neuroblastoma. Radiol Case Rep. 2017;13(01):289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2017.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Scarano A, Sinjari B, Artese L, Fanali S, Carinci F. Mandible brown tumor caused by primary hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Inflamm. 2011;9:101–104. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Scholl R J, Kellett H M, Neumann D P, Lurie A G. Cysts and cystic lesions of the mandible: clinical and radiologic-histopathologic review. Radiographics. 1999;19(05):1107–1124. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.5.g99se021107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xie C, Tsakok M, Taylor N, Partington K. Imaging of brown tumours: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(01):75. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0757-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tandon S, Garg R K. Intraoral desmoplastic fibroma: a manifestation of tuberous sclerosis. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2012;31(04):195–201. doi: 10.3109/15513815.2011.648719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fahmy M D, Gupta A, Padilla R J, Segura A, Brookes C D. Desmoplastic fibroma associated with tuberous sclerosis: case report and literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;128(02):e92–e99. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Konikoth S, Bose T, Anupama I V, Yogidas R. Desmoplastic fibroma of the mandible: a rare benign tumor mimicking malignancy. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2019;31:74–78. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Roland C L, Wang W L, Lazar A J, Torres K E. Myxofibrosarcoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016;25(04):775–788. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chhabra A, Soldatos T.Soft-tissue lesions: when can we exclude sarcoma?AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012199061345–1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]