Skip to main content
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
. 2020 Dec 24;15(4):475–477. doi: 10.1177/1559827620983762

An Innovative Tai Chi and Qigong Telehealth Service in Supportive Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

Byeongsang Oh 1,2,3,, Diana Van Der Saag 4, Morita Morgia 5,6, Susan Carroll 7,8,9, Frances Boyle 10,11, Michael Back 12,13,14, Gillian Lamoury 15,16,17
PMCID: PMC8299917  PMID: 34366746

Abstract

Supportive cancer care services, including acupuncture and Tai Chi and Qigong (TQ), are offered to cancer patients to manage cancer symptoms and/or treatment-related adverse effects and improve quality of life during and after standard care. Normal face-to-face acupuncture and TQ group services were suspended during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic to reduce the risk of transmission of infection and meet social distancing restriction guidelines. This led to a sudden shift from face-to-face sessions to telehealth sessions in the health care system. We report patients’ experiences of TQ telehealth services as a new initiative developed for cancer care. We found that delivery of TQ telehealth is feasible and resulted in increased overall patient satisfaction with cancer care services during the lockdown. The delivery of TQ telehealth experiences and challenges are discussed.

Keywords: Tai Chi, Qigong, telehealth, cancer, supportive care


TQ [Tai Chi and Qigong] combines gentle stretching exercises with meditation and is a classical mind-body exercise . . . [and] has been practiced as a health preserving activity for many centuries.

Several countries worldwide, including Australia, implemented lockdown during the outbreak of the novel coronavirus pandemic (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) in early 2020 that posed extremely difficult challenges for health care globally. 1 In March 2020, the Australian government introduced new telehealth services in the health care system to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. 2 In response to the pandemic and the government’s telehealth initiative, a Tai Chi and Qigong (TQ) program shifted from face-to-face group sessions to individualized telehealth sessions via ZOOM, FaceTime, and Skype, while face-to-face allied health services, including acupuncture, were suspended from March 23, 2020, to May 22, 2020, at GenesisCare (Private Cancer Centre, Mater Hospital in North Sydney, Australia). The GenesisCare Cancer Centre had introduced acupuncture and TQ services in 2018 as supportive care for cancer patients during and after cancer treatments.

Several studies have demonstrated that physical activity and meditation have positive impacts on the physical and psychological well-being of cancer patients and are recognized as essential adjunctive treatments to support usual cancer care.3,4 TQ combines gentle stretching exercises with meditation and is a classical mind-body exercise originating in China that has been practiced as a health preserving activity for many centuries. 5 Recently, a number of TQ studies have demonstrated the positive impact of TQ on physical conditions such as arthritis, 6 cancer, 7 diabetes, 8 falls prevention, 9 fibromyalgia, 10 osteoarthritis, 11 chronic pain, 6 and cognitive function. 12 Evidence also supports the psychological benefits of TQ, particularly for symptoms of anxiety and depression. 13 In the current health care crisis, with the sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, several TQ instructors and schools have attempted to promote TQ for well-being of the general public via online programs including ZOOM, FaceTime, YouTube, and Skype. 14 However, evaluation of TQ telehealth services in cancer care within hospital environments is limited at present. Here, we report our experience of delivering TQ telehealth in a cancer treatment center during a lockdown period in Sydney, Australia.

TQ Service via Telehealth

During the lockdown period, 12 patients (breast cancer [n = 11], gynecology cancer [n = 1]) were referred to the TQ program. Eleven patients joined the TQ program via telehealth and one patient did not respond to the referral by email. A total of 39 sessions were offered at the cancer center during the lockdown. Of the 11 patients who participated in the TQ telehealth program, 3 completed 2 sessions, 5 completed 3 sessions, and 3 completed more than 6 sessions.

Participants main symptoms were anxiety (n = 7), stress (n = 10), disturbed sleep (n = 5), fatigue (n = 5), peripheral neuropathy (n = 3), and joint pain and stiffness (n = 6). All participants had more than one medical symptom. After 2 to 6 sessions of TQ, participants reported that they felt relaxed, enjoyed the TQ telehealth sessions, and were satisfied with the services, which helped them better manage their cancer-related symptoms. After the lockdown was lifted, 2 patients continued with an ongoing TQ program via telehealth and the face-to-face group TQ program recommenced on 20 June with 2 to 3 patients. In July, a face-to-face TQ program was offered with a maximum of 5 participants enrolling and followed social distancing guidelines to prevent the risk of COVID-19 transmission. Prior to the pandemic, 3 to 15 participants attended a weekly Saturday face-to-face TQ group program.

Challenges in the Administration of TQ via Telehealth

In the beginning of the first week both TQ instructors and participants were not familiar with the telehealth ZOOM and Skype software programs. The FaceTime software program was easier and simpler to use, but a major barrier was using the software with the small screen of a mobile phone, as the movements on the small screen were not clear to instructors and participants. Delivering TQ telehealth via ZOOM and Skype was more comfortable and effective using a bigger screen on laptops/desktops after installing the software program. However, time-lag delays in movements and screen interference often occurred when an internet connection was not stable. To improve the delivery of TQ via telehealth, it will be necessary for both the TQ instructors and participants to trial the software programs and internet connections before commencing TQ telehealth and for both to become familiar with connection procedures. Providing internet technical (IT) services by an IT department will also be worthwhile, particularly as some elderly participants will likely have difficulty with new telehealth software programs.

Prior to the pandemic, most TQ instructors were concerned more about limitations of TQ via telehealth than its benefits with concerns expressed about its cost-effectiveness. TQ communities also expressed concern that telehealth was not an appropriate mode of delivery for TQ because of the complexity of TQ movements and safety-related aspects of remote delivery. The cost of the TQ telehealth service was reimbursed by the GenesisCare allied healthcare financial packages available to participants during the pandemic. After the lifting of the lockdown, limited funding was the main barrier for participants continuing with long-term TQ telehealth sessions and patients who received telehealth TQ services reported that they wanted to continue the program to help manage their medical conditions. At present, TQ services are not included in the Medicare benefits schedule or in private health insurance rebates in Australia. Future studies are planned to evaluate the delivery type and benefits of TQ services (face-to-face vs telehealth) in cancer care. Although public awareness of telehealth in allied health has increased as a result of the current pandemic, lessons learned from our experience suggests that guidelines on TQ telehealth training and education including referral pathways, safety concerns, documentation, patient’s privacy, and remuneration of costs must be developed to allow TQ telehealth programs to become an integral part of the health care system for other cancer care centres. 15

Conclusion

The COVID-19 lockdown and social distancing restrictions during the pandemic allowed an opportunity for the prompt commencement of telehealth services in health care. We found that the delivery of TQ services via telehealth was feasible and increased patient’s overall satisfaction with cancer care services and improved their quality of life. During this difficult period, the introduction of an innovative TQ telehealth program to maintain supportive cancer care services was welcomed by patients and a need to develop guidelines for TQ telehealth training and education for clinical applications in cancer care was identified as essential for the future development of telehealth services.

Footnotes

Author Contributions: BO, GL, and DS cooperated on developing the concept design and preparing the manuscript. Drafting of the manuscript: BO and GL. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: TQ telehealth service supported by the GenesisCare Allied Health Breast Fund.

Ethical Approval: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Informed Consent: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Trial Registration: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any clinical trials.

Contributor Information

Byeongsang Oh, GenesisCare, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Diana Van Der Saag, GenesisCare, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Morita Morgia, GenesisCare, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Susan Carroll, GenesisCare, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Frances Boyle, Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Michael Back, GenesisCare, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Gillian Lamoury, GenesisCare, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

References

  • 1.Bashshur R, Doarn CR, Frenk JM, Kvedar JC, Woolliscroft JO. Telemedicine and the COVID-19 pandemic, lessons for the future. Telemedicine J E Health. 2020;26:571-573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ministers Department of Health. COVID-19: Whole of Population Telehealth for Patients, General Practice, Primary Care and Other Medical Services. Ministers Department of Health; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carlson LE, Zelinski E, Toivonen K, et al. Mind-body therapies in cancer: what is the latest evidence? Curr Oncol Rep. 2017;19:67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Greenlee H, DuPont-Reyes MJ, Balneaves LG, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:194-232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guo Y, Qiu P, Liu T. Tai Ji Quan: an overview of its history, health benefits, and cultural value. J Sport Health Sci. 2014;3:3-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kong LJ, Lauche R, Klose P, et al. Tai Chi for chronic pain conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wayne PM, Lee MS, Novakowski J, et al. Tai Chi and Qigong for cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2018;12:256-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhou Z, Zhou R, Li K, et al. Effects of tai chi on physiology, balance and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51:405-417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu HH, Yeh NC, Wu YF, Yang YR, Wang RY, Cheng FY. Effects of Tai Chi exercise on reducing falls and improving balance performance in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Parkinsons Dis. 2019;2019:9626934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng CA, Chiu YW, Wu D, Kuan YC, Chen SN, Tam KW. Effectiveness of Tai Chi on fibromyalgia patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2019;46:1-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:220-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang J, Zhang L, Tang Q, et al. Tai Chi is effective in delaying cognitive decline in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:3620534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.So WWY, Cai S, Yau SY, Tsang HWH. The neurophysiological and psychological mechanisms of qigong as a treatment for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.NSW State Government. Active and Healthy. Tai chi and Qi Gong. Published 2020. Accessed July 10, 2020. https://www.activeandhealthy.nsw.gov.au/program/view/2450 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sanders JH, Bashshur RL. Challenges to the implementation of telemedicine. Telemed J. 1995;1:115-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES