Skip to main content
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine logoLink to Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
. 2021 Jul 23;18(4):479–484. doi: 10.1007/s13770-021-00365-w

Extracellular Vesicles in Regenerative Medicine: Potentials and Challenges

Ji Yong Lee 1, Han-Soo Kim 2,
PMCID: PMC8300067  PMID: 34297340

Abstract

The ultimate goal of regenerative medicine is to regain or restore the damaged or lost function of tissues and organs. Several therapeutic strategies are currently being explored to achieve this goal. From the point of view of regenerative medicine, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are exceptionally attractive due to the fact that they can overcome the limitations faced by many cell therapies and can be engineered according to their purpose through various technical modifications. EVs are biological nanoscale vesicles naturally secreted by all forms of living organisms, including prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and act as vehicles of communication between cells and their surrounding environment. Over the past decade, EVs have emerged as a new therapeutic agent for various diseases and conditions owing to their multifaceted biological functions. This is reflected by the number of publications on this subject found in the Web of Science database, which currently exceeds 12,300, over 85% of which were published within the last decade, demonstrating the increasing global trends of this innovative field. The reviews collected in this special issue provide an overview of the different approaches being explored in the use of EVs for regenerative medicine.

Keywords: Clinial trials, Commercialization, Extracellular vesicles, Regenerative medicine


EVs, the ubiquitous particles once considered as an elimination apparatus for cellular waste [1]. have added an additional layer to the conventional modes of intercellular communication, including direct cellular contact via adhesion molecules and soluble mediators (hormones, growth factors, cytokines and chemicals). It has become evident that these membrane-enclosed nanoscale particles (40–1000 nm), secreted by donor cells, exchange biological information between cells and participate in a diverse array of physiological and pathological processes [2]. The composition of these subcellular particles includes growth factor receptors, ligands, adhesion proteins, mRNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), second messengers, metabolites, and lipids that reflect their cellular origin. The decorating proteins on the surface of EVs may serve as a type of postal code that delivers membrane-enclosed messages. In general, EVs are commonly divided into two major subgroups according to their size and biogenesis: microvesicles (MVs) and exosomes. MVs are 100–500 nm in diameter, are generated by budding off from the plasma membrane, and represent a subgroup of larger vesicles. Exosomes, which are much smaller vesicles with a diameter of approximately 40–150 nm, are formed by the reverse budding of endosomal multivesicular bodies and are secreted from cells upon the fusion of these bodies with the plasma membrane. It is difficult to obtain pure vesicle fractions of microvesicles and exosomes because of the size, density, and protein marker overlaps between microvesicles and exosomes. Due to the methodological difficulties associated with distinguishing these sub-groups, it has also been proposed to substitute the term “extracellular vesicles (EVs)” in accordance with ISEV 2018 guidelines [3].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can be applied in regeneration, and have a long history of extensive basic research and beneficial results in clinical trials. Many preclinical studies have reported paracrine factors as key therapeutic agents for MSC-based cell therapies [4]. Among these paracrine factors, the therapeutic roles of EVs in regenerative medicine have been elucidated by studies utilizing animal disease models of kidney, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological diseases and hair loss [510]. A recent study showed that MSCs-EVs ameliorated LPS-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in a mouse model, indicating their utility in the control of the inflammatory response and fibrotic events following Covid-19 infection [11]. In addition to MSCs, embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, tissue-specific stem cells, progenitor cells derived from stem cells, and even terminally differentiated cells may also be successfully used in tissue regeneration as EV producers [1214].

Accumulating evidence of preclinical therapeutic efficacy and their versatility in tissue repair and regeneration has brought attention to EVs as a potential regenerative substance. Although recent studies have shown that the regulation of apoptosis, cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, aging, and inflammation are mainly attributed to the action of EVs [15], the molecular biological mechanisms involved in EV-mediated tissue repair and regeneration have not been fully elucidated. Studies have suggested that three molecular entities in the EV composition play key roles in EV-mediated tissue repair and regeneration processes: miRNAs, mRNAs, and proteins. To date, several specialized signaling pathways related to regenerative processes, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase, Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/Akt, Notch, TGF-β/Smad, STAT and Hedgehog signaling, CaMKII, and Efna3 signaling, have been identified upon EV stimulation [1619]. EVs can deliver key proteins directly or control their upstream or downstream components by regulating gene expression with mRNAs or miRNAs [20], a subtype of small (19–24 nucleotides), non-coding RNA molecules that target mainly mRNA molecules to regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Many studies have evaluated the miRNA cargo of EVs and proposed their regulatory roles in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis during tissue regeneration. Several miRNAs act as potential contenders for tissues and organ-specific tissue regeneration. For example, miR-124 and miR-9/9* induce the direct conversion of fibroblasts into neuron-like cells by modulating chromatin remodeling complex [21], and miR-1 and miR-133a protects the myocardium against apoptosis, oxidative stress, and fibrosis and promotes cardiac regeneration [22]. Furthermore, the immunomodulatory role of EVs has been demonstrated by miR-146a in BM-MSC-derived MVs in allogenic kidney transplantation [23].

mRNAs are another prime messenger in EVs in tissue regeneration. In particular, the horizontal transfer of mRNAs from donor cells to recipient cells is evident in studies utilizing MSC-derived EVs [18]. The therapeutic action of MSC-EV-delivered mRNAs related to Gene Ontology terms of immune regulation and damage repair to recipient cells have already been documented in several studies [24]. For example, Choi et al. [25] found that MSC-EVs containing mRNA of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) induced the proliferation of peritubular capillary endothelial cells in acute renal ischemic mice. Additionally, the horizontal transfer of neuregulin 1 mRNA in adipose stem cell (ASC)-derived EVs diminished muscle damage and inflammation in a mouse model of hind limb ischemia [26]. However, it should be noted that the regenerative effect observed in this study is not solely manifested by the horizontal transfer of mRNA species by EVs. Proteins in EVs are known to modulate the intracellular and extracellular microenvironment of recipient cells. Proteome studies of MSC-EVs have identified proteins associated with tissue repair and regeneration via angiogenesis, coagulation, apoptosis, inflammation, and extracellular matrix remodeling [27, 28].

The accumulation of knowledge regarding EVs using disease models has provided potential opportunities for their clinical applications in a variety of diseases [29, 30]. Based on their compact size, collection efficiency, biocompatibility, and engineered production, EVs have many advantages as a therapeutic delivery tool for regenerative medicine. However, several regulatory hurdles and technical challenges must be addressed for the successful clinical translation of these remarkable biological particles. These include defining therapeutically active sub-populations of EVs among heterogeneous vesicles, the optimization of the purification step, scale-up production, dosage, route of administration, safety of EVs (toxicity, immune response, and pharmacodynamics), regulation of complications, and quality management [31, 32]. Although several clinical trials of EVs are in progress, majority are focused on biomarkers, pathological mechanisms, and cancer treatment, and only a few studies have focused on tissue repair and regeneration. The EV clinical studies in the field of regenerative medicine that are ongoing are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Lists of clinical trials using EVs for tissue repair and regeneration

Target tissue Disease Intervention Trial purpose Trial phase Contry
Lung Bronchpulmonary Dysplasia BMMSC-EVs (UNEX-42) NCT03857841 Phase I USA
Pneumonia by COVID-19 MSC-CM NCT04798716 Phase I, Phase II USA
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ADMSC-EVs NCT04602104 Phase I, Phase II China
Pneumonia by COVID-19 ADMSC-Evs NCT04798716 Phase I USA
Pneumonia by COVID-19 COVID-19 Specific T cell-derived exosomes (CSTC-Exo) NCT04389385 Phase 1 Turkey
Bone and cartilage Osteoarthritis ADMSC-EVs NCT04314661 Phase I Indonesia
Low back pain PRP-EXSOME NCT04849429 Phase I India
Periodontitis ADMSC-EVs NCT04270006 Early Phase 1 Egypt
Muscle Muscular dystrophy Cardiosphere-derived Cells-Evs(CAP-1002) NCT03406780 Phase 2 USA
Brain Acute ischemic stroke MSC-EVs NCT03384433 Phase I, Phase II Iran
Alzheimer Disease MSC-EVs NCT04388982 Phase I and II China
Brain injury, Cognitive disorder M2 macrophage-derived bioactive factors Phase I and II
Craniofacial neuralgia Exosome NCT04202783 N.A USA
Cardiovascular Heart attack PEP (EV-based product) NCT04327635 Phase I USA
Aortic dissection (Multiple organ failure) MSC-EVs NCT04356300 N.A Fujian Medical University
Skin Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa MSC-EVs (AGLE 102) NCT04173650 Phase I/IIA N.C
Skin ulcer Plasma-derived EVs NCT02565264 Phase I Japan
Chronic ulcer Stem cell-conditioned media NCT04134676 Phase I Indonesia
Wound healing Platelet-EVs NCT02565264 Phase I Japan
Eye Macular holes MSC-EVs NCT03437759 Phase I China
Dry eyes UMSC-EVs NCT04213248 Phase I and II China
Pancreas Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 UMSC-EVs NCT02138331 Phase II and III Egypt
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma MSC-EVs loaded KrasG12D siRNA NCT03608631 Phase I USA

Information obtained from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ on 28 April 2021

BMMSC, bone marrow-drived mesenchymal stem cells; CM, conditioned medium; ADMSC, adipose tissue-derived MSC; PRP, platelet-rich plasma; PEP, purified exosome product; UMSC, umbilical mesenchymal stem cells

In just a few years, several biotech companies have developed EV-based therapeutic agents from different cell sources, and have attempted to enhance the therapeutic potential of EVs using various strategies, including technology related to enhanced isolation efficiency, characterization, large-scale production, and loading cargo with a combination of other biomaterials. Commercial EV-based products for tissue repair and regeneration of other organs in human clinical settings have already been developed and registered (Table 2). Although EVs have shown potential as a new biological therapeutic agent in the field of regenerative medicine, and their effectiveness has been verified through in vivo and in vitro studies, the mechanisms by which the biological components of EVs promote tissue repair and regeneration remain unknown. However, once the relative contributions of specific molecules become clear, researchers will be able to enhance the therapeutic potential of EVs via biochemical or genetic engineering for disease- and organ-specific repair and regeneration.

Table 2.

Lists of companies developing EV-products for regenerative medicine

Company EV-product Target Homepage
Codiak Biosciences (USA)

exoSTING™

exoIL-12™

exoASO™-STAT6

Cancer

Neuronal disease

https://www.codiakbio.com/
Evox Therapeutics (UK)

EVOX-101

EVOX-102

EVOX-103

Rare genetic disorder (Argininosuccinic aciduria, Citrullinemia type I, Phenylketonuria) https://www.evoxtherapeutics.com/
Capricor Therapeutics (USA)

CAP-2003

Engineered EVs

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

COVID-19

https://capricor.com/
Aegle Therapeutics (USA) AGLE-102

Epidermolysis bullosa

Burn

https://www.aegletherapeutics.com/index.html
ExoPharm (Australia) Engineered EVs

Genetic diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases

Viral infections

Cancer

https://exopharm.com/
ReNeuron (UK) CTX-derived Exosomes Drug delivery http://www.reneuron.com/
Anjarium Biosciences (Switzerland) Hybridosomes® (lipid synthetic particles + EVs)

Cancer

Rare genetic diseases

http://www.anjarium.com/
Innovex Therapeutics (Spain) Exosomes

Malaria

COVID-19

porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)

https://innovexther.com/
Carmine Therapeutics (USA) REGENT® Genetic diseases https://www.carminetherapeutics.com/
Evora Biosciences (France) EVOGEX Digestive fistula https://www.evorabio.com/
Vesigen Therapeutics (USA) Engineered ARMMs((ARRDC1)

Neurologic diseases

Ophthalmologic diseases

Cancer

https://www.vesigentx.com/programs/
Exogenus Therapeutics (Portugal) Exosomes

Skin diseases

Autoimmune diseases

Aruna Bio (Greece)

AB126 (exosomes)

AB127(siRNA)

AB128(protein)

AB129(mRNA)

Neurodegenerative diseases https://aruna-bio.webflow.io/
Organicell (USA)

Zofin

Pure X

Musculoskeletal diseases

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Cardiac diseases

Autoimmune diseases

Neurologic diseases

COVID-19

https://organicell.com/
MDimune (South Korea) BioDrone®

Osteoarthritis

COPD

Neurodegenerative diseases

http://www.mdimune.com/
ILIAS Biologics (South Korea)

EXPLOR™

Exo-Target®

Inflammatory diseases

Metabolic genetic diseases

(Gaucher’s Disease; GD2 and 3)

http://iliasbio.com/
OmniSpirant (Ireland) Exosomes

Cystic fibrosis

COPD

https://www.omnispirant.com/
NeurExo (USA)

NXS-1001

NXS-1002

NXS-1003

Stroke

Mild Traumatic brain injury (TBI)

Mild to Moderate TBI

http://nxs.hartzcreative.com/
Creative Medical Technology Holdings (USA) ImmCelz® Stroke https://creativemedicaltechnology.com/
Infusio (Germany) Exosomes

Lyme disease

Chronic inflammation

Autoimmune diseases

Chronic degenerative diseases

Anti-aging therapies

https://www.infusio.org/
Exocel Bio (USA) Exovex Cellular rejuvenation https://www.exocelbio.com/
ExoCoBio (South Korea)

ExoSCRT

ExoBRID-E and Vexosome EVs+ 

ASCE + ™

: Exomage

Celltweet

Skin diseases

Cellular rejuvenation

http://www.exomage.co.kr/index
Versatope Therapeutics (USA) Recombinant Outer Membrane Vesicles

Allergy

Vaccine development

Infectious diseases

https://www.versatope.com/
PureTech Health (USA) Orasome™

Rheumatoid arthritis,

Diabetes,

Autoimmune diseases cancer

https://www.puretechhealth.com/

The special issue “Current progress in extracellular vesicles in stem cells and tissue regeneration” was enthusiastically released by the Editorial Board of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine to identify unresolved issues and report on cutting-edge developments in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. As reviewed in this special issue, advances in the isolation and characterization of EVs, along with their intrinsic capacity, clearly opens new avenues for tissue repair and regeneration in humans. We would like to thank all of the contributing authors of the papers collected in this special issue and hope that the readers will both enjoy and be inspired by this emerging and state-of-the-art research topic.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIP), No. NRF-2017M3A9B4042583.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical statement

Ethical approval and consent to participate is not applicable to this article as no data were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Rashed MH, Bayraktar E, Helal GK, Abd-Ellah MF, Amero P, Chavez-Reyes A, et al. Exosomes: from garbage bins to promising therapeutic targets. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:538. doi: 10.3390/ijms18030538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gurung S, Perocheau D, Touramanidou L, Baruteau J. The exosome journey: from biogenesis to uptake and intracellular signalling. Cell Commun Signal. 2021;19:47. doi: 10.1186/s12964-021-00730-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Witwer KW, Théry C. Extracellular vesicles or exosomes? On primacy, precision, and popularity influencing a choice of nomenclature. J Extracell Vesicles. 2019;8:1648167. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2019.1648167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhuang WZ, Lin YH, Su LJ, Wu MS, Jeng HY, Chang HC, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-based therapy: mechanism, systemic safety and biodistribution for precision clinical applications. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28:28. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00725-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee JY, Kim E, Choi SM, Kim DW, Kim KP, Lee I, et al. Microvesicles from brain-extract-treated mesenchymal stem cells improve neurological functions in a rat model of ischemic stroke. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33038. doi: 10.1038/srep33038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bang OY, Kim EH. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle therapy for stroke: challenges and progress. Front Neurol. 2019;10:211. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zilberman-Itskovich S, Efrati S. Mesenchymal stromal cell uses for acute kidney injury-current available data and future perspectives: a mini-review. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1369. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Abreu RC, Fernandes H, da Costa Martins PA, Sahoo S, Emanueli C, Ferreira L. Native and bioengineered extracellular vesicles for cardiovascular therapeutics. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:685–697. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0389-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Teli P, Kale V, Vaidya A. Extracellular vesicles isolated from mesenchymal stromal cells primed with neurotrophic factors and signaling modifiers as potential therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Res Transl Med. 2021;69:103286. doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2021.103286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nilforoushzadeh MA, Aghdami N, Taghiabadi E. Human hair outer root sheath cells and platelet-lysis exosomes promote hair inductivity of dermal papilla cell. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2020;17:525–536. doi: 10.1007/s13770-020-00266-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kaspi H, Semo J, Abramov N, Dekel C, Lindborg S, Kern R, et al. MSC-NTF (NurOwn®) exosomes: a novel therapeutic modality in the mouse LPS-induced ARDS model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12:72. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02143-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nair R, Santos L, Awasthi S, von Erlach T, Chow LW, Bertazzo S, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from preosteoblasts influence embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:1625–1635. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El Harane N, Kervadec A, Bellamy V, Pidial L, Neametalla HJ, Perier MC, et al. Acellular therapeutic approach for heart failure: in vitro production of extracellular vesicles from human cardiovascular progenitors. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:1835–1847. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stronati E, Conti R, Cacci E, Cardarelli S, Biagioni S, Poiana G. Extracellular vesicle-induced differentiation of neural stem progenitor cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3691. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ko KW, Yoo YI, Kim JY, Choi B, Park SB, Park W, et al. Attenuation of tumor necrosis factor-α induced inflammation by umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cell derived exosome-mimetic nanovesicles in endothelial cells. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2020;17:155–163. doi: 10.1007/s13770-019-00234-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lombardo G, Gili M, Grange C, Cavallari C, Dentelli P, Togliatto G, et al. IL-3R-alpha blockade inhibits tumor endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicle (EV)-mediated vessel formation by targeting the β-catenin pathway. Oncogene. 2018;37:1175–1191. doi: 10.1038/s41388-017-0034-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Adamo A, Brandi J, Caligola S, Delfino P, Bazzoni R, Carusone R, et al. Extracellular vesicles mediate mesenchymal stromal cell-dependent regulation of B cell PI3K-AKT signaling pathway and atin cytoskeleton. Front Immunol. 2019;10:446. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maggio S, Ceccaroli P, Polidori E, Cioccoloni A, Stocchi V, Guescini M. Signal exchange through extracellular vesicles in neuromuscular junction establishment and maintenance. From physiology to pathology. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2084. doi: 10.3390/ijms20112804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Han M, Cao Y, Xue H, Chu X, Li T, Xin D, et al. Neuroprotective effect of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion-induced neural functional injury: a pivotal role for AMPK and JAK2/STAT3/NF-κB signaling pathway modulation. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:2865–2876. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S248892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ratti M, Lampis A, Ghidini M, Salati M, Mirchev MB, Valeri N, et al. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as new tools for cancer therapy: first steps from bench to bedside. Target Oncol. 2020;15:261–278. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00717-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yoo AS, Sun AX, Li L, Shcheglovitov A, Portmann T, Li Y, et al. MicroRNA-mediated conversion of human fibroblasts to neurons. Nautre. 2011;476:228–231. doi: 10.1038/nature10323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Izarra A, Moscoso I, Levent E, Cañón S, Cerrada I, Díez-Juan A, et al. miR-133a enhances the protective capacity of cardiac progenitors cells after myocardial infarction. Stem Cell Reports. 2014;3:1029–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yáñez-Mó M, Siljander PR, Andreu Z, Zavec AB, Borràs FE, Buzas EI. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4:27066. doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.27066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–659. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Choi HY, Moon SJ, Ratliff BB, Ahn SH, Jung A, Lee M, et al. Microparticles from kidney-derived mesenchymal stem cells act as carriers of proangiogenic signals and contribute to recovery from acute kidney injury. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Figliolini F, Ranghino A, Grange C, Cedrino M, Tapparo M, Cavallari C, et al. Extracellular vesicles from adipose stem cells prevent muscle damage and inflammation in a mouse model of hind limb ischemia: role of neuregulin-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:239–254. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim HS, Choi DY, Yun SJ, Choi SM, Kang JW, Jung JW, et al. Proteomic analysis of microvesicles derived from human mesenchymal stem cells. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:839–849. doi: 10.1021/pr200682z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qiu G, Zheng G, Ge M, Wang J, Huang R, Shu Q, et al. Functional proteins of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:359. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1484-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lener T, Gimona M, Aigner L, Börger V, Buzas E, Camussi G, et al. Applying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials: an ISEV position paper. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4:30087. doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.30087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lim W, Kim HS. Exosomes as therapeutic vehicles for cancer. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;16:213–223. doi: 10.1007/s13770-019-00190-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim M, Yun HW, Park DY, Choi BH, Min BH. Three-dimensional spheroid culture increases exosome secretion from mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;15:427–436. doi: 10.1007/s13770-018-0139-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wiklander OPB, Brennan MÁ, Lötvall J, Breakefield XO, El Andaloussi S. Advances in therapeutic applications of extracellular vesicles. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaav8521. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES