Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1981 Jun 1;22(2):180–188. doi: 10.1186/BF03547507

Ultrastructural Studies of Paratuberculosis (Johne’s Disease) in Goats

Ultrastrukturella studier av paratuberkulos (Johne’s sjukdom) hos get

O P Paliwal 1,2, C Rehbinder 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8300445  PMID: 7304359

Abstract

Biopsy material of the ileum and corresponding mesenteric lymph nodes from 10 naturally infected goats was studied. In ileum a loss of epithelial cells and infiltration of epitheloid cells, macrophages and a low number of lymphocytes, plasma cells and occasional eosinophils were seen. Ultrastructurally, the epithelial cells showed degenerative changes. Epitheloid cells were characterized by a large nucleus and a wide cytoplasm rich in free ribosomes.

Macrophages had been fixed in the process of engulfing bacteria or contained bacteria in phagosomes and phagolysosomes. Large phagolysosomes were common. In macrophages with many or large phagolysosomes, few or no lysosomes were observed. Degenerative changes were seen in macrophages containing many bacteria. Degenerative changes of capillary endothelium were observed. The intercellular spaces were distended by oedema and contained cell debris.

The mesenteric lymph nodes were infiltrated with epitheloid cells and macrophages. The ultrastructural picture of these cells was almost identical to that of the ileum.

The differences between the changes found in naturally infected and experimentally infected animals are discussed. It is concluded that the mode of infection, the number of bacteria to which the animal is exposed and the intervals between events of exposure may play a role.

Keywords: paratuberculosis, goat, ultrastructure

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

References

  1. Allen J M, Brieger EM, Rees R J W. Electron microscopy of the host-cell parasite relation in murine leprosy. J. Path. Ract. 1965;89:301–306. doi: 10.1002/path.1700890131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hart D’Arcy, Armstrong J A P, Brown C A, Draper P. Ultrastructural study of the behaviour of macrophages toward parasitic mycobacteria. Infect. Immun. 1972;5:803–807. doi: 10.1128/IAI.5.5.803-807.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong J A, D’Arcy Hart P. Response of cultured macrophages to Mycobacterium tuberculosis with observations of fusion of lysosome with phagosomes. J. exp. Med. 1971;134:713–740. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.3.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brotherstone J G, Gilmour N J L, Samuel J McA. Quantitative studies of Mycobacterium Johnei in the tissues of sheep. J. comp. Path. 1961;71:286–299. doi: 10.1016/S0368-1742(61)80035-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown C A, Draper P, D’Arcy Hart P. Mycobacteria and lysosomes: a paradox. Nature (Lond.) 1969;221:658–660. doi: 10.1038/221658a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown C A, Draper P. An electron microscope study of rat fibroblasts infected with Mycobacterium lepraemurium. J. Path. 1970;102:21–26. doi: 10.1002/path.1711020105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang Y T, Andersen R N, Vaituzis Z. Growth of Mycobacterium lepraemurium in cultures of mouse peritoneal macrophages. J. Ract. 1967;93:1119–1131. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.3.1119-1131.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Draper P, Rees R J W. Electron transparent zone of Mycobacteria may be a defence mechanism. Nature (Lond.) 1970;228:860–861. doi: 10.1038/228860a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dumont A, Sheldon H. Changes in the fine structure of macrophages in experimentally produced tuberculous granulomas in hamsters. Lab. Invest. 1965;14:2034–2055. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, J. C. S., V. L. Sanger & D. L. Whitenack: Ultrastructural studies of bovine paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease). Vet. Med./Small Anim. Clin. 1976, 71, Jan., 78–83. [PubMed]
  11. Kluge J P, Merkal R S, Monlux W S, Larsen A B, Kopecky K E, Ramsey F K, Lehmann R P. Experimental paratuberculosis in sheep after oral, intratracheal or intravenous inoculation: Lesions and demonstration of etiologic agent. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1968;29:953–962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leake E S, Myrvik Q N. Digestive vacuole formation in alveolar macrophages after phagocytosis of Mycobacterium smegmatis in vivo. J. reticuloendoth. Soc. 1966;3:83–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leake E S, Evans D G, Myrvik Q N. Ultrastructural patterns of bacterial breakdown in normal and granulomatous rabbit alveolar macrophages. J. reticuloendoth. Soc. 1971;9:174–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Majeed, S. K.: The Paratuberculous Inflammatory Process in Goats. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Utrecht, 1972, pp. 104–121.
  15. Merkal R S, Kluge J P, Monlux W S, Larsen A B, Kopecky K E, Quinn L Y, Lehmann R P. Experimental paratuberculosis in sheep after oral, intratracheal or intravenous inoculation: Histochemical localization of hydrolas activities. Amer. J. vet Res. 1968;29:985–994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Merkal R S, Kopecky K E, Larsen A B, Ness R D. Immunologic mechanisms in bovine paratuberculosis. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1970;31:475–485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith K. Electron microscopical observations of Mycobacterium Johnei. Res. Vet. Sci. 1969;10:1–3. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)34478-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES