Abstract
Neuroimaging plays a critical role in the management of patients with gliomas. While conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard imaging modality, it is frequently insufficient to inform clinical decision-making. There is a need for noninvasive strategies for reliably distinguishing low-grade from high-grade gliomas, identifying important molecular features of glioma, choosing an appropriate target for biopsy, delineating target area for surgery or radiosurgery, and distinguishing tumor progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP). One recent advance is the identification of the T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch sign on standard MRI to identify isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant astrocytomas. However, to meet other challenges, neuro-oncologists are increasingly turning to advanced imaging modalities. Diffusion-weighted imaging modalities including diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging can be helpful in delineating tumor margins and better visualization of tissue architecture. Perfusion imaging including dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using gadolinium or ferumoxytol contrast agents can be helpful for grading as well as distinguishing TP from PsP. Positron emission tomography is useful for measuring tumor metabolism, which correlates with grade and can distinguish TP/PsP in the right setting. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy can identify tissue by its chemical composition, can distinguish TP/PsP, and can identify molecular features like 2-hydroxyglutarate. Finally, amide proton transfer imaging measures intracellular protein content, which can be used to identify tumor grade/progression and distinguish TP/PsP.
Keywords: Glioma, pseudoprogression, T2-FLAIR mismatch
Introduction
Neuro-oncologists commonly face diagnostic dilemmas prior to biopsy or resection, and at the time of new radiographic changes after chemoradiotherapy. When a mass is discovered, depending on the location, the clinician must decide between observation, biopsy (and biopsy target), or repeat resection. This decision can be difficult and involves a consideration of the extent of the lesion and involvement of eloquent cortex, whether the tumor is suspected to be high grade or low grade, and the molecular features of the tumor if these can be radiographically identified. Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sometimes sufficient to resolve these dilemmas, for example, when there is a clear rim of enhancement suggesting a high-grade tumor. However, this is not always the case, for example, anaplastic astrocytomas do not always enhance but may be considered a high-grade tumor if they have wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH). Advanced imaging modalities have therefore become an important adjunct tool for grading, choosing a biopsy site, and predicting molecular features.
Posttreatment radiographic changes present the clinician with the task of distinguishing tumor progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP). PsP is fairly common with an estimated frequency of 31% in the largest study of 208 patients and is seen more commonly in O[6]-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylated tumors.1 Methylated tumors have a better prognosis and are more sensitive to DNA damage from both radiation and alkylating chemotherapy. PsP is felt to reflect a more robust treatment response and is associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS), whereas TP portends poor prognosis.2 Of note, posttreatment biopsies seldomly reveal only progression or PsP, and a third of biopsies show a mixture of both, with no clear pathologic definition established.3 Radiologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria represent a significant improvement from MacDonald criteria but are frequently insufficient to guide decision-making in clinical practice, particularly for distinguishing TP/PsP (see Chukwueke et al4 for a summary of the history and challenges of the RANO criteria for gliomas). The resulting uncertainty surrounding posttreatment MRI changes can result in delay of treatment or inappropriate termination of effective chemotherapy, unnecessary surgical interventions, and psychologic stress to patients and families. In this review, we will summarize how advanced imaging modalities can be used by the clinician to inform decision-making in the situations described above.
Diagnostic Clues in Standard MRI
Standard MRI cannot reliably distinguish PsP from TP after radiation, except when new lesions clearly fall outside of the prior radiation treatment field, which is not routinely directly available for review. For example, PsP can manifest on MRI as increased fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal and enhancement along with mass effect, rendering it indistinguishable from the classic features of high-grade glioma. A large study of 321 patients whose initial posttreatment MRIs were systematically analyzed for 11 specific features found that only subependymal enhancement was predictive for TP, with 93% specificity, but only 38% sensitivity.5
Prior to treatment, one specific pattern on standard MRI deserves discussion, as it can be very useful in management of a newly discovered lesion. Mismatch between homogenously hyperintense T2-weighted signal and less-intense FLAIR signal, with a FLAIR-hyperintense peripheral rim (Fig 1), T2-FLAIR mismatch (T2FM) consistently demonstrates almost 100% specificity for IDH-mutant astrocytoma.6,7 Importantly, this might not apply as reliably to tumors with enhancement or cystic components,6 which can mimic this radiographic pattern in oligodendrogliomas.8 Several false-positive cases of T2FM have been reported in pediatric-type gliomas, perhaps limiting the utility of the marker in this population.9 While T2FM demonstrates high positive predictive value when employed judiciously, it is absent in 27% to 88% of IDH mutant astrocytomas, depending on criteria used, and the reason for this remains unknown.6-8,10
Fig 1.

T2-FLAIR mismatch. A 36-year-old man with histologically proven isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant, 1p19q noncodeleted astrocytoma. On T2-weighted imaging (A), there is an area of homogenously hyperintense signal with signs of mass effect. On fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (B), a hypointense signal surrounded by a hyperintense peripheral rim is seen.
Diffusion Imaging
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) uses multiple diffusion gradients to measure the magnitude of the random movements of water molecules, defined as the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Visual inspection of DWI/ADC in gliomas is generally not informative, but by defining a region of interest (ROI), it is possible to generate a histogram from the sum of voxels. Minimum ADC values have been shown to inversely correlate with tumor grade in preoperative glioma.11 Similarly, mean ADC ratios12 and maximal ADC13 values were lower in TP compared with PsP. Notably, these measures are highly dependent on the method used to define the ROI. More recently, high-b-value DWI was used to identify hypercellular tumors, and was a negative predictor of PFS.14 ADC imaging is also a marker for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, which is associated with increased angiogenesis.15,16 There have been attempts to use ADC to distinguish high-grade from low-grade gliomas, and while there is some association, ADC was found to be inferior to dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1-weighted perfusion imaging.17
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) describes the magnitude of diffusion of water molecules as mean diffusivity (MD), and the directionality in a 3-dimensional plane as fractional anisotropy (FA). DTI allows visualization of tissue architecture, particularly white matter tracts. Because gliomas preferentially migrate along white matter tracts, DTI can be more sensitive for delineating the margins of involved parenchyma compared with regular MRI, a feature that can be helpful in surgical planning for resection as well as radiation planning.18 For example, study of 31 patients demonstrated that DTI could reliably be used to predict invasion into the corpus callosum.19 DTI has been reported to distinguish high- from low-grade gliomas,20 and in particular the MD measured in the tumor bulk achieved an accuracy of 91.4%.21 However, in studies comparing multiple modalities, measures of perfusion were superior for grading, and a multimodality algorithm was best.22 While DTI makes the assumption that water diffusion assumes a Gaussian distribution, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) accounts for the fact that the highly organized architecture of brain parenchyma results in a non-Gaussian distribution of water diffusion. DKI has been reported to be superior to DTI for glioma grading and prediction of Ki-67 and additionally DKI was able to distinguish IDH mutant from IDH wild-type tumors.23
Perfusion Imaging
Tumor neovascularization is correlated with glioma grade and inversely correlated with outcomes. Vascular perfusion imaging often can provide information about grade, prognosis, and distinguish TP/PsP. Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI relies on reduced susceptibility signal due to the transit of gadolinium and allows calculation of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) within an ROI that can then be analyzed in several different ways. One method is to include all tumor voxels and calculate a mean rCBV, which is straightforward but averages out potentially important signal from tumor heterogeneity. Another approach is histogram analysis from which multiple measures may be considered (minimum, maximum, mode, etc). Alternately, if a large dataset is available in order to preemptively validate a cutoff value, voxels can be thresholded to this value and then analyzed either as a mean or as a histogram, to avoid including potentially healthy tissue that may skew the results. Using a histogram approach, Kong et al reported that rCBVmax could be normalized to the corresponding contralateral brain location and demonstrated higher rCBV ratios in TP compared to PsP, achieving a sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 77.8% in a prospective cohort of 90 patients.24 Other studies using methodologies similarly found that rCBV distinguishes TP/PsP, with Barajas et al25 using mean rCBV with a 5% threshold cutoff, and Gasperetto et al using a 20% cutoff.26
DCE T1-weighted perfusion MRI imaging (DCE-MRI) is an alternate method that relies on the T1 shortening property of gadolinium, and is a good measure of vascular permeability. This method can be combined with values like rCBV derived from DSC in order to more accurately distinguish TP/PsP.27 A novel thresholding method was reported by Hu et al,28 who subtracted pregadolinium voxel values from postgadolinium in order to create a mask of enhancing voxels, which was then used to define the ROI. Their method not only distinguished TP/PsP but also correlated with overall survival (OS). Other approaches emphasize dynamic measures of contrast such as maximum slope of enhancement, which in one study achieved a 95% sensitivity and 78% specificity for distinguishing TP/PsP.29 These methodological differences highlight the challenge of standardization across institutions.
A limitation of perfusion imaging has been the porous nature of the blood brain barrier (BBB) in gliomas, leading to potentially confounding gadolinium extravasation.30 This is highlighted by reports that correction for contrast extravasation is required to establish correlations between rCBV values and tumor grade.31 An alternative to gadolinium-based contrast agents is the superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle ferumoxytol, whose large size (750 kDa) minimizes leakage through defective endothelium. Ferumoxytol therefore is less sensitive to disruption of the BBB and remains limited to the intravascular compartment.32 In one study of 7 patients with TP, gadolinium-contrasted MRI resulted in artefactually low rCBV measures, whereas ferumoxytol-contrasted MRI correctly measured high rCBV in all 7 patients.33 A subsequent study by the same group demonstrated that in posttreatment MRI changes, rCBV measures using ferumoxytol were strongly predictive of OS, and low rCBV in this group showed a hazard ratio of .098 (P = .004). Additionally, the authors showed that mismatched cases with high rCBV using ferumoxytol and low rCBV using gadolinium had OS that closely matched the OS of tumor progressors, suggesting that the rCBV values generated using ferumoxytol were indeed correct.34 Subsequently, their group used ferumoxytol-contrasted MRI to distinguish progression from PsP in 56 patients with GBM, and then followed them according to RANO criteria.
Pulsed continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) is a measure of perfusion that is relatively insensitive to porous BBB. Unlike the other methods reviewed above, pCASL does not require a contrast agent. Rather, blood is “labeled” by a radiofrequency pulse and continuous labeling in a defined plane that inverts or saturates the water molecules in blood, creating contrast that is leveraged as an indirect measure of blood flow in the area of interest.35 pCASL has been reported to have increased sensitivity (94%) compared with DCE-MRI (71%) and may be particularly useful for distinguishing tumor from radiation necrosis.36 This technique may also be used to stratify for PFS37 and can be used in conjunction with other advanced imaging techniques to distinguish TP/PsP.38 However, use of pCASL is limited by low signal to noise ratio and low resolution.
Positron Emission Tomography
Positron emission tomography (PET) measures positrons emitted from administered radiotracers, which typically contact electrons only a very short distance from their emission point, on the order of 1 mm. Contacted electrons are annihilated, producing photons travelling in opposite vectors that are, respectively, detected by the scanner and from which the initial point of annihilation can be calculated. The resulting overall spatial resolution of PET scanners is about 5 mm.39
The most widely used radiotracer is 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a glucose analog that is a direct measure of metabolic rate. Standardized uptake value can be compared between the region of the tumor and a reference region to semiquantitatively measure metabolic activity, thereby differentiating low- and high-grade gliomas.40 The Warburg effect predisposes toward glucose metabolism in high-grade gliomas as in other tumors, and therefore, they are highly FDG avid.41 FDG avidity also correlates with overall cell density.42 However, because the brain has intrinsically high rates of glucose metabolism (particularly in gray matter), the distinction in FDG avidity between normal brain parenchyma and low-grade glioma is less reliable. In retrospective studies, metabolic activity by FDG PET was correlated with OS independent of other prognostic factors.43 In a retrospective study of 59 patients with glioma, FDG uptake was significantly lower in IDH1-mutant gliomas, and, for those with IDH1 wild-type tumors, increased FDG uptake predicted decreased survival.44 Finally, a meta-analysis found FDG PET to be a promising method for detecting recurrent glioma, with sensitivity 0.77 and specificity 0.78.45 It has been suggested that this distinction can be leveraged to identify anaplastic transformation in a previously histologically low-grade tumor that shows high FDG avidity.43
Standard FDG PET is unreliable for distinguishing TP from metabolically active processes seen in PsP that are presumed to be inflammatory.46 However, serial imaging after FDG injection and at a delayed time point can distinguish TP/PsP. While active tumors show increased uptake in delayed imaging (Fig 2), inflammatory lesions retain stable or decreasing FDG uptake over time (Fig 3).47 Thus, serial FDG PET imaging is superior to single timepoint imaging for distinguishing TP/PsP.
Fig 2.
Tumor progression identified by delayed PET imaging. A 60-year-old man with bifrontal grade III anaplastic oligodendroglioma. One year following resection and chemoradiation, postgadolinium T1-weighted imaging showed enhancement along the inferior right margin of the resection cavity along the right frontal horn (A). PET imaging 1 hour after 18-fluorodeoxyglucose administration revealed focal increase in uptake in the target lesion (B). Delayed acquisition at 4 hours showed 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake did not decrease over time relative to normal brain structures (C), suggesting recurrent tumor rather than pseudoprogression, subsequently confirmed four months later (D).
Fig 3.
Radiation necrosis identified by delayed PET imaging. A 41-year-old man with grade III anaplastic astrocytoma. Two years after resection and chemoradiation, the patient was found to have an enhancing lesion along the right brachium pontis on postgadolinium T1-weighted imaging (A). At 1 hour, there was mild focal uptake (B) that decreased on delayed imaging at 4 hours after 18-fluorodeoxyglucose administration (C), suggesting radiation necrosis. Seven months later, postgadolinium T1-weighted imaging revealed decreased enhancement in the original area (D).
Radiolabeled amino acids are preferentially taken up in proliferating cells and have been studied for distinguishing TP from PsP. [11C]-Methionine (MET) uptake correlates with glioma grade,48 vascularity,48 and rCBV.48,49 In a study of hybrid MET-PET/MRI versus MRI for progression versus PsP, MRI had 86.1% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity compared with 97.1% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity for MET-PET/MRI.50 A direct comparison of MET versus FDG PET imaging obtained on the same day concluded that MET was more reliable in identifying recurrent tumor than FDG,51 and this has been confirmed by subsequent meta-analysis.52 Combining MET-PET and DCE perfusion imaging modalities similarly demonstrated significantly increased sensitivity and specificity for identifying TP.37 Nonetheless, the clinical use of MET is complicated by its short half-life of 20 minutes, requiring an onsite cyclotron and precise coordination of its administration.53
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) detects specific metabolites in a defined ROI. Tumor tissue has an MRS signature of elevated choline due to increased cell density and total cell membrane, and decreased NAA due to decreased neuronal content. Necrosis has an MRS signature of elevated lipid and lactate peaks, but in contrast with solid tumor tissue, choline levels may be lower due to the absence of intact cells. For this reason, it is important to be aware of necrotic areas when choosing an ROI for analysis.54,55 TP has a higher choline/creatinine ratio compared to PsP in recently resected glioblastoma, and in one study could correctly categorized 27 of 28 patients.56 A meta-analysis reviewed 55 studies and a total of 1,174 patients with high-grade gliomas after chemoradiation and compared sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing TP/PsP based on anatomical MRI (5 studies, 166 patients), ADC (7 studies, 204 patients), DSC perfusion (18 studies, 708 patients), DCE perfusion (5 studies, 207 patients), and MRS (9 studies, 203 patients). The performance of MRS was superior to other modalities, with pooled sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 95% for tumor.57 To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive comparison of individual advanced imaging approaches, although it did not include amide proton transfer (APT) or PET. Of note, some groups have proposed multiparametric scoring algorithms using DWI, rCBV, and MRS for improved diagnostic accuracy.58
2-Hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) is an oncometabolite produced by IDH mutant tumors,59 which has a characteristic peak on MRS.60 In a study of 30 patients with gliomas, detection of elevated 2HG by MRS perfectly correlated (100%) with IDH1/2 mutation.61 A recent prospective study of 136 patients followed 2-HG levels over repeated scans throughout treatment. Using a cutoff of 1 mM 2-HG, the authors reported 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity for IDH mutation subsequently confirmed by histology, and of patients who were unable to undergo resection, a molecular diagnosis could be established in 67% by MRS. Impressively, the authors were able to measure a rapid increase in 2-HG concentration in tumors under observation at the time of their progression.62 Therefore, clinicians may find it useful to track 2-HG levels in low-grade gliomas under observation, to identify progression even in the absence of classic features on standard MRI.
Amide Proton Transfer
APT was initially developed as a method for measuring intracellular protein content by leveraging the amide backbone of polypeptides.63 Increased APT resonance can result from a combination of increased amide (protein) content or increased amide proton exchange rate. In tumor tissue, this effect is a by-product of increased intracellular pH that catalyzes amide proton exchange. Studies have demonstrated increased APT-weighted (APTw) signal in glioma compared with unchanged or decreased APTw signal in treatment effect.64 A single center prospective study followed 32 patients with serial imaging over 6 months, comparing TP, which was defined as an increase in radiographic size of the lesion over 6 months, with tumor stabilization or regression attributed to treatment effect. APTw mean intensities were almost twofold higher in PT compared with PsP, and a cutoff of mean APTw of 2.42% generated 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity.65 A subsequent report from the same group paired MRI with biopsy, allowing for comparison of APTw signal intensity with histopathology from the same location. The authors reported a positive correlation between APTw signal intensity and tumor histopathology, as well as cellularity and proliferation index, and generated an ROC with 85.1% sensitivity and 94.1% specificity for identifying TP. However, one major limitation of APT is that blood products can independently increase APT signal, potentially confounding the results.
APTw imaging may also be predictive of grade and critical prognostic factors. Togao and Honda reported that in 36 patients with a histologically proven glioma, APT signal intensity was elevated in high-grade gliomas and there was a positive correlation with Ki-67.66 A retrospective analysis of 27 patients showed increased APTw signal in IDH wild-type tumors compared with IDH mutant tumors,67 as confirmed in a second cohort of patients with glioblastoma.68 Other independent groups have confirmed these results, reporting an association between increased APTw signal with high-grade histology, worse clinical outcomes, and IDH mutant status,68,69 but no association with MGMT methylation status.69 In summary, APTw imaging can help distinguish tumor from treatment effect, especially when used in combination with other imaging modalities (Fig 4).70
Fig 4.
Progression confirmed by multiple advanced imaging modalities. A 50-year-old man with previously treated right parietal isocitrate dehydrogenase nonmutated glioblastoma who developed headache and nausea 12 months after chemoradiotherapy. A new area of abnormality on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (A) is seen in the right splenium with enhancement (B) and mass effect. This area also shows increased amide proton transfer signal (C) and increased perfusion by both dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (D) and arterial spin labeling (E). Subsequent imaging showed an enlarging mass and the patient went on to salvage therapy.
Pseuodoresponse to Vascular Therapies
Despite failing to improve OS in randomized trials in glioblastoma, bevacizumab is still in use for management of glioma. Bevacizumab is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor antibody that results in decreased endothelial permeability and peritumoral edema as well as contrast extravasation. This has been termed pseudoresponse, since bevacizumab decreases enhancement but this is not necessarily indicative of tumor regression or improved survival.71 Similar effects have been noted with the pan-VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor cediranib,72 and may also occur with corticosteroids due to their vascular effects. Overall, these effects are most confounding for measures of perfusion, except ferumoxytol based rCBV measures that are relatively insensitive to the effects of VEGF inhibitors. Other modalities including MRS and APT are less sensitive to targeting VEGF. Of note, bevacizumab treatment has been associated with DWI-positive T1 hyperintense lesions that on histology are revealed to be calcified areas of necrosis, and which clinically are associated with improved survival.73
Conclusions
In summary, we have reviewed a selection of imaging modality approaches that can offer helpful information to assist the clinicians facing challenging decisions in glioma management. Major areas of need continue to be noninvasive prediction of molecular features, as well as choosing biopsy site or extent of resection in preoperative management. In postoperative management, distinguishing progression versus PsP is the major challenge. For distinguishing PsP, the authors recommend a combined approach that includes perfusion imaging, APT, and MRS or PET, with awareness of the limitations of each so that they can be applied in a personalized fashion to individual patients to be most informative. Future studies are needed to explore multimodality advanced imaging algorithms that can be standardized across institutions and ideally become incorporated into clinical trials.
Acknowledgments and Disclosure:
This study was supported in part by an R25 grant to Alipi Bonm (NS079200). The authors report no conflicts or disclosures.
Contributor Information
Alipi V. Bonm, Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Reed Ritterbusch, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Patrick Throckmorton, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Jerome J. Graber, Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Alvord Brain Tumor Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA..
References
- 1.Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, et al. MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2192–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gerstner ER, McNamara MB, Norden AD, et al. Effect of adding temozolomide to radiation therapy on the incidence of pseudoprogression. J Neurooncol 2009;94:97–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Forsyth PA, Kelly PJ, Cascino TL, et al. Radiation necrosis or glioma recurrence: is computer-assisted stereotactic biopsy useful? J Neurosurg 1995;82:436–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chukwueke UN, Wen PY. Use of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria in clinical trials and clinical practice. CNS Oncol 2019;8:CNS28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Young RJ, Gupta A, Shah AD, et al. Potential utility of conventional MRI signs in diagnosing pseudoprogression in glioblastoma. Neurology 2011;76:1918–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Broen MPG, Smits M, Wijnenga MMJ, et al. The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign as an imaging marker for non-enhancing IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-intact lower-grade glioma: a validation study. Neuro Oncol 2018;20:1393–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Batchala PP, Muttikkal TJE, Donahue JH, et al. Neuroimaging-based classification algorithm for predicting 1p/19q-Codeletion status in IDH-mutant lower grade gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:426–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Juratli TA, Tummala SS, Riedl A, et al. Radiographic assessment of contrast enhancement and T2/FLAIR mismatch sign in lower grade gliomas: correlation with molecular groups. J Neurooncol 2019;141:327–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Johnson DR, Kaufmann TJ, Patel SH, et al. There is an exception to every rule—T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in gliomas. Neuroradiology 2019;61:225–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Patel SH, Poisson LM, Brat DJ, et al. T2–FLAIR mismatch, an imaging biomarker for IDH and 1p/19q status in lower-grade gliomas: a TCGA/TCIA project. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:6078–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hilario A, Ramos A, Perez-Nunez A, et al. The added value of apparent diffusion coefficient to cerebral blood volume in the preoperative grading of diffuse gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:701–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hein PA, Eskey CJ, Dunn JF, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: tumor recurrence versus radiation injury. Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:201–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Asao C, Korogi Y, Kitajima M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of radiation-induced brain injury for differentiation from tumor recurrence. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1455–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pramanik PP, Parmar HA, Mammoser AG, et al. Hypercellularity components of glioblastoma identified by high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015;92:811–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Halatsch M-E, Schmidt U, Behnke-Mursch J, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and other malignant brain tumours. Cancer Treat Rev 2006;32:74–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Young RJ, Gupta A, Shah AD, et al. Potential role of preoperative conventional MRI including diffusion measurements in assessing epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification status in patients with glioblastoma. Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2271–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arevalo-Perez J, Peck KK, Young RJ, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in grading of gliomas. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:792–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Price SJ,Jena R, Burnet NG, et al. Improved delineation of glioma margins and regions of infiltration with the use of diffusion tensor imaging: an image-guided biopsy study. Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1969–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kallenberg K, Goldmann T, Menke J, et al. Glioma infiltration of the corpus callosum: early signs detected by DTI. J Neurooncol 2013;112:217–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Inoue T, Ogasawara K, Beppu T, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging for preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in gliomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2005;107:174–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.El-Serougy L, Abdel Razek AAK, Ezzat A, et al. Assessment of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas. Neuroradiol J 2016;29:400–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Van Cauter S, De Keyzer F, Sima DM, et al. Integrating diffusion kurtosis imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging for grading gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2014;16:1010–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hempel J-M, Bisdas S, Schittenhelm J, et al. In vivo molecular profiling of human glioma using diffusion kurtosis imaging. J Neurooncol 2017;131:93–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kong DS, Kim ST, Kim EH, et al. Diagnostic dilemma of pseudoprogression in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastomas: the role of assessing relative cerebral blood flow volume and oxygen-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status. Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:382–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barajas RF Jr, Chang JS, Segal MR, et al. Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2009;253:486–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gasparetto EL, Pawlak MA, Patel SH, et al. Posttreatment recurrence of malignant brain neoplasm: accuracy of relative cerebral blood volume fraction in discriminating low from high malignant histologic volume fraction. Radiology 2009;250:887–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shin KE, Ahn KJ, Choi HS, et al. DCE and DSC MR perfusion imaging in the differentiation of recurrent tumour from treatment-related changes in patients with glioma. Clin Radiol 2014;69:e264–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hu LS, Eschbacher JM, Heiserman JE, et al. Reevaluating the imaging definition of tumor progression: perfusion MRI quantifies recurrent glioblastoma tumor fraction, pseudoprogression, and radiation necrosis to predict survival. Neuro Oncol 2012;14:919–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Narang J, Jain R, Arbab AS, et al. Differentiating treatment-induced necrosis from recurrent/progressive brain tumor using nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR perfusion. Neuro Oncol 2011;13:1037–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sorensen AG. Perfusion MR imaging: moving forward. Radiology 2008;249:416–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Boxerman JL, Schmainda KM, Weisskoff RM. Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:859–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bashir MR, Bhatti L, Marin D, et al. Emerging applications for ferumoxytol as a contrast agent in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:884–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gahramanov S, Raslan AM, Muldoon LL, et al. Potential for differentiation of pseudoprogression from true tumor progression with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using ferumoxytol vs gadoteridol: A pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;79:514–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gahramanov S, Muldoon LL, Varallyay CG, et al. Pseudoprogression of glioblastoma after chemo-and radiation therapy: diagnosis by using dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with ferumoxytol versus gadoteridol and correlation with survival. Radiology 2013;266:842–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dai W, Garcia D, De Bazelaire C, et al. Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1488–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ozsunar Y, Mullins ME, Kwong K, et al. Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis?: a pilot comparison of arterial spin-labeled, dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MRI, and FDG-PET imaging. Acad Radiol 2010;17:282–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qiao Z, Zhao X, Wang K, et al. Utility of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted MR imaging and 11C-Methionine PET/CT for differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation injury in patients with high-grade gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:253–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Choi YJ, Kim HS, Jahng G-H, et al. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging. Acta Radiol 2013;54:448–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.la Fougere C, Suchorska B, Bartenstein P, et al. Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations. Neuro Oncol 2011;13:806–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chiang GC, Kovanlikaya I, Choi C, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, positron emission tomography and radiogenomics–relevance to glioma. Front Neurol 2018;9:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chiro DG, DeLaPaz RL, Brooks RA, et al. Glucose utilization of cerebral gliomas measured by [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography. Neurology 1982;32:1323–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Herholz K, Pietrzyk U, Voges J, et al. Correlation of glucose consumption and tumor cell density in astrocytomas: a stereotactic PET study. J Neurosurg 1993;79:853–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Padma MV, Said S, Jacobs M, et al. Prediction of pathology and survival by FDG PET in gliomas. J Neurooncol 2003;64:227–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim D, Kim S, Kim SH, et al. Prediction of overall survival based on Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation and 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT in patients with cerebral gliomas. Clin Nucl Med 2018;43:311–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nihashi T, Dahabreh IJ, Terasawa T. Diagnostic accuracy of PET for recurrent glioma diagnosis: a meta-analysis. Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:944–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Santra A, Kumar R, Sharma P, et al. F-18 FDG PET-CT in patients with recurrent glioma: comparison with contrast enhanced MRI. Eur J Rad 2012;81:508–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Horky LL, Hsiao EM, Weiss SE, et al. Dual phase FDG-PET imaging of brain metastases provides superior assessment of recurrence versus post-treatment necrosis. J Neurooncol 2011;103:137–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sadeghi N, Salmon I, Decaestecker C, et al. Stereotactic comparison among cerebral blood volume, methionine uptake, and histopathology in brain glioma. Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:455–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sadeghi N, Salmon I, Tang B, et al. Correlation between dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI and methionine metabolism in brain gliomas: preliminary results. J Magn Res Imag 2006;24:989–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Deuschl C, Kirchner J, Poeppel TD, et al. 11 C–MET PET/MRI for detection of recurrent glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:593–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tripathi M, Sharma R, Varshney R, et al. Comparison of F-18 FDG and C-11 methionine PET/CT for the evaluation of recurrent primary brain tumors. Clin Nucl Med 2012;37:158–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu W, Gao L, Shao A, et al. The performance of 11C-Methionine PET in the differential diagnosis of glioma recurrence. Oncotarget 2017;8:91030–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Langen K-J, Watts C. Neuro-oncology: amino acid PET for brain tumours–ready for the clinic? Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:375–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rock JP, Hearshen D, Scarpace L, et al. Correlations between magnetic resonance spectroscopy and image-guided histopathology, with special attention to radiation necrosis. Neurosurg 2002;51:912–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rock JP, Scarpace L, Hearshen D, et al. Associations among magnetic resonance spectroscopy, apparent diffusion coefficients, and image-guided histopathology with special attention to radiation necrosis. Neurosurg 2004;54:1111–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Weybright P, Sundgren PC, Maly P, et al. Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using MR spectroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1471–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.van Dijken BRJ, van Laar PJ, Holtman GA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for treatment response evaluation in patients with high-grade glioma, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2017;27:4129–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Matsusue E, Fink JR, Rockhill JK, et al. Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2010;52:297–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Dang L, Yen K, Attar EC. IDH mutations in cancer and progress toward development of targeted therapeutics. Ann Oncol 2016;27:599–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pope WB, Prins RM, Thomas MA, et al. Non-invasive detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate and other metabolites in IDH1 mutant glioma patients using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurooncol 2012;107:197–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Choi C, Ganji SK, DeBerardinis RJ, et al. 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nat Med 2012;18:624–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Choi C, Raisanen JM, Ganji SK, et al. Prospective longitudinal analysis of 2-hydroxyglutarate magnetic resonance spectroscopy identifies broad clinical utility for the management of patients with IDH-mutant glioma. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:4030–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhou J, Payen JF, Wilson DA, et al. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat Med 2003;9:1085–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhou J, Tryggestad E, Wen Z, et al. Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides. Nat Med 2011;17:130–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ma B, Blakeley JO, Hong X, et al. Applying amide proton transfer-weighted MRI to distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression in malignant gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:456–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Togao O, Yoshiura T, Keupp J, et al. Amide proton transfer imaging of adult diffuse gliomas: correlation with histopathological grades. Neuro Oncol 2014;16:441–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Du Y, van Zijl PCM, Wen Z, et al. Predicting IDH mutation status in grade II gliomas using amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI. Magn Reson in Med 2017;78:1100–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Joo B, Han K, Ahn SS, et al. Amide proton transfer imaging might predict survival and IDH mutation status in high-grade glioma. European Radiol 2019;29:6643–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Paech D, Windschuh J, Oberhollenzer J, et al. Assessing the predictability of IDH mutation and MGMT methylation status in glioma patients using relaxation-compensated multipool CEST MRI at 7.0 T. Neuro Oncol 2018;20:1661–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Togao O, Hiwatashi A, Yamashita K, et al. Grading diffuse gliomas without intense contrast enhancement by amide proton transfer MR imaging: comparisons with diffusion-and perfusion-weighted imaging. Eur Radiol 2017;27:578–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Da Cruz LCH, Rodriguez I, Domingues RC, et al. Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma. Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1978–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Batchelor TT, Sorensen AG, di Tomaso E, et al. AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell 2007;11:83–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bähr O, Harter PN, Weise LM, et al. Sustained focal antitumor activity of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology 2014;83:227–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



