Skip to main content
JTCVS Techniques logoLink to JTCVS Techniques
editorial
. 2020 Feb 23;3:188–189. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.02.010

Commentary: Carbon dioxide embolism during vein harvesting—Directed transesophageal echocardiography for diagnosis and hemodynamic rescue

John G Augoustides 1,
PMCID: PMC8302867  PMID: 34317866

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

John G. Augoustides, MD, FASE, FAHA

Central Message.

Massive carbon dioxide embolism is a rare complication of endoscopic saphenous vein harvest. Transesophageal echocardiography can guide diagnosis and management.

See Article page 183.

Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting has matured as a minimally invasive technique for vascular conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting.1 The complications of this technique include gas embolism.2, 3, 4 The roles of transesophageal echocardiography in the management of this catastrophic complication can be lifesaving.3,4

The case reported by Kawabori and colleagues5 in this issue highlights the central role of transesophageal echocardiography in this setting. During conduit harvest, significant carbon dioxide embolism resulted in cardiac arrest. The vigilant team instituted prompt cardiopulmonary bypass and echocardiographic-directed management. The case was complicated by right ventricular failure, requiring aggressive pharmacologic support and delayed sternal closure. The patient had a complete recovery, with no neurologic sequelae.

How might this case inform the conduct of endoscopic vein harvest in light of the current literature? One option is to avoid an endoscopic approach in select patients, given its reported reduced graft patency.6 This decision could be guided by a new risk score for saphenous vein graft failure.7 Further trials will refine the conduct of saphenous vein harvest to enhance patency, including attention to a no-touch technique.8,9

What are our options when an endoscopic approach is selected for vein harvest? Clearly, meticulous technique with careful carbon dioxide insufflation remains essential.1, 2, 3 Transesophageal echocardiography can allow rapid diagnosis of gas embolism, as exemplified by this case.5 Although this diagnostic modality is still debated in coronary artery bypass grafting, it should be available to evaluate hemodynamic compromise.3,4,10 The midesophageal bicaval view can capture the passage of gas emboli and suggest the likely source.3, 4, 5 If the gas emboli access the right atrium through the inferior vena cava, the source is below the diaphragm.5,11 If the gas emboli access the right atrium from the superior vena cava, the source is above the diaphragm.3, 4, 5

Furthermore, in gas embolism, the right atrial pressure is commonly elevated.3, 4, 5 Right coronary ischemia is common, resulting in bradycardia and right ventricular failure.3, 4, 5 The right atrial hypertension may stretch a patent foramen ovale to allow right-to-left shunting, which can be reduced with medical and surgical interventions.3, 4, 5,12, 13

So, where do we go from here? This complex case has focused attention on transesophageal echocardiography for hemodynamic rescue in carbon dioxide embolism.5 It can reliably diagnose this complication and guide an integrated management response.3, 4, 5 In this case, the heart team proceeded with bicaval cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. The inferior vena caval cannula coupled with a snare provided a prompt route for clearance of gas emboli. The data from transesophageal echocardiography can also guide the escalation of support for the failing ventricle.14,15

In conclusion, Kawabori and colleagues5 are to be congratulated for highlighting the integrated management of carbon dioxide embolism. The vigilant heart team should include transesophageal echocardiography in the response to this complication.3, 4, 5 A multimodal approach is typically required for hemodynamic rescue and subsequent ventricular support.3, 4, 5,14,15 Future trials will likely refine the conduct of endoscopic vein harvesting, which may further minimize the risk of this complication.

Footnotes

Disclosures: The author reported no conflicts of interest.

The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Genovesi M.H., Roberrtazzi R.R., Vitali R.M., Connolly M., Subramanian V.A. Recent progress in minimally invasive conduit harvesting. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;14:82–88. doi: 10.1053/stcs.2002.31895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lin T.Y., Chiu K.M., Wang M.J., Chu S.H. Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:2011–2015. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)01323-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fan L., Denisco D., Knorz D.L., Mapes R.M., Nader N.D. A case report of a carbon dioxide embolism caused by endoscopic vein harvesting during cardiac surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;63:161–164. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mommerot A., Peraault L.P. Carbon dioxide embolism induced by endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting during coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:1502. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.047. author reply 1502-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kawabori M., Kinford C., Ortoleva J., Couper G.S. Cardiac arrest from massive carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020;3:183–185. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kodia K., Patel S., Weber M.P., Luc J.G.Y., Choi J.H., Maynes E.J., et al. Graft patency after open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;154:586–597. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.07.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Antonopoulos A.S., Odutayo A., Oikonomou E.K., Trivella M., Petrou M., Collins G.S., et al. SAFINOUS-CABG (Saphenous Vein Graft Failure—An Outcomes Study in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) group Development of a risk score for early saphenous vein graft failure: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. August 26, 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.07.086. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dreifaldt M., Mannion J.D., Geijer H., Lidén M., Bodin L., Souza D. The no-touch saphenous vein is an excellent conduit to the radial artery 8 years after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. October 26, 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.177. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burns D.J.P. Commentary: better prediction, better execution, better management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. August 22, 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.07.078. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.MacKay E.J., Werner R.M., Groeneveld P.W., Desai N.D., Reese P.P., Gutsche J.T., et al. Transesophageal echocardiography, acute kidney injury, and length of hospitalization among adults undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34:687–695. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.08.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kale R.D., Sarwar M.F., Sopchak A. Intraoperative massive carbon dioxide embolism captured with transesophageal echocardiography in a patient with a rare vena cava anomaly. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33:157–161. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patel P.A., Hall A., Augoustides J.G.T., Patel S., Feinman J.W., Weber B., et al. Dynamic shunting across a patent foramen ovale in adult cardiac surgery—perioperative challenges and management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;32:542–549. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ramakrishna H., Patel P.A., Gutsche J.T., Kohl B.A., Savino J.S., Augoustides J.G. Incidental patent foramen ovale in adult cardiac surgery: recent evidence and management options for the perioperative echocardiographer. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28:1691–1695. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bhama J.K., Bansal U., Winger D.G., Teuteberg J.J., Bermudez C., Kormos R.L., et al. Clinical experience with temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1885–1891. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kwak J., Majewski M.B., Jellish W.S. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the new Jack-of-all-trades? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34:192–207. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JTCVS Techniques are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES