Central Message.
This synergistic repair confers a greater chance of eliminating the VSD and its associated intracardiac shunting, potentially improving early recovery, hospital discharge, and overall survival.
See Commentaries on pages 202 and 204.
Case Report
Patient 1
A 73-year-old man with a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia presented to our emergency room with a 3-day history of chest pain radiating to the left arm and jaw claudication. Left heart catheterization revealed 3-vessel disease, including 100% occlusion of the proximal right coronary artery (RCA). A drug eluting stent was placed to the RCA and ticagrelor was started. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed a large inferior ventricular septal defect (VSD) with left-right flow. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and a pulmonary artery catheter were placed. He was bridged with cangrelor and taken to the operating room 5 days later.
After median sternotomy, the patient was placed on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) via ascending aorta and bicaval cannulation. A vertical ventriculotomy was performed in the infarcted tissue. An inferior VSD was identified (Figure 1, A and B). Based on the transesophageal echocardiographic measurement and the direct intraoperative measurement of the defect with a ruler and an upsize of 10% to 20%, a 28-mm Amplatzer septal occlude device (ASOD; Abbot, Chicago, Ill) was directly deployed in the defect by the surgeon (Figure 1, C, and Video 1). Interrupted 2-0 Ethibond (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) pledgeted sutures were placed circumferentially around the defect, with each suture passing through the device as well. A patch exclusion repair was performed by passing the sutures through a bovine pericardium patch and tied down (Figure 1, D). The ventriculotomy was closed with reinforced felt strips.1 The patient was successfully weaned off CPB with IABP support and minimal inotropes. The transesophageal echocardiogram after CPB revealed no residual VSD (Figure 2, A and B). The sternum was left open because of poor right ventricle function, with delayed closure performed 2 days later.
The postoperative course was significant for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy, atrial fibrillation requiring cardioversion, and acute renal failure requiring temporary hemodialysis. The patient had a full recovery of his renal function and was discharged to a rehabilitation facility after 1 month. The 2-month follow-up echocardiogram demonstrated no residual VSD (Figure 2, C and D).
Patient 2
A 53-year-old man with a history of human immunodeficiency virus, hypertension, active smoking, and alcohol abuse had presented with increasing shortness of breath, lethargy, chest pain, and orthopnea. A new loud systolic murmur was noted on physical examination, and a chest radiograph showed pulmonary edema. He was admitted and treated with intravenous diuretics. However, the patient left against medical advice before an echocardiogram had been obtained. He presented to our outpatient clinic 3 days later with progressive shortness of breath, weight gain, and associated chest discomfort. An echocardiogram showed inferior akinesis and a large inferior VSD. Left heart catheterization demonstrated isolated posterior descending artery territory infarct (99% stenosis) with moderate atrioventricular groove RCA disease and severe mid-left anterior descending disease. He was taken to the operating room 2 days after readmission.
After placement of an IABP and median sternotomy, the left internal mammary artery was harvested, and the patient was placed on CPB via the ascending aorta and bicaval cannulation. Left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending anastomosis was completed. The ventriculotomy revealed a 20-mm inferior VSD, which was repaired as described for patient 1 using a 24-mm ASOD and bovine pericardial patch. The patient was successfully weaned off of CPB with IABP and minimum inotropes. The transesophageal echocardiogram after CBP revealed unchanged biventricular function and no residual VSD. The patient was decannulated and the chest closed.
His postoperative course was generally unremarkable, except for a return to the operating room for bleeding on the day of surgery. He was discharged home on postoperative day 5. He had continued to do well at his postoperative clinic visit. In this case series, because no personal health information that could identify the patients was provided, our research policy does not require informed consent for reporting these cases.
Discussion
Many techniques are available for postinfarction VSD repair. However, the overall mortality has remained very high.1, 2, 3 Open surgery with deployment of an ASOD alone has also been reported with variable success.3 The percutaneous approach for placement of an ASOD has been essentially limited to treating recurrent and/or residual postinfarction VSD after surgical repair owing to the high rate of failure and mortality as a single treatment modality.4
We report a novel technique combining surgical exclusion patch closure with an ASOD. We hypothesized that this technique would reduce, not only the rate of ASOD failure because it is deployed under direct vision, but also the rate of patch dehiscence because it is reinforced with the rigid ASOD. This synergistic repair confers a greater chance of eliminating the VSD and its associated intracardiac shunting and negating the potential right-to-left shunt and its associated complications that have often been reported when a left ventricular assist device or an Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, Mass) has been used in these patients.5 Thus, use of this synergistic repair will potentially improve early recovery, hospital discharge, and overall survival.
In conclusion, no consensus has been reached for the optimal surgical treatment option for repair of postinfarction VSDs. Coupling the patch exclusion technique with an ASOD for the treatment of postinfarction VSD is a dependable technique with excellent short-term results. However, the long-term outcomes of this approach remain unknown.
Footnotes
Disclosures: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary Data
References
- 1.David T.E., Dale L., Sun Z. Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: repair by endocardial patch with infarct exclusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:1315. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70054-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Daggett W.M. Postinfarction VSD repair: retrospective thoughts and historical perspective. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:1006. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)91151-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee M.S., Kozitza R., Mudrick D., Williams M., Lodge A.J., Harrison J.K. Intraoperative device closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:e48–e50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maree A., Jneid H., Palacios I. Percutaneous closure of a postinfarction ventricular septal defect that recurred after surgical repair. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1626. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kshettry V., Salerno C., Bank A. Risk of left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplant following postinfarction ventricular septal rupture. J Card Surg. 1997;12:93–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1997.tb00101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.