Skip to main content
JTCVS Techniques logoLink to JTCVS Techniques
editorial
. 2020 Apr 11;3:202–203. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.03.036

Commentary: Belt and suspenders—Hybrid repair of postinfarct VSDs using the Amplatzer device and patch-exclusion

Vivek Patel 1, Ravi K Ghanta 1,
PMCID: PMC8302878  PMID: 34317871

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Vivek Patel, MD (left), and Ravi K. Ghanta, MD (right)

Central Message.

A novel hybrid repair for postinfarction ventricular septal defects might represent a reasonable solution to a vexing problem.

See Article page 198.

Postinfarction ventricular septal defects (VSDs) result in a left-to-right shunt and biventricular failure and are almost universally fatal without surgical repair. Even with repair, mortality can be as high as 60%.1 Anterior VSDs are more common, typically involve an infarction along the left anterior descending territory and are relatively easier to repair compared with posterior VSDs, which result from an infarction in the right coronary artery distribution and are more technically challenging to repair given the posterior location. Historically, delayed repair was preferred because it allowed for formation of a scar around the infarcted area, which helped hold sutures more securely.1 Ensuring a secure repair of the defect with a patch, which will prevent patch dehiscence, bleeding, or residual VSD remains the most vexing problem for this condition.

The Daggett repair, one of the first popular techniques to repair postinfarction VSDs, involves resection of the necrotic septum and ventricle free wall, followed by a 2-patch repair, 1 for the VSD and 1 for the ventriculotomy.2 Both patches are reinforced with pledgeted sutures. The ventriculotomy can also be closed with felt strips and pledgeted sutures. The more contemporary David repair involves a patch-exclusion of the defect by securing a patch to healthy endocardium, septum, or ventricular free wall around the infarcted tissue.3 Emerging repair techniques now include the use of the percutaneous Amplatzer septal occluder device (ASOD; Abbot, Chicago, Ill), a self-expanding plug composed of nitinol and titanium, or mechanical circulatory support (ie, Impella; Abiomed, Danvers, Mass) as a bridge before definitive repair.1,4,5

Using this novel hybrid surgical technique, Madou et al4 reports repair of postinfarction VSDs with the ASOD, which was deployed after ventriculotomy, and an additional patch-exclusion with bovine pericardium to provide a more rigid, secure 2-layer repair. The advantage of this hybrid repair is that the ASOD provides a more rigid repair compared with open patch repair alone. The technique used by Madou et al4 has never been reported before, although the ASOD has been used for percutaneous repair of postinfarction VSDs. Their technique might be superior to the percutaneous application, because it allows for complete visual inspection of the infarcted area and ventricle free wall, which will often require additional repair.4 Percutaneous placement of the ASOD for postinfarction VSDs has been investigated. However, at present, limited evidence is available to support its use, except perhaps in patients who might not be surgical candidates owing to significant comorbidities.1,5 Periprocedural complications such as device dislodgement, ventricular rupture, embolization, and reintervention have been reported to be as high as 44%.5 Additionally, the use of the ASOD for either percutaneous or hybrid repair is limited to select defects given the device size (3-38 mm) and the required rim of tissue, 6 to 8 mm, for deployment. Further investigation into patient selection and demonstration of improved outcomes with the ASOD compared with traditional open patch repair is still warranted. Nevertheless, the technique presented is certainly a novel, innovative solution to a challenging surgical problem.

Footnotes

Disclosures: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Shahreyar M., Akinseye O., Nayyar M., Ashraf U., Ibebuogu U.N. Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: a comprehensive review. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. November 18, 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.017. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Madsen J.C., Daggett W.M., Jr. Repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defects. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;10:117–127. doi: 10.1016/s1043-0679(98)70005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.David T.E., Dale L., Sun Z. Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: repair by endocardial patch with infarct exclusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:1315–1322. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70054-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Madou I.D., Williams A.R., Gaca J.G. Patch exclusion technique with Amplatzer septal occluder device for the treatment of post infarction ventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020:198–201. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Egbe A.C., Poterucha J.T., Rihal C.S., Taggart N.W., Cetta F., Cabalka A.K., et al. Transcatheter closure of postmyocardial infarction, iatrogenic, and postoperative ventricular septal defects: the Mayo experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:1264–1270. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JTCVS Techniques are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES