Abstract
In this work, we establish some integral inequalities involving metrics. Moreover, some applications to partial metric spaces are given. Our results are extension of previous obtained metric inequalities in the discrete case.
Keywords: integral inequalities, metric, partial metric, sub-additive, convex, log-convex, σ-Lipschitzian
1. Introduction
Metric inequalities provide powerful tools for the investigation of several problems from different branches of mathematics and sciences. In particular, from entropy and information theory (see e.g., [1,2,3]), fixed point theory (see e.g., [4,5,6,7,8]), geometry (see e.g., [9,10,11]) and telecommunication networks (see e.g., [12,13]).
In [14], Dragomir and Gosa established a polygonal type inequality and provided some applications to normed linear spaces and inner product spaces. We recall below the main result obtained in [14]. Let be a nonempty set and be a metric on (see [15]), that is, for all ,
if and only if ;
;
.
Let be a natural number, , and with . Then
(1) |
It was shown also that (1) is sharp in the following sense: there exists and with such that, if
for some , then . Inequality (1) can be interpreted as follows: If is a polygon having q vertices and M is a point in the space, then the sum of all edges and diagonals of is less than q-times the sum of the distances from M to the vertices of .
Recently, inequality (1) has been extended by some authors. In [16], Karapinar and Noorwali derived a b-metric version of (1). In [17], Aydi and Samet proved (under the above assumptions) that
where is a natural number. In [18] (see also [19]) Dragomir improved inequality (1) by proving that for all ,
(2) |
where
(3) |
In this paper, our goal is to derive continuous versions of inequality (2). In the next section, we recall some basic definitions. In Section 3, we present and prove our obtained results. Finally, in Section 4, some applications to partial metric spaces are provided.
2. Some Definitions
Let be a given function. We say that is sub-additive, if
Some examples of sub-additive functions are given below:
, , .
, .
, .
, .
, .
, .
We say that is convex, if
for all and .
We say that is log-convex, if
for all and . Notice that, if is log-convex, then it is convex, but the converse is not true in general (see [20]).
We say that is -Lipschitzian, , if
3. Results and Proofs
Let be a metric space. Let , , be a continuous mapping. Let be a function satisfying the following conditions:
-
(H1)
is continuous.
-
(H2)
.
3.1. The Case: ω Is Sub-Additive
Theorem 1.
Let be a continuous, nondecreasing, and sub-additive function. Then
(4)
Proof.
Let be fixed. Then, for every ,
Since is nondecreasing, the above inequality leads to
Due to the sub-additivity of , it holds that
Multiplying the above inequality by (notice that ) and integrating over , we obtain
(5) On the other hand, by (H2), we have
Similarly,
Combining the above inequalities, we obtain
(6) Moreover, we have
(7) On the other hand, using Fubini’s theorem and the symmetry of , we obtain
(8) Therefore, by (7) and (8), we deduce that
(9)
Finally, (4) follows from (5), (6) and (9). □
Next, we study some special cases of . In the case , , we deduce from Theorem 1 the
Corollary 1.
Let . Then
In the special case when , , we deduce from Theorem 1 the
Corollary 2.
Let . Then
In the case when , we deduce from Theorem 1 the
Corollary 3.
The following inequality holds:
3.2. The Case: ω Is Convex
Theorem 2.
Let be a nondecreasing and convex function. Then
(10)
Proof.
Fix . Since is nondecreasing, we have
Due to the convexity of , the above inequality leads to
Multiplying the above inequality by and integrating over , we obtain
(11) Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain
(12) and
(13) Finally, combining (11), (12), and (13), (10) follows. □
In the special case when , , by Theorem 2, we deduce the following result.
Corollary 4.
Let . Then
3.3. The Case: ω Is log-Convex
Theorem 3.
Let be a nondecreasing and log-convex function. Then
(14)
Proof.
Fix . Since is nondecreasing, we have
Due to the log-convexity of , the above inequality leads to
Multiplying the above inequality by and integrating over , we obtain
(15) On the other hand,
(16) Hence, using (12), (15) and (16), (14) follows. □
Consider the special case , . By Theorem 3, we obtain the
Corollary 5.
Let . Then
3.4. The Case: ω Is σ-Lipschitzian
Theorem 4.
Let be a nondecreasing and σ-Lipschitzian function, . Then
(17)
Proof.
Let be fixed. Then, for every ,
Since is nondecreasing, the above inequality leads to
On the other hand, since is -Lipschitzian, we have
Hence, it holds that
Multiplying the above inequality by and integrating over , we obtain
(18) Next, using (6), (9) and (18), we deduce that
which yields (17). □
3.5. The Case:
Consider now the case when
Then by Theorems 1–4, we deduce the following inequalities.
Corollary 6.
Let be a continuous, nondecreasing, and sub-additive function. Then
Corollary 7.
Let be a nondecreasing and convex function. Then
Corollary 8.
Let . Then
where is given by (3).
Corollary 9.
Let be a nondecreasing and log-convex function. Then
Corollary 10.
Let be a nondecreasing and σ-Lipschitzian function, . Then
4. Applications to Partial Metrics
Let be a nonempty set and be a partial metric on (see e.g., [21]), i.e., for all ,
if and only if ;
;
;
.
Let , , be a continuous mapping. Let be a function satisfying (H1) and (H2).
Corollary 11.
Let be a continuous, nondecreasing, and sub-additive function. Then
(19)
Proof.
Observe that the mapping defined by
is a metric on . Hence, applying Theorem 1 with defined as above, (19) follows. □
Similarly, by Theorems 2–4, we obtain the following inequalities.
Corollary 12.
Let be a nondecreasing and convex function. Then
Corollary 13.
Let be a nondecreasing and log-convex function. Then
Corollary 14.
Let be a nondecreasing and σ-Lipschitzian function, . Then
5. Conclusions
Metric inequalities provide powerful tools for the study of several problems from different branches of mathematics and sciences. New integral inequalities involving metrics, sub-additive, convex, log-convex, and -Lipschitzian functions are established in this work, and some applications to partial metric spaces are provided. The obtained results are continuous versions of some discrete metric inequalities obtained in [14,18,19].
Author Contributions
All authors contribute equally to this paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The third author is supported by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/4), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Cichocki A., Cruces S., Amari S.I. Log-Determinant Divergences Revisited: Alpha-Beta and Gamma Log-Det Divergences. Entropy. 2015;17:2988–3034. doi: 10.3390/e17052988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu S., Lu M., Liu G., Pan Z. A Novel Distance Metric: Generalized Relative Entropy. Entropy. 2017;19:269. doi: 10.3390/e19060269. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reeb D., Kastoryano M.J., Wolf M.M. Hilbert’s projective metric in quantum information theory. J. Math. Phys. 2011;52:082201. doi: 10.1063/1.3615729. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ansari A.H., Kumam P., Samet B. A fixed point problem with constraint inequalities via an implicit contraction. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2017;19:1145–1163. doi: 10.1007/s11784-016-0320-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jleli M., Samet B. A fixed point problem under two constraint inequalities. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2016;18:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13663-016-0504-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mitrovic Z.D., Aydi H., Noorani M.S., Qawaqneh H. The weight inequalities on Reich type theorem in b-metric spaces. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2019;19:51–57. doi: 10.22436/jmcs.019.01.07. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Simić S., Radenović S. A functional inequality. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1996;117:489–494. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Suzuki T. Basic inequality on a b-metric space and its applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017;2017:256. doi: 10.1186/s13660-017-1528-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gromov M. Metric inequalities with scalar curvature. Geom. Funct. Anal. 2018;28:645–726. doi: 10.1007/s00039-018-0453-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lángi Z. On the perimeters of simple polygons contained in a disk. Monatsh. Math. 2011;162:61–67. doi: 10.1007/s00605-010-0214-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Witsenhausen H.S. Metric inequalities and the zonoid problem. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1973;40:517–520. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0390916-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mattia S. Solving survivable two-layer network design problems by metric inequalities. Comput. Optim. Appl. 2012;51:809–834. doi: 10.1007/s10589-010-9364-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mattia S. The robust network loading problem with dynamic routing. Comp. Opt. Appl. 2013;54:619–643. doi: 10.1007/s10589-012-9500-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dragomir S.S., Gosa A.C. An inequality in metric spaces. J. Indones. Math. Soc. 2005;11:33–38. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Agarwal R.P., O’Regan D., Sahu D.R. Fixed Point Theory for Lipschitzian-Type Mappings with Applications. Volume 6 Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2009. Topological Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Karapinar E., Noorwali M. Dragomir and Gosa type inequalities on b-metric spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019;2019:29. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-1979-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aydi H., Samet B. On some metric inequalities and applications. J. Funct. Space. 2020;2020:3842879. doi: 10.1155/2020/3842879. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dragomir S.S. Refined inequalities for the distance in metric spaces. Prepr. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2020;23:119. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dragomir S.S. Inequalities for the forward distance in metric spaces. Repr. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2020;23:122. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pečarić J.E., Proschan F., Tong Y.L. Convex Functions, Partial Orderings, and Statistical Applications. Volume 187 Academic Press; Boston, MA, USA: 1992. Mathematics in Science and Engineering. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vetro C., Vetro F. Common fixed points of mappings satisfying implicit relations in partial metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2013;6:152–161. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.006.03.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.