Abstract
Purpose
Pseudoaneurysms are one of the rare complications that can be encountered after the orthognathic surgery. We are presenting a new case of pseudoaneurysm of bilateral sphenopalatine artery after Bijaw Surgery in a young male and a systematic review of all the cases in the literature emphasizing on signs and symptoms, epistaxis or bleeding episodes and treatment outcomes.
Methods
A systematic research strategy was planned according to the PRISMA guidelines, and articles were taken from 1986 to September, 2019. A total of 899 articles were selected for screening, out of which only 26 articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. These were included in the study for qualitative analysis.
Results
Most PAs were associated with Lefort I osteotomy (69.7%), followed by sagittal split osteotomy (24.24%). Average intraoperative blood was 635 ml. Maximum number of episodes of epistaxis/swelling or bleeding occurred in second week. Mean bleeding episodes were 2.58 ± 0.996. The arteries commonly affected were internal maxillary artery (42%), sphenopalatine artery (27.27%), facial artery (15.15%), descending palatine artery (12.12%), internal carotid artery (9.09%) and infraorbital artery (3.03%). Embolization was treatment of choice in 81.81% cases.
Conclusion
If a patient has recurrent epistaxis or swelling after orthognathic surgery, it is advisable to go for diagnostic imaging like angiography without any delay. In recent times, advanced techniques and expertise are readily available for early diagnosis and management of pseudoaneurysm.
Keywords: Pseudoaneurysm, Orthognathic surgery, Bleeding
Introduction
Orthognathic procedures like Lefort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) are frequently performed for the surgical correction of the dentofacial abnormalities. These procedures are relatively safe, but inevitably there may be undesirable intraoperative and postoperative complications.
The most serious and life-threatening among these complications are vascular injuries which include hemorrhage, thromobosis, arteriovenous fistulae and pseudoaneurysms [1, 2]. False aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm (PA) is abnormal dilatation of an artery resulting from breach in the vessel wall, mainly due to trauma. This leads to leakage of the blood through the wall forming an irregular, well-contained lesion; the vessel lumen and aneurysm form a direct communication of blood flow through a hole in the vessel wall. Whereas a true aneurysm is the one that involves all the three layers of the wall of the artery, i.e., intima, media and adventitia, it is an abnormal dilatation of an intact artery or vein without any history of trauma. It is thick walled with a smooth outline and has less chances of rupture. PA has higher chances of rupture than a true aneurysm of comparable size mainly due to poor wall support.
The pathophysiology for the development of a PA is multifactorial including trauma, iatrogenic causes, infection, inflammation or tumor, although trauma remains the most common causative factor [3]. The most prevalent age for a traumatic aneurysm to occur is between 20 and 40 years [4]. Three factors that determine the development of a PA are magnitude of vascular injury, rate of blood flow in the vessel and elasticity of the surrounding structures. Platelet occlusion becomes difficult if the magnitude of injury is more or the arterial blood flow is high. Elasticity of the neighboring fibrous tissue plays a major role as thick tissue usually counteracts the bleeding, leading to hematoma formation but loose fragile tissue will lead to a persistent hemorrhage [3]. This hematoma can either resolve on its own or there might be an initiation of the formation of pseudoaneurysm. If the blood flow leakage between the hematoma and laceration is maintained, it leads to liquefaction of the center. The perivascular tissue form a sac lined with tissue that resemble endothelial cells in inner layer and outer fibrous capsule. The arterial pressure leads to gradual expansion and may eventually increase in size or rupture resulting in massive bleeding as described in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowchart for pathophysiology of PA
PAs of the internal maxillary artery(IMA), sphenopalatine artery, descending palatine artery and facial artery have been reported in the literature after orthognathic surgery, which can be life-threatening [5–9] Awareness of the signs and symptoms and potential treatment outcomes by the cranio/oral maxillofacial surgeons is very important to prevent any untoward consequences. The purpose of this research was to do a systematic review of all the cases in literature with pseudoaneurysm after orthognathic surgery and to report a new case.
Case Report
A young male aged 21 years underwent maxillary impaction of 7 mm at Lefort I level and mandibular advancement by 4 mm with BSSO with correction of gummy smile. Extraction of the third molars was done 6 months prior to surgery with delayed healing of extraction socket. Preoperative hemoglobin was 12.5 g/dl with a normal hemogram and coagulogram except for a mildly raised aPTT (44 s). Surgery was performed uneventfully with an intraoperative blood loss of around 450 ml. Hemostasis was achieved and primary closure done.
On the first postoperative day (POD 1), about 3 ml of hematoma was drained from right maxillary anterior vestibular region. Patient was discharged on POD 4 with mild postoperative edema of face and no recurrence of bleeding or discharge. Then, on POD 9, patient noticed bleeding from right nostril for which nasal pack and Injection Tranexamic Acid 500 mg was administered at the local hospital and patient was referred back to our department for further management. On POD 10, there was mild bleeding from nose along with a difficulty in respiration due to the blocked nose. Endoscopy was performed immediately wherein a clot was detected in posterior nasal cavity, which could not be removed. CT angiography (CTA) was advised to locate the bleeder and the radiologist confirmed the presence of a small pseudoaneurysm in right maxillary artery (distal branch of internal maxillary artery) which was embolized through femoral artery percutaneous embolization with gel foam under local anesthesia (Fig. 2 a, b). Bleeding stopped postprocedure but nasal blockage persisted. On POD 15, patient was discharged under hemodynamically stable conditions.
Fig. 2.
a,b Digital subtraction angiography (Lateral view) demonstrating the pseudoaneurysm of right sphenopalatine artery (a) (arrow) and after embolization (b)
After two days, there was fresh episode of epistaxis and Hb decreased to 7 g/dl. The patient was readmitted and CTA was repeated. Fresh CTA suggested that the contrast filled a midline outpouching measuring 5 × 4 × 3.9 mm in size. This PA was seen in the midline, slightly in a left paramedian location within the nasal cavity, just above the posterior aspect of hard palate, likely arising from distal branch of sphenopalatine artery (Fig. 3 a, b, c).
Fig. 3.
a,b,c A small pseudoaneurysm in left paramedian nasal cavity CT angiography in axial, sagittal and coronal sections which was missing in first CTA
This was a new finding and was not appreciated on the previous CTA. Tiny PA found in the previous CTA was not filling on the fresh CTA, both in the arterial and venous phase images. Embolization was repeated (Fig. 4a,b) with an uneventful postoperative course.
Fig. 4.
a,b Complete resolution of PA after embolization
Patient was kept under observation for three more days with transfusion of 4 units of Fresh frozen plasma along with 2 units of PRBCs in view of previous delayed healing of surgical wounds and increased APTT than normal, in consultation with the hematologist. Factor 8 assay was performed to rule out coagulopathy which was found to be slightly less than normal range 54% (60–100%) but was considered normal for O positive individuals. No reoccurrence of bleeding was reported, even after 1 year of follow-up.
Research Strategy
The aim of the literature search was to identify and enlist the worldwide reported cases of pseudoaneurysms after orthognathic surgery so as to understand the age and gender predilection, vessel involved, intraoperative blood loss, time of first bleeding event after the surgery, number of bleeding events and its management.
Materials and Methods
Two researchers individually did systematic search on PubMed and Ovid using terms “pseudoaneurysm”, “false aneurysm”, “bleeding”, “orthognathic”, “lefort*’, “BSSO”, “Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy” and ”osteotomy”. We thoroughly cross checked the references of these articles and manual search was performed on Google scholar. Final selection of the articles was made based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion Criteria
Cases causing postoperative bleeding after orthognathic surgery due to pseudoaneurysm.
Details of cases available.
English language/translated articles only.
From the year 1986 to September 2019.
Exclusion Criteria
Incomplete text available.
Other causes of pseudoaneurysms like trauma.
Results
Paper Selection
A total of 883, 18, 6 articles were identified via Pubmed, Ovid and manual search, respectively. After duplication removal, 889 articles were selected for screening. Of these, only 26 articles met the exclusion and inclusion criteria which were included in the study for qualitative analysis.
Age
Mean age 25.06 ± 7.48 years with minimum age of 13 years to maximum age of 42 years.
-
(b)
Gender
A total of 33 patients in 27 studies were enrolled for our review. Out of 33 patients, 9 were females and 24 being males.
-
(c)
Procedure
Most PAs were associated with Lefort I osteotomy (69.7%), followed by sagittal split osteotomy (24.24%) and other surgical procedures (6.06%) as described in Fig. 5.
-
(d)
Intraoperative blood loss
Fig. 5.

Pie chart depicting procedures associated with PAs, Lefort I osteotomy being most commonly responsible
There were 10 patients (N = 10) who had values mentioned for the intraoperative blood loss. Average blood loss was about 635 ml.
-
(e)
First episode of epistaxis or bleeding or swelling
Figure 6 shows that the maximum episodes 47.06% (8/17) occurred in the second week followed by 29.41% in the first week.
-
(f)
Number of bleeding episodes
Fig. 6.
Bar diagram describing the first episode of epistaxis or bleeding after orthognathic surgery. 47.06% occurred in the second week
Mean bleeding episodes were 2.58 ± 0.996.
-
(g)
Artery involved
The arteries affected were internal maxillary artery (42%), sphenopalatine artery (27.27%), facial artery (15.15%), descending palatine artery (12.12%), internal carotid artery (9.09%) and infraorbital artery (3.03%) as shown in Fig. 7.
-
(h)
Average time for diagnosis of PAs
Fig. 7.
Bar diagram showing incidence of various arteries involvement in PAs in various orthognathic surgeries
Average time for CT or angiographic diagnosis of pseudoaneurysms within 2 weeks postoperatively as shown in Fig. 8.
-
(i)
Intervention
Fig. 8.
Bar diagram showing average time for diagnosis of PAs after surgery (CT/angiography)
Embolization was performed either by coils, gelform, etc. in 81.81% cases; ligation of artery was done in 15.15% cases and in one patient surgical resection of the pseudoaneurysm was done.
Discussion
From the review of the literature, it is possible to draw numerous conclusions regarding pseudoaneurysms following the orthognathic surgery. The risk of pseudoaneurysms is much lower in mandibular osteotomies than maxillary osteotomies. In concurrence, most episodes in our review were associated with Lefort I osteotomy (69.7%), followed by sagittal split osteotomy (24.24%) and other surgical procedures (6.06%).
Most reported cases of PAs of external carotid artery (ECA) appear in the superficial temporal and facial artery due to trauma-related injury, as these branches are more vulnerable due to their relatively superficial position [10–12]. In this review, sphenopalatine artery (27.27%) is the most commonly involved branch for PAs. Laskarides et al., on the other hand, pointed descending palatine artery to be most commonly injured branch [12].
The maxillary artery along with its branches is more prone to damage especially at pterygopalatine fossa region when maxillary tuberosity is osteotomized from pterygoid plates or during downfracture procedure [13, 14]. Use of curved osteotomes for pterygomaxillary disjunction is still controversial in this regard. Acebal-Banco et al. described no life-threatening hemorrhages following use of curved osteotome [15]. Precious et al. presented 500 Lefort I procedures without the use of osteotome for disjunction wherein no perioperative bleeding occurred [16]. These hemorrhagic episodes were reported more commonly in correction of syndromic maxillary hypoplasia [17].
In case of mandibular osteotomies, the internal maxillary artery is highly at risk as chances of soft tissue injury are higher when the osteotomy cut is made near sigmoid notch [14]. There are less chances of damage to facial artery even though it is close related with the osteotomy site because of subperiosteal reflection of the tissues that preserves the artery laterally [18]. One case of pseudoaneurysm of internal maxillary artery is also reported in literature following mandibular distraction osteogenesis [19].
Intraoperative blood loss and amount of blood loss in epistaxis or number of episodes is not very well documented in the literature. Only 10 patients out of 33 (30.3%) had values for intraoperative blood loss. We cannot comment on the consensus of intraoperative blood loss with formation of pseudoaneurysm. Moreover, the patient usually gets discharged and may be treated by some other hospital/doctor for emergency bleeding episode or the patient might be having mild episodes, which the patient cannot keep record of. Mean bleeding episodes were 2.58 ± 0.996 as per our review.
Detailed clinical history and physical examination is strongly recommended for diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm. Patient may present with mild to severe nasal/oropharyngeal bleeding or multiple epistaxis episode due to rupture from PAs. Many authors strongly believe that patient will present with bleeding episodes within 2 weeks of surgery [20]. Avealar stated that PAS usually occurs 3 days to 8 months after the osteotomy [21]. Ideally, as stated by Lanigan in 1990, any patient who presents with first episode of epistaxis after second postoperative week or who experiences recurrent significant hemorrhage after orthognathic surgery, should be investigated by angiography to rule out pseudoaneurysm. [14]
The initial absence of pulsation in the mass is a late phenomenon as it does not occur until after liquefaction of the hematoma. A bruit/thrill is common in aneurysm, but the bruit is localized and is generally heard during systole [22]. The lesion is usually soft on palpation, pulsatile and has auditory machinery murmur. This bruit/thrill can be absent in deep lesions especially deep maxillary artery branches, in which palpation becomes difficult although the patient can feel the pulsations [23]. Use of stethoscope should be preferred. Aspiration of the suspicious lesions should be avoided as it can precipitate bleeding.
Differential diagnosis of a pseudoaneurysm include hematoma, abscess, cyst, inflamed lymph node, juvenile nasoangiofibroma and arteriovenous fistula. A detailed history, recent onset, pulsations and epistaxis episodes make pseudoaneurysm as a likely fit.
Radiographs can be of little use in the diagnosis mainly when the wall has become calcified. Angiography and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) are the preferred radiographic modalities used for diagnosis. CECT was considered as a diagnostic tool but it can be of less value when the size of the lesion is small. Doppler USG can also be used for fast screening when the pathology is superficial. The main advantage, is its capacity to diagnose turbulent fluid with 95% accuracy [24]. An angiogram is better enabled for identifying the vascular injury more quickly and the exact location can be accurately identified allowing precise treatment.
Airway patency in these patients should be the foremost concern as distress from continuous bleeding can further worsen the situation. A combination of conservative and surgical treatment should be initiated to tackle such life-threatening bleeds. Anterior/posterior nasal packing, direct pressure or topical hemostatic agents can be used in a hemodynamically stable patient. Controlling blood pressure and administering intravenous fluids along with blood products are required for an unstable patient.
If PA is diagnosed via angiography, preferred treatment is trans-catheter embolization. In trained hands, Digital subtraction angiography is a safe procedure with a 0.03% mortality and 1.73% morbidity rate which is not outweighed by the risk of uncontrolled bleeding [25, 26]. Surgery can be used to resect the aneurysms or direct ligation of the artery can also performed [6, 8, 9, 27]. Embolization is always advantageous over surgical intervention because it can spare more proximal vessels, and we can selectively embolize the distal bleeding source. Moreover, it has an additional advantage of maintaining the blood supply of the osteotomized segments preventing aseptic necrosis which is particularly important following orthognathic surgery. Substances used in embolization include gelfoam, Gianturco coils, stainless steel coils with gelatin, detachable balloons and various chemicals like PVA, N-butayl cyanoacrylate, etc. [5, 18, 23, 26, 27]. Detachable platinum coils can be easily used to obliterate a large blood vessel without causing adverse effects. These have a rapid hemostatic effect and can be removed readily in case of an incorrect placement [28]. Embolization is contraindicated in patients with allergy to contrast media or severe carotid ateromatosis [7].
More aggressive treatment modalities like trans-antral ligation of IMA become very difficult because of altered anatomy after surgery, postsurgical arterial retraction wherein a tiny bleeding point is often very difficult to spot. Proximal ligation of IMA or ECA may allow collateral filling of distant PA and re-bleeding [26]. Ligation of ECA has been successfully performed by Lanignand 1983 [29]. Surgical excision is the last resort which is not advised these days although Weber et al. 1997 stated the complete excision of pseudoaneurysm along with ligation of both ends of artery as recommended treatment [30].
Due to excessive collateral supply in head and neck region, reoccurrence of the lesion is high as stated by Akai et al. 1994 [31].
Limitation
All the articles in the review are case reports or case series or retrospective studies. Prospective data are required for even minor episodes of epistaxis/bleeding (Table 1).
Table 1.
Literature review of all the data available regarding PAs after orthognathic surgery
| Author | Age in years | Sex | Procedure | Intraoperative blood loss | First episode of bleeding/epistaxis | Number of bleeding episodes | Artery | Duration of development PAs (diagnosis) | Intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemming et al. 1987 [5] | 29 | Female | Lefort I | – | 11th day postoperative | 4 | Sphenopalatine artery | 2 weeks | Gianturco coil |
| Clark et al. 1987[22] | 15 | Male | Subcondylar osteotomy | – | – | – | Maxillary artery | 9 weeks | 3 mm gianturco coil |
| Solomons and Blumgart 1988 [32] | 20 | Male | Lefort I | – | – | – | Maxillary artery | 1 month | Large gel foam followed by 3 mm gianturco coil |
| Lanigan et al. 1991 [6] |
13 20 29 |
Female Female Male |
Lefort I Lefort I Lefort I |
– <500 ml 1000 ml |
6 weeks 3 weeks 6 days |
– 3 2 |
Sphenopalatine artery Sphenopalatine artery Maxillary artery |
6 weeks 7 weeks 10 days |
Direct ligation of artery Direct ligation of artery Embolization |
| Lustbader DP et al. 1991 [7] | 17 | Male | Lefort I | – | – | – | Maxillary artery | 12 days | Three guide wires |
| Yin 1994 [8] | 24 | Male | Sagittal osteotomy | – | – | – | Maxillary artery | During surgery | Multiple ligations |
|
Albernaz 1995 [33] |
30 | Female | Lefort I | – | – | – | Descending palatine artery | 22 days | 50 pieces of polyvinyl acrylate |
| Rogers 1995 [34] | 23 | Male | High lefort I | – | – | – | Maxillary artery | 3 days | Fiber coils |
|
Tiner BD, 1997 [9] |
32 35 |
Male Male |
Lefort I Lefort I |
– – |
2 weeks 8 days |
3 1 |
Descending palatine artery Internal maxillary artery/internal carotid artery Infraorbital artery |
1 month 3 months 8 days |
Coils surgical resection Ligature clips |
| Bardley et al. 2002 [35] | 17 | Male | Lefort I | – | – | – | Maxillary artery | 8 months | COIL |
| Procorpio 2003 [36] |
37 24 |
Male Male |
Lefort I Lefort I |
– – |
– – |
– – |
Sphenopalatine artery Sphenopalatine artery |
63 days 10 days |
Platinum coils Platinum coils |
| Fernandez preito 2005 [26] | 26 | Female | Lefort I | – | 3 weeks | 2 | Descending palatine artery | 1 month | Embolization with microcoils |
| Manafi 2007 [10] | 42 | Female | SSRO | – | 10 days | 3 | Maxillary artery | 28 days | Embolization with coils |
| Silva 2007[3] | 20 | Male | SSRO | 1000 ml | – | – | Maxillary artery | 6 weeks | Embolization with coils |
| Elton 2007 [37] | 41 | Female | Subcondylar osteotomy | – | – | – | Maxillary artery | 5 years | Ligation of ECA |
| Aveolar RL, 2010 [21] | 20 | Male | Lefort I | 500 ml | 1 day prior to report | 1 |
Maxillary artery (sphenopalatine artery) |
9 weeks | Selective catheterism of sphenopalatine artery and implantation of 7 platinum microcoils |
| Chepla 2010 [38] | 17 | Female | Lefort I | – | 7 days | – | Internal maxillary artery | 14 days | Embolization with microcoils |
| Madani 2010 [18] | 22 | Male | SSRO and facial trauma | 1000 ml | – | – | Facial artery | 4 weeks | Embolization with coils |
| Krishan, 2011 [1] | 33 | Male | Lefort I | – | – | – | Internal carotid artery | 8 days | Coil embolization |
| Precious DS, 2012 [16] |
32 26 20 |
Male Male Male |
SSRO SSRO SSRO |
– 150 ml 1000 ml |
2 weeks 1 weeks 1 week |
– – |
Facial artery Facial artery Facial artery |
3 weeks 5 weeks 1 week |
Coil embolization Coil embolization Embolization |
| Kim 2013 [39] | 31 | Male | Lefort I | – | – | – | Sphenopalatine artery | 2 weeks | Embolization |
| Hacrin Bay 2013 [40] | 18 | Male | Lefort I | – | – | – | Internal carotid artery | 2 days | CA stent reconstruction and PA coil obliteration |
| HW Jo 2013 [41] | 19 | Male | SSRO | – | – | – | Facial artery | 3 weeks | Embolization with histoacryl |
| Niazi, 2018 [42] | – | – | Lefort I | – | 1 week | – | Descending palatine artery | 1 week | Coils |
| Bykowski et al. 2018 [43] | 27 | Male | Lefort I | 600 ml | 2nd week | 4 | Maxillary artery | 36 days | Coil embolization |
| Laskarides, 2018 | 22 | Female | Lefort I | <150 CC | 2nd week | >3 | Sphenopalatine artery | 21 days | Onyx mediated embolization |
| Our report, 2019 | 21 | Male | Lefort I | 450 ml |
8 days 17 days |
3 2 |
Distal branch of maxillary artery Sphenopalatine artery |
10 days 17 days |
Embolization with gelfoam Embolization with gelfoam |
Conclusion
If a patient has recurrent epistaxis or swelling after orthognathic surgery, it is advisable to go for diagnostic imaging like angiography without any delay. In recent times, advanced techniques and expertise are readily available for early diagnosis and management of pseudoaneurysm.
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank the patient for being on regular follow-up.
Funding
No sources of support in the form of grants
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Amanjot Kaur, Email: amanjotkaur1992@yahoo.com.
Manpreet Singh, Email: manpreetping@gmail.com.
Vidya Rattan, Email: drvidyarattan@gmail.com.
Sachin Rai, Email: drraisachin@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Krishnan DG, Alto DL, Waisath TC, et al. Internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after le fort I osteotomy: report of a case and its management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:242–245. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baddour HM, Watson J, Erwin BJ. Injuries to the internal carotid artery following orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;3:215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Silva AC, et al. Pseudoaneurysm of a branch of the maxillary artery following mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: case report and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1807–1816. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peick AL, Nichols WK, Curtis JJ, et al. Aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms of the superficial temporal artery caused by trauma. J Vasc Surg. 1988;8:606–610. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(88)90312-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hemmig SB, Johnson RS, Ferraro N. Management of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm of the sphenopalatine artery following a Le Fort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:533–536. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(87)80016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lanigan DT, Hey JV, West RA. Major vascular complications of orthognathic surgery: false aneurysms and arteriovenous fistulas following orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:571. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90337-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lustbader DP, Schwartz MH, Zito J, et al. The use of percutaneous transcatheter embolization to control postoperative bleeding following Le Fort I osteotomy: report of three cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:426–431. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90386-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yin NT. Hemorrhage of the initial part of the internal maxillary artery treated by multiple ligations: report of four cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52:1066–1071. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90179-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tiner BD, Sickels V. Schmitz: life-threatening, delayed hemorrhage after Le Fort I osteotomy requiring surgical intervention: report of two cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:91–93. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90456-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manafi A, Ghenaati H, Dezham F, et al. Massive repeated nose bleeding after bimaxillary osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18:1491–4193. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31809ed9f7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Newman F, et al. Late vascular complication associated with panfacial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2374–2377. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laskarides C, Malek AM. Pseudoaneurysm as a complication of orthognathic surgery: a case report. World J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;1:1003. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Turvey TA, Fonseca RJ. The anatomy of the internal maxillary artery in the pterygopalatine fossa: its relationship to maxillary surgery. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:92–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lanigan DT, Hey JH, West RA. Major vascular complications of orthognathic surgery: haemorrhage associated with Le Fort I osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:561–573. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80468-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Acebal-Bianco F, Vuylsteke PL, Mommaerts MY, et al. Perioperative complications in corrective facial orthopedic surgery: a 5-year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(7):754–760. doi: 10.1053/joms.2000.7874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Precious DS, Powell JE, Tuzuner AM, et al. False aneurysms after sagittal split ramus osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:e58–e65. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bendor-Samuel Richard, Chen YR, Chen, PK, et al. Unusual complications of the Le Fort I osteotomy. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1289–1296. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199511000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Madani M, Veznedaroglu E, Pazoki A, et al. Pseudoaneurysm of the facial artery as a late complication of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and facial trauma. Oral Surg Oral. 2010;110(5):579–584. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pandyan DA, et al. Pseudoaneurysm of internal maxillary artery—an untold complication following distraction osteogenesis—a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:605.e1–605.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Politis C. Life-threatening haemorrhage after 750 Le Fort I osteotomies and 376 SARPE procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:702–708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Avelar RL, Goelzer JG, Becker OE, et al. Embolization of pseudoaneurysm of the internal maxillary artery after orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1764–1768. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f40393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Clark R, Lew D, Giyanani VL, Gerlock A. False aneurysm complicating orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45(1):57–59. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90087-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Steel BJ, et al. Unusual and rare complications of orthognathic surgery: a literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;70(7):1678–1691. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mahmoud MZ, Al-Saadi M, Abuderman A, Alzimami KS, Alkhorayef M, Almagli B, Sulieman A. “To-and-fro” waveform in the diagnosis of arterial pseudoaneurysms. World J Radiol. 2015;7(5):89–99. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i5.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sclafani AP, et al. Angiography and transcatheter arterial embolization of vascular injuries of the face and neck. The Laryngoscope. 1996;106(2):168–173. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199602000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fernandez-Prieto A, Garcia-Raya P, Burgueno M, et al. Endovascular treatment of a pseudoaneurysm of the descending palatine artery after orthognathic surgery: technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:321–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Krempl GA, Noorily AD. Pseudoaneurysm of the descending palatine artery presenting as epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114:453–456. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(96)70217-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oh JS, Kim SG, Moon SY. Massive hemorrhage following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:895–898. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lanigan DT, West RA. Management of postoperative haemorrhage following the Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42:367–375. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(84)80008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Weber R, Keerl R, Hendus J, et al. The emergency: traumatic aneurysm in the area of the head-neck. Laryngorhinootologie. 1993;72:86–90. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Akai T, Kuwayama N, Endo S, Takaku A. Treatment of traumatic arteriovenous fistula with embolization andsurgica l excision—a case report. J Cranio-Maxillo-Fac Surg. 1994;22:147–150. doi: 10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80380-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Solomons NB, Blumgart R. Severe late-onset epistaxis following Le Fort I osteotomy: angiographic localization and embolization. J Laryngol Otol. 1988;102:260–263. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100104670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Albernaz VS, Tomsick TA. Embolization of arteriovenous fistulae of the maxillary artery after Le Fort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(2):208–210. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90405-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rogers SN, Patel M, Beirne JC, et al. Traumatic aneurysm of the maxillary artery the role of interventional radiology. A report of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24(5):336–339. doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80485-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bradley JP, Elahi M, Kawamoto HK. Delayed presentation of pseudoaneurysm after Le Fort I osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2002;13:746. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200211000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Procopio O, Fusetti S, Liessi G, et al. False aneurysm of the sphenopalatine artery after a Le Fort I osteotomy: report of 2 cases. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2003;61:520. doi: 10.1053/joms.2003.50100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Elton VJ, Turnbull IW, Foster ME. An overview of the management of pseudoaneurysm of the maxillary artery: a report of a case following mandibular subcondylar osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chepla KJ, Totonchi A, Hsu DP, et al. Maxillary artery pseudoaneurysm after Le Fort I osteotomy: treatment using transcatheter arterial embolization. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1079–1081. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e20693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim YW, Baek MJ, Kim HD, et al. Massive epistaxis due to pseudoaneurysm of the sphenopalatine artery: a rare post-operative complication of orthognathic surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127:610–613. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113000819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hacein-Bey L, Blazun JM, Jackson RF. Carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after orthognathic surgery causing lower cranial nerve palsies: endovascular repair. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:1948–1955. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jo HW, Kim YS, Knag DH, et al. Pseudoaneurysm of the facial artery occurred after mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;17:151–154. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0339-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Niazi MH, El-Ghanem M, Al-Mufti F, et al. Endovascular management of epistaxis secondary to dissecting pseudoaneurysm of the descending palatine artery following orthognathic surgery. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2018;10(2):41–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bykowski MR, Hill A, Garland C, et al. Ruptured pseudoaneurysm of the maxillary artery and its branches following Le Fort I osteotomy: evidence-based guidelines. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(4):998–1001. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







