Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Medicine and Surgery logoLink to Annals of Medicine and Surgery
. 2021 Jul 14;68:102558. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102558

Development of a novel atrophic non-union model in rabbits: A preliminary study

Khan Sharun 1,∗, Abhijit M Pawde 1,∗∗, Amitha Banu S 1, KM Manjusha 1, E Kalaiselvan 1, Rohit Kumar 1, Prakash Kinjavdekar 1, Amarpal 1
PMCID: PMC8313836  PMID: 34336194

Abstract

Background and aim

The currently available atrophic non-union models rely on wide segmental excision of bone diaphysis to impede the process of healing but lack resemblance to the clinical scenario. The present study focused on developing an in vivo model of atrophic non-union fracture in rabbit radius that can replicate the clinical scenario.

Materials and methods

The atrophic non-union fracture model was developed by creating a 10 mm segmental bone defect in the radial diaphysis of five adult New Zealand White rabbits. The periosteum (2 mm) of the cut bone ends was cauterized using electrocautery to induce atrophy. Atrophic non-union was confirmed using radiographic and histologic evaluations on 30th postoperative day.

Results

The radiographic signs of healing were completely absent in all the rabbits on 30th postoperative day, indicating inert bone ends. Histological findings further confirmed the presence of inert bone ends, indicating the development of atrophic non-union.

Conclusion

The combination of the segmental bone defect, electrocautery induced thermal damage of bone end periosteum, and delayed treatment can induce the development of atrophic non-union fracture model in rabbits that can replicate the clinical scenario.

Keywords: New Zealand White rabbits, Rabbit, Radius, Non-union model, Atrophic non-union model

Highlights

  • •

    In vivo model of atrophic non-union fracture in rabbit radius was developed that can replicate the clinical scenario.

  • •

    Radiographic and histological findings confirmed the presence of inert bone ends.

  • •

    Combination of segmental bone defect, electrocautery induced thermal damage, and delayed treatment can induce atrophic non-union fracture.

1. Introduction

Fracture healing generally proceeds in an orderly fashion under an appropriate biological and mechanical environment, and consequently, most fractures heal well. However, complications like osteomyelitis, implant loosening, and fracture instability may result in a non-union fracture [1]. Approximately 5–10% of fractures fail to heal in human patients, resulting in fracture non-union [2]. Fracture non-union is a pathological condition in which the ends of the fractured bone cannot unite without any surgical or non-surgical intervention [3]. Some of the local factors that have a significant role in the development of non-union include infection, biomechanical instability, iatrogenic factors, decreased vascularity, poor bone fragment contact, and high magnitude of injury [4]. The treatment of fractures that develop non-union may require numerous interventions with associated morbidity and financial costs [5].

Non-union of the radius-ulna fractures commonly results due to instability and macro-movement at the fracture site resulting mainly from stabilization with external coaptation, use of intramedullary pins with inadequate rotational and axial stability, use of external skeletal fixator with improper frame and pin size, loose cerclage wire that has migrated into the fracture site and plates and screws that are inadequately sized for the patient [6]. According to Weber and Cech (1976), fracture non-unions are classified into two broad groups, hypertrophic and atrophic non-unions, based on the radiographic appearance, correlated with its etiology [7]. In hypertrophic non-union, there will be normal callus tissue, but bony bridging will be absent. While in the case of atrophic non-unions, there will be a complete absence of relevant callus tissue. Furthermore, hypertrophic non-union occurs when there is a lack of fracture stability, while atrophic non-union can occur due to several causes [8].

The mechanism responsible for the development of atrophic non-union is not well understood. The lack of suitable animal models significantly limits studies investigating the formation of atrophic non-union and their management. Atrophic non-union models have been created by producing either extensive segmental bone excision or by implanting inert materials within bone defects to impede the normal healing processes [9]. The majority of the non-union models studied for evaluating bone healing used the principle of the critical-sized defect (CSD). It involved creating a large segmental defect beyond the regenerative capacity of the bone [10]. However, such non-union models seemed to be well vascularized at the defect site thereby cannot be used to mimic clinical scenario. Thus, instead of implanting the biomaterials into the fresh-cut segmental defect, delaying the implantation procedure can simulate the clinical scenario where the bone edges become inert and lack vascularization.

Therefore, the present study was conducted to develop an in vivo model of atrophic non-union fracture in the radius bone of New Zealand White rabbits that can replicate the clinical scenario.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Ethical approval

All experimental protocols used in the study were according to the international guidelines and were approved by the Institute Animal Ethics Committee, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute.

2.2. Experimental animals

Five clinically healthy adult New Zealand White rabbits (n = 5, three male and two female) of seven to eight months of age were used in the study. The rabbits had an average body weight of 2.04 ± 0.09 kg. They were housed in individual steel cages, fed a standard diet (18% crude protein and 2700 kcal digestible energy), and provided ad libitum access to drinking water. The rabbits were also given an acclimatization period of 15 days before initiation of the study. The experimental animals were provided with humane care, and procedures were performed according to National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH Publications, eighth edition, 2011).

2.3. Preparation of atrophic non-union model in rabbit

The rabbits were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of xylazine hydrochloride (Xylaxin, Indian Immunologicals Ltd., India) at a dose rate of 6 mg/kg body weight followed by ketamine hydrochloride (Aneket, Neon Laboratories Ltd., India) at the dose rate of 60 mg/kg body weight in the thigh muscles [11]. The entire forelimb of the rabbit was shaved and painted with 10% povidone-iodine (Betadine, Win-Medicare Pvt. Ltd., India). The rabbits were restrained in lateral recumbency on a surgical table. A three cm long skin incision was made on the medial aspect of the limb in between the elbow and carpal joint. The muscle layers were separated using fine artery forceps to visualize the radius bone. A segmental bone defect of 10 mm length was created in the central diaphysis of the radius bone using an orthopedic saw (Fig. 1a and b). The periosteum was cauterized using electrocautery (Digital 400, Larsen & Toubro Ltd., India) circumferentially for a distance of 2 mm on each end of the remaining proximal and distal bone segments (Fig. 1c). Care was taken to protect the muscle and other surrounding soft tissues around the fracture site.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Segmental bone defect of 10 mm length was created in the central diaphysis of the radius bone. (b) The edges of the bone defect after removing the cut fragment. (c) Cauterization of the periosteum using electrocautery circumferentially for a distance of 2 mm on the remaining proximal and distal bone ends.

The muscle layers and skin were closed in a routine manner. The defect produced was left untreated for a period of 30 days. Post-operatively, the rabbits were treated with antibiotic enrofloxacin (Quinintas, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India) at the dose of 5 mg/kg body weight IM q24 h for five days and anti-inflammatory agent meloxicam (Melonex, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India) at the dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight IM q24 h for three days. Immediately after the surgery, an external bamboo splint was applied to the test limb to provide good immobilization and prevent excessive weight-bearing. The confirmation of non-union was done based on radiographic findings after 30 days.

2.4. Radiographic evaluation of the bone defect healing

Atrophic non-union was confirmed based on the findings of the radiographic examination. Postoperative radiographs of the defect site (mediolateral view) were made immediately after surgery and subsequently on the 30th postoperative days using standard exposure factors (14 mAs, 50 kVp, and 85 cm FFD). The radiographs were evaluated for the degree of new bone formation, the extent of callus formed, radiographic density, reduction in the defect size, and the signs of remodeling.

2.5. Histological evaluation

For histological evaluation, one of the rabbits was sacrificed on the 30th postoperative day. The test bone was collected, and a three cm long piece of the radius that included the defect site at the middle and normal bones on both sides was cut using a hack saw. The bone specimens were washed and then fixed using 10% formalin for a period of 2–3 days. The specimens were then decalcified by using Goodling and Stewart's fluid [12]. The solution was stirred daily and changed once every three days. The bone samples were checked regularly for the signs of complete decalcification by observing different parameters like flexibility, transparency, and pin penetrability. The decalcified bone was further processed by paraffin embedding technique to obtain 4-μm thick paraffin sections (longitudinal sections). The bone sections were stained using Haematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) to evaluate the healing status of the bone [13].

3. Results

3.1. Clinical signs

None of the rabbits exhibited abnormal behavior/activity during the postoperative period except that they did not bear weight on the affected limb (right forelimb). Application of splints also caused inconvenience and improper weight-bearing on the affected limb. However, regular weight-bearing was observed after 10–14 days when the external bamboo splint was removed. The surgical wound in all the rabbits healed without any complications.

3.2. Radiographic observations

Radiographic examination was performed on the day of surgery and on day 30 to evaluate the healing process and progression of atrophic changes in the bone edges. The radiolucent area at the mid-diaphysis was visible on day 0, representing the 10 mm segmental defect. The rabbit radius measured a mean diameter of 3.02 ± 0.13 mm (range 2.8 mm–3.1 mm). In all the experimental rabbits, signs of new bone formation were completely absent, indicating inert bone ends. Furthermore, radiographic features such as end shortening and reduced bone density were also evident in all rabbits at the bony ends on day 30, indicative of atrophic non-union fracture. Fig. 2 illustrates the comparative analysis of the day 0 and day 30 radiographs of the right radius (mediolateral view).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Mediolateral radiographs of the rabbit showing the status of bone defect at (a) day 0 and (b) day 30. Radiographic features on day 30 include reduced bone density and bone end shortening (arrows).

3.3. Histological observations

The histological picture of the bony ends indicated atrophic changes in the longitudinal section of radius on day 30 (Fig. 3). The protocol used in this study successfully prevented the end-to-end union of the radius bone. Instead, the gap defect was found to be filled with fibrous tissue. The absence of osteocytes in the diaphysis immediately adjacent to the bony ends indicated inertness. Therefore, the histopathological findings confirmed the formation of atrophic non-union fractures.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Photomicrograph showing the histological picture of the bony end (arrows) showing atrophic changes in the longitudinal section of the radius on day 30 (H & E stain; x4).

4. Discussion

In hypertrophic non-union, callus formation is abundant due to its good biological activity. The fracture cannot heal properly due to a lack of mechanical stability [14]. Compared to hypertrophic non-union, atrophic non-union is a pathological condition that occurs from biological impairment of healing characterized by the absence of the callus at the fracture ends, making it rounded and sclerotic [15]. Treatment of non-union is considered a difficult task and is associated with a high financial impact [8]. Several novel therapeutic strategies like extracorporeal shock wave therapies are available that mainly target hypertrophic non-unions. Such therapies are less effective in managing atrophic non-unions [16].

The disease model of atrophic non-union should accurately reflect the abnormal physiological process of fracture healing. Selecting a suitable non-union model should involve specific considerations like animal species, types of fixations, and mode of generation of the atrophic non-union. Small animals are widely used in studies of fracture healing due to several obvious advantages over large animals that include lower maintenance costs, shorter experimental time, and the possibility of using many animals. The process of fracture healing has been studied extensively in small animals such as mice and rats to understand the same process in human beings [17,18]. Atrophic non-unions can be confirmed from the typical histological and radiological features. The characteristic findings include the absence of fracture bridging, the absence of callus formation, an abundance of fibrous tissue at the fracture gap, and the rounding of bone ends [19].

The actual meaning of atrophic non-unions is described as the presence of non-reactive and metabolically inactive bony ends. Research on non-unions is greatly limited by the lack of an ideal animal model. Among different animal models, the rabbit model is considered a perfect choice for studies involving tissue engineering of cartilage, bone, tendon, and skin [20]. It is mainly because of the advantages like easy standardization of experimental conditions, less expensive, and superior bone turnover rate [21]. It also has a well-defined cortical bone Haversian system, and the simulation of remodeling after an injury is more similar to that of other large animals [22]. Over the years, several non-union models have been developed that closely resemble the clinical scenario. Some of which include segmental bone excision [23,24], external skeletal fixation with periosteal stripping [9], bone plating with periosteal stripping [25,26], sealing of the marrow cavity [27], removal of the bone marrow [28], and by placing a spacer in the defects to create a delay in bone union [29]. The successful creation of non-union in the animal model depends largely on the size of the bone defect. The length of CSD in the rabbit radius can also be calculated by formula 2n+1, where n is the diameter of the radius bone in mm [10]. The defect made in the present study was approximately three times greater than the diameter of the radius bone, thereby conforming to the definition of CSD. Even though previous studies have identified that radial osteotomy defects up to 15 mm can be healed with the help of suitable therapeutic interventions [30], we firmly believe that the length of defect used in our study (10 mm) can be further decreased without affecting the atrophic non-union formation. In addition to the osteotomy, the fracture ends have to be de-vascularized to promote the formation of non-union. This can be done by cauterizing the periosteum at the fracture ends [31]. Kokubu et al. (2003) cauterized 2 mm of the periosteum on each side of the fractured femur in an atrophic non-union rat model [32]. Therefore, we have also cauterized 2 mm of the periosteum on the remaining proximal and distal bone ends. Cauterization can simulate clinical atrophic union as it can promote cortical necrosis [33].

In the case of rats, muscle interposition was performed into the fracture site to induce the formation of non-union [34]. Damaging both periosteum and endosteum is another strategy that has been used widely in rats to induce non-union [35,36]. Similarly, extensive resection of periosteum and bone marrow is another method of inducing an atrophic non-union model in rat femur [37]. The non-union model can also be created in mice using a pin-clip fixation technique [19]. However, most of these models did not produce an accurate representation of the atrophic non-union.

The majority of the non-union models used for evaluating bone healing use the principle of CSD and are made by creating a large segmental defect beyond the regenerative capacity of the bone. It is followed by implanting suitable biomaterials into the freshly cut CSD [10]. Those defects that cannot heal completely within the lifetime of the animal without any additional therapeutic interventions are defined as CSD [38]. Radius is the ideal bone in rabbits that can be used for evaluating segmental bone defect due to its several privileges: it is a tubular bone that enables easy creation of defect, radiographical and histopathological evaluations are easy; simplified surgical procedure, no need for additional fixations since ulna provides support and stability [39].

In the present study, atrophic non-union fracture was created in the radius bone by combining segmental bone defect, periosteal damage using electrocautery, and delayed treatment. The fracture site was filled with fibrous tissue, which was evident in the histopathological investigation performed on day 30. This was in accordance with the findings of Onishi et al. (2020) [37]. We have developed an atrophic non-union model in rabbits that mimics the clinical scenario of non-unions. Atrophic non-union was confirmed in our study on day 30 due to the lack of fracture bridging, absence of callus formation, and the presence of abundant fibrous tissue in the bone defect. One of the major advantages of this model is the lack of fracture fixing equipment such as bone plates [25,26], external skeletal fixator [9], K-wire [37], and pin-clip fixator [19] for creating non-union. The segmental bone defect in the radius was already fixed and stabilized due to the adjacent ulna. This allowed full weight-bearing in the rabbits and prevented the displacement of fracture ends. The lack of proper immobilization would have probably led to the development of pseudarthrosis [28].

5. Conclusion

The combination of the segmental bone defect, electrocautery-induced thermal damage of bone end periosteum, and delayed treatment can induce atrophic non-union fracture of radius in the rabbit model that can replicate the clinical scenario. However, further studies are required to standardize the length of segmental bone defect and the optimum duration of the delay necessary to induce successful atrophic non-union in rabbit radius.

Ethical approval

All the methods and experimental protocols used in this study were approved by the Institute Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Trail registry number

Not applicable (no human study).

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

Research Registration Unique Identifying Number (UIN)

Name of the registry: Not applicable

Unique Identifying number or registration ID: Not applicable

Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): Not applicable

Author contribution

KS, and AMP were involved in conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, writing the article. ABS, KMM and EK participated in the study and analysis. RK, PK, and Amarpal critically revised the manuscript. All authors certifies that he/she has made a direct and substantial contribution to the work reported in the manuscript and have approved the final version of the manuscript

Data statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Funding

No substantial funding to be stated.

Guarantor

Dr. Abhijit M Pawde, MVSc., PhD, Division of Surgery, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Declaration of competing interest

All authors declare that there exist no commercial or financial relationships that could, in any way, lead to a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. K. P. Singh, Joint Director, Centre for Animal Disease Research and Diagnosis (CADRAD), ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, for his help in the histopathological investigation. The authors are also thankful to the Director, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, India, and the All-India Network Program on Diagnostic Imaging and Management of Surgical Conditions in Animals (AINP-DIMSCA) for providing the necessary research facilities to carry out this work.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102558.

Contributor Information

Khan Sharun, Email: sharunkhansk@gmail.com, sharunkhan@ivri.res.in.

Abhijit M. Pawde, Email: abhimp@rediffmail.com.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (280.6KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Millis D.L., Jackson A.M. WB Saunders; Philadelphia, PA: 2003. Delayed Unions, Non-unions, and Malunions. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery; pp. 1849–1861. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zura R., Xiong Z., Einhorn T., Watson J.T., Ostrum R.F., Prayson M.J., Della Rocca G.J., Mehta S., McKinley T., Wang Z., Steen R.G. Epidemiology of fracture non-union in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg. 2016 Nov 16;151(11) doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2775. Epub 2016 Nov 16. PMID: 27603155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhandari M., Guyatt G.H., Swiontkowski M.F., Tornetta P., 3rd, Sprague S., Schemitsch E.H. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2002 Sep;16(8):562–566. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200209000-00004. PMID: 12352564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perumal V., Roberts C.S. Factors contributing to non-union of fractures. Curr. Orthop. 2007;21(4):258–261. doi: 10.1016/j.cuor.2007.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schwartz A.V., Garnero P., Hillier T.A., Sellmeyer D.E., Strotmeyer E.S., Feingold K.R., Resnick H.E., Tylavsky F.A., Black D.M., Cummings S.R., Harris T.B., Bauer D.C., Health Aging, and Body Composition Study. Pentosidine and increased fracture risk in older adults with type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009 Jul;94(7):2380–2386. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2498. Epub 2009 Apr 21. PMID: 19383780; PMCID: PMC2708944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fossum T.W. fourth ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013. Small Animal Surgery Textbook-E-Book; p. 1640. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weber B., Cech O. Hans Huber Medical Publisher; Berne: 1976. Pseudoarthrosis: Pathology, Biomechanics, Therapy, Results. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hak D.J., Fitzpatrick D., Bishop J.A., Marsh J.L., Tilp S., Schnettler R., Simpson H., Alt V. Delayed union and nonunions: epidemiology, clinical issues, and financial aspects. Injury. 2014 Jun;45(Suppl 2):S3–S7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.002. PMID: 24857025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brownlow H.C., Simpson A.H. Metabolic activity of a new atrophic non-union model in rabbits. J. Orthop. Res. 2000 May;18(3):438–442. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100180316.PMID:10937631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zamani Mazdeh D., Mirshokraei P., Emami M., Mirshahi A., Karimi I. 17β-estradiol improves the efficacy of exploited autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in non-union radial defect healing: a rabbit model. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018 Jun;118:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.12.024. Epub 2017 Dec 28. PMID: 29334646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sharun K., Pawde A.M., Kumar R., Kalaiselvan E., Kinjavdekar P., Dhama K., Pal A. Standardization and characterization of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction from New Zealand white rabbits for bone tissue engineering. Vet. World. 2021 Feb;14(2):508–514. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.508-514. Epub 2021 Feb 25. PMID: 33776318; PMCID: PMC7994125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Culling C.F.A. Butter Worth Co. Ltd.; London, England: 1963. Handbook of Histopathological Techniques. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Luna L.G. third ed. McGraw-Hill Company; New York: 1968. Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shon O.J., Lee M.H., Ahn H.S. Non-operative treatment of nonunion. J. Korean Fract. Soc. 2014;27(4):338–347. doi: 10.12671/jkfs.2014.27.4.338. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mills L.A., Simpson A.H. In vivo models of bone repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jul;94(7):865–874. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B7.27370.PMID:22733938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zelle B.A., Gollwitzer H., Zlowodzki M., Bühren V. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: current evidence. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2010 Mar;24(Suppl 1):S66–S70. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181cad510. PMID: 20182240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Urist M.R., McLean F.C. Bone repairs in rats with multiple fractures. Am. J. Surg. 1950 Nov 15;80(6):685–695. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(50)90593-9. PMID: 14790110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nunamaker D.M. Experimental models of fracture repair. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998 Oct;(355 Suppl):S56–S65. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00007. PMID: 9917626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Garcia P., Holstein J.H., Maier S., Schaumlöffel H., Al-Marrawi F., Hannig M., Pohlemann T., Menger M.D. Development of a reliable non-union model in mice. J. Surg. Res. 2008 Jun 1;147(1):84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.09.013. Epub 2007 Oct 29. PMID: 18061614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lapi S., Nocchi F., Lamanna R., Passeri S., Iorio M., Paolicchi A., Urciuoli P., Coli A., Abramo F., Miragliotta V., Giannessi E., Stornelli M.R., Vanacore R., Stampacchia G., Pisani G., Borghetti L., Scatena F. Different media and supplements modulate the clonogenic and expansion properties of rabbit bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Res. Notes. 2008 Jul 28;1:53. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-53. PMID: 18710506; PMCID: PMC2525639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cacchioli A., Spaggiari B., Ravanetti F., Martini F.M., Borghetti P., Gabbi C. The critical sized bone defect: morphological study of bone healing. Ann. Fac. Medic. Vet. di Parma. 2006;26:97–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sandeep G., Varma H.K., Kumary T.V., Suresh Babu S., John A. Characterization of novel bioactive glass coated hydroxyapatite granules in correlation with in vitro and in vivo studies. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs. 2006;19:99–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oryan A., Meimandi Parizi A., Shafiei-Sarvestani Z., Bigham A.S. Effects of combined hydroxyapatite and human platelet rich plasma on bone healing in rabbit model: radiological, macroscopical, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation. Cell Tissue Bank. 2012 Dec;13(4):639–651. doi: 10.1007/s10561-011-9285-x. Epub 2011 Dec 18. PMID: 22180011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Parizi A.M., Oryan A., Shafiei-Sarvestani Z., Bigham A.S. Human platelet rich plasma plus Persian Gulf coral effects on experimental bone healing in rabbit model: radiological, histological, macroscopical and biomechanical evaluation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012 Feb;23(2):473–483. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4478-1. Epub 2011 Nov 5. PMID: 22057970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eckardt H., Ding M., Lind M., Hansen E.S., Christensen K.S., Hvid I. Recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor enhances bone healing in an experimental non-union model. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Oct;87(10):1434–1438. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B10.16226.PMID:16189323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eckardt H., Christensen K.S., Lind M., Hansen E.S., Hall D.W., Hvid I. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 enhances bone healing in an experimental model of fractures at risk of non-union. Injury. 2005 Apr;36(4):489–494. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.10.019. Epub 2005 Jan 23. PMID: 15755429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stafford H., Oni O.O., Hay J., Gregg P.J. An investigation of the contribution of the extraosseous tissues to the diaphyseal fracture callus using a rabbit tibial fracture model and in situ immunocytochemical localisation of osteocalcin. J. Orthop. Trauma. 1992;6(2):190–194. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199206000-00010. PMID: 1602340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oni O.O. A non-union model of the rabbit tibial diaphysis. Injury. 1995 Nov;26(9):619–622. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00132-s. PMID: 8550170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kanthan S.R., Kavitha G., Addi S., Choon D.S., Kamarul T. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) enhances bone healing in non-united critical-sized defects: a preliminary study involving rabbit models. Injury. 2011 Aug;42(8):782–789. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Feb 16. PMID: 21329922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kasten P., Vogel J., Geiger F., Niemeyer P., Luginbühl R., Szalay K. The effect of platelet-rich plasma on healing in critical-size long-bone defects. Biomaterials. 2008 Oct;29(29):3983–3992. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.014. Epub 2008 Jul 9. PMID: 18614227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Oetgen M.E., Merrell G.A., Troiano N.W., Horowitz M.C., Kacena M.A. Development of a femoral non-union model in the mouse. Injury. 2008 Oct;39(10):1119–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jul 25. PMID: 18656866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kokubu T., Hak D.J., Hazelwood S.J., Reddi A.H. Development of an atrophic non-union model and comparison to a closed healing fracture in rat femur. J. Orthop. Res. 2003 May;21(3):503–510. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00209-7. PMID: 12706024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Garcia P., Histing T., Holstein J.H., Pohlemann T., Menger M.D. Femoral non-union models in the mouse. Injury. 2010 Oct;41(10):1093–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Jul 30. PMID: 19646691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fujita M., Matsui N., Tsunoda M., Saura R. Establishment of a non-union model using muscle interposition without osteotomy in rats. Kobe J. Med. Sci. 1998 Dec;44(5–6):217–233. PMID: 10401225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dickson G.R., Geddis C., Fazzalari N., Marsh D., Parkinson I. Microcomputed tomography imaging in a rat model of delayed union/non-union fracture. J. Orthop. Res. 2008 May;26(5):729–736. doi: 10.1002/jor.20540.PMID:18050340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Roberto-Rodrigues M., Fernandes R.M., Senos R., Scoralick A.C., Bastos A.L., Santos T.M., Viana L.P., Lima I., Guzman-Silva M.A., Kfoury-Júnior J.R. Novel rat model of nonunion fracture with vascular deficit. Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):649–654. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.033. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PMID: 25661107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Onishi T., Shimizu T., Akahane M., Okuda A., Kira T., Omokawa S., Tanaka Y. Robust method to create a standardized and reproducible atrophic non-union model in a rat femur. J. Orthop. 2020 Mar 28;21:223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.040. PMID: 32273661; PMCID: PMC7132052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schmitz J.P., Hollinger J.O. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulo facial nonunions. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1986 Apr;(205):299–308. PMID: 3084153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bigham-Sadegh A., Oryan A. Selection of animal models for pre-clinical strategies in evaluating the fracture healing, bone graft substitutes and bone tissue regeneration and engineering. Connect. Tissue Res. 2015 Jun;56(3):175–194. doi: 10.3109/03008207.2015.1027341.Epub.2015.Apr.22. PMID: 25803622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (280.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Annals of Medicine and Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES