In the original article, there was a mistake in the Figures as published. We accidentally deleted an important figure during the revision and resubmission process and did not catch this issue when proofreading. The correct Figure 1 appears below, which displays the predicted IBI trajectories for the two profiles we identified using person-centered analyses. The original Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 should be regarded as Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively.
Figure 1.
Estimated IBI trajectories for the two profiles. The first profile characterized 109 topic-couple combinations, while the second characterized 24. For indistinguishable dyads, the distinguishing variable A/B was randomly assigned and should not be interpreted. Predicted trajectories for Profile 1: The Simple Profile. Predicted trajectories for Profile 2: The Complex Profile.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.