Abstract
PD-1 (Programmed cell death protein-1) is mainly expressed in various immune cells, while its ligands PD-L1/PD-L2 (Programmed death ligand-1/Programmed death ligand-2) are mostly expressed in tumor cells. Generally, the binding of PD-L1/PD-L2 and PD-1 could lead to the tumor immune evasion. However, some recent studies showed that PD-1 could also be expressed in tumor cells and could activate mTOR (Mammalian Target of Rapamycin) or Hippo signaling pathway, therefore facilitating tumor proliferation independent of the immune system. While there was evidence that tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 inhibited the activation of AKT and ERK1/2 pathways, thereby inhibiting tumor cell growth. Based on TCGA and CCLE database, we found that PD-1 was expressed in a variety of tumors and was associated with patient's prognosis. Besides, we found that PD-1 may be involved in many carcinogenic signaling pathway on the basis of PD-1 gene enrichment analysis of cancer tissues and cancer cells. Our understanding of the tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 function is still limited. This review is aimed at elaborating the potential effects of tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 on carcinogenesis, providing a novel insight into the effects of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, and helping to open a major epoch of combination therapy.
Keywords: PD-L1, tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1, immunotherapy
Introduction
PD-1 is a CD28 superfamily protein encoded by gene PDCD1 on chromosome 2q37.3 1, 2. It is a cytomembrane protein composed of 268 amino acids with three domains, including transmembrane domain, immunoglobulin V-like domain and intracellular domain 3, 4. PD-L1 and PD-L2, two ligands of PD-1, pertain to B7 protein family, which are composed of 290 amino acids and 273 amino acids, respectively 2. It is generally believed that PD-L1/PD-L2 is mainly expressed in tumor and antigen-presenting cells, while PD-1 is often expressed in various immune cells, such as T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes and myeloid dendritic cells 5-7. In tumor microenvironment, the binding of PD-L1 and PD-1 negatively regulates T cell function and inhibits the production of cytokines, thus promoting tumor immune escape 8. Pathways PI3K/Akt and MAPK (Mitogen-activated protein kinase) as well as transcriptional factors STAT3, HIF-1 and NF-ĸB have been shown to facilitate the up-regulation of PD-L1 9. TGF-β1 (Transforming growth factor-beta 1) increases the PD-1 expression of antigen-specific T cell through Smad3 10. Anti-PD-L1/anti-PD-1 drugs can restore the effective immune response of immune cells to tumor, which have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with solid tumors. However, only a few patients have achieved long-term curative effect, and many patients eventually relapse due to drug resistance 11. Recent studies have shown that PD-1 could also be expressed in tumor cells 12, but its function remains to be further studied. Therefore, it is urgent and necessary to investigate the specific mechanisms of PD-1/PD-L1 axis, especially the function of tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 independent of adaptive immunity. This review elaborates the potential effects of tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 on carcinogenesis and its clinical significance.
The structure and regulation of PD-1
PD-1 was first found in mouse apoptotic T cells in 1992. It is an inhibitory costimulatory molecule, also known as CD279, encoded by gene PDCD1 on chromosome 2q37.3 1. PD-1 is a transmembrane protein, which consists of 268 amino acids with a relative molecular weight of 50-55 KDa. It consists of three parts: extracellular IgV-like domain, hydrophobic transmembrane domain and intracellular domain, including immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif (ITSM) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) which are important structural sites for PD-1 to exert immunosuppressive effect 13, 14. PD-1 is mainly found on the surface of B cell, activated CD4+, CD8+ T cell and monocytes 5-7. The PD-1 expression of T cell surface could be induced by some cytokines such as IL-7, IL-15 and IL-21 15. miRNAs are a particular type of non-coding single-stranded RNA molecules encoded by endogenous genes and have about 22 nucleotides in length, which inhibit mRNA translation or directly degrade it by completely or partially pairing with complementary sequences on mRNA 3'UTR of the target gene 16. It has been found that the interaction of miR-4717 and PD-1 3'UTR single nucleotide polymorphism rs10204525 could down-regulate the expression of PD-1, affect the progress of chronic HBV infection, and change the immune status of the body at the same time 17. miR-28 and miR-138 have also been shown to inhibit the expression of PD-1 18, 19. Besides, TGF-β1 could enhance PD-1 expression on TILs (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes) through Smad3, thereby inducing tumor escape from host immune responses 10.
The PD-1 signaling pathway
The complete immune systems could identify and eliminate tumor cells through immune examination, but tumors can adapt to and evade these defense mechanisms 20, 21. The combination of PD-L1 and PD-1 can phosphorylate the tyrosine in ITSM domain of PD-1, recruit SHP-1 (Src homology 2 domain-containing phosphatases-1) and SHP-2, and inhibit the activation of PI3K/Akt, which ultimately weakens the activation and proliferation of T lymphocytes, inhibits cytokine secretion and induces apoptosis of T lymphocytes 22, 23. PI3K/Akt signal is a significant downstream pathway of PD-1. PD-1 can induce PTEN phosphatase activity, thus inhibiting P13K/Akt pathway 24-26. PD-1 also prevents T cell from expressing PI3K-dependent anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-XL 27. Besides, PD-1 can block Ras/MEK/ERK pathway, thereby regulating cell cycle molecules and halting the proliferation of T cell 28. Interestingly, PD-1 inhibits PI3K/Akt pathway in a few minutes, while blocking Ras/MEK/ERK pathway takes several hours 29. In addition, PD-1 can hinder phosphorylation of ZAP70 and activation of PKC-θ, which are critical for T-cell activation, and prevent the development of effector T cells by promoting fatty acid oxidation and inhibiting glycolysis 30, 31. Also, PD-1/PD-L1 axis can activate and transmit anti-Fas apoptotic signal, affect the differentiation of dendritic cells and T lymphocytes, and activate the cytolytic effect of innate anti-CD8+ T lymphocytes 32. Furthermore, PD-1/PD-L1 axis can promote the development of iTreg (induced regulatory T) cell and increase Foxp3 expression on its surface, induce the differentiation of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Treg and maintain its immunosuppressive function, thereby indirectly inhibiting T cells proliferation and promoting tumor immune evasion 33.
Expression of PD-1 in cancer and its prognostic significance
It is widely believed that PD-1 is often expressed in activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, dendritic cells (DCs) and monocytes 5-7. In the tumor microenvironment, PD-1 is mainly expressed on the surface tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. It has been demonstrated that PD-1 and AFAP1-AS1 (Actin filament-associated protein 1 antisense RNA 1) were co-expressed in the infiltrating lymphocytes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissues and patients with co-expression of AFAP1-AS1 and PD-1 had poor survival 34. Besides, it was confirmed by Li et al. that PD-1 of lymphocytes was an independent prognostic factor both for DFS and OS of colorectal cancer patients 35. Interestingly, PD-1 positivity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was also an independent worse prognosis factor in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma 36.
However, some emerging studies have shown the expression and functions of PD-1 in tumor cells and tissues 12. The expession of PD-1 protein in different tissues from THE HUMAN PROTEIN ATLAS (https://www.proteinatlas.org/) was shown Figure 1. Li and his colleagues found that liver cancer cells and tissues could express PD-1, and hepatocellular carcinoma patients with low PD-1 expression had a higher survival rate and disease-free survival 37. In addition, there was also the expression of tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 in NSCLC 38. Most notably, it has been demonstrated that PD-1 was also localized in cytoplasm and cell membrance of the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells and its expression was associated with OS 39. The main driver of tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 expression remains unclear, but epigenetic alteration, gene amplification and posttranscriptional modification may be involved. In conclusion, PD-1 is expressed not only on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, but also on tumor cells, which has shed new light on the precision treatment of tumors.
Besides, in order to further expound the PD-1 mRNA level and its prognostic significance in various cancrs, we used UALCAN website (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) to analyse TCGA gene data. In our results, we found that mRNA expression of PD-1 (PDCD1) was evidently higher in lung adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, breast invasive carcinoma and renal clear cell carcinoma than that in normal control (Figure 2; all P<0.05). In addition, mRNA expression of PD-1 (PDCD1) was also elevated in metastasis cutaneous melanoma than that in primary cutaneous melanoma (P<0.0001). But, we also found that mRNA expression of PD-1 (PDCD1) was higher in normal control than that in thyroid carcinoma (P<0.05) but no different was found between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its normal control (P>0.05). Furthermore, the results showed that high PD-1 (PDCD1) mRNA level patients had poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia, cutaneous melanoma and renal carcinoma (Figure 3; all P<0.05), but had no impact on pancreatic carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer and breast invasive carcinoma (all P>0.05).
The roles of tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1
Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 activates mTOR pathway
mTOR, a considerably conserved serine/threonine protein kinase, is one of the important substrates downstream of Akt 40, which exists in the form of mTORCl and mTORC2 complexes 41. mTORC1 consists of mTOR, raptor and mLST8 and regulates the biosynthesis of intracellular translation elements 42. mTOR signaling pathway is key to gene translation, which ultimately regulates cell growth and survival 43. Activated mTORC1 can phosphorylate its downstream 4E-BP1 and S6K1. Phosphorylated 4E-BP1 dissociates from eIF4E, makes elF4E free and promotes the transcription of proto-oncogenes such as c-myc and HIF-1α 44, 45. While phosphorylated S6K1 can continue to phosphorylate ribosomal protein S6, elF4B and other targets related to the translation of mRNA 46. In hepatocellular carcinoma, tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 can active mTOR pathway, which binds to the downstream target molecules S6 and eIF4E and promotes their phosphorylation, thus promoting tumor progression independently from specific immunity 37. The findings put forward the possibility that PD-1 may be associated with cyclin D1 in tumor development by the regulation of p-eIF4E and suppress tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis by regulating S6 37. Intriguingly, melanoma-expressed PD-1 activates mTOR signaling and promotes tumorigenesis by interacting with PD-L1 47.
Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 activates Hippo pathway
Hippo signaling pathway regulates organ size through suppressing cell proliferation and increasing apoptosis and plays a significant role in development and homeostasis. Its main members include MST1/2, LATS1/2, SAV1, MOB1 and downstream effector molecules YAP and TAZ in mammals 48, 49. Dysregulation of this pathway is also related to the development of cancers. When Hippo pathway is activated, MST1/2 kinase binds to its ligand protein Sav and activates Sav. Then phosphorylated LATS1/2 kinase and MOB1 protein increase LATS/MOB1 complex and activate LATS1/2 kinase. Finally, activated LATS1/2 kinase phosphorylates and inactivates YAP and TAZ 50. On the contrary, dephosphorylated YAP/TAZ translocates into the nucleus, thereby induces the expression of target gene through binding to transcription factors, such as TEA domain family members 51, 52. In pancreatic cancer, tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 interacts with MOB1 and decreases MOB1 phosphorylation, thereby suppressing the phosphorylation of LATS1 and inactivating LATS1, which inhibits YAP phosphorylation and accumulates YAP protein. And the accumulated YAP protein binds to TEDA and translocates into the nucleus, activating downstream genes of Hippo pathway, such as CYR61 and CTGF, which facilitates tumor proliferation independent of the immune system 39.
Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 inhibits AKT and ERK1/2 pathways
p-AKT (phosphorylated protein kinase B) is a key molecule in activating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway that plays a crucial role in tumor development and progression 53. ERK1/2 (extracellular regulated protein kinase 1/2) is a member of MAPK (mitogen activated protein kinase) family. p-ERK1/2 (phosphorylated ERK1/2) can transfer to the nucleus, regulate the activity of transcription factors, and ultimately change the metabolism and function of cells and participate in forming malignant tumor cells 54-56. In lung cancer, tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 is a tumor suppressor that inhibits the activation of AKT and ERK1/2 and thereby inhibits tumor cell growth 57. These evidences suggest that tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 plays different roles in various tumors.
PD-1 Gene enrichment analysis
Enrichment Analysis of Cancer Tissues
Sample data of liver cancer, melanoma, lung cancer and pancreatic cancer were downloaded from TCGA database, which were grouped into high and low expression on the basis of mean value of PD-1 (PDCD1) level. The differentially expressed genes were analyzed by analysis software DECenter (│logFC│>1, P<0.05). The GO and KEGG analysis about PDCD1 gene were analyzed by online DAVID website (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/). The results showed that in liver cancer, there were 1175 differentially expressed genes, including 1067 up-regulation and 108 down-regulation. KEGG analysis found they were chiefly related to signaling pathways, such as PI3K-Akt, Chemokine, NF-kappa B, Jak-STAT, HIF-1, VEGF and TNF (Figure 4A). In melanoma, we found 779 differentially expressed genes, including 762 up-regulation and 17 down-regulation. KEGG found they were associated with signaling pathways, such as Chemokine, Jak-STAT, NF-kappa B, Toll-like receptor, Rap1, TNF and NOD-like receptor (Figure 4B). In lung cancer, there were 741 differentially expressed genes, including 52 up-regulation and 689 down-regulation. KEGG indicated they were related to signaling pathways, such as Chemokine, NF-kappa B, Jak-STAT, Rap1, TNF and Toll-like receptor (Figure 4C). In pancreatic cancer, there were 981 differentially expressed genes, including 23 up-regulation and 958 down-regulation. KEGG found they were related to signaling pathways, such as Chemokine, NF-kappa B, Jak-STAT, Toll-like receptor, PI3K-Akt and Ras (Figure 4D). GO analysis of PD-1 in these four cancers showed that differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in molecular functions related to immune response, signal transduction, cell adhesion, positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade and GTPase activity.
Enrichment Analysis of Cancer Cells
Data from TCGA database may not precisely reflect the PD-1 (PDCD1) level of tumor cells, because there are a lot of infiltrating immune cells in tumor tissues. Therefore, we also analyzed PD-1 (PDCD1) expression in CCLE dataset to exclude the effect of PD-1 on immune cells. Data of PD-1 mRNA in lung cancer cells, liver cancer cells, melanoma cells and pancreatic cancer cells were grouped into high and low expression on the basis of mean value of PD-1. The differentially expressed genes were analyzed by software DECenter (|logFC|>0.1, P<0.05). The GO and KEGG analysis about PD-1 were analyzed by online DAVID website. The results showed that in liver cancer, there were 142 differentially expressed genes, including 137 up-regulation and 5 down-regulation. GO enrichment analysis showed they were relative to positive regulation of apoptotic process and G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway. KEGG analysis found they were chiefly related to signaling pathways, such as mTOR, folate biosynthesis and protein digestion and absorption (Figure 5A). In melanoma, we found 165 differentially expressed genes, all of which were up-regulated genes. GO enrichment analysis indicated these genes were relative to metabolic process, intracellular signal transduction and retinoic acid metabolic process. KEGG analysis found they were connected with signal pathways, like drug metabolism-cytochrome P450, metabolic pathways and chemical carcinogenesis (Figure 5B). In lung cancer, there were 469 differentially expressed genes, including 419 up-regulation and 50 down-regulation. GO enrichment analysis indicated these genes were relative to intracellular signal transduction, positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, angiogenesis and integrin-mediated signaling pathway. KEGG analysis indicated they were connected with retinol metabolism, metabolic pathways and proteoglycans in cancer (Figure 5C). In pancreatic cancer, there were 1129 differentially expressed genes, including 689 up-regulation and 440 down-regulation. GO enrichment analysis showed that they were relative to apoptotic process, response to drug, cell-cell adhesion, protein folding and metabolic process. KEGG analysis indicated they were connected with metabolic pathways, ECM-receptor interaction, retinol metabolism and chemical carcinogenesis (Figure 5D).
Combination therapy based on PD-1 inhibitors
Currently, cancer immunotherapy is changing the clinical treatment of various cancers. PD-1 antibodies, such as, Nivolumab (Opdivo) and cemiplimab (Libtayo) and PD-L1 antibodies, like duravulumab and Atezolizumab, have been approved to be used in clinical application 58. Anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibodies could relieve immunosuppression of T cells by binding with PD-1/PD-L1, thereby recovering T cell ability to kill tumor cells and normalizing the immune system 59, 60. However, only a proportion of patients could be beneficial from this immunotherapy with low response rate. More and more researches have shown that the combination of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibodies with other therapies may achieve better clinical results 58. CTLA-4 is different from PD-1 in inhibiting the activation of T cell 61. Greater clinical benefits can be obtained when combined with CTLA-4 and PD-1 in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and lung cancer 62. Besides, the combination of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 blockade with chemoradiotherapy has also shown promising results, especially in NSCLC patients, who have achieved higher overall efficacy and survival rate in the combined treatment 63. In addition to the tumor itself, gastrointestinal microbiome may also affect the response to immunotherapy. Some remarkable studies have reported that good gut bacteria were necessary for patient's response to anti-PD-1 therapy and thereby the combination with anti-microbiome modulation may be beneficial for immunotherapy 64, 65. Because PD-1 can also be expressed on tumor cells and activate some carcinogenic signaling pathway, many combination therapies based on this are also under development. For example, researchers find that in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 can facilitate tumor growth through hippo pathway and PD-1 checkpoint blockade combined with hippo pathway inhibitors can enhance its antitumor effect 39. Results from recent evidences demonstrate that tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 can activate mTOR signal in liver cancer and combination therapy targeting mTOR pathways and PD-1 may have a better clinical efficacy 37. So far, there are many clinical studies about combination therapy based on PD-1 inhibitor Nivolumab, which is shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Combination drug | Clinical trial ID | Phase | Study title |
---|---|---|---|
Nivolumab+Azacitidine | NCT04128020 | Phase 1 | Azacitidine Plus Nivolumab Following Reduced-intensity Allogeneic PBSC Transplantation for Patients With AML and High-risk Myelodysplasia |
Nivolumab+Avadomide (CC-122) | NCT03834623 | Phase 2 | Avadomide (CC-122) in Combination With Nivolumab in Advanced Melanoma |
Nivolumab+Testosterone cypionate | NCT03554317 | Phase 2 | COMbination of Bipolar Androgen Therapy and Nivolumab (COMBAT-CRPC) |
Nivolumab+Tivozanib | NCT03136627 | Phase 1/2 | Phase 1/2 Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Nivolumab in Subjects With RCC |
Nivolumab+Ipilimumab | NCT03651271 | Phase 2 | Treatment With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone according to the Percentage of Tumoral CD8 Cells in Advanced Metastatic Cancer |
Nivolumab+Ramucirumab | NCT03502746 | Phase 2 | Phase II Nivolumab and Ramucirumab for Patients With Previously-Treated Mesothelioma |
Nivolumab+Ipilimumab | NCT03789110 | Phase 2 | NIMBUS: Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Metastatic Hypermutated HER2-negative Breast Cancer |
Nivolumab+ Regorafenib | NCT03712943 | Phase 1 | Regorafenib and Nivolumab in Mismatch Repair (MMR) Refractory Colorectal Cancer |
Nivolumab+Cabozantinib | NCT04197310 | Phase 2 | Cabozantinib and Nivolumab for Carcinoid Tumors |
Nivolumab+Anlotinib Hydrochloride | NCT04503967 | Phase 2 | Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Hydrochloride Combined With Nivolumab in the Treatment of Gastric and Esophageal Cancer (OASIS) |
Nivolumab+Pemetrexed | NCT04107103 | Phase 2 | Nivolumab Plus Pemetrexed for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (NivoPlus) |
Nivolumab+HF10 | NCT03259425 | Phase 2 | Neoadjuvant Trial of Nivolumab in Combination With HF10 Oncolytic Viral Therapy in Resectable Stage IIIB, IIIC, IVM1a Melanoma |
Nivolumab+HBI-8000 | NCT02718066 | Phase 1/2 | Study of HBI-8000 With Nivolumab in Melanoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
Nivolumab+Copanlisib | NCT03884998 | Phase 1 | Copanlisib and Nivolumab in Treating Participants With Richter's Transformation or Transformed Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma |
Nivolumab+APX005M | NCT03123783 | Phase 1/2 | CD40 Agonistic Antibody APX005M in Combination With Nivolumab |
Nivolumab+ACY-241 | NCT02635061 | Phase 1 | Selective HDAC6 Inhibitor ACY 241 in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
Taken together, further clarifying the combination anti-PD-L1/PD-1 with other therapies will have synergistic effects and improve the clinical results of multiple cancer patients.
Conclusion
For a long time, it has been widely believed that PD-1 is only expressed on immune cells and PD-L1 is mainly on tumor cells. With more and more in-depth researches, PD-1 on tumor cells has been revealed. Recent studies indicated PD-1 was found in liver cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and pancreatic cancer cells. Also, researchers found that tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 may activate mTOR or Hippo signaling pathway, therefore facilitating tumor proliferation independent from immune system. However, tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 can also inhibit the activation of AKT and ERK1/2 pathways, thereby inhibiting tumor cell growth. We used TCGA and CCLE database for enrichment analysis and found that PD-1 may be involved in many carcinogenic signaling pathway. Although there are increasing studies aimed at elucidating the roles of PD-1 and its clinical significance in tumor cells, our understanding about it is still limited. In the future, further researches on tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 might offer a novel insight into the effects of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy, and help to open a major era of combination therapy.
Acknowledgments
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 81773218, 81972838 and 81703009) and The Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No: 2017JJ3457).
Availability of data and materials
Data were obtained from the TCGA and CCLE database, UALCAN website (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/), THE HUMAN PROTEIN ATLAS (https://www.proteinatlas.org/) and the DAVID website (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/).
Author Contributions
Hongmei zheng wrote the manuscript and created the figures and the table. The other authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Abbreviations
- PD-1
programmed cell death protein-1
- PD-L1
programmed death ligand-1
- PD-L2
programmed death ligand-2
- mTOR
Mammalian Target of Rapamycin
- TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
- MAPK
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- STAT3
Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3
- HIF-1
hypoxia inducible factor-1
- NF-ĸB
nuclear factor kappa-B
- TGF-β1
transforming growth factor-beta 1
- ITSM
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif
- ITIM
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif
- SHP-1
Src homology 2 domain-containing phosphatases-1
- iTreg
induced regulatory T
- DCs
dendritic cells
- NKT
natural killer T cells
- AFAP1-AS1
actin filament-associated protein 1 antisense RNA 1
- NPC
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- OS
overall survival
- DFS
disease free survival
- NSCLC
non-small cell lung cancer
- mLST8
mammalian ortholog of LST8
- 4E-BP1
eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1
- S6K1
p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase B1
- eIF4E
eukaryotic initiation factor 4E
- elF4B
eukaryotic initiation factor 4B
- MST1/2
mammalian STE20-like protein kinase 1/2
- LATS1/2
large tumor suppressor 1/2
- SAV1
Salvador family WW domain-containing protein 1
- MOB1
MOB kinase activator 1
- YAP
Yes-associated protein
- TAZ
transcriptional coactivator with a PDZ-binding domain
- TEADs
TEA domain family members
- CYR61
cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61
- CTGF
connective tissue growth factor
- CCLE
Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia
- CTLA-4
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4
- PDAC
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
References
- 1.Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K. et al. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 1992;11:3887–95. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05481.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ok CY, Young KH. Targeting the programmed death-1 pathway in lymphoid neoplasms. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;54:99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Daeron M, Jaeger S, Du Pasquier L. et al. Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs: a quest in the past and future. Immunol Rev. 2008;224:11–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.El FA, Voisin T, Rouyer-Fessard C. et al. Discovery of a functional immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif in a 7-transmembrane-spanning receptor: role in the orexin receptor OX1R-driven apoptosis. FASEB J. 2009;23:4069–80. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-131367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Azuma T, Yao S, Zhu G. et al. B7-H1 is a ubiquitous antiapoptotic receptor on cancer cells. Blood. 2008;111:3635–43. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-123141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fourcade J, Sun Z, Benallaoua M. et al. Upregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients. J Exp Med. 2010;207:2175–86. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yao S, Chen L. PD-1 as an immune modulatory receptor. Cancer J. 2014;20:262–4. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim JW, Eder JP. Prospects for targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 in various tumor types. Oncology (Williston Park) 2014;28(Suppl 3):15–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen J, Jiang CC, Jin L. et al. Regulation of PD-L1: a novel role of pro-survival signalling in cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:409–16. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Park BV, Freeman ZT, Ghasemzadeh A. et al. TGFbeta1-Mediated SMAD3 Enhances PD-1 Expression on Antigen-Specific T Cells in Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:1366–81. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meyers DE, Bryan PM, Banerji S. et al. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Oncol. 2018;25:e324–34. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yao H, Wang H, Li C. et al. Cancer Cell-Intrinsic PD-1 and Implications in Combinatorial Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1774. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Okazaki T, Honjo T. PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application. Int Immunol. 2007;19:813–24. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxm057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sidorenko SP, Clark EA. The dual-function CD150 receptor subfamily: the viral attraction. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:19–24. doi: 10.1038/ni0103-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kinter AL, Godbout EJ, McNally JP. et al. The common gamma-chain cytokines IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21 induce the expression of programmed death-1 and its ligands. J Immunol. 2008;181:6738–46. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.6738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–5. doi: 10.1038/nature02871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang G, Li N, Li Z. et al. microRNA-4717 differentially interacts with its polymorphic target in the PD1 3' untranslated region: A mechanism for regulating PD-1 expression and function in HBV-associated liver diseases. Oncotarget. 2015;6:18933–44. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li Q, Johnston N, Zheng X. et al. miR-28 modulates exhaustive differentiation of T cells through silencing programmed cell death-1 and regulating cytokine secretion. Oncotarget. 2016;7:53735–50. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wei J, Nduom EK, Kong LY. et al. MiR-138 exerts anti-glioma efficacy by targeting immune checkpoints. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18:639–48. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Disis ML. Immune regulation of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4531–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dolan DE, Gupta S. PD-1 pathway inhibitors: changing the landscape of cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Control. 2014;21:231–7. doi: 10.1177/107327481402100308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carter L, Fouser LA, Jussif J. et al. PD-1:PD-L inhibitory pathway affects both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and is overcome by IL-2. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32:634–43. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200203)32:3<634::AID-IMMU634>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cheng X, Veverka V, Radhakrishnan A. et al. Structure and interactions of the human programmed cell death 1 receptor. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:11771–85. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.448126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Patsoukis N, Li L, Sari D. et al. PD-1 increases PTEN phosphatase activity while decreasing PTEN protein stability by inhibiting casein kinase 2. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:3091–8. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00319-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Torres J, Pulido R. The tumor suppressor PTEN is phosphorylated by the protein kinase CK2 at its C terminus. Implications for PTEN stability to proteasome-mediated degradation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:993–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009134200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vazquez F, Ramaswamy S, Nakamura N. et al. Phosphorylation of the PTEN tail regulates protein stability and function. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:5010–8. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.14.5010-5018.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Parry RV, Chemnitz JM, Frauwirth KA. et al. CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors inhibit T-cell activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:9543–53. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9543-9553.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Patsoukis N, Brown J, Petkova V. et al. Selective effects of PD-1 on Akt and Ras pathways regulate molecular components of the cell cycle and inhibit T cell proliferation. Sci Signal. 2012;5:a46. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saunders PA, Hendrycks VR, Lidinsky WA. et al. PD-L2:PD-1 involvement in T cell proliferation, cytokine production, and integrin-mediated adhesion. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:3561–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.200526347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Patsoukis N, Bardhan K, Chatterjee P. et al. PD-1 alters T-cell metabolic reprogramming by inhibiting glycolysis and promoting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6692. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sheppard KA, Fitz LJ, Lee JM. et al. PD-1 inhibits T-cell receptor induced phosphorylation of the ZAP70/CD3zeta signalosome and downstream signaling to PKCtheta. FEBS Lett. 2004;574:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen L, Han X. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: past, present, and future. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3384–91. doi: 10.1172/JCI80011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Park HJ, Kusnadi A, Lee EJ. et al. Tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells delineated by upregulation of PD-1 and inhibitory receptors. Cell Immunol. 2012;278:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2012.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tang Y, He Y, Shi L. et al. Co-expression of AFAP1-AS1 and PD-1 predicts poor prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:39001–11. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li Y, Liang L, Dai W. et al. Prognostic impact of programed cell death-1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in cancer cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2016;15:55. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0539-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krabbe LM, Heitplatz B, Preuss S. et al. Prognostic Value of PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Patients with High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Urol. 2017;198:1253–62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li H, Li X, Liu S. et al. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint blockade in combination with a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor restrains hepatocellular carcinoma growth induced by hepatoma cell-intrinsic PD-1. Hepatology. 2017;66:1920–33. doi: 10.1002/hep.29360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Du S, McCall N, Park K. et al. Blockade of Tumor-Expressed PD-1 promotes lung cancer growth. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1408747. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1408747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pu N, Gao S, Yin H. et al. Cell-intrinsic PD-1 promotes proliferation in pancreatic cancer by targeting CYR61/CTGF via the hippo pathway. Cancer Lett. 2019;460:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hare SH, Harvey AJ. mTOR function and therapeutic targeting in breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:383–404. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zou Z, Chen J, Yang J. et al. Targeted Inhibition of Rictor/mTORC2 in Cancer Treatment: A New Era after Rapamycin. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2016;16:288–304. doi: 10.2174/1568009616666151113120830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Carneiro BA, Kaplan JB, Altman JK. et al. Targeting mTOR signaling pathways and related negative feedback loops for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16:648–56. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1026510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012;149:274–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Probst HC, McCoy K, Okazaki T. et al. Resting dendritic cells induce peripheral CD8+ T cell tolerance through PD-1 and CTLA-4. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:280–6. doi: 10.1038/ni1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wan X, Helman LJ. The biology behind mTOR inhibition in sarcoma. Oncologist. 2007;12:1007–18. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-8-1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Holz MK, Ballif BA, Gygi SP. et al. mTOR and S6K1 mediate assembly of the translation preinitiation complex through dynamic protein interchange and ordered phosphorylation events. Cell. 2005;123:569–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kleffel S, Posch C, Barthel SR. et al. Melanoma Cell-Intrinsic PD-1 Receptor Functions Promote Tumor Growth. Cell. 2015;162:1242–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu H, Du S, Lei T. et al. Multifaceted regulation and functions of YAP/TAZ in tumors (Review) Oncol Rep. 2018;40:16–28. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kriz V, Korinek V. Wnt, RSPO and Hippo Signalling in the Intestine and Intestinal Stem Cells. Genes (Basel) 2018. 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Hansen CG, Ng YL, Lam WL. et al. The Hippo pathway effectors YAP and TAZ promote cell growth by modulating amino acid signaling to mTORC1. Cell Res. 2015;25:1299–313. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Piccolo S, Dupont S, Cordenonsi M. The biology of YAP/TAZ: hippo signaling and beyond. Physiol Rev. 2014;94:1287–312. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00005.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hansen CG, Moroishi T, Guan KL. YAP and TAZ: a nexus for Hippo signaling and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zheng H, Zhan Y, Zhang Y. et al. Elevated expression of G3BP1 associates with YB1 and p-AKT and predicts poor prognosis in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients after surgical resection. Cancer Med. 2019;8:6894–903. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Collier JB, Schnellmann RG. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 regulates NAD metabolism during acute kidney injury through microRNA-34a-mediated NAMPT expression. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77:3643–55. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03391-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Roskoski RJ. Targeting ERK1/2 protein-serine/threonine kinases in human cancers. Pharmacol Res. 2019;142:151–68. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Urosevic J, Blasco MT, Llorente A. et al. ERK1/2 Signaling Induces Upregulation of ANGPT2 and CXCR4 to Mediate Liver Metastasis in Colon Cancer. Cancer Res. 2020;80:4668–80. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-4028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang X, Yang X, Zhang C. et al. Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 receptor is a tumor suppressor and mediates resistance to PD-1 blockade therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:6640–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921445117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jiang Y, Chen M, Nie H. et al. PD-1 and PD-L1 in cancer immunotherapy: clinical implications and future considerations. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15:1111–22. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1571892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Page DB, Postow MA, Callahan MK. et al. Immune modulation in cancer with antibodies. Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:185–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-092012-112807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sanmamed MF, Chen L. A Paradigm Shift in Cancer Immunotherapy: From Enhancement to Normalization. Cell. 2018;175:313–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wei SC, Levine JH, Cogdill AP. et al. Distinct Cellular Mechanisms Underlie Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade. Cell. 2017;170:1120–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359:1350–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mathew M, Enzler T, Shu CA. et al. Combining chemotherapy with PD-1 blockade in NSCLC. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;186:130–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L. et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359:97–103. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Matson V, Fessler J, Bao R. et al. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359:104–8. doi: 10.1126/science.aao3290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data were obtained from the TCGA and CCLE database, UALCAN website (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/), THE HUMAN PROTEIN ATLAS (https://www.proteinatlas.org/) and the DAVID website (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/).