Abstract
A 46-year-old man experienced facial burns due to a fire in his house. In the prehospital setting, suspecting inhalation injury and carbon monoxide poisoning, an emergency physician decided to bring him to the hospital for carbon dioxide (CO2) monitoring without endotracheal intubation for approximately 20 min because of less severe respiratory distress. On the way to the hospital, the patient’s end-tidal CO2 monitoring ranged from 19 to 30 mm Hg, and transcutaneous carbon dioxide (TcPCO2) remained between 50 and 55 mm Hg. On arrival at the hospital, PaCO2 showed 51.6 mm Hg. Endotracheal intubation using a bronchoscope was performed in the emergency room, and inhalation injury was observed. He was extubated on day 5 and discharged on day 10. In the prehospital setting, TcPCO2 monitoring is useful for initial management of non-intubated inhalation injury patients even with high concentration oxygen.
Keywords: prehospital, trauma
Background
Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (TcPCO2) monitoring has been reported to be beneficial since the 1980s. However, the research fields were restricted to perinatal, paediatric, anaesthetic, intensive care, and so on.1–4 Although a few articles reported interhospital transport,5 6 to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated TcPCO2 monitoring in the prehospital emergency setting.
Theoretically, TcPCO2 could be independent of inhaled high concentration oxygen and could be more reliable than end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) according to a previous report.7 In case of inhalation injury, discontinuing or reducing high concentration oxygen is difficult, because not only respiratory insufficiency but also carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is treated by high oxygen flow and concentration. Therefore, the initial management of inhalation injury seemed to be a good target for the TcPCO2 monitoring.
We report herein the first non-intubated inhalation injury case demonstrating the high accuracy of TcPCO2 to simultaneously monitor transcutaneous and transnasal CO2 under high concentration oxygen in the prehospital setting.
Case presentation
A 46-year-old man, who was a never-smoker experienced facial burns due to a fire in his house, which he escaped from by himself after 5 min. Emergency medical technicians (EMT) arrived at the scene, and then a doctor-stuffed ambulance was dispatched because of the possibility of inhalation injury. In the prehospital setting, the emergency physician (EP) observed nose and ear redness, burned vibrissae and head hair, soot in the nasal and oral cavities, hoarseness, slight stridor and severe abnormal crackles in the lungs. On examination, his vital signs were as follows: Glasgow Coma Scale, 15 (E4V5M6); blood pressure, 96/71 mm Hg; heart rate, 87 beats/min; respiratory rate, 40 breaths/min; and oxygen saturation, 96% with 15 L/min oxygen. His respiratory distress slightly improved compared with that at first presentation to the EMT. As per the EP’s discretion, inhalation injury in the peripheral airways played a major role in the patient’s pathology compared with upper airway swelling. Therefore, as per the EP’s expertise, the patient did not need to be intubated immediately. With regards to CO poisoning and administering high concentration oxygen, the EP decided to bring him to the hospital for further CO2 monitoring without endotracheal intubation for approximately 20 min, with standby surgical airway management. Transnasal CO2 was measured using BSM-4103 (NIHON KODEN; Tokyo), and TcPCO2 was monitored using TCM5 (RADIOMETER; Tokyo) (figure 1). On the way to the hospital, the patient’s end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) monitoring ranged from 19 to 30 mm Hg, and TcPCO2 remained between 50 and 55 mm Hg (figure 1). Finally, EtCO2 and TcPCO2 on arrival were 22 mm Hg and 51 mm Hg, respectively. On arrival, initial arterial blood gas analysis showed PaCO2 of 51.6 mm Hg; therefore, the TcPCO2 value was more approximate. His carboxyhaemoglobin (Hb-CO) value was 6.0%. Endotracheal intubation using a bronchoscope was performed in the emergency room and inhalation injury was observed. Swelling was observed at the arytenoid region, and a large amount of soot was found in his trachea and bilateral and distal parts of the main bronchus (figure 2). He was admitted to the intensive care unit after clearance of the soot.
Figure 1.
Prehospital carbon monoxide monitoring. (A) Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (TcPCO2) (white arrow) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (black arrow-head) monitoring sensor on the patient. (B) Monitor screen revealed TcPCO2: 55 mm Hg (white arrow), and EtCO2: 19 mm Hg (black arrow-head).
Figure 2.
Bronchoscopy findings on admission. (A) Swelling of the arytenoid region (black arrow head). (B, C) Soot was detected in the trachea and bilateral parts of the main bronchus.
Outcome and follow-up
After admission, laryngeal oedema was examined using a bronchoscope daily. When laryngeal oedema was resolved and endotracheal cuff leakage was identified, the patient was extubated without any neurological sequelae on day 5. He was transferred to the department of internal medicine and dermatology on day 10.
Discussion
In the initial management of burn injury, inhalation injury should be considered. Abnormal respiratory sounds and contractions of respiratory accessory muscles have been reported as intubation predictors.8 In this case, several findings have been found to be related to upper and lower airway abnormality; thus, inhalation injury and necessity of intubation were suspected early. However, prehospital intubation is a high-risk procedure for patients suspected with laryngeal oedema by only one EP.9 In addition, in case of a difficult airway, there were only few alternative approaches, such as bronchoscope-assisted intubation except for surgical interventions. Therefore, the EP decided to bring the patient to the hospital without intubation and to monitor CO2. In the prehospital setting, capnometry is an important tool for early detection of circulatory and/or respiratory failure, including airway obstruction or breathing abnormalities by means of monitoring sudden changes of EtCO2.10–12 For this reason, our doctor-stuffed ambulance has been equipped with EtCO2 monitor for intubated and non-intubated patients. However, in non-intubated patients, EtCO2 monitoring might be inaccurate when a measuring site is exposed to high concentration oxygen13 to prevent hypoxia and/or hypercapnia or to hasten the dissociation of CO from CO-Hb. Considering these reasons, TcPCO2 has been recently available on trial in our hospital. In fact, the gap between EtCO2 and TcPCO2 values is high immediately after arrival because of two reasons: the measuring methodology of EtCO2, that is, CO2 diluted by high oxygen flow and the dead space increased due to hyperventilation. Lastly, the high TcPCO2 value was consistent with inhalation injury, as confirmed by bronchoscopy, indicating that TcPCO2 could be a useful predictor for prehospital diagnosis of inhalation injury.
In general, the earlobe is the region for TcPCO2 measurement4; however, an intact precordial region could be an alternative location in case of facial epidermal burn including the bilateral earlobes, such as present case. The duration of TcPCO2 monitoring is limited to 8 hours.4 Because monitoring probes may heat up moderately, its overuse sometimes causes thermal injury on the contacting skin. In Japan, it might not be a serious problem because a routine prehospital medical practice can be completed within an hour. Hinkelbein et al demonstrated that TcPCO2 provided an accuracy equivalent to arterial blood gas analysis during inter-hospital ground transport of critically ill adult patients.6 During the trial, TcPCO2 values were also stable in other trauma patients despite variation of temperature or ambulance vibration. A majority of monitored patients had TcPCO2 that was practically approximate to PaCO2 on arrival.
There are some problems for this device. The electrochemical method requires 10 min or so to heat a sensor probe and to calibrate and equilibrate the device for an accurate and reliable measurement.1 Furthermore, an effect of CO or cyanide poisoning on TcPCO2 monitoring is unknown.
Learning points.
This is the first reported case of prehospital emergency management using transcutaneous carbon dioxide (TcPCO2) monitoring.
TcPCO2 monitoring is a reliable method for patients without intubation under high concentration oxygen in estimating PaCO2.
From the viewpoint of not only monitoring but also diagnosis, TcPCO2 monitoring is found to be reasonable in the initial management of non-intubated inhalation injury patients.
Footnotes
Contributors: SK joined with the treatment of this patient. SI and SM designed this manuscript. SN gave a final approval to submit this manuscript.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared. However, our institution leased TCM5 (RADIOMETER) for free from IMI for 6 months since January 2018.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Obtained.
References
- 1.Mari A, Nougue H, Mateo J, et al. Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring in critically ill patients: update and perspectives. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:S1558–67. 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chandrakantan A, Jasiewicz R, Reinsel RA, et al. Transcutaneous CO2 versus end-tidal CO2 in neonates and infants undergoing surgery: a prospective study. Med Devices 2019;12:165–72. 10.2147/MDER.S198707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lermuzeaux M, Meric H, Sauneuf B, et al. Superiority of transcutaneous CO2 over end-tidal CO2 measurement for monitoring respiratory failure in nonintubated patients: A pilot study. J Crit Care 2016;31:150–6. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bendjelid K, Schütz N, Stotz M, et al. Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring in critically ill adults: clinical evaluation of a new sensor. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2203–6. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000181734.26070.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jacob J, Rose D, Stilson M, et al. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during neonatal transport. Crit Care Med 1986;14:1050–2. 10.1097/00003246-198612000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hinkelbein J, Floss F, Denz C, et al. Accuracy and precision of three different methods to determine PCO2 (PaCO2 vs. Petco2 vs. Ptcco2) during interhospital ground transport of critically ill and ventilated adults. J Trauma 2008;65:10–18. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815eba83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hirabayashi M, Fujiwara C, Ohtani N, et al. Transcutaneous PCO2 monitors are more accurate than end-tidal PCO2 monitors. J Anesth 2009;23:198–202. 10.1007/s00540-008-0734-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Onishi S, Osuka A, Kuroki Y, et al. Indications of early intubation for patients with inhalation injury. Acute Med Surg 2017;4:278–85. 10.1002/ams2.269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ono Y, Sugiyama T, Chida Y, et al. Association between off-hour presentation and endotracheal-intubation-related adverse events in trauma patients with a predicted difficult airway: a historical cohort study at a community emergency department in Japan. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016;24:106. 10.1186/s13049-016-0296-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Saunders R, Struys MMRF, Pollock RF, et al. Patient safety during procedural sedation using capnography monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013402. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Egleston CV, Ben Aslam H, Lambert MA. Capnography for monitoring non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients in an emergency room setting. Emerg Med 1997;14:222–4. 10.1136/emj.14.4.222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kupnik D, Skok P. Capnometry in the prehospital setting: are we using its potential? Emerg Med J 2007;24:614–7. 10.1136/emj.2006.044081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kraus B, Ladde JG, Falk JL. Carbon dioxide monitoring (capnography), 2018. Available: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/carbon-dioxide-monitoring-capnography [Accessed Nov 2018].