Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2021 Jun 10;72(15):5569–5583. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab238

Sphingolipid Δ4-desaturation is an important metabolic step for glycosylceramide formation in Physcomitrium patens

Jasmin Gömann 1, Cornelia Herrfurth 1,2, Krzysztof Zienkiewicz 1, Tegan M Haslam 1, Ivo Feussner 1,2,3,
Editor: Yuki Nakamura4
PMCID: PMC8318264  PMID: 34111292

Desaturation of the long-chain base moiety of ceramide enables the formation of glycosylceramides in Physcomitrium patens. Complete blockage of glycosylceramide formation affects growth and normal development of protonema and gametophore tissues.

Keywords: Glycosylceramide, glycosylceramide synthase, long-chain base desaturation, non-vascular plants, Physcomitrium patens, plant development, sphingolipid Δ4-desaturase, sphingolipid metabolism

Abstract

Glycosylceramides are abundant membrane components in vascular plants and are associated with cell differentiation, organogenesis, and protein secretion. Long-chain base (LCB) Δ4-desaturation is an important structural feature for metabolic channeling of sphingolipids into glycosylceramide formation in plants and fungi. In Arabidopsis thaliana, LCB Δ4-unsaturated glycosylceramides are restricted to pollen and floral tissue, indicating that LCB Δ4-desaturation has a less important overall physiological role in A. thaliana. In the bryophyte Physcomitrium patens, LCB Δ4-desaturation is a feature of the most abundant glycosylceramides of the gametophyte generation. Metabolic changes in the P. patens null mutants for the sphingolipid Δ4-desaturase (PpSD4D) and the glycosylceramide synthase (PpGCS), sd4d-1 and gcs-1, were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with nanoelectrospray ionization and triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry analysis. sd4d-1 plants lacked unsaturated LCBs and the most abundant glycosylceramides. gcs-1 plants lacked all glycosylceramides and accumulated hydroxyceramides. While sd4d-1 plants mostly resembled wild-type plants, gcs-1 mutants were impaired in growth and development. These results indicate that LCB Δ4-desaturation is a prerequisite for the formation of the most abundant glycosylceramides in P. patens. However, loss of unsaturated LCBs does not affect plant viability, while blockage of glycosylceramide synthesis in gcs-1 plants causes severe plant growth and development defects.

Introduction

Sphingolipids are essential structural elements in eukaryotic membranes. They constitute up to 40 mol % of plant plasma membrane lipids (Tjellström et al., 2010; Cacas et al., 2016; Luttgeharm et al., 2016). Together with sterols they form so called micro- and nanodomains that are thought to act as sorting platforms for membrane proteins (Borner et al., 2005; Grosjean et al., 2015, 2018). Sphingolipids can further act as second messengers during developmental processes and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses (Shi et al., 2007; Alden et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2012).

The involvement of sphingolipids in a multitude of plant physiological processes likely results from their great structural diversity. All sphingolipids have the same characteristic non-polar backbone with a long-chain base (LCB) as the key element. Plant LCBs typically have a chain length of 18 carbon atoms and may be N-acylated to a long-chain fatty acid or a very-long-chain fatty acid. LCBs that are connected to fatty acids are called ceramides. The chain length of the fatty acid moiety of plant sphingolipids ranges from 16 to 26 carbon atoms. Structural modifications in the LCB and in the fatty acid substantially increase the diversity of the sphingolipid pool.

The simpler sphingolipids, LCBs and ceramides, are low abundant molecules that constitute around 2% and 0.5%, respectively, of all sphingolipids in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves (Markham et al., 2006; Markham and Jaworski, 2007). They are important messenger molecules in cellular functions including programmed cell death (Greenberg et al., 2000; Liang et al., 2003; Shi et al., 2007; Alden et al., 2011).

Most plant sphingolipids have a polar head group attached to their non-polar ceramide backbone. These sphingolipids are referred to as complex sphingolipids and are divided into glycosylceramides (GlcCers) and glycosyl inositolphosphorylceramides (GIPCs). GlcCers contain one sugar residue as head group. Plant GIPCs contain an inositol-1-phosphate with up to seven different sugar moieties (Buré et al., 2011; Cacas et al., 2013). GlcCers and GIPCs constitute around 34% and 64%, respectively, of all sphingolipids in A. thaliana leaves (Markham et al., 2006). They have structural functions in plant membranes and their relative abundance and composition influence the plant’s response towards abiotic stresses such as drought and cold stress (Ng et al., 2001; Coursol et al., 2003; Nagano et al., 2014). The composition of complex sphingolipids likely affects trafficking of secretory proteins and signal transduction through the formation of microdomains (Simons and Toomre, 2000; Melser et al., 2010).

Whether sphingolipids are channelled into GlcCer or GIPC formation is likely determined by certain LCB modifications. After their formation, LCBs harbour two hydroxyl groups at the C-1 and C-3 positions. The initial LCBs are thus referred to as dihydroxy LCBs, or, in short, d18:0 when palmitoyl-CoA is the acyl-CoA substrate. A third hydroxyl group may be introduced at the C-4 position through the action of an LCB C-4 hydroxylase, and the resulting LCBs are referred to as trihydroxy LCBs, or, in short, t18:0 (Sperling et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2008; Gömann et al., 2021). Dihydroxy LCBs are enriched in GlcCers, while trihydroxy LCBs are enriched in GlcCers and GIPCs (Markham et al., 2006).

Another crucial LCB modification is the insertion of double bonds. Double bonds may be introduced at the Δ4 or the Δ8 position by the activity of distinct LCB desaturases (Napier et al., 2002). LCB C-4 hydroxylation and LCB Δ4-desaturation both act on the C-4 position of d18:0 LCBs and are therefore mutually exclusive. The resulting LCBs are referred to as d18:1 or d18:2 and t18:1, depending on the hydroxylation state and the number of inserted double bonds. Sphingolipids with Δ8-unsaturated LCBs predominate in all A. thaliana sphingolipid classes and in most tissues (Markham et al., 2006). LCB Δ4-desaturation, however, mostly occurs in combination with LCB Δ8-desaturation and is restricted to GlcCers of A. thaliana floral and pollen tissue (Michaelson et al., 2009).

The LCB Δ4-desaturases are a class of desaturases that is evolutionarily distinct from LCB Δ8-desaturases (Napier et al., 2002). Knockout of the A. thaliana LCB Δ4-desaturase caused a significant reduction of pollen GlcCers compared with the wild type. However, its loss had no effect on plant morphology and physiology (Michaelson et al., 2009). LCB Δ4-desaturation is therefore considered a less important LCB modification during A. thaliana sphingolipid biosynthesis. However, the LCB Δ4-desaturase appears to play a more important role in other plant species outside the Brassicaceae family. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and soybean (Glycine max), Δ4,8-diunsaturated LCBs are enriched in GlcCers throughout the plant (Sperling et al., 2005; Markham et al., 2006).

The occurrence of LCB Δ4-unsaturated sphingolipids exemplifies how sphingolipid composition is tissue and organism dependent (Sperling et al., 2005; Luttgeharm et al., 2016). This highlights the importance of using appropriate model systems to study individual molecular species and classes. While A. thaliana has been an invaluable model for studying plant sphingolipid metabolism in general, it has limitations in the study of LCB Δ4-desaturation.

To better understand the physiological role of LCB Δ4-desaturation, the research focus should be directed towards plants outside the Brassicaceae family. Islam et al. (2012) analysed LCBs from 21 plant species from different phylogenetic groups to determine and compare the position of the double bond in d18:1. Among the 21 surveyed plants was the bryophyte Physcomitrium (formerly Physcomitrella) patens. The d18:1 LCB of P. patens has the double bond at the Δ4 position, and P. patens therefore qualifies as a suitable plant system to study the role of Δ4-unsaturated sphingolipids in plants.

A recent study described the lipidome of P. patens, including the four sphingolipid classes: LCBs, ceramides, GlcCers, and GIPCs (Resemann et al., 2021). In P. patens there is a clear distinction between specific LCB modifications that occur in GlcCers and those that occur in GIPCs. Over 90% of GlcCers have a d18:2 LCB in their backbone, whereas GIPCs have only a t18:0 LCB. This structural distinction facilitates study of the role of different sphingolipid species in plant physiology. The data further suggest that the physiological role of Δ4-unsaturated sphingolipids is tightly bound to the role of GlcCers in P. patens. A proposed schematic for the metabolic flux of sphingolipid precursors in P. patens was generated based on sphingolipid data from Resemann et al. (2021) and information about sphingolipid biosynthesis in A. thaliana (Luttgeharm et al., 2016, and is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Sphingolipid biosynthesis in P. patens. This proposed schematic for sphingolipid metabolism in P. patens depicts downstream reactions for glycosylceramide (GlcCer) and glycosyl inositolphosphorylceramide (GIPC) synthesis. Dihydroxy long-chain bases (LCBs) with ∆4 and ∆8 double bonds are mainly designated for GlcCer formation (coloured), while trihydroxy LCBs are mainly designated for GIPC formation (grey). Asterisks indicate functionally characterized enzymes in P. patens. Hex, hexose; HS-CoA, Coenzyme A; SFD, sphingolipid fatty acid desaturase; VLCFA, very-long-chain fatty acid; UDP-Glc, uridine diphosphate glucose.

Although GlcCers are the second most abundant sphingolipids found in A. thaliana, their physiological function is not fully understood. GlcCers are generated by the transfer of a glucose residue from uridine diphosphate glucose to the ceramide backbone. This reaction is catalysed by a glycosylceramide synthase (GCS). Arabidopsis thaliana has one GCS gene (At2g19880) (Msanne et al., 2015); gcs null mutants lacked all GlcCers and had a higher GIPC content than wild-type plants. The mutants were seedling lethal and were impaired in cell type differentiation and organogenesis (Msanne et al., 2015).

In this study, the physiological roles of sphingolipids with Δ4-unsaturated LCBs and of GlcCers were investigated in P. patens. The LCB Δ4-desaturase and the GCS, designated here as PpSD4D and PpGCS, respectively, were identified in P. patens by sequence similarity to their A. thaliana orthologs. Gene knockouts revealed an inhibition of GlcCer formation in both sd4d and gcs mutant lines. Although GlcCers were nearly absent in both mutants, sd4d-1 and gcs-1 plants had different phenotypes: sd4d-1 plants had almost no morphological impairments, whereas gcs-1 plants had substantial growth and development defects. Overall, the results indicate substantial flexibility with respect to the amount of GlcCer essential for plant survival, as well as developmental consequences of changes in GlcCer and ceramide precursor content.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

The P. patens ‘Gransden’ strain (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp was used as the wild type. Plants were grown under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 25 °C and with a light intensity of 50–70 µmol m−2 s−1. Protonema was cultivated on BCD agar medium plates (90 mm diameter) containing 1 mM CaCl2 and 5 mM ammonium tartrate (BCDAT) (Ashton and Cove, 1977). For protonema cultivation the medium plates were covered with sterile cellophane discs (folia, Wendelstein, Germany). For protonema maintenance and propagation, 1- to 2-week-old tissue was scraped off the cellophane and disrupted in sterile water for 20 s using a tissue lyser (Ultra Turrax, Ika, Staufen, Germany). The cell suspension was spread on to fresh BCDAT plates. Plates were sealed with micropore tape before incubation.

Protonema material for lipid analysis was cultivated on cellophane-covered BCD plates. To compare measurements of different mutant lines, the dry weight of the disrupted material was determined after treatment with the tissue lyser. All plate cultures were subsequently started with a volume of cell suspension equal to 5 mg dry weight. To obtain enough material for lipid measurements, protonema from eight plates was pooled. The protonema was cultivated for 10 days before harvesting and was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen after harvest. Prior to lipid extraction, the plant material was lyophilized. Plant growth was quantified by determination of the fresh weight of protonema after harvesting and before freezing in liquid nitrogen. Protonema was weighed again after lyophilization for determination of the dry weight. This experiment was part of a larger experiment and the lipid data for wild type protonema were used recently in a different study as well (Gömann et al., 2021).

For imaging of gametophore development, 1 mm spot inocula of 7- to 10-day-old protonema tissue were placed on plates containing BCD medium with 1 mM CaCl2. Fully grown gametophores were imaged after 6 weeks. For protonema development, colonies were imaged after 1–2 weeks. Plates were sealed with micropore tape during cultivation.

Dark growth experiments for skotonema induction were performed as described in Saavedra et al. (2015). For these experiments, protonema spot inocula were placed on square BCDAT plates supplemented with 2% sucrose. Colonies were grown for 1 week under continuous light and subsequently moved to the dark and rotated into vertical orientation. Colonies were grown for another 4 weeks before imaging.

Images were captured using a binocular (Olympus SZX12 binocular, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) or a microscope (Olympus BX51 microscope, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) connected to a camera (R6 Retiga camera, QImaging, Surrey, Canada). Images were captured with the Ocular scientific image acquisition software (version 1.0, Digital Optics Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand). Images were processed using ImageJ 1.52b software (Schneider et al., 2012).

Generation of targeted knockout plasmids

Targeted knockout plasmids were assembled by cloning 750 bp fragments from the 5′ and the 3′ genomic DNA untranslated regions (UTR) of the respective SD4D and GCS genes into a pBluescript vector backbone. The 5′ and 3′ fragments flanked a kanamycin resistance cassette for future selection of knockout mutants. The following primer pairs [forward (fw) and reverse (rev)] were used for cloning the flanking regions of SD4D and GCS: 5′ SacI SD4D-fw (5′-gagctcATGGACTTCTACTGGGCTGAGG-3′)/5′ BamHI SD4D-rev (5′-ggatccTCCTGACTCTAAGAAAGAAAAGTATAG-3′) and 3′ HindIII SD4D-fw (5′-gtcgacCTTCTATGCGTTCAGGCCTCTC-3′)/3′ ApaI SD4D-rev (5′-gggcccTCAGTTGGTTTTGCCATGCTTTGTC-3′). The following primer pairs were used for GCS cloning: 5′ SacI GCS-fw (5′-gagctcATGGCGTTTGTGGAGGCCATG-3′)/5′ XbaI GCS-rev (5′-tctagaCCAATACCTGACTACGCCAATTGC-3′) and 3′ HindIII GCS-fw (5′-aagcttGTGATTTTTGTGAACTCAGTGAAATTG-3′)/3′ ApaI GCS-rev (5′-gggcccTCATTGTACCTGACAAATGTTTCCATT-3′). Correct cloning of the fragments into the destination vector was confirmed by plasmid sequencing. To linearize the SD4D and GCS fragments used for P. patens homologous recombination, the restriction enzymes SacI and ApaI were used for both gene constructs.

Transformation of P. patens and molecular characterization of knockout mutants

Knockout plants were generated via polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation of P. patens protoplasts according to Schaefer et al. (1991). The knockout constructs containing the 5′ and 3′ SD4D and GCS flanking regions and the kanamycin selection cassette were used for homologous recombination in P. patens. To confirm the correct insertion of the selection cassette into the P. patens genome, genomic DNA was extracted from a small sample of gametophytic tissue. DNA was isolated using cetyl trimethylammonium bromide extraction. In a first step, successful integration of the kanamycin selection cassette was confirmed by PCR using the following primer combination: kan fw: 5′-ATGGGGATTGAACAAGATGGATTGCAC-3′/kan rev: 5′-TCAGAAGAACTCGTCAAGAAGGC-3′. In a second PCR, insertion of the selection cassette into the SD4D and GCS sites was confirmed. The following primer combinations were used to confirm insertion into the SD4D locus: 5′ UTR (fw: 5′-GTGGTGTGGTTGCCGTCAAGAC-3′/rev: 5′-TAGGGTTCCTATAGGGTTTCGCTC-3′), 3′ UTR (fw: 5′-GATAGCTGGGCAATGGAATCCG-3′/rev: 5′-GCATATTGTGGGTGCTGATGATTAGG-3′). The following primer combinations were used to confirm insertion into the GCS locus: 5′ UTR (fw: 5′-GCAACAATGTGCCCGAGCAGATC-3′/rev: 5′-TAGGGTTCCT ATAGGGTTTCGCTC-3′), 3′ UTR (fw: 5′-GATAGCTGGGCAA TGGAATCCG-3′/rev: 5′-GATGCAGATGATAAGGAGAA TCTCAGC-3′).

Reverse transcription PCR verification of mutants

RNA was obtained from P. patens wild-type and mutant gametophytic tissue using TRIzolTM reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Total RNA was treated with DNAseI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) prior to cDNA synthesis. A 1 µg aliquot of the DNAseI-treated RNA was used for cDNA synthesis. cDNA was synthesized using the RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The following primer pairs were used for amplification of fragments of SD4D (fw: 5′-CCGGTTGCTTGGCATATTCG-3′/rev: 5′-CAATGGGGTGCATACCACCT-3′), GCS (fw: 5′-CGCGTTATCAGCTCACCAGA-3′/rev: 5′-TCCTTCCC AGGTGACAATGC-3′), and ACTIN8 transcript (fw: 5′-GCTGGTTT CGCTGGAGACGATGC-3′/rev: 5′-ATCGTGATCACCTGCCC GTCC-3′).

Gene editing by CRISPR-Cas9

CRISPR-Cas9 was performed using the plasmid pUC57-PpU6pro-2XBbsI-etracRNA generated in-house. Gene expression was driven by the U6 promoter used in Collonnier et al. (2017). The inserted etracRNA was described in Castel et al. (2019). A dual BbsI site was included in the plasmid for cloning. Prediction of protospacers was done using the CRISPOR software (Haeussler et al., 2016) (http://tefor.net/crispor/crispor.cgi). The sgRNA gcs-1 was designed to target the first exon of PpGCS. Oligos for gcs-1 sgRNA: gcs-1 Oligo 1 (5′-AACCGGGATGGCAGAACACTAAGC-3′)/gcs-1 Oligo 2 (5′-AAACGCTTAGTGTTCTGCCATCCC-3′) were aligned and cloned into the pUC57-PpU6pro-2XBbsI-etracRNA vector. Successful cloning was confirmed by sequencing. The plasmid carrying the sgRNA was co-transformed with pAct-Cas9 (Collonnier et al., 2017) and pBNRF (Schaefer et al., 2010), which carries resistance to G418 (Geneticin), into P. patens protoplasts. pAct-Cas9 and pBNRF were both kindly provided by Prof. Fabien Nogué, INRA Versailles-Grignon, France. Polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation was performed as described before. Putative knockout mutants were confirmed by sequencing of the PCR product using the following primer combination that surrounded the target sequence: gcs-1-fw (5′-GGAGATGCGGTGAGAAGAAAC-3′)/gcs-1-rev (5′-TAAACC CCCACGATCACTGC-3′).

Sphingolipid extraction and analysis

Sphingolipid extraction was achieved by application of the lipid extraction protocol described in Markham et al. (2006) with minor modifications. Lipids were extracted from 20 mg of lyophilized and homogenized P. patens protonema material. The tissue was extracted at 60 °C using an extraction solvent composed of propan-2-ol/hexane/water (60:26:14, v/v/v). Lipids were resuspended in 800 µl of a final solvent mixture composed of tetrahydrofuran/methanol/water (4:4:1, v/v/v). Samples were chemically modified or directly analysed with ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled with nanoelectrospray ionization (nanoESI) and triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) for measurement of LCBs.

Methylamine treatment

Lipid extracts were treated with methylamine solution for the analysis of ceramides, GlcCers, and GIPCs. A 50 µl volume of the lipid extract was evaporated. Dried lipids were resuspended in 1.4 ml of 33% (w/v) methylamine dissolved in ethanol and 600 µl of water (Markham and Jaworski, 2007). The methylamine/lipid mixture was incubated for 1 h at 50 °C. The solvent was subsequently evaporated, and the dried lipids were dissolved in 50 µl tetrahydrofuran/methanol/water (4:4:1, v/v/v). The samples were used for UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS analysis.

Derivatization with acetic anhydride

LCB phosphates (LCB-Ps) were detected after acetic anhydride derivatization using a modified protocol from Berdyshev et al. (2005) and Yanagawa et al. (2017). A 50 µl volume of the lipid extract was evaporated and the dried lipids were dissolved in 100 µl pyridine and 50 µl acetic anhydride. Derivatization was performed at 50 °C for 30 min. The solvent mixture was subsequently evaporated, and samples were dissolved in 50 µl tetrahydrofuran/methanol/water (4:4:1, v/v/v). The samples were used for UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS analysis.

Lipid analysis

Measurement of the molecular lipid species was performed using the UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS with multiple reaction monitoring approach described in Resemann et al. (2021) and Herrfurth et al. (2021). All multiple reaction monitorings for the distinct sphingolipid classes were measured for the putative lipid species having d18:0, d18:1, d18:2, t18:0, and t18:1 as LCB residues and chain lengths from C16 to C28 as acyl residues that are saturated or monounsaturated and unhydroxylated or monohydroxylated (Supplementary Table S1). LCB-Ps were measured in negative ionization mode with [M-H] as precursor ions. Series A and series B GIPC classes were analysed in positive ionization mode with [M+NH4]+ as precursor ions and ceramides as fragment ions. Determination of head-group-specific ions was done as described before (Buré et al., 2011). UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS data were processed using Analyst 1.6.2 and MultiQuant 3.0.2 software (both AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA).

Web tools

BLAST search

Physcomitrium patens sphingolipid Δ4-desaturase and GCS were identified via sequence homology to the corresponding A. thaliana proteins. A BLAST search for P. patens was performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) proteome database (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) (Altschul et al., 1990).

Transmembrane domain prediction

Transmembrane domain prediction for PpSD4D and PpGCS was done using the TMHMM software (Sonnhammer et al., 1998; Krogh et al., 2001).

Gene expression

Information about PpSD4D and PpGCS gene expression was obtained using the P. patens electronic fluorescent pictograph (eFP) browser (http://www.bar.utoronto.ca) (Winter et al., 2007; Ortiz-Ramírez et al., 2016).

Results

Protein sequence similarity indicates that PpSD4D and PpGCS are single genes with similar expression patterns in P. patens

Candidate orthologs of the characterized A. thaliana sphingolipid Δ4-desaturase (At4g04930) (Michaelson et al., 2009) and GCS (At2g19880) (Msanne et al., 2015) were identified in the P. patens proteome via a BLAST search of the NCBI database. PpSD4D (XP_024361943.1) and PpGCS (XP_024399720.1) had 63% and 57% identity, respectively, to their A. thaliana orthologs. Based on sequence similarity, both P. patens proteins are considered to be encoded by single genes. PpSD4D is an enzyme of 382 amino acids. Like its A. thaliana counterpart, PpSD4D does not have an N-terminal cytochrome b5 fusion domain (Napier et al., 1999; Sperling et al., 2003). PpSD4D includes three histidine boxes that are characteristic for membrane-bound desaturases and hydroxylases and that coordinate the di-iron cluster in the active site (Shanklin and Cahoon, 1998; Bai et al., 2015). PpGCS is an enzyme of 518 amino acids with a conserved glycosyl transferase domain.

Using TMHMM software, transmembrane domains were predicted for both proteins (Supplementary Fig. S1A, B). According to these predictions, PpSD4D contained four transmembrane domains and PpGCS contained two transmembrane domains. The expression patterns reported in the eFP browser (Winter et al., 2007; Ortiz-Ramírez et al., 2016) revealed that PpSD4D and PpGCS had similar expression in P. patens tissues (Supplementary Fig. S1C, D). The highest expression was in the protonema, the spores, and the sporophyte generation. PpGCS had a generally higher expression than PpSD4D. The similar expression patterns would be consistent with the notion that both genes could contribute to the same processes. This idea is supported by the P. patens sphingolipid profile identified recently, in which LCB Δ4-desaturation seems to be a prerequisite for GlcCer formation (Resemann et al., 2021).

GlcCers are nearly absent in sd4d and gcs plants

To determine the enzymatic function of PpSD4D and PpGCS in planta, knockout mutants for both single genes were generated by homologous recombination. Seven independent sd4d knockouts were obtained. The absence of the PpSD4D transcript in these mutants was confirmed by semi-quantitative reverse transcription PCR (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. S2A). In contrast, only a single true gcs mutant was obtained by homologous recombination (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. S2B). CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing was therefore additionally applied to target PpGCS. Three more mutants were generated using CRISPR-Cas9 targeting the first exon (Supplementary Fig. S2C). These mutants showed the same growth phenotype as the gcs-1 mutant obtained by homologous recombination. The knockout was confirmed by sequencing of the targeted gene region (Supplementary Fig. S2D). All three mutants had frame-shift deletions that interfered with proper translation of the protein.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Characterization of P. patens sd4d-1 and gcs-1 mutants and analysis of the GlcCer content of P. patens wild type (WT), sd4d-1, and gcs-1. (A) PpSD4D and (B) PpGCS transcript determination by reverse transcription PCR. ACTIN8 (ACT8) was used as the reference gene and water as the negative control (neg. ctrl). (C, D) GlcCers were extracted from protonema of 10-day-old WT, sd4d-1, and gcs-1 P. patens and analysed with UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS. (C) Relative GlcCer profile of P. patens WT. GlcCers are shown with their LCB (column shading) and fatty acid (x-axis) moieties. Dihydroxy LCBs are indicated by a ‘d’ and trihydroxy LCBs are indicated by a ‘t’. Molecular species with unhydroxylated fatty acids are indicated by a ‘c’ and molecular species with α-hydroxylated fatty acids are indicated by an ‘h’. Only molecular species with a peak area ≥0.1% are included in the GlcCer graphs. Please note that this experiment was part of a larger experiment and the data for wild type protonema were shown recently in a different study as well (Gömann et al., 2021). (D) GlcCer fold changes relative to the WT were calculated using absolute peak areas. Fold changes are depicted on a linear scale. The WT is set to a value of 1. Sphingolipid data represent the mean ±SD of measurements from four independent cultivations, each containing protonema material from eight cultivation plates. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. Asterisks indicate significant differences from the WT: ***P<0.001.

Lipid measurements were conducted on P. patens wild-type and the sd4d and gcs mutants to determine their sphingolipid composition. For better visualization of the ceramide backbone composition, molecular species of GlcCers (Fig. 2C), ceramides (Fig. 3C–H), and GIPCs (Fig. 4) were divided into species with unhydroxylated fatty acids (indicated by a ‘c’ before the chain length number) and species with α-hydroxylated fatty acids (indicated by an ‘h’ before the chain length number). Lipids were extracted from 10-day-old protonema grown on cellophane-covered BCD medium and analysed by UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS. Growth on cellophane-covered medium enabled easy harvesting of the filamentous tissue. Previous analyses of P. patens sphingolipids showed that ~94% of GlcCers contain the Δ4,8-diunsaturated LCB moiety with two hydroxyl groups, d18:2 (Resemann et al., 2021).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Relative profiles of LCBs, LCB-Ps, and ceramides in P. patens wild type (WT), sd4d-1, and gcs-1. LCBs, LCB-Ps, and ceramides were extracted from protonema of 10-day-old WT, sd4d-1, and gcs-1 P. patens and analysed with UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS. Relative profiles of (A) LCBs, (B) LCB-Ps, and (C–H) ceramides in WT, sd4d-1, and gcs-1 lines are shown. Dihydroxy LCBs are indicated by a ‘d’ and trihydroxy LCBs are indicated by a ‘t’. Molecular species with unhydroxylated fatty acids are indicated by a ‘c’ and molecular species with α-hydroxylated fatty acids are indicated by an ‘h’. Please note that this experiment was part of a larger experiment and the data for wild type protonema were shown recently in a different study as well (Gömann et al., 2021). Relative profiles of (C–E) ceramide and (F–H) hydroxyceramide molecular species are shown with their LCB (column shading) and fatty acid (x-axis) moieties. Arrows highlight changes relative to the WT. Sphingolipid data represent the mean ±SD of measurements from four independent cultivations, each containing protonema material from eight cultivation plates.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Relative Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPC profiles in P. patens (A) wild type (WT), (B) sd4d-1, and (C) gcs-1. GIPCs with one Hex moiety and one HexNAc unit (Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPCs) were extracted from protonema of 10-day-old WT, sd4d-1, and gcs-1 P. patens and analysed with UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS. Only molecular species with a peak area ≥0.5% in at least one of the three lines are included in the graphs. Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPC molecular species are shown with their LCB (column shading) and fatty acid (x-axis) moieties. Dihydroxy LCBs are indicated by a ‘d’ and trihydroxy LCBs are indicated by a ‘t’. Molecular species with unhydroxylated fatty acids are indicated by a ‘c’ and molecular species with α-hydroxylated fatty acids are indicated by an ‘h’. Arrows highlight changes relative to the WT. Sphingolipid data represent the mean ±SD of measurements from four independent cultivations, each containing protonema material from eight cultivation plates.

The P. patens wild-type GlcCer profile described recently by Resemann et al. (2021) was confirmed in this study (Fig. 2C). The profile suggested that GlcCer formation might be disturbed in the sd4d and gcs mutants. The lipid data therefore served as a second line of evidence for the functional disruption of the PpSD4D and PpGCS genes. Fold changes in GlcCer content compared with the wild type were determined to show the abolishment of GlcCers in the mutant lines. All tested sd4d and gcs lines had substantially reduced GlcCer levels compared with the wild type (Fig. 2D, Supplementary Fig S3). After confirmation of several independent knockout lines for each gene, all subsequent mutant characterizations were performed on the sd4d-1 and gcs-1 lines. In sd4d-1 and gcs-1, GlcCer levels were reduced by 99.8% and 99.9%, respectively (Fig. 2D). More than 92% of the wild-type GlcCer pool consisted of a single sphingolipid species (Resemann et al., 2021). This had a d18:2 LCB that was conjugated to an α-hydroxylated 20-carbon fatty acid with no double bonds, h20:0, together d18:2/h20:0. Minor species such as d18:1/h20:0, d18:2/h22:0, and d18:2/c20:0 accounted for 4%, 2%, and 1% of P. patens GlcCers, respectively. All other detected species represented <1% of total GlcCers. Interestingly, the sd4d-1 mutant still had residual amounts of GlcCer d18:2/h20:0 that might derive from a putative desaturase activity of the LCB C-4 hydroxylase (Ternes et al., 2002). sd4d-1 plants also contained GlcCer species with a d18:0 LCB. However, all GlcCer species in sd4d-1 were present in trace amounts and therefore did not produce a substantial GlcCer pool (Supplementary Tables S2–S4). The residual amounts of GlcCers found in the gcs-1 mutant were attributed to background signals that were used to calculate the overall fold change. The GlcCer results verified the generation of null mutants for both genes and confirmed that PpSD4D and PpGCS are the only enzymes in P. patens that catalyse the respective reactions in the tested conditions and tissues.

Loss of GlcCers and of Δ4-unsaturated LCBs affects the relative profiles of other sphingolipid classes

Sphingolipidomics also revealed changes in the profiles of other sphingolipid classes upon loss of either PpSD4D or PpGCS activity. The most abundant LCB and LCB-P species in the wild type was t18:0, constituting 94% and 69%, respectively (Fig. 3A, B). Lesser amounts of d18:0 were also found in LCB (6%) and LCB-P (31%). The overall LCB and LCB-P profiles were maintained in the sd4d-1 and gcs-1 mutants. However, minor changes were observed in the relative abundances of individual species. In the sd4d-1 mutant, t18:0 LCB was reduced to 91%, and LCB-P to 60%. sd4d-1 plants further had slight increases of d18:0 LCB to 8% and d18:0 LCB-P to 40%. The gcs-1 mutant had lower t18:0 LCB, at 82%, and LCB-P, at 37%. gcs-1 plants also had more d18:0 LCB, at 14%, and LCB-P, at 51%, compared with the wild type. Additionally, d18:2, which was not found in the wild type, emerged as a new LCB, at 4% of the total LCB content, and LCB-P, at 12% of the total LCB-P content, in gcs-1.

In the wild type, ceramides harbouring the t18:0 LCB predominated, constituting more than 90% of all ceramides (Fig. 3C, F). Only minor amounts of ceramides with d18:0, d18:1, and d18:2 LCBs were detected. The most abundant fatty acid, at 52% of the total, was h24:0, followed by fatty acids with carbon chain lengths ranging from C20 to C26. sd4d-1 plants had similar ceramide profiles to the wild type (Fig. 3D, G). However, no ceramide species with d18:1 and d18:2 LCBs were found. The gcs-1 mutant also had comparable ceramide profiles to the wild-type control (Fig. 3E, H). gcs-1 specifically accumulated the d18:2/h20:0 ceramide species. Taken together, the data showed that sd4d-1 lacked ceramides with d18:1 and d18:2 LCBs. gcs-1 plants accumulated d18:2 LCBs and LCB-Ps, as well as the ceramide that is the characteristic backbone of the most abundant wild-type GlcCer species, d18:2/h20:0 (Fig. 2C), indicating that this might be the main substrate of PpGCS. However, this accumulation is minor relative to that of the t18:0 ceramides that predominate in P. patens (Fig. 3). It is likely that there is robust regulation of the accumulation of different ceramide species, perhaps mitigated by ceramidases, ceramide kinases, or other as yet unidentified enzymes.

GlcCers and GIPCs both contain polar head groups at the C-1 position of the LCB. Depending on the LCB hydroxylation and desaturation state of ceramides, either GlcCers or GIPCs are synthesized. GlcCer and GIPC formation represent alternative sphingolipid metabolic pathways and, therefore, the blockage of GlcCer synthesis in the sd4d-1 and gcs-1 mutants might result in changes in the synthesis and composition of GIPCs. This was confirmed in the study of Msanne et al. (2015), which demonstrated that A. thaliana gcs-1 null mutants had a higher GIPC content compared with the wild type. In P. patens, GIPCs with different head groups were analysed. Series A GIPCs include species with one hexose (Hex) moiety [Hex or N-acetylhexosamine (HexNAc)] that is connected to glucuronic acid (GlcA)-linked IPC, that is, Hex(NAc)-GlcA-IPCs. Series B GIPCs include species with two Hex moieties, of which one may be HexNAc, that is, Hex-Hex(NAc)-GlcA-IPCs. Changes in GIPC profiles were most prominent in the Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPC profile (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. S4). The wild-type Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPC profile consisted mainly of species with a t18:0 LCB in their backbone (Fig. 4A). d18:0, d18:1, and d18:2 LCBs were present in only low amounts in the wild type. The most abundant fatty acids in the wild type were h24:0 (53%), h24:1 (17%), h22:0 (9%), and h20:0 (5%). Other less abundant fatty acids had acyl chain lengths ranging from C20 to C26 that were mostly α-hydroxylated. In the sd4d-1 Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPC profile, molecular species containing a d18:1 or d18:2 LCB were missing (Fig. 4B). Otherwise, the sd4d-1 profile looked similar to the wild-type profile. gcs-1 mutants had a comparable Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPC profile to that of the wild type (Fig. 4C). However, minimal amounts of species with d18:2/h20:0 (1.5%) ceramide composition emerged in the mutant. Similar changes were observed for GIPC classes with a different head group composition (Supplementary Fig. S4). To summarize, GIPC profiles were affected to a minor degree, which reflected the changes to the ceramide profiles in these mutants.

sd4d-1 and gcs-1 mutants have altered sphingolipid contents

The loss of GlcCers and of sphingolipids with Δ4-unsaturated LCBs influenced the relative profiles of other sphingolipid classes in gcs-1 and sd4d-1 mutants (Figs 3, 4). To investigate whether the total sphingolipid contents were also affected, fold changes compared with the wild type were calculated for the individual sphingolipid classes using the absolute peak areas of the analysed compounds (Fig. 5). In sd4d-1 only LCBs were significantly increased compared with the wild type (Fig. 5A). sd4d-1 also had a 2-fold higher level of ceramides with d18:0 LCBs and lacked ceramides with d18:1 and d18:2 LCBs (Supplementary Fig. S5A). The total amounts of all other sphingolipid classes were not significantly affected in sd4d-1 (Fig. 5B–D, Supplementary Fig. S6). In contrast, gcs-1 showed significant accumulation of LCBs, hydroxyceramides, and Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPCs compared with the wild type (Fig. 5A, C, D). gcs-1 also had a 25-fold higher level of ceramides with a d18:2 LCB relative to the wild type (Supplementary Fig. S5B). Total levels of ceramides, LCB-Ps, Hex-GlcA-IPCs, HexNAc-GlcA-IPCs, and Hex-Hex-GlcA-IPCs were not significantly affected in gcs-1 compared with the wild type (Fig. 5B, Supplementary Fig. S6). These findings indicated that disruption of PpGCS function influences the total contents of the P. patens sphingolipidome more strongly than disruption of PpSD4D.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Total contents of LCBs, ceramides, and GIPCs in P. patens sd4d-1 and gcs-1. LCBs, ceramides, hydroxyceramides, and GIPCs were extracted from protonema of 10-day-old wild type (WT), sd4d-1, and gcs-1 P. patens and analysed with UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS. Fold changes of (A) LCBs, (B) ceramides, (C) hydroxyceramides, and (D) Hex-HexNAc-GlcA-IPCs relative to the WT were calculated using absolute peak areas. Fold changes are depicted on a linear scale. The WT, which is not shown, was set to a value of 1. Sphingolipid data represent the mean ±SD of measurements from four independent cultivations, each containing protonema material from eight cultivation plates. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the WT: ***P<0.001, **P<0.01, *P<0.05; ns, not significant (P>0.05).

gcs-1 has a more severely impaired growth and development phenotype than sd4d-1

The A. thaliana LCB Δ4-desaturase mutant does not show a development phenotype (Michaelson et al., 2009). Although mutant floral tissue had reduced GlcCer levels, the knockout did not show physiological defects, leading the authors to conclude that sphingolipids with Δ4-unsaturated LCBs do not have an essential role in A. thaliana (Michaelson et al., 2009). Disruption of A. thaliana GCS, however, caused seedling lethality and impaired cell differentiation and organogenesis (Msanne et al., 2015). In A. thaliana, most GlcCer species have either t18:1 or d18:1 LCBs (Markham et al., 2006). Given that in P. patens the d18:2 LCB is the most abundant LCB in GlcCers and that this sphingolipid class was found throughout the plant, PpSD4D and PpGCS were both expected to have major and similar physiological roles in the moss. The sphingolipid data from this study showed that both independent knockout mutants, sd4d-1 and gcs-1, were almost devoid of GlcCers (Fig. 2D).

To perform phenotype investigations in P. patens, colonies were started by placing protonema spot inocula of similar size (~1 mm in diameter) on to BCD medium. After 10 days of growth, wild-type colonies developed long stretched and branched protonema filaments (Fig. 6). After 22 days, the emergence of gametophores was observed. After 52 days, wild-type colonies consisted of fully expanded gametophores that overgrew the protonema. sd4d-1 showed similar protonema and gametophore development to that of the wild-type control plants (Fig. 6). However, sd4d-1 protonema filaments appeared shorter and, in consequence, sd4d-1 colony spread was more restricted than that of the wild type. gcs-1 mutants had much shorter protonema filaments and had dwarfed gametophores compared with the wild-type and sd4d-1 plants (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Phenotypes of P. patens wild type (WT), sd4d-1, and gcs-1 gametophore and protonema growth. Colonies were grown for 7 weeks and photographed at the indicated time points. Scale bars=2 mm.

To quantify the growth of the P. patens wild type, sd4d-1, and gcs-1, protonema was cultivated for 10 days on cellophane-covered BCD plates. All cultivation plates were inoculated with the same amount of starting material. After harvesting, the fresh weight was determined. sd4d-1 and gcs-1 mutants generated significantly less biomass than the wild type (Supplementary Fig. S7A, Supplementary Table S5). After lyophilization, the dry weight of the material was also determined, revealing a similar but dampened effect (Supplementary Fig. S7B, Supplementary Table S5). This result indicated that both mutant lines had quantifiable growth defects, and that this phenotype is not solely linked to dry biomass accumulation.

gcs-1 has impaired protonema cell differentiation

The protonema is a two-dimensional filamentous network that consists of two cell types: chloronema cells, which are rich in chloroplasts, and caulonema cells, which have fewer and less developed chloroplasts. The chloronema cells are the initial cells that gradually differentiate into caulonema cells. As mentioned above, A. thaliana gcs-1 plants were impaired in cell differentiation (Msanne et al., 2015). To asses whether cell differentiation was also affected in P. patens sd4d-1 and gcs-1, a dark growth assay was performed. During this assay, cultivation of a subtype of caulonema cells, specified as skotonema cells, is induced by growing plants in the dark. Protonema spot inocula were placed on BCDAT medium supplemented with 2% sucrose and grown for 1 week under continuous light. The culture plates were subsequently transferred to the dark, rotated into vertical orientation, and cultivation was continued for another 3 weeks. After 1 week under continuous light, the wild type and the sd4d-1 and gcs-1 mutants developed into dense green protonema colonies of similar size (Fig. 7, upper row). After 3 more weeks of cultivation in the dark and in vertical orientation, the wild type developed long, brown, and unbranched filaments that reached upwards (Fig. 7, lower row). sd4d-1 colonies looked similar to the wild type, although the mutant filaments seemed to be slightly shorter than the wild-type filaments. In contrast to the wild-type and sd4d-1 colonies, gcs-1 colonies failed to develop skotonema filaments. Protonema differentiation ability therefore appeared to be strongly impaired in gcs-1 mutants but not in sd4d-1 mutants.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Skotonema development of P. patens wild type (WT), sd4d-1, and gcs-1. Protonema spot inocula (1 mm) of WT, sd4d-1, and gcs-1 lines were placed on BCDAT+2% sucrose and grown under continuous light for 1 week (upper row). Plates were then transferred to the dark and rotated into vertical orientation. Colonies were grown for another 3 weeks to induce skotonema development (lower row). The experiment was repeated three times with similar results. Scale bars=0.5 cm.

sd4d-1 may be impaired in cell elongation

The sd4d-1 mutants had slightly shorter skotonema filaments than the wild type (Fig. 7). A possible explanation for the shortened filaments might be that sd4d-1 cells were generally shorter. To determine the cell lengths, the dark growth experiment was repeated with smaller spot inocula to obtain fewer filaments (Fig. 8A, upper row). This facilitated the examination of individual filaments. The experiment was repeated with the same conditions as described above. Photographs of the filaments were additionally taken at higher magnification to enable the identification of individual cells (Fig. 8A, lower row) and the separating cross-walls (Fig. 8B). A total of 428 cells were measured for each plant line. The mean sd4d-1 cell length (0.17 mm) was significantly (P<0.001) shorter than the mean wild-type cell length (0.2 mm) (Fig. 8C, Supplementary Table S6).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Determination of skotonema cell length of P. patens wild type (WT) and sd4d-1 plants. WT and sd4d-1 protonema spot inocula were placed on BCDAT+2% sucrose and grown under continuous light for 1 week. Plates were then transferred to the dark and rotated into vertical orientation. (A) Colonies were grown for another 3 weeks to induce skotonema development. Photographs were taken at different magnifications. Scale bars=0.5 cm (upper row) and 0.2 mm (lower row). (B) Skotonema cells are separated by cross-walls. (C) Skotonema cell length measurements of P. patens WT and sd4d-1 plants. Measurements were performed on 428 cells for each line. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the WT: ***P<0.001.

Discussion

Sphingolipid metabolism has diversified across different plant lineages. An example is the LCB composition of GlcCers, which differs between plant species and tissue types. The causes and consequences of this divergent evolution are still unknown. In bryophytes and Solanaceae, GlcCers are characterized by a Δ4,8-diunsaturated LCB that, by contrast, in A. thaliana is present only in sphingolipids of floral tissue (Sperling et al., 2005; Markham et al., 2006; Michaelson et al., 2009; Resemann et al., 2021). In A. thaliana, sphingolipids with Δ8-unsaturated LCBs predominate in all sphingolipid classes. Physiologically, LCB Δ8-desaturation has been associated with the response to cold stress and aluminium tolerance (Chen et al., 2012; Sato et al., 2019). However, the role of Δ4-unsaturated LCBs in plants is still elusive. The characterized A. thaliana LCB Δ4-desaturase has a restricted expression pattern and the knockout mutant did not reveal a physiologically relevant function in the investigated tissues and conditions (Michaelson et al., 2009). In contrast to A. thaliana, P. patens GlcCers have high levels of Δ4,8-diunsaturated LCBs (Fig. 1). It was therefore expected that LCB Δ4-desaturase activity would be physiologically more relevant in P. patens. Investigation of the P. patens loss-of-function mutants for LCB Δ4-desaturase and GCS might therefore give new insights into the metabolic and physiological roles of Δ4-unsaturated molecular species and GlcCers in plants. Both mutant lines lacked nearly all GlcCers but exhibited unexpectedly different phenotypes. Although both enzymes are in the same metabolic pathway, their physiological impact appears to differ greatly.

A recently conducted analysis of the P. patens lipidome included GlcCer composition (Resemann et al., 2021). Over 94% of the GlcCer pool consisted of a single molecular species with a Δ4,8-diunsaturated LCB connected to a h20:0 fatty acid moiety, d18:2/h20:0 (Resemann et al., 2021). This finding indicated that GlcCers should be strongly affected by the loss of either PpSD4D or PpGCS. UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS analyses revealed that GlcCers were nearly absent in both sd4d and gcs knockout mutant lines (Fig. 2). The results were consistent with findings from the corresponding A. thaliana knockouts. The A. thaliana LCB Δ4-desaturase mutant had a significant reduction in GlcCer levels in pollen (Michaelson et al., 2009), and A. thaliana gcs plants were devoid of all GlcCers (Msanne et al., 2015).

Michaelson et al. (2009) speculated that LCB Δ4-desaturation may have a significant role in channelling ceramide substrates into GlcCers in some plants and fungi. Indeed, the observed metabolic changes in the P. patens sd4d-1 and gcs-1 mutants were similar to changes in the sphingolipid profiles of the corresponding Pichia pastoris knockout mutants (Ternes et al., 2011). The P. pastoris LCB Δ4-desaturase knockout, Δ4Δ, and the GCS knockout, gcsΔ, were also both devoid of GlcCers. This observation confirmed the channelling function of LCB Δ4-desaturation for the yeast P. pastoris, whereas our study confirmed the channelling function for the non-vascular plant P. patens (Ternes et al., 2011).

The P. patens sd4d-1 plants were devoid of all unsaturated LCBs (Fig. 3). This observation implied that LCB double-bond insertion in P. patens follows a sequential order. The Δ4 double bond appears to be inserted first, followed by insertion of the Δ8 double bond. The d18:1Δ4 LCB might therefore act as substrate for the LCB Δ8-desaturase. Inhibition of Δ4 double-bond insertion therefore caused a loss of all LCB double bonds in sd4d-1 plants. This suggestion is supported by the sphingolipid screen conducted by Islam et al. (2012), who found that in P. patens d18:1 LCBs, the double bond is present in the Δ4 position. Current data is insufficient to conclude whether the P. patens LCB Δ4-desaturase prefers free LCBs or LCBs bound in ceramides as substrates.

Interestingly, although in sd4d-1 plants GlcCer formation was drastically reduced, residual amounts were still present (Fig. 2). These leftover GlcCers contained d18:0 LCBs (Supplementary Table S2). GlcCers with a d18:0 LCB were not affected by loss of the LCB Δ4-desaturase activity. However, in wild-type and sd4d-1 plants these molecular species were present only in trace amounts. Surprisingly, the main d18:2/h20:0 GlcCer species was also detected in trace amounts in the sd4d-1 mutant (Supplementary Table S2). This might be explained by the close functional relation of the LCB Δ4-desaturase to the LCB C-4 hydroxylase. Both enzymes have three characteristic histidine boxes in their active site and are part of a bifunctional enzyme complex in mammals (Ternes et al., 2002). The LCB C-4 hydroxylase might therefore have a low-level desaturase activity that is normally negligible in comparison to that of the LCB Δ4-desaturase but that results in the formation of trace amounts of d18:2/h20:0 GlcCers in sd4d-1.

The loss of almost all GlcCers in sd4d-1 plants indicated that PpGCS preferentially uses ceramides with a Δ4,8-diunsaturated LCB as substrates (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S2). Furthermore, the accumulation of the d18:2/h20:0 ceramide species in gcs-1 mutants identified this compound as a putative substrate of PpGCS (Fig. 3). gcs-1 plants also accumulated d18:2 LCBs and d18:2 LCB-Ps (Fig. 3). These sphingolipid compounds are upstream of the d18:2/h20:0 ceramide species; this result indicates that ceramide formation is a limiting step in complex sphingolipid biosynthesis. The changes in the amount and composition of LCBs and LCB-Ps were relatively minor in both gcs-1 and sd4d-1 mutants (Figs 3–5). Therefore, despite the recognized signalling and regulatory functions of LCBs and LCB-Ps, other changes in the lipid profiles of the gcs mutant in particular are expected to be responsible for its growth phenotype. Future studies that focus on LCB kinase and phosphatase activity might give more information about the signalling function of LCBs and LCB-Ps in P. patens.

Changes in the sphingolipid profiles also affected the morphology of gcs-1 and sd4d-1. Since the sd4d-1 and gcs-1 mutants both had significantly reduced GlcCers, it was expected that they would exhibit similar morphological phenotypes. However, surprisingly, while the growth and development of sd4d-1 were similar to the wild type, gcs-1 plants had dwarfed gametophores and impaired protonema cell differentiation (Figs 6, 7). In A. thaliana, gcs RNAi suppression lines with as little as 2% of wild-type GlcCer levels were fertile, whereas gcs null mutants were seedling lethal (Msanne et al., 2015). As mentioned earlier, P. patens sd4d-1 plants had residual GlcCer levels. Cumulative findings from vascular and non-vascular plants suggest that plant performance and cell differentiation are not highly sensitive to the quantity of GlcCers, but a threshold level of GlcCers might be required for proper growth and development (Melser et al., 2011; König et al., 2012; Msanne et al., 2015). Alternatively, the morphological differences observed here may be explained by the stronger accumulation of precursor hydroxyceramides in gcs-1 compared with sd4d-1. It is possible that these precursors are cytotoxic when present in high levels and may therefore inhibit plant growth.

In summary, our findings show that LCB Δ4-desaturation is an important regulatory mechanism in P. patens to channel ceramides into GlcCer formation. Although P. patens sd4d-1 and gcs-1 plants were both mostly devoid of GlcCers, the two mutant lines had substantially different phenotypes; further work is needed to establish whether these differences are due to substrate accumulation or a threshold level of GlcCer product. Additionally, despite the fact that GlcCers with a Δ4,8-diunsaturated LCB are abundant membrane compounds in P. patens, their complete abolishment did not interfere with plant survival. This puts into question their quantitative relevance in plants. Physcomitrium patens, with its simple morphology and clearly distinguishable complex sphingolipid composition, represents a valuable model organism for future study and understanding of the diversification of plant sphingolipid metabolism.

Supplementary data

The following supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Fig. S1. Prediction data for transmembrane domains and gene expression.

Fig. S2. sd4d and gcs mutant characterization.

Fig. S3. GlcCer content of P. patens wild type and sd4d and gcs mutants.

Fig. S4. GIPC profiles of P. patens wild type, sd4d-1, and gcs-1.

Fig. S5. Total content of LCBs in P. patens sd4d-1 and gcs-1 ceramides.

Fig. S6. Total contents of LCB-Ps and other GIPC classes in sd4d-1 and gcs-1.

Fig. S7. Fresh weight and dry weight protonema biomass of P. patens wild type, sd4d-1, and gcs-1.

Table S1. Complete list of all multiple reaction monitorings measured for sphingolipid analysis.

Table S2. Raw data (absolute) from sphingolipid analysis in P. patens.

Table S3. Raw data (relative) from sphingolipid analysis in P. patens.

Table S4. Raw data (absolute) from GlcCer analysis in P. patens sd4d and gcs mutants.

Table S5. Raw data from biomass determination in P. patens.

Table S6. Raw data from skotonema cell length measurement in P. patens.

erab238_suppl_Supplementary_Data
erab238_suppl_Supplementary_Figures

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Ellen Hornung, Pia Meyer, and Dr Hanno Resemann for generating the sd4d and gcs-1 mutants. JG has been a doctoral student of the PhD programme ‘Microbiology and Biochemistry’ of the Göttingen Graduate Center for Neurosciences, Biophysics, and Molecular Biosciences (GGNB) at the Georg August University Göttingen. TMH acknowledges funding through the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (CAN 1210075 HFST-P) and IF acknowledges funding through the German Research Foundation (INST 186/822-1 and DFG, INST 186/1167-1).

Glossary

Abbreviations

GCS

glycosylceramide synthase

GlcA

glucuronic acid

GlcCer

glycosylceramide

GIPC

glycosyl inositolphosphorylceramide

Hex

hexose

HexNAc

N-acetylhexosamine

IPC

inositolphosphorylceramide

LCB

long-chain base

LCB-P

long-chain base phosphate

MS/MS

triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry

nanoESI

nanoelectrospray ionization

UPLC

ultra-performance liquid chromatography

UTR

untranslated region

Author contributions

IF and JG designed the experiments; JG performed the experiments; KZ performed phytohormone measurements; JG performed and analysed the lipid measurements with the assistance of CH; TMH contributed to methods for CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis; JG wrote the manuscript; TMH and IF edited the manuscript; IF supervised the study.

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and within its supplementary material available online. Mutant material is available from the corresponding author, Ivo Feussner, upon request.

References

  1. Alden KP, Dhondt-Cordelier S, McDonald KL, Reape TJ, Ng CK, McCabe PF, Leaver CJ. 2011. Sphingolipid long chain base phosphates can regulate apoptotic-like programmed cell death in plants. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 410, 574–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215, 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashton NW, Cove DJ. 1977. The isolation and preliminary characterisation of auxotrophic and analogue resistant mutants of the moss, Physcomitrella patens. Molecular and General Genetics 154, 87–95. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bai Y, McCoy JG, Levin EJ, Sobrado P, Rajashankar KR, Fox BG, Zhou M. 2015. X-ray structure of a mammalian stearoyl-CoA desaturase. Nature 524, 252–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berdyshev EV, Gorshkova IA, Garcia JG, Natarajan V, Hubbard WC. 2005. Quantitative analysis of sphingoid base-1-phosphates as bisacetylated derivatives by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Biochemistry 339, 129–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borner GH, Sherrier DJ, Weimar T, Michaelson LV, Hawkins ND, Macaskill A, Napier JA, Beale MH, Lilley KS, Dupree P. 2005. Analysis of detergent-resistant membranes in Arabidopsis. Evidence for plasma membrane lipid rafts. Plant Physiology 137, 104–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buré C, Cacas JL, Wang F, Gaudin K, Domergue F, Mongrand S, Schmitter JM. 2011. Fast screening of highly glycosylated plant sphingolipids by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 25, 3131–3145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cacas JL, Buré C, Furt F, Maalouf JP, Badoc A, Cluzet S, Schmitter JM, Antajan E, Mongrand S. 2013. Biochemical survey of the polar head of plant glycosylinositolphosphoceramides unravels broad diversity. Phytochemistry 96, 191–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cacas JL, Buré C, Grosjean K, et al. 2016. Revisiting plant plasma membrane lipids in tobacco: a focus on sphingolipids. Plant Physiology 170, 367–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Castel B, Tomlinson L, Locci F, Yang Y, Jones JDG. 2019. Optimization of T-DNA architecture for Cas9-mediated mutagenesis in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 14, e0204778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen M, Markham JE, Cahoon EB. 2012. Sphingolipid Δ8 unsaturation is important for glucosylceramide biosynthesis and low-temperature performance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 69, 769–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen M, Markham JE, Dietrich CR, Jaworski JG, Cahoon EB. 2008. Sphingolipid long-chain base hydroxylation is important for growth and regulation of sphingolipid content and composition in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 20, 1862–1878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Collonnier C, Epert A, Mara K, Maclot F, Guyon-Debast A, Charlot F, White C, Schaefer DG, Nogué F. 2017. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated efficient directed mutagenesis and RAD51-dependent and RAD51-independent gene targeting in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15, 122–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coursol S, Fan LM, Le Stunff H, Spiegel S, Gilroy S, Assmann SM. 2003. Sphingolipid signalling in Arabidopsis guard cells involves heterotrimeric G proteins. Nature 423, 651–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gömann J, Herrfurth C, Zienkiewicz A, Ischebeck T, Haslam TM, Hornung E, Feussner I. 2021. Sphingolipid long-chain base hydroxylation influences plant growth and callose deposition in Physcomitrium patens. New Phytologist 231, 297–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Greenberg JT, Silverman FP, Liang H. 2000. Uncoupling salicylic acid-dependent cell death and defense-related responses from disease resistance in the Arabidopsis mutant acd5. Genetics 156, 341–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grosjean K, Der C, Robert F, Thomas D, Mongrand S, Simon-Plas F, Gerbeau-Pissot P. 2018. Interactions between lipids and proteins are critical for organization of plasma membrane-ordered domains in tobacco BY-2 cells. Journal of Experimental Botany 69, 3545–3557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grosjean K, Mongrand S, Beney L, Simon-Plas F, Gerbeau-Pissot P. 2015. Differential effect of plant lipids on membrane organization: specificities of phytosphingolipids and phytosterols. Journal of Biological Chemistry 290, 5810–5825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo L, Mishra G, Markham JE, Li M, Tawfall A, Welti R, Wang X. 2012. Connections between sphingosine kinase and phospholipase D in the abscisic acid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287, 8286–8296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haeussler M, Schönig K, Eckert H, et al. 2016. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biology 17, 148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Herrfurth C, Liu Y-T, Feussner I. 2021. Targeted analysis of the plant lipidome by UPLC-NanoESI-MS/MS. In: Bartels D, Dörmann P, eds. Plant lipids: methods and protocols. New York: Springer, 135–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Islam MN, Jacquemot MP, Coursol S, Ng CK. 2012. Sphingosine in plants – more riddles from the Sphinx? New Phytologist 193, 51–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. König S, Feussner K, Schwarz M, Kaever A, Iven T, Landesfeind M, Ternes P, Karlovsky P, Lipka V, Feussner I. 2012. Arabidopsis mutants of sphingolipid fatty acid α-hydroxylases accumulate ceramides and salicylates. New Phytologist 196, 1086–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. Journal of Molecular Biology 305, 567–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liang H, Yao N, Song JT, Luo S, Lu H, Greenberg JT. 2003. Ceramides modulate programmed cell death in plants. Genes & Development 17, 2636–2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Luttgeharm KD, Kimberlin AN, Cahoon EB. 2016. Plant sphingolipid metabolism and function. In: Nakamura Y, Li-Beisson Y, eds. Lipids in plant and algae development. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 249–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Markham JE, Jaworski JG. 2007. Rapid measurement of sphingolipids from Arabidopsis thaliana by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 21, 1304–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Markham JE, Li J, Cahoon EB, Jaworski JG. 2006. Separation and identification of major plant sphingolipid classes from leaves. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 22684–22694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Melser S, Batailler B, Peypelut M, Poujol C, Bellec Y, Wattelet-Boyer V, Maneta-Peyret L, Faure JD, Moreau P. 2010. Glucosylceramide biosynthesis is involved in Golgi morphology and protein secretion in plant cells. Traffic 11, 479–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Melser S, Molino D, Batailler B, Peypelut M, Laloi M, Wattelet-Boyer V, Bellec Y, Faure JD, Moreau P. 2011. Links between lipid homeostasis, organelle morphodynamics and protein trafficking in eukaryotic and plant secretory pathways. Plant Cell Reports 30, 177–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Michaelson LV, Zäuner S, Markham JE, et al. 2009. Functional characterization of a higher plant sphingolipid Δ4-desaturase: defining the role of sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 149, 487–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Msanne J, Chen M, Luttgeharm KD, Bradley AM, Mays ES, Paper JM, Boyle DL, Cahoon RE, Schrick K, Cahoon EB. 2015. Glucosylceramides are critical for cell-type differentiation and organogenesis, but not for cell viability in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 84, 188–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nagano M, Ishikawa T, Ogawa Y, Iwabuchi M, Nakasone A, Shimamoto K, Uchimiya H, Kawai-Yamada M. 2014. Arabidopsis Bax inhibitor-1 promotes sphingolipid synthesis during cold stress by interacting with ceramide-modifying enzymes. Planta 240, 77–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Napier JA, Michaelson LV, Dunn TM. 2002. A new class of lipid desaturase central to sphingolipid biosynthesis and signalling. Trends in Plant Science 7, 475–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Napier JA, Sayanova O, Sperling P, Heinz E. 1999. A growing family of cytochrome b5-domain fusion proteins. Trends in Plant Science 4, 2–4. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ng CK, Carr K, McAinsh MR, Powell B, Hetherington AM. 2001. Drought-induced guard cell signal transduction involves sphingosine-1-phosphate. Nature 410, 596–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ortiz-Ramírez C, Hernandez-Coronado M, Thamm A, Catarino B, Wang M, Dolan L, Feijó JA, Becker JD. 2016. A transcriptome atlas of Physcomitrella patens provides insights into the evolution and development of land plants. Molecular Plant 9, 205–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Resemann HC, Herrfurth C, Feussner K, et al. 2021. Convergence of sphingolipid desaturation across over 500 million years of plant evolution. Nature Plants 7, 219–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Saavedra L, Catarino R, Heinz T, Heilmann I, Bezanilla M, Malhó R. 2015. Phosphatase and tensin homolog is a growth repressor of both rhizoid and gametophore development in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Physiology 169, 2572–2586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sato M, Nagano M, Jin S, Miyagi A, Yamaguchi M, Kawai-Yamada M, Ishikawa T. 2019. Plant-unique cis/trans isomerism of long-chain base unsaturation is selectively required for aluminum tolerance resulting from glucosylceramide-dependent plasma membrane fluidity. Plants 9, 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schaefer DG, Delacote F, Charlot F, Vrielynck N, Guyon-Debast A, Le Guin S, Neuhaus JM, Doutriaux MP, Nogué F. 2010. RAD51 loss of function abolishes gene targeting and de-represses illegitimate integration in the moss Physcomitrella patens. DNA Repair 9, 526–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schaefer D, Zryd JP, Knight CD, Cove DJ. 1991. Stable transformation of the moss Physcomitrella patens. Molecular and General Genetics 226, 418–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 671–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shanklin J, Cahoon EB. 1998. Desaturation and related modifications of fatty acids. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 49, 611–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shi L, Bielawski J, Mu J, et al. 2007. Involvement of sphingoid bases in mediating reactive oxygen intermediate production and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis. Cell Research 17, 1030–1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Simons K, Toomre D. 2000. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nature Reviews. Molecular cell biology 1, 31–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sonnhammer EL, von Heijne G, Krogh A. 1998. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proceedings. International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology 6, 175–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sperling P, Franke S, Lüthje S, Heinz E. 2005. Are glucocerebrosides the predominant sphingolipids in plant plasma membranes? Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 43, 1031–1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sperling P, Ternes P, Moll H, Franke S, Zähringer U, Heinz E. 2001. Functional characterization of sphingolipid C4-hydroxylase genes from Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Letters 494, 90–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sperling P, Ternes P, Zank TK, Heinz E. 2003. The evolution of desaturases. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes, and Essential Fatty Acids 68, 73–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ternes P, Franke S, Zähringer U, Sperling P, Heinz E. 2002. Identification and characterization of a sphingolipid Δ4-desaturase family. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 25512–25518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ternes P, Wobbe T, Schwarz M, et al. 2011. Two pathways of sphingolipid biosynthesis are separated in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Journal of Biological Chemistry 286, 11401–11414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tjellström H, Hellgren LI, Wieslander A, Sandelius AS. 2010. Lipid asymmetry in plant plasma membranes: phosphate deficiency-induced phospholipid replacement is restricted to the cytosolic leaflet. FASEB Journal 24, 1128–1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Winter D, Vinegar B, Nahal H, Ammar R, Wilson GV, Provart NJ. 2007. An “Electronic Fluorescent Pictograph” browser for exploring and analyzing large-scale biological data sets. PLoS One 2, e718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yanagawa D, Ishikawa T, Imai H. 2017. Synthesis and degradation of long-chain base phosphates affect fumonisin B1-induced cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Research 130, 571–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

erab238_suppl_Supplementary_Data
erab238_suppl_Supplementary_Figures

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and within its supplementary material available online. Mutant material is available from the corresponding author, Ivo Feussner, upon request.


Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES