Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Jul 29;10(30):e00390-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00390-21

Draft Genome Sequences of Two Bacteria from the Roseobacter Group

Xavier Deogaygay a,b, Nathalie Delherbe a,b, Nicholas J Shikuma a,b,
Editor: Irene L G Newtonc
PMCID: PMC8320451  PMID: 34323605

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the draft genome sequences of strains HS012 and HS039, which were isolated from cnidarian polyps that had recently undergone metamorphosis. Genomic analyses place these strains within the Phaeobacter and Leisingera genera, members of the Roseobacter group.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Strains HS012 and HS039 were isolated from artificial seawater containing Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus larvae that had spontaneously undergone metamorphosis to polyps. H. symbiolongicarpus colonies were generously provided by the Nicotra laboratory at the University of Pittsburgh. Strains were isolated from single colonies cultured on artificial seawater-tryptone (ASWT) agar medium (1) at 28°C for 48 h and subsequently were cultured in SWT liquid medium at 28°C for 24 h. Species identity was confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Strains were grown in the same manner as for the isolation for DNA extraction.

Genomic DNA was extracted with a Zymo fungal/bacterial DNA miniprep kit and submitted to the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (MiGS) (Pittsburgh, PA) for Illumina sequencing. The DNA libraries were prepared utilizing a single library preparation method based on the Illumina Nextera kit and were sequenced on the NextSeq 550 platform (2). We obtained paired-end reads (2 × 150 bp) totaling 1,312,670 reads covering a total of 355 Mb for HS012 and 1,817,862 reads covering a total of 473 Mb for HS039. The reads were submitted to the assembly and annotation service at PATRIC v3.6.9 (3) using Trim Galore v0.6.1 (4), Unicycler v0.4.8 (5), and the RAST tool kit (6) for trimming and assembly, with annotation performed via the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (7). Utilizing the EvalG tool as part of the PATRIC-based assembly (8), the genomes had completeness of 100% and 99.6% for HS012 and HS039, respectively. Phaeobacter sp. strain HS012 has a 4.2-Mb genome with a total GC content of 60%, with 26 contigs and an N50 value of 461,505 bp. Leisingera sp. strain HS039 has a 5.0-Mb genome with a total GC content of 62%, with 196 contigs and an N50 value of 60,120 bp. PATRIC predicted 4,108 and 5,137 coding sequences for HS012 and HS039, respectively. For the software utilized, default parameters were used except where otherwise noted.

Based on genomic analysis, strain HS012 is closely related to Phaeobacter inhibens strain P80 (9), with an average nucleotide identity (ANI) of 98% (10) (Fig. 1). Strain HS039 is closely related to Leisingera sp. strain ANG59, a strain isolated from the accessory nidamental gland of the Hawaiian bobtail squid (Euprymna scolopes) (11), with an ANI of 84% (Fig. 1). These species belong to the Roseobacter lineage (Rhodobacteraceae), a widespread Alphaproteobacteria group (1216). Because the strains were initially isolated from H. symbiolongicarpus larvae that had spontaneously undergone metamorphosis, we searched the genomes for bacterial genes that had been previously implicated in the stimulation of metamorphosis. Both genomes lack homologs of genes known to induce metamorphosis of tubeworms via metamorphosis-associated contractile structures (17, 18) or corals via tetrabromopyrrole (19). Whether strain HS012 or strain HS039 stimulates H. symbiolongicarpus metamorphosis and produces other yet uncharacterized stimulatory bacterial products will be an interesting direction of future research.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

ANI genome-based distance matrix between isolates HS012 and HS039 and members of the Roseobacter clade. The ANI genome comparisons were performed using EzBioCloud (10). Numerical values in the matrix indicate percent similarity of nucleotides between the corresponding bacterial strains.

Data availability.

The genome sequencing and assembly projects for strains HS012 and HS039 in this work have been deposited in GenBank under SRA accession numbers SRR13962962 and SRR13962961, whole-genome sequencing genome accession numbers JAGEUG000000000 and JAGEUH000000000, and raw sequencing SRA accession numbers SAMN18268725 and SAMN18268726, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Matthew Nicotra from the University of Pittsburgh for generously providing the Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus colonies used in this work and providing us with significant technical support.

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant 1942251 (N.J.S.) and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Sloan Research Fellowship in Ocean Sciences (N.J.S.).

Contributor Information

Nicholas J. Shikuma, Email: nshikuma@sdsu.edu.

Irene L. G. Newton, Indiana University, Bloomington

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alker AT, Delherbe N, Purdy TN, Moore BS, Shikuma NJ. 2020. Genetic examination of the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas luteoviolacea and effects of its metamorphosis‐inducing factors. Environ Microbiol 22:4689–4701. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baym M, Kryazhimskiy S, Lieberman TD, Chung H, Desai MM, Kishony R. 2015. Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes. PLoS One 10:e0128036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Davis JJ, Wattam AR, Aziz RK, Brettin T, Butler R, Butler RM, Chlenski P, Conrad N, Dickerman A, Dietrich EM, Gabbard JL, Gerdes S, Guard A, Kenyon RW, MacHi D, Mao C, Murphy-Olson D, Nguyen M, Nordberg EK, Olsen GJ, Olson RD, Overbeek JC, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Thomas C, Vanoeffelen M, Vonstein V, Warren AS, Xia F, Xie D, Yoo H, Stevens R. 2020. The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D606–D612. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krueger F. 2015. Trim Galore: a wrapper tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore.
  • 5.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Thomason JA, Stevens R, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F. 2015. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 5:8365–8366. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tatusova T, Dicuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kopejtka K, Lin Y, Jakubovičová M, Koblížek M, Tomasch J. 2019. Clustered core- and pan-genome content on Rhodobacteraceae chromosomes. Genome Biol Evol 11:2208–2217. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J. 2017. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Suria AM, Tan KC, Kerwin AH, Gitzel L, Abini-Agbomson L, Bertenshaw JM, Sewell J, Nyholm SV, Balunas MJ. 2020. Hawaiian bobtail squid symbionts inhibit marine bacteria via production of specialized metabolites, including new bromoalterochromides BAC-D/D′. mSphere 5:e00166-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00166-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Majzoub ME, McElroy K, Maczka M, Thomas T, Egan S. 2018. Causes and consequences of a variant strain of Phaeobacter inhibens with reduced competition. Front Microbiol 9:2601. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martens T, Heidorn T, Pukal R, Simon M, Tindall BJ, Brinkhoff T. 2006. Reclassification of Roseobacter gallaeciensis Ruiz-Ponte et al. 1998 as Phaeobacter gallaeciensis gen. nov., comb. nov., description of Phaeobacter inhibens sp. nov., reclassification of Ruegeria algicola (Lafay et al. 1995) Uchino et al. 1999 as Marinovum algicola gen. nov., comb. nov., and emended descriptions of the genera Roseobacter, Ruegeria and Leisingera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1293–1304. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63724-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cavalcanti GS, Wasserscheid J, Dewar K, Shikuma NJ. 2020. Complete genome sequences of two marine biofilm isolates, Leisingera sp. nov. strains 201A and 204H, novel representatives of the Roseobacter group. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e00505-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00505-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lau SCK, Mak KKW, Chen F, Qian P-Y. 2002. Bioactivity of bacterial strains isolated from marine biofilms in Hong Kong waters for the induction of larval settlement in the marine polychaete Hydroides elegans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 226:301–310. doi: 10.3354/meps226301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Luo H, Moran MA. 2014. Evolutionary ecology of the marine Roseobacter clade. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78:573–587. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ericson CF, Eisenstein F, Medeiros JM, Malter KE, Cavalcanti GS, Zeller RW, Newman DK, Pilhofer M, Shikuma NJ. 2019. A contractile injection system stimulates tubeworm metamorphosis by translocating a proteinaceous effector. Elife 8:e46845. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shikuma NJ, Pilhofer M, Weiss GL, Hadfield MG, Jensen GJ, Newman DK. 2014. Marine tubeworm metamorphosis induced by arrays of bacterial phage tail-like structures. Science 343:529–533. doi: 10.1126/science.1246794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.El Gamal A, Agarwal V, Diethelm S, Rahman I, Schorn MA, Sneed JM, Louie GV, Whalen KE, Mincer TJ, Noel JP, Paul VJ, Moore BS, El Gamal A, Agarwal V, Diethelm S, Rahman I, Schorn MA, Sneed JM, Louie GV, Whalen KE, Mincer TJ, Noel JP, Paul VJ, Moore BS. 2016. Biosynthesis of coral settlement cue tetrabromopyrrole in marine bacteria by a uniquely adapted brominase- thioesterase enzyme pair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:3797–3802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519695113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequencing and assembly projects for strains HS012 and HS039 in this work have been deposited in GenBank under SRA accession numbers SRR13962962 and SRR13962961, whole-genome sequencing genome accession numbers JAGEUG000000000 and JAGEUH000000000, and raw sequencing SRA accession numbers SAMN18268725 and SAMN18268726, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES