Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Jul 19;15(7):e0009574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009574

Distribution and natural infection status of synantrophic triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, reveals new epidemiological scenarios for chagas disease in the Highlands of Colombia

Omar Cantillo-Barraza 1,*, Manuel Medina 2, Sara Zuluaga 1, María Isabel Blanco 3, Rodrigo Caro 2, Jeiczon Jaimes-Dueñez 4, Virgilio Beltrán 2, Samanta CC Xavier 5, Omar Triana-Chavez 1
Editor: Ricardo E Gürtler6
PMCID: PMC8321397  PMID: 34280203

Abstract

Introduction

Updating the distribution and natural infection status of triatomine bugs is critical for planning, prioritizing, and implementing strategies to control Chagas disease (CD), especially after vector reduction programs. After carrying out a control program, the Department of Boyaca contains the highest number of Colombian municipalities certified by PAHO to be free of intradomiciliary transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi by Rhodnius prolixus. The present work describes the spatial distribution, natural infection (NI), and molecular characterization of T. cruzi in synanthropic triatomines from the Department of Boyaca in 2017 and 2018.

Materials and methods

An entomological survey was conducted in 52 municipalities in Boyaca known to have had previous infestations of triatomine bugs. Insects were collected through active searches carried out by technical personnel from the Secretary of Health and community members using Triatomine Collection Stations (PITs-acronym in Spanish). For evaluation of natural infection, triatomines were identified morphologically and grouped in pools of one to five individuals of the same species collected in the same household. DNA derived from the feces of each pool of insects was analyzed by PCR for the presence of T. cruzi using primers flanking the satellite DNA of the parasite. SL-IR primers were used to differentiate TCI from the other DTUs and to identify different genotypes. The distribution of the collected triatomines was analyzed to determine any vector hotspots using spatial recreation.

Results

A total of 670 triatomine bugs was collected, belonging to five species: Triatoma dimidiata (73.2%), Triatoma venosa (16.7%), Panstrongylus geniculatus (5.7%), Rhodnius prolixus (4.4%), and Panstrongylus rufotuberculatus (0.4%), from 29 of the 52 municipalities. In total, 71.6% of the bugs were collected within houses (intradomiciliary) and the rest around the houses (peridomiciliary). Triatoma dimidiata was the most widely distributed species and had the highest natural infection index (37.8%), followed by T. venosa and P. geniculatus. TcI was the only DTU found, with the TcI Dom genotype identified in 80% of positive samples and TcI sylvatic in the other insects. Spatial analysis showed clusters of T. dimidiata and T. venosa in the northeast and southwest regions of Boyaca.

Conclusions

After some municipalities were certified free of natural transmission within houses (intradomiciliary transmission) of T. cruzi by R. prolixus, T. dimidiata has become the most prevalent vector present, and represents a significant risk of resurgent CD transmission. However, T. venosa, P. geniculatus, and P. rufotuberculatus also contribute to the increased risk of transmission. The presence of residual R. prolixus may undo the successes achieved through vector elimination programs. The molecular and spatial analysis used here allows us to identify areas with an ongoing threat of parasite transmission and improve entomological surveillance strategies.

Author summary

Chagas disease is one of the most important tropical diseases in the Americas. Since 2010, Colombia has implemented programs to interrupt the intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus, Colombia’s primary vector. Boyaca, located in this country’s central region, is one of the most endemic departments for Chagas disease. Control measures have been implemented, and the intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus has been significantly reduced in 24 municipalities, according to PAHO certifications. Currently, the main risks in these certified municipalities are the presence of secondary vectors and certain ecological conditions favorable to triatomines. In the present study, we provide evidence that T. dimidiata and T. venosa have become the most common species. We observed a cluster of these infected species in the northeast and southwest regions of Boyaca. P. geniculatus and P. rufotuberculatus were present but less abundant, and residual R. prolixus populations remain in some certified-free municipalities. The overall natural infection index of secondary vectors was 31%, and spatial analysis identified priority areas for implementing surveillance and control actions. We identified T. cruzi in municipalities above 2,000 meters above sea level, which traditionally are considered non-endemic regions in Colombia. This suggested new epidemiological scenarios for Chagas disease transmission in Colombia’s highlands and requires more studies to examine these scenarios.

Introduction

Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) are hematophagous insects that play an essential role as vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas Disease (CD), which is considered the most important anthropozoonotic infection in Latin America [1]. The parasite T. cruzi presents tremendous genetic diversity and has been divided into six discrete typing units (DTUs, TcI to TcVI) [2], and other genotypes found in bats designed as TcBat [3]. Although the circulation of all DTUs has been described in Colombia, TcI is the most widely distributed DTU in this country [4], and which is then subdivided into two major genotypes associated with transmission cycles; domestic (TcI Dom) and sylvatic (TcI sylvatic) [5,6].

The subfamily Triatominae comprises five tribes, 18 genera, and 154 described species, of which the genera Triatoma, Rhodnius, and Panstrongylus contain the main vectors of T. cruzi to humans [7]. In Colombia, 26 triatomine species have been reported, and Rhodnius prolixus is considered the most important vector due to its infestation indices, high natural prevalence of infection and vectorial capacity [8,9], and its preference to live in human houses. This species has been the main target of vector control programs in Colombia, whose efforts have resulted in the interruption of within household (intradomiciliary) transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus in 63 municipalities in 6 departments [911]. However, other invasive species of the genus Triatoma and Panstrongylus have gained importance in recent years due to their presence in homes, natural infection rates with T. cruzi, and incrimination as vectors [1214].

Colombia has a wide distribution of triatomine bugs reported from 465 municipalities, 95% of which are located below 2,000 meters above sea level (masl), and which are considered endemic for Chagas disease [15,16]. However, T. cruzi-infected secondary species, such as Triatoma dimidiata and Panstrongylus geniculatus, have been found in municipalities from not endemic areas in the departments of Boyaca, Santander, and Cundinamarca suggesting changes in Chagas disease epidemiology [9,17]. Nonetheless, the entomological indices related to the risk of transmission are still unknown for these highland zones. A similar situation has been described in other Andean countries, such as Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia, where the secondary and sylvatic vectors, Panstrongylus rufotuberculatus and P. geniculatus that were initially restricted to the Amazon basin have been reported to colonize zones located between 2,000 to 3,300 m.a.s.l. [1823].

The department of Boyaca, located in the center of the country, on the eastern Andean region, has 24 municipalities certified free from intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus, making it the department with the largest number of certified T. cruzi-free cities in Colombia [10,11]. Nine triatomine species have been described, in Boyaca, of which five (T. dimidiata, T. venosa, P. geniculatus, P. rufotuberculatus, and Rhodnius pictipes) have been found infected with T. cruzi. This represents a risk of transmission in the municipalities where they are found [8,17]. Recently, CD cases have been reported in areas of Boyaca that do not have R. prolixus and likely involves secondary species. These reports identify the need to update entomological surveillance to include these other vectors after the successes of interruption programs to reduce intradomiciliary transmission of CD [13]. The present study aimed to analyze the spatial distribution, natural infection (NI), and molecular characterization of T. cruzi in synanthropic triatomines from Boyaca between 2017 and 2018.

Results

Collection of triatominae

A total of 670 triatomines belonging to five species (T. dimidiata, T. venosa, P. geniculatus, R. prolixus, and P. rufotuberculatus) were collected in 29 of 52 municipalities studied. Triatomines were found in 21 of 26 municipalities using active searches, but were found in only 8 of 26 (30,7%) municipalities where PITS were installed (Table 1).

Table 1. Entomological indexes in municipalities from Boyaca, from March 2017 to November 2018.

Province Municipality Triatomine collection type Altitude (m.a.s.l.) Number households visited Number of infested houses Total number triatomines collected Infestation index (%) Colonization index (%) Density index Crowding index
Norte Boavita* AS 2,192 1,031 17 19 1.6 25 0.02 1.1
Covarachia* AS 2,327 705 4 4 0.5 25 0.01 1.0
San Mateo* AS 2,233 401 22 34 5.4 36.4 0.08 1.5
Sativa Norte PITS 2,608 - - 6 - - - -
Soatá* AS 1,988 763 140 324 18.3 50 0.42 2.3
Susacon* AS 2,487 326 11 22 7.6 27.3 0.07 0.9
Tipacoque* AS 1,871 834 22 41 2.6 40.9 0.05 1.9
La Uvita* AS 2,367 35 0 0 - - - -
Gutierrez Cubara AS 357 220 3 25 1.3 66.6 0.11 8.3
El Espino* AS 3,321 610 7 9 1.1 14 0.01 1.3
Guacamayas* AS 2,202 310 5 8 1.6 20 0.03 1.6
Panqueba* AS 2,245 125 3 4 4 33,3 0.03 0.8
Lengupa Zetaquira* AS 1,670 1,257 15 20 1.1 6.66 0.02 1.3
Miraflores* AS 1,513 144 21 21 14.5 16.6 0.15 1.0
Neira Garagoa* AS 1,659 1,123 10 12 0.8 0 0.01 1.2
Pachavita PITS 1,995 - - 11 - - - -
Chinavita* AS 1,809 520 2 16 0.4 0 0.03 8.0
Oriente Sutatenza* AS 1,943 1,289 4 5 0.3 0 0 1.3
Tenza PITS 1,562 - - 2 - - - -
Guateque PITS 1,804 - - 22 - - - -
La Capilla PITS 1,756 - - 8 - - - -
Valderrama Socotá* AS 2,383 548 13 25 2.4 100 0.05 1.9
Occidente Briceño PITS 1,355 - - 1 - - - -
La Victoria PITS 1,478 - - 1 - - - -
Maripí AS 1,272 1,634 7 11 0.4 10 0.01 1.6
S. Pablo Borbur PITS 677 - - 1 - - - -
Libertad Labranzagrande* AS 1,114 1,092 4 7 0.4 14.2 0.01 1.8
Paya* AS 982 490(468) 9 5 1.8 100 0.01 0.6
Pajarito* AS 793 485 0 0 - - - -
Ricaurte Chitaraque* AS 1,569 1,280 3 3 0.2 0 0 1.0
Santana* AS 1,591 1,140 0 0 - - - -
San Jose de Pare* AS 1,519 1,345 - 3 - - - -
Moniquirá* AS 1,669 2,073 0 0 - - - -
Togui* AS 1655 749 0 0 - - -- -
Total 20,529 322 670 1.6 41.25 0.04 1.8

* municipality certified free of intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus. (AS) active search and PITs. NC Not Calculated

However, 19 of 24 municipalities that had been certified free of intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus had triatomines (Table 1). The total distributions of these insects were: T. dimidiata (73.2%, 491/670), T. venosa (16.7%, 112/670), P. geniculatus (5.7%, 34/670), R. prolixus (4.4%, 30/670), and P. rufotuberculatus (0.4%, 3/670) (Table 1 and Fig 1). Of all the triatomines collected, 23.1% (155/670) were obtained in 2017 and 76.9% (515/670) in 2018. Of these, 65.2% (437/670) were adults, of which 71.4% (312/437) were found inside houses. Of the nymphs collected, 71.6% (167/233) were collected inside homes and the rest in peridomicile areas.

Fig 1. Distributions of triatomines collected in the 29 infested municipalities in Boyaca Department (Colombia) between 2017 and 2018.

Fig 1

Grayscale box represent the altitudinal ranges (m.a.s.l.). Yellow circle - T. dimidiata, red circle - T. venosa, orange circle - P. geniculatus, blue circle - R. prolixus and green circle - P. rufotuberculatus. Altitude ranges are illustrated in grayscale. 1-Boavita, 2-Covarachia, 3-San Mateo, 4-Sativa Norte, 5-Soata, 6-Susacon, 7-Tipacoque, 8-Cubara, 9-El Espino, 10-Guacamayas, 11-Panqueba, 12-Zetaquira, 13-Miraflores, 14-Garagoa, 15-Pachavita, 16-Chinavita, 17-Sutatenza, 18-Tenza, 19-Guateque, 20- La Capilla, 21-Socota, 22-Briceño, 23-La Victoria, 24-Maripi, 25-San Pablo de Borbur, 26-Labranza Grande, 27-Paya, 28-Chirataque, 29-San Jose de Pare. The size of circles corresponds to number of triatomines recollected. Big circles more than 100 and small circles less than 100. The map was built using the free and open source QGIS software version 3.4 (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html) and shapefiles were obtained from the free and open source DIVA-GIS site (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata).

Geographical distribution of triatomines

The most commonly collected species, T. dimidiata and T. venosa, were present in 44.8% (13/29) and 41.3% (12/29) respectively of the municipalities where triatomines were collected (Table 2). Triatoma dimidiata was found mainly in northwest provinces (Norte, Gutierrez, and Valderrama), in 50% (12/24) of the municipalities that had been certified to be free of intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus (Table 2). Fifty-eight percent (285/491) of collected insects were adults, and the rest were nymphs. These were collected between 982 and 2,608 m.a.s.l. (Tables 1 and 2). Triatoma venosa was found mainly in southwest provinces (Lengupa, Neira, and Oriente), and present in 29.1% (7/24) of the municipalities certified free of R. prolixus (Table 1), with 83% (93/112) of individuals collected being adults and the rest were nymphs. T. venosa was found at altitudes 1,355 to 1,995 m.a.s.l. (Tables 1 and 2 and Fig 1).

Table 2. T. cruzi infection rates evaluated in triatomines collected in the 29 infested municipalities in Boyaca department (Colombia), from March 2017 to November 2018.

Province Municipality T. dimidiata T. venosa P. geniculatus R. prolixus P. rufotuberculatus
Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%) Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%) Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%) Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%) Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%)
Norte Boavita* 13 4 (30.7) - - - - - - - -
Covarachia* 3 2 (66.6) - - - - - - - -
San Mateo* 22 11 (50) - - 1 1 (100) - - - -
Sativa Norte 1 0 (0) - - - - - - - -
Soata* 185 66 (35.6) - - 4 1 (25) - - - -
Susacon* 12 6 (50) - - 2 1 (50) - - - -
Tipacoque* 30 13 (43.3) - - - - - - - -
Gutierrez Cubara - - - - - - 8 0 (0) - -
El Espino* 7 3 (42.8) - - - - - - - -
Guacamayas* 7 3 (42.8) - - - - - - - -
Panqueba* 2 1 (50) - - - - - - - -
Lengupa Zetaquira* - - 4 0 (0) 7 3 (42.8) - - - -
Miraflores* - - 11 1 2 1 (50) - - 2 1 (50)
Neira Garagoa* - - 11 0 (0) - - - - - -
Pachavita - - 5 0 (0) - - - - - -
Chinavita* - - 10 0 (0) - - - - - -
Oriente Sutatenza* - - 5 0 (0) - - - - - -
Tenza - - 2 0 (0) - - - - - -
Guateque - - 13 3 (23.1) - - - - - -
La Capilla - - 4 0 (0) - - - - - -
Valderrama Socota* 11 3 (27.2) - - - - - - - -
Occidente Briceño - - 1 0 (0) - - - - - -
La Victoria - - - - 1 0 (0) - - - -
Maripi - - - - 4 1 (25) - - 1 0 (0)
S. Pablo Borbur - - - - 1 1 (100) - - - -
Libertad Labranzagrande* 1 0 (0) - - 2 0 (0) 1 0 (0) - -
Paya* 2 0 (0) - - 1 0 (0) 1 0 (0) - -
Ricaurte Chitaraque* - - 3 0 (0) - - - - - -
San Jose de Pare - - 3 0 (0) - - - - - -
296 112 (37.8) 72 4 (5.5) 25 9 (36.0) 10 0 (0) 3 1 (33.3)

Panstrongylus geniculatus, R. prolixus, and P. rufotuberculatus were found in 34.4% (10/29), 10.3% (3/29), and 6.8% (2/29) of the infested municipalities, respectively, and at levels of 29.1% (7/24), 8.3% (2/24) and 4.1% (1/24) in municipalities certified to be free of intradomiciliary transmission by R. prolixus. The altitudinal range of these species was 677 to 2,487 m.a.s.l., 356 to 1,114 m.a.s.l., and 1,272 to 1,513 m.a.s.l., respectively (Tables 1 and 2 and Figs 1 and S1).

We found municipalities with concurrent infestations by two or three triatomine species. For instance, the presence of T. dimidiata and P. geniculatus (San Mateo, Sativa Norte, Soata and Susacon), T. venosa and P. geniculatus (Zetaquira), P. geniculatus and P. rufotuberculatus (Maripi), T. dimidiata¸ R. prolixus and P. geniculatus (Labranzagrande, Paya), T. venosa, P. geniculatus and P. rufotuberculatus (Miraflores) were observed (Table 2 and Fig 1).

Entomological indices

The overall indices for all municipalities were an infestation index (1.6%), colonization index (41.25), density index (0.04), and crowding index (1.8) (Table 1 and Fig 2). The highest infestation indices were found in the municipality of Soata (18.3%), Miraflores (14.6%), Susacon (7.7%), San Mateo (5.5%), and Panqueba (4%) municipalities (χ2 = 943.6; P < 0.05, df = 19), while the highest colonization index was found in Socota (100%), Paya (100%), Cubara (66.6%) and Soata (50%) (χ2 = 47.1; P < 0.05, df = 15), indicating that infestation rates and colonization indices throughout the municipalities are not homogeneous (Fig 2). The highest density indexes were found in Soata (0.42), Miraflores (0.15), and Cubara (0.11), while the highest crowding indexes were detected only in Cubara (8.3), Chinavita (8.0), and Soata (2.3) (Table 1 and Fig 2). In general, 72.6% (487/670) and 19.8% (133/670) of triatomine bugs were collected in the intradomicile and peridomicile areas, respectively, while the rest couldn’t be assigned to a specific ecotope (Table 3). The species with the highest relative frequency inside houses were T. dimidiata (73.1%, 356/487), followed by T. venosa (16.4%, 80/487), R. prolixus (6.1%, 30/487), P. geniculatus (3.9%, 19/487), and P. rufotuberculatus (0.4%, 2/487). Meanwhile, T. dimidiata was the most commonly collected species in peridomicile areas (81.9%, 109/133), followed by T. venosa (9.0%, 12/133) and R. prolixus (9.0%, 12/133).

Fig 2. Geographical distribution of Triatomine Infestation indices in Boyaca department of Colombia, from March 2017 to November 2018.

Fig 2

The map was built using the free and open source QGIS software version 3.4 (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html) and shapefiles were obtained from the free and open source DIVA-GIS site (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata).

Table 3. T. cruzi infection rates evaluated in the triatomine species collected in intra- or peridomiciles in the 29 infested municipalities (Boyaca department, Colombia), from March 2017 to November 2018.

NT (Number of Triatomines)

Species Intradomicile Peridomicile Unknown origin Total χ2 p-value
NT Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%) NT Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%) NT Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%) NT Pools analyzed by PCR Positive (%)
T. dimidiata 356 218 79 (36.2) 109 57 22 (38.6) 26 21 11 (52.4) 491 296 112 (37.8)

33.3
<0.001
T. venosa 80 54 1 (1.8) 12 10 0 (0) 20 8 3 (37.5) 112 72 4 (5.5)
P. geniculatus 19 16 7 (43.7) 12 6 2 (33.3) 3 3 0 (0) 34 25 9 (36)
R. prolixus 30 10 0 (0) - - - - - - 30 10 0 (0)
P. rufotuberculatus 2 2 1 (50) - - - 1 1 0 (0) 3 3 1 (33.3)
Total 487 300 88 (29.4) 133 73 24 (32.8) 50 33 14 (42.4) 670 406 126 (31)

Natural infection and ecotopes

A total of 406 triatomine pools were analyzed for T. cruzi infection, of which 73% (296/406), 17.7% (72/406), 6.1% (25/406), 2.4% (10/406), and 0.7% (3/406) correspond to T. dimidiata, T. venosa, P. geniculatus, R. prolixus, and P. rufotuberculatus, respectively. The overall natural infection index was 31% (126/406), with the highest values in peridomicile (32.8%; 24/73) compared to intradomicile (29.4%; 88/300) (χ2 = 0.35; P > 0.05, df = 1) (Table 3). At the species level, the highest infection index was found in T. dimidiata (37.8%; 112/296), followed by P. geniculatus (36%, 9/25), P. rufotuberculatus (33.3%, 1/3), and T. venosa (5.5%; 4/72), respectively (χ2 = 33.3; P < 0.05, df = 3). Interestingly, pools obtained from R. prolixus were not positive for T. cruzi infection. There were no significant differences in the infection indexes between each species’ ecotopes (Table 3 and S1 Fig). The 188pb fragment was amplified in all PCR-negative samples, and inhibitors were not found.

Genotyping of T. cruzi

Only TcI was found, and both genotypes (TcI Dom and TcI sylvatic) were detected (S2A and S2B Fig). 80% (49/61) of the analyzed sequences belonged to TcI Dom and 20% (12/61) to TcI sylvatic. 85% of the sample sequences from T. dimidiata corresponded to TcI Dom, while the rest was TcI sylvatic. Regarding P. geniculatus, an equal number of samples were TcIDom and TcI sylvatic (50% (3/6) each), and the sequences obtained from P. rufotuberculatus belong to the TcI sylvatic. We did not find a mixture of both genotypes. Geographically, TcI sylvatic was only located in Soata, El Espino, and Miraflores, while TcI Dom was present in eight municipalities (S2A and S2B Fig).

Local indicators for spatial association

According to the global Moran´s Rate, there was a statistically significant spatial autocorrelation between triatomine distribution/infection indices (I = 0.467; ≤ 0.05). The valvules obtained from the univariate Local Moran’s index demonstrated a positive or direct spatial autocorrelation of T. dimidiata (I = 0.140; p-value ≤ 0.05), T. venosa (I = 0.312; p-value ≤ 0.05) (Fig 3A and 3B), infection index (I = 0.135; p-value ≤ 0.05) and infestation index (I = 0.118; p-value ≤ 0.05) (Fig 3D and 3E). On the other hand, in relation to the genotypes, a spatial dependence was observed only in the distribution of TcI Dom (I = 0.240; p-value ≤ 0.05) (Fig 3C). P. geniculatus (I = 0.04; p-value ≤ 0.05), R. prolixus (I = -0.0039; p-value ≤ 0.05) and P. rufotuberculatus (I = -0.017; p-value ≤ 0.05) did not occur in clusters. Moreover, the distribution of T. dimidiata (I = 0.251; p-value ≤ 0.05), T. venosa (I = 0.155; p-value ≤ 0.05) and TcI Dom (I = 0.288; p-value ≤ 0.05) (Fig 3F, 3G and 3H), were correlated with relief by bivariate Local Moran indices.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Maps of the index of correlation of univarite local Moran´s I in the distribution of: A. T. dimidiata, B. T. venosa, C. TcI Dom, D, Infection index, and E. Infestation index. Bivariate local Moran´s I between: F. T. dimidiata/relief, G. T. venosa/ relief and H TcIDom/ relief. Boyaca department between 2017 and 2018. The map was built using the free and open source QGIS software version 3.4 (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html) and shapefiles were obtained from the free and open source DIVA-GIS site (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata).

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Ethical approval (Act No 113 of 2017) for analyzing animal species was obtained from the Antioquia University’s animal ethics committee. All infested houses were sprayed with insecticide by SHB for the elimination of triatomine bugs.

Study area

Boyaca is located in the center of Colombia, in the Andes: 04°39’10" and 07°03’17" North, 71°57’49" and 74° 41’35" West. This department is made up of 123 municipalities, which are divided into 13 provinces: Centro, Gutierrez, Lengupa, Libertad, Marquez, Neira, Norte, Occidente, Oriente, Ricaurte, Sugamuxi, Tundama, and Valderrama. The topography of this area, shaped by the eastern mountains, determines the presence of diverse landscapes and climatic conditions, from highlands (paramos) to hot climate areas (located less than 500 m.a.s.l.). This department has a mean annual temperature range of 22°C to 9.7°C and a mean annual rainfall of 645 mm. This study was carried out between March 2017 and November 2018 in 52 municipalities in nine provinces with a prior history of infestation with triatomines, according to the Boyaca Department Health Service (BDHS) (Table 1).

Triatomine collection and processing

The 52 municipalities with historical reports of triatomine bugs in the department of Boyaca were divided into two groups: the first consisted of 24 municipalities certified to be free of intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus in 2010 and 2017, and those that during the study period were developing activities to obtain the certification in 2019 [10,11]. Cubara and Maripi municipalities were included in this group even though they were not certified but had recent reports of R. prolixus (Table 1). For this group, one entomological sampling per year was carried out through active searches in the urban and rural areas of each municipality by trained agents from the Boyaca Department Health Service (BDHS) vector control program following the National Protocols of Entomological Surveillance [17]. In brief, synanthropic triatomines were sought in indoor and outdoor ecotopes for 30 min each; flashlights were used to look into cracks and crevices throughout the fabric of buildings walls, behind pictures of the walls, behind furniture, in closets, and especially, under bedding material. In addition, BDHS health workers left plastic pots in which householders were asked to collect any triatomines that they found. These insects were brought by householders to the Triatomine Recollection Stations (PITs-acronym in Spanish) established by BDHS to monitor the presence of triatomines. A total of 20,529 households were visited once every year during the study period (Table 1).

The second group consisted of the 26 remaining municipalities, where only the regular community surveillance was carried out (Table 1). Insects were collected in intradomicile and peridomicile environments by residents who sent them to the PITs of each municipality. All entomological samples sent to the PITS from all the municipalities were placed inside plastic containers labeled with the date, municipality, and site of collection (peridomicile or intradomicile), and then transported to the departmental public health laboratory where insects were identified using taxonomic keys [24].

DNA extraction

Specimens were grouped into pools of one to five individuals based on their species and household of collection. For each pool, we dissected triatomines in a biological safety cabinet to avoid contamination. The feces were diluted in 300 μL of sterile PBS pH 7.2 and were used for DNA extractions. Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μL of feces using the Genomic DNA purification kit (DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit Qiagen, Germantown, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Molecular detection of T. cruzi infection

All DNA preparations were screened for the presence of T. cruzi using a conventional PCR targeting satellite DNA [25,26]. The PCR was performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing 40–50 ng of genomic DNA, 1X of buffer, 0.04 mM of dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 μM of each primer (TCZ1 and TCZ2), and 0.05 U of Taq polymerase (Invitrogen, California, USA). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: pre-heating at 95°C for 15 min, 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 55°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 10 s in a thermal cycler [25]. Amplification products were electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel stained by ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light. Samples were considered positive for T. cruzi when a band of 188 bp was observed in the gel.

Molecular characterization of T. cruzi

Positive T. cruzi samples were analyzed for molecular discrimination of TcI DTU of the other DTUs based on the amplification of the spliced leader intergenic region (SL-IR) gene using the primers TCC, TC1, and TC2, as previously reported [27,28]. The PCR was performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing 40–50 ng of genomic DNA, 1X of a buffer, 0.25 mM of dNTP, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.4 μM of each primer, and 0.05 U of Taq polymerase (Invitrogen, California, USA). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: pre-heating at 94°C for 5 min, 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s in a thermal cycler, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. We also used part (PCR directed to the SL-IR region only) of the algorithm implemented by Hernández et al. [29]. Amplification products were run on a 1.5% agarose gel, stained by ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light. TcI was identified in the samples when a band of 350 bp was observed in the gel. For TcI positive samples, SL-IR PCR products were purified and sequenced at the Macrogen sequencing service, Seoul, South Korea. All nucleotide sequences were edited and aligned using CLUSTALW as implemented in BioEdit v.7.1.9 [30], and the microsatellite motif of the spliced leader gene (positions ranking between ~14 to ~40) was omitted as suggested [31]. The highest nucleotide identity value of the sequences based on optimal global pairwise alignments of each SL-RI sequence against reference strains reported for Colombia [5] was calculated in BioEdit v.7.1.9 [30].

Detection of PCR inhibition

The presence of PCR inhibitors was examined in PCR-negative feces. In brief, 1 μL of DNA from negative feces were mixed with 10 ng of DNA from the Gal 61 T. cruzi strain in the same reaction tube to reference the amplification of satellite DNA of T. cruzi, as described above. The PCR was considered as inhibited when the 188 bp fragment was not detected in the gel.

Data analysis

To estimate the risk of infection, the following entomological indices were determined in the municipalities of group one: the infestation index (number of houses infested by triatomines / number of houses examined x 100); the colonization index (houses with triatomine nymphs/number of houses positive for triatomine × 100), the density index (number of triatomines captured / number of houses examined); the crowding index (number of triatomines captured / number of houses with triatomines) and natural infection index (number of infected pools/ total number of analyzed pools x 100) according to WHO (2010) [32]. Proportional comparisons were performed using the Chi-square test (χ2) with a P < 0.05considered as significant. Data analyses were performed using SPSS v.18.0 statistical software.

Geospatial analysis

For the map construction of the distribution of the triatomines, points of the samples localization were visualized in a Geographic Information System (GIS) in the Quantum GIS software version 3.4 Madeira (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html), using the continental, national, and State boundaries (Shapefiles), extracted from the free and open source DIVA-GIS site (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata). Coordinates were recorded from the WGS 84 Datum (World Geodetic System 1984) geodetic coordinate system. Mapping of the triatomine distribution in the urban and rural area of the 29 municipalities was done from the study area. For this, the relative distribution of the collected and examined triatomine species, infection index, infestation index, and TcI Dom genotype and sylvatic distribution indicate the total number of the collected and examined specimens, whereas pies display the percentage of collected and examined species. The spatial data were analyzed in a Geographic Information System (GIS) platform using the open-source (Quantum GIS) QGIS (v.3.4 Madeira), a free and open-source geographic information system software.

Local indicators for the spatial association: potential clusters of the distribution of Triatomine species, infestation and infection indices

The Global Moran’s I index was calculated to verify spatial autocorrelations between the distribution of triatomine species, infection indices, and infestation indices to identify transmission hotspot areas. To identify localized clusters, the local Moran’s I index was calculated. For the univariate Local Moran (five species of triatomine: T. dimidiata, T. venosa, P. geniculatus, R. prolixus, and P. rufotuberculatus; T. cruzi infection index and infestation index) bivariate (five species of triatomine, T. cruzi infection, genotypes, and infestation index x relief), defined the neighborhood matrix using the weights manager tool. The criterion adopted was the queen-type contiguity, with 1 value order of contiguity. Regions with common borders were considered neighboring. To index value significance demonstration, ie, the index value was not randomly obtained, the pseudo-significance test was performed with 999 permutations, and the 0.05 p-value was adopted. In this context, the Moran’s I index tests the null hypothesis of spatial independence in the entire area (Moran’s I = 0), generating a global I value potentially varying from −1 to +1: negative values indicate an inverse correlation (dispersion) while positive values suggest a direct correlation (clustering) [33,34]. Local Moran’s I analysis was performed to determine local spatial association patterns. In addition to showing the dispersion diagram, as in IGM, the local index produces significance and cluster maps to determine the presence, or not, of spatial dependence. The Local and Global Moran’s indices were calculated using GeoDa software (1.12) (GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA).

Discussion

After 24 municipalities in Boyaca were certified by PAHO to be free from intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi through programs aimed to eliminate R. prolixus [10,11,35], we carried out an entomological survey to characterize the spatial distribution of secondary vectors found inside household units (intra-and peridomiciliary environments) in this area. The potential risk of T. cruzi transmission by secondary vectors in municipalities located above 2,000 m.a.s.l. constitutes a new scenario that must be included in regional CD elimination programs. The entomological, molecular, and spatial analyses revealed that T. dimidiata and T. venosa are the most abundant vectors with clustered distributions. Residual populations of R. prolixus in these municipalities certified by the PAHO indicate that the vector elimination programs must be strengthened and continued. The distribution of species, their role as vectors of T. cruzi, and infestation and infection indexes will allow us to identify priority areas for subsequent surveillance and control measures.

Triatoma dimidiata has traditionally been considered a vector of secondary importance in Colombia [9,36]. However, recent studies in areas certified by PAHO to be free of intradomiciliary transmission of T. cruzi by R. prolixus that the epidemiological importance of this species in parasite transmission may be increasing. Triatoma dimidiata was the most common (73.2%), most widely distributed (44.8%), and showed the highest levels of prevalence (37.8%) of triatomine species collected in Boyaca 2017 and 2018 (Fig 1 and Table 2). This species has moved into houses; 72.5% of specimens were collected inside homes, and it has high colonization and crowding indices in the northeast provinces (Norte, Gutierrez, and Valderrama). These data are supported by similar entomological indices reported in Capitanejo and Macaravita (Santander); and Soata and Tipacoque (Boyaca) between 2006 and 2008, using the same methodologies [37]. Finally, the spatial analysis showed that this species has a clustered distribution in the northeast (Norte province), and contributes to T. cruzi transmission (S1B Fig). Triatoma dimidiata is a species with major epidemiological importance in Mexico, Central America, Ecuador, and some departments of Colombia [3842]. Moreover, an essential epidemiological role for this species has been reported in Guatemala and Nicaragua, where it has maintained T. cruzi transmission after R. prolixus eliminating [43].

Triatoma dimidiata is distributed throughout eleven countries and has been reported from a wide range of altitudes, ranging from 0 to 3,100 m.a.s.l. [23]. Most reports of T. dimidiata from Central America and Ecuador are from areas located below 1,800 m.a.s.l. [23,44]. Our survey and spatial analysis results suggest that a different situation seems to exist in Colombia because this species is of epidemiological importance in municipalities located above 2,000 m.a.s.l. Other authors have reported the infection of T. dimidiata with Trypanosoma spp. and T. cruzi in municipalities in Boyaca, Cundinamarca, and Santander located above this altitudinal range [9,17]. Our results indicate that T. dimidiata could become established as a major intradomiciliary vector of T. cruzi, but further studies must evaluate T. cruzi transmission to humans in these highland areas.

Triatoma venosa has been considered a secondary vector species in Colombia due to the frequency with which they are reported inside home dwellings and peridomicile areas [17]. This sylvatic vector is principally distributed in the Andean region at altitudes between 125 to 2,700m.a.s.l. [23]. It has been recorded in eight departments and 87 municipalities where it has been related to acute outbreaks of CD [9,17]. Here, we show that T. venosa is the second most widely distributed triatomine with natural infection of 5.5%, and with a cluster in their distribution in southwest provinces: Lengupa, Neira, and Oriente (Fig 3). In our study, 17% of T. venosa collected were nymphs, and 71.4% were collected in intradomiciliary areas. Considering that previously ecoepidemiological studies in Boavita (Boyaca) showed high mobility of species between peridomicile and intradomiciliary environments [45], the results in the current study could be a consequence of T. venosa mobility in the peridomicile area or a result of a peculiar domiciliation of this triatomine species in this department [9,17]. Therefore, we suggest that both scenarios should be explored.

Panstrongylus geniculatus has been considered recently as a relevant vector for T. cruzi due to its geographic distribution, its record of domiciliation, and association with outbreaks of oral T. cruzi infections in Colombia and Venezuela [2022]. This species, reported in 18 countries, has a wide altitudinal range of 0 to 3,842 m.a.s.l. [23]. Here, we report its presence in ten municipalities in Boyaca, three of which are located above 2,000 m.a.s.l. and found this species infected with T. cruzi. However, we did not find a clustered distribution [9,17]. The overall prevalence of infection in this species was 36% (S1C Fig), which was lower than that detected in other endemic areas of Colombia (58.8%) [23]. Molecular genetics studies of the population of P. geniculatus showed that this species has a monophyletic origin and contains four clades with no eco-epidemiological differences between them [46]. In this sense, the population found in Boyaca could have the same epidemiological relevance as Venezuela or other Colombian regions where this species has been involved in oral transmission outbreaks [46].

TcI was the only DTU found in P. geniculatus. These results are contrary to reports in different Colombia regions, where P. geniculatus was infected with TcI, TcII, TcIII, TcIV, and TcV [14, 47,48]. These differences could be related to this species’ blood-meal source in the other departments, where its capacity to adapt to different food sources has been reported [14]. Finally, the presence of both genotypes of TcI in this species suggests its role in transporting wild populations of the parasite into houses [13,49].

Panstrongylus rufotuberculatus is considered a sylvatic vector in Colombia, where it is present in eight departments and 26 municipalities [9,17]. This species is found in intradomiciliary and peridomiciliary areas in the lowland areas and above 3,600 m.a.s.l. in Bolivia [22]. P. rufotuberculatus has been incriminated as a CD vector in the Andean and coastal regions of Ecuador [50]. In contrast, in Colombia, it has been considered a major epidemiological risk factor in Amalfi (Antioquia), where it was reported as the second most common triatomine caught inside dwellings [51]. Here we report the presence of P. rufotuberculatus in two municipalities from the study area. However, this species has been reported in this department’s other six cities (S1E Fig) [9,17]. These results, including its high infection rate and its exclusive detection inside homes, suggest a high potential transmission risk in municipalities where this vector is present. As far as we know, this is the first time that TcI genotypes of T. cruzi have been identified in P. rufotuberculatus, showing its participation in the sylvatic cycle.

Rhodnius prolixus has been considered for many years to be the most important vector of T. cruzi in Colombia. This species was introduced accidentally into Boyaca and has been reported in 26 municipalities of this department between 2002 to 2014 [17]. Here we show its presence in 10.3% of the cities (Cubara, Labranzagrande, and Paya), supporting the data on the success of control programs and the virtual elimination of this species. However, the vector’s presence in two municipalities (Labranzagrande and Paya) that had been certified free of R. prolixus-transmitted T. cruzi endangers the overall success of CD control programs. Although R. prolixus in this study were not infected with T. cruzi, the high crowding index detected in municipalities where this was the only species found (Cubara) (Tables 1 and 2 and S1D Fig) demonstrates the remarkable capacity of this species to colonize and establish intradomiciliary populations in this region of Colombia [8]. Reinforcing insecticide spraying and vector surveillance in these municipalities are necessary to prevent vectorial transmission of T. cruzi in cities where residual populations of this vector were detected.

In Colombia, municipalities located at heights above 2,000 m.a.s.l. have traditionally been considered as non-endemic for CD [15,16]. The national protocol for entomological surveillance and vector control of CD suggests continued surveillance to identify triatomine vectors in areas below the 2,300 m.a.s.l. [52]. However, we found populations of T. dimidiata and P. geniculatus infected with T. cruzi in municipalities located higher than the cut-off altitude. The entomological indices and the presence of TcI Dom suggest a regular domestic cycle in these municipalities. We suggest expanding the altitudinal range to improve our understanding of the true entomological range of these vectors and future research to determine intradomiciliary transmission above 2,000 m.a.s.l. in Colombia. The presence of triatomines in highland municipalities may be related to climate change, as suggested for other triatomine species [5355]. Further research about climate change effects should be studied for this species.

Several limitations of the present study should be acknowledged, including (i) we could not carry out an active search in all the municipalities with a history of triatomine infestation, thus preventing comparisons and homogeneous sampling (ii) the differences in triatomine collections between 2017 and 2018 were affected by administrative problems that did not allow the early incorporation of health workers of BDHS, affecting the number of operational personnel to collect insects and the activation of PRT. (iii) The blood sources of synanthropic triatomines have not yet been evaluated, and future trials should be carried out to understand the risk and contact events between triatomines and residents. (iv) The present work was not accompanied by a seroprevalence study of the residents whose homes we collected T. cruzi positive insects. Even though BDHS has carried out screenings in school children under eight years of age at the municipality level, there are no data from residents outside the school ages. New serological studies targeted towards residents of infested homes should be carried out to have a broader picture of the secondary vectors’ risk. Finally, further studies are needed in these municipalities to determine seasonal variations in the abundance of secondary vectors to prioritize the effectiveness of control programs.

The interruption of intradomiciliary T. cruzi transmission by R. prolixus in some areas of Colombia has been a major advance in CD control. However, this is an anthropozoonotic disease with transmission carried out by many vector species. The sustainability of successful management programs requires continuous evaluations of entomological data of all vectors that could exploit the available niche after the elimination of common triatomines such as R. prolixus. A sustained surveillance program is essential pre and post primary vector eradication efforts.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Geographical distribution triatomine and infection by species Boyaca department of Colombia.

T. dimidiata (A), T. venosa (B), P. geniculatus (C), P. rufotuberculatus (D) and R. prolixus (E) from March 2017 to November 2018. The map was built using the free and open source QGIS software version 3.4 (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html) and shapefiles were obtained from the free and open source DIVA-GIS site (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Geographical distribution of TcI DTU genotypes, in municipalities in Boyaca department (Colombia) between 2017 and 2018.

(A) TcIDom and TcI sylvatic. (B) TcIDom and TcI sylvatic by triatomines species. The map was built using the free and open source QGIS software version 3.4 (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html) and shapefiles were obtained from the free and open source DIVA-GIS site (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata).

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out thanks to the agreement No. 001088 of 2016 and 352 of 2018 signed between the Health Secretary of the Department of Boyacá, and the University of Antioquia (Biology and Control of Infectious Diseases Group, BCEI). To prof. Carl Lowenberger for the English edition.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors(s) received no specific founding for this work.

References

  • 1.PAHO/WHO. Annual Report of the Director 2019: Advancing the Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas [Internet]. Pan American Health Organization; 2019. [cited 2020 Apr 5]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/news/30-9-2019-annual-report-director-2019-advancing-sustainable-health-agendaamericas. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zingales B, Andrade SG, Briones MR, Campbell DA, Chiari E, Fernandes O, et al. A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(7):1051–1054. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000700021 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ramirez JD, Hernandez C, Montilla M, Zambrano P, Florez AC, Parra E, et al. First report of human Trypanosoma cruzi infection attributed to TcBat genotype. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014;61(7):477–479. Epub 2014/10/07. doi: 10.1111/zph.12094 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guhl F, Ramirez JD. Retrospective molecular integrated epidemiology of Chagas disease in Colombia. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;20c:148–154. Epub 2013/09/10. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.08.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cura CI, Mejía-Jaramillo AM, Duffy T, Burgos JM, Rodriguero M, Cardinal MV, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi I genotypes in different geographical regions and transmission cycles based on a microsatellite motif of the intergenic spacer of spliced-leader genes. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40(14):1599–1607. S0020-7519(10)00256-0 [pii] doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.06.006 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3081674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ramirez JD, Guhl F, Messenger LA, Lewis MD, Montilla M, Cucunuba Z, et al. Contemporary cryptic sexuality in Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Ecol. 2012;21(17):4216–4226. Epub 2012/07/11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05699.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Galvão C. Taxonomia dos Vetores da Doença de Chagas da Forma à Molécula, quase três séculos de história. In Atualidades em Medicina Tropical no Brazil: Vetores; Oliveira J., Alevi K.C.C., Camargo L.M.A., Meneguetti D.U.O., Eds.; Stricto Sensu: Rio Branco, Brazil, 2020; pp. 9–37 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sandoval CM, Pabon E, Jurberg J, Galvậo C. Belminus ferroae n. sp. from the Colombian north-east, with a key to the species of the genus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Zootaxa. 2007;1443:55–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guhl F, Aguilera G, Pinto N, Vergara D. Updated geographical distribution and ecoepidemiology of the triatomine fauna (Reduviidae: Triatominae) in Colombia. Biomedica. 2007;27 Suppl 1:143–162. S0120-41572007000500016 [pii]. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Salud OPdela. Municipios de Colombia alcanzan interrupción de la transmisión vectorial intra domiciliaria de Trypanosoma cruzi. por R. prolixus 2013 http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8847:municipios-de-colombia-alcanzaninterrupcion-de-la-transmision-vectorial-intra-domiciliaria-de Trypanosoma-cruzi-por-R.prolixus&Itemid=40353&lang=en (accessed 3 May 2021)
  • 11.PAHO/WHO. Evaluación Internacional de la situación epidemiológica y de control de Chagas en 34 Municipios de los departamentos de Arauca, Boyacá, Casanare, Norte Santander, Santander y Vichada, Colombia [Internet]. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud de Colombia; [cited 2019 Oct 4]. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tovar Acero C, Negrete Penata J, Gonzalez C, Leon C, Ortiz M, Chacon Pacheco J, et al. New Scenarios of Chagas Disease Transmission in Northern Colombia. J Parasitol Res. 2017;2017:3943215. Epub 2017/10/31. doi: 10.1155/2017/3943215 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5634585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cantillo-Barraza O, Medina M, Zuluaga S, Valverde C, Motta C, Ladino A, et al. Eco-epidemiological study reveals the importance of Triatoma dimidiata in the Trypanosoma cruzi transmission, in a municipality certified without transmission by Rhodnius prolixus in Colombia. Acta Tropica. 2020:105550. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hernandez C, Salazar C, Brochero H, Teheran A, Buitrago LS, Vera M, et al. Untangling the transmission dynamics of primary and secondary vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi in Colombia: parasite infection, feeding sources and discrete typing units. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1907-5 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5131512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guhl F, Restrepo M, Angulo VM, Antunes CM, Campbell-Lendrum D, Davies CR. Lessons from a national survey of Chagas disease transmission risk in Colombia. Trends Parasitol. 2005;21(6):259–262. S1471-4922(05)00104-2 [pii] doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2005.04.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Campbell-Lendrum DH, Angulo VM, Esteban L, Tarazona Z, Parra GJ, Restrepo M, et al. House-level risk factors for triatomine infestation in Colombia. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(4):866–872. dym065 [pii] doi: 10.1093/ije/dym065 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parra GJ, Florez M, Angulo VM. Vigilancia de Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) en Colombia. 1st ed., pp. 127. Bogotá D.C. Colombia. Editorial Sic Editorial Ltda; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carcavallo RU, Casas SI, Sherlock ÍRDA, Girón IG, Jurberg J, Galvão C, et al. Geographical distribution and alti-latitudinal dispersion. Fiocruz; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aguilar VHM, Abad-Franch F, Racines VJ, Paucar CA. Epidemiology of Chagas disease in Ecuador. A brief review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999;94:387–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Abad-Franch F, Aguilar VHM. Control de la enfermedad de Chagas en el Ecuador. OPS/OMS-Ministerio; de Salud Pública del Ecuador 70pp. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cuba Cuba CA, Abad-Franch F, Roldán Rodríguez J, Vargas Vásquez F, Pollack Velásquez L, Miles MA. The triatomines of northern Peru, with emphasis on the ecology and infection by trypanosomes of Rhodnius ecuadoriensis (Triatominae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97(2):175–183. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762002000200005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Depickère S, Durán P, López R, Chávez T. Presence of intradomicile colonies of the triatomine bug Panstrongylus rufotuberculatus in Muñecas, La Paz, Bolivia. Acta tropica. 2011;117(2):97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ceccarelli S, Balsalobre A, Medone P, Cano ME, Gonçalves RG, Feliciangeli D, et al. DataTri, a database of American triatomine species occurrence. Scientific data. 2018;5:180071. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lent H, Wigodzinsky P. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) and their significance as vector of Chagas disease. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 163:123–520. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moser DR, Kirchhoff LV, Donelson JE. Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi by DNA amplification using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(7):1477–1482. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1477-1482.1989 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC267598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ramírez JD, Guhl F, Rendón LM, Rosas F, Marin-Neto JA, Morillo CA. Chagas cardiomyopathy manifestations and Trypanosoma cruzi genotypes circulating in chronic Chagasic patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2010. 4(11), e899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Souto RP, Fernandes O, Macedo AM, Campbell DA, Zingales B. DNA markers define two major phylogenetic lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996;83(2):141–152. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(96)02755-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ramírez JD, Guhl F, Umezawa ES, Morillo CA, Rosas F, Marin-Neto JA, et al. Evaluation of adult chronic Chagas’ heart disease diagnosis by molecular and serological methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(12):3945–3951. JCM.01601-09 [pii] doi: 10.1128/JCM.01601-09 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2786654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hernández C, Cucunubá Z, Flórez C, Olivera M, Valencia C, Zambrano P, et al. Molecular diagnosis of Chagas disease in Colombia: parasitic loads and discrete typing units in patients from acute and chronic phases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(9):e0004997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tomasini N, Lauthier JJ, Monje MM, Ragone PG, Alberti AM, Perez C, et al. Interest and limitations of Spliced Leader Intergenic Region sequences for analyzing Trypanosoma cruzi I phylogenetic diversity in the Argentinean Chaco. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11(2):300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.WHO. Expert Committee on the Control of Chagas Disease, & World Health Organization. Technical Report No. 811. WHO. 1991. [PubMed]
  • 33.Barbosa DS, Belo VS, Rangel MES, Werneck GL. Spatial analysis for identification of priority areas for surveillance and control in a visceral leishmaniasis endemic area in Brazil. Acta Tropica. 2014;131:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ribeiro G, Dos Santos CG, Lanza F, Reis J, Vaccarezza F, Diniz C, et al. Wide distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected triatomines in the State of Bahia, Brazil. Parasites vectors. 2019;12(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3849-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Minsalud.gov.co [Internet]. Diez municipios próximos a ser certificados como libres de transmisión de la enfermedad de Chagas;2013 [Cited 2013 07 Aug] Available from: http://www.minsalud.gov.co.
  • 36.Parra-Henao G, Angulo VM, Osorio L, Jaramillo-O N. Geographic Distribution and Ecology of Triatoma dimidiata (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Colombia. J Med Entomol. 2016;53(1):122–129. Epub 2015/10/19. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjv163 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Parra-Henao G, Cardona ÁS, Quirós-Gómez O, Angulo V, Alexander N. House-level risk factors for Triatoma dimidiata infestation in Colombia. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2015. 92(1), 193–200. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dumonteil E, Gourbiére S. Predicting triatoma dimidiata abundance and infection rate: a risk map for natural transmission of chagas disease in the yucatan peninsula of Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70(5):514–519. 70/5/514 [pii]. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Barbu C, Dumonteil E, Gourbière S. Optimization of control strategies for non-domiciliated Triatoma dimidiata, Chagas disease vector in the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(4):e416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000416 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2664331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bargues MD, Klisiowicz DR, Gonzalez-Candelas F, Ramsey JM, Monroy C, Ponce C, et al. Phylogeography and genetic variation of Triatoma dimidiata, the main Chagas disease vector in Central America, and its position within the genus Triatoma. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(5):e233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000233 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2330091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lima-Cordón RA, Stevens L, Ortíz ES, Rodas GA, Castellanos S, Rodas A, et al. Implementation science: Epidemiology and feeding profiles of the Chagas vector Triatoma dimidiata prior to Ecohealth intervention for three locations in Central America. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(11):e0006952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gómez-Palacio A, Triana O. Molecular evidence of demographic expansion of the chagas disease vector Triatoma dimidiata (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) in Colombia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(3):e2734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002734 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3953067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hashimoto K, Cordon-Rosales C, Trampe R, Kawabata M. Impact of single and multiple residual sprayings of pyrethroid insecticides against Triatoma dimidiata (Reduviiade; Triatominae), the principal vector of Chagas disease in Jutiapa, Guatemala. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(2):226–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wong YY, Macias KJS, Martínez DG, Solorzano LF, Ramirez-Sierra MJ, Herrera C, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Trypanosoma cruzi and Triatoma dimidiata in costal Ecuador. Infect Genet Evolution. 2016;41:207–212. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vargas E, Espitia C, Patiño C, Pinto N, Aguilera G, Jaramillo C, et al. Genetic structure of Triatoma venosa (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): molecular and morphometric evidence. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101(1):39–45. S0074-02762006000100008 [pii] /S0074-02762006000100008. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762006000100008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Caicedo-Garzon V, Salgado-Roa FC, Sanchez-Herrera M, Hernandez C, Arias-Giraldo LM, Garcia L, et al. Genetic diversification of Panstrongylus geniculatus (Reduviidae: Triatominae) in northern South America. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223963. Epub 2019/10/18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223963 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6797096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Reyes-Lugo M. Panstrongylus geniculatus Latreille 1811 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae), vector de la enfermedad de Chagas en el ambiente domiciliario del centro-norte de Venezuela. Biomedica. 2009;20(3):180–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wolff M, Castillo D. Evidencias de domesticación y aspectos biológicos de Panstrongylus geniculatus (Latreille, 1811) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Acta Entomol Chil. 2000;24(77–83). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Leon CM, Hernandez C, Montilla M, Ramirez JD. Retrospective distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi I genotypes in Colombia. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110(3):387–393. Epub 2015/05/07. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760140402 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4489476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abad-Franch F, Aguilar V. Control de la enfermedad de Chagas en el Ecuador. OPS/OMS-Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. 2002;70pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wolff M, Castillo D, Uribe J, Arboleda J. Tripanosomiasis americana: determinación de riesgo epidemiológico de transmisión en el municipio de Amalfi, Antioquia. Latreia. 2001;14(2):111–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ministerio de Protección Social, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Gestión para la vigilancia entomológica y control de la transmisión de la enfermedad de chagas. Bogotá, D. C: Instituto Nacional de Salud; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Luz C, Fargues J, Grunewald J. Development of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) under constant and cyclic conditions of temperature and humidity. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999;94(3):403–409. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761999000300022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Roca MJ, Lazzari CR. Effects of relative humidity on the haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans: hygropreference and eclosion success. J Insect Physiol. 1994;40(10):901–907. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gage KL, Burkot TR, Eisen RJ, Hayes EB. Climate and vector borne diseases. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5):436–450. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009574.r001

Decision Letter 0

Ricardo E Gürtler, Eric Dumonteil

16 Sep 2020

Dear Dr Cantillo,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Distribution and Natural infection of Synantrophic Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi reveals new epidemiological scenarios for Chagas disease in highlands of Colombia" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Ricardo E. Gürtler

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Eric Dumonteil

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The submitted article has a descriptive approach. The aim of the study is clear though the objectives could be refined for sake of clarity. Overall, the study design is appropriate to address the stated objectives. However, it is necessary to clarify the study population, give more details on the study design and some of the estimated indices. Additionally, I would suggest including a new PCR assay to differentiate all DTUs. Authors could better exploit the impressive amount of data collected with further spatial analysis. See my general comments.

Authors report having an approved protocol to analyze animal species.

Reviewer #2: The methods are in accordance with the objectives: the numbers of the samples are appropriate; there are no concerns about ehtical or regulatory requirements

Reviewer #3: see attached comments

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The results presented are in accordance with the planned analyzes.

See my general comments.

Reviewer #2: The obtained results match with the analysis plan. Some reccomendations were made in the comments below.

Legends need review, also the quality of the figs need to be improved

Reviewer #3: see attached comments

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: The discussion and conclusion could be improved by making a comparison of this problem with other countries, regions and vector species. The authors did not mention any limitations of the study.

See my general comments.

Reviewer #2: Conclusions are supported by the data and a few corrections in the disscussion were recommended

Reviewer #3: see attached comments

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Please correct some typos, also please use italics for specific name and the correct word is "species" not "specie".

Please review the use of decimals throughout the work.

Please provide the necessary information in the figures to avoid having to go back to M&M.

Table 1. I think there is a mistake in the name of the column “Number of infected houses”. Please explain as footnotes what “-” means, the same to “Number household” column and “*” in municipality.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: see attached comments

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: The authors of the manuscript entitled "Distribution and Natural infection of Synantrophic Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi reveals new epidemiological scenarios for Chagas disease in highlands of Colombia" propose to describe the distribution of secondary vectors of Chagas disease after the quasi-elimination of the main vector in the Department of Boyaca, Colombia and thus assess the risk of vector transmission by them. The authors obtain infestation data and bugs from approximately 14,000 houses, using two different collection methods. In addition, authors evaluate the infection status, the frequency of T. cruzi genotypes, and map all this information at the municipality level. This topic was also described in seven other departments of Colombia by Hernandez et al. (2016) and I think it could be suggested as a widespread pattern in this country. I believe that the collected data and in part the proposed analysis have strong potential from the point of view of public health for the country and Chagas disease research in general. However, there are a number of issues that need to be addressed or clarified before publication.

Introduction:

The authors could present a general aspects of the topic including bibliography on other countries and vector species. Also, include reference of the altitudinal distribution of the studied species.

M&M:

Additional information on study area should be included. How were municipalities selected? There is not information on infestation by these vector species for the area before this study. It is not clear how many municipalities were certified by PAHO and the reference provided it does not seem to match.

The study design should be clarified. The 29 municipalities were divided into two groups according to the vector capture method, but it is not clear which municipalities was included in which group. It is necessary to clarify the entomological evaluation carried out for the second group and if it was used to estimate the infestation index despite the fact that the capture method differs between groups.

The authors estimate an infection index through the examination of a pool of triatomines collected in the same house. However, it is not clear how it was calculated. Justify why the authors decided to use this infection index and not an insect prevalence of infection. Please revise if the informed estimation is an index or a real rate as it is called in the discussion.

The authors mention that they use the TCC-TC1-TC2 primers as described in Burgos et al. 2007 to discriminate TcI from the rest of the UDTs instead of Souto et al. 1996. This proposed protocol does not allow to differentiate TcI from TcIII or TcIV, because no amplification product is expected for the latest UDTs. In order to differentiate all UDTs I suggest reviewing the publication by Marcet el al. 2006., or reviewing again Burgos et al. 2007.

In my opinion, the authors could give more support to the results including new statistical analyzes to evaluate the potential aggregation or association of the distribution of insects, as well as of the infestation and infection index.

Line 351-352 says “Mapping of the triatomine distribution in the urban area of the 29 municipalities from the study area”. Were only urban houses mapped?

Why was the blood meal source not considered in this study?

Results:

Please consider including other types of graphs, like bar ones, they will probably improve the comparison among vector species.

Why do the authors estimate the infestation index by grouping all species despite different vectors could imply different risk for transmission?

Discussion:

The discussion could be improved by including a more general overview of the problem and including comparisons with other studies involving the same or other vector species, both within Colombia and at the regional / global level.

The finding of T. dimidiata and P. geniculatus in municipalities located above their altitudinal range of distribution is very interesting as the authors pointed out. However, I found that in Guhl et al. 2007 (Reference 9) both species were previously found in these municipalities and were also found infected with T. cruzi. Please clarify this point.

How do the authors interpret the risk of transmission by secondary vectors suggested with the almost nil seroprevalence in humans under 18 years old in the study area? Does the seroprevalence study match spatially with the area of greatest infestation detected in this work?

The authors should include some limitations that they consider for the study.

There is a problem with the references cited. In some cases, it does not seem to support the text (eg Line 241: Cura et al. for altitudinal distribution of vector species; Line 200, references number 28 and 29; Line 243 Reference 36), and it seems that there is an error in the references order. I suggest reviewing them exhaustively.

I suggest avoiding the writing of textually similar phrases from recent works published by the main author. For example the final sentence of the discussion and the abstract.

Reviewer #2: Review: Plos Tropical Neglected Diseases

Manuscript

General Comments: The manuscript entitled “Distribution and Natural infection of Synantrophic Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi reveals new epidemiological scenarios for Chagas disease in highlands of Colombia” presents relevant information on several species vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi in the Boyaca department of Colombia. The subject of the manuscript is in accordance and in the scope of PTND. However, several corrections and a new revised version must be considered before its acceptance for publication.

Specific comments: Editorial corrections must be made throughout the manuscript.

English review is deeply recommended

Scientific names must be written in full in the beginning of a sentence or paragraph. Please check the scientific names throughout the manuscript. For example, check the lines 198, 215

Results / Discussion: Why a huge difference in the numbers of triatomines collected: “ Finally, 23.1% (155/670) of triatomines were collected in 2017 and 76.9% (515/670) in 2018.” This issue must be clarified and properly discussed

Line 107 specie should be corrected: species; not just in this specific line but, throughout the whole manuscript

Line 111 was founding should be corrected

Discussion

It would be interesting giving a broader view on the diversity of the Colombian triatomine vectors, for instance, mentioning how many species are recorded in the country, and how many of them are sylvatic however, eventually invade domiciles

Line 154 needs a reference

Review the sentence 170-180

Line 196 replace ”theory“ by “possibility”

Materials and Methods

Line 284- Replace the “niche” by “ecotopes”

References: need extensive review

Figs: Written information in the figs must be edited for better quality of the image

Legends: Tables 1-3 Should include ‘Colombia” all legends should be auto explanatory

Figures caption: should be revised

Reviewer #3: see attached comments

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-methods

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review.docx

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009574.r003

Decision Letter 1

Eric Dumonteil

14 Apr 2021

Dear Dr Cantillo,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Distribution and Natural Infection Status of Synantrophic Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), Vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, Reveals New Epidemiological Scenarios for Chagas Disease in the Highlands of Colombia" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Eric Dumonteil, Ph.D.

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Eric Dumonteil

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: See Summary and General Comments

Reviewer #2: Objectives are clearly presented and M&M are pertinent and well described. The semple size is suficient. This second version is much better however, a few issues are still to be corrected.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: See Summary and General Comments

Reviewer #2: The analysis of the data presented are clear, figs and tabs are sufficient and in good quality

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: See Summary and General Comments

Reviewer #2: Conclusions are in accordance to the obtained results and brings relevant recomendations.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Please check general comments bellow.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: The authors made strides in the readability of the manuscript (ms) and overall ms has improved a lot. However, there are still several important corrections and some issues that need to be clarified before the ms can be accepted for publication.

Introduction

• I find somehow confusing how the certification of the municipalities from Boyacá department is named throughout the manuscript. Which is the correct epidemiological scenario: free of intra-domestic transmission; free of domestic R. prolixus; free of R. prolixus? Reference 24 refers to the certification of the interruption of the domiciliary transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi by Rhodnius prolixus. In the same way, please check if references 10 and 11 support the sentence on line 71-73. Is the statement “whose efforts have resulted in the certified elimination of domestic R. prolixus in 63 municipalities in 6 departments” correct?

Results

• The selection of municipalities remains a little confusing. In Mat&Met and at the beginning of the Results, the authors indicate that 52 municipalities were included in the study and were divided into two groups. However triatomines were found only in 29 municipalities. So, later in results the authors indicate that the municipalities studied are the 29 in which infestation was found. Is this correct? I would suggest including the municipalities from the first group in which no infestation was found for the calculations of the entomological indices.

• Line 106, please indicate what proportion of adult insects were found intradomicile.

• Line 146. I think the appropriate metric is "relative frequency" rather than "distribution", and it could be biased by the abundance of T. dimidiate. On the other hand, if the proportion of vectors of a given species found intradomicile was calculated, it would show that 100% of the R. prolixus were captured in this ecotope. Could this metric be more informative?

• Line 161, Table 3 and Fig SI The statistical test employed to evaluate significant differences is missing.

Discussion

• The ending of the first paragraph of the discussion should be improved. I do not understand how the diversity of triatomines will allow the identification of areas of action. Other named characteristics such as vector role in the transmission, species distribution, levels of infestation and infection could serve to stratify the areas according to risk of transmission.

• I suggest closing the manuscript with a paragraph of conclusions. For instance, the relevance of the herein presented results for the maintenance of transmission control in Colombia and other countries in similar situations could be included.

• Line 203, which are the previous levels of intra-domestic infestation by T. dimidiata in Boyaca or other places? Without this piece of information how can the authors support the hypothesize of “an advanced domiciliation process”? Could dwellers bias their catches towards this ecotope as has been recorded for T. infestans?

• Line 220-222. The results of this work, although very interesting, suggest the participation of these vectors in domestic transmission. In my opinion new studies are needed to assess the risk of infection in humans.

• Line 265, the results presented "suggest" a high transmission risk.

• Line 288-290,

“We suggest expanding the altitudinal range to improve our understanding of the true entomological range of these vectors.”

It has already been reported that these species have a higher altitudinal distribution than 2000 masl (in Colombia and other countries). May be, what merits further research is to describe the domestic transmission above 2000 masl in Colombia.

• Line 299-303. What was the seroprevalence obtained by the 2019 BDHS study in children under 8 years of age?

M&M:

• I think it could be useful to clarify the definition of "intra-domestic" and "domestic"

• There is something wrong in the expression of the inclusion of both municipalities (i.e. Maripi and Cubara). On the other hand, Table 1 does not show infestation data for R. prolixus

Minor comments

• Line 70 please replace with “natural infection rates”. Also, I think reference 9 is better for this sentence than reference 8.

• Line 77, I think the authors want to say “below 2,000 m.a.s.l.”

• Line 101, “19 of these had been certified….(Table 1)” But in table 1 only 18 are marked with asterisk. Also, Maripi and Cubara are not marked with an asterisk.

• Line 105, Table 2 does not indicate the number of collected triamones.

• Line 139, please eliminate the phrase “suggesting that infestation rates in the cities are not homogeneous”

• Line 140, the sentence “The highest colonization indexes were found in Socota (100), Paya (100), Cubara (66.6), and Soata (50.1)” repeats the information given in lines 136-137.

• Line 165, please replace for “Figure S2A and S2B”

• Line 166, please check the text font.

• Line 187, the word "transmission" is repeated.

• Line 189, consider using the term “distribution” rather than “concentration”

• Line 190, please include “The risk of T. cruzi by secondary vectors”

• Line 207, please rephrase as a conditional sentence.

• Line 354, please check the appropiateness of reference 20 in this sentence. Also for reference 28 (Ramirez 2010 must be included).

Reviewer #2: Plos NTD

Manuscript

General Comments:

The manuscript entitled: “ Distribution and Natural Infection Status of Synantrophic Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), Vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, Reveals New Epidemiological Scenarios for Chagas Disease in the Highlands of Colombia” has improved significantly. However, before its final acceptance a few corrections and changes must be carried out. I recommend a fine English and editorial review.

Introduction

Number of triatomine species is not updated. Please correct 150 + (References)

Line 70 – Correct “naturla” for “natural”

Results

Line 110 – Cross out “Triatomines”

Line 164 - Only TCI was found in positive samples. I would suggest cross out positive samples.

Discussion

Line 186 - Data of the certification

Line 287 – Change “ suggest “ by “ recommend “

I am not sure that the authors carried the characterization of “spatial concentration” of secondary vectors since just sparce field captures were performed. I would say the authors recorded the presence of secondary vectors in 24 municipalities of Boyaca. Please recheck and use the most precise term for defining study carried out.

Line 202- Spaces are missing.

Lines 256, 257- “ This species has the ability to develop peridomicile and domestic colonies in both the lowland areas and above 3,600 m.a.s.l. in Bolivia [22]. This sentence need several corrections: I would suggest changing it for: This species can be found in domiciliary and peridomiciliary ecotopes in the lowland areas and also above 3,600 m.a.s.l. in Bolivia [22].

It seems to me that the term “ability” is very anthropomorphic. Also in the original sentence the correct would be domiciliary and peridomiciliary colonies. The term domestic is not the best term at all. Please check the meaning of domestic. The colony could be inside the house but the domestication process could not be necessarily involved. Use whenever possible the term “domiciliary” instead of “domestic”.

Lines 284-286 - Here, however, we found populations of T. dimidiata and P. geniculatus infected with T. cruzi in municipalities located higher than the recommended altitude. We would suggest using “previous recorded altitude.”

Caveats- Are well presented and discussed. I just would include a relevant topic related to the frequency of the field captures to check for the species populations oscillations along the year and seasons.

M & M- I could not find an explicit information related to the criteria used for the insect identification. Please include a reference

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009574.r005

Decision Letter 2

Ricardo E Gürtler, Eric Dumonteil

17 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Cantillo-Barraza,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Distribution and Natural Infection Status of Synantrophic Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), Vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, Reveals New Epidemiological Scenarios for Chagas Disease in the Highlands of Colombia' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Ricardo E. Gürtler

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Eric Dumonteil

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009574.r006

Acceptance letter

Ricardo E Gürtler, Eric Dumonteil

13 Jul 2021

Dear Dr Cantillo-Barraza,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Distribution and Natural Infection Status of Synantrophic Triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), Vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, Reveals New Epidemiological Scenarios for Chagas Disease in the Highlands of Colombia," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Geographical distribution triatomine and infection by species Boyaca department of Colombia.

    T. dimidiata (A), T. venosa (B), P. geniculatus (C), P. rufotuberculatus (D) and R. prolixus (E) from March 2017 to November 2018. The map was built using the free and open source QGIS software version 3.4 (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html) and shapefiles were obtained from the free and open source DIVA-GIS site (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata).

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Geographical distribution of TcI DTU genotypes, in municipalities in Boyaca department (Colombia) between 2017 and 2018.

    (A) TcIDom and TcI sylvatic. (B) TcIDom and TcI sylvatic by triatomines species. The map was built using the free and open source QGIS software version 3.4 (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html) and shapefiles were obtained from the free and open source DIVA-GIS site (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata).

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewers_answerPLOSTND.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewers_answerPLOSTND.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES