Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2021 Aug 16;10:153. Originally published 2021 Feb 26. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.50938.2

Regional disparities in postnatal care among mothers aged 15-49 years old: An analysis of the Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey 2017

Mochammad Nur Cahyono 1, Ferry Efendi 1,a, Harmayetty Harmayetty 1, Qorinah Estiningtyas Sakilah Adnani 2,3, Hsiao Ying Hung 4
PMCID: PMC8323067  PMID: 34381591

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

1. As suggested by the reviewer, we have changed the title into "Regional disparities in postnatal care among mothers aged 15-49 years old: An analysis of the Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey 2017" 2. On the abstract part, result section, we have changed the term middle to central and the term East of Indonesia into Eastern, the term husband to spouse.  3. On the abstract part, conclusion section, we have revised the conclusion as suggested by reviewer.  4. The term of "Jawa" mentioned in the article, has been changed into Java. 5. The references in the article must be written in chronologically way in the same pattern for all. The reference list has been completed and corrected. 6. Table 3: Socio-demographic characteristic of participants PNC in Indonesia based on region (n=13,901). The total sum of (No) use of PNC is not right (4039) it is 4040 7. The discussion has been revised according to the reviewer suggested. The sentence has been revised accordingly.  8. The conclusion part has been revised accordingly as well as with data availability statement.

Abstract

Background: In Indonesia, maternal mortality remains high, significantly 61.59% occur in the postnatal period. Postnatal care (PNC) provision is a critical intervention between six hours and 42 days after childbirth and is the primary strategy to reduce maternal mortality rates. However, underutilisation of PNC in Indonesia still remains high, and limited studies have shown the regional disparities of PNC in Indonesia.

Methods: This study aims to explore the gaps between regions in PNC service for mothers who have had live births during the last five years in Indonesia. This study was a secondary data analysis study using the Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) in 2017. A total of 13,901 mothers aged 15-49 years having had live births within five years were included. Chi-squared test and binary logistic regression were performed to determine regional disparities in PNC.

Results: Results indicated that the prevalence of PNC service utilisation among mothers aged 15-49 years was 70.94%. However, regional gaps in the utilisation of PNC service were indicated. Mothers in the Central of Indonesia have used PNC services 2.54 times compared to mothers in the Eastern of Indonesia (OR = 2.54; 95% CI = 1.77-3.65, p<0.001). Apart from the region, other variables have a positive relationship with PNC service, including wealth quintile, accessibility health facilities, age of children, childbirth order, mother's education, maternal occupation, spouse's age, and spouse's education.

Conclusion: The results suggest the need for national policy focuses on service equality, accessible, and reliable implementation to improve postnatal care utilisation among mothers to achieve the maximum results for the Indonesian Universal Health Coverage plan.

Keywords: postnatal care, regional disparities, reduced inequalities

Introduction

Maternal morbidity and mortality are serious global health challenges. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) revealed that 94% of maternal mortality occurred in low and middle-income countries, of which Indonesia is one ( World Health Organization, 2019; World Health Organization et al., 2015). During 2000 and 2017, the maternal mortality ratio plunged by about 38% worldwide. Even with this decline, Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86% of maternal deaths worldwide. Southern Asia alone accounted for nearly one-fifth (58,000), which demonstrated the struggle to improve maternal health ( World Health Organization, 2019; World Health Organization et al., 2015). In the Indonesia context, the government determined a target to reach an important goal of reducing maternal mortality rate to 102 per 100,000 live births in 2015 ( Bappenas, 2015; Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2018). Despite the significant efforts to expand maternal health programmes, recent evidence showed that Indonesia was off-track to reach the Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) target by 2015. In 2015, maternal mortality deaths in Indonesia were three times higher than the MDGs target ( Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2018; UNICEF & World Health Organization, 2015; World Health Organization et al., 2015). Hence, reducing maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 by 2030 as one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targets could be a critical challenge for Indonesia ( UNICEF & World Health Organization, 2015; United Nations, 2017; World Health Organization, 2012).

Most maternal mortality deaths are preventable or treatable if skilled healthcare, such as midwives, is provided during the postnatal period. Critical interventions during the postnatal period must be delivered to prevent maternal mortality deaths ( Lawn et al., 2016; World Health Organization et al., 2015). In the Indonesian setting, the cause of maternal mortality is predominantly due to postpartum haemorrhage, followed by indirect causes, such as heart disease, severe anaemia, malaria, HIV/ AIDS and hepatitis. Many factors have been linked to interventions of postpartum haemorrhage which cause emergency cases, and skilled health care required to respond effectively to emergencies ( Adisasmita et al., 2015; Mahmood et al., 2018). However, PNC remains a critical intervention to reduce maternal deaths in Indonesia. A new health programme called EMAS or Expanding Maternal and Neonatal Survival) was implemented by the Indonesian government in 2012, focused on improving maternal health care. The programme aimed at ensuring that every woman has access to quality maternal healthcare, including childbirth assistance by skilled health personnel in healthcare facilities (a target of 2018 strategic plan: 82%), four visits of Antenatal care (ANC) (78% ), PNC, and providing ANC (87%). However, the national data revealed that utilisation of PNC among 34 provinces in Indonesia remain varied and was considered lower compared to the childbirth assistance by skilled health personnel coverage. Socioeconomic, geographical, and demographic factors influence the underutilisation of PNC. Current systematic reviews show that levels of education, poverty, and limitations of access to PNC services are common issues in low-and middle-income countries linked to inequities in the use of PNC services ( Langlois et al., 2015).

The national data of Indonesia in 2018 revealed that the average percentage of PNC visits for the first time in Indonesia was 93.3%. The highest percentage of visits occurred in Yogyakarta (99.6%), and the lowest percentage of visits was in Papua (56.3%). However, there were regional gaps in PNC visits across the provinces in Indonesia. Also, PNC utilisation in rural areas was lower than in urban areas of Indonesia ( Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2018; Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2018; Probandari et al., 2017). It is worth noting that 61.59 % of maternal mortality rates occurred during the postnatal period in Indonesia. Additionally, evidence shows that the quality of PNC is lower in most districts and cities among the Eastern Region in Indonesia. PNC must be performed a minimum of three times: within the first six hours to the third day after the delivery, from the fourth day to the 28th after the delivery and the 29th day to the 42nd day after childbirth. The standards of PNC including examination for vital signs; the apex of the uterus; lochia and other per vagina fluids; breasts and counselling for exclusive breastfeeding; provision of communication, information about and education of PNC, and family planning ( Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2018; Probandari et al., 2017).

Several studies show that regional disparities in PNC occur in several countries. In Ethiopia, there were differences in each region and variations at regional levels at the utilisation of PNC among women ( Sisay et al., 2019). PNC service in Zambia was also reported to experience regional disparities ( Jacobs et al., 2017). In the same vein, in Bangladesh, disparities in the utilisation of maternal health services were also reported ( Raheem et al., 2019). However, research focused on regional disparities on PNC among mothers aged 15–49 years old in Indonesia are not well investigated. This study was conducted to analyse the gap between regions in PNC service utilisation among mothers aged 15 – 49 years old who have had live births during the last five years in Indonesia. This study is significant because it can be a source of information and a reference regarding regional disparities in the utilisation of PNC services in Indonesia. This research could complete a bigger picture for consideration in resolving discrepancies in maternal services in Indonesia.

Methods

This study was a secondary data analysis using the most recent data from the 2017 Indonesian Demographic Data Survey (IDHS). In this study, unit analysis data consist of women aged 15–49 years old having had live births in the last five years preceding the survey.

The purpose of the cross-sectional study of the IDHS conducted by the Inner City Fund (ICF) international together with the national implementer in Indonesia was to offer up-to-date projections of fundamental demographic and health indicators. The IDHS study demonstrates a broad overview of population problems in Indonesia.

We utilised the data conducted by the national and provincial representatives. This cross-sectional study represents 1,970 census blocks in urban and rural areas of Indonesia. The census block obtained 59,100 female respondents aged 15–49 years old. The survey employed a two-stage stratified cluster sampling method. The first stage was the selection of several census blocks by systematic sampling proportional size. In the second stage, 25 ordinary households were selected with systematic sampling from the listing. In this study, a sample of 13,901 women aged 15–49 years from 34 provinces in Indonesia was analysed. The inclusion criteria were taken from IDHS that included all women aged 15–49 years who had given birth in the last five years. The exclusion criteria were whether the variables incomplete or missing. In order to allow replicate the DHS data, the guide for using datasets for DHS analysis is available at https://dhsprogram.com/data/Using-DataSets-for-Analysis.cfm.

Ethical consideration

Ethical review boards approved ethical clearance for the Inner City Fund OCR Macro (number 45 CFR 46) and the national board review from the Ministry of Health of Republic Indonesia. Before the survey, an informed consent was obtained from the respondents based on voluntary participation.

Variables

The dependent variable of this study was PNC visits. According to the recommendation of the Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, PNC must be performed at minimum three times: at the first six hours to the third day after the delivery, on the fourth day to the 28th after the delivery and the 29th day to the 42nd day after childbirth ( Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2018). This data was based on the mother’s perception of PNC utilisation during the postnatal period. Independent variables analysed in this study were the related geographic and socioeconomic factors, including a region of residence, the place of residence, wealth quintile, health insurance, access to a health facility, age, gender, birth rank, education, and occupation.

The residence region was grouped as six regions, namely Sumatera, Java, Bali & Nusa Tenggara, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Maluku & Papua, and of which were also categorised as Western Indonesia, Central Indonesia and Eastern Indonesia. The place of residence was determined as rural and urban areas. The wealth quintile of households was set into five categories: poorest, poorer, middle, richer, and richest. The wealth quintile of households was scored based on wealth criteria ( DHSProgram, 2016). Health insurance was divided into two categories, namely yes and no. Access to the health facility was categorised into two, namely difficult and not. Children’s age was divided into five categories: less than one month, one month, two months, three months, four months. The gender of the child, namely female and male. Birth rank was categorised as a first child, second, third, fourth and so on. Mother’s age was divided into six categories: 15–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–49, and 45–49, while spouse’s age was divided into seven categories: 11–20, 21–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, 61–70, 71–80. Mother’s and spouses' education levels were grouped into no education, primary, secondary, and higher education. Mother’s and spouse’s occupation was divided into two categories: not working and working. Determination of each category on the variables based on DHS report ( BKKBN-BPS-Kemenkes-ICF, 2018) which was adjusted to the minimum number of sample on each category to meet the statistical assumption.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using STATA version 16.0 by conducting descriptive analysis. The chi-square test was performed to determine variables correlated to the PNC utilisation. Binary logistic regression was utilised to determine disparity in this study. Measurement of associations among variables was expressed as Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Significant variables were tested with a p-value of 0.05 and 95% CI, which are considered the disparity in PNC among mothers aged 15–49 years in Indonesia.

Results

A total of 13,901 women aged 15–49 years old with live births in the last five years preceding the survey were interviewed. Table 1 shows the bivariate analysis that there were ten categories among some variables associated with the utilisation of PNC visits (p-value < 0.05). These variables include geographic factors, region, socio-economy (wealth quintile and access to the health facility), children (age of child and birth rank), mother factors (age, education and occupation), spouse factors (age, education, and occupation). Residence, socioeconomic (health insurance ownership), child gender, mother’s age and spouse’s occupation did not show associations with the utilisation of PNC visits among mothers aged 15–49 years old in Indonesia ( Table 1). More detail results can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristic of participants by utilization of PNC in Indonesia (n=13,901).

Characteristic Utilization of PNC X 2 p-value
No Yes
n % n %
The geographic factors
Indonesia
Western Indonesia 3265 29.1 7946 70.9 41.45 *** 0.00
Central Indonesia 611 26.5 1693 73.5
Eastern Indonesia 164 42.4 222 57.6
Region
Sumatera 1056 34.3 2027 65.7 116.36 *** 0.00
Java 2028 26.3 5691 73.7
Bali & Nusa Tenggara 232 26.5 642 73.5
Kalimantan 291 33.5 578 66.5
Sulawesi 270 27.8 701 72.2
Maluku & Papua 164 42.4 222 57.6
Place of residence
Rural 2051 28.6 5116 71.4 1.45 0.49
Urban 1989 29.5 4745 70.5
Socioeconomic factors
Wealth quintile
Poorest 928 34.6 1757 65.4 58.56 *** 0.00
Poorer 827 29.5 1980 70.5
Middle 781 26.9 2127 73.1
Richer 753 26.3 2109 73.7
Richest 751 28.4 1888 71.6
Health insurance
No 1713 29.8 4026 70.2 3.00 0.19
Yes 2326 28.5 5835 71.5
Access to the health
facility
Difficult 555 36.0 985 64.0 41.46 *** 0.00
Not 3485 28.2 8877 71.8
Child’s factors
Age of child (in month)
Less than one month 1007 33.0 2045 67.0 58.13 *** 0.00
One month 938 29.9 2198 70.1
Two months 840 30.0 1956 70.0
Three months 631 24.7 1929 75.3
Four months 623 26.4 1733 73.6
Sex of child
Male 2118 29.9 4963 70.1 5.11 0.06
Female 1922 28.2 4898 71.8
Birth rank
First child 1251 27.1 3368 72.9 41.25 *** 0.00
Second 1400 28.7 3469 71.3
Third 761 29.0 1864 71.0
Fourth and more 628 35.1 1160 64.9
Mother’s factors
Age of mother in year
15–24 796 30.6 1808 69.4 6.26 0.52
25–29 1032 29.2 2502 70.8
30–34 995 27.7 2594 72.3
35–39 808 29.0 1975 71.0
40–44 336 29.3 809 70.7
45–49 73 29.5 174 70.5
Mother’s level of education
No education 63 50.0 63 50.0 55.19 *** 0.00
Primary 1117 31.2 2458 68.8
Secondary 2357 28.9 5803 71.1
Higher 503 24.6 1537 75.4
Mother’s occupation
Working 1917 27.2 5136 72.8 24.97 *** 0.0001
Not working 2123 31.0 4725 69.0
Spouse’s factor
Age of spouse in year
11–20 44 45.8 52 54.2 23.83 ** 0.0068
21–30 1164 29.6 2772 70.4
31–40 1901 28.2 4843 71.8
41–50 817 29.2 1985 70.8
51–60 106 35.7 192 64.3
61–70 8 33.8 15 66.2
71–80 0 0.0 2 100.0
Spouse’s level of
education
No education 51 37.0 86 63.0 39.21 *** 0.0001
Primary 1254 32.5 2610 67.5
Secondary 2255 28.0 5803 72.0
Higher 479 26.0 1362 74.0
Spouse’s occupation
Working 4016 29.1 9799 70.9 0.15 0.72
Not working 23 27.2 63 72.8

*p<0.05; **p<0.01;***p<0.001

Table 2 shows that the least distribution of respondents is in the Eastern of Indonesia. Nearly half of participants who live in the Eastern of Indonesia did not use the PNC services. More than half of participants who live in the Eastern of Indonesia was classified as the lowest. Interestingly, most participants who live in the Eastern of Indonesia stated that there was no problem with access to the health facility. More detail characteristics of participants can be found in Table 2.

Table 2. Socio-demographic characteristic of study participants PNC in Indonesia based on region (n=13,901).

Indonesia
The use of PNC Western Indonesia Central
Indonesia
Eastern
Indonesia
Total
n % N % n % n %
No 3265 29.12 611 26.51 164 42.45 4040 29.06
Yes 7946 70.88 1693 73.49 222 57.55 9861 70.94
Wealth quintile
Poorest 1686 15.04 772 33.51 227 58.75 2685 19.32
Poorer 2224 19.84 516 22.40 67 17.30 2807 20.19
Middle 2465 21.99 403 17.48 40 10.42 2908 20.92
Richer 2516 22.44 314 13.63 32 8.28 2862 20.59
Richest 2320 20.69 299 12.98 20 5.25 2639 18.99
Health insurance
No 4731 42.20 870 37.77 138 35.77 5739 41.29
Yes 6480 57.80 1434 62.23 248 64.23 8162 58.71
Access to the health facility
Difficult 1176 10.49 294 12.75 70 18.03 1539 11.07
Not 10035 89.51 2010 87.25 317 81.97 12361 88.93
Age of child (in month)
Less than one month 2461 21.95 495 21.48 97 25.02 3052 21.96
One month 2533 22.59 509 22.11 93 24.21 3136 22.56
Two months 2230 19.89 485 21.07 82 21.17 2797 20.12
Three months 2084 18.59 411 17.84 64 16.64 2560 18.42
Four months 1903 16.98 403 17.50 50 12.96 2356 16.95
Sex of child
Male 5671 50.58 1208 52.42 203 52.56 7081 50.94
Female 5540 49.42 1096 47.58 183 47.44 6819 49.06
Birth rank
First child 3843 34.28 686 29.77 90 23.28 4619 33.23
Second 4015 35.81 752 32.65 101 26.27 4869 35.03
Third 2100 18.74 453 19.68 71 18.45 2625 18.88
Fourth and more 1252 11.17 412 17.89 124 32.00 1788 12.86
Age of mother in year
15–24 2080 18.55 445 19.33 79 20.46 2604 18.73
25–29 2853 25.44 579 25.14 102 26.28 3533 25.42
30–34 2916 26.01 577 25.05 95 24.69 3589 25.82
35–39 2277 20.31 435 18.87 72 18.54 2783 20.02
40–44 902 8.04 214 9.29 29 7.45 1145 8.23
45–49 183 1.63 53 2.32 10 2.57 247 1.77
Mother’s level of education
No education 63 0.56 43 1.87 21 5.35 127 0.91
Primary 2855 25.47 633 27.47 87 22.52 3575 25.72
Secondary 6739 60.11 1213 52.66 208 53.84 8160 58.70
Higher 1554 13.86 415 18.00 71 18.29 2039 14.67
Mother’s occupation
Working 5473 48.82 1352 58.68 228 59.12 7053 50.74
Not working 5738 51.18 952 41.32 158 40.88 6847 49.26
Age of spouse in year
11–20 70 0.63 20 0.85 6 1.48 96 0.69
21–30 3135 27.96 672 29.15 129 33.46 3936 28.31
31–40 5474 48.83 1093 47.43 177 45.91 6744 48.52
41–50 2295 20.47 445 19.31 62 16.06 2802 20.16
51–60 220 1.96 67 2.91 11 2.92 298 2.14
61–70 15 0.14 7 0.31 1 0.17 23 0.17
71–80 1 0.01 1 0.03 0 0.00 2 0.01
Spouse's level of education
No education 73 0.65 49 2.14 15 3.77 137 0.99
Primary 3066 27.35 716 31.10 81 20.98 3864 27.80
Secondary 6653 59.34 1175 51.01 230 59.65 8058 57.97
Higher 1418 12.65 363 15.75 60 15.60 1841 13.25
Spouse's occupation
Working 11154 99.49 2285 99.20 376 97.32 13815 99.38
Not working 57 0.51 18 0.80 10 2.68 86 0.62
Total 11211 100.00 2304 100.00 386 100.00 13901 100.00

Table 3 reveals that nearly half of participants who live in Sumatera, Kalimantan, Maluku and Papua did not use the PNC service. The highest number of participants classified as lowest was found in Maluku & Papua. For health insurance ownership, more participants who live in Kalimantan did not have health insurance. The highest number of participants having four and more children per household were found in Maluku & Papua ( Table 3).

Table 3. Sociodemographic characteristic of participants PNC in Indonesia based on region (n=13,901).

Region  
The use of PNC Sumatera Java Bali & Nusa
Tenggara
Kalimantan Sulawesi Maluku &
Papua
Total
n % n % n % n % n % n % n
No 1056 34.25 2028 26.27 232 26.52 291 33.46 270 27.79 164 42.45 4040
Yes 2027 65.75 5691 73.73 642 73.48 578 66.54 701 72.21 222 57.55 9861
Wealth quintile  
Poorest 711 23.05 838 10.85 357 40.83 211 24.34 342 35.21 227 58.75 2685
Poorer 725 23.52 1401 18.16 172 19.67 203 23.43 238 24.54 67 17.30 2807
Middle 657 21.32 1722 22.31 121 13.88 205 23.60 162 16.72 40 10.42 2908
Richer 546 17.72 1914 24.80 115 13.10 143 16.41 112 11.57 32 8.28 2862
Richest 444 14.39 1844 23.89 109 12.52 106 12.22 116 11.96 20 5.25 2639
Health insurance  
No 1259 40.83 3238 41.95 356 40.74 437 50.33 311 32.04 138 35.77 5739
Yes 1824 59.17 4481 58.05 518 59.26 431 49.67 659 67.96 248 64.23 8162
Access to the health
facility
 
Difficult 373 12.10 744 9.64 104 11.88 104 11.98 144 14.87 70 18.03 1539
Not 2710 87.90 6974 90.36 770 88.12 764 88.02 826 85.13 317 81.97 12361
Age of child (in month)  
Less than one month 731 23.70 1638 21.23 174 19.88 178 20.50 235 24.17 97 25.02 3052
One month 679 22.03 1770 22.93 193 22.05 175 20.18 225 23.22 93 24.21 3136
Two months 628 20.37 1515 19.62 184 21.01 201 23.15 188 19.34 82 21.17 2797
Three months 578 18.76 1438 18.63 165 18.91 152 17.54 162 16.65 64 16.64 2560
Four months 467 15.13 1358 17.59 159 18.15 162 18.63 161 16.62 50 12.96 2356
Sex of child  
Male 1589 51.55 3886 50.35 467 53.40 431 49.65 505 52.02 203 52.56 7081
Female 1494 48.45 3832 49.65 407 46.60 437 50.35 466 47.98 183 47.44 6819
Birth rank  
First child 882 28.60 2838 36.77 251 28.67 260 29.97 298 30.74 90 23.28 4619
Second 1025 33.24 2845 36.87 308 35.26 313 36.05 276 28.43 101 26.27 4869
Third 655 21.25 1357 17.58 160 18.26 178 20.44 205 21.11 71 18.45 2625
Fourth and more 521 16.91 678 8.79 156 17.81 118 13.54 191 19.72 124 32.00 1788
Age of mother in year  
15–24 512 16.60 1474 19.10 149 17.07 180 20.76 210 21.64 79 20.46 2604
25–29 783 25.41 1953 25.30 220 25.16 248 28.60 227 23.39 102 26.28 3533
30–34 886 28.73 1931 25.02 227 26.00 221 25.47 228 23.51 95 24.69 3589
35–39 604 19.59 1610 20.86 173 19.83 136 15.70 188 19.39 72 18.54 2783
40–44 249 8.09 625 8.09 84 9.57 62 7.12 96 9.91 29 7.45 1145
45–49 49 1.59 126 1.63 21 2.36 20 2.35 21 2.17 10 2.57 247
Mother's level of
education
 
No education 31 1.01 24 0.31 32 3.70 9 1.01 10 1.00 21 5.35 127
Primary 721 23.40 1988 25.76 250 28.58 269 30.98 260 26.75 87 22.52 3575
Secondary 1782 57.81 4739 61.40 445 50.94 479 55.17 506 52.14 208 53.84 8160
Higher 548 17.78 967 12.53 147 16.78 112 12.85 195 20.10 71 18.29 2039
Mother’s occupation  
Working 1684 54.63 3590 46.51 559 64.00 448 51.63 543 55.96 228 59.12 7053
Not working 1399 45.37 4129 53.49 315 36.00 420 48.37 427 44.04 158 40.88 6847
Age of spouse in year  
11–20 23 0.74 42 0.54 8 0.89 9 1.04 9 0.90 6 1.48 96
21–30 829 26.90 2169 28.10 244 27.87 258 29.67 307 31.61 129 33.46 3936
31–40 1557 50.50 3725 48.26 435 49.80 412 47.42 438 45.15 177 45.91 6744
41–50 606 19.66 1627 21.08 164 18.78 159 18.30 184 18.96 62 16.06 2802
51–60 63 2.04 146 1.89 22 2.53 30 3.42 26 2.72 11 2.92 298
61–70 4 0.12 11 0.14 1 0.13 1 0.15 6 0.57 1 0.17 23
71–80 1 0.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.08 0 0.00 2
Spouse's level of
education
 
No education 21 0.67 46 0.60 30 3.45 11 1.29 14 1.49 15 3.77 137
Primary 786 25.50 2140 27.72 266 30.38 267 30.74 324 33.43 81 20.98 3864
Secondary 1865 60.51 4564 59.14 430 49.20 490 56.43 478 49.23 230 59.65 8058
Higher 410 13.31 968 12.55 148 16.97 100 11.55 154 15.85 60 15.60 1841
Spouse’s occupation  
Working 3072 99.65 7673 99.41 865 98.93 865 99.55 964 99.33 376 97.32 13815
Not working 11 0.35 45 0.59 9 1.07 4 0.45 6 0.67 10 2.68 86
Total 3083 100.00 7718 100.00 874 100.00 869 100.00 970 100.00 386 100.00 13901

In multivariate analysis, the participants who live in the Central of Indonesia utilised PNC services 2.54 times more than the participants who live in the Western of Indonesia (OR = 2.54; 95% CI = 1.77-3.65). The participants who live in the Eastern of Indonesia had 0.71 fewer odds than participants in Indonesia’s Western (OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.52-0.96). The participants who live in Java were 1.46 times more likely to use PNC services (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.26-1.69) compared to participants living in Sulawesi (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.35-0.80). ( Table 4). Details of the results of multivariate analysis shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Binary logistic regression of PNC utilisation among mothers aged 15–49 years old in Indonesia based on geographical location.

Variable The use of PNC
P OR 95% CI
lower upper
Indonesia
Western Indonesia Ref. 1.0
Central Indonesia 0.00 *** 2.54 1.77 3.65
Eastern Indonesia 0.03 * 0.71 0.52 0.96
Region
Sumatera Ref. 1.0
Java 0.00 *** 1.46 1.26 1.69
Bali & Nusa Tenggara 0.007 ** 0.57 0.38 0.86
Kalimantan 0.007 ** 0.66 0.48 0.89
Sulawesi 0.002 ** 0.53 0.35 0.80
Maluku & Papua Omitted

* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001.

Table 5 reveals the middle category women based on wealth index had PNC service’s utilization increased by 1.25 greater odds (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.07-1.47) more than the richer category mothers (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.04-1.45). Participants who thought that access to the health facility was not a problem had an odds ratio of 1.29 greater than participants who considered access to the health facility to be a major problem in using PNC service (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.10-1.51). Mothers having children aged three months had used PNC service 1.43 times (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.23-1.66) more than mothers with children aged four months (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.12-1.51). Mothers who had a second child had utilized PNC service 0.88 times (OR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.78-0.99) more than mothers who had a third child (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.74-0.99). Mothers who had higher education had 2.11 times the chance to utilize PNC visits (OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.24-3.59) compared to those with lower-level education (OR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.09-2.98). Mothers with spouse’s aged 41–50 had a higher chance of utilization PNC visits (OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.31-3.63) compared to mothers with spouse’s aged 31–40 (OR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.26-3.40). Details of the results of a multivariate analysis shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Binary logistic regression of PNC utilisation among mothers aged 15–49 years old in Indonesia.

Variable The use of PNC
P OR 95% CI
lower upper
Wealth quintile
Poorest Ref. 1.0
Poorer 0.07 1.15 0.99 1.35
Middle 0.007 ** 1.25 1.07 1.47
Richer 0.017 * 1.23 1.04 1.45
Richest 0.86 1.02 0.85 1.22
Access to the health
facility
Difficult Ref. 1.0
Not 0.001 ** 1.29 1.10 1.51
Age of child (in month)
Less than one month Ref. 1.0
One month 0.06 1.13 0.99 1.28
Two months 0.11 1.11 0.98 1.26
Three months 0.00 *** 1.43 1.23 1.66
Four months 0.001 ** 1.30 1.12 1.51
Birth rank
First child Ref. 1.0
Second 0.04 * 0.88 0.78 0.99
Third 0.04 * 0.86 0.74 0.99
Fourth and more 0.00 *** 0.68 0.58 0.81
Mother’s level of
education
No education Ref. 1.0
Primary 0.02 * 1.80 1.09 2.98
Secondary 0.03 * 1.77 1.06 2.96
Higher 0.006 ** 2.11 1.24 3.59
Mother’s occupation
Working Ref. 1.0
Not working 0.007 ** 0.87 0.79 0.96
Age of spouse in year
11–20 Ref. 1.0
21–30 0.016 * 1.83 1.12 3.00
31–40 0.004 ** 2.07 1.26 3.40
41–50 0.003 ** 2.18 1.31 3.63
51–60 0.06 1.73 0.97 3.07
61–70 0.17 2.19 0.72 6.68
71–80 Omitted
Spouse’s level of
education
No education Ref. 1.0
Primary 0.98 1.01 0.67 1.51
Secondary 0.50 1.15 0.76 1.74
Higher 0.48 1.17 0.76 1.83

* p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001.

Discussion

This study aimed to examine the gap across the region in Indonesia for PNC utilisation among mothers aged 15–49 years old using the 2017 IDHS data sets. PNC has been the primary strategy to improve maternal health outcomes to reduce the high maternal mortality deaths in Indonesia. Therefore, assessing the regional disparities in PNC may provide evidence for the government to resolve discrepancies in maternal services in Indonesia. This study demonstrated that the prevalence of PNC service utilisation among mothers aged 15–49 years was 70.94%. This finding was higher than other research in Sub-Saharan Africa and Ethiopia with Abebo & Tesfaye (2018) and Tessema et al. (2020), respectively finding that 47.9% and 52.48% of women had used PNC service. An intertwined complex factor, such as the health system, maternal health policies, and socio-cultural variations across countries, may hinder women’s use of the PNC service.

Among the geographic groups analysed in this study, mothers who settled in the Central of Indonesia had increased odds of using PNC service, while those who lived in the Eastern of Indonesia had decreased odds. Similarly in Ethiopia ( Sisay et al., 2019), the geographic factor is correlated to the utilisation of PNC service due to the region's level of development and location. Evidence in Indonesia shows that the socio-economic development, such as industrial, housing, public transportation, road facilities and health facilities in the Eastern Indonesia, lagged compared to the Western of Indonesia ( Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2018; Soewondo et al., 2019; Suparmi et al., 2018). Therefore, it is a call of action to provide equality in developing human resources and infrastructure to reduce the possibility of gaps.

Additionally, mothers who live in Java are 1.46 times more likely to use PNC services than mothers who live in Sulawesi where they are 0.53 less likely to utilise PNC services. Java has dominance development compared to other islands because this island is the centre of the Indonesian government ( Laksono et al., 2020). The Java island oriented and centred development model has harmed maternal health outcomes in Indonesia ( Bappenas, 2018). Natural resources, human resources and facilities must be equal throughout Indonesia, so the gap between islands could be minimised.

This study revealed that the wealth index was significantly linked to PNC service utilisation among mothers aged 15–49 years old in Indonesia. Mothers from the middle households based on the wealth index had PNC service’s utilisation increased by 1.25 greater odds (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.07-1.47) more than the richer mothers (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.04-1.45). However, earlier research is done in Pakistan, Ethiopia, and Tanzania, revealed where mothers from the richer wealth quintile were significantly associated with the utilisation of PNC services ( Berhe et al., 2019; Mohan et al., 2017; Yunus et al., 2013). The odds ratio was quite similar between middle and richer households as shown on this study. Additionally, the previous study in other parts of Ethiopia demonstrated that sociodemographic factors, such as income, did not correlate with the use of PNC services ( Angore et al., 2018). Mothers from richer households were more likely to access the PNC services. Ownerships of consumer goods at home, such as motorcycles and cars, may increase the risk at ease transportation, making them have no strain to access the health facility.

The present study showed that access to the health facility was correlated to PNC service in Indonesia. With mothers who thought that access to the health facility was not a problem, they had an odds ratio of 1.29 greater in using PNC service than mothers who considered access to the health facility difficult. Previous research conducted in Malawi has found a significant association between the health facility and the utilisation of PNC services. Other Ethiopia studies have demonstrated that physical accessibility plays an essential variable in health service utilisation ( Kim et al., 2019; Tarekegn et al., 2014). Access to the health facility is related to the costs incurred, which is influenced by having transportation to the health facility, which is considered expensive. Long and shorter distances, better roads, and better public transportation may increase access to the health facility, primarily in Indonesia, with its massive gaps in development across the country ( Bappenas, 2018).

In this study, mothers having children aged three months increased the likelihood to use PNC services about 1.43 times (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.23-1.66) more than mothers with children aged four months (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.12-1.51). A similar study in Nepal showed that PNC service utilisation in the early postnatal period was most likely due to the motherhood transition period ( Sanjel et al., 2019). The possible reason could be that mothers with fewer children, and younger children, may want information and be petrified of complications during the postnatal period. In the Indonesia setting, the first neonatal examination (KN1) is carried out at 6–48 hours after the baby is born, which is at the same time for the first PNC visit (KF1). The second neonatal examination (KN2) is carried out between 3–7 days with the second PNC visit (KF2). The third neonatal examination (KN3) occurs alongside the third PNC visit (KF3), which is between 8–28 days after birth ( Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, 2018).

Also, mothers who have second child had a 0.88 times likelihood to utilize PNC service (OR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.78-0.99) than mothers having a third child (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.74-0.99). Some studies in Ethiopia and India showed that the higher the child's birth order, the lower the utilisation of PNC services ( Ali & Chauhan, 2020; Sisay et al., 2019). A possible reason could be that mothers who had more children were more likely experienced in motherhood and had appropriate knowledge from previous maternal experiences and childcare, hence restraining PNC service.

This study revealed that mothers who hold higher education qualifications have 2.11 times the chance of utilising PNC visits (OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.24-3.59) compared to those with lower-level education (OR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.09-2.98). Earlier research in Ethiopia showed that a mother's education was significant to PNC utilisation ( Tarekegn et al., 2014). The possible reason could be that educated women have a greater opportunity to be informed and are more aware of seeking advice and treatment from skilled healthcare personnel than uneducated women.

This study demonstrated that the spouse's age was significantly linked to the utilisation of PNC among mothers aged 15–49 years in Indonesia. Mothers who have spouses aged 41–50 have a higher chance of utilising PNC visits than mothers who have spouses aged 31–40. Similarly, in India showed that the spouse's age was associated with PNC's wives' service ( Jungari & Paswan, 2019). Spouse's autonomy and power in decision-making regarding wive's needs, including their health care needs, remained persistent. The spouse's age may be linked to the level of maturity and primary controller, which exacerbates their wives' access to the health service ( Jungari & Paswan, 2019; Sekine & Carter, 2019).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the gaps across the region in utilisation PNC service among mothers aged 15–49 years old in Indonesia, which is one of a country in Southeast Asia that contribute to the global burden of maternal mortality rates in the world. The strengths of our study that we utilised the national and provincial data representatives, which internationally standardised. However, we also note some limitations. The IDHS data analysed in this study was collected using the cross-sectional method and mother’s recall preceding survey prone to the possibility of bias information.

Conclusion

This study reveals the gap across the region for PNC utilisation among mothers aged 15–49 years old in Indonesia. This study's findings provide evidence to complete the bigger picture for the government to resolve discrepancies in maternal services in Indonesia. The results suggest the need for national policy focuses on service equality, accessible, and reliable implementation to improve postnatal care utilisation among mothers to achieve the maximum results for the Indonesian Universal Health Coverage plan. Future research should explore the interregional gaps and factors that cause maternal health service utilisation by using a different platform.

Data availability

Data used in this study is available online from the Indonesian 2017 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) website under the DHS VII recode column. Access to the dataset requires registration and is granted only for legitimate research purposes. A guide for how to apply for dataset access is available at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Access-Instructions.cfm. Other researchers will be able to access the data set in the same way as the authors and the authors do not have special access rights that others do not have.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

References

  1. Abebo TA, Tesfaye DJ: Postnatal care utilization and associated factors among women of reproductive age Group in Halaba Kulito Town, Southern Ethiopia. Arch Public Health. 2018;76:9. 10.1186/s13690-018-0256-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adisasmita A, Smith CV, El-Mohandes AAE, et al. : Maternal characteristics and clinical diagnoses influence obstetrical outcomes in Indonesia. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(7):1624–1633. 10.1007/s10995-015-1673-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali B, Chauhan S: Inequalities in the utilisation of maternal health care in rural India: Evidences from national family health survey III & IV. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):369. 10.1186/s12889-020-08480-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Angore BN, Tufa EG, Bisetegen FS: Determinants of postnatal care utilization in urban community among women in Debre Birhan Town, Northern Shewa, Ethiopia. J Health Popul Nutr. 2018;37(1):10. 10.1186/s41043-018-0140-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bappenas: Laporan pencapaian tujuan pembangunan milenium di Indonesia 2014.Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bappenas: Prakarsa pemerintah daerah dalam upaya pengurangan kesenjangan wilayah dan pembangunan daerah.Jakarta, Indonesia: Bappenas.2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  7. Berhe A, Bayray A, Berhe Y, et al. : Determinants of postnatal care utilization in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221161. 10.1371/journal.pone.0221161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BKKBN, BPS, Kemenkes, ICF: Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2017.Jakarta: BKKBN, BPS, Kemenkes, and ICF;2018. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  9. DHSProgram: Wealth Index.2016. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacobs C, Moshabela M, Maswenyeho S, et al. : Predictors of antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and postnatal care utilization among the remote and poorest rural communities of Zambia: a multilevel analysis. Front Public Health. 2017;5:11. 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jungari S, Paswan B: What he knows about her and how it affects her? Husband’s knowledge of pregnancy complications and maternal health care utilization among tribal population in Maharashtra, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):70. 10.1186/s12884-019-2214-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia: Laporan nasional riset kesehatan dasar: Jakarta.2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim ET, Singh K, Speizer IS, et al. : Availability of health facilities and utilization of maternal and newborn postnatal care in rural Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):503. 10.1186/s12884-019-2534-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Laksono AD, Rukmini R, Wulandari RD: Regional disparities in antenatal care utilization in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0224006. 10.1371/journal.pone.0224006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Langlois ÉV, Miszkurka M, Zunzunegui MV, et al. : Inequities in postnatal care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(4):259–270G. 10.2471/BLT.14.140996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, et al. : Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):587–603. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mahmood MA, Mufidah I, Scroggs S, et al. : Root-cause analysis of persistently high maternal mortality in a rural district of Indonesia: Role of clinical care quality and health services organizational factors. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:3673265. 10.1155/2018/3673265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia: Indonesia health profile Jakarta.Indonesia: Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia.2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mohan D, LeFevre AE, George A, et al. : Analysis of dropout across the continuum of maternal health care in Tanzania: findings from a cross-sectional household survey. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(6):791–799. 10.1093/heapol/czx005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Probandari A, Arcita A, Kothijah K, et al. : Barriers to utilization of postnatal care at village level in Klaten district, central Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):541. 10.1186/s12913-017-2490-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Raheem E, Khan JR, Hossain MS: Regional disparities in maternal and child health indicators: Cluster analysis of districts in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0210697. 10.1371/journal.pone.0210697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sanjel K, Onta SR, Amatya A, et al. : Patterns and determinants of essential neonatal care utilization among underprivileged ethnic groups in Midwest Nepal: a mixed method study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):310. 10.1186/s12884-019-2465-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sekine K, Carter DJ: The effect of child marriage on the utilization of maternal health care in Nepal: A cross-sectional analysis of Demographic and Health Survey 2016. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222643. 10.1371/journal.pone.0222643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sisay MM, Geremew TT, Demlie YW, et al. : Spatial patterns and determinants of postnatal care use in Ethiopia: findings from the 2016 demographic and health survey. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e025066. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Soewondo P, Johar M, Pujisubekti R, et al. : Inspecting primary healthcare centers in remote areas: Facilities, activities, and finances. Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia. 2019;7(1):89–98. 10.20473/jaki.v7i1.2019.89-98 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Suparmi, Kusumawardani N, Nambiar D, et al. : Subnational regional inequality in the public health development index in Indonesia. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(sup1):1500133. 10.1080/16549716.2018.1500133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tarekegn SM, Lieberman LS, Giedraitis V: Determinants of maternal health service utilization in Ethiopia: analysis of the 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):161. 10.1186/1471-2393-14-161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tessema ZT, Yazachew L, Tesema GA, et al. : Determinants of postnatal care utilization in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta and multilevel analysis of data from 36 sub-Saharan countries. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46(1):175. 10.1186/s13052-020-00944-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. UNICEF, World Health Organization: A decade of tracking progress for maternal, newborn and child survival the 2015 report.Geneva, Switzerland.2015. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  30. United Nations: Sustainable Development Goals 17 goals to transform our world.2017. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  31. World Health Organization: Coutdown to 2015 Maternal, Newborn & Child Survival.2012. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  32. World Health Organization: Maternal mortality.2019. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  33. World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA, et al. : Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015 Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division.2015. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  34. Yunus A, Iqbal S, Munawar R, et al. : Determinants of postnatal care services utilization in Pakistan-insights from Pakistan demographic and health survey (PDHS) 2006-07. Middle East J Sci Res. 2013;18(10):1440–1447. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2021 Jul 29. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.54033.r89395

Reviewer response for version 1

Kusrini S Kadar 1,2

This is a very interesting study providing information of the utilization of PNC services in Indonesia. The authors have described the gaps across the region clearly. We can see which regions in Indonesia utilized more PNC service as well as other factors contributing to this utilization. 

As this study using secondary data from Indonesian DHS in 2017, this situation might have changed now, perhaps it is good to add in the title the year of the survey. 

In the method section, it is not very clear whether the authors explain the method used by the IDHS or the method for this study. The information provided in this section hinders the possibility of others to replicate this study. Need more detailed information, step-by-step of what the authors did in this method section 1.

In the variable, for example, the authors categorized the mothers' age into six groups however there is no reference of this categorizing whether using WHO definition or else. Need to provide more information regarding this section.

Statistical analysis is already clear and can be replicated. The description of the result also has been clear.

In the discussion part, the authors' explanation is very repetitive. Every paragraph has a similar pattern where it started from the finding, comparing with previous study and additional explanation. Although this pattern can be accepted, however somehow make this part very boring. The authors tend to start the statement with: this study inline with.... the result congruent with...consistent with previous study... If it's possible to change the pattern in every paragraph not only the word that is used.

Lastly, there are some words that can be changed such as husband with spouse.

 

Term for explaining regions in Indonesia can be changed (follow the time zone of Indonesia): 

  1. "West of Indonesia" with Western part/regions of Indonesia/Western Indonesia.

  2. "Middle of Indonesia" with Central part/regions of Indonesia/Central Indonesia.

  3. "East of Indonesia" with Eastern part/regions of Indonesia/Eastern Indonesia.

For language clarity, I encourage the authors to use an English language editing service to produce more clear sentences and paragraphs.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Community health; health education; health promotion; nursing workforce

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

References

  • 1.: Predicting Obesity in Adults Using Machine Learning Techniques: An Analysis of Indonesian Basic Health Research 2018. Front Nutr.2021;8: 10.3389/fnut.2021.669155669155. 10.3389/fnut.2021.669155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2021 Aug 8.
Ferry Efendi 1

1. We appreciate the reviewer’s positive feedback and recommendations. We have added in the title the year of the survey as suggested. It would now read “Regional disparities in postnatal care among mothers aged 15-49 years old: An analysis of the Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey 2017”.

2. Thank you for your feedback. The sentence have been revised as follow: This study was a secondary data analysis using the most recent data from the 2017 Indonesian Demographic Data Survey (IDHS) collected by the Inner City Fund (ICF). This study is part of the International Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) program. We clarify that in the data availability section the information required for other researchers to replicate this study. Data used in this study is available online from the Indonesian 2017 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) website under the DHS VII recode column. Access to the dataset requires registration and is granted only for legitimate research purposes. A guide for how to apply for dataset access is available at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Access-Instructions.cfm. While the guide for using datasets for analysis is available at https://dhsprogram.com/data/Using-DataSets-for-Analysis.cfm. Other researchers will be able to access the data set in the same way as the authors and the authors do not have special access rights that others do not have. Further, we clarify that unlike other secondary data, DHS secondary data is structured and well organized to produce high-quality data. We have added more information on methods section for the purpose of replicability. 

Authors categorized the mothers' age into six groups based on the reference from DHS report, we have added the information on the methods section.

3. We appreciate the reviewer’s positive feedback and recommendations. The discussion has been revised according to the reviewer suggestion. The sentence have been revised as follows:

for example:

  • Among the geographic groups analyzed in this study, mothers who settled in the Middle of Indonesia had increased odds of using PNC service, while those who lived in the East of Indonesia had decreased odds. Similarly, in Ethiopia.

Other paragraphs:

  • However, earlier research is done in Pakistan, Ethiopia, and Tanzania, revealed where mothers from the richer wealth quintile were significantly associated with the utilization of PNC services…

  • Other Ethiopia studies have demonstrated that physical accessibility plays an essential variable in health service utilization…

  • In this study, mothers having children aged three months increased the likelihood to use PNC services about 1.43 times (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.23-1.66) more than mothers with children aged four months (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.12-1.51). A similar study in Nepal showed that PNC service utilization in the early postnatal period was most likely due to the motherhood transition period.

4. We appreciate the reviewer drawing our attention to check words, which has been corrected in our resubmission with “spouse” and term for explaining regions in Indonesia as suggested (Western Indonesia, Central Indonesia and Eastern Indonesia).

5. The professional English language editing service has been utilized to clarify sentences.

F1000Res. 2021 Mar 16. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.54033.r80365

Reviewer response for version 1

Asmaa Salah Eldin Mohamed Saleh 1

Hello, best greeting - It is my pleasure to review this article, thanks to the editors and authors.

I found this article was written in good condition by following the scientific rules for writing and I found nothing to be critic on it except just a few notes that do not affect the article structure; like authors mention Java and Jawa in entire the article, I suggest unifying the term mentioned in the article.

In the conclusion section, the authors mentioned that “Structured policies are needed to reduce gaps in areas with low service utilization. Developing innovative strategies to address PNC inequality in maternal services to improve maternal health is expected”. It would be preferred to have clearly applicable recommendations which serve as the solution for the article hypothesis.

The references in the article must be written in chronologically way in the same pattern for all.

Table 3: Socio-demographic characteristic of participants PNC in Indonesia based on region (n=13,901). The total sum of (No) use of PNC is not right (4039) it is 4040, you need to review it.

Many thanks, with my best wishes.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Community health nursing, maternal and children health nursing, geriatric health nursing, health promotion, health education, occupational health nursing, public health nursing, primary health nursing, rehabilitation nursing.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2021 Aug 8.
Ferry Efendi 1

  1. We thank the reviewer for the thoughtful review of our manuscript. The term mentioned in the article, which is Java, has been complete and corrected.

  2. Thank you for your suggestions. We have revised as follows: The results suggest the need for national policy focuses on service equality, accessible and reliable implementation to improve postnatal care utilization among mothers to achieve the maximum results for the Indonesian Universal Health Coverage plan.

  3. The reference list has been completed and corrected.

  4. We appreciate the reviewer drawing our attention to this error, which has been corrected in our resubmission (4040).

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Data used in this study is available online from the Indonesian 2017 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) website under the DHS VII recode column. Access to the dataset requires registration and is granted only for legitimate research purposes. A guide for how to apply for dataset access is available at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Access-Instructions.cfm. Other researchers will be able to access the data set in the same way as the authors and the authors do not have special access rights that others do not have.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES