
Keywords: animal model, cell generation, chemotaxis, clamp injury, inflammation, injury, neurotrophic factor, peripheral nerve protein array, repair, sciatic nerve, Wallerian degeneration
Abstract
Peripheral nerves have a limited capacity for self-repair and those that are severely damaged or have significant defects are challenging to repair. Investigating the pathophysiology of peripheral nerve repair is important for the clinical treatment of peripheral nerve repair and regeneration. In this study, rat models of right sciatic nerve injury were established by a clamping method. Protein chip assay was performed to quantify the levels of neurotrophic, inflammation-related, chemotaxis-related and cell generation-related factors in the sciatic nerve within 7 days after injury. The results revealed that the expression levels of neurotrophic factors (ciliary neurotrophic factor) and inflammation-related factors (intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1, interferon γ, interleukin-1α, interleukin-2, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, prolactin R, receptor of advanced glycation end products and tumor necrosis factor-α), chemotaxis-related factors (cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1, L-selectin and platelet-derived growth factor-AA) and cell generation-related factors (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) followed different trajectories. These findings will help clarify the pathophysiology of sciatic nerve injury repair and develop clinical treatments of peripheral nerve injury. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital of China (approval No. 2015-50) on December 9, 2015.
Chinese Library Classification No. R446; R745; R363
Introduction
Peripheral nerve injury is a common traumatic disease (Korus et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018) that can cause sensory and motor dysfunction (Ceynowa et al., 2017; Duarte-Moreira et al., 2018). Patients who are not treated promptly may develop permanent disability (Novak et al., 2010; Chui et al., 2018), seriously affecting the quality of life of patients and their families (Evans et al., 1999). Peripheral nerves have a limited capacity for self-repair. Peripheral nerves that are severely damaged or have significant defects are challenging to repair and a concerning medical issue (Arzillo et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2018). Conservative or surgical methods are the main approaches currently used for treating peripheral nerve injury (Zhang et al., 2013). However, the specific progression, pathogenesis and treatment limitations of peripheral nerve injury often lead to poor prognosis in such patients. Therefore, studies are urgently needed to evaluate the pathogenesis of this disease to inform improvements in its prevention and treatment.
Wallerian degeneration occurs at the distal end of a nerve fiber in the early stage after peripheral nerve injury (Xu et al., 2020). During this process, the distal myelin and axons are structurally altered within a few hours after injury and gradually decompose within 2–3 days. After 5–6 days, phagocytic cells increase in number, and remove the damaged myelin and axons from the lesion (Conforti et al., 2014). At 1 week after injury, repair commences with the proximal axon sprouting and gradually growing into a distal effector at a rate of 1–2 mm/d, eventually restoring function to the nerve (Blanquie and Bradke, 2018). Schwann cells form a new myelin sheath triggered by the distal secretion of nerve growth factors and neurotrophic factors to promote the repair and regeneration of injured nerves. Therefore, changes in related factors within 7 days after peripheral nerve injury can influence injury progression and repair (Capoccia et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2020). Increased knowledge of the changes would inform the mechanisms involved and aid prevention or reduction in peripheral nerve injury, suggesting avenues of treatment.
The studies range from the level of gene expression to the mechanisms of physiological processes. Many proteins are associated with the injury and repair processes. The traditional methods of detection require large amounts of tissues and cannot detect multiple protein factors simultaneously (Duerr, 2006). Protein chip technology has emerged as a method for tracking related proteins in tissue samples on a supporting medium with captured antibodies. A biotinylated antibody will readily bind to streptavidin. The proteins are quantitatively evaluated by measuring fluorescence. By immobilizing multiple captured antibodies on a supporting medium, a microarray can be prepared to examine multiple protein factors in parallel using a small amount of experimental tissue (Zhu and Snyder, 2003). This technology is useful in studies of molecular biological mechanisms.
Our study aimed to clarify the mechanism underlying the repair of peripheral nerve injury in the early stage. We used protein chip methods to test target protein factors related to Wallerian degeneration following the establishment of a rat model of lower limb sciatic nerve injury.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Thirty female Sprague-Dawley specific pathogen free rats, aged 6 weeks, weighing 140–180 g, were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (license No. SCXK (Jing) 2016-0006). The experimental animals were housed in the specific pathogen-free facility of the Experimental Animal Center of Peking University People’s Hospital, maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle at 24 ± 2°C and relative humidity of 50–55%. The experimental procedure and treatment of rats were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Public Health Service, 1996, NIH Publication No. 85-23). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital on December 9, 2015 with approval No. 2015-50.
Animal modeling
Thirty rats were randomly divided into normal (n = 3) and experimental groups (n = 27). Rats in the experimental group were anesthetized using a Matrx Animal Anesthesia Ventilator System (Midmark Corporation, Dayton, OH, USA). After the rats were placed in the left lateral position and shaved, the right sciatic nerve along the muscle space was exposed. The sciatic nerve was dissociated from the piriformis, and a rubber mat was padded around it. The sciatic nerve was clamped using a needle holder with a bottom width of 4 mm for 30 seconds (Bucan et al., 2019). The muscle was sutured by 4-0 double-needle stitching, followed by injection of 500 µL of normal saline into the muscle space with a 1-mL syringe. The skin was sutured using 4-0 sharp-needle stitching and disinfected with iodophor.
In the experimental group, three rats were randomly selected at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 hours, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after modeling, and 1-cm sciatic nerve tissues were collected from the right clamping site, from 3 mm above to 3 mm below the clamping site. In the normal group, a 1-cm sciatic nerve sample was collected from each rat from the equivalent site.
Protein chip assay
Using the GSR-CYT-3 protein chip (Raybiotech, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA), we evaluated four types of proteins: a neurotrophic-related protein (ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF)), inflammation-associated proteins (intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), interferon γ (IFNγ), interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), prolactin R, receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)), chemotaxis-associated proteins (cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 (CINC-1), L-selectin, platelet-derived growth factor-AA (PDGF-AA)), and the cell generation-associated protein (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)).
Rat nerve tissue was collected using the Raybiotech kit (Huaying Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein extracts were quantified by the Micro BCA Protein Assay (Huaying Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.). The chip sample wells were sequentially blocked, then the diluted sample was added and placed on a horizontal shaker (Hengao Technology Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) at 4°C, 70 r/min overnight. On the next day, the sample in each well was removed, washed, shaken, and centrifuged at 100 × g for 3 minutes. Cy3-streptavidin (Huaying Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.) was added to each well. The sample was incubated in the dark for 1 hour, and then rinsed and centrifuged. The chip was scanned with a GenePix 4000B chip scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) (Huang et al., 2018).
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All measurement data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to plot the expression curves of different protein factors at different time points. Proteins up-regulated or down-regulated by more than 15% were considered as differentially expressed, and those up-regulated by over 100% or down-regulated by over 50% were considered as significantly differentially expressed.
Results
Changes of neurotrophic-related proteins in injured sciatic nerve
The expression levels of CNTF protein in healthy nerve tissue and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after nerve injury are shown in Figure 1 and Additional Table 1. The expression of CNTF gradually increased in the early stage of nerve repair after sciatic nerve injury (Figure 2), and the expression of the chemotaxis related factor CINC-1 was significantly changed at 6 hours after nerve injury (Figure 3).
Figure 1.

Changes in the expression levels of neurotrophic-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve detected by protein chip assay.
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * Indicates up-regulation by over 15% compared with normal, ** Indicates up-regulation by over 100% compared with normal. CNTF: Ciliary neurotrophic factor.
Additional Table 1.
Changes in neurotrophic-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve
| Factor | Normal | Post-operation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 4 h | 6 h | 12h | 1 d | 3 d | 5 d | 7 d | ||
| CNTF | 671.67±218.73 | 598.33±57.00 | 708.33±25.32 | 777.67±160.66 | 1205.00±361.29 | 1394.67±115.25 | 892.33±73.87 | 1712.67±328.81 | 1769.00±343.87 | 2006.67±383.88 |
| ICAM-1 | 4129.67±754.03 | 3702.33±93.77 | 3528.67±780.93 | 3149.33±662.2963 | 4814.67±2648.58 | 4398.00±2394.55 | 5521.00±224.93 | 6429.00±95.17 | 7604.67±870.14 | 7964.33±1091.41 |
| IFNγ | 177.00±22.61 | 157.67±8.74 | 173.33±25.70 | 171.00±9.00 | 186.67±34.82 | 153.67±40.08 | 188.67±15.14 | 219.67±10.02 | 159.00±8.89 | 198.67±24.21 |
| IL-1α | 44.33±5.51 | 37.00±8.00 | 32.67±21.20 | 49.67±6.43 | 32.67±9.72 | 29.33±9.87 | 52.00±18.52 | 44.33±18.18 | 43.67±18.82 | 50.00±26.96 |
| IL-2 | 58.00±3.61 | 65.33±7.09 | 61.00±8.8882 | 55.67±10.69 | 59.67±12.74 | 51.67±7.57 | 73.00±13.23 | 71.67±15.63 | 40.33±4.62 | 50.33±10.69 |
| IL-4 | 156.0000±20.2978 | 154.33±13.28 | 179.00±25.71 | 197.67±16.05 | 233.67±59.34 | 190.33±22.37 | 215.67±16.65 | 287.00±29.87 | 216.67±28.04 | 278.33±68.66 |
| IL-6 | 15.00±3.61 | 6.67±3.51 | 14.67±1.15 | 11.33±2.08 | 28.33±17.62 | 21.67±15.53 | 6.67±5.13 | 16.67±6.43 | 11.00±8.00 | 23.00±27.73 |
| MCP-1 | 1114.00±376.40 | 1144.33±225.72 | 1396.67±325.68 | 8728.00±5357.65 | 36660.33±40501.34 | 36445.00±25825.71 | 29938.67±7176.70 | 24628.33±3489.97 | 23193.00±8125.88 | 15184.27±1635.55 |
| ProlactinR | 53.67±7.09 | 48.67±7.23 | 49.00±5.20 | 51.67±11.85 | 58.67±14.57 | 46.67±9.82 | 50.33±8.02 | 56.00±3.00 | 42.33±7.51 | 53.00±5.20 |
| RAGE | 4.33±3.5119 | 3.33±0.58 | 6.33±0.58 | 6.00±2.00 | 9.67±3.06 | 19.67±20.43 | 6.67±2.08 | 9.67±4.04 | 2.00±1.00 | 4.00±2.65 |
| TNF-α | 115.33±11.93 | 116.33±4.73 | 117.33±24.01 | 122.67±7.23 | 127.00±14.80 | 137.33±37.98 | 140.00±6.56 | 139.67±23.12 | 108.00±20.81 | 113.67±33.84 |
| CINC-1 | 68.33±1.53 | 75.00±21.38 | 98.00±16.64 | 122.67±29.50 | 200.67±144.92 | 105.00±27.73 | 90.00±5.57 | 112.33±12.42 | 58.00±9.17 | 75.67±23.86 |
| L-Selectin | 116.67±16.77 | 122.33±9.24 | 124.67±12.22 | 127.67±17.79 | 175.67±59.28 | 146.67±32.87 | 151.00±0.00 | 139.00±1.00 | 135.33±30.01 | 173.00±7.81 |
| PDGF-AA | 240.67±56.15 | 208.00±7.21 | 194.33±32.87 | 203.00±16.52 | 325.33±132.27 | 347.67±283.67 | 390.67±87.08 | 462.00±258.31 | 668.67±133.01 | 589.00±150.40 |
| GM-CSF | 150.00±10.82 | 145.00±8.00 | 156.00±17.35 | 159.33±13.01 | 180.67±61.01 | 154.67±39.37 | 198.00±4.36 | 232.33±28.36 | 171.33±7.51 | 198.33±38.53 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. CINC-1: Cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1; CNTF: ciliary neurotrophic factor; GM-CSF: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; ICAM-1: intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1; IFNγ: interferon γ; IL: interleukin; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; PDGF-AA: platelet-derived growth factor-AA; RAGE: receptor of advanced glycation end products; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α.
Figure 2.

Heat map of the levels of protein factors in injured sciatic nerve.
The average expression level of each protein factor is shown as a log value to depict a heat map. (A) Proteins with a changing trend. (B) Proteins with no changing trend. Greener colors indicate higher protein expression and redder colors indicate lower protein expression. CINC-1: Cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1; CNTF: ciliary neurotrophic factor; GM-CSF: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; ICAM-1: intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1; IFNγ: interferon γ; IL: interleukin; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; PDGF-AA: platelet-derived growth factor-AA; RAGE: receptor of advanced glycation end products; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α.
Figure 3.

Changes in protein expression levels at various time points after sciatic nerve injury.
(A–I) 1 (A), 2 (B), 4 (C), 6 (D), and 12 hours (E) and 1 (F), 3 (G), 5 (H), and 7 days (I) after nerve injury. Green indicates the number of protein factors up-regulated by over 100% or down-regulated by over 50% compared with normal group. Yellow indicates the number of protein factors up-regulated or down-regulated by over 15%. Red indicates the number of protein factors showing insignificant changes. Numbers indicate proteins that have changed accordingly.
Changes of inflammation-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve
The expression levels of ICAM-1, IFNγ, IL-1α, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-6 in healthy nerve tissue and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after nerve injury are shown in Figure 4 and Additional Table 1. The expression of ICAM-1 first decreased and then increased; the expression of MCP-1, RAGE, and TNF-α first increased and then decreased; and the expression of IFNγ, IL-1α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and prolactin R showed no significant changes (Figure 2). The expression of MCP-1 was significantly higher at 4 hours after nerve injury compared with healthy nerve tissue (Figure 3).
Figure 4.
Changes in the expression levels of inflammation-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve.
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * Indicates up-regulation by over 15% compared with normal, ** Indicates up-regulation by over 100% compared with normal, # Indicates down-regulation by over 15% compared with normal, ## Indicates down-regulation by over 50% compared with normal. ICAM-1: Intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1; IFNγ: interferon γ; IL: interleukin; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; RAGE: receptor of advanced glycation end products; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α.
Changes of cell chemotaxis-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve
The expression levels of CINC-1, L-selectin, and PDGF-AA in healthy nerve tissue and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after nerve injury are shown in Figure 5 and Additional Table 1. The expression of CINC-1 and L-selectin increased first and then decreased, showing significantly increased change at 6 hours after nerve injury, whereas the expression of PDGF-AA decreased initially then increased significantly at 5 days after nerve injury (Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 5.

Changes in the expression levels of cell chemotaxis-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve.
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * Indicates up-regulation by over 15% compared with normal, ** indicates up-regulation by over 100% compared with normal, # indicates down-regulation by over 15% compared with normal. CINC-1: Cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1; PDGF-AA: platelet-derived growth factor-AA.
Changes of cell generation-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve
The expression levels of GM-CSF in healthy nerve tissue and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after nerve injury are shown in Figure 6 and Additional Table 1. The expression trend of GM-CSF was wavy (Figure 2).
Figure 6.

Changes in the expression levels of cell generation-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve.
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * Indicates up-regulation by over 15% compared with normal. GM-CSF: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
Discussion
Peripheral nerve injury is a clinically common traumatic disease with a high incidence that is not easily treated without surgical intervention (Wang et al., 2017; Costales et al., 2019). By evaluating the specific mechanisms underlying the repair process of peripheral nerve injury, corresponding targets can be identified, and related treatments can be performed to promote peripheral nerve regeneration and repair. Few studies have examined the changes in peripheral nerve-related factors during the early stage of repair after peripheral nerve injury, consequently the mechanism is not well-understood. In this study, we prepared a Sprague-Dawley rat model of sciatic nerve clamp injury and used the GSR-CYT-3 high-throughput protein chip produced by Raybiotech to test related proteins at different time points in the early stage of nerve repair after peripheral nerve injury.
Neurotrophic factors (Boyd and Gordon, 2003), inflammatory factors (Micaroni et al., 2013), chemokines (Manjavachi et al., 2014) and cytogenetic factors (Be’eri et al., 1998) are involved in the repair of peripheral nerve injury. In this study, the factors loaded on the GSR-CYT-3 protein chip were classified into these four groups and members listed in the Methods section. The neurotrophic factor, CNTF, is essential in regulating nerve growth (Cen et al., 2017). There are many protein factors related to inflammation, including ICAM-1 (CD54), which is involved in promoting tissue adhesion at the inflammation site. By binding to its receptor, ICAM-1 promotes interactions between inflammatory cells and endothelial cells and the migration of endothelial cells and leukocytes. Myocardial infarction triggers a significant increase in the expression of ICAM-1 (Ibarra-Lara et al., 2019). IFNγ belongs to the interferon family. Both IFNγ and TNF-α induce nitric oxide synthase and enhance the expression of nitric oxide that promotes autophagy and apoptosis. These two factors have been used as therapeutic drugs for treating inflammatory diseases caused by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (Li et al., 2019). IL-1α, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-6 are members of the interleukin family, which is among the most widely studied inflammatory families involved in the inflammatory or immune processes associated with many diseases. The family members not only stimulate inflammatory injury but are also pivotal in the anti- or pro-inflammatory process (Corpuz et al., 2017; Malik and Kanneganti, 2018; Sharba et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). MCP-1 is an inflammatory factor in the chemokine CC subfamily. Angiotensin II can induce inflammatory responses through MCP-1 and then participate in inflammatory diseases. Prolactin is a neuroendocrine hormone that promotes inflammation and can also be produced in the synovium of patients with arthritis (Tang et al., 2017). Prolactin R is a prolactin receptor that is closely related to inflammation. Secreted RAGE has a pro-inflammatory role in various diseases (Guan et al., 2019). TNF-α is an inflammatory factor elevated in a variety of inflammatory diseases (Blaser et al., 2016). Cell chemotaxis promoting factors include CINC-1, which promotes neutrophil migration by regulating the process of cell surface adhesion, and its expression at the injury site may be a major factor affecting neutrophil infiltration (Bhatia et al., 2000). Neutrophils are important effectors in acute inflammation (Xu et al., 2019). L-Selectin is a cell adhesion molecule expressed by lymphocytes and is a homing receptor for lymphocytes to reach the peripheral lymph nodes (Rosen, 2004). Chronic inflammation promotes tumor growth by inducing the expression of L-selectin (Perfilyeva et al., 2019). PDGF-AA may be involved in the transfer of activated monocytes to inflammation and injury sites (Krettek et al., 2001). Cell generation factor GM-CSF promotes the differentiation of bone marrow precursor cells into macrophages and granulocytes. This factor functions in both the active and stationary phases of inflammatory diseases and has a significant pro-inflammatory effect (Shiomi and Usui, 2015).
In our study, the expression of CNTF, a neurotrophic factor, gradually increased in the early stage of nerve repair after sciatic nerve injury. Natural variation in several important factors involved in the early stage of nerve repair was observed after sciatic nerve injury in Sprague-Dawley rats. The inflammatory proteins MCP-1, RAGE, TNF-α, and ICAM-1 showed different expression trends in the early stage after sciatic nerve injury in rats. These proteins aggravate inflammatory reactions to varying extents after sciatic nerve injury. CINC-1, L-selectin, and PDGF-AA exacerbate inflammation by causing neutrophil aggregation in the injured nerve, with changes in protein expression also influencing the severity of inflammation. GM-CSF stimulates granulocyte differentiation and promotes inflammation through neutrophil aggregation. Ultimately, the expression of neurotrophic factors, such as CNTF, is increased in the early stage after nerve injury, triggering nerve repair.
In this study, significant changes in the expression of MCP-1, RAGE (protein factors directly related to inflammation), CINC-1, PDGF-AA (e.g., protein factors related to chemotaxis of granulocytes, and macrophages) and CNTF (neurotrophic related protein) were observed at 4, 6 and 12 hours and 5 days after nerve injury, respectively. However, this study lacked a discussion on the mechanism of changes in the proteins due to the complex regulation nets, only describing the dynamic changes in proteins in the early stages of nerve injury. The certain conclusions that can be drawn from our research were that inflammation and cell chemotaxis led to the secretion of neurotrophic factors and participated in the repair process in the first week of sciatic nerve repair.
The limitation of this study is that the multiple protein changes during Wallerian degeneration, which have been detected by protein chips, have not been verified through western blot or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. However, the study has identified changes in particular protein factors related to the repair of peripheral nerve injury in the early stage of nerve repair, which may contribute to further studies of the mechanism underlying the repair of this injury.
Our results will inform our future research, when we will focus on the roles of MCP-1, CINC-1, RAGE, CNTF, PDGF-AA, among other factors, in the early stage of inflammation and the chemotaxis of white blood cells and macrophages following peripheral nerve injury and repair. To further explore the pathways involved during the first week after peripheral nerve injury, high-throughput sequencing combined with different cell models and animal models could be used. This should enhance the detection and verify the changes of these factors to explore the changes in inflammation, immune cell chemotaxis and neurotrophic factors after peripheral nerve injury.
Additional file:
Additional Table 1: Changes in neurotrophic-related protein factors in injured sciatic nerve.
Footnotes
C-Editor: Zhao M; S-Editors: Yu J, Li CH; L-Editors: Yu J, Song LP; T-Editor: Jia Y
Funding: This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2016YFC1101604 (to YHK); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Clinical Medicine Plus X - Young Scholars Project of Peking University, No. PKU2020LCXQ020 (to YHK); the Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration (Peking University), Ministry of Education of China, No. BMU2019XY007-01 (to YHK); Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of China, Nos. 2019A1515110983 (to FY) and 2019A1515011290 (to FY); and Shenzhen “San-Ming” Project of Medicine of China, No. SZSM201612092 (to FY).
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Financial support: This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2016YFC1101604 (to YHK); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Clinical Medicine Plus X - Young Scholars Project of Peking University, No. PKU2020LCXQ020 (to YHK); the Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration (Peking University), Ministry of Education of China, No. BMU2019XY007-01 (to YHK); Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of China, Nos. 2019A1515110983 (to FY) and 2019A1515011290 (to FY); and Shenzhen “San-Ming” Project of Medicine of China, No. SZSM201612092 (to FY). The funding sources had no role in study conception and design, data analysis or interpretation, paper writing or deciding to submit this paper for publication.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital of China (approval No. 2015-50) on December 9, 2015.
Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.
Data sharing statement: Datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.
Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1.Arzillo S, Gishen K, Askari M. Brachial plexus injury: treatment options and outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1200–1206. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Be’eri H, Reichert F, Saada A, Rotshenker S. The cytokine network of wallerian degeneration: IL-10 and GM-CSF. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10:2707–2713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bhatia M, Brady M, Zagorski J, Christmas SE, Campbell F, Neoptolemos JP, Slavin J. Treatment with neutralising antibody against cytokine induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC) protects rats against acute pancreatitis associated lung injury. Gut. 2000;47:838–844. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.6.838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blanquie O, Bradke F. Cytoskeleton dynamics in axon regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;51:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Blaser H, Dostert C, Mak TW, Brenner D. TNF and ROS crosstalk in inflammation. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:249–261. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boyd JG, Gordon T. Neurotrophic factors and their receptors in axonal regeneration and functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2003;27:277–324. doi: 10.1385/MN:27:3:277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bucan V, Vaslaitis D, Peck CT, Strauß S, Vogt PM, Radtke C. Effect of exosomes from rat adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on neurite outgrowth and sciatic nerve regeneration after crush injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56:1812–1824. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1172-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Capoccia L, Montelione N, Menna D, Cassoni A, Valentini V, Iannetti G, Sbarigia E, Speziale F. Mandibular subluxation as an adjunct in very distal carotid arterial reconstruction: incidence of peripheral and cerebral neurologic sequelae in a single-center experience. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:358–365. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cen LP, Liang JJ, Chen JH, Harvey AR, Ng TK, Zhang M, Pang CP, Cui Q, Fan YM. AAV-mediated transfer of RhoA shRNA and CNTF promotes retinal ganglion cell survival and axon regeneration. Neuroscience. 2017;343:472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ceynowa M, Pankowski R, Rocławski M, Mazurek T. The sensory function of the uninjured nerve in patients after median and ulnar nerve injury. J Hand Ther. 2017;30:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chui J, Murkin JM, Posner KL, Domino KB. Perioperative peripheral nerve injury after general anesthesia: a qualitative systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2018;127:134–143. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Conforti L, Gilley J, Coleman MP. Wallerian degeneration: an emerging axon death pathway linking injury and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:394–409. doi: 10.1038/nrn3680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Corpuz TM, Vazquez-Lombardi R, Luong JK, Warren J, Stolp J, Christ D, King C, Brink R, Sprent J, Webster KE. IL-2 shapes the survival and plasticity of IL-17-producing γδ T cells. J Immunol. 2017;199:2366–2376. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Costales JR, Socolovsky M, Sánchez Lázaro JA, Álvarez García R. Peripheral nerve injuries in the pediatric population: a review of the literature. Part I: traumatic nerve injuries. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35:29–35. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-3974-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duarte-Moreira RJ, Castro KV, Luz-Santos C, Martins JVP, Sá KN, Baptista AF. Electromyographic biofeedback in motor function recovery after peripheral nerve injury: an integrative review of the literature. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018;43:247–257. doi: 10.1007/s10484-018-9403-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duerr JS. Immunohistochemistry. WormBook. 2006:1–61. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.105.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Evans GR, Brandt K, Widmer MS, Lu L, Meszlenyi RK, Gupta PK, Mikos AG, Hodges J, Williams J, Gürlek A, Nabawi A, Lohman R, Patrick CW., Jr In vivo evaluation of poly(L-lactic acid) porous conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1109–1115. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guan L, Geng X, Stone C, Cosky EEP, Ji Y, Du H, Zhang K, Sun Q, Ding Y. PM(2.5) exposure induces systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in an intracranial atherosclerosis rat model. Environ Toxicol. 2019;34:530–538. doi: 10.1002/tox.22707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huang W, Luo S, Burgess R, Yi YH, Huang GF, Huang RP. New insights into the tumor microenvironment utilizing protein array technology. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19 doi: 10.3390/ijms19020559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ibarra-Lara L, Sánchez-Aguilar M, Soria-Castro E, Vargas-Barrón J, Roldán FJ, Pavón N, Torres-Narváez JC, Cervantes-Pérez LG, Pastelín-Hernández G, Sánchez-Mendoza A. Clofibrate treatment decreases inflammation and reverses myocardial infarction-induced remodelation in a rodent experimental model. Molecules. 2019;24:270. doi: 10.3390/molecules24020270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Korus L, Ross DC, Doherty CD, Miller TA. Nerve transfers and neurotization in peripheral nerve injury, from surgery to rehabilitation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:188–197. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Krettek A, Ostergren-Lundén G, Fager G, Rosmond C, Bondjers G, Lustig F. Expression of PDGF receptors and ligand-induced migration of partially differentiated human monocyte-derived macrophages. Influence of IFN-gamma and TGF-beta. Atherosclerosis. 2001;156:267–275. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00644-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li X, Shang B, Li YN, Shi Y, Shao C. IFNγ and TNFα synergistically induce apoptosis of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells via the induction of nitric oxide. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:18. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1102-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lin YF, Xie Z, Zhou J, Yin G, Lin HD. Differential gene and protein expression between rat tibial nerve and common peroneal nerve during Wallerian degeneration. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14:2183–2191. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.262602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Malik A, Kanneganti TD. Function and regulation of IL-1α in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Immunol Rev. 2018;281:124–137. doi: 10.1111/imr.12615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Manjavachi MN, Costa R, Quintão NL, Calixto JB. The role of keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) on hyperalgesia caused by peripheral nerve injury in mice. Neuropharmacology. 2014;79:17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Micaroni M, Stanley AC, Khromykh T, Venturato J, Wong CX, Lim JP, Marsh BJ, Storrie B, Gleeson PA, Stow JL. Rab6a/a’ are important Golgi regulators of pro-inflammatory TNF secretion in macrophages. PLoS One 8. 2013:e57034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Mackinnon SE, Katz J. Relationships among pain disability, pain intensity, illness intrusiveness, and upper extremity disability in patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:1633–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Perfilyeva YV, Abdolla N, Ostapchuk YO, Tleulieva R, Krasnoshtanov VC, Perfilyeva AV, Belyaev NN. Chronic inflammation contributes to tumor growth: possible role of L-selectin-expressing myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) Inflammation. 2019;42:276–289. doi: 10.1007/s10753-018-0892-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rosen SD. Ligands for L-selectin: homing, inflammation, and beyond. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:129–156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.090501.080131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sharba S, Navabi N, Padra M, Persson JA, Quintana-Hayashi MP, Gustafsson JK, Szeponik L, Venkatakrishnan V, Sjöling Å, Nilsson S, Quiding-Järbrink M, Johansson MEV, Linden SK. Interleukin 4 induces rapid mucin transport, increases mucus thickness and quality and decreases colitis and Citrobacter rodentium in contact with epithelial cells. Virulence. 2019;10:97–117. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2019.1573050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shiomi A, Usui T. Pivotal roles of GM-CSF in autoimmunity and inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:568543. doi: 10.1155/2015/568543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sun X, Wang Y, Guo Z, Xiao B, Sun Z, Yin H, Meng H, Sui X, Zhao Q, Guo Q, Wang A, Xu W, Liu S, Li Y, Lu S, Peng J. Acellular cauda equina allograft as main material combined with biodegradable chitin conduit for regeneration of long-distance sciatic nerve defect in rats. Adv Healthc Mater 7. 2018:e1800276. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201800276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tang MW, Garcia S, Malvar Fernandez B, Gerlag DM, Tak PP, Reedquist KA. Rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis synovial fluids stimulate prolactin production by macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;102:897–904. doi: 10.1189/jlb.2A0317-115RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang E, Inaba K, Byerly S, Escamilla D, Cho J, Carey J, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A, Demetriades D. Optimal timing for repair of peripheral nerve injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83:875–881. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang WW, Lu YC, Tang WJ, Zhang JH, Sun HP, Feng XY, Liu HQ. Small-worldness of brain networks after brachial plexus injury: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13:1061–1065. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.233450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wei S, Liang XZ, Hu Q, Wang WS, Xu WJ, Cheng XQ, Peng J, Guo QY, Liu SY, Jiang W, Ding X, Han GH, Liu P, Shi CH, Wang Y. Different protein expression patterns in rat spinal nerves during Wallerian degeneration assessed using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation proteomics profiling. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15:315–323. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.265556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu WJ, Wang XX, Jin JJ, Zou Q, Wu L, Lv TF, Wan B, Zhan P, Zhu SH, Liu HB, Zhao NW, Li CJ, Song Y. Inhibition of GGPPS1 attenuated LPS-induced acute lung injury and was associated with NLRP3 inflammasome suppression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2019;316:L567–577. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00190.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xu ZQ, Lu HB, Ma WF, Yang XN, Qi ZL. 3-Methyladenine improves the efficiency of sciatic nerve allograft in mice. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu. 2020;24:1671–1676. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang P, Han N, Wang T, Xue F, Kou Y, Wang Y, Yin X, Lu L, Tian G, Gong X, Chen S, Dang Y, Peng J, Jiang B. Biodegradable conduit small gap tubulization for peripheral nerve mutilation: a substitute for traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10:171–175. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang Z, La Placa D, Nguyen T, Kujawski M, Le K, Li L, Shively JE. CEACAM1 regulates the IL-6 mediated fever response to LPS through the RP105 receptor in murine monocytes. BMC Immunol. 2019;20:7. doi: 10.1186/s12865-019-0287-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhu H, Snyder M. Protein chip technology. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2003;7:55–63. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

