Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Jul 20;15(7):e0009594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009594

Staging liver fibrosis after severe yellow fever with ultrasound elastography in Brazil: A six-month follow-up study

Yuri Costa Sarno Neves 1,*, Victor Augusto Camarinha de Castro-Lima 2, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla 3, Vivian Simone de Medeiros Ogata 1, Fernando Linhares Pereira 1, Jordana Machado Araujo 2, Ana Catharina Seixas Nastri 2, Yeh-Li Ho 2, Maria Cristina Chammas 1
Editor: Michael R Holbrook4
PMCID: PMC8323872  PMID: 34283826

Abstract

Background

Yellow fever (YF) is a hemorrhagic disease caused by an arbovirus endemic in South America, with recent outbreaks in the last years. Severe cases exhibit fulminant hepatitis, but there are no studies regarding its late-term effects on liver parenchyma. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the frequency and grade of liver fibrosis in patients who recovered from severe YF and to point out potential predictors of this outcome.

Methodology/Principal findings

We followed-up 18 patients who survived severe YF during a recent outbreak (January-April 2018) in Brazil using ultrasound (US) with shear-wave elastography (SWE) at 6 months after symptoms onset. No patient had previous history of liver disease.

Median liver stiffness (LS) was 5.3 (4.6–6.4) kPa. 2 (11.1%) patients were classified as Metavir F2, 1 (8.3%) as F3 and 1 (8.3%) as F4; these two last patients had features of cardiogenic liver congestion on Doppler analysis. Age and cardiac failure were associated with increased LS (p = 0.036 and p = 0.024, respectively). SAPS-3 at ICU admission showed a tendency of association with significant fibrosis (≥ F2; p = 0.053). 7 patients used sofosbuvir in a research protocol, of which none showed liver fibrosis (p = 0.119).

Conclusions/Significance

We found a low frequency of liver fibrosis in severe YF survivors. US with SWE may have a role in the follow up of patients of age and / or with comorbidities after hospital discharge in severe YF, a rare but reemergent disease.

Author summary

Yellow fever (YF) is a viral disease transmitted by mosquitoes and represents an important health problem in countries of South America and Africa, with recent outbreaks in the past few years. Severe cases lead to fulminant hepatitis and death; it has also been reported that surviving patients tend to recover / “regenerate” the liver after the acute phase of the disease. However, there are no prior investigations on this matter. Thus, we followed up a group of previously healthy patients who had severe YF 6 months after the initial symptoms, using a non-invasive ultrasound technique of estimating the liver fibrosis (scar tissue) grade, called elastography. In our findings, we report a low frequency of liver fibrosis. Thus, we concluded that patients who had severe YF are not likely to have late-term liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. Nevertheless, there are some specific individuals (older or with chronic diseases) that might need further evaluation.

Introduction

Yellow fever (YF) is a mosquito-borne hemorrhagic disease caused by an arbovirus of genus Flavivirus that occurs in tropical regions of South America and Africa [1]. In Brazil, urban transmission cycle was interrupted in 1940’s due to massive vaccination campaign and vector control programs [2]. However, the enzoosis remains present and human infection continues to occur in a sylvatic cycle [3]. In the beginning of 2018, a YF outbreak occurred on the outskirts of Sao Paulo; 538 cases were confirmed between January and December 2018, with a lethality rate of 34.6%[4]. The pathophysiology of the disease involves viral tropism and acute direct damage to vital organs such as liver and kidneys[57], in severe cases leading to fulminant hepatitis and acute renal failure (often requiring replacement therapies)[811], with high in-hospital case fatality rates (of up to 67%, according to recent studies[1214]).

It is not clear whether liver fibrosis arises after initial insult in severe form surviving patients. Some reports showed that patients recover completely from other acute hepatitis, with no signs or symptoms of chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis[15,16]. However, specific longitudinal data in YF patients after recovery is lacking. Due to the rarity of the disease and the absence of specific technologies in prior outbreaks, few patients were adequately followed up in order to clarify this matter. Additionally, a recent series demonstrated a late-onset relapsing hepatitis, a newly discovered entity, in patients who recovered from the acute phase of the disease[17].

In this context, non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with ultrasound (US) using new shear-wave elastography (SWE) techniques can be an important and accessible tool to investigate liver parenchyma status after acute hepatitis[18]. US-based elastography techniques are low-cost and radiation-free imaging methods[19], with performances comparable to those of biopsy[20]. It is also worth noting that liver biopsy with histological examination, although historically considered the reference standard for staging fibrosis, has considerable interobserver variability[21] and the disadvantage of being an invasive procedure, with intrinsic risks, and thus not suitable for longitudinal monitoring. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine whether patients who recovered from severe yellow fever developed liver fibrosis based on SWE evaluation and to point out potential predictors (clinical and laboratory) of cirrhosis during the follow up time.

Methods

Ethics statement

All enrolled patients signed an Informed Consent Form. Research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade da Universidade de São Paulo–HCFMUSP—CAPPesq (no 2.833.376). We followed the STROBE Statement checklist for observational studies [22].

Study design

This is a cohort study of patients who were admitted to an infectious diseases intensive care unit (ICU) of a teaching tertiary-care hospital in São Paulo (Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo) with the diagnosis of severe YF, confirmed by serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Criteria for severe YF and to be admitted to the ICU were pre-specified in a prior study[23]. Individuals discharged between January and April 2018 were contacted by phone, invited to participate in the study and to attend to the Hospital’s Ultrasonography Department to perform a non-enhanced abdominal US with SWE. Scans were carried at 6 months after symptoms onset. There were no exclusion criteria.

SWE evaluations were performed by a board-certified radiologist (5 years of training in US) on an RS80A US system (Samsung Medison Co., Ltd.) equipped with S-SWE (Samsung shear-wave elastography, a type of point shear wave technique) using a convex probe (CA1-7A). All patients fasted for at least 4 hours prior to the examination. Liver stiffness (LS) measurements, expressed in kilopascals (kPa), were done using an intercostal approach, with the patient placed in a supine position with the right arm maximally abducted above the head and performing expiratory breath-holds. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the right lobe of the liver at a depth of approximately 2–4 cm from its capsule, avoiding large vessels. At least 5 valid measurements were obtained, and the median LS value was taken as a representative value if, after consecutive measurements, an interquartile range (IQR)/median ratio ≤ 30% was achieved. S-SWE technique also automatically calculated a reliability measurement index (RMI), which demonstrated the reliability of each measurement. The RMI ranged from 0 to 1.0, with an RMI ≥ 0.4 being considered acceptable, according to the manufacturer’s instruction. We used the cutoffs for staging fibrosis (correlating to Metavir scoring system) of 7 kPa for ≥ F3 and 9,7 kPa for F4 [2426]. Scanning protocol also included grayscale (B-mode), color and spectral Doppler modes. Data acquired were archived in PHILIPS iSite Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) version 4.1.110.0. Each patient had at least 30 images acquired; there were no videos available.

Clinical, demographic and anthropometric data were collected during a short interview and also acquired from medical records (including the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3—SAPS-3). Laboratory tests were performed in the same day of US elastography examination (and also retrieved from medical records from previous ICU admission) and included liver enzymes, bilirubin levels, serum creatinine and urea, platelets, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (INR).

Statistical analyses

For descriptive purposes, categorical variables were presented through relative and absolute frequencies and compared by means of the chi-squared or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Continuous variables distributions were assessed for normality by skewness and kurtosis and graphical methods. Those with normal distribution were presented as mean and standard deviations and compared by the independent samples Student T test. Otherwise, they were presented as medians and quartiles and compared by the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. In order to address the association between liver stiffness and demographic and laboratory variables, correlation analysis was performed through the Spearman method, since US SWE parameters were non-normally distributed.

All tests were two-tailed and final p values under 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted with the SPSS software (IBM Corp. SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0. Armonk, NY).

Results

Eighteen individuals were included in the study and performed an evaluation with elastography at a median time of 185 (180–191) days after onset of symptoms. Fig 1 shows patient enrolment. Losses were due to incorrect or incomplete contact information or no attendance after 2 attempts of recruitment. Fifteen (83.3%) patients were male; median age was 47 (41–57) years and median body mass index was 23.6 (21.6–24.8) kg/m2. No patient had prior history of liver disease or was submitted to liver transplantation. Serologies for hepatitis A, B and C were negative for all patients. Two patients (11.1%) had been vaccinated for YF less than 10 days before admission. None was considered to have vaccinal disease, because only wild virus was detected with PCR. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (8–23) and median SAPS-3 at admission was 49 (45–60). At admission to the UCI, laboratory tests revealed high serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin (medians of 3479 U/L, 2531 U/L and 4.37 mg/dL, respectively), median serum creatinine of 1.43 mg/dL (1.06–4.59 mg/dL) and median serum urea concentration of 62 mg/dL (26–124 mg/dL). Median INR was 1.23 (1.10–1.40), and median platelet count was 55 units/mm3 (40.000–72.000 units/mm3). Lab results at 6 months after symptoms onset were within normal ranges. Seven (38.9%) patients used sofosbuvir for 10 days in a research protocol during the hospitalization [17,27]. Table 1 shows clinical, demographic, laboratory and elastography data.

Fig 1. Flow diagram of patient enrolment.

Fig 1

Of the 43 patients who survived severe yellow fever and were discharged, we managed to evaluate 18 patients with ultrasound elastography after 6 months of symptoms onset. Reasons for the losses of follow-up are specified on the right. PCR = Polymerase chain reaction. YF = Yellow fever. ICU = Intensive care unit. US = Ultrasound. SWE = Shear-wave elastography.

Table 1. Clinical, demographic, laboratory and elastography data of 18 patients who had severe yellow fever and were followed up to 6 months after onset of symptoms (descriptive statistics), Brazil, 2018*.

Variable N = 18
Age (years) (mean ± SD) 45.9 ± 14.8
    Median and quartiles 47 (41–57)
    Range 19–69
Male gender 15 (83.3)
Body mass index (median and quartiles) 23.6 (21.6–24.8)
Hypertension 4 (22.2)
Diabetes 3 (16.7)
Cardiac failure 2 (11.1)
Alcohol use (current) 9 (50.0)
SAPS-3 at admission (median and quartiles) 49 (45–60)
Length of hospital stay (days) (median and quartiles) 11 (8–23)
Sofosbuvir use 7 (38.9)
Laboratory results at admission
AST (U/L) (Median and quartiles) 3479 (2260–4124)
ALT (U/L) (Median and quartiles) 2531 (1790–2815)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) (median and quartiles) 4.37 (1.99–8.06)
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) (median and quartiles) 106 (100–132)
GGT (U/L) (median and quartiles) 279 (211–533)
Urea (mg/dL) (median and quartiles) 62 (26–124)
Creatinine (mg/dL) (median and quartiles) 1.43 (1.06–4.59)
INR (median and quartiles) 1.23 (1.10–1.40)
Platelets (1000 units/mm3) (median and quartiles) 55 (40–72)
Laboratory results at 6 months after onset of symptoms
AST (U/L) (median and quartiles) 24 (21–26)
ALT (U/L) (median and quartiles) 27 (19–37)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) (median and quartiles) 0.45 (0.30–0.61)
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) (median and quartiles) 71 (61–77)
GGT (U/L) (median and quartiles) 31 (23–51)
Urea (mg/dL) (median and quartiles) 32 (26–37)
Creatinine (mg/dL) (median and quartiles) 0.87 (0.83–1.11)
INR (median and quartiles) 0.99 (0.96–1.03)
Platelets (1000 units/mm3) (median and quartiles) 207 (175–246)
Time since onset of symptoms and elastography (days) (median and quartiles) 185 (180–191)
Shear wave velocity (m/s) (median and quartiles) 1.33 (1.24–1.46)
Liver stiffness (kPa) (median and quartiles) 5.3 (4.6–6.4)
Liver fibrosis categories (METAVIR)
    F0/F1 14 (77.8)
    F2 2 (11.1)
    F3 1 (5.6)
    F4 1 (5.6)

*Data presented as no. (%), except if specified otherwise. SD, Standard deviation. SAPS-3, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3. AST, aspartate aminotransferase. ALT, alanine aminotransferase. GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase. INR, international normalized ratio.

Regarding US findings with elastography evaluation (SWE) (Fig 2), median shear-wave velocity and LS were 1.33 m/s (1.24–1.46) and 5.3 (4.6–6.4) kPa, respectively. Two (11.1%) patients had mild fibrosis (F2), one (8.3%) had moderate fibrosis (F3) and one (8.3%) had cirrhosis (F4); these two last patients had signs of congestive heart failure, with features of cardiogenic liver congestion on Doppler analysis. All remaining patients had Doppler evaluation of superior abdomen (portal vein, hepatic veins and hepatic artery) within normal ranges. No patient showed morphologic changes of cirrhosis on grayscale mode (Table 1).

Fig 2. Right upper quadrant ultrasound of two patients using point shear-wave elastography technique.

Fig 2

(A) A 48-year-old male patient, and (B), a 38-year-old male patient, both asymptomatic, 6 months after onset of severe yellow fever. Images depict placement of regions of interest (ROIs) on the right lobe of the liver at expiratory breath-hold. Shear-wave velocities (in m/s) were generated, with corresponding liver stiffness values after multiple measurements of 5.3 kPa and 4.6 kPa, respectively. Both subjects were then classified as F0/F1 on the Metavir scoring system for staging of fibrosis. RMI = Reliability measurement index.

Table 2 compares clinical and demographic variables and laboratory results at admission with LS values obtained 6 months after onset of symptoms. Heart failure was associated with increased LS (p = 0.024); systemic arterial hypertension and diabetes showed a tendency towards this association (p = 0.063 and p = 0.066, respectively). After exclusion of the outlier patient (LS = 22,4 kPa, with cardiogenic liver congestion), there was a tendency towards statistical significance in the correlations between LS and age (ρ = 0.416, p = 0.096) and between LS and alanine aminotransferase at admission (ρ = -0.479, p = 0.052) (Fig 3). We found no significant association between LS and gender, BMI, alcohol consumption, hospitalization time or other laboratorial results.

Table 2. Differences in fibrosis estimations of 18 patients who had severe yellow fever 6 months after onset of symptoms according to clinical and demographic characteristics, Brazil, 2018.

Variable Liver stiffness (kPa) (median and quartiles) p value
Gender Female 6.40 (5.90–22.40) 0.075
Male 5.10 (4.40–9.30)
Hypertension Yes 7.60 (5.55–22.40) 0.063
No 4.95 (4.40–7.00)
Diabetes Yes 9.30 (5.20–22.40) 0.066
No 5.10 (4.40–7.00)
Cardiac failure Yes 15.85 (9.30–22.40) 0.024
No 5.15 (4.50–7.00)
Alcohol use (current) Yes 5.90 (5.20–9.30) 0.102
No 4.80 (4.40–22.40)
Sofosbuvir use Yes 4.60 (4.40–6.40) 0.070
No 5.90 (4.80–22.40)

†Statistical significance.

Fig 3. Correlations between liver stiffness and clinical and laboratorial variables.

Fig 3

Age (A) and alanine aminotransferase (B) and its correlations with liver stiffness, using the Spearman method (levels of significance of p = 0.096 and p = 0.052, respectively). kPa = Kilopascals.

Considering the cutoff for significant fibrosis (≥ F2), differences in clinical and laboratory data during hospitalization are shown in Table 3. Cardiac failure was associated with a Metavir score ≥ F2 (50% versus 0; p = 0.039). There was a tendency towards an association between higher SAPS-3 values at hospital admission and significant fibrosis at 6 months after onset of symptoms (medians of 71 versus 47; p = 0.053). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequencies or median values of other variables between these two groups of participants.

Table 3. Clinical and laboratory data at hospitalization according to liver fibrosis staging (with or without significant fibrosis) of 18 patients at 6 months after onset of symptoms of severe yellow fever, Brazil, 2018.

Variable Fibrosis stage
F0/1 (n = 14) ≥ F2 (n = 4) p value
Age (years) (median and quartiles) 46.5 (38.0–48.0) 57 (47–61.5) 0.242
Male gender 12 (85.7) 3 (75.0) 1.000
Body mass index (median and quartiles) 22.7 (21.3–24.3) 27.8 (23.2–31.8) 0.151
Hypertension 2 (14.3) 2 (50.0) 0.197
Diabetes 1 (7.1) 2 (50.0) 0.108
Cardiac failure 0 2 (50.0) 0.039
Alcohol use (current) 6 (42.9) 3 (75.0) 0.576
SAPS-3 at admission (median and quartiles) 47 (42–60) 71 (54–73) 0.053
Length of hospital stay (days) (median and quartiles) 10 (8–25) 18 (12–21) 0.709
Sofosbuvir use 7 (50.0) 0 0.119
AST (U/L) (median and quartiles) 3238 (2260–4124) 3518 (2327–4102) 0.915
ALT (U/L) (median and quartiles) 2631 (1790–3067) 1937 (1475–2410) 0.243
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) (median and quartiles) 3.2 (2.0–8.1) 6.1 (3.3–14.9) 0.524
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) (median and quartiles) 105 (100–129) 140 (89–184) 0.524
GGT (U/L) (median and quartiles) 261 (211–533) 371 (174–566) 0.791
INR (median and quartiles) 1.2 (1.1–1.4) 1.3 (1.2–1.7) 0.396
Fibrinogen (mg/dL) 133 (121–146) 148 (124–215) 0.594
Factor V (%) 92 (65–133) 118 (67–132) 0.873

*Data presented as no. (%), except if specified otherwise.

†Statistical significance. SAPS-3, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3. AST, aspartate aminotransferase. ALT, alanine aminotransferase. GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase. INR, international normalized ratio.

No patient who received sofosbuvir showed liver fibrosis at 6 months after onset of symptoms, compared with 4 (36.4%) individuals who had fibrosis (≥ F2) in the group that did not receive the drug. This difference did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion

This is a unprecedent investigation on this rare but reemergent and severe disease. Our study managed to determine the frequency of liver fibrosis in severe YF surviving patients, utilizing a modern US SWE technique, with good reproducibility and correlation to liver biopsy[18]. High grades of LS were found in a small percentage of patients, similar to the prevalence in the general population[2830], indicating that the liver recovers at least in great portion after the initial viral insult (analogous to what was suggested in prior reports for other viral hepatitis[15,16]). Thus, US with SWE showed to be a valid an noninvasive method to evaluate these patients, without the disadvantages of conventional biopsy[31].

Nevertheless, some clinical characteristic seemed to be associated with increased LS. Older age was predictably correlated to higher LS values, as expected; chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension also demonstrated a tendency towards this association. We found a tendency to a negative correlation between alanine aminotransferase at admission and LS; it is more likely that this association be spurious than a real and protective factor. Higher SAPS-3 showed a tendency of an association with significant fibrosis and could potentially represent a predictor of long-term fibrosis. Cardiac failure, a condition that determines hepatic congestion, was present in two of 18 patients at 6 months after onset of symptoms, both of which had increased LS; however, this result was most likely a “false-positive”, since edema of liver tissue leads to increased stiffness not related to fibrous tissue[32]. For a similar reason, acquiring a “baseline” SWE at hospitalization would not be valid (nor feasible) due to inflammation and edema of the hepatic parenchyma during the acute phase, also associated to increased LS [16,33,34]. No other clinical or laboratory variable showed to be a predictor of fibrosis.

Sofosbuvir administration during the hospitalization period, as a part of a randomized clinical trial for treatment of acute YF occurring concomitantly in our institution[27], might have altered the proportions of fibrosis during the follow up period. Corroborating with this is the fact that no patient that used sofosbuvir was categorized as having significant fibrosis at the time of completion of 6 months after onset of symptoms (although that difference did not reach statistical significance). There was also a report of high incidence of late-onset relapsing hepatitis in these patients (that is, a new elevation in aminotransferase levels within 6 months after an improvement in or normalization of liver function, occurring in up to 45%, according to a recent study[17]), but this have not seemed to alter our results.

No patient in our sample was adequately immunized for YF or had vaccinal disease. It is important to note that, by the time of this outbreak, the city of São Paulo and its outskirts were not yet included in the areas of universal (i.e. permanent) YF vaccination, presenting a low vaccination coverage [35,36].

Some limitations of this work must be acknowledged. The small sample size, inherent to the epidemiology of the disease, must be taken into account. Although not sufficient to ensure adequate power to the statistical analysis and to confirm the hypothesis, it retains great relevance and represents a unique window of opportunity in the context of a rare disease, never yet studied in this scale. The observational nature of the investigation brings a series of usual bias, and thus we tried to avoid them by following strict rules and protocols. There was no control group whatsoever; we then needed to compare our findings to populational statistics, not always comparable (e.g., with the same characteristics) to our group of individuals. The lack of a baseline evaluation, in turn, can be justified by the aforementioned argument–it would not be possible to evaluate patients at the acute phase of yellow fever with SWE since acute inflammation changes (increases) LS. It is also of note that no patient had prior history of liver disease and hepatitis viruses were ruled out. There were many losses of follow up due to logistic problems, lack of contact information or no attendances, and this might have affected the results. Furthermore, survival bias is likely to have occurred, since patients that died at hospital could have had a higher probability of developing liver fibrosis if fatal outcome have not happened. Also, there are still no trustworthy cutoffs for fibrosis using acoustic radiation force impulse (SWE techniques) by different fabricators and to different diseases[18,37,38], hence we preferably used the absolute values of LS (continuous variable) to express our results.

In conclusion, we believe our work increases the knowledge of the natural history of this rare disease. US can be a tool to evaluate the liver in patients during the acute phase of severe YF, as it was demonstrated in our previous study [23], but can also be of value and have a role in the follow up of patients of age and / or with comorbidities after hospital discharge. Increased SAPS-3 might be associated with liver fibrosis after survival, but this result needs to be confirmed by further studies.

Supporting information

S1 STROBE checklist

(DOCX)

Abbreviations

ICU

intensive care unit

kPa

kilopascals

LS

liver stiffness

SWE

shear-wave elastography

US

ultrasound

YF

yellow fever

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Monath TP, Vasconcelos PFC. Yellow fever. J Clin Virol. 2015;64: 160–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.08.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Franco O. História da Febre Amarela no Brasil. Ministério da Saúde—Departamento Nacional de Endemias Rurais. 1969. pp. 1–210. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vasconcelos PF da C. Yellow fever in Brazil: thoughts and hypotheses on the emergence in previously free areas Febre amarela no Brasil: reflexões e hipóteses sobre a emergência em áreas previamente livres. Rev Saude Publica. 2010;44: 1144–1149. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102010005000046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Secretaria de Estado da Saúde São Paulo. Boletim Epidemiológico Febre Amarela. In: Centro de Vigilancia Epidemiologica Professor Alexandre Vranjac, ed. Vol 28/12/2018. São Paulo, 2018.
  • 5.Monath TP. Yellow fever: An update. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1: 11–20. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00016-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Quaresma JAS, Pagliari C, Medeiros DBA, Duarte MIS, Vasconcelos PFC. Immunity and immune response, pathology and pathologic changes: progress and challenges in the immunopathology of yellow fever. Rev Med Virol. 2013;23: 305–318. doi: 10.1002/rmv.1752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Quaresma JAS, Barros VLRS, Pagliari C, Fernandes ER, Andrade HF, Vasconcelos PFC, et al. Hepatocyte lesions and cellular immune response in yellow fever infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101: 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Song ATW, D’Albuquerque LAC. Acute Liver Failure Secondary to Yellow Fever: A Challenging Scenario. Clin Liver Dis. 2019;13: 58–61. doi: 10.1002/cld.784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duarte-neto AN, Cunha MP, Marcilio I, Song ATW, Martino RB De, Ho Y, et al. Yellow fever and orthotopic liver transplantation: new insights from the autopsy room for an old but re-emerging disease. Histopathology. 2019;May 14: 1–11. doi: 10.1111/his.13904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kallas EG, Moreira CH V, Buccheri R, Diniz GBF, Costa PR, Dias JZC, et al. Predictors of mortality in patients with yellow fever: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19: 750–758. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30125-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilder-smith A, Chen LH, Melo A, Visser LG. Improving clinical management of patients with severe yellow fever. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;3099: 10–11. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30122-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ho Y, Joelsons D, Leite GFC, Malbouisson LMS, Song ATW, Perondi B, et al. Severe yellow fever in Brazil: clinical characteristics and management. J Travel Med. 2019;26: 1–7. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taz040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Casadio L, Salles A, Malta F, Leite G, Ho Y, Gomes-Gouvêa M, et al. Lipase and factor V (but not viral load) are prognostic factors for the evolution of severe yellow fever cases. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2019;114: 1–8. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760190033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ribeiro AF, Cavalin RF, Muhamad J, Hamid A, Alves J, Vasconcelos MJ de, et al. Yellow Fever: Factors Associated with Death in a Hospital of Reference in Infectious Diseases, São Paulo, Brazil, 2018. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101: 180–188. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim JH, Yim HJ, Kim SY, Ahn JH, Jung YK, Joo MK, et al. Changes in liver stiffness after acute or chronic liver injury due to viral hepatitis—does fibrosis exist after recovery from acute viral hepatitis? Korean J Gastroenterol. 2009;54: 155–161. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2009.54.3.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Viganò M, Massironi S, Lampertico P, Iavarone M, Paggi S, Pozzi R, et al. Transient elastography assessment of the liver stiffness dynamics during acute hepatitis B. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22: 180–184. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328332d2fa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Casadio L, Nastri AC, Malta FM, Araujo J, Silva JB, Salomao J, et al. Late-Onset Relapsing Hepatitis Associated with Yellow Fever. N Engl J Med. 2020;382: 2059–2061. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1913036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Barr RG, Wilson SR, Rubens D, Garcia-Tsao G, Ferraioli G. Update to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Liver Elastography Consensus Statement. Radiology. 2020;296: 263–274. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heller MT, Tublin ME. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of diffuse liver disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014;52: 1163–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M, Sporea I, Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Strobel D, et al. Performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: A pooled meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19: 212–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01537.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pavlides M, Birks J, Fryer E, Delaney D, Sarania N, Banerjee R, et al. Interobserver variability in histologic evaluation of liver fibrosis using categorical and quantitative scores. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;147: 364–369. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elm E Von, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Peter C. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. 2007; 19–22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Neves YCS, Castro-Lima VAC, Solla DJF, Ogata VSM, Pereira FL, Araujo JM, et al. Ultrasound Findings and Laboratory Predictors of Early Mortality in Patients with Severe Yellow Fever. Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216: 1392–1399. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Joo I, Kim SY, Park HS, Lee ES, Kang HJ, Lee JM. Validation of a New Point Shear-Wave Elastography Method for Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20: 1527–1535. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahn SJ, Lee JM, Chang W, Lee SM, Kang HJ, Yang H, et al. Prospective validation of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of a new point shear wave elastographic technique for assessing liver stiffness in patients with chronic liver disease. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18: 926–935. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaposi P, Unger Z, Fejér B, Kucsa A, Tóth A, Folhoffer A, et al. Interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of shearwave elastography for the staging of hepatitis C virus-associated liver fibrosis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2019; 1–8. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Figueiredo-Mello C, Casadio LVB, Avelino-Silva VI, Yeh-Li H, Sztajnbok J, Joelsons D, et al. Efficacy of sofosbuvir as treatment for yellow fever: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Brazil (SOFFA study). BMJ Open. 2019;9: 1–5. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Caballería L, Pera G, Arteaga I, Rodríguez L, Alumà A, Morillas RM, et al. High Prevalence of Liver Fibrosis Among European Adults With Unknown Liver Disease: A Population-Based Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16: 1138–1145.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.García-Compeán D, Villarreal-Pérez JZ, Cavazos ME de la O, Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Borjas-Almaguer OD, Del Cueto-Aguilera AN, et al. Prevalence of liver fibrosis in an unselected general population with high prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Time for screening? Ann Hepatol. 2020;19: 258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harris R, Harman DJ, Card TR, Aithal GP, Guha IN. Prevalence of clinically significant liver disease within the general population, as defined by non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis: a systematic review. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2: 288–297. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30205-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Duarte-Neto AN, Monteiro RA de A, Johnsson J, Cunha M dos P, Pour SZ, Saraiva AC, et al. Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive autopsy as a tool for rapid post-mortem diagnosis in the 2018 Sao Paulo yellow fever epidemic: Correlation with conventional autopsy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: 1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S, Fonouni H, Golriz M, Mehrabi A, et al. Liver stiffness is directly influenced by central venous pressure. J Hepatol. 2010;52: 206–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Arena U, Vizzutti F, Corti G, Ambu S, Stasi C, Bresci S, et al. Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2008;47: 380–384. doi: 10.1002/hep.22007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Seo YS, Um SH, Suh SJ, Jung ES, Jang JS, Kwon YD, et al. Changes in liver stiffness during the course of acute hepatitis A. Korean J Hepatol. 2008;14: 465–473. doi: 10.3350/kjhep.2008.14.4.465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shearer FM, Moyes CL, Pigott DM, Brady OJ, Marinho F, Deshpande A, et al. Global yellow fever vaccination coverage from 1970 to 2016: an adjusted retrospective analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17: 1209–1217. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30419-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ministério da Saúde. Emergência epidemiológica de febre amarela no Brasil, no período de dezembro de 2016 a julho de 2017. Bol Epidemiológico. 2017;48: 1–22.
  • 37.Ferraioli G, Wong VWS, Castera L, Berzigotti A, Sporea I, Dietrich CF, et al. Liver Ultrasound Elastography: An Update to the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines and Recommendations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018;44: 2419–2440. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A, Bota S, Cantisani V, Castera L, et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2017. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-103952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009594.r001

Decision Letter 0

Elizabeth J Carlton, Michael R Holbrook

1 Jun 2021

Dear Dr. Neves,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Staging liver fibrosis after severe yellow fever with ultrasound elastography in Brazil: A six-month follow-up study" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

The reviewers raised important comments regarding vaccination status of the patients included in the study and also the need to acknowledge the limitations of the small sample size. These should be addressed in the revision. In addition, we request two clarifications to the statistical analyses. The analysis of the association between LS and lipase should address the influence of the outlier value. The statistical methods sections notes the use of GLM for repeated measures and examination of interactions but it appears each person had only one SWE evaluation and no discussion of interactions are presented in the results. Please clarify the statistical analyses methods and ensure they align with the analyses presented in the results (it can be useful to start the statistical analysis methods by reminding the reader the question(s) you are trying to address through statistical analysis).

We would like to apologize for the extended period it took to complete the review of your manuscript. Given the current international health crisis, it is taking some time to identify and complete reviews.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Michael R Holbrook, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Elizabeth Carlton

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

We would like to apologize for the extended period it took to complete the review of your manuscript. Given the current international health crisis, it is taking some time to identify and complete reviews.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The manuscript present a unique opportunity to evaluate the convalescent phase of a uncommon disease such a Yellow fever. As this disease presents sporadically, the chance to take direct measures of clinical parameters presents in a constrict time window that must be used, in order to better understand how the pathophysiology develops and have under-notice effects on this survivors.

With a reasonable number of UCI survivors of a disease with such a high reported mortality rate, the authors deliver a compelling argument substantiated with rigorous measurements and statistics.

All patients signed the informed consent and the projects was approved by the corresponding ethics committee.

The conclusions are interesting and solid.

I do recommend the present work for publication without hesitation.

Reviewer #2: The historical cohort design is suitable for assessing risk factors and the evolution / outcome of yellow fever. The sample size is probably not sufficient to ensure adequate power to the statistics analysis but the small sample is inherent to the epidemiology of the disease. No ethical concerns were identified.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: My criteria was included in the Instructions section.

Reviewer #2: The results were presented properly.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: My criteria was included in the Instructions section.

Reviewer #2: It is an interesting work about a relatively rare disease. However, due to the small sample the study can only generate hypothesis.

Considering that yellow fever is a vaccine-preventable disease and São Paulo is an area with a yellow fever vaccine recommendation, would be interesting to know about the vaccine status of the study subjects. Is this information available?

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: None.

Reviewer #2: Please note that some terms need to be revised:

In the line 137, please review the term mortality (it’s probably lethality).

In the line 141, please review the term mortality rate (maybe “case fatality rate”).

Line 257 – lab results WERE.

In the line, 394, please review the reference. “Prof. Alexandre Vranjac” is the name of the Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica, not the author of the reference.

Data did not mention if the subjects were vaccinated – maybe it is an important information.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript present a unique opportunity to evaluate the convalescent phase of a uncommon disease such a Yellow fever. As this disease presents sporadically, the chance to take direct measures of clinical parameters presents in a constrict time window that must be used, in order to better understand how the pathophysiology develops and have under-notice effects on this survivors.

With a reasonable number of UCI survivors of a disease with such a high reported mortality rate, the authors deliver a compelling argument substantiated with rigorous measurements and statistics.

All patients signed the informed consent and the projects was approved by the corresponding ethics committee.

The conclusions are interesting and solid.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009594.r003

Decision Letter 1

Elizabeth J Carlton, Michael R Holbrook

24 Jun 2021

Dear Neves,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Staging liver fibrosis after severe yellow fever with ultrasound elastography in Brazil: A six-month follow-up study' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Michael R Holbrook, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Elizabeth Carlton

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009594.r004

Acceptance letter

Elizabeth J Carlton, Michael R Holbrook

15 Jul 2021

Dear Neves,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Staging liver fibrosis after severe yellow fever with ultrasound elastography in Brazil: A six-month follow-up study," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 STROBE checklist

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response Letter to the Editor and Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES