Recent updates on immunological, pharmacological, and alternative approaches to combat COVID-19

Abstract

The pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is instigated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that is mainly transmitted via the inhalation route and characterized by fever, coughing and shortness of breath. COVID-19 affects all age groups with no single cure. The drug discovery, manufacturing, and safety studies require extensive time and sources and, therefore, struggled to match the exponential spread of COVID-19. Yet, various repurposed drugs (antivirals, immune-modulators, nucleotide analogues), and convalescent plasma therapy have been authorized for emergency use against COVID-19 by Food and Drug Administration under certain limits and conditions. The discovery of vaccine is the biggest milestone achieved during the current pandemic era. About nine vaccines were developed for human use with varying claims of efficacy. The rapid emergence of mutations in SARS-CoV-2, suspected adverse drug reactions of current therapies in special population groups and limited availability of drugs in developing countries necessitate the development of more efficacious, safe and cheap drugs/vaccines for treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Keeping in view these limitations, the current review provides an update on the efficacy and safety of the repurposed, and natural drugs to treat COVID-19 as well as the vaccines used for its prophylaxis.

Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is instigated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Yuan et al. 2020). In November 2019, Wuhan became the emerging key zone of a novel coronavirus outbreak that was characterized by upper and lower respiratory tract distress and proceeded to deleterious systemic manifestation and premature mortality. It is notorious for its exponential rise in the number of infected individuals of any age. This coronavirus was isolated and labelled as the novel virus corona disease 2019 (nCOV-2019) by Chinese scientists followed by its genome sequencing in January 2020. It caused deaths of more than 1800 while infected more than 70,000 individuals within the first 5 days of this COVID-19 that was latterly stated as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) (Lu et al. 2020; Lai et al. 2020). To date, about 162 million people are infected and 33 million people have died owing to this malicious infection. It is mainly transmitted via inhalation route due to sneezing droplet of infective patient (Jiang et al. 2021).

Novel coronavirus (family: coronaviridae; genera; β-coronavirus) is a greatly varied, enclosed, and single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus that has nucleocapsid with helical symmetry (Khan et al. 2020). Coronavirus has spikes like a crown on its outermost surface, tiny in size (dia: 65–125 nm), and 26–32 kbs length of single-stranded RNA (Shereen et al. 2020; Jiang et al. 2021).

The positive patient expresses either symptom, that of various severity or is symptomless depending on different factors as immunity and a variant of COVID-19. The most prevailing symptoms include fever, coughing, shortness of breath, diarrhea, and vomiting. The clinical evaluation of most patients has shown a normal or low level of WBCs and lymphocytopenia. But in serious conditions, C-reactive protein, neutrophil count, blood urea, d-dimer and creatinine levels are profoundly raised. Additionally, upregulation of inflammatory mediators, i.e. interleukin (IL)-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α contribute to the immune-compromised status of the patients (Quer et al. 2021). People with underlying diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and elderly are highly prone to develop respiratory distress syndrome, coagulation, and septic shock that are hard to correct even leading to the death (Wu et al. 2021).

Pathogenesis of COVID-19

The association of S protein with host cell surface receptors initiates virus infection. The cellular serine proteases TMPRSS2 will cleave the S protein into S1 and S2 (Walls et al. 2020). The C-terminal domain (CTD) of S1 particularly attaches to the receptor of host cell angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and induces the conformational change of S2 that instigates the release of virus’s genome into the cytoplasm (Wang et al. 2020c). The viral RNA prompts replication and transcription, latterly, newly ensemble viruses are discharged out extracellularly via exocytosis (Fehr et al. 2015; Ray and Maunsell 2011). The target receptor sites for COVID-19 infection in host body are presented in Table 1

Table 1.

Mechanism of target receptors sites and their actions in Covid-19 virus in host

Target receptor	Activity	Target human cells	References
Aminopeptidase N (APN)	Aids S protein mediated entry of virus into host cells	URT	(Li et al. 2018; Wong et al. 2017)
Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)	Aids entry of coronavirus into host, replication and normal function of ACE2 is blocked	URT	(Jia et al. 2005; Wong et al. 2017)
O-acetylated sialic acid	Aids entry into the cell through S1 protein	URT	(Hulswit et al. 2019)
ACE2	Aids entry of virus into cell	LRT	(Hoffmann et al. 2020)
Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4)	Acts as the entry gate for virus spike protein in the host cell	LRT	(Pitocco et al. 2020)

Upper (U), respiratory tract: RT, Lower: L

The virus disseminates downward to the RT causing a vigorous innate immune response. The level of inflammatory chemokines (CXCL10) and cytokines is increased in bronchial airways which cause the recruitment of leukocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, natural killer (NK) cells and ILs that trigger gigantic inflammatory reaction (Mason 2020). The whole process affects gas exchange units of the lungs, which cause severe difficulty in breathing. High expression of inflammatory mediator’s causes narrowing of the airways and unwanted robust innate immune response which result in fever, cough, and pneumonia-like symptoms.

It has been documented in COVID-19 infected patients that there is cerebral interference may occur in the early or later stage of the infection. The appearance of the COVID-19 virus in the general circulation allows it to reach the cerebral circulation, where even the virus spike protein interacts with ACE2 receptors expressed in capillary endothelium which further leads to harm the vessels and draw access to the brain. In the neuronal tissues, it interacts with ACE2 specific receptors in neurons, triggering a cycle of viral budding and neuronal damage without causing substantial inflammation (Palasca et al. 2018; Baig et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020a). The endothelium of cerebral capillary ruptures followed by bleeding inside the cerebral tissue, may prove fatal to COVID-19 patients.

The multifold transmission of different variants of COVID-19 emerges the intense demand for curative/prophylactic therapy to combat that dilemma of the present era. To date, there are few reports on possible preventive approaches or vaccine candidates. Clinical trials (CT) for COVID-19 therapies are being conducted, though, data from broad randomized clinical trials (RCT) are still deficient (Felsenstein et al. 2020). Due to time-consuming challenges of developing, testing, and manufacturing new medications, repurposing of proven medicinal remedies such as anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and anticoagulants offer a pragmatic alternative for symptomatic treatment of the COVID-19 infection (Harrison 2020).

Currently, antiviral, immune-modulators, nucleoside analogues, neuraminidase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and antimalarial drugs are some of the drug options used in the treatment of this fatal infection (Reche et al. 2020). Medicinal plants and their secondary metabolites such as flavonoids have exhibited substantial antiviral activity for different human viruses, including human immune deficiency virus (HIV), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), hepatitis C virus, (HCV), SARS, and influenza viruses. Moreover, they have shown positive response in the management of COVID-19 (Adhikari et al. 2021). Presently, more than 300 COVID-19 vaccine projects are under different phases, of which 40 are evaluated in CT, 10 in Phase III and three have completed Phase III with positive consequences (Forni and Mantovani 2021); (Lurie et al. 2020). The current literature focuses on various available therapeutic options as well vaccines against COVID-19.

Brief review of COVID-19 available therapies

Various therapeutic options for COVID-19 are explored in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Therapeutic strategy for COVID-19

Antiviral drugs

The viral life cycle steps as well as virus entry and immune response are resilient targets for therapeutic drugs. The spike protein, ACE2, TMPRSS2, chymotrypsin like protease (3CLpro), RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), and papain-like protease (PLpro) are deliberated as chief targets for antiviral drugs against COVID-19 due to their high catalytic action and similarity with SARS-CoV-2 (Tallei et al. 2020). While certain mutations allow the virus to tightly affix to the host receptor and boost receptor transmissibility, which probably upsurge the infection transmission/prevalence. When the virus is inhaled, it comes in contact with epithelial cells of the nasal cavity and starts replicating and produce an innate immune response to a limited extent (Mason 2020).

Remdesivir (wide spectrum), an adenosine nucleotide analogue and a wide spectrum antiviral drug developed in 2014 for the treatment of Ebola Virus (EBV), is now being used for COVID-19 infection by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Remdesivir stops replication and showed effective results in the treatment of later stages of COVID-19. It incorporates in single-stranded RNA of corona virus by polymerase enzyme, inhibit the addition of more RNA subunits and obstruct genome replication (Stebbing et al. 2020) as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Various allopathic treatments of COVID-19. Targeting viral entry mechanisms, possible methods for blocking ACE2 receptors, and antiviral drugs in replication stage [modified from (Majumder and Minko 2021)]. scFv single-chain variable fragment, TCZ tocilizumab

Favipiravir (synthetic prodrug), originally a purine nucleotide, effectively inhibits RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and averts virus production. It is used against influenza and EBV viruses and has shown broad activity against many other RNA virus (SARS-CoV-2) (Udwadia et al. 2021).

The disulfiram, a disulphide, an authorized medicine for alcohol misuse, is widely acclaimed to block the MERS and SARS PLpro, now present a potential role against SARS-Cov2. It inhibits the release of viral genome by hindering the papain-like protease in SARS-CoV2 (Majumder and Minko 2021; Beck et al. 2020). The combination of disulfiram/ebselen and remdesivir is found effective against COVID-19 by hindering replication step in in vitro study (Chen et al. 2021). This combination is a multitarget strategy effective against all types of corona viruses with conserved zinc (Zn⁺) ejection site.

Various therapeutic drugs target sites and action in COVID-19 are illustrated in Fig. 2 and Table 2.

Table 2.

Current allopathic therapies and their actions and potential adverse effects in COVID-19

Drug class	Therapeutic drug	Actions	Adverse effects	References
Antimalarial	Chloroquine phosphate	Glycosylation inhibitor Proteolytic, inhibition of cytokines production, autophagy, lysosomal and host cell activity	Cramps in the abdomen, diarrhea, anorexia CVD symptoms, hypoglycemia, retinal damage, neuropsychiatric toxicity, Idiosyncratic reactions	(Vijayvargiya et al. 2020)
Antiviral	Remdesivir	Inhibition of RNA polymerase	Transaminases elevation, kidney damage	(Stebbing et al. 2020)
	Favipiravir	Inhibition of RNA polymerase	Hyperuricemia, diarrhoea, ↑Transaminases, ↓Neutrophil count	(Udwadia et al. 2021)
Monoclonal antibody	Tocilizumab	Block IL-6 receptor alpha subunit	GIT disorders, skin/subcutaneous infections and altered liver enzymes	(Luo et al. 2020b)
Anti-HIV	Lopinavir/ritonavir	Inhibit 3C-like proteinase (3CLpro) and papain-like proteinase (PLpro) resulted in immature virus particle in COVID-19	GIT intolerance, pancreatitis, abnormalities in cardiac conduction, hepatotoxicity	(Consortium WST 2021)
Antiprotease	Disulfiram	Papain like protease inhibitor	Hypotension, tachycardia	(Majumder and Minko 2021)

Gastrointestinal: GIT, cardiovascular disorders: CVD

Immuno-modulators

Tocilizumab (TCZ), anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody, is now used for COVID-19 patients (Luo et al. 2020b). It blocks cytokine storm and potentially stabilizes the condition of patients. But it is preferred to use for critically ill patients in repeated doses (Wu et al. 2021).

The TCZ in combination with lopinavir and methylprednisolone is also suggested for the treatment of COVID-19 patients especially in severe cases (David J Cennimo 2020). IL-6 is a multipurpose cytokine that is involved in B-cell differentiation, thrombopoiesis stimulation, protein synthesis and also bone resorption. It prevents the interaction of interleukin with signal transducer glycoprotein (130 complexes) and IL-6R. As a result, after involving the Janus-kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins signalling pathway, it inhibits cis and trans signalling cascades (Biggioggero et al. 2019).

Corticosteroids are also used in the management of COVID-19. They block inflammatory storm especially in lungs, which otherwise could lead to acute lung injury and acute breathing distress syndrome (ARDS) (Russell et al. 2020). Dexamethasone (Dex) is the very first lifesaving drug showed therapeutic effectiveness in COVID-19. In the largest COVID-19 RCT, the so-called RECOVERY trial, six interventions were under evaluation including Dex, hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, anti-HIV drug combination lopinavir–ritonavir, TCZ, and healed patient convalescent plasma. No clinical benefit was reported for hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir–ritonavir in hospitalized patients in the first and third statements published by the RECOVERY chief investigators. The second quote indicated Dex (6 mg/day; orally or intravenous infusion administered for 10 days) reduced the numbers of COVID-19 deaths in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with oxygen therapy (35%). The death rate was decreased 20% under oxygen therapy. Moreover, nanodelivery of Dex is assumed to be more efficacious than conventional in COVID-19 patients (Lammers et al. 2020).

Chloroquine, an antimalarial agent with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, had acquired great attention as a possible therapeutic alternative for COVID-19 treatment (Vijayvargiya et al. 2020).

Antibody and convalescent plasma (CP) therapy

The CP therapy was suggested by the FDA (21 Apr 2021) in emergency use authorization (EUA) for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The high titer CP was recommended in the EAU against COVID-19 in hospitalized and immune deficient patients, nevertheless use of low titer CP is restricted in EUA (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The generation of recombinant human monoclonal antibody (mAb) provides a path to neutralize COVID-19 virus by interacting with the spike protein (S glycoprotein) present on its surface. CR3022, SARS-CoV specific antibody, binds to the receptor-binding domain (RBD), recognized as a therapeutic candidate against COVID-19 infection (Wang et al. 2020a). Other monoclonal antibodies like 47D11, m396 and CR3014 are also used for the treatment of corona virus infection (Zhang and Liu 2020; Yuan et al. 2020).

Natural products

The medicinal plants and phytocomponents exhibited synergistic effects against the COVID-19 and boosted the immune system such as Citrus limon, Nigella sativa, Withania somnifera, etc. Previous studies reported the immune booster effect of these plants in COVID-19 infection that acted by binding and hindering to 3CLpro, main protease (Mpro), papain-like protease (PLpro), and spike protein in COVID-19 (Tallei et al. 2020). The edible foods such as cinnamon, pepper, olive, black nightshade, passion fruit, and grapes are also effective in prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. These plants have ACE2 inhibition activity and have been used in coronavirus patients with comorbidities of hypertension and diabetes (da Silva Antonio et al. 2020; Daskaya-Dikmen et al. 2017). Some plants have been used as 3C-like protease (3CLpro) inhibitors such as lemon, balm, lavender, geranium, basil, cinnamon, and ginger.

Quercetin, strong antioxidant, is a flavonoid derivative isolated from several fruits and vegetables such as Foeniculum vulgare, and Allium cepa. It blocked (82%) SARS-CoV protease (Huang et al. 2020). It showed antiviral properties against SARS-CoV-2 in docking study using 3CLpro and other crucial targets (Tallei et al. 2020). Previously, it was reported that quercetin binds to spike protein, ACE2, RdRp, and PLpro, which assured its anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential.

Andrographolide (diterpene), an efficient antiviral, is extracted from Andrographis paniculata and binds to spike protein, ACE2, 3CLpro, RdRp, and PLpro (Kishore et al. 2017) that indicated its possible efficacy against COVID-19. Glycyrrhizic acid, a polyphenol derived from Glycyrrhiza glabra root binds to ACE2 receptor hence effective against SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 (Luo et al. 2020a). Furthermore, it inhibits immune hyperactivation and production of cytokine storm (He et al. 2020). Baicalin, is a flavone glycoside and non-peptidomimetic inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro (Chen et al. 2017).

Patchouli alcohol (PA), a sesquiterpene has antiviral, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and antitumor properties (Hu et al. 2017). The molecular docking showed the binding of PA to SARS-CoV-2 related targets and explored the satisfactory binding of PA to RdRp which assured its antiviral effect.

Luteolin, a naturally occurring flavonoid, has anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiviral, and heart-protective properties (Fasuan et al. 2018). SARS-CoV 3CLpro was inhibited by luteolin derived from Torreya Nucifera (Ryu et al. 2010). Various phytochemicals and their target sites for COVID-19 therapy are mentioned in Table 3 and Fig. 3.

Table 3.

Natural compounds and their potent mechanism of action against COVID-19

Natural Compounds	Class	Source	Mechanism of action	References
Quercetin	Flavonol	Dysosma pleiantha	Hinders ( ×) CLp and block virus entry into the cell	(Nguyen et al. 2012; Al Hamdany et al. 2019)
Andrographolide	Diterpenoid	Andrographis paniculata	× CLp and virus-induced stimulation of RLRs signalling pathway	(Enmozhi et al. 2021; Rao et al. 2004; Malik et al. 2021)
Glycyrrhizic acid	Polyphenols	Glycyrrhiza glabra	× replication and permeation of the virus	(Luo et al. 2020a; Petramfar et al. 2020; Nazari et al. 2017)
Baicalin	Flavone glycoside	Radix Scutellariae	× CLp	(Su et al. 2020; Okoshi et al. 2021)
Patchouli alcohol	Sesquiterpene alcohol	Pogostemon cablin	Bind with RdRp and produce inhibitory effects	(Yu et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2017)
Luteolin	Flavone	Cuminum cyminum Torreya nucifera	× CLp and blocks viral replication in early stage of contamination	(Yan et al. 2019; Kempuraj et al. 2021; Goodarzi et al. 2020)
Hesperidin	Flavanone glycoside	Citrus sinensis	× CLp	(Joshi et al. 2021; Sim 2019; Selmi et al. 2017)
Emodin	Anthraquinone	Aloe vera	Blocks the SARS-CoV2 spike protein and ACE2 interaction and reduce virus release	(Schwarz et al. 2011; Kumar et al. 2017)
Resveratrol	Phenol	Vitis vinifera	× RNA and nucleocapsid expression	(Lin et al. 2017; Hasan and Bae 2017)
Kaempferol	Flavanol	Dysosma pleiantha	× 3a channel protein	(Karuppaiya and Tsay 2020)
Lignan	Polyphenols	Phyllanthus tenellus Roxb	× virus replication and CLp	(Lee et al. 2015; Szopa et al. 2021)
Betulinic acid	Triterpenoid	Yarrowia lipolytica	× virus replication and CLp	(Hordyjewska et al. 2019; Jin et al. 2019)
Tanshinone	Diterpene quinone	Salvia xantocheila	× CLp and PLpro	(Hirai et al. 2015; Fotovvat et al. 2017)
Cryptotanshinone	Diterpene	Salvia miltiorrhiza	× CLp and PLpro	(Jiang et al. 2017; Chang et al. 2018)
Curcumin	Flavonoid	Curcuma longa	× virus replication and CLp	(Wen et al. 2007; Cione et al. 2020)
Shikonin	Naphthoquinone	Lithospermum officinale	× CLp	(Jin et al. 2020; Mollaei et al. 2019)
Matrine	Alkaloid	Aspergillus terreus	Improves altered parameters and clinical symptoms	(Liu et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2017)

Hinders × , HA hepatitis A, RLRs retinoic acid inducible gene I-like receptors, CLp chymotrypsin like protease, ACE2 angiotensin-converting enzyme

Fig. 3.

A diagrammatic illustration of key targets for natural products as anti-COVID-19

COVID-19 vaccines

Vaccines are necessary for controlling the severity and spreading of infection. There are many vaccination strategies tested in animals such as live attenuated virus, inactivated virus, recombinant DNA, viral vectors, subunit vaccines and protein vaccines. These studies are still continued and can take months or years to complete. Nowadays researchers are busy in developing vaccines against pandemic COVID-19 but the process of making a new drug entity and a vaccine is time taking (Khanal et al. 2021). Most of the antiCOVID-19 vaccines safety studies excludes older people due to associated comorbidities and weakness such as AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Pfizer have scarce data regarding vaccines safety in aged and sensitive individuals (Soiza et al. 2021). Centre for disease control and prevention (CDA) does not recommend one anti-COVID-19 vaccine over the other.

The detail of several COVID-19 vaccines, manufacturer, adverse effects, efficacy, safety, dose and their mechanism are mentioned in Table 4, Figs. 4 and 5. Whereas, efficacy (%) of different available COVID-19 vaccines is shown in Fig. 6.

Table 4.

Available vaccines against COVID-19 safety and efficacy in terms of clinical trials

Sr No	COVID-19 vaccines	Brand name of COVID-19 vaccines	Other vaccine name	Vaccine type	Manufacturer	Clinical trial phase	Number of doses/route of administration	Immunity develop	People who can be vaccinated	Adverse effect	Efficacy (%)	References
1	SinoVac	SinoVac	CoronaVac	SARS-CoV-2 vaccine inactivated with aluminium hydroxide	Wuhan Institute of Biological products, China/Sinovac Biotech, China	3	0.5 ml divided into 2 doses-14 days apart/ IM	Post 2 weeks of second dose	18 years and above	Pain, fever	50	(Zhang et al. 2020; Baden et al. 2021; Gao et al. 2020)
2	Pfizer-BioNTech	Comirnaty	BNT162B1	mRNA vaccine	Pfizer, INC., and BioNTech, Germany	3	0.3 ml divided in 2 doses—21 days apart/ IM	Post 2 weeks of second dose	12 years and above	Pain, redness, joint pain, muscle pain, paroxysmal ventricular arrhythmia	95	(Ewer et al. 2021; Polack et al. 2020)
3	Moderna	Moderna	mRNA1273	mRNA vaccine	Moderna/National institute of allergy and infectious diseases	3	0.5 ml divided into 2 doses—21 days apart/IM	Post 2 weeks of getting dose	18 years and above	Local and systemic reaction	94	(Jackson et al. 2020; Baden et al. 2021)
4	Jansseen COVID-19 Vaccine	Janssen/J&J	Ad26COVS1	Virus vector vaccine	Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies, Netherland	3	2 doses—21 days apart/IM	Post 2 weeks of second dose	18 years and above	Irritation	73.1	(Corbett et al. 2020; Sadoff et al. 2021)
5	AstraZeneca	Vaxzevria/ Covishield	ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222	Virus vector vaccine	AstraZeneca, Oxford, England/Serum institute of India, Pune	3	2 doses intermittently, each dose 12 weeks apart/IM	Post 2 weeks of second dose	18 years and above	A pathogenic PF4-dependent syndrome may develop	70.4	(Folegatti et al. 2020; Voysey et al. 2021; Scully et al. 2021)
6	SputnikV	Sputnik V	Gram Covid Vac	Virus vector vaccine	Gamaleya Research Institute, Russia	3	0.5 ml in 2 doses—21 days apart	Post 2 weeks of second dose	18 years and above	Flu-like illness, headache, asthenia, renal colic, deep vein thrombosis	91	(Logunov et al. 2020, 2021)
7	Novavax	Covavax	NVX-CoV2373	Virus resemble vaccine particles (adjuvanted recombinant protein nanoparticle)	Novavax Biotechnology company, America	3	2 doses—21 days apart/IM		18 years and above	Fatigue, headache, pain	96	(Callaway and Mallapaty 2021; Shinde et al. 2021)
8	Sinopharm	Sinopharm	BBIBP-CorV	Inactivated virus vaccine	Beijing Bio-Institute of Biological Products, China	3	2 doses—21 days apart	Post-vaccination	18 years and above	Mild cellulitis	79	(Xia et al. 2021; Keech et al. 2020)
9	Covaxin	Covaxin	BBV152	Inactivated virus vaccine	Bharat Biotech, India	3	2 doses—4 weeks apart	Post-vaccination of 2nd dose	18 years and above	Pain at site of injection	81	(Ella et al. 2021)
10	CanSino	Convidecia	Ad5-nCoV	Vector vaccine	CanSino Biologics, China	3	One shot	Post-vaccination	18 years and above	Pain at site of injection	65.7	(Sharma et al. 2020)

Fig. 4.

Illustration of several COVID-19 vaccines and their mechanism (

modified from Dash et al. 2021)

Fig. 5.

Illustration of several COVID-19 vaccines and their mechanism (

modified from Dash et al. 2021)

Fig. 6.

Graphical representation of percentage efficacy of different COVID-19 vaccines

CoronaVac

Sinovac vaccine denatured with aluminium hydroxide has progressed to phase 3 CT. It is fairly well-tolerated and immunogenic in healthy people (Zhang et al. 2020) as shown in Fig. 4.

BNT162B1

The nucleic acid vaccines include mRNA and DNA vaccines. These vaccines are translated into viral proteins after injection. S protein has been the most popular candidate among COVID-19 proteins. Because of their high potency and potential to degrade quickly, mRNA vaccines are prospective substitutes to other vaccines (Wang et al. 2020b). In phase 1/2 trials, BNT162B1 attacked the RBD of the S protein. The most vaccinators experienced mild to moderate systemic and local symptoms (Ewer et al. 2021). In phase 3 CT, a total of 43,548 people were randomly assigned, 21,720 were injected with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. In people 16 and older, a 2-dose treatment of it provided 95% efficacy (Polack et al. 2020).

BioNTech (Pfizer) is the very first safe and effective vaccine which is authorized for emergency use in COVID-19, though, is not recommended by WHO in children below the age of 16 years. Due to paucity of safety data in pregnant and lactating women, it can be vaccinated in these women depending on risk benefit ratio.

mRNA1273

The two-dose vaccine sequence did not produce adverse effects and could elicit neutralization and Th1-biased CD4 + T-cell responses. The mode of action is shown in Fig. 4. According to a phase 1 trial, this vaccine was injected to a group and other group received placebo (15,210 members in each group) (Jackson et al. 2020). Its % efficacy is 94.1 (Fig. 6).

Ad26COVS1

It is a recombinant transgenic vaccine consisting of adenovirus type5 (rAd5) and 26 (rAd26) (Logunov et al. 2020) as shown in Fig. 4. There were 19,630 SARS-CoV-2–negative respondents were inoculated with Ad26COV2S1 and 19,691 individuals who received placebo. It exhibited 73.1 in severe and 81.7% efficacy (Fig. 6) in critical Covid-19, respectively (Sadoff et al. 2021). The Janssen (J and J) is recommended for immunization against COVID-19 by WHO for people of 18 years and above. Pregnant and lactating women can be vaccinated with J&J on the basis of risk benefit ratio. It will not recommend in hypersensitive individual or having history of allergy to component of vaccine.

ChAdOx1 nCoV-19

The effectiveness, protection, and immunogenicity of a chimp adeno (ChAd)-vectored vaccine framework encoding the S protein with codon optimization were observed. It was found to be stable, tolerable, and immunogenic in a phase 1 and 2 CTs. Furthermore, acetaminophen should be concomitantly used as it alleviates adverse reactions such as pain, fever, and muscle ache in post-vaccinated individual (Folegatti et al. 2020) as mentioned in Table 4. The vaccine’s overall efficacy was 70.4% (Voysey et al. 2021) as mentioned in Fig. 6.

AstraZeneca produced by Serum Institute of India and Republic of Korea is reviewed by European Medicine Agency (EMA) for safety, quality and efficacy and recommend its use for all people of 18 years and more. Pregnant and lactating women can be vaccinated with AstraZeneca on the basis of risk benefit ratio. It will not recommend in hypersensitive individual or having history of allergic reactions to any component of vaccine.

Sputnik V

It is a vector vaccine that consists of rAd26 and rAd5 vaccine vectors, which is administered intramuscularly at 21-day intervals (Table 4). In the virus, the dsDNA coding for the spike protein is preserved. Infected cells produce the spike protein that triggers an immune reaction (immunogenicity). In Moscow, a phase 3 RCT with placebo control was carried in 25 hospitals and polyclinics. It prevented infection in 91.6% (Fig. 6) with no significant adverse effects except rash and immune reaction. Three severe adverse effects were identified in the vaccine community among participants above the age of 60 years included renal colic, deep vein thrombosis, and abscesses in the extremities as mentioned in Table 4 (Logunov et al. 2021). The mechanism of action of that vaccine is presented in Fig. 5.

EpiVac corona and CoviVac are the two other Russian vaccines that are approved by Russian Government for emergency use. These two vaccines are now under large scale CTs. EpiVac is synthetic peptide antigen while CoviVac contains inactivated cold virus.

BBIBP-CorV

Inactivated or killed viruses can produce native antigenic epitopes (binding to T- and B-cell antibodies) present in a stable and conformational manner (Delrue et al. 2012). BBIBP-CorV is manufactured by Beijing Bio-Institute of Biological Products (BBIBP). In BBIBP-CorV vaccine, SARS-COV-2 is chemically inactive (with betapropiolactone), thus it cannot replicate but all of the protein is still intact. The Shangqiu City, China, conducted a phase 1/2 RCT of this vaccine in comparison to placebo control. The trial involved healthy individuals (aged 18–80 years) in phase 1 and adult individuals (aged 18–59 years) in phase 2. It is safe and well tolerated at all tested doses and presented 79% efficacy against Covid-19 (Xia et al. 2021).

Sinopharm Vac (BBIBP-CorV) is still not authorized/reviewed by world’s chief drug regulatory authorities such as the FDA, European Medicine Agency (EMA) and the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare products. WHO has authorized its use for emergency in adults of above 18 years on May 7, 2021. The commonly reported minor adverse effects of Sinopharma Vac in individuals aged 19–59 are fever, headache, allergy, pain, and swelling at injection site while serious includes nausea, facial nerve symptoms, clot formation, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. The WHO holds serious concerns over age gap for safety study of Chinese vaccine. There are various controversies about safety and efficacy of that Vac because of the lack of CT data regarding individuals above 60 years of age. Aluminium hydroxide is used as adjuvant in Sinopharma Vac that strengthens the host’s immune system for incorporated vaccine (Baraniuk 2021; Crasto 2021).

NVX-CoV2373

Another strategy for vaccine production is to use protein S as a recombinant protein subunit. This approach may protect immunized cells in vitro, but it has the potential to produce a polarized immune response in humans. Novavax, a vaccine uses adjuvant Matrix-M^™ to improve immune response and has efficacy of 96% in COVID-19 patients under clinical trials phase 3 (Callaway and Mallapaty 2021). The most reported adverse effects among vaccine recipients were headache and muscle pain (Shinde et al. 2021).

BBV152

It is known as Covaxin manufactured by Bharat Biotech, India. It is an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. At nine hospitals in India, a double-blind, RCT phase 2 was conducted to assess its immunogenicity and efficacy in healthy individuals (12–65 years). It induced strong neutralizing antibody responses in the phase 1 trial, which were raised 3 months later in all individuals. It showed enhanced reactogenicity, adaptive immunity and protection in phase 2 CT (Ella et al. 2021). It exhibits 81% efficacy against COVID-19 original strain in phase 3 CT (Fig. 6). The mechanism of action is presented in Fig. 5.

Ad5-nCoV/CanSino

It is another corona vaccine manufactured by CanSino Biologics, China. It has 65.7% efficacy. It is single shot vaccine with similar efficacy to other vector vaccines like J&J, Gamaleya, AD26. It is recommended for people 18 years of age and above (Sharma et al. 2020).

Rare adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines

Janssen (J and J) was the very first, safe, and effective (older too) vaccine tool authorized for use by WHO and European Medicine Agency (EMA) in all countries, a step forward to combat COVID-19. On 13 Apr 2021, US regulatory agency temporarily restricted the use of J and J vaccine due to rarely reported adverse effects such as thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. The European regulators also reported thrombosis and thrombocytopenia with AstraZeneca vaccine in the same week. Blood clotting occurred mainly in veins of the brain and abdomen. Arteries are also affected in some cases, nevertheless the exact mechanism of thrombosis is ambiguous. Blood clotting is reported with AstraZeneca especially in women below 60 years of age within 2 weeks of vaccination. Heparin induced thrombocytopenia is also rarely reported adverse event among patients taking heparin (anticoagulants). HIT is also reported even in those individual who are not taking heparin (Greinacher et al. 2021).

Schultz and coworker (2021) conducted a study on healthcare workers (aged 32–54 years) receiving AstraZeneca and reported venous thrombosis in 5 out of 130,000 vaccinated workers, who had not taken heparin. Moreover, the high titer of antibodies to platelet factor-4-polyanion complex was reported in those workers (Schultz et al. 2021). The regulators and researchers still recommend the use of AstraZeneca because the benefits of this vaccine outweigh the risks. The regulators and researchers still recommend the use of AstraZeneca vaccine because benefits outweigh the risks. Although several countries restrict its use in specific age groups, some countries hold its.

Both are adenovirus vector vaccines encoding the corona spike protein in human cells. The human cell uses this DNA information for the synthesis of more spike protein that develops ultimately develops an immune reaction against it (Ledford 2021). There is a lack of HIT like reaction in recipients of mRNA vaccines. Another vaccine, Sputnik V containing a different adenovirus vector has also exhibited a rare blood clot formation reaction. Various factors influence the blood clot formation with different adenovirus vector containing vaccines (AstraZeneca, J and J, and Sputnik V) such as different viruses used, cells type in which they are produced, and number of spike protein they carry, the mode of their purity, and dose of administration (Baraniuk 2021).

A study conducted on 64,503 COVID-19 patients showed that the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was 14.7%, pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis was 7.8 and 11.2%, respectively. The occurrence of VTE in COVID-19 hospitalized patients ranged from 0–69% (Tan et al. 2021). Although exact mechanism of arterial VTE in COVID-19 patients is still unclear yet the contribution of systemic and endothelial inflammation activating factors, vascular coagulopathy, fibrinogen, factor VIII action, hypoxemia, and antiphospholipid antibodies response are evident (Vickers et al. 2017).

Virologists are currently working on the effect of various vaccines in vitro on vascular cells. The identification of trigger for that rare thrombosis effect is a key safety issue for the development of future vaccines. There is an immense need to sort out either we have to rely on adenovirus vaccines or turn towards mRNA vaccine development.

The CDC has reported rare adverse effects such as pericarditis and myocarditis with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (BioNTech and Moderna) in adolescent and young individuals but vaccine’s benefits outweigh the rarely reported potential risks and BioNTech is recommended for 12 years and older (https://www.cdc.gov).

The additives and adjuvants used in COVID-19 vaccines may impart crucial role in causing rare and common adverse effects. Immunologists are unsure whether vectors, contamination in vectors or spike protein are responsible for antibody formation against platelet factor-4 in HIT. Allergic reactions occur mostly due to excipients/adjuvant rather than active moiety (Kounis et al. 2021). Allergic reactions either major or minor are encountered with vaccines likewise other medications. Anaphylactic reactions, often are life threating and rarely occurring allergic reactions, are occasionally instigated due to inert material called excipients used in vaccine formulation to heighten palatability, absorption, stability, solubility, etc. Polyethylene glycol is used as excipient in BioNTech and Moderna vaccines while Polysorbate-80 used in AstraZeneca and J and J COVID-19 vaccines. In a previous study, the prevalence of allergic reactions was reported to be 1.31 out of a million vaccinated individuals, age and sex were equally contributing factors but females were appeared to be more sensitive in this regard (Kounis et al. 2021).

Adjuvants have been using in vaccines formulation for a long time, Aluminum salt based adjuvants (Alum) are the first recommended adjuvants for human use vaccines because of their consolidating effect on the immune response and good safety record (Liang et al. 2020). Adjuvants are also responsible for post vaccination adverse events. Aluminium hydroxide used as adjuvant in SARS coronavirus vaccine comprising of inactivated (by formalin or beta propiolactone) virus exhibited lung immunopathology in a previous study carried on mice (Tseng et al. 2012). Al salts also exhibited neurotoxicity and led to autoimmune reactions (Shaw et al. 2014; Danielsson and Eriksson 2021; Shoenfeld and Agmon 2011).

Conclusion

Allopathic medications cause acute toxicity in patients, which reduces the benefits of antiviral drugs and that risk exacerbates in patients with underlying heart or liver diseases. This toxicity risk prompts patient noncompliance and switch towards the alternative medicines that have lower side effects as compared to pharmacological drugs. Despite immense efforts and studies in the field of drug repurposing, significant roadblocks remain in the way of widespread use of repurposed medications, including problems with clinical dosage, safety, and delivery capabilities. Due to differences in choice of alternative medicines and lack of standardized data of the investigated formulations, it is currently difficult to draw information from the past studies. Nonetheless, there is inadequate evidence of significant antiviral effects unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. To determine their role in COVID-19 treatment, further research is needed to evaluate the detail mechanism regarding anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, and also the safety and quality of herbal medicines should be studied in COVID-19 patients/healthy individuals. Furthermore, there is an immense need to sort out more vaccines against COVID-19 with 98–99% efficacy that should be cheap and safe in use. The clinical trials of available vaccines should be conducted on a large group of participants, including pregnant and lactating females as well as children of different age groups as there is no single COVID-19 vaccine for maternal and children below 12 years of age. The safety profile of vaccine is crucial in the success of any vaccination program. Vaccine pharmacovigilance is playing a significant role in finding out a safe antiCOVID-19 vaccine that had developed. There is massive demand of robust vigilance system to find and resolve untoward effects linked to anti-COVID-19 vaccine. Due to complicated safety and efficacy concerns, CDA does not recommend one anti-COVID-19 vaccine over the other. Last but not the least, precautionary measures such as wearing mask and social distancing are better than getting infected. To date, there is no single curative treatment for this morbid and fatal virus.

Author contributions

AS and MFA planned and designed the study. All authors contributed to data collection. AS and MFA wrote the manuscript. AS, MFA and MMAD critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.